Search

Perls Prussian blue stain (PPB) for hemosiderin, a marker of vascular injury is often employed as an adjunct in the diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathies. However, inflammation/vascular injury is also seen in leprosy, immune mediated, paraproteinemic, diabetic neuropathies, etc. The frequency of detection of hemosiderin in these neuropathies and its utility in diagnosis of vasculitis has not been explored.We evaluated 208 peripheral nerve biopsies for hemosiderin deposits by PPB stain in vasculitis (78) and compared with inflammatory/immune neuropathies [leprous neuritis-32, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)-15, paraproteinemic neuropathies (POEMS)-12, diabetic neuropathy-37] and nonimmune neuropathies [Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease-15, vitamin B12 deficiency-7, and ischemic neuropathy in aged-12)].Hemosiderin deposits were most frequent in vasculitis (48.72%) [59.2% in systemic; 43.1% in nonsystemic vasculitides] and enhanced the sensitivity of diagnosis in "probable" vasculitis (34.48%) that lacked transmural inflammation. Hemosiderin was also detected in infectious/immune-mediated neuropathies (leprous neuritis-56%, POEMS-33.3%, diabetes-18.9%) but absent in CMT, B12 deficiency, and ischemic neuropathy. Hemosiderin deposits involved epineurium in vasculitis, compared to endoneurial/perineurial location in leprosy and perineurial in POEMS and diabetic neuropathy. The sensitivity of detection was high in vasculitic neuropathy (49.35%) compared to other inflammatory neuropathies (22.3%) (P0.05) with high specificity (77.69% [positive predictive value (PPV)-56.71%; negative predictive value (NPV)-71.6%]. The specificity increased to 89% if leprous neuropathy was excluded, with PPV-77.5% while NPV dropped to 68.5%.These findings suggest that PPB stain for detection of hemosiderin is a useful adjunct in diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy with high specificity but low sensitivity.

Background: Congenital myopathies (CMs) though considered distinct disorders, simultaneous occurrence of central nucleus, nemaline rods, and cores in the same biopsy are scarcely reported. Objective: A retrospective reassessment of cases diagnosed as CMs to look for multiple pathologies missed, if any, during the initial diagnosis. Materials and Methods: Enzyme histochemical, and immunohistochemical-stained slides from 125 cases diagnosed as congenital myopathy were reassessed. Results: The study revealed 15 cases (12%) of congenital myopathy with more than one morphological feature. Central nucleus with cores (n = 11), central nucleus, nemaline rods and cores (n = 3), and nemaline rods with cores (n = 1). 4/11 cases were diagnosed as centronuclear myopathy (CNM) in the first instance; in addition, cores were revealed on reassessment. Discussion: The prevalence of CMs of all neuromuscular disorders is approximately 6 in 100,000 live births, with regional variations. Three main defined CMs include centro nuclear myopathy (CNM), nemaline rod myopathy (NRM), and central core disease (CCD). However, they are more diverse with overlapping clinical and histopathological features, thus broadening the spectra within each category of congenital myopathy. Conclusion: Identification of cases with overlap of pathological features has diagnostic relevance.