Search

Introduction Diary-derived symptom score and rescue medication use endpoints, such as symptom-free days (SFDs) and rescue medication-free days (RFD), are frequently used as clinical trial endpoints. Estimates of meaningful change for SFDs and RