Search

The atmospheric boundary layer mediates the exchange of energy, matter, and momentum between the land surface and the free troposphere, integrating a range of physical, chemical, and biological processes and is defined as the lowest layer of the atmosphere (ranging from a few meters to 3 km). In this review, we investigate how continuous, automated observations of the atmospheric boundary layer can enhance the scientific value of co-located eddy covariance measurements of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon, water, and energy, as are being made at FLUXNET sites worldwide. We highlight four key opportunities to integrate tower-based flux measurements with continuous, long-term atmospheric boundary layer measurements: (1) to interpret surface flux and atmospheric boundary layer exchange dynamics and feedbacks at flux tower sites, (2) to support flux footprint modelling, the interpretation of surface fluxes in heterogeneous and mountainous terrain, and quality control of eddy covariance flux measurements, (3) to support regional-scale modeling and upscaling of surface fluxes to continental scales, and (4) to quantify land-atmosphere coupling and validate its representation in Earth system models. Adding a suite of atmospheric boundary layer measurements to eddy covariance flux tower sites, and supporting the sharing of these data to tower networks, would allow the Earth science community to address new emerging research questions, better interpret ongoing flux tower measurements, and would present novel opportunities for collaborations between FLUXNET scientists and atmospheric and remote sensing scientists.

Several independent measurements of warm-season soil moisture and surface atmospheric variables recorded at the ARM Southern Great Plains (SGP) research facility are used to estimate the terrestrial component of land-atmosphere coupling (LAC) strength and its regional uncertainty. The observations reveal substantial variation in coupling strength, as estimated from three soil moisture measurements at a single site, as well as across six other sites having varied soil and land cover types. The observational estimates then serve as references for evaluating SGP terrestrial coupling strength in the Community Atmospheric Model coupled to the Community Land Model. These coupled model components are operated in both a free-running mode and in a controlled configuration, where the atmospheric and land states are reinitialized daily, so that they do not drift very far from observations. Although the controlled simulation deviates less from the observed surface climate than its free-running counterpart, the terrestrial LAC in both configurations is much stronger and displays less spatial variability than the SGP observational estimates. Preliminary investigation of vegetation leaf area index (LAI) substituted for soil moisture suggests that the overly strong coupling between model soil moisture and surface atmospheric variables is associated with too much evaporation from bare ground and too little from the vegetation cover. These results imply that model surface characteristics such as LAI, as well as the physical parameterizations involved in the coupling of the land and atmospheric components, are likely to be important sources of the problematical LAC behaviors.

In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the significance of Land-Atmosphere (L-A) interactions and feedback mechanisms and their importance for weather and climate prediction. Soil moisture plays a critical role in mediating L-A interactions; therefore, this research assesses the impact of different soil moisture datasets on the classification and distribution of L-A coupling regimes. Using SMAP Level 3 (SMAPL3) and SMAP Level 4 (SMAPL4) soil moisture data, we examine the persistence of dry and wet coupling regimes over two decades (2003–2022), exploring how soil moisture influences coupling classification. An inherent challenge in assessing the significance of soil moisture in L-A coupling classification lies in the need for consistent and unbiased observations of the atmospheric state, represented through metrics such as Convective Triggering Potential (CTP), offering insights into atmospheric stability and Humidity Index (HI), which quantifies moisture within the atmosphere. The study utilizes a Triple Collocation-based merging process to address this issue and combines three reanalysis datasets for CTP and HI. Despite significant correlated errors within the individual reanalysis datasets, the merged product demonstrates enhanced performance, showcasing increased accuracy in capturing atmospheric conditions. When combined with the merged CTP and HI for coupling classification, a higher lag-correlation between soil moisture and the CTP-HI metrics contribute to the persist coupling behaviour, potentially suggesting that temporal consistency is a leading factor. SMAPL4 demonstrates stronger persistence of the wet and dry coupling regimes as compared to SMAPL3. The stronger persistence is partially due to the higher observation count, though it may partially be linked to the unique characteristics of the SMAPL4's assimilation process. This suggests that SMAPL4's approach may offer a robust approximation when assessing land-atmosphere interactions, highlighting the inherent differences between SMAPL3 and SMAPL4 datasets. These findings lay the groundwork for understanding the sensitivity of drought evolution to soil moisture variations by gaining insight into the quantification of coupling strength, thereby providing critical insights for future drought modelling and prediction efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

