Search

Recent studies suggest that plerixafor mobilization and apheresis in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) is safe and can allow collection of sufficient CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection for clinical gene therapy applications. However, the quantities of plerixafor-mobilized CD34+ cells vary between different SCD patients for unknown reasons. Twenty-three participants with SCD underwent plerixafor mobilization followed by apheresis, processing, and HSC enrichment under a phase 1 safety and efficacy study conducted at 2 institutions. Linear regression or Spearman's correlation test was used to assess the relationships between various hematologic and clinical parameters with total CD34+ cells/kg collected. Median CD34+ cells/kg after 2 or fewer mobilization and apheresis cycles was 4.0 × 106 (range, 1.5-12.0). Similar to what is observed generally, CD34+ yield correlated negatively with age (P < .001) and positively with baseline (P = .003) and preapheresis blood CD34+ cells/µL (P < .001), and baseline white blood cell (P = .01) and platelet counts (P = .03). Uniquely for SCD, CD34+ cell yields correlated positively with the number of days hydroxyurea was held (for up to 5 weeks, P = .01) and negatively with markers of disease severity, including hospitalization frequency within the preceding year (P = .01) and the number of medications taken for chronic pain (P = .002). Unique SCD-specific technical challenges in apheresis were also associated with reduced CD34+ cell collection efficiency and purification. Here, we describe factors that impact plerixafor mobilization success in patients with SCD, confirming known factors as described in other populations in addition to reporting previously unknown disease specific factors in patients with SCD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03226691.

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy is potentially curative for sickle cell disease (SCD) provided that a sufficient quantity of long-term engrafting CD34+ HSCs can be safely collected and infused. In patients with SCD, peripheral blood (PB) mobilization with granulocyte colony stimulating factor is contraindicated, and steady-state bone marrow (BM) harvesting is associated with suboptimal HSC quality and yield. Hence, agents that promote safe and effective peripheral HSC mobilization in SCD are required. Methods: This phase I multicenter study investigated the safety and efficacy of plerixafor mobilization (240 µg/kg) followed by apheresis, processing, and HSC enrichment in 15 adult subjects with SCD (NCT03226691). Hydroxyurea treatment was stopped at least two weeks prior to mobilization and all participants who were not receiving long-term transfusion therapy received prophylactic red blood cell exchange prior to plerixafor administration to achieve a target sickle Hb (HbS) Findings: Fifteen participants with SCD (HbSS n=13, HbSC n=1, HbSβ+ n=1) who met inclusion criteria were enrolled at St. Jude Research Children's Hospital (n=3) or NIH (n=12) between July 2017 and February 2019. All participants except one successfully met the minimum target CD34+ cells/kg yield with 2 or fewer mobilization and apheresis procedures, with almost half the participants (n=7) achieving ≥5.0x106 CD34+ cells/kg. The total WBC count increased by an average of 3.2-fold over baseline (range 1.7-5.0) to an average peak WBC count of 26.5x103/µL (range 14.1-47.4), with counts returning to baseline within 1-2 days. Median total WBC, CD34+, CD19+, and CD3+ cells/kg in the final apheresis product after one (n=12) or two (n=3) collection procedures were 0.9 x109 WBC/kg (range 0.4-1.7), 4.5x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 0.9-12.0), 3.4x108 CD19+ cells/kg (range 0.5-4.9), and 3.6x108 CD3+ cells/kg (range 1.7-7.3), respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between baseline CD34/µL and total CD34+ cells/kg (rs = 0.7776, 95% CI 0.446-0.9215, p = 0.001). Participants with the lowest pre-apheresis CD34 cell count generally underwent higher blood volume processing (rs = - 0.1443, 95% CI -0.6075 to 0.3921, p = 0.59) in an effort to achieve target yields. However, higher blood volume processing did not translate to higher total CD34+ cells/kg collection yields (rs = - 0.2104, 95% CI -0.6488 to 0.3328, p = 0.43). A median of 97% of positively selected CD34+ cells were CD34high (range 73.6-99.4%) compared to 1.3% CD34low (range 0.09-24.4%) phenotype suggesting enrichment for long-term engrafting HSCs. Seven grade III AEs (two non-pain and five pain related) and one grade IV AE (non-pain - hemolysis) occurred and each resolved with symptomatic treatment. Plerixafor mobilization was overall safe and in most cases generated CD34+ cell yields that were sufficient for both genetic modification and back-up allogeneic transplantation (median cell yield 4.2x106 CD34+ cells/kg). Interpretation: This first multi-institutional phase I study suggests the efficiency and safety of plerixafor mobilization and apheresis collection in 15 adult subjects with SCD. The primary endpoint to obtain a target of 2.0x106 CD34+ cells/kg from the PB was exceeded without SAEs. Importantly, immunophenotyping data suggest that for individuals with SCD, the plerixafor mobilized cell product is more enriched for long-term engrafting HSCs compared to CD34+ cells isolated from BM. Given the risks of general anesthesia and the low quality and yield of CD34+ cells harvested from the BM of individuals with SCD, plerixafor mobilization represents a safe and potentially superior alternative for HSC isolation. Disclosures Hankins: Novartis: Research Funding; ASPHO: Honoraria; NHLBI: Research Funding; LYNKS Foundation: Research Funding; NHLBI: Honoraria; National Committee for Quality Assurance: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy. Sharma:Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Other: Study PI; Doris Duke Foundation: Research Funding. Weiss:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Rubius INC: Consultancy; Esperian: Consultancy; Beam Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cellarity INC: Consultancy.

