Search

Objectives Accurate determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important. Several endogenous biomarkers exist for estimating GFR, yet, they have limited accuracy, especially in the paediatric population. Proenkephalin A 119–159 (PENK) is a novel and promising GFR marker, but its relation with age in children remains unknown. Also, the value of PENK has never been validated against measured GFR (mGFR) in children when compared to traditional GFR markers including serum creatinine (SCr), SCr-based estimated GFR (eGFR) and cystatin C (cysC). Methods Critically ill children and term-born neonates were included in this single-centre, prospective study. Iohexol-based mGFR, SCr, and cysC were determined in each patient. eGFR was calculated using the bedside Schwartz equation, incorporating SCr and height. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlation between mGFR and PENK, SCr, cysC and eGFR. Results For 97 patients (56 children and 41 neonates), mGFR, SCr, cysC and PENK levels were available. PENK levels were higher in young children and decreased to adult PENK reference values around two years of age. PENK levels were highly correlated with mGFR (ρ=−0.88, p Conclusions The correlation of PENK with mGFR was as good as SCr-based eGFR-mGFR correlation. To determine the added value of PENK in paediatric clinical care and prior to implementation, PENK reference values are needed and the development and validation of a paediatric PENK-based eGFR equation is necessary.

Contains fulltext : 287166.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Many drugs are still prescribed off-label to the pediatric population. Although off-label drug use not supported by high level of evidence is potentially harmful, a comprehensive overview of the quality of the evidence pertaining off-label drug use in children is lacking. The Dutch Pediatric Formulary (DPF) provides best evidence-based dosing guidelines for drugs used in children. For each drug-indication-age group combination-together compiling one record-we scored the highest available level of evidence: labeled use, systematic review or meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparative research, noncomparative research, or consensus-based expert opinions. For records based on selected guidelines, the original sources were not reviewed. These records were scored as guideline. A total of 774 drugs were analyzed comprising a total of 6,426 records. Of all off-label records (n = 2,718), 14% were supported by high quality evidence (4% meta-analysis or systematic reviews, 10% RCTs of high quality), 20% by comparative research, 14% by noncomparative research, 37% by consensus-based expert opinions, and 15% by selected guidelines. Fifty-eight percent of all records were authorized, increasing with age from 30% in preterm neonates (n = 110) up to 64% in adolescents (n = 1,630). Many have advocated that off-label use is only justified when supported by a high level of evidence. We show that this prerequisite would seriously limit available drug treatment for children as the underlying evidence is low across ages and drug classes. Our data identify the drugs and therapeutic areas for which evidence is clearly missing and could drive the global research agenda.

Contains fulltext : 287165.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More than half of all drugs are still prescribed off-label to children. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data are needed to support off-label dosing, however for many drugs such data are either sparse or not representative. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are increasingly used to study PK and guide dosing decisions. Building compound models to study PK requires expertise and is time-consuming. Therefore, in this paper, we studied the feasibility of predicting pediatric exposure by pragmatically combining existing compound models, developed e.g. for studies in adults, with a pediatric and preterm physiology model. METHODS: Seven drugs, with various PK characteristics, were selected (meropenem, ceftazidime, azithromycin, propofol, midazolam, lorazepam, and caffeine) as a proof of concept. Simcyp(®) v20 was used to predict exposure in adults, children, and (pre)term neonates, by combining an existing compound model with relevant virtual physiology models. Predictive performance was evaluated by calculating the ratios of predicted-to-observed PK parameter values (0.5- to 2-fold acceptance range) and by visual predictive checks with prediction error values. RESULTS: Overall, model predicted PK in infants, children and adolescents capture clinical data. Confidence in PBPK model performance was therefore considered high. Predictive performance tends to decrease when predicting PK in the (pre)term neonatal population. CONCLUSION: Pragmatic PBPK modeling in pediatrics, based on compound models verified with adult data, is feasible. A thorough understanding of the model assumptions and limitations is required, before model-informed doses can be recommended for clinical use.

