Search

Present study was designed to evaluate toxic effects of copper (Cu) (@ 33 mg/kg b.wt.) and flubendimide (Flb) (@ 200 mg/kg b.wt.) alone and/or in combination on blood-biochemical indices, oxidative stress, and drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) in vivo in male Wistar rats following oral exposure continuously for 90 days and their immunotoxic (cyto-genotoxic and apoptotic) potential in vitro on thymocytes. In in vivo study, ameliorative potential of α-tocopherol was assessed, whereas α-tocopherol, curcumin, resveratrol, and catechin were evaluated for protective effect in vitro. Significantly (P resveratrol > catechin = α-tocopherol.

To investigate whether an increased bolus: basal insulin ratio (BBR) with liver-targeted bolus insulin (BoI) would increase BoI use and decrease hypoglycaemic events (HEv).We enrolled 52 persons (HbA1c 6.9% ± 0.12%, mean ± SEM) with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injections. Hepatic-directed vesicle (HDV) was used to deliver 1% of peripheral injected BoI to the liver. A 90-day run-in period was used to introduce subjects to unblinded continuous glucose monitoring and optimize standard basal insulin (BaI) (degludec) and BoI (lispro) dosing. At 90 days, BoI was changed to HDV-insulin lispro and subjects were randomized to an immediate 10% or 40% decrease in BaI dose.At 90 days postrandomization, total insulin dosing was increased by ~7% in both cohorts. The -10% and -40% BaI cohorts were on 7.7% and 13% greater BoI with 6.9% and 30% (P = .02) increases in BBR, respectively. Compared with baseline at randomization, nocturnal level 2 HEv were reduced by 21% and 43%, with 54% and 59% reductions in patient-reported HEv in the -10% and -40% BaI cohorts, respectively.Our study shows that liver-targeted BoI safely decreases HEv and symptoms without compromising glucose control. We further show that with initiation of liver-targeted BoI, the BBR can be safely increased by significantly lowering BaI dosing, leading to greater BoI usage.

Introduction: This trial assessed safety and effectiveness of an advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system with automated basal (Auto Basal) and automated bolus correction (Auto Correction) in adol...

Hyperglucagonemia contributes to hyperglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, novel therapeutics that block glucagon action could improve glycemic control. This phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of volagidemab, an antagonistic monoclonal glucagon receptor (GCGR) antibody, as an adjunct to insulin therapy in adults with T1D. The primary endpoint was change in daily insulin use at week 12. Secondary endpoints included changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 13, in average daily blood glucose concentration and time within target range as assessed by continuous blood glucose monitoring (CGM) and seven-point glucose profile at week 12, incidence of hypoglycemic events, the proportion of subjects who achieve HbA1c reduction of ≥0.4%, volagidemab drug concentrations and incidence of anti-drug antibodies. Eligible participants (n = 79) were randomized to receive weekly subcutaneous injections of placebo, 35 mg volagidemab or 70 mg volagidemab. Volagidemab produced a reduction in total daily insulin use at week 12 (35 mg volagidemab: -7.59 units (U) (95% confidence interval (CI) -11.79, -3.39; P = 0.040 versus placebo); 70 mg volagidemab: -6.64 U (95% CI -10.99, -2.29; P = 0.084 versus placebo); placebo: -1.27 U (95% CI -5.4, 2.9)) without meeting the prespecified significance level (P

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common skin diseases of dogs. Defects in the skin barrier and overproduction of inflammatory cytokines may be the pathogenesis of canine AD. Therefore, the present study was aimed to quantify the gene expression of certain skin barrier proteins and inflammatory cytokines in dogs with AD. Eleven dogs with AD and three healthy dogs were included in the present study. The skin barrier proteins, namely Filaggrin (FLG) and Involucrin (IVL), gene expression was quantified by Real-time PCR in the lesional skin tissues of the atopic dogs and normal skin of the healthy dogs. In addition to the skin proteins, the gene expressions of the interleukin (IL)-13, IL-31, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α were also quantified in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of these dogs. Compared to the healthy dogs, significantly higher (P ≤ 0.01) FLG gene expression and significantly (P ≤ 0.05) lower expression of the IVL gene were quantified in the skin of atopic dogs. Further, the dogs with AD revealed significantly higher expression of TNF-α (P ≤ 0.01), IL-31 (P ≤ 0.05), and IL-13 (P ≤ 0.05) as compared to the healthy dogs. The findings of our present study evidently suggest significantly increased and decreased expressions of FLG and IVL genes, respectively, which may be responsible for disruption of the skin barrier in dogs with AD. While, the over-expressions of TNF-α, IL-31, and IL-13 genes might be attributed to the clinical pathology and manifestations of AD in dogs. However, further studies are warranted to substantiate our hypothesis about pathogenesis and clinical manifestation of AD in dogs by including a large number of animals.

This study unravels the differential involvement of calcium signaling pathway(s) in PGF2α-induced contractions in myometrium of nonpregnant (NP) and pregnant buffaloes. Compared to the myometrium of pregnant animals, myometrium of NP buffaloes was more sensitive to PGF2α as manifested by changes in mean integral tension (MIT) and tonicity. In the presence of nifedipine, myometrial contraction to PGF2α was significantly attenuated in both NP and pregnant uteri; however, mibefradil and NNC 55-0396 produced inhibitory effects only in uterus of pregnant animals, thus suggesting the role of extracellular Ca2+ influx through nifedipine-sensitive L-type Ca2+-channels both in NP and pregnant, but T-type Ca2+ channels seem to play a role only during pregnancy. Entry of extracellular Ca2+ is triggered by enhanced functional involvement of Pyr3-sensitive TRPC3 channels and Rho-kinase pathways as evidenced by a significant rightward shift of the concentration–response curve of PGF2α in the presence of Pyr3 and Y-27632 in NP myometrium. But significant down-expressions of TRPC3 and Rho-A proteins during pregnancy apparently facilitate uterine quiescence. In the presence of Ca2+-free solution and cyclopiazonic acid (SERCA blocker), feeble contraction to PGF2α was observed in both NP and pregnant myometrium which suggests minor role of intracellular source of Ca2+ in mediating PGF2α-induced contractions in these tissues.

