Search

Study designExpert consensus study.ObjectiveThis expert panel was created to establish best practice guidelines to identify and treat patients with poor bone health prior to elective spinal reconstruction.Summary of background dataCurrently, no guidelines exist for the management of osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients undergoing spinal reconstructive surgery. Untreated osteoporosis in spine reconstruction surgery is associated with higher complications and worse outcomes.MethodsA multidisciplinary panel with 18 experts was assembled including orthopedic and neurological surgeons, endocrinologists, and rheumatologists. Surveys and discussions regarding the current literature were held according to Delphi method until a final set of guidelines was created with over 70% consensus.ResultsPanelists agreed that bone health should be considered in every patient prior to elective spinal reconstruction. All patients above 65 and those under 65 with particular risk factors (chronic glucocorticoid use, high fracture risk or previous fracture, limited mobility, and eight other key factors) should have a formal bone health evaluation prior to undergoing surgery. DXA scans of the hip are preferable due to their wide availability. Opportunistic CT Hounsfield Units of the vertebrae can be useful in identifying poor bone health. In the absence of contraindications, anabolic agents are considered first line therapy due to their bone building properties as compared with antiresorptive medications. Medications should be administered preoperatively for at least 2 months and postoperatively for minimum 8 months.ConclusionBased on the consensus of a multidisciplinary panel of experts, we propose best practice guidelines for assessment and treatment of poor bone health prior to elective spinal reconstructive surgery. Patients above age 65 and those with particular risk factors under 65 should undergo formal bone health evaluation. We also established guidelines on perioperative optimization, utility of various diagnostic modalities, and the optimal medical management of bone health in this population.Level of Evidence: 5.

Background: An accurate knowledge of a patient's risk of cord-level intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data loss is important for an informed decision-making process prior to deformity correction, but no prediction tool currently exists. Methods: A total of 1,106 patients with spinal deformity and 205 perioperative variables were included. A stepwise machine-learning (ML) approach using random forest (RF) analysis and multivariable logistic regression was performed. Patients were randomly allocated to training (75% of patients) and testing (25% of patients) groups. Feature score weights were derived by rounding up the regression coefficients from the multivariable logistic regression model. Variables in the final scoring calculator were automatically selected through the ML process to optimize predictive performance. Results: Eight features were included in the scoring system: sagittal deformity angular ratio (sDAR) of ≥15 (score = 2), type-3 spinal cord shape (score = 2), conus level below L2 (score = 2), cervical upper instrumented vertebra (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic Cobb angle of ≥75° (score = 2), preoperative lower-extremity motor deficit (score = 2), preoperative upright largest thoracic kyphosis of ≥80° (score = 1), and total deformity angular ratio (tDAR) of ≥25 (score = 1). Higher cumulative scores were associated with increased rates of cord-level IONM data loss: patients with a cumulative score of ≤2 had a cord-level IONM data loss rate of 0.9%, whereas those with a score of ≥7 had a loss rate of 86%. When evaluated in the testing group, the scoring system achieved an accuracy of 93%, a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 94%, and an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.898. Conclusions: This is the first study to provide an ML-derived preoperative scoring system that predicts cord-level IONM data loss during pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery with >90% accuracy. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design. Asymptomatic Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort: cross-sectional, multicenter. Symptomatic cohort: retrospective, multisurgeon, single-center. Objective. To assess the association of odontoid-coronal vertical axis (OD-CVA) and orbital-coronal vertical axis (ORB-CVA) with radiographic parameters, patient-reported outcomes, and clinical outcomes. Summary of Background Data. Previous literature studied the OD-CVA in an asymptomatic cohort and ORB-CVA in a symptomatic cohort, demonstrating their correlations with radiographic parameters and ORB-CVA with outcomes. Materials and Methods. A total of 468 asymptomatic adult participants were prospectively enrolled in the MEANS cohort. 