Search

ImportancePatient-submitted images vary considerably in quality and usefulness. Studies that characterize patient-submitted images in a real-life setting are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality and perceived usefulness of patient-submitted images as determined by dermatologists and characterize agreement of their responses.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis survey study included patient images submitted to the Department of Dermatology at Duke University (Durham, North Carolina) between August 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. From a total pool of 1200 images, 10 dermatologists evaluated 200 or 400 images each, with every image being evaluated by 3 dermatologists. Data analysis occurred during the year leading up to the article being written.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were the responses to 2 questions and were analyzed using frequency counts and interrater agreement (Fleiss κ) to assess image quality and perceived usefulness. We performed a random-effects logistic regression model to investigate factors associated with evaluators’ decision-making comfort. We hypothesized that most images would be of low quality and perceived usefulness, and that interrater agreement would be poor.ResultsA total of 259 of 2915 patient-submitted images (8.9%) did not depict a skin condition at all. The final analysis comprised 3600 unique image evaluations. Dermatologist evaluators indicated that 1985 images (55.1%) were useful for medical decision-making and 2239 (62.2%) were of sufficient quality. Interrater agreement for a given image’s diagnostic categorization was fair to substantial (κ range, 0.36-0.64), while agreement on image quality (κ range, 0.35-0.47) and perceived usefulness (κ range, 0.29-0.38) were fair to moderate. Senior faculty had higher odds of feeling comfortable with medical decision-making than junior faculty (odds ratio [OR], 3.68; 95% CI, 2.9-4.66; P P P = .01) compared with inflammatory skin conditions and that were in focus (OR, 5.56; 95% CI, 4.63-6.67; P Conclusions and RelevanceIn this survey study including 10 dermatologists, a slight majority of patient-submitted images were judged to be of adequate quality and perceived usefulness. Fair agreement between dermatologists was found regarding image quality and perceived usefulness, suggesting that store-and-forward teledermatology initiatives should consider a physician’s individual experiences and comfort level. The study results suggest that images are most likely to be useful when they are in focus and reviewed by experienced attending physicians for wound surveillance, but dermatologists may be burdened by irrelevant or unsuitable images.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between thermodilution and indirect Fick cardiac output determination methods has not been well described.OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship between these two cardiac output determination methods in patients evaluated for pulmonary hypertension and to highlight potential clinical implications.METHODS: A retrospective review of charts of all adult patients who underwent a right heart catheterization (RHC) between January 1, 2007 and November 10, 2010, and participated in the pulmonary hypertension program of the pulmonary division at an academic institution was conducted. For validation, the charts of all patients who underwent RHC during the same period within the cardiology division were reviewed.RESULTS: A total of 198 patients underwent 213 RHCs, 79 (40%) of whom had pulmonary arterial hypertension, were included. Forty-three per cent of patients had >20% difference between thermodilution and Fick. The average difference (thermodilution − Fick ±SD) was −0.39±2.03 L/min (n=213; P=0.006). There was no significant difference in bias or variability between thermodilution and Fick among patients with tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity (TRJ) of 3 m/s (−0.41±2.10 L/min versus −0.36±1.93 L/min, respectively; P=0.87). In a multivariable analysis, the thermodilution-Fick difference increased with age (P=0.001).DISCUSSION: The presence of such discrepancy in 36% of patients evaluated for heart failure and/or heart transplant validated the results. In total, 37% of the 1315 procedures (213 performed by pulmonologists and 1102 performed by cardiologists) had a difference of >20% between thermodilution and Fick.CONCLUSION: Significant discrepancy exists between thermodilution and indirect Fick methods. This discrepancy potentially impacts pulmonary arterial hypertension prognostication and diagnosis, and is independent of TRJ.