Background: Recent development and availability of several connected insulin pens with digital memory are likely to expand the availability of glucose and insulin metrics that previously had been available only for the much smaller number of people using insulin pumps. It would be highly desirable to standardize data presentations to avoid the chaotic emergence of multiple formats that might reduce the clinical utility of connected pens. Methods: We reviewed the literature and analyzed data displays from multiple blood glucose monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), insulin pump, and automated insulin delivery systems, and methods for combination of glucose and insulin data. We examined multiple forms of presentation and now propose a prototype for a standardized method for data analysis and display, focusing on the content and format of a one-page dashboard summary for patients on multiple daily injection (MDI) insulin regimens. Results: We propose the following metrics to be included in the one-page report: (A) glucose metrics: simplified glucose distribution in the form of a stacked bar chart showing percentages of time below-, above-, or within-target ranges overall and (optionally) by date, by time of day, or day of the week; (B) insulin metrics: types and doses, and timing of basal and bolus insulin; (C) an enhanced ambulatory glucose profile or "AGP+" showing glucose data points and/or distributions (10th to 90th percentiles), dosages and timing of basal and bolus insulins and (optionally) graphical display of risk of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia; and (D) user experience regarding technology usage, frequency of alerts for hypo- and hyperglycemia, and information regarding lifestyle, meals, exercise, and sleep, if available; and (E) clinical insights and interpretation. Conclusion: We propose a prototype for a dashboard summary report of glucose, insulin, meals, and activity data intended for providers and patients on MDI using connected pens and CGM. Our goal is to stimulate development of a standardized approach.

The increasing prevalence of diabetes, combined with a growing global shortage of health care professionals (HCP), necessitates the need to develop new approaches to diabetes care delivery to expand access to care, lessen the burden on people with diabetes, improve efficiencies, and reduce the unsustainable financial liability on health systems and payers. Use of digital diabetes technologies and telehealth protocols within a digital/virtual diabetes clinic has the potential to address these challenges. However, several issues must be resolved to move forward. In February 2020, organizers of the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes Annual Conference convened an international panel of HCP, researchers, patient advocates, and industry representatives to review the status of digital diabetes technologies, characterize deficits in current technologies, and identify issues for consideration. Since that meeting, the importance of using telehealth and digital diabetes technologies has been demonstrated amid the global coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This article summarizes the panel's discussion of the opportunities, obstacles, and requisites for advancing the use of these technologies as a standard of care for the management of diabetes.

Earlier we have reported mercury-induced alterations in functional dynamics of buck spermatozoa through free radicals-mediated oxidative stress and spontaneous acrosome reaction. Based on our earlier findings, we aimed to investigate the effect of mercury exposure on motility, kinematic patterns, DNA damage, apoptosis and ultra-structural alterations in goat spermatozoa following in vitro exposure to different concentrations (0.031–1.25 µg/ml) of mercuric chloride for 15 min and 3 h. Following exposure of sperm cells to 0.031 µg/ml of mercuric chloride for 3 h, livability and motility of sperms was significantly reduced along with altered kinematic patterns, significant increase in per cent necrotic sperm cells and number of cells showing DNA damage; and this effect was dose- and time-dependent. Contrary to up-regulation of Bax gene after 3 h in control group, there was significant increase in expression of Bcl-2 in mercury-treated groups. Transmission electron microscopy studies revealed rifts and nicks in plasma and acrosomal membrane, mitochondrial sheath, and collapsed mitochondria with loss of helical organization of mitochondria in the middle piece of spermatozoa. Our findings evidently suggest that mercury induces necrosis instead of apoptosis and targets the membrane, acrosome, mid piece of sperms; and the damage to mitochondria seems to be responsible for alterations in functional and kinematic attributes of spermatozoa.

Objective: A CGM sensor that is disposable and requires no calibration may make glucose management easier for people living with diabetes. The present study reports on the interim analysis of a new disposable zero-calibration sensor in adults and youth with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) . Methods: A prospective study enrolled individuals (N=123 adults, aged 18-80 years and N=120 youth, aged 2-17 years) with diabetes at 13 sites in the United States. Raw sensor data were compared with a YSI (Yellow Springs Instruments) or blood glucose (BG) reference and involved N=15388 paired points (pps) from the arm of adults, and N=8627pps from the arm and 7781pps from the buttock of youth. Data were processed using a new zero-calibration algorithm. The primary endpoint was agreement within 20%/20mg/dL (sensor glucose [SG] ≥80mg/dL/ Results: The overall 20%/20mg/dL agreement rate was 90.6% for adults, and 87.8% and 88.5% for youth arm and buttock, respectively. For adults, the 15%/15mg/dL agreement rates were 90.1% and 87.6% (SG 180 mg/dL, respectively) . For youth, the 15%/15mg/dL rates were 93.2% and 86.5% for the arm (SG 180 mg/dL, respectively) and 90.3% and 89.5% for the buttock (SG 180 mg/dL, respectively) . The MARDs were 10.2% for adults, and 10.7% and 10.1% for youth arm and buttock, respectively. Conclusion: These interim findings on the clinical performance of the new disposable and calibration-free sensor are good and may support non-adjunctive insulin dosing in standalone CGM and automated insulin delivery systems. Disclosure B.W.Bode: Advisory Panel; CeQur SA, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Zealand Pharma A/S, Consultant; Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., Research Support; Abbott, Beta Bionics, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Diasome, Dompé, Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, IQVIA Inc., Jaeb Center for Health Research, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Provention Bio, Inc., REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanvita Medical, Senseonics, ViaCyte, Inc., Speaker’s Bureau; Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, MannKind Corporation, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Stock/Shareholder; AgaMatrix, Glytec, LLC. J.Shin: Employee; Medtronic. F.Peng: None. S.Huang: n/a. A.S.Rhinehart: Employee; Medtronic, Stock/Shareholder; Medtronic. R.A.Vigersky: Employee; Medtronic. T.S.Bailey: Advisory Panel; Abbott Diabetes, CeQur SA, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Consultant; LifeScan, Sanofi, Research Support; Abbott Diabetes, Abbott Diagnostics, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Livongo, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Sanvita Medical, Senseonics, ViaCyte, Inc., vTv Therapeutics, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker’s Bureau; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Medtronic, Sanofi. K.N.Castorino: Consultant; Lilly Diabetes, Research Support; Abbott Diabetes, Dexcom, Inc., Drawbridge Health, Inc., Eyenuk, Inc., Laxmi Therapeutic Devices, Medtronic, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Novo Nordisk, Speaker’s Bureau; Dexcom, Inc. M.P.Christiansen: Research Support; Abbott Diabetes, Ascensia Diabetes Care, AstraZeneca, Biolinq, Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Helixmith, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. S.K.Garg: Advisory Panel; Bayer AG, Medtronic, Zealand Pharma A/S, Consultant; Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Medtronic. K.B.Kaiserman: Advisory Panel; Medtronic, Consultant; Medtronic, Employee; MannKind Corporation, Research Support; Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Medtronic, Stock/Shareholder; MannKind Corporation. D.R.Liljenquist: None. D.I.Shulman: Advisory Panel; Medtronic. R.H.Slover: None.