Contains fulltext : 291086.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling can be an attractive tool to increase the evidence base of pediatric drug dosing recommendations by making optimal use of existing pharmacokinetic (PK) data. A pragmatic approach of combining available compound models with a virtual pediatric physiology model can be a rational solution to predict PK and hence support dosing guidelines for children in real-life clinical care, when it can also be employed by individuals with little experience in PBPK modeling. This comes within reach as user-friendly PBPK modeling platforms exist and, for many drugs and populations, models are ready for use. We have identified a list of drugs that can serve as a starting point for pragmatic PBPK modeling to address current clinical dosing needs. 01 januari 2023

The disposition of a drug is driven by various processes, such as drug metabolism, drug transport, glomerular filtration and body composition. These processes are subject to developmental changes reflecting growth and maturation along the paediatric continuum. However, knowledge gaps exist on these changes and their clinical impact. Filling these gaps may aid better prediction of drug disposition and creation of age-appropriate dosing guidelines. We present innovative approaches to study these developmental changes in relation to drug metabolism and transport. First, analytical methods such as including liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for proteomic analyses allow quantitation of the expressions of a wide variety of proteins, e.g. membrane transporters, in a small piece of organ tissue. The latter is specifically important for paediatric research, where tissues are scarcely available. Second, innovative study designs using radioactive labelled microtracers allowed study-without risk for the child-of the oral bioavailability of compounds used as markers for certain drug metabolism pathways. Third, the use of modelling and simulation to support dosing recommendations for children is supported by both the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration. This may even do away with the need for a paediatric trial. Physiologically based pharmacokinetics models, which include age-specific physiological information are, therefore, increasingly being used, not only to aid paediatric drug development but also to improve existing drug therapies. ispartof: BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY vol:88 issue:10 pages:4285-4296 ispartof: location:England status: published

Contains fulltext : 287164.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Little is known about the impact of age on the processes governing human intestinal drug absorption. The Ussing chamber is a system to study drug transport across tissue barriers, but it has not been used to study drug absorption processes in children. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of the Ussing chamber methodology to assess pediatric intestinal drug absorption. Furthermore, differences between intestinal drug transport processes of children and adults were explored as well as the possible impact of age. Fresh terminal ileal leftover tissues from both children and adults were collected during surgery and prepared for Ussing chamber experiments. Paracellular (enalaprilat), transcellular (propranolol), and carrier-mediated drug transport by MDR1 (talinolol) and BCRP (rosuvastatin) were determined with the Ussing chamber methodology. We calculated apparent permeability coefficients and efflux ratios and explored their relationship with postnatal age. The success rate for the Ussing chamber experiments, as determined by electrophysiological measurements, was similar between children (58%, N = 15, median age: 44 weeks; range 8 weeks to 17 years) and adults (67%, N = 13). Mean serosal to mucosal transport of talinolol by MDR1 and rosuvastatin by BCRP was higher in adult than in pediatric tissues (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0091). In contrast, within our pediatric cohort, there was no clear correlation for efflux transport across different ages. In conclusion, the Ussing chamber is a suitable model to explore pediatric intestinal drug absorption and can be used to further elucidate ontogeny of individual intestinal pharmacokinetic processes like drug metabolism and transport.

Introduction: Off-label drug use in the paediatric population is common, and the lack of high-quality efficacy studies poses patients at risk for failing pharmacotherapy. Next to efficacy studies, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are increasingly used to inform paediatric dose selection. As resources for paediatric trials are limited, we aimed to summarize existing PK and efficacy studies to identify knowledge gaps in available evidence supporting paediatric dosing recommendations, thereby taking paediatric cardiovascular drugs as proof of concept. Methods: For each cardiovascular drug, paediatric indication and prespecified age group, together comprising one record, the authorized state was assessed. Next, for off-label records, the highest level of evidence was scored. High-quality efficacy studies were defined as meta-analysis or randomized controlled trials. Other comparative research, noncomparative research or consensus-based expert opinions were considered low quality. The level of evidence for PK studies was scored per drug and per age group, but regardless of indication. Results: A total of 58 drugs included 417 records, of which 279 (67%) were off-label. Of all off-label records, the majority (81%) were not supported by high-quality efficacy studies, but for 140 of these records (62%) high-quality PK studies were available. Conclusion: We demonstrated that for the majority of off-label cardiovascular drugs, only low-quality efficacy studies were available. However, high-quality PK studies were frequently available. Combining these PK data with extrapolation of efficacy data from adults may help to close the current information gap and prioritize the drugs for which clinical studies and safety data are urgently needed.

