Search

Mature follow up from multiple randomized trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of external beam partial breast irradiation (PBI) for appropriately selected patients with early stage breast cancer. Despite this evidence, external beam PBI remains underutilized. In this user guide we outline patient selection, workflow, and address possible challenges to aid in implementation of evidence-based external beam PBI.Review of the current guidelines for PBI suitability, surgical considerations, treatment technique, simulation, contouring, and treatment planning, citing the latest published literature to support PBI utilization.Prospective data supports the use of 30 Gy in 5 fractions delivered with intensity modulated radiation therapy on a daily or every other day basis for a significant proportion of early stage breast cancer patients. The surgical cavity must be clearly visualized on treatment planning scan, recommend 3-5 weeks post-operatively, and the recommended clinical target volume expansion on the surgical cavity is 0.5-1.0 cm. A planning target volume expansion, based on motion management and image guidance, of 0.5-1.0 cm should be used. Organ at risk dose constraints of heart V3Gy ≤10% and contralateral breast Dmax ≤1 Gy are often achievable.Five fraction external beam PBI is a highly effective treatment with very limited toxicity for patients with early stage breast cancer following breast conserving surgery. Commonly utilized intensity modulated treatment planning techniques with plan delivery on standard linear accelerators results significant normal tissue sparing and makes implementation feasible at most radiation oncology centers.

Introduction We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as salvage treatment for local recurrence after prior surgical resection for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods We surveyed our prospective lung SBRT registry for patients who received salvage SBRT (sSBRT) for local recurrence after previous resection of a primary NSCLC. Following sSBRT, local control, distant metastases, overall survival, and treatment-related toxicity were evaluated. Results From 2004 to 2017, 48 patients met inclusion criteria. At initial surgery, 44 (83%) patients had stage I to II disease, and surgical approaches were 47.9% wedge resection, 4.2% segmentectomy, 43.8% lobectomy, and 4.2% bilobectomy. The median time to local recurrence after surgery was 26.4 months, and 36 (75%) recurrences were biopsy-proven. Surgical salvage was not possible owing to un-resectability or underlying comorbidities in 45 (93.8%) patients. Most (68.8%) patients received 50 Gy in 5 fractions. The median follow-up after sSBRT was 22.6 months (range, 3.8-108.8 months). Eight (16.7%) patients experienced local or lobar failure, and 9 (19.1%) patients had nodal failure at a median of 12.5 months (range, 2-66.1 months). Nineteen (39.6%) patients failed distantly at a median of 11.4 months. The median overall survival after sSBRT was 29.3 months. A total of 72.9% of patients experienced no toxicity after sSBRT. Three (6.3%) patients developed grade III toxicity (cough, atelectasis, or soft tissue necrosis) following sSBRT. Conclusions Similar to SBRT for primary early stage NSCLC, sSBRT for local relapse following surgical resection of NSCLC offers high rates of local control with limited toxicity. Distant failure remains the primary pattern of failure.

e19407 Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a continuous improvement process aimed at reducing time to treatment on minimizing the number of days spent to complete pre-treatment visits and the associated costs for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Methods: System-wide initiatives were implemented in 2015 to minimize time to treatment initiation (TTI), by incorporating lean process strategies and enhanced coordination. Patient and treatment information was obtained through an IRB-approved registry for the years 2015 and 2018. Average number of days spent to complete visits, TTI, and associated patient costs including driving expenses, parking, food, childcare, and lost wages were calculated and compared between the years 2015 and 2018. Results: In 2015, the median TTI was 43.5 days and the average number of separate days spent to attend multidisciplinary visits prior to first treatment was 1.86. These were reduced to 29 days and 1.52 visits, respectively, in 2018 (p < 0.0001 for both). When evaluating treatment visits by surgical procedure, the average number of visits was reduced regardless of surgical procedure. The average number of visits was highest for patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction (2.34 in 2015, reduced to 1.65 in 2018, p < 0.0001). A single visit to complete treatment planning was associated with patient costs of $249 as compared with multiple trips costing $491 for 2 visits and up to $1,226 for 5 visits. Conclusions: In breast cancer patients, implementing a continuous improvement process to reduce time to treatment was associated with fewer visits required prior to treatment initiation, resulting in lower patient costs.

