Search

Background: The ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion gene has recently been described in tumours with kinship to so-called high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS). This subset of tumour behaves similarly to YWHAE-NUTM2A/B HG-ESS, however, they are both morphologically and immunophenotypically distinct neoplasms. The identification rearrangements in the BCOR gene has been accepted as both the driver and requisite feature in creating a novel sub-entity within the category of HG-ESS.Preliminary investigations into BCOR HG-ESS have shown similar outcomes to YWHAE-NUTM2A/B HG-ESS with patients tending to present with high stage disease. Clinical recurrences and metastases to lymph nodes, sacrum/bone, pelvis/peritoneum, lung, bowel and skin have been identified. In this report, we describe a case of BCOR HG-ESS, that is deeply myoinvasive and widely metastatic. Metastatic deposits include a tumor in the breast discovered on self-examination; a metastatic site that has yet to be reported in the literature.Case Presentation: A 59-year-old female underwent biopsy for post-menopausal bleeding, yielding a diagnosis of “low-grade spindle cell neoplasm with myxoid stroma and endometrial glands”, favouring endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS). She was referred for total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The uterine neoplasm was both intracavitary and deeply myoinvasive with morphology consistent with that of the biopsy specimen. Characteristic immunohistochemistry (IHC) was noted, and fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed BCOR rearrangement, supporting a diagnosis of BCOR high grade ESS (HG-ESS). Notably, BCOR HG-ESS has been proposed to have an association with MDM2 amplification but there were no abnormalities of MDM2 associated with this case. A few months postoperatively, the patient underwent breast core biopsy which revealed metastatic HG-ESS at a site not previously reported in the literature. Conclusions: This case highlights some of the diagnostic challenges posed by uterine mesenchymal neoplasms, and exemplifies the emerging histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, molecular and clinicopathologic features of the recently described HG-ESS with ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion gene. It adds to the body of evidence supporting the inclusion of BCOR HG-ESS as a sub-entity of HG-ESS within the endometrial stromal and related tumours subcategory of uterine mesenchymal tumors, as well as the poor prognosis and high metastatic potential of this tumor.

We measured the variation in practice across all aspects of endometrial cancer (EC) management and assessed the potential impact of implementation of molecular classification.Centers from across Canada provided representative tumor samples and clinical data, including preoperative workup, operative management, hereditary cancer program (HCP) referrals, adjuvant therapy, surveillance and outcomes, for all EC patients diagnosed in 2016. Tumors were classified into the four ProMisE molecular subtypes.A total of 1336 fully evaluable EC patients were identified from 10 tertiary cancer centers (TC; n = 1022) and 19 community centers (CC; n = 314). Variation of surgical practice across TCs was profound (14-100%) for lymphadenectomy (LND) (mean 57% Gr1/2, 82% Gr3) and omental sampling (20% Gr1/2, 79% Gr3). Preoperative CT scans were inconsistently obtained (mean 32% Gr1/2, 51% Gr3) and use of adjuvant chemo or chemoRT in high risk EC ranged from 0-55% and 64-100%, respectively. Molecular subtyping was performed retrospectively and identified 6% POLEmut, 28% MMRd, 48% NSMP and 18% p53abn ECs, and was significantly associated with survival. Within patients retrospectively diagnosed with MMRd EC only 22% had been referred to HCP. Of patients with p53abn EC, LND and omental sampling was not performed in 21% and 23% respectively, and 41% received no chemotherapy. Comparison of management in 2016 with current 2020 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines identified at least 26 and 95 patients that would have been directed to less or more adjuvant therapy, respectively (10% of cohort).Molecular classification has the potential to mitigate the profound variation in practice demonstrated in current EC care, enabling reproducible risk assessment, guiding treatment and reducing health care disparities.

Collagen deposition is observed in several cutaneous neoplasms and its derivation is variable. It can represent (1) a mesenchymal component of a biphasic tumor, (2) a desmoplastic host response to a neoplasm, or (3) a product of the tumor cells. The result is that collagenous (desmoplastic) variants of many cutaneous neoplasms are well recognized. In regard to atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX), conventional wisdom holds that intratumoral collagen is not commonly observed, apart from the rare sclerotic subtype of the neoplasm. This has not been our experience. The relatively frequent observation of keloidal collagen in AFXs and the dearth of information in the literature about this phenomenon prompted us to investigate the matter. All cases of AFX diagnosed at our institution within a 10-year period (1999-2008) were reviewed. The group included 64 males and 27 females with a mean age of 75 years. The majority of the cases (92%) were located on the head or neck. The conventional pleomorphic subtype of the tumor was encountered most frequently (67%). In 17 of the 91 cases (19%), prominent intratumoral keloidal collagen was present. This morphological observation poses interesting questions: (1) Is the collagen part of a host response to the neoplasm or is it a product of the tumor cells? (2) If the latter, does it cast light on the controversial histogenesis of AFX? (3) Does it signify an involutional stage of the tumor and imply a favorable prognosis? (4) Is it related to the "sclerotic" variant of the tumor? We discuss the above quandaries and emphasize the need to register this variant of AFX amongst other morphological subtypes of the tumor. The goal is to facilitate accuracy in diagnosis and to promote further investigation.