Background: The aim was to assess the safety and tolerability of the insulin aspart biosimilar/follow-on product SAR341402 (100 U/mL solution; SAR-Asp) and originator insulin aspart (100 U/mL; NN-Asp; NovoLog®) self-administered through an insulin pump. Materials and Methods: This randomized, open-label, 2 × 4-week crossover study enrolled 45 adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Participants were randomized 1:1 to the treatment sequence SAR-Asp/NN-Asp or NN-Asp/SAR-Asp. The basal and prandial insulin doses were individually titrated. The primary outcome was the number of participants with at least one infusion set occlusion (infusion set change due to failure-to-correct hyperglycemia [plasma glucose ≥250 mg/dL] by insulin pump bolus) during the 4-week treatment. The main secondary outcome was the number of participants with at least one episode of unexplained hyperglycemia (regardless of correction by an insulin pump bolus without apparent material defect, medical, dietary, insulin dosing reason, or pump problem). Results: The number of participants reporting ≥1 infusion set occlusion were similar between treatments: 14/43 on SAR-Asp (33 events) and 12/43 on NN-Asp (24 events). The estimated difference in infusion set occlusion risk for SAR-Asp versus NN-Asp was 4.1% (95% confidence interval: −9.3% to 17.4%). The number of participants with ≥1 episode of unexplained hyperglycemia was similar between treatments (31/43 on SAR-Asp [154 events]; 32/43 on NN-Asp [175 events]). Hypoglycemia, treatment-emergent adverse events, hypersensitivity, and injection site reactions were similar between treatments. Conclusions: SAR-Asp and NN-Asp were well tolerated and had similar infusion set occlusions over a 4-week period in insulin pump users with T1D.

Injectable trace minerals (ITMs) could provide a potential alternative way of trace mineral delivery for sick animals. Therefore, evaluation of ameliorative potentials of ITMs (copper, manganese, selenium, and zinc) on the circulating Th1/Th2 cytokine misbalance in Theileria annulata–infected calves was aimed. Forty-three T. annulata-infected newborn calves were randomly allocated into four groups: buparvaquone alone–treated group (BUPA), buparvaquone + oxytetracycline (BUPA + OXY)-treated group, buparvaquone + injectable trace minerals (BUPA + ITMs)-treated group, and BUPA + OXY + ITM-treated group. Blood samples were collected from each of the calves before the start of therapy (day 0) and on day 14 post-therapy. Serum contents of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were estimated by bovine specific ELISA kits. On day 14 post-therapy, significant amelioration in the circulating levels of the studied cytokines was not observed in the calves treated with BUPA, while the calves treated with BUPA + OXY revealed significant (P ≤ 0.04) amelioration in the circulating tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) level. The calves treated with BUPA + ITMs revealed significant (P ≤ 0.041) elevation in the circulating interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and significant (P ≤ 0.011) reduction in the interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels. Moreover, the calves treated with BUPA + OXY + ITMs revealed significant reduction in TNF-α (P ≤ 0.0001) and IL-10 (P ≤ 0.012) contents, and significant elevation in IFN-γ (P ≤ 0.0002) content on day 14 post-therapy. None of the treated calve group revealed significant alteration in the circulating level of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) on day 14 post-therapy. In conclusion, administration of ITMs to the therapeutic regimen of newborn calves with tropical theileriosis could be a promising therapeutic strategy. ITMs can be recommended for the amelioration of immunological misbalance due to tropical theileriosis in newborn calves.