Neonatal drug information (DI) is essential for safe and effective pharmacotherapy in (pre)term neonates. Such information is usually absent from drug labels, making formularies a crucial part of the neonatal clinician’s toolbox. Several formularies exist worldwide, but they have never been fully mapped or compared for content, structure and workflow. The objective of this review was to identify neonatal formularies, explore (dis)similarities, and raise awareness of their existence. Neonatal formularies were identified through self-acquaintance, experts and structured search. A questionnaire was sent to all identified formularies to provide details on formulary function. An original extraction tool was employed to collect DI from the formularies on the 10 most commonly used drugs in pre(term) neonates. Eight different neonatal formularies were identified worldwide (Europe, USA, Australia-New Zealand, Middle East). Six responded to the questionnaire and were compared for structure and content. Each formulary has its own workflow, monograph template and style, and update routine. Focus on certain aspects of DI also varies, as well as the type of initiative and funding. Clinicians should be aware of the various formularies available and their differences in characteristics and content to use them properly for the benefit of their patients.

ZusammenfassungTrotz verbesserter gesetzlicher Rahmenbedingungen bei der Entwicklung von Arzneimitteln (AM) für Kinder bestehen für viele pädiatrische Therapiebereiche und v. a. die jüngsten Altersgruppen immer noch große Defizite in der AM-Versorgung. Daher müssen viele AM für Kinder außerhalb der Zulassung (off-label) und somit ohne pädiatrische Fachinformationen angewendet werden. Dadurch besteht ein erhöhtes Risiko für inadäquate Dosierungen sowie fehlende oder unerwünschte Wirkungen. In der Off-label-Anwendung haben Verschreibende eine erhöhte Verantwortung, auf die bestverfügbare Evidenz zurückzugreifen, um altersentsprechende Dosierungen zu wählen sowie Nutzen und Risiko zu bewerten. Dieser Verantwortung können einzelne Verschreibende kaum gerecht werden, weil die wenigen verfügbaren pädiatrischen Daten oft von heterogener Qualität und nicht unmittelbar verfügbar sind.Das internationale Konsortium von Kinderformularien stellt eine Kollaboration in derzeit vier europäischen Ländern dar (Niederlande, Deutschland, Österreich, Norwegen) dar und baut auf dem niederländischen Kinderformularium auf. Das Konsortium hält AM-Informationen für Kinder und Jugendliche, basierend auf bestverfügbarer Evidenz, bereit; diese werden anhand von systematischen Recherchen, kritischen Evaluationen, ExpertInnenreviews, internationaler Harmonisierung sowie regelmäßigen Aktualisierungen erstellt und transparent referenziert. Die Plattform ist webbasiert und Nutzern in der jeweiligen Landessprache frei zugänglich.Das internationale Konsortium von Kinderformularien bietet die Grundlage der Off-label-Anwendung von AM bei Kindern und Jugendlichen, um nach bestverfügbarer Evidenz altersentsprechende Dosierungen zu wählen sowie Nutzen und Risiko abzuwägen.

ObjectiveWhen infants suffer from nasal congestion, xylometazoline spray or drops can be effective to facilitate breathing and drinking. However, case reports on side effects have resulted in international warnings regarding use of xylometazoline in infants. Nevertheless, the incidence of these side effects in hospitalised infants is unknown.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingTeaching hospital between 2017 and 2021.PatientsInfants under 2 years of age.ExposureReceiving either saline-only (unlimited frequency, concentration 0.9%) or in combination with xylometazoline (maximum three times daily, concentration 0.025%).Main outcome measuresPredefined potential side effects (events), including among others apnoea, nausea, bradycardia, cyanosis and nosebleeds, were extracted from patient records, and the probability to be caused by saline only or xylometazoline–saline was determined using the ADR Probability Scale.ResultsWe included 898 admitted children during 1285 treatment episodes who received saline with or without xylometazoline. 26 events occurred in the saline-only group (incidence 20.0/100 treatment episodes), and 117 events occurred in the xylometazoline saline group (incidence of 10.5/100 treatment episodes), which was significantly lower (OR 0.47 95% CI 0.29 to 0.75, p=0.002). No definite linked or life-threatening events were found. Three nosebleeds had a probable link to the use of xylometazoline–saline, and all other events could only possibly be linked to saline-only or xylometazoline saline use. The incidence of all events was higher in the saline-only group as compared with the xylometazoline saline group, except nausea, which had a similar occurrence (p=0.65). Results were very similar across (gestational) age groups, gender and reasons for admission.ConclusionThe use of low-dose xylometazoline seems to be safe in hospitalised infants.

