Search

Your search keyword '"Santos-Lasaosa, S."' showing total 381 results
Start Over Author "Santos-Lasaosa, S."
381 results on '"Santos-Lasaosa, S."'

4. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de los trastornos de la presión intracraneal: Documento de consenso del Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de Neurología

Author

García-Ull, J., González-García, N., Torres-Ferrús, M., García-Azorín, D., Molina-Martínez, I.F.J., Beltrán-Blasco, I., Santos-Lasaosa, S., Latorre, G., Gago-Veiga, A.B., Láinez, J.M., Porta-Etessam, J., Nieves-Castellanos, C., Mínguez-Olaondo, A., López-Bravo, A., Quintas, S., Morollón, N., Díaz-Insa, S., Belvís, R., and Irimia, P.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Aplicación de la telemedicina en la asistencia a pacientes con cefaleas: situación actual y recomendaciones del Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de Neurología

Author

Belvís, R., Santos-Lasaosa, S., Irimia, P., López Blanco, R., Torres-Ferrús, M., Morollón, N., López-Bravo, A., García-Azorín, D., Mínguez-Olaondo, A., Guerrero, Á., Porta, J., Giné-Ciprés, E., Sierra, Á., Latorre, G., González-Oria, C., Pascual, J., and Ezpeleta, D.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Adaptation and Validation of the Spanish Version of Decisional Conflict Scale in People with Migraine in Spain

Author

Guerrero-Peral AL, Porta-Etessam J, Rodríguez-Vico J, Núñez M, Ciudad A, Díaz-Cerezo S, Garí-Peris C, Pérez-Sádaba FJ, Lizán L, and Santos-Lasaosa S

Subjects
migraine, decision-making, decisional conflict scale, psychometric properties, adaptation, spanish, Medicine (General), R5-920
Abstract

Ángel Luis Guerrero-Peral,1 Jesús Porta-Etessam,2 Jaime Rodríguez-Vico,3 Mercedes Núñez,4 Antonio Ciudad,4 Silvia Díaz-Cerezo,4 Carla Garí-Peris,5 Francisco Javier Pérez-Sádaba,5 Luis Lizán,5 Sonia Santos-Lasaosa6 1Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain; 2Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; 3Neurology Department, Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain; 4Medical Department, Eli Lilly, Madrid, Spain; 5Outcomes’ 10, Castellón, Spain; 6Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, SpainCorrespondence: Mercedes Núñez, Eli Lilly, Av. de la Industria, 30, Alcobendas, Madrid, 28108, Spain, Tel +34 647447827, Email nunez_mercedes@lilly.comPurpose: We aimed to validate the Spanish version of the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) and analyze its psychometric properties in people with migraine.Patients and Methods: The DCS validation comprised two phases. First, a translation and cross-cultural adaptation following the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Good Practices: 1-preparation, 2-independent forward translation, 3-reconciliation, 4-back-translation, 5-harmonization, 6-clinical review, and 7-content validation in a group of migraine patients. Second, the analysis of the psychometric properties. The reliability or internal consistency of the DCS scale and subscales was assessed using Cronbach’s α value. The item-subscale correlation was also evaluated. A floor and ceiling effects for DCS score was considered when at least 15% of respondents obtained DCS > 90 (ceiling) or < 10 (floor). The construct validity was studied through the correlation between the DCS subscales and by the correlation between the DCS and other questionnaires (Decision Self-Efficacy Scale [DSES] and 9-item Shared Decision-Making [SDM-Q-9]). Spearman’s coefficients were estimated for the correlations.Results: The cross-cultural adaptation was conducted on 17 patients who completed the questionnaire in a mean of 2.4 ± 1.1 minutes. Generally, more than 75% of them considered that DCS items were adequate, easy to understand, and relevant. The psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of n=128 patients. Accordingly, the internal consistency of DCS was high, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.97 for the scale and between 0.87 to 0.96 for subscales. Also, a slight floor effect was observed, with 24.2% of patients having DCS scores < 10. The correlation between subscales exceeded Spearman’s coefficient of 0.7. Whereas the correlation between the DCS and the other questionnaires was generally moderate (Spearman’s coefficient > 0.4).Conclusion: The Spanish version (Spain) of the DCS has very acceptable psychometric properties (reliability and construct validity) and good potential for assessing decisional conflicts among migraine patients.Keywords: migraine, decision-making, decisional conflict scale, psychometric properties, adaptation, Spanish

Published
2022

45. Sensory function in cluster headache: an observational study comparing the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides

Author

Malo-Urriés M, Hidalgo-García C, Estébanez-de-Miguel E, Tricás-Moreno JM, Santos-Lasaosa S, and Jahanshahi M

Subjects
Cluster headache, Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia, Quantitative sensory testing, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, RC321-571, Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system, RC346-429
Abstract

Miguel Malo-Urriés,1 César Hidalgo-García,1 Elena Estébanez-de-Miguel,1 José Miguel Tricás-Moreno,1 Sonia Santos-Lasaosa,2 Marjan Jahanshahi3 1Physiotherapy Research Unit, Department of Physiatry and Nursing, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; 2Neurology Service, University Clinical Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain; 3Cognitive Motor Neuroscience Group, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK Background: Based on inconsistent sensory alterations demonstrated in cluster headache (CH), the aim of this study was to determine whether patients with CH develop sensory changes in the symptomatic side compared to the asymptomatic side.Methods: Quantitative sensory testing (QST), including pressure pain threshold (PPT), tactile detection threshold (TDT), prick detection threshold (PDT), and two-point detection threshold (2PDT), was evaluated in 16 patients (seven women; age 41.9±6.8 years) with CH. Test sites included the first, second, and third divisions of the trigeminal nerve, cervical spine, and thenar eminence in the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides.Results: The symptomatic side, compared to the asymptomatic side, presented significantly decreased PPT in the first (P=0.011; 423.81±174.05 kPa vs 480.13±214.99 kPa) and second (P=0.023; 288.88±140.80 kPa vs 326.38±137.33 kPa) divisions of the trigeminal nerve, significantly increased TDT in the first (P=0.002; 2.44±0.40 vs 1.74±0.24) and second (P=0.016; 1.92±0.34 vs 1.67±0.09) divisions, and increased 2PDT in the first division (P=0.004; 18.13±4.70 mm vs 15.0±4.92 mm) and neck (P=0.007; 45.31±20.65 mm vs 38.44±16.10 mm).Conclusion: These results support the prior evidence suggesting a specific pattern of alteration of sensory function with alterations in the symptomatic side compared to the asymptomatic side. Keywords: cluster headache, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia, quantitative sensory testing

Published
2018

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results