Search

Background Metastasis directed therapy (MDT) for patients with oligometastatic disease is associated with improvements in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to systemic therapy alone. Additionally, within a prostate-cancer-specific cohort, MDT is able to forestall initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men with hormone-sensitive, oligometastatic prostate cancer (HSOPCa) compared to observation. While MDT appears to be safe and effective in HSOPCa, a large percentage of men will eventually have disease recurrence. Patterns of failure in HSOPCa demonstrate patients tend to have recurrence in the bone following MDT, raising the question of sub-clinically-apparent osseous disease. Radium-223 dichloride is a radiopharmaceutical with structural similarity to calcium, allowing it to be taken up by bone where it emits alpha particles, and therefore might have utility in the treatment of micrometastatic osseous disease. Therefore, the primary goal of the phase II RAVENS trial is to evaluate the efficacy of MDT + radium-223 dichloride in prolonging progression free survival in men with HSOPCa. Methods Patients with HSOPCa and 3 or less metastases with at least 1 bone metastasis will be randomized 1:1 to stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR, also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)) alone vs SABR + radium-223 dichloride with a minimization algorithm to balance assignment by institution, primary intervention, prior hormonal therapy, and PSA doubling time. SABR is delivered in one to five fractions and patients in the SABR + radium-223 dichloride arm will receive six infusions of radium-223 dichloride at four-week intervals. The primary end point is progression free survival. The secondary clinical endpoints include toxicity and quality of life assessments, local control at 12 months, locoregional progression, time to distant progression, time to new metastasis, and duration of response. Discussion The RAVENS trial will be the first described phase II, non-blinded, randomized study to compare SABR +/− radium-223 dichloride in patients with HSOPCa and 3 or less metastases with at least one bone metastasis. The primary hypothesis is that SABR + radium-223 dichloride will increase median progression-free survival from 10 months in the SABR arm to 20 months in the SABR + radium-223 dichloride arm. Trial registrations Clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT04037358. Date of Registration: July 30, 2019. Date of First Participant Enrolled: August 9, 2019. Date of Last Approved Amendment: October 16, 2019. Protocol Version: Version 5.

Purpose of Review The purpose of the present study is to review the management of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) with radiation therapy (RT).

To determine if pre-treatment non-target lung FDG-PET uptake predicts for symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) following lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).We reviewed a 258 patient database from our institution to identify 28 patients who experienced symptomatic (grade ⩾ 2) RP after SABR, and compared them to 57 controls who did not develop symptomatic RP. We compared clinical, dosimetric and functional imaging characteristics between the 2 cohorts including pre-treatment non-target lung FDG-PET uptake.Median follow-up time was 26.9 months. Patients who experienced symptomatic RP had significantly higher non-target lung FDG-PET uptake as measured by mean SUV (p 0.0001) than controls. ROC analysis for symptomatic RP revealed area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, with sensitivity 82.1% and specificity 57.9% with cutoff mean non-target lung SUV 0.56. Predictive value increased (AUC of 0.82) when mean non-target lung SUV was combined with mean lung dose (MLD). We developed a 0-2 point model using these 2 variables, 1 point each for SUV 0.56 or MLD 5.88 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2), predictive for symptomatic RP in our cohort with hazard ratio 10.01 for score 2 versus 0 (p 0.001).Patients with elevated pre-SABR non-target lung FDG-PET uptake are at increased risk of symptomatic RP after lung SABR. Our predictive model suggests patients with mean non-target lung SUV 0.56 and MLD 5.88 Gy EQD2 are at highest risk. Our predictive model should be validated in an external cohort before clinical implementation.

Purpose The Clinical Evaluation of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab (CLEOPATRA) study showed a 15.7-month survival benefit with the addition of pertuzumab to docetaxel and trastuzumab (THP) as first-line treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the value of adding pertuzumab. Patient and Methods We developed a decision-analytic Markov model to evaluate the cost effectiveness of docetaxel plus trastuzumab (TH) with or without pertuzumab in US patients with metastatic breast cancer. The model followed patients weekly over their remaining lifetimes. Health states included stable disease, progressing disease, hospice, and death. Transition probabilities were based on the CLEOPATRA study. Costs reflected the 2014 Medicare rates. Health state utilities were the same as those used in other recent cost-effectiveness studies of trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Outcomes included health benefits expressed as discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs in US dollars, and cost effectiveness expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. One- and multiway deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses explored the effects of specific assumptions. Results Modeled median survival was 39.4 months for TH and 56.9 months for THP. The addition of pertuzumab resulted in an additional 1.81 life-years gained, or 0.62 QALYs, at a cost of $472,668 per QALY gained. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that THP is unlikely to be cost effective even under the most favorable assumptions, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicted 0% chance of cost effectiveness at a willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY gained. Conclusion THP in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer is unlikely to be cost effective in the United States.