Contains fulltext : 291434.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Many medicines are used "off-label" in children outside the terms of the license. Feasible pediatric clinical trials are a challenge to design. Conect4children (c4c) is an Innovative Medicines Initiative project to set up a pan-European pediatric clinical trial network aiming to facilitate the development of new medicines for children. To optimize pediatric trial development by promoting innovative trial design, c4c set up a European multidisciplinary advice service, including the voice of young patients and families, tailored to industry and academia. A network of experts was established to provide multidisciplinary advice to trial sponsors. Experts were selected to join clinical and innovative methodology expert groups. A patient and public involvement (PPI) database, to include the expert opinion of patients and parents/carers was formed. A stepwise process was developed: (1) sponsors contact c4c, (2) scoping interview takes place, (3) ad hoc advice group formed, (5) advice meeting held, and (6) advice report provided. Feedback on the process was collected. Twenty-four clinical and innovative methodology expert groups (>400 experts) and a PPI database of 135 registrants were established. As of September 30, 2022, 36 advice requests were received, with 25 requests completed. Clinical and methodology experts and PPI representatives participated in several advice requests. Sponsors appreciated the advice quality and the multidisciplinary experts from different countries, including experts not known before. Experts and PPI participants were generally satisfied with the process. The c4c project has shown successful proof of concept for a service that presents a new framework to plan innovative and feasible pediatric trials.

Contains fulltext : 242767.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Drug disposition in children is different compared to adults. Growth and developmental change the processes involved in drug disposition and efficacy, including membrane transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes, but for many of these proteins, the exact changes have not been fully elucidated to date. Quantitative proteomics offers a solution to analyze many DME and DT proteins at once and can be performed with very small tissue samples, overcoming many of the challenges previously limiting research in this pediatric field. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based methods for quantification of (membrane) proteins has evolved as a golden standard for proteomic analysis. The last years, big steps have been made in maturation studies of hepatic and renal drug transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes using this method. Protein and organ specific maturation patterns have been identified for the human liver and kidney, which aids pharmacological modelling and predicting drug dosing in the pediatric population. Further research should focus on other organs, like intestine and brain, as well as on innovative methods in which proteomics can be used to further overcome the limited access to pediatric tissues, including liquid biopsies and organoids. In this review there is aimed to provide an overview of available human pediatric proteomics data, discuss its challenges and provide guidance for future research.

Most drugs are administered to children orally. An information gap remains on the protein abundance of small intestinal drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) and drug transporters (DTs) across the pediatric age range, which hinders precision dosing in children. To explore age-related differences in DMEs and DTs, surgical leftover intestinal tissues from pediatric and adult jejunum and ileum were collected and analyzed by targeted quantitative proteomics for apical sodium–bile acid transporter, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1), multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1), multidrug resistance–associated protein (MRP) 2, MRP3, organic anion–transporting polypeptide 2B1, organic cation transporter 1, peptide transporter 1 (PEPT1), CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, UDP glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1, UGT1A10, and UGT2B7. Samples from 58 children (48 ileums, 10 jejunums, age range: 8 weeks to 17 years) and 16 adults (8 ileums, 8 jejunums) were analyzed. When comparing age groups, BCRP, MDR1, PEPT1, and UGT1A1 abundance was significantly higher in adult ileum as compared with the pediatric ileum. Jejunal BCRP, MRP2, UGT1A1, and CYP3A4 abundance was higher in the adults compared with children 0–2 years of age. Examining the data on a continuous age scale showed that PEPT1 and UGT1A1 abundance was significantly higher, whereas MCT1 and UGT2B7 abundance was lower in adult ileum as compared with the pediatric ileum. Our data contribute to the deeper understanding of the ontogeny of small intestinal drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters and shows DME-, DT-, and intestinal location–specific, age-related changes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This is the first study that describes the ontogeny of small intestinal DTs and DMEs in human using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry–based targeted quantitative proteomics. The current analysis provides a detailed picture about the maturation of DT and DME abundances in the human jejunum and ileum. The presented results supply age-related DT and DME abundance data for building more accurate PBPK models that serve to support safer and more efficient drug dosing regimens for the pediatric population.