Various approaches have been developed for ex vivo T cell depletion in allogeneic stem cell transplantation to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Direct comparisons of T cell depletion strategies have not been well studied, however. We evaluated cellular and plasma biomarkers in 2 different graft manipulation strategies, CD3+CD19+ cell depletion (CD3/19D) versus CD34+ selection (CD34S), and their associations with clinical outcomes. Identical conditions, including the myeloablative preparative regimen, HLA-identical sibling donor, GVHD prophylaxis, and graft source, were used in the 2 cohorts. Major clinical outcomes were similar in the 2 groups in terms of overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and cumulative incidence of relapse; however, the cumulative incidence of acute GVHD trended to be higher in the CD3/19D cohort compared with the CD34S cohort. A distinct biomarker profile was noted in the CD3/19D cohort: higher levels of ST2, impaired Helios− FoxP3+Treg reconstitution, and rapid reconstitution of naive, Th2, and Th17 CD4 cells in the early post-transplantation period. In vitro graft replication studies confirmed that CD3/19D disproportionately depleted Tregs and other CD4 subset repertoires in the graft. This study confirms the utility of biomarker monitoring, which can be directly correlated with biological consequences and possible future therapeutic indications.

Various approaches have been developed for ex vivo T cell depletion in allogeneic stem cell transplantation to prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, direct comparisons between T-cell depletion strategies have not been well studied. We evaluated cellular and plasma biomarkers in two different graft manipulation strategies: CD3(+)CD19(+) cell depletion (CD3/19D) versus CD34(+) selection (CD34S) and their association with clinical outcomes. Identical conditions including the myeloablative preparative regimen, HLA-identical sibling donor, GVHD prophylaxis, and graft source were used for each cohort. Major clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups in terms of overall survival, non-relapse mortality, and cumulative incidence of relapse, however, the cumulative incidence of acute GVHD trended to be higher in CD3/19D compared to CD34S. A distinct biomarker profile was noted in the CD3/19D cohort: higher levels of ST2, impaired Helios(−) FoxP3(+)T(regs) reconstitution, and rapid reconstitution of naïve, Th2, and Th17 CD4 cells in the early post-transplant period. In vitro graft replication studies confirmed that CD3/19D disproportionately depleted T(regs) and other CD4 subset repertoires in the graft. This study confirmed the utility of biomarker monitoring which can be directly correlated to biological consequences and possible future therapeutic indications.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) patients often risk complications from viral infection due to loss of protective antiviral immunity. One strategy to overcome this hurdle is to supplement the HCT with multi-virus specific T cells (MVST). In phase I trial (NCT02231853), MVSTs were generated using HLA-matched donor-derived dendritic cells pulsed with viral overlapping peptide libraries (cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus, Adenovirus, and BK polyomavirus) and then co-cultured with donor lymphocytes. These cells were infused into the patient in early post-SCT. Using T cell receptor CDR3 immnuosequencing, we investigated the fate of adoptively transferred donor derived MVST in four donor-patient pairs. Relative clonal frequencies were analyzed in the peripheral blood and bone marrow day 60, 100, 180, and 1 year post transplant. The top 10 most frequent clones in the MVST product did not necessarily survive in the patients, and only minor subsets of MVST clonal sequences survived at day 100 (2.92–7.75%). However, these minor MVST clones quickly expanded in all four patients to constitute over >20% of peripheral blood T cells even 6 months to 1 year later. Two patients analyzed had MVST antiviral clones peak during and after detectable viremia or viriuria, but were asymptomatic. One patient received steroids for treatment of GVHD, which was accompanied by the decline of MVST clones and subsequent CMV reactivation. These results suggest that adoptive transfer of viral-specific T cells can promote reconstitution of the anti-viral T cell repertoire and these cells persist in patients long-term post transplant. Furthermore, the fittest clones are dynamically selected to serve as long term sentinels against viral reactivation.