Background: SAR341402 (SAR-Asp) is a biosimilar/follow-on of the originator insulin aspart-NovoLog®/NovoRapid® (NN-Asp). This study investigated whether the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity findings for SAR-Asp versus NN-Asp, observed over 6 months in people with type 1 (n = 497) or type 2 diabetes (n = 100) treated with multiple daily injections in combination with insulin glargine (Lantus®), are maintained after 12 months. Materials and Methods: GEMELLI 1 was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study. Participants completing the initial 6-month treatment period continued on SAR-Asp or NN-Asp, as randomized, for a 6-month safety extension. Results: Of the 597 participants randomized, 264 out of 301 (87.7%) and 263 out of 296 (88.9%) assigned to SAR-Asp and NN-Asp, respectively, completed 12 months of treatment. Improved glycemic control was sustained at 12 months in both treatment groups, with similar least-squares mean reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (SAR-Asp: -0.25%; NN-Asp: -0.26%). Fasting plasma glucose and seven-point self-monitored plasma glucose profile changes, including postprandial glucose excursions, and changes in mealtime and basal insulin dosages were similar between groups. Safety and tolerability, including anti-insulin aspart antibodies (AIAs; incidence, prevalence, titers, cross-reactivity to human insulin), neutralizing antibodies (incidence, prevalence), hypoglycemia, and treatment-emergent adverse events (including hypersensitivity events and injection site reactions), were similar between groups. No relationship was observed between maximum individual AIA titers and change in HbA1c or insulin dose, hypoglycemia, or hypersensitivity reactions or between efficacy/safety measures and subgroups by presence or absence of treatment-emergent AIA. Conclusions: SAR-Asp and NN-Asp demonstrated similar efficacy and safety (including immunogenicity) in people with diabetes over 12 months of treatment.

The efficacy of basal insulin (BI) for adequate glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been well documented by randomized clinical trials. This post hoc analysis of the Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment (ORBIT) study was performed to explore the 6-month dose of BI used in insulin-naïve T2DM patients achieving HbA1c target (7%) and determine the patient characteristics that affect the 6-month dose of BI in the setting of real-world clinics in China.This multicenter observational registry screened 19 894 adult T2DM patients with inadequately controlled hyperglycemia and treated with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in China. Of these patients, 5191 who continued to receive BI after 6 months and achieved HbA1c target were analyzed. Patient characteristics including age, body weight, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), use of OADs, insulin (type and dose), and glycemic control were recorded at baseline and 6-month follow-ups.The 6-month dose of BI needed for effective glycemic control was 0.20 ± 0.08 U/kg/day. High body mass index, high FPG, young age, longer duration of diabetes or OAD treatment, a greater number of OADs at baseline, and allocation to detemir and glargine were significant independent predictors for high dose of BI at 6 months.This post hoc analysis of the ORBIT registry provides key information on the 6-month dose of BI needed for effective glycemic control in Chinese T2DM patients. Furthermore, it identified crucial patient characteristics that are significant determinants of the dose of BI in a real-world setting.背景: 基础胰岛素(BI)对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖控制的有效性已被随机对照临床试验所证实。这项来自ORBIT研究的事后分析旨在探讨既往未接受胰岛素治疗的中国T2DM患者, 在临床真实世界中接受基础胰岛素治疗6个月后, HbA1c达标(7%)患者的基础胰岛素剂量及其相关特征。 方法: ORBIT研究在中国采用多中心观察性研究方法, 共筛选入组19894例接受口服降糖药(OAD)治疗但血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者。本研究对其中5191例持续接受BI治疗6个月且HbA1c达标(7%)的患者进行了分析。收集的患者特征包括基线和随访6个月时的年龄, 体重, 空腹血浆血糖(FPG), OAD使用情况, 胰岛素的类型和剂量以及血糖控制情况。 结果: 治疗6个月时血糖达标患者的BI剂量为0.20±0.08U/kg/d。高体重指数, 高FPG, 年龄小, 糖尿病病程或OAD治疗时间较长, 基线OAD种类多, 接受地特胰岛素或甘精胰岛素治疗是6个月时较高BI剂量的独立预测因素。 结论: 这项ORBIT研究的事后分析提供了启动基础胰岛素治疗6个月的中国2型糖尿病患者血糖控制达标所需BI剂量的关键信息。此外, 该研究明确了在临床真实世界中影响基础胰岛素剂量的患者特征。.

The present investigation was performed to explore the SNP in the promoter of the adiponectin (ADIPOQ) gene and its association with production and reproduction traits in Indian Sahiwal cows. A portion of the promoter (ADIPOQ) region of the ADIPOQ gene was amplified which revealed a 977 bp amplicon, and its PCR-RFLP assay with the restriction enzyme TasI revealed three genotypes, in which the CT genotype was the most frequent (62.32%), followed by CC (24.64%) and TT (13.04%). The frequency of the C and T alleles was 0.558 and 0.442, respectively. The ADIPOQ/TasI genotypes revealed a significant association with calving interval (CI) in the first and fourth lactations, in which the CC genotype showed a significantly (P, Cilj ovoga rada bio je istražiti polimorfizam pojedinačnog nukleotida (SNP) u promotoru gena za adiponektin (ADIPOQ) i njegovu povezanost s proizvodnim i rasplodnim svojstvima indijskog goveda Sahiwal pasmine. Dio promotora (ADIPOQ) regije gena ADIPOQ je umnožen i prikazan produktom 977 bp, a PCR-RFLP metodom s restrikcijom enzimom TasI dobivena su tri genotipa. Među njima najčešći je bio CT genotip (62,32 %), zatim CC (24,64 %) i TT (13,04 %). Učestalost C-alela bila je 0,558, a T-alela 0,442. ADIPOQ/TasI genotipovi su pokazali znakovitu povezanost s međutelidbenim intervalom (CI) u prvoj i četvrtoj laktaciji u kojima je CC genotip pokazao znakovito duži interval između teljenja (P