​​​​​​​Land–atmosphere coupling (LAC) has long been studied, focusing on land surface and atmospheric boundary layer processes. However, the influence of humidity in the lower troposphere (LT), especially that above the planetary boundary layer (PBL), on LAC remains largely unexplored. In this study, we use radiosonde observations from the US Southern Great Plains (SGP) site and an entrained parcel buoyancy model to investigate the impact of LT humidity on LAC there during the warm season (May–September). We quantify the effect of LT humidity on convective buoyancy by measuring the difference between the 2–4 km vertically integrated buoyancy with the influence of background LT humidity and that without it. Our results show that, under dry soil conditions, anomalously high LT humidity is necessary to produce the buoyancy profiles required for afternoon precipitation events (APEs). These APEs under dry soil moisture cannot be explained by commonly used local LAC indices such as the convective triggering potential and low-level humidity index (CTP / HI Low), which do not account for the influence of the LT humidity. On the other hand, consideration of LT humidity is unnecessary to explain APEs under wet soil moisture conditions, suggesting that the boundary layer moisture alone could be sufficient to generate the required buoyancy profiles. These findings highlight the need to consider the impact of LT humidity, which is often decoupled from the humidity near the surface and is largely controlled by moisture transport, in understanding land–atmospheric feedbacks under dry soil conditions, especially during droughts or dry spells over the SGP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Land-atmosphere coupling (LAC) has long been studied focusing on land surface and atmospheric boundary layer processes. However, the influence of lower tropospheric (LT) humidity on LAC remains largely unexplored. In this study, we use radiosonde observations from the U.S. Southern Great Plains (SGP) site and an entrained parcel buoyancy model to investigate the impact of LT humidity on LAC there during the warm season (May–September). We quantify the effect of LT humidity on convective buoyancy by measuring the difference between the 2–4 km vertically integrated buoyancy with and without the influence of background LT humidity. Our results show that, under dry soil conditions, anomalously high LT humidity is necessary to produce the buoyancy profiles required for afternoon precipitation events (APEs). These APEs under dry soil moisture cannot be explained by commonly used local land-atmosphere coupling indices such as the convective triggering potential/low-level humidity index (CTP/HILow), which do not account for the influence of the LT humidity. On the other hand, consideration of LT humidity is unnecessary to explain APEs under wet soil moisture conditions, suggesting the boundary layer moisture alone could be sufficient to generate the required buoyancy profiles. These findings highlight the need to consider the impact of LT humidity, which is often decoupled from the humidity near the surface and largely controlled by moisture transport, in understanding land-atmospheric feedbacks over dry soil conditions, especially during droughts or dry spells over the SGP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Land-atmosphere coupling (LAC) has long been studied focusing on land surface and atmospheric boundary layer processes. However, the influence of lower tropospheric (LT) humidity on LAC remains largely unexplored. In this study, we use radiosonde observations from the U.S. Southern Great Plains (SGP) site and an entrained parcel buoyancy model to investigate the impact of LT humidity on LAC there during the warm season (May–September). We quantify the effect of LT humidity on convective buoyancy by measuring the difference between the 2–4 km vertically integrated buoyancy with and without the influence of background LT humidity. Our results show that, under dry soil conditions, anomalously high LT humidity is necessary to produce the buoyancy profiles required for afternoon precipitation events (APEs). These APEs under dry soil moisture cannot be explained by commonly used local land-atmosphere coupling indices such as the convective triggering potential/low-level humidity index (CTP/HILow), which do not account for the influence of the LT humidity. On the other hand, consideration of LT humidity is unnecessary to explain APEs under wet soil moisture conditions, suggesting the boundary layer moisture alone could be sufficient to generate the required buoyancy profiles. These findings highlight the need to consider the impact of LT humidity, which is often decoupled from the humidity near the surface and largely controlled by moisture transport, in understanding land-atmospheric feedbacks over dry soil conditions, especially during droughts or dry spells over the SGP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]