Background and Objective Ceftriaxone is a cornerstone antibiotic for critically ill children with severe infections. Despite its widespread use, information on the pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone is lacking in this population. We aimed to determine ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics in critically ill children and to propose ceftriaxone dosing guidelines resulting in adequate target attainment using population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation. Methods Critically ill children (aged 0–18 years) treated with intravenous ceftriaxone (100 mg/kg once daily, infused in 30 minutes) and a central or arterial line in place were eligible. Opportunistic blood sampling for total and unbound ceftriaxone concentrations was used. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling on NONMEM™ Version 7.4.3. Simulations were performed to select optimal doses using probability of target attainment for two pharmacokinetic targets of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) reflecting the susceptibility of pathogens (f T > MIC 100% and fT > 4 × MIC 100%). Results Two hundred and five samples for total and 43 time-matched samples for unbound plasma ceftriaxone concentrations were collected from 45 patients, median age 2.5 (range 0.1–16.7) years. A two-compartment model with bodyweight as the co-variate for volume of distribution and clearance, and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate as an additional covariate for clearance, best described ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics. For a typical patient (2.5 years, 14 kg) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 80 mL/min/1.73 m2, the current 100-mg/kg once-daily dose results in a probability of target attainment of 96.8% and 60.8% for a MIC of 0.5 mg/L and 4 × MIC (2 mg/L), respectively, when using fT > MIC 100% as a target. For a 50-mg/kg twice-daily regimen, the probability of target attainment was 99.9% and 93.4%, respectively. Conclusions The current dosing regimen of ceftriaxone provides adequate exposure for susceptible pathogens in most critically ill children. In patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of > 80 mL/min/1.73 m2 or in areas with a high prevalence of less-susceptible pathogens (MIC ≥ 0.5 mg/L), a twice-daily dosing regimen of 50 mg/kg can be considered to improve target attainment. Clinical Trial Registration POPSICLE study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03248349, registered 14 August, 2017), PERFORM study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03502993, registered 19 April, 2018). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-021-01035-9.

Contains fulltext : 238745.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) A drug is granted a license for use after a thorough assessment of risks and benefits based on high-quality scientific proof of its efficacy and safety. Many drugs that are relevant to children are not licensed for use in this population implying that a thorough assessment of risks and benefits in the pediatric population has not been made at all, implying a negative risk-benefit balance in children, or implying insufficient information to establish the risk-benefit balance. Use of drugs without positive assessment of risks and benefits exposes children to potential lack of efficacy, unknown toxicity, and harm. To aid guideline committees and individual prescribers, we here present a tutorial of the Benefit and Risk Assessment for Off-label use (BRAvO) decision framework. This pragmatic framework offers a structured assessment of benefits and risks of off-label drug use, including a clinical pharmacological based approach to age-appropriate dose selection. As proof of concept and to illustrate the practical use, we have applied the framework to assess benefits and risks of off-label use of ondansetron for gastroenteritis-induced nausea and vomiting. The framework could also guide decisions on off-label use in other special populations (e.g., pregnant women, elderly, obese, or critically ill patients) where off-label drug use is frequent, thereby contributing to effective and safe pharmacotherapy.