Hyperglucagonemia contributes to hyperglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, novel therapeutics that block glucagon action could improve glycemic control. This phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of volagidemab, an antagonistic monoclonal glucagon receptor (GCGR) antibody, as an adjunct to insulin therapy in adults with T1D. The primary endpoint was change in daily insulin use at week 12. Secondary endpoints included changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 13, in average daily blood glucose concentration and time within target range as assessed by continuous blood glucose monitoring (CGM) and seven-point glucose profile at week 12, incidence of hypoglycemic events, the proportion of subjects who achieve HbA1c reduction of ≥0.4%, volagidemab drug concentrations and incidence of anti-drug antibodies. Eligible participants (n = 79) were randomized to receive weekly subcutaneous injections of placebo, 35 mg volagidemab or 70 mg volagidemab. Volagidemab produced a reduction in total daily insulin use at week 12 (35 mg volagidemab: -7.59 units (U) (95% confidence interval (CI) -11.79, -3.39; P = 0.040 versus placebo); 70 mg volagidemab: -6.64 U (95% CI -10.99, -2.29; P = 0.084 versus placebo); placebo: -1.27 U (95% CI -5.4, 2.9)) without meeting the prespecified significance level (P lt; 0.025). At week 13, the placebo-corrected reduction in HbA1c percentage was -0.53 (95% CI -0.89 to -0.17, nominal P = 0.004) in the 35 mg volagidemab group and -0.49 (95% CI -0.85 to -0.12, nominal P = 0.010) in the 70 mg volagidemab group. No increase in hypoglycemia was observed with volagidemab therapy; however, increases in serum transaminases, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and blood pressure were observed. Although the primary endpoint did not meet the prespecified significance level, we believe that the observed reduction in HbA1c and tolerable safety profile provide a rationale for further randomized studies to define the long-term efficacy and safety of volagidemab in patients with T1D.

Present study was designed to assess the toxicity of copper @ 33 mg/kg and flubendiamide @ 200 mg/kg in vivo in male Wistar rats orally once daily for 90 days and protective effect of α-tocopherol, resveratrol, curcumin and catechin and in vitro cyto-genotoxicity in primary cell culture of thymocytes. In vivo study showed significant (p resveratrol >catechin = α-tocopherol.

Background: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems is being rapidly adopted as standard of care for insulin-requiring patients with diabetes. The PROMISE study (NCT03808376) evaluated the accuracy and safety of the next-generation implantable Eversense CGM system for up to 180 days. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study involving 181 subjects with diabetes at 8 USA sites. All subjects were inserted with a primary sensor. Ninety-six subjects had a second sensor, either an identical sensor or a modified sensor (sacrificial boronic acid [SBA]), inserted in their other arm (53 and 43 subjects, respectively). Accuracy was evaluated by comparing CGM to YSI 2300 glucose analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument [YSI]) values during 10 clinic visits (day 1–180). Confirmed event detection rates, calibration stability, sensor survival, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated. Results: For primary sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 92.9%; overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 9.1%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 93% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 56%. Sixty-five percent of the primary sensors survived to 180 days. For the SBA sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 93.9%; overall MARD was 8.5%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 94% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 63%. Ninety percent of the SBA sensors survived to 180 days. No device- or insertion/removal procedure-related SAEs were reported. Conclusion: These data show the next-generation Eversense CGM system had sustained accuracy and safety up to 180 days, with an improved calibration scheme and survival, using the primary or SBA sensors.

Objective To assess the accuracy of a breath ketone analyzer to detect ketosis in adults and children with type 1 diabetes. Research design and methods This is a proof-of-concept, prospective study comparing breath ketone analyzer and blood ketone meter to detect ketosis. Results A total of 500 measurements from 19 adults and children with type 1 diabetes were analyzed. There was a significant association between the breath ketone analyzer and blood ketone meter results in non-fasting adults (p = 0.0066), but not in children (p = 0.4579). In adults, a cut-off of 3.9 PPM on the breath ketone analyzer maximized the Youden Index with an AUC of 0.73. This cut-off for the breath ketone analyzer had 94.7% sensitivity and 54.2% specificity to detect ketosis (≥0.6 mmol/L in blood ketone meter). Conclusions The breath ketone analyzer may be considered as a non-invasive screening tool to rule out ketosis in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Faster-acting insulins, new noninsulin drug classes, more flexible insulin-delivery systems, and improved continuous glucose monitoring devices offer unprecedented opportunities to improve postprandial glucose (PPG) management and overall care for adults with insulin-treated diabetes. These developments led the Endocrine Society to convene a working panel of diabetes experts in December 2018 to assess the current state of PPG management, identify innovative ways to improve self-management and quality of life, and align best practices to current and emerging treatment and monitoring options. Drawing on current research and collective clinical experience, we considered the following issues for the ∼200 million adults worldwide with type 1 and insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes: (i) the role of PPG management in reducing the risk of diabetes complications; (ii) barriers preventing effective PPG management; (iii) strategies to reduce PPG excursions and improve patient quality of life; and (iv) education and clinical tools to support endocrinologists in improving PPG management. We concluded that managing PPG to minimize or prevent diabetes-related complications will require elucidating fundamental questions about optimal ways to quantify and clinically assess the metabolic dysregulation and consequences of the abnormal postprandial state in diabetes and recommend research strategies to address these questions. We also identified practical strategies and tools that are already available to reduce barriers to effective PPG management, optimize use of new and emerging clinical tools, and improve patient self-management and quality of life.

The present study was designed to assess the cardio-protective role of oleic acid in myocardial injury (MI) induced by intra-peritoneal injection of isoprenaline (ISO) in rats for 2 consecutive days. Oleic acid (OA) was administered orally (@ 5 mg/kg b.wt and 10 mg/kg b.wt) for 21 days before inducing MI. Pre-exposure to OA at higher dose significantly improved the HW/BW ratio, myocardial infarct size, lipid profiles (total cholesterol, HDL-C) and cardiac injury biomarkers (LDH, CK-MB, cardiac troponin-I, MMP-9), thus suggesting its cardio-protective role. The ameliorative potential of the higher dose of OA was further substantiated by its ability to reduce the cardiac oxidative stress as evidenced by significant decrease in lipid peroxidation coupled with increase in superoxide dismutase activity and reduced glutathione level. Significant decrease in heart rate as well as increase in RR and QT intervals in oleic acid pre-exposed rats were also observed. OA pre-treatment also reduced the histopathological alterations seen in myocardial injury group rats. The mRNA expression of cardiac UCP-2 gene, a regulator of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, was significantly increased in oleic acid pre-exposure group compared to the ISO-induced myocardial injury group. Thus increase in expression of UCP-2 gene in cardiac tissue seems to be one of the protective measures against myocardial injury. Based on the above findings, it may be inferred that oleic acid possesses promising cardio-protective potential against myocardial injury due to its anti-oxidative property and ability to modulate cardiac metabolic processes.