Several randomized trials have been performed comparing partial breast irradiation (PBI) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) though controversy remains, including regarding differences by PBI technique. We performed a meta-analysis to compare results between WBI versus PBI and between PBI techniques. A systematic review was performed to identify modern randomized studies listed in MEDLINE from 2005 to 2020. PBI trials were divided into external beam radiation and brachytherapy techniques, with intraoperative radiation excluded. A Bayesian logistic regression model evaluated the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and acute and chronic toxicities. The primary outcome was IBTR at 5 years with WBI compared with PBI. A total of 9758 patients from 7 studies were included (4840-WBI, 4918-PBI). At 5 years, no statistically significant difference in the rate of IBTR was noted between PBI (1.8%, 95% HPD 0.68–3.2%) and WBI (1.7%, 95% HPD 0.92–2.4%). By PBI technique, the 5-year rate of IBTR rate for external beam was 1.7% and 2.2% for brachytherapy. Rates of grade 2 + acute toxicity were 7.1% with PBI versus 47.5% with WBI. For late toxicities, grade 2/3 rates were 0%/0% with PBI compared with 1.0%/0% with WBI. IBTR rates were similar between PBI and WBI with no significant differences noted by PBI technique; PBI had reduced acute toxicities compared to WBI. Because studies did not provide toxicity data in a consistent fashion, definitive conclusions cannot be made with additional data from randomized trials needed to compare toxicity profiles between PBI techniques.

We sought to evaluate time trends and correlates of the use of a radiation tumor bed boost (TBB) after breast-conserving surgery and either conventional or hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (CWBI or HWBI) for patients with early stage breast cancer.The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2016. We evaluated the utilization of TBB before and after publication of the Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology margin guidelines in relation to sociodemographic variables, treatment facility, tumor characteristics, and whole-breast fractionation.The population included 380,387 patients, of whom 76.7% received a TBB. Utilization of TBB decreased over time (2012-2013: 79.2%; 2014: 76.6%; 2015-2016: 74.7%; P.001); this was seen for most subgroups evaluated. Rates of TBB differed by facility type and region. There was a decrease in TBB use in patients treated with CWBI over time (2012-2013: 84.9%; 2014: 83.5%; 2015-2016: 82.3%; P.001) but an increase among patients treated with HWBI (2012-2013: 55.5%; 2014: 60.7%; 2015-2016: 65.1%; P.001); this was also seen for low-risk patients (age70 years, negative margins). Among patients undergoing HWBI, TBB was more frequently used when 15 fractions were used compared with 16 fractions (76.8% vs 59.1%; P.001).The use of TBB decreased over time, coinciding with the publication of new margin guidelines, for patients receiving CWBI and those with negative margins, but TBB use increased for patients treated with HWBI. Hence, fractionation regimen is a critical variable in analyzing changes over time in the practice patterns of TBB.

Primary liver cancer is the seventh most common cancer worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for three-quarters of primary liver cancers and less than a third of patients present with curable disease. Liver-directed therapy is essential for the treatment of patients with unresectable HCC and the advancement of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has made radiation a safe and effective treatment option in a range of clinical presentations. In this review, we discuss the technical aspects of SBRT and the general approach to treatment of HCC. We explore the use of SBRT for bridging to transplant, downstaging, and the treatment of large tumors and portal vein tumor thrombus. Although there is limited high-quality randomized data, we review the evidence comparing SBRT with other liver-directed therapies and explore areas for future investigation.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a rare disease representing only 3% of the primary gastrointestinal malignancies. CC is classified based on anatomical location (intrahepatic, perihilar, and extrahepatic) and surgery is the preferred definitive treatment, regardless of location. However, a minority of patients is able to undergo complete surgical resection, and thus, nonsurgical locoregional therapy is imperative for tumor control. With the significant evolution of external beam radiation therapy, higher doses can be more precisely delivered, with adequate sparing of surrounding normal tissues, which appear to be associated with improved outcomes. In this review, we discuss the role of radiation therapy for each anatomical subsite of CC including the postoperative setting, neoadjuvant setting prior to liver transplantation, as well as definitive treatment with dose-escalated radiation and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Although there has been substantial improvement in radiation therapy techniques, randomized data are limited given CC remains both a rare and heterogenous disease. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment is essential in order to achieve optimal outcomes, and further investigation into novel therapies remains ongoing.