174 symptomatic patients with adult spinal deformity with = 6 fused levels and 2-year follow-ups were retrospectively enrolled in the symptomatic cohort. The association between OD-CVA and ORB-CVA, and radiographic parameters, perioperative variables, PROs, and outcomes were analyzed. Pearson correlation was used to assess correlation and logistic regression odds of outcomes. Results. In the MEANS cohort, the ORB-CVA correlated with C7-CVA (r = 0.58) and OD-CVA (r = 0.74). In the symptomatic cohort, preoperative ORB-CVA correlated better with leg length discrepancy; r = 0.17, P = 0.029), whereas preoperative OD-CVA correlated better with C7-CVA (r = 0.90, P < 0.001). Postoperative ORB-CVA correlated with postoperative C7-CVA (r = 0.66, P < 0.001), and postoperative OD-CVA correlated strongly with postoperative C7-CVA (r = 0.81, P < 0.001). Both preoperative OD-CVA (r = 0.199) and ORB-CVA (r = 0.208) correlated with the preoperative Oswestry Disability Index. ORB-CVA correlated better than OD-CVA in the preoperative Scoliosis Research Society-22r pain category but worse in total and other subcategories. Preoperative ORB-CVA was associated with increased odds of intraoperative complication (odds ratio = 1.28, 1.01-1.22), like OD-CVA (odds ratio = 1.30, 1.12-1.53). Neither preoperative ORB-CVA nor OD-CVA was associated with reoperations and readmissions after multivariate analysis. Preoperative OD-ORB mismatch >1.5 cm was not associated with increased odds of intraoperative and postoperative complications, reoperations, or readmissions. Conclusion. ORB-CVA and OD-CVA correlated with radiographic parameters, patient-reported outcomes, and intraoperative complications. ORB-CVA and OD-CVA can be used interchangeably as cranial coronal parameters in adult spinal deformity surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal deformity surgery often requires complex surgical interventions that can have a drastic effect on both patient quality of life and functional capacity. Modern-day corrective solutions for these deformities include spinal osteotomies, pedicle screw instrumentation, and dual/multirod constructs. These solutions are efficacious and are currently considered standard practice for spinal surgeons, but they lack individualization. Patient-specific rods (PSRs) are a novel technology that attempts to offer a personalized approach to spinal deformity correction based on preoperative computerized tomography scans. Moreover, PSRs may offer several advantages to conventional rods, which include achievement of desired rod contour angles according to surgical planning alignment goals, reduced operative time, and reduced blood loss. In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, those instrumented with PSR have observed coronal Cobb reductions up to 74%. In adult spinal deformity, PSRs have offered superior correction in radiographic parameters such as sagittal vertical axis and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. However, there still remains a paucity of research in this area, mainly in health care expenditure, cost-effectiveness, and longitudinal clinical outcomes. The purpose of this article is to survey the current body of knowledge of PSR instrumentation in both adolescent and adult spinal deformity populations. The current strength, limitations, and future directions of PSRs are highlighted throughout this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design. Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort: prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter. Objective. To analyze the distribution of GAP scores in the MEANS cohort and compare the spinal shape via stratification by GAP alignment category, age, and country. Summary of Background Data. The GAP score has been used to categorize spinal morphology and prognosticate adult spinal deformity surgical outcomes and mechanical complications. We analyzed a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort to assess the distribution of GAP scores. Methods. Four hundred sixty-seven healthy volunteers without spinal disorders were recruited in five countries. Sagittal radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. The GAP total and constituent factor scores were calculated for each patient. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was performed to compare variables across groups, followed by the post hoc Games-Howell test. Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The significance level was set to P<0.05. Results. In the MEANS cohort, 13.7% (64/467) of volunteers were ≥60 years old, and 86.3% (403/467) were <60 years old. 76.9% (359/467) was proportioned, 19.5% (91/467) was moderately disproportioned, and 3.6% (17/467) was severely disproportioned. There was no significant difference in the frequency of proportioned, moderately, or severely disproportioned GAP between subjects from different countries (P=0.060). Those with severely disproportioned GAP alignment were on average 14.5 years older (P= 0.016), had 23.1° lower magnitude lumbar lordosis (LL) (P< 0.001), 14.2° higher pelvic tilt (P< 0.001), 13.3° lower sacral slope (P< 0.001), and 24.1° higher pelvic-incidence (PI)-LL mismatch (P<0.001), 18.2° higher global tilt (P< 0.001) than those with proportioned GAP; thoracic kyphosis and PI were not significantly different (P>0.05). Conclusions. The GAP system applies to a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort. Spinal alignment should be considered on a spectrum, as 19.5% of the asymptomatic volunteers were classified as moderately disproportioned and 3.6% severely disproportioned. Radiographic malalignment does not always indicate symptoms or pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Volitional movement requires descending input from the motor cortex and sensory feedback through the spinal cord. We previously developed a paired brain and spinal electrical stimulation approach in rats that relies on convergence of the descending motor and spinal sensory stimuli in the cervical cord. This approach