In view of the limited information available on functional significance of TRPV1 in regulating sperm functions, present study was undertaken on bull spermatozoa. Sixty four ejaculates were collected from four Hariana bulls and were used for molecular and functional characterisation of TRPV1. Immunoblotting using TRPV1 specific antibody revealed the presence of a single band of 104 kDa corresponding to TRPV1 in Hariana bull spermatozoa. Indirect immuno fluorescence revealed positive immune-reactivity to TRPV1 at acrosomal, pre-acrosomal, post acrosomal and flagellar regions of spermatozoa. Based on the results of pilot study dose-response analysis, doses of anandamide (AEA; 0.3 μM) and capsazepine (Cp; 10 μM) were selected for further studies. Three groups of semen samples (control 100 μL diluted semen having 1 × 106 spermatozoa; anandamide (3 μL AEA+97 μL of diluted semen containing 1 × 106 spermatozoa and Cp (1 μL Cp+99 μL of diluted semen containing 1 × 106 spermatozoa) were used to study the functional involvement of TRPV1 in bull spermatozoa. Blocking of TRPV1 with Cp resulted in significant (P

Apparently healthy, eight parturient Sahiwal cows were enrolled and blood samples were collected five times: at enrolment −14, −7, 0 (day of parturition), +7, and +14 days of parturition. Another e...

Objective: To provide a snapshot of the profile of adults and youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States and assessment of longitudinal changes in T1D management and clinical outcomes in the T1D Exchange registry. Research Design and Methods: Data on diabetes management and outcomes from 22,697 registry participants (age 1–93 years) were collected between 2016 and 2018 and compared with data collected in 2010–2012 for 25,529 registry participants. Results: Mean HbA1c in 2016–2018 increased from 65 mmol/mol at the age of 5 years to 78 mmol/mol between ages 15 and 18, with a decrease to 64 mmol/mol by age 28 and 58–63 mmol/mol beyond age 30. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) HbA1c goal of 10-fold in children

Objective: Most insulin infusion sets (ISs) are labeled for 2- or 3-days use. The Medtronic EWIS is designed to increase wear time up to 7 days. This study reports on EWIS survival and performance during the pivotal trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04113694). Method: This multi-center (15), single-arm, non-randomized, non-inferiority trial in 259 participants (18-80yrs) with T1D using the MiniMed™ 670G system (with Humalog™ or Novolog™ insulin) involved wearing a 2- or 3-day IS for 2 weeks (run-in) followed by 12 consecutive EWIS wears (study phase). The latter was worn for ≥174 hours or until set failure. Safety and performance (i.e., a priori target of Result: The EWIS survival rate was 74.8% versus the 67.7% rate of 2- or 3-day ISs (p Conclusion: The 7-day EWIS was safe and its performance was superior at ≥174 hours compared to the performance observed for 2- or 3-day infusion sets. Disclosure B. A. Buckingham: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Tolerion, Inc., Research Support; Self; Beta Bionics, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Tandem Diabetes Care. B. Horowitz: Research Support; Self; Abbott Laboratories, BD, Celgene, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Lilly Diabetes, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc. K. B. Kaiserman: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Consultant; Self; Medtronic, Employee; Self; MannKind Corporation, Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Medtronic, Stock/Shareholder; Self; MannKind Corporation. S. Huang: None. V. Chen: Employee; Self; Medtronic. G. Zhang: Employee; Self; Medtronic. S. Chattaraj: Employee; Self; Medtronic. J. Shin: Employee; Self; Medtronic. R. Vigersky: Employee; Self; Medtronic. R. L. Brazg: Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, Pfizer Inc., Roche Diagnostic USA, Senseonics. T. S. Bailey: Consultant; Self; Abbott Diabetes, LifeScan, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Abbott, Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Livongo, Medtronic, Medtrum Technologies, Novo Nordisk, REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Sanvita, Viacyte, Inc., vTv Therapeutics, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; BD, Medtronic, Sanofi. Y. C. Kudva: Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc. S. K. Garg: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic. G. Grunberger: Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk. J. Thrasher: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Board Member; Self; Medtronic, Consultant; Self; Medtronic, Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Mylan N. V., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Sanofi. A. Cavale: Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic. A. Bhargava: Research Support; Self; Abbott, AbbVie Inc., Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston Therapeutics, Inc., Covance Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Insulet Corporation, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Merck & Co., Inc., Mylan N. V., Novo Nordisk, Poxel SA, Quintiles, Sanofi, Senseonics, Tolerion, Inc., Viking Therapeutics.