We sought to evaluate the correlation between MRI phenotypes of prostate cancer as defined by PI-RADS v2 and the Decipher Genomic Classifier (used to estimate the risk of early metastases). This single-center, retrospective study included 72 nonconsecutive men with prostate cancer who underwent MRI before radical prostatectomy performed between April 2014 and August 2017 and whose MRI registered lesions were microdissected from radical prostatectomy specimens and then profiled using Decipher (89 lesions; 23 MRI invisible [PI-RADS v2 scores ≤ 2] and 66 MRI visible [PI-RADS v2 scores ≥ 3]). Linear regression analysis was used to assess clinicopathologic and MRI predictors of Decipher results; correlation coefficients (r) were used to quantify these associations. AUC was used to determine whether PI-RADS v2 could accurately distinguish between low-risk (Decipher score

Breast cancer treatment often requires multi-disciplinary evaluation, which can require multiple visits, delaying time to treatment initiation (TTI). The present analysis evaluated the impact of system-wide initiatives to reduce TTI by evaluating TTI for patients completing treatment evaluation in a single visit compared with those having multiple visits. The results demonstrated that patients who completed multi-disciplinary evaluation in a single visit had a reduced median TTI (27 vs 32 days, P = .002), which was seen for patients undergoing initial surgery (28.0 vs 33.5 days, P = .01) as well as for those undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy (22.5 vs 29 days, P = .05).

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To report outcomes for women with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) without completion axillary dissection, and to investigate the effect of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). MATERIALS/METHODS Data from 5 North American institutions were pooled to include women with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer from 1997-2015 who underwent mastectomy with a positive SLNB and ≤ 5 lymph nodes (LNs) resected. All patients were clinically N0 and none received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Competing-risks regression was performed to identify factors associated with overall recurrence (OR), inclusive of locoregional (LR) and distant recurrence (DM). RESULTS Among 871 patients included, median age at diagnosis was 57 years, 92% were ER/PR-positive, 85% HER2-negative, and 60% received adjuvant chemotherapy. The 500 (57%) patients who received PMRT were significantly younger, had larger tumors, more positive LN, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), extracapsular extension (ECE), HER2-positive disease, and more frequently received adjuvant chemotherapy (all P < 0.05) compared to those not receiving PMRT. Median number of lymph nodes sampled in each group was 3 (range: 1-5). At a median follow up of 5.2 years, the 5-year cumulative incidence rates of LR, DM, OR, and breast cancer mortality (BCM) were 2%, 4%, 5%, and 3%, respectively. The 5-year rates of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 87% and 91%. LR was the only endpoint with a statistically significant difference between those receiving PMRT (0.4%) as compared to those without PMRT (3.9%), P < 0.001. On univariable competing risks regression, tumor size, nodal ratio, grade, LVI, and ER/PR status were significantly associated with OR and were included in multivariable analysis. On multivariable competing risks regression, larger tumor size (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19-1.81, P < 0.001), grade III (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.07-3.05, P = 0.03), higher nodal ratio (HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.01-7.69, P = 0.049), and LVI (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.27-3.28, P = 0.003) were significantly associated with increased risk of OR. PMRT was associated with decreased risk of OR (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.26-1.00, P = 0.05), though this effect did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION In selected patients undergoing mastectomy and SLNB without completion axillary dissection for pT1-2N1 breast cancer, larger tumor size, higher grade, increased nodal ratio and the presence of LVI are associated with increased risk of overall recurrence. Further studies are needed to identify which subset of patients may benefit most from PMRT.

Brain brachytherapy has been used for many years to treat patients with primary brain tumors and brain metastases. Different brachytherapy treatment modalities have been utilized using different radioactive isotopes. Data regarding efficacy and safety of brain brachytherapy for both adult and pediatric glioma patients is encouraging. However, its current use has been declining and is limited to few centers. Brain brachytherapy could be an appealing alternative for patients with gliomas in an eloquent brain location where surgery cannot be safely done, as results have shown comparable outcomes to surgically resected gliomas. It may also have a role as salvage therapy for a selected group of patients with recurrent lesions. Data regarding oligodendroglioma specific patients is limited as this pathology presents its own unique outcomes. Further prospective studies using clinical and survival endpoints, including quality of life measurements are warranted to study brain brachytherapy.