Item does not contain fulltext 01 juni 2023

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) and augmented renal clearance (ARC), both alterations of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), are prevalent in critically ill children and neonates. AKI and ARC prevalence estimates are based on estimation of GFR (eGFR) using serum creatinine (SCr), which is known to be inaccurate. We aimed to test our hypothesis that AKI prevalence will be higher and ARC prevalence will be lower in critically ill children when using iohexol-based measured GFR (mGFR), rather than using eGFR. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the performance of different SCr-based eGFR methods. Methods In this single-center prospective study, critically ill term-born neonates and children were included. mGFR was calculated using a plasma disappearance curve after parenteral administration of iohexol. AKI diagnosis was based on the KDIGO criteria, SCr-based eGFR, and creatinine clearance (CrCL). Differences between eGFR and mGFR were determined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and by calculating bias and accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within 30% of mGFR values). Results One hundred five children, including 43 neonates, were included. AKI prevalence was higher based on mGFR (48%), than with KDIGO or eGFR (11–40%). ARC prevalence was lower with mGFR (24%) compared to eGFR (38–51%). eGFR equations significantly overestimated mGFR (60–71 versus 41 ml/min/1.73 m2, p Conclusion Iohexol-based AKI prevalence was higher and ARC prevalence lower compared to standard SCr-based eGFR methods. Age- and sex-dependent equations for eGFR (eGFR-Smeets for neonates and eGFR-Pierce for children) best approached measured GFR and should preferably be used to optimize diagnosis of AKI and ARC in this population. Graphical Abstract A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information

IntroductionIncreased plasma renin activity (PRA) levels may have various causes: PRA has gained importance as prognostic marker for patients with heart failure; age may have an influence on endogenous PRA levels; and ACE inhibitor (ACEi) treatment can also interfere with PRA levels. We aimed to investigate PRA levels in very young children with heart failure, with and without ACEi treatment.MethodsAs part of a PK-PD study of enalapril for pediatric heart failure (LENA studies), blood samples were collected and analyzed for PRA levels before, 4 hours after and within the first week of enalapril treatment. In addition, a literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA concept in MEDLINE to identify studies on PRA levels in healthy children as well as in children with heart failure in the age range from 1 day up to 2 years. Comparison was performed with LENA study data and with data from 9 healthy volunteers.ResultsInfants from LENA studies with heart failure (n= 35, aged 25 days – 2.1 years) had median PRA levels of 19.7 (n=35) before, 29.0 (n=34, p>0.05) 4 hours after enalapril dose, and 89.1 ng/mL/h (n=29, pConclusionsVery young children had higher endogenous PRA levels compared to adults. Heart failure at this age was associated with even higher PRA levels and ACEi treatment further increased PRA levels. These results indicate that patients appear to respond to ACEi treatment but question the value of PRA levels as prognostic marker in this population.

Contains fulltext : 232104.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) The need for information about new and existing drugs used in children was recognized in the European Union (EU) with the implementation of the Paediatric Regulation in 2007. In 2017, the 10-year review of the Paediatric Regulation identified barriers to the conduct of clinical trials, including delays in setting up and completing paediatric trials. Across Europe, the difficulties with clinical research are compounded by variation within countries and between countries. Ethics and regulatory review have national specificities. This paper describes the Collaborative Network for European Clinical Trials for Children (conect4children, c4c), which addresses selected difficulties in the design and conduct of paediatric clinical trials. c4c is a time-limited public-private consortium funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI2). The elements of c4c are as follows: expert advice providing input on study design and/or paediatric development programmes (including patient involvement activities); a network of sites following harmonised procedures coordinated by National Hubs and a single point of contact for Europe; a facility for education and training for sites and trial teams; and support for managing data used by the network and a common paediatric data dictionary. c4c does not sponsor trials. c4c is taking a phased approach with careful piloting through industry and non-industry studies intended to demonstrate the viability of the network (proof-of-viability studies). c4c uses a co-design approach involving industry and academics within a clearly defined scope. A sustainable, successor organization open to all potential service users will be open for business before the end of IMI2 funding in 2024.