Abnormal regulation of glucagon secretion contributes to impaired glycemic control in patients with T1D. We conducted two 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of blocking glucagon action with the glucagon receptor antagonist antibody, volagidemab (VOLA), on glycemic control in patients with T1D. In both trials, participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to weekly subcutaneous injection with placebo (PBO), VOLA 35 mg, or VOLA 70 mg. Participants in Trial 1 (n=75) were unblinded and participants in Trial 2 (n=78) were blinded to the data from the study-provided continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). All participants could monitor glucose values by fingerstick or their own CGM, if these modalities were part of their usual care before the study. In Trial 1, baseline A1C was 7.5% and decreased by 0.39% (PBO), 0.64% (35 mg, p=0.029), and 0.69% (70 mg, p=0.008) at week 12. An A1C target of ≤ 7.0% was achieved in 43% (PBO), 70% (VOLA 35 mg), and 71% (VOLA 70 mg) of participants. Insulin total daily dose (TDD) decreased by 6.3% (PBO), 12.9% (VOLA 35 mg, NS) and 12.2% (VOLA 70 mg, NS) at week 12. In Trial 2, baseline A1C was 7.9% and decreased by 0.03% (PBO), 0.63% (VOLA 35 mg, p=0.001) and 0.66% (VOLA 70 mg, p=0.001). An A1C target of ≤7.0% was achieved in 17% (PBO), 50% (VOLA 35 mg), and 38% (VOLA 70 mg) of participants. Insulin TDD decreased by 3.5% (PBO), 15.1% (VOLA 35 mg, NS), and 10.2% (VOLA 70 mg, NS). A majority of adverse events were Grade 2 or lower in severity. Intermittent Increases in BP and ALT were observed in VOLA vs. placebo participants during the dosing period and returned to BL after treatment discontinuation. These data demonstrate that treatment with VOLA 35 mg or 70 mg once weekly as an adjunct to insulin is safe, well-tolerated, and decreases A1C with a trend toward decreased insulin dosing in people with T1D. Disclosure J. Pettus: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Consultant; Self; Diasome Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Lilly Diabetes, MannKind Corporation, Tandem Diabetes Care. B. W. Bode: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Consultant; Self; Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., Companion Medical, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Abvance Therapeutics, Dexcom, Inc., Diasome Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Dompe, Eli Lilly and Company, Eyenuk, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Jaeb Center for Health Research, Medtronic, Nova Biomedical, Novo Nordisk, Provention Bio, Inc., REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Senseonics, Viacyte, Inc., vTv Therapeutics, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Stock/Shareholder; Self; AgaMatrix, Aseko, Inc., Glytec, LLC. E. D. Bautista: Consultant; Self; REMD Biotherapeutics. H. Yan: Board Member; Self; REMD Biotherapeutics, Other Relationship; Spouse/Partner; REMD Biotherapeutics. D. Thai: Employee; Self; REMD Biotherapeutics. S. K. Garg: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic. S. Klein: Advisory Panel; Self; Altimmune, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., ProSciento, Research Support; Self; Janssen Research & Development, LLC. S. C. Boeder: Consultant; Self; Cecelia Health, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc. M. P. Christiansen: Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Inc., Viacyte, Inc. D. S. Denham: None. T. S. Bailey: Consultant; Self; Abbott Diabetes, LifeScan, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Abbott, Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Livongo, Medtronic, Medtrum Technologies, Novo Nordisk, REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Sanvita, Viacyte, Inc., vTv Therapeutics, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; BD, Medtronic, Sanofi. H. K. Akturk: Consultant; Self; American Diabetes Association, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, IM Therapeutics, MannKind Corporation, REMD Biotherapeutics, Senseonics, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; American Diabetes Association. L. J. Klaff: Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Dong-A ST Co. Ltd., Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer Inc., REMD Biotherapeutics. J. Rosenstock: Board Member; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, Consultant; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc., Novo No

Background: The prospective, multi-center PROMISE study evaluated the safety and accuracy of the next generation Eversense CGM System for up to 180 days in 181 adults with diabetes at 8 US clinical sites. Methods: Accuracy was evaluated by comparing CGM and reference values from Yellow Springs Instruments (YSI) during 10 clinic visits from day 1-180, which included hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia challenges. Eighty-five and 96 subjects had 1 and 2 sensors inserted in the arm, respectively, with 2 replaced sensors for 279 sensors (558 insertions/removals). The CGM prompts 2 calibrations/day to day 21, after which it primarily prompts 1 calibration/day. Results: The Table shows accuracy analyses based on 49,613 matched pairs over 180 days. Percent CGM readings within 15/15% and 20/20% of YSI values was 85.6% and 92.9%, respectively, and the MARD was 9.1%. MARDs across different glucose ranges from 40-400 mg/dL were ≤9.4% (Table). The confirmed hypoglycemia detection rates at 70mg/dL and 60 mg/dL were 93% and 87%, respectively. Hyperglycemia at 180mg/dL was detected in 99%. There were no device or insertion/removal procedure-related serious adverse events. Two mild skin infections occurred for a rate of 0.36% per procedure. Conclusion: These results indicate the next generation Eversense long-term implantable CGM System has sustained accuracy and safety up to 180 days with primarily one calibration/day. Disclosure S. K. Garg: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic. A. D. Dehennis: Employee; Self; Senseonics. K. Tweden: Employee; Self; Senseonics. F. R. Kaufman: Advisory Panel; Self; Virta Health Corp., Employee; Self; Senseonics, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Medtronic. D. R. Liljenquist: Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, AbbVie Inc., Ascensia Diabetes Care, Dexcom, Inc., Drawbridge Health, Inc., Eyenuk, Inc., Jaeb Center for Health Research, Medtronic, Provention Bio, Inc., Senseonics. B. W. Bode: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Consultant; Self; Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., Companion Medical, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Abvance Therapeutics, Dexcom, Inc., Diasome Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Dompe, Eli Lilly and Company, Eyenuk, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Jaeb Center for Health Research, Medtronic, Nova Biomedical, Novo Nordisk, Provention Bio, Inc., REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Senseonics, Viacyte, Inc., vTv Therapeutics, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Stock/Shareholder; Self; AgaMatrix, Aseko, Inc., Glytec, LLC. M. P. Christiansen: Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Inc., Viacyte, Inc. T. S. Bailey: Consultant; Self; Abbott Diabetes, LifeScan, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Abbott, Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Livongo, Medtronic, Medtrum Technologies, Novo Nordisk, REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Sanvita, Viacyte, Inc., vTv Therapeutics, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; BD, Medtronic, Sanofi. R. L. Brazg: Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, Pfizer Inc., Roche Diagnostic USA, Senseonics. D. S. Denham: None. A. Chang: None. H. K. Akturk: Consultant; Self; American Diabetes Association, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, IM Therapeutics, MannKind Corporation, REMD Biotherapeutics, Senseonics, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; American Diabetes Association. Funding Senseonics, Inc.