strengthened sensorimotor circuits and improved volitional movement through associative plasticity. In humans, it is not known whether posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted at the sensorimotor interface or anterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted within the motor system is effective at facilitating brain evoked responses. In 59 individuals undergoing elective cervical spine decompression surgery, the motor cortex was stimulated with scalp electrodes and the spinal cord was stimulated with epidural electrodes, with muscle responses being recorded in arm and leg muscles. Spinal electrodes were placed either posteriorly or anteriorly, and the interval between cortex and spinal cord stimulation was varied. Pairing stimulation between the motor cortex and spinal sensory (posterior) but not spinal motor (anterior) stimulation produced motor evoked potentials that were over five times larger than brain stimulation alone. This strong augmentation occurred only when descending motor and spinal afferent stimuli were timed to converge in the spinal cord. Paired stimulation also increased the selectivity of muscle responses relative to unpaired brain or spinal cord stimulation. Finally, clinical signs suggest that facilitation was observed in both injured and uninjured segments of the spinal cord. The large effect size of this paired stimulation makes it a promising candidate for therapeutic neuromodulation. Key points: Pairs of stimuli designed to alter nervous system function typically target the motor system, or one targets the sensory system and the other targets the motor system for convergence in cortex.In humans undergoing clinically indicated surgery, we tested paired brain and spinal cord stimulation that we developed in rats aiming to target sensorimotor convergence in the cervical cord.Arm and hand muscle responses to paired sensorimotor stimulation were more than five times larger than brain or spinal cord stimulation alone when applied to the posterior but not anterior spinal cord.Arm and hand muscle responses to paired stimulation were more selective for targeted muscles than the brain‐ or spinal‐only conditions, especially at latencies that produced the strongest effects of paired stimulation.Measures of clinical evidence of compression were only weakly related to the paired stimulation effect, suggesting that it could be applied as therapy in people affected by disorders of the central nervous system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Single center, retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Little is known about the surgical outcomes and quality of life in patients with C2-sacrum posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Though it is thought to be a "final" construct, it remains unknown how patients fare postoperatively. We sought to evaluate the surgical outcomes and quality of life of patients after C2-sacrum PSF. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing C2-Sacrum PSF from 2015-2020 by 4 surgeons at a single institution were included. The study time period for each patient began after their index operation that led to the C2-sacrum fusion. Dates of surgery, complications, reoperations, patient reported outcomes (PROs) including EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaires, and activities of daily living (ADL) questions were collected and analyzed. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, student t-tests, and linear regression were used. Results: Of the 23 patients who underwent C2-sacrum PSF, 6 patients (26%) required a total of 10 reoperations after a mean of 1.5 years (range 0-4 years) after C2-sacrum PSF. Five reoperations were for mechanical failure; 3 for wound complications/infection; and 2 for instrumentation and spinous process prominence. PROs were collected on 18 patients with mean follow-up of 2.4 years (range.5-4.5) after their C2-sacrum PSF. At 6-months, both SRS-22 and ODI scores improved significantly after C2-sacrum PSF (SRS: 57.5 to 76.3, P =.0014; ODI: 47.0 to 31.7, P =.013). Similarly, at a mean 2.4 years postoperatively, mean ODI improved significantly (47.0 to 30.4, P =.0032). Six patients (33%) had minimal symptoms (ODI <20). The median postoperative EQ-5D score was.74 (range.19 to 1.0), which compares favorably to patients with hip/knee osteoarthritis (EQ-5D.63) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (EQ-5D.69) and hypertension (HTN). In terms of activities of daily living (ADL), 10 patients (56%) exercised regularly—a mean 4.5 days/week. 11 (61%) could do light aerobic activity (e.g. stationary bike). 10 (55%) were able to play with children/grandchildren as desired. Eight patients (44%) hiked, and 2 (11%) drove independently. 11 (61%) could tolerate short air-travel comfortably. Of the 17 patients who could toilet and perform basic hygiene preoperatively, 16 (94%) were able to do so postoperatively. Conclusion: Though C2-sacrum PSF is thought to be a "final" construct, approximately 1 in 4 patients require subsequent operations. However, C2-sacrum PSF patients had a significant improvement in SRS and ODI scores by 6 months postop. Over 60% of patients were regularly performing light aerobic activity 2 years after their C2-sacrum PSF. EQ-5D suggests that this population fares better than those with degenerative hip/knee arthritis and similarly to those with common chronic conditions like DM and HTN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]