The purpose of this study was to compare long-term neurocognitive functioning (working memory, processing speed, and attention) between children who had been treated with either propranolol or atenolol for infantile hemangioma during infancy. All eligible children (n = 158) aged 6 years or older and treated with propranolol or atenolol as infants were invited to participate in this two-center cross-sectional study. The primary outcome was the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-V Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI), a measure of working memory, processing speed, and attention. Secondary outcomes were general intelligence, auditory, visuospatial, and narrative memory, as well as executive functioning and sleep. A total of 105 children, of whom 36 had been treated with propranolol (age 6.0-11.8 years, follow-up time 1.6-9.7 years, 19% male) and 69 had been treated with atenolol (age 6.9-9.7 years, follow-up time 4.5-8.4 years, 19% male), were analyzed. The CPI and other neurocognitive outcomes did not differ between the propranolol and atenolol groups and were in line with general population test norms. Post hoc analyses revealed lower CPI scores for males, both compared to participating females (10.3 IQ points, medium effect size) and compared to matched test norms (12.4 IQ points, medium effect size). Long-term neurocognitive functioning did not differ between children treated with propranolol and those treated with atenolol for IH. Overall, propranolol and atenolol appear to be safe treatments for IH regarding long-term neurocognitive functioning. The substantially lower CPI scores in males warrant further investigation. Netherlands Trial Register, NL7703 https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7703 What is Known: • Infants with infantile hemangioma are effectively treated with propranolol or atenolol. • Parents and professionals are concerned about long-term neurocognitive effects.• No long-term (≥ 6 years) differences in neurocognitive functioning were found between children treated with propranolol or atenolol. • Males treated with beta-blockers had substantially lower IQ scores than treated females and males from the general population, which is a matter of concern and should be considered when evaluating the risk/benefit ratio in less severe forms of infantile hemangioma.

Contains fulltext : 251160.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is currently off-label for use in pediatric clinical care worldwide. Nevertheless, it is frequently prescribed to pediatric patients as premedication prior to induction of anesthesia or for procedural sedation. There is ample literature on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine in this vulnerable patient population, but there is a general lack of consensus on dosing. In this project, we aimed to use the standardized workflow of the Dutch Pediatric Formulary to establish best evidence-based pediatric dosing guidelines for dexmedetomidine as premedication and for procedural sedation. METHOD: The available literature on dexmedetomidine in pediatrics was reviewed in order to address the following three questions: (1) What is the right dose? (2) What is known about efficacy? (3) What is known about safety? Relevant literature was compiled into a risk-benefit analysis document. A team of clinical experts critically appraised the analysis and the proposed dosing recommendations. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine is most commonly administered via the intravenous or intranasal route. Clearance is age dependent, warranting higher doses in infants to reach similar exposure as in adults. Dexmedetomidine use results in satisfactory sedation at parent separation, adequate sedation and a favorable recovery profile. The safety profile is good and comparable to adults, with dose-related hemodynamic effects. CONCLUSION: Following the structured approach of the Dutch Pediatric Formulary, best evidence-based dosing recommendations were proposed for dexmedetomidine, used as premedication prior to induction of anesthesia (intranasal dose) and for procedural sedation (intranasal and intravenous dose) in pediatric patients.

On April 24, 2019, a symposium on Pediatric Pharmacokinetics and Dose Predictions was held as a satellite meeting to the 10th Juvenile Toxicity Symposium. This symposium brought together scientists from academia, industry, and clinical research organizations with the aim to update each other on the current knowledge on pediatric drug development. Through more knowledge on specific ontogeny profiles of drug metabolism and transporter proteins, integrated into physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, we have gained a more integrated understanding of age-related differences in pharmacokinetics (PKs), Relevant examples were presented during the meeting. PBPK may be considered the gold standard for pediatric PK prediction, but still it is important to know that simpler methods, such as allometry, allometry combined with maturation function, functions based on the elimination pathway, or linear models, also perform well, depending on the age range or the mechanisms involved. Knowledge from different methods and information sources should be combined (e.g., microdosing can reveal early read-out of age-related differences in exposure), and such results can be a value to verify models. To further establish best practices for dose setting in pediatrics, more in vitro and in vivo research is needed on aspects such as age-related changes in the exposure-response relationship and the impact of disease on PK. New information coupled with the refining of model-based drug development approaches will allow faster targeting of intended age groups and allow more efficient design of pediatric clinical trials. ispartof: Cts-Clinical And Translational Science vol:14 issue:1 pages:29-35 ispartof: location:United States status: published