Objective: Most insulin infusion sets (ISs) are labeled for 2- or 3-days use. The Medtronic EWIS is designed to increase wear time up to 7 days, and demonstrated a 74.8% survival rate (77.8%, excluding inadvertent early removal) in the pivotal trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04113694). This study reports on study participant satisfaction during the EWIS pivotal trial. Method: This multi-center (15), single-arm, non-randomized, non-inferiority trial in 259 participants (18-80yrs) with T1D using the MiniMed™ 670G system (with Humalog™ or Novolog™ insulin) involved wearing a 2- or 3-day IS for 2 weeks (run-in) followed by 12 consecutive EWIS wears (study phase). The latter was worn for ≥174 hours or until set failure. Participants completed a Medtronic Likert-based questionnaire at baseline and study exit. The averaged paired change in score at study-baseline was determined (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Result: Reported satisfaction data during 2- or 3-day IS versus EWIS wear (Figure) show that ease and convenience of use, comfort, wear duration and time required to change a set were significantly improved with EWIS (p Conclusion: These findings point to significantly greater satisfaction with the EWIS when compared with a 2- or 3-day IS, which may result in reduced care burden and improved adherence. Disclosure R. L. Brazg: Research Support; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, Pfizer Inc., Roche Diagnostic USA, Senseonics. B. Horowitz: Research Support; Self; Abbott Laboratories, BD, Celgene, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Lilly Diabetes, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc. K. B. Kaiserman: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Consultant; Self; Medtronic, Employee; Self; MannKind Corporation, Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Medtronic, Stock/Shareholder; Self; MannKind Corporation. S. Huang: None. V. Chen: Employee; Self; Medtronic. G. Zhang: Employee; Self; Medtronic. S. Chattaraj: Employee; Self; Medtronic. J. Shin: Employee; Self; Medtronic. R. Vigersky: Employee; Self; Medtronic. T. S. Bailey: Consultant; Self; Abbott Diabetes, LifeScan, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Abbott, Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Livongo, Medtronic, Medtrum Technologies, Novo Nordisk, REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Sanvita, Viacyte, Inc., vTv Therapeutics, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; BD, Medtronic, Sanofi. Y. C. Kudva: Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc. S. K. Garg: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic. G. Grunberger: Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk. A. Cavale: Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic. J. Thrasher: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Board Member; Self; Medtronic, Consultant; Self; Medtronic, Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Mylan N. V., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Sanofi. A. Bhargava: Research Support; Self; Abbott, AbbVie Inc., Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston Therapeutics, Inc., Covance Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Insulet Corporation, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Merck & Co., Inc., Mylan N. V., Novo Nordisk, Poxel SA, Quintiles, Sanofi, Senseonics, Tolerion, Inc., Viking Therapeutics. B. A. Buckingham: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Tolerion, Inc., Research Support; Self; Beta Bionics, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Tandem Diabetes Care.

Globally, coffee is consumed as a functional beverage due to its nutraceutical value and positive physiological effects. Coffee is an important source of several nutritious and therapeutic phytoconstituents including lipids, carbohydrates, minerals, vitamins, and nitrogenous compounds, along with bioactive compounds like cafestol and kahweol diterpenes, caffeine, and chlorogenic acid (CGA), which all possess great therapeutic potential. Coffee is claimed to be an ancient wonder drug that is endowed with a variety of phytobiomolecules of therapeutic potential. The bioavailability of green coffee beans (GCB) and their active principles need to be ameliorated by modern nanoencapsulation and coffee capsule techniques. The role of CGA, caffeine, and other components in a variety of ailments such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, hepatitis, obesity, neurodegenerative disorders, and cardiovascular diseases has been well documented and supported using a mechanistic rationale. Furthermore, the risk–benefit ratio and health assessment need to be speculated on in the light of toxicological interventions and fortification of GCB with different permutations and combinations that could be obtained in the future.

Objective: Evaluate the effect of sotagliflozin, a dual inhibitor of sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 1 and 2, on arterial stiffness in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with sotagliflozin as adjunct to optimized insulin therapy. Methods: In this post hoc analysis, indirect markers of arterial stiffness, including pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and double product, were calculated using observed systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), or pulse rate at 24 weeks using data from a pooled patient population from the inTandem1 and inTandem2 randomized controlled trials ( n = 1575). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. Relative to placebo at Week 24, sotagliflozin 200 mg and 400 mg reduced SBP by 2.03 mm Hg (95% CI −3.30 to −0.75; p = 0.0019) and 2.85 mm Hg (−4.12 to −1.57; p Conclusion: In adults with T1D, adding sotagliflozin to insulin significantly reduced blood pressure and other markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance.

Cell-based therapy has emerged as promising strategy for chronic and impaired wounds treatment. Current research is focused on developing biomaterial systems that act as a niche for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to promote wound healing through paracrine molecular cascading. This study was aimed to evaluate the wound healing potential of Velgraft, a ready-to-use biodegradable artificial skin substitute, on excision wound in goats.Twelve male goats were randomized divided in to three groups of four animals each. After infliction of surgical wound, Velgraft and Soframycin were applied on wounds of the animals of Groups II and III while Group I (sham operated) served as control. Wound diameters were measured at pre-defined time-points for determination of progressive wound healing up to 28 days. Skin sections were stained using Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for examining the histoarchitectural changes, Masson trichome staining for ascertaining collagen synthesis and immunohistochemistry for expression of CD31, VEGF and TGF-β1 proteins to determine post-treatment angiogenesis in the inflicted wounds.Velgraft application appreciably enhanced wound closure by day 21 which was confirmed through restoration of the normal skin architecture as evident based on histopathological examination and characterized by complete regeneration of epidermal layers, collagen fibers, blood capillaries and hair follicular formation. Stimulation of angiogenesis markers was also observed at different time-points post-Velgraft application; which is suggestive of the improved angiogenesis and vasculogenesis.Velgraft facilitates wound healing by augmenting early wound closure, enhancing collagen synthesis and deposition, trichosis development and promoting revascularization and epidermal layers restoration.