INTRODUCTION: Haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) incurs a risk of bidirectional immune reactions with either severe acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) or graft rejection. Induction of immune tolerance with post-graft cyclophosphamide dramatically improves the outcomes of haplo-SCT. However the optimal duration and the combination of systemic immunosuppressive agents in haplo-SCT remain controversial. Ultra-low dose interleukin 2 (ULD IL-2) preferentially expands regulatory T cells (Tregs) and natural killer (NK) cells, promoting both GVHD prevention and graft versus leukemia (GVL) effects. These properties suggest that ULD IL-2 could play a useful role in haplo-SCT. Here we report the outcomes of a pilot study to determine the safety and feasibility of ULD IL-2 as GVHD prophylaxis in haploidentical allo-SCT (14-H-0180, Clinical Trials.gov ID: NCT02226861) METHODS: Ten subjects with high risk hematological malignancies received a myeloablative conditioning regimens of fludarabine 120mg/m2 (day -10 to day -8) and total body irradiation (TBI; 600-1200 cGy, day -10 to day -6). Thereafter the subjects received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) products (2x108 CD3+/kg) on day -6, followed by post-DLI cyclophosphamide 120mg/kg on days -3 and -2. CD 34+ selected, peripheral blood stem cell product was infused on day 0. Sirolimus was initiated on day -1 with goal trough level of 5-12ng/mL until day+60. ULD-IL2 (aldesleukin, 100,000 IU/m2) was given subcutaneously daily for 12 weeks starting day +1. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and plasma samples were collected at days 14, 28, 60, 84, 100 post-transplant. Multi-color flow cytometry immunophenotyping assay were performed to characterize the subsets of memory T cells, Tregs, NK cells, and monocytes with various functional markers. Plasma levels of biomarkers (ST2, Reg3α, sTNFR1, ANG1, IL-6) were measured using a multiplex microfluidic channel assay. RESULTS: The median age at transplant was 35 years (range 20-66). Most subjects had a high risk EBMT score (median 4, range 2-7) and HCT co-morbidity index (median 4, range 2-7). All subjects achieved successful engraftment (neutrophil >500/uL; median 13 days, platelet >20k/uL; median 15 days) and rapid full donor myeloid and lymphoid chimerism by day 21. At median follow up of 6 month, the overall survival was 71%. One subject died of hepatic veno-occulusive disease (VOD) on day 32 and one subject died of relapse on day 178. All evaluable subjects tolerated ULD-IL2 without significant toxicities. Four subjects experienced either de-novo or rapid exacerbation of acute GVHD after discontinuation of ULD IL-2, resulting in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD of 61% and grade III-IV aGVHD of 36% (Figure A). ULD IL-2 expanded and maintained Helios+FoxP3+Tregs population (pre-transplant, 4.7%±3.1%; day 30, 36.2%±23.1%; day 84, 17.4%±10.6%) as well as CD56brightNK cells population (pre-transplant, 10.7%±13.7%; day 30, 49.7%±10.8%; day 84, 26.1%±6.8%). However on discontinuation of ULD IL-2 both populations decreased to low levels within one week. The timing of aGVHD correlated with a fall of %Tregs in PBMC and a sharp increase of ST2 level in plasma (Figure B). CONCLUSION: ULD IL-2 can be safely administered as GVHD prophylaxis after haplo-SCT. Rebound GVHD after discontinuation of ULD IL-2 implies that donor-derived Tregs acquired dependency to exogenous ULD IL-2. Our study is proof of principle that ULD IL-2 induces immune tolerance through Tregs expansion in haplo-SCT, inspiring further clinical and basic researches in human IL-2 biology. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction: Little is known about the lethality of acute GVHD (aGVHD) in T -cell depleted (TCD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We examined the incidence of aGVHD and its relative contribution to non relapse mortality (NRM) in a cohort of consecutive TCD HSCT at a single institute. Methods: We report 132 consecutive subjects who had undergone TCD HLA-identical sibling HSCT between 2006 and 2016 for hematologic malignancies. All subjects received conditioning with Fludarabine 125mg/m2, Cytoxan 120 mg/kg and 1200 cGy total body irradiation (TBI) ( Thirty-six subjects were over the age of 55 years, 66 were females and 66 were males. Transplant indications were acute leukemia (92), myelodysplastic / myeloproliferative syndromes (26), lymphoid malignancies (7) and chronic myelogenous or myelomonocytic leukemia (7). Fifty-three percent of subjects were at a high risk of relapse. The median follow-up post HSCT was 4.3 years. Results: The incidence of Grade 1-2 and 3-4 aGVHD were 51.6% and 19%, respectively. Of these, 15% of aGVHD was steroid refractory and was treated with infliximab/basiliximab or with mesenchymal stromal cells. Extensive or limited chronic GvHD was observed in 30% and 24% of subjects. 74% of those at risk developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimate for overall survival (OS), NRM and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) for the entire cohort was 71%, 14.6% and 24% respectively at one year, and 52%, 32.5% and 39% at 5 years. We considered the impact of CMV reactivation, slow donor lymphoid chimerism and steroid refractory aGVHD on NRM. However there was no significant impact from CMV reactivation or slow (> 31 days) achievement of complete donor lymphoid chimerism. Significantly improved outcomes were noted for those transplanted beyond 2012: OS, NRM and CIR being 82%,6.2% and 20% at one year, and 68%, 6.2% and 41% at 3 years. Cox proportionate hazard modeling identified steroid refractory aGVHD (HR 4.0, P=0.007) and transplant prior to 2012 (HR 6.7, P=0.001) as significant factors impacting NRM. Conclusions: T cell addback after ex vivo TCD HSCT was associated with a significant burden of aGVHD. Steroid refractory aGVHD impacted NRM, but slow lymphoid engraftment, disease risk, CMV reactivation and age did not. Significant improvements in NRM in the current era suggest greatly improved salvage of steroid refractory aGVHD. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.