Purpose The Clinical Evaluation of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab (CLEOPATRA) study showed a 15.7-month survival benefit with the addition of pertuzumab (P) to docetaxel and trastuzumab (TH) as first-line treatment for patients with HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the value of the addition of pertuzumab to docetaxel and trastuzumab. Patient and Methods We developed a decision-analytic Markov model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TH with or without P in U.S. patients with metastatic breast cancer. The model followed patients weekly over their remaining lifetimes. Health states included: stable disease, progressing disease, hospice, and death. Transition probabilities were based on the CLEOPATRA study. Costs reflected the 2014 Medicare rates. Health state utilities were the same as those used in other recent cost-effectiveness studies of trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Outcomes included health benefits expressed as discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs in U.S. dollars, and cost-effectiveness expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. One-way and multi-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses explored the effects of specific assumptions. Results Modeled median survival was 39.4 months (TH) and 56.9 months (THP). The addition of pertuzumab resulted in an additional 1.81 life years gained (0.62 QALYs) at a cost of $472,668 per QALY gained. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that THP is unlikely to be cost-effective even under the most favorable assumptions, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicted 0% chance of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY gained. Conclusion The addition of pertuzumab to docetaxel and trastuzumab in patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer is unlikely to be cost-effective in the United States. Citation Format: Qian Y, Durkee BY, Pollom EL, King M, Dudley SA, Shaffer JB, Chang DT, Gibbs IC, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Horst KC. Cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-01.

We present the case of a 63-year-old woman with limited metastatic colorectal cancer to the lungs and liver treated with FOLFIRI-bevacizumab, followed by consolidative hypofractionated radiotherapy to right paratracheal metastatic lymphadenopathy. We treated the right paratracheal site with 60 Gy in 15 fractions (70 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions). The patient tolerated the treatment well, and six months later started a five-month course of FOLFIRI-bevacizumab for new metastatic disease. She presented to our clinic six months after completing this, complaining of productive cough with scant hemoptysis, and was found to have localized tracheal wall breakdown and diverticulum in the region of prior high-dose radiation therapy, threatening to progress to catastrophic tracheovascular fistula. This was successfully repaired surgically after a lack of response to conservative measures. We urge caution in treating patients with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in the setting of hypofractionated radiotherapy involving the mucosa of tubular organs, even when these treatments are separated by months. Though data is limited as to the impact of sequence, this may be particularly an issue when VEGF inhibitors follow prior radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Oncologists use patients’ life expectancy to guide decisions and may benefit from a tool that accurately predicts prognosis. Existing prognostic models generally use only a few predictor variables. We used an electronic medical record dataset to train a prognostic model for patients with metastatic cancer. METHODS: The model was trained and tested using 12 588 patients treated for metastatic cancer in the Stanford Health Care system from 2008 to 2017. Data sources included provider note text, labs, vital signs, procedures, medication orders, and diagnosis codes. Patients were divided randomly into a training set used to fit the model coefficients and a test set used to evaluate model performance (80%/20% split). A regularized Cox model with 4126 predictor variables was used. A landmarking approach was used due to the multiple observations per patient, with t(0) set to the time of metastatic cancer diagnosis. Performance was also evaluated using 399 palliative radiation courses in test set patients. RESULTS: The C-index for overall survival was 0.786 in the test set (averaged across landmark times). For palliative radiation courses, the C-index was 0.745 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.715 to 0.775) compared with 0.635 (95% CI = 0.601 to 0.669) for a published model using performance status, primary tumor site, and treated site (two-sided P

The prophylactic placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube in the head and neck cancer (HNC) patient is controversial. We sought to identify factors associated with prophylactic PEG placement and actual PEG use. Since 2010, data regarding PEG placement and use were prospectively recorded in a departmental database from January 2010 to December 2012. HNC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were retrospectively evaluated from 2010 to 2012. Variables potentially associated with patient post-radiation dysphagia from previous literature, and our experience was evaluated. We performed multivariate logistic regression on these variables with PEG placement and PEG use, respectively, to compare the difference of association between the two arms. We identified 192 HNC patients treated with IMRT. Prophylactic PEG placement occurred in 121 (63.0 %) patients, with PEG use in 97 (80.2 %) patients. PEG placement was associated with male gender (p

132 Background: Sinoatrial node (SAN) injury following stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) in the chest has not been reported in the literature. We report SAN dysfunction as a potential toxicity of SABR in the chest. Methods: We examined the clinical courses and SABR plans of 47 patients treated for T1 or T2 non-small cell lung cancer of the right upper lobe, middle lobe, lower lobe, or hilum. After developing a contouring atlas for the SAN, based upon the junction between the superior vena cava and the right atrium, dose to the SAN was retrospectively determined for each patient. We identified 13 patients whose treatment imparted significant dose to the SAN, as defined by the SAN encompassed within the 10% prescription isodose (IDL) line. Biologically effective doses (BED), acute and chronic, were correlated with SAN toxicity. Results: Patients underwent SABR to the right lung to a dose of 40-50 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions, with mean acute BED (alpha/beta ratio = 10) of 100.2 Gy and late BED (alpha/beta ratio = 3) of 222.7 Gy. Mean volume of the GTV and PTV were 26.1 and 75.1 mL, respectively. Mean follow-up was 25.5 months. The mean volume of the SAN was 0.37 mL. Average max dose and mean dose to the SAN were 24.7 and 70.7 Gy, respectively. Of the 13 patients whose treatment imparted significant dose to the SAN, one patient without prior arrhythmia developed symptomatic SAN dysfunction requiring pacemaker placement at 6 months after completion of treatment. The sinoatrial node of the patient received a maximum dose of 44.8 Gy in 4 fractions, correlated with an acute BED (alpha/beta ratio = 10) of 90 Gy and late BED (alpha/beta ratio = 3) of 194.1 Gy, and a mean dose of 35.5 Gy in 4 fractions, correlated with an acute BED (alpha/beta ratio = 10) of 71 Gy and late BED (alpha/beta ratio = 3) of 153.8 Gy. This was the third highest max dose and second highest mean dose to SAN in the cohort. Conclusions: We report sinoatrial node dysfunction as a potential toxicity of SABR in the chest for non-small cell lung cancer. Caution is advised when treatment imparts significant dose to the sinoatrial node.

e18082Background: Studies have shown that socioeconomic (SE) disparities contribute to differences in cancer survival, with patients in lower SE classes consistently having poorer survival compared...

201 Background: Various schedules of palliative radiotherapy (pRT) are prescribed for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Length of treatment can vary from a single day to three weeks. Single fraction pRT provides similar pain relief vs. multi-fraction pRT for bone metastases, but retreatment rates are higher. In the era of targeted and hormonal therapy, patients with MBC can survive many years after their initial diagnosis. We investigated whether patients with MBC who were prescribed single fraction pRT had poorer prognoses and experienced shorter survival than patients who were prescribed multi-fraction pRT. Methods: Patients at a single institution with MBC underwent pRT, with fractionation schedules including 8 Gy in 1 fraction (fx), 20 Gy in 5 fx, 30 Gy in 10 fx, 37.5 Gy in 15 fx between 2001-2015. 392 treatments were prescribed (109/241/29/13 in each regimen as above). Date of death was obtained from medical records, Social Security Death Index, or published obituaries. Patients who were alive or whose date of death could not be determined were censored at the date of their last encounter. Survival was calculated from the start of treatment to the date of death or censorship. Results: Patients treated with 37.5 Gy in 15 fx (MS 20 months, p = 0.002) or 30 Gy in 10 fx (MS 22 months, p = 0.03) experienced longer survival than patients treated with 8 Gy in 1 fx (MS 8 months). There was no significant survival difference between patients treated with 20 Gy in 5 fx (MS 18 months, p = 0.49) and patients treated with 8 Gy in 1 fx. There was no significant survival difference between patients treated by the three multi-fractionation schedules. Conclusions: MBC patients who were prescribed 37.5 Gy and 30 Gy lived longer than patients who were prescribed 8 Gy of pRT. No statistically significant difference was found between patients who were prescribed 20 Gy compared to 8 Gy, possibly due to the lower number of patients who received these regimens. Single fraction pRT was more likely to be prescribed to patients who would ultimately have shorter survival. More research is needed, ideally across multiple institutions, to explore the correlation between physician estimation of patient survival and selection of pRT regimen for patients with MBC.

200 Background: Choice of fractionation scheme for palliative radiotherapy has received greater attention in recent years, particularly in the current healthcare environment where issues of cost and quality of life have taken on increasing importance. The ASTRO Choosing Wisely campaign recommends against routine use of extended fractionation schemes ( > 10 fractions) for palliation of bone metastases given equivalent pain relief between 30 Gy in 10 fractions and 8 Gy in 1 fraction, and strong consideration for use of 8 Gy in 1 fraction is urged for patients with a limited prognosis or transportation difficulties. We investigated whether there was a difference in survival between patients treated with an intermediate fractionation scheme (5 fractions) and patients who received single-fraction treatment. Methods: We identified 220 patients who received a total of 264 courses of palliative radiotherapy with either 8 Gy in 1 fraction (n = 91) or 20 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 173). Date of death was obtained from either the patient’s medical record, the Social Security Death Index, or publicly available obituaries. If none of these yielded a date of death, patients were censored at the date of their last clinical encounter. The majority of patients (n = 192) were treated for bone metastases. All primary sites were included, with the three most common histologies being lung, breast and prostate (n = 80, 31 and 16, respectively). Results: Overall, we found no significant survival difference between the two groups. Patients treated with 8 Gy in 1 fraction had a median survival of 146 days, whereas patients treated with 20 Gy in 5 fractions had a median survival of 183 days (p = 0.43). Conclusions: Given no difference in survival between fractionation schemes of 20 Gy in 5 fractions and 8 Gy in 1 fraction, delivery of palliative radiation in a single fraction should be strongly considered. Previous studies have identified a higher re-treatment rate in single-fraction treatments, although closer analysis of this data revealed no difference in absolute pain scores prior to re-treatment. Thus, re-treatment for single-fraction radiotherapy may be due instead to a greater clinical willingness to re-treat as opposed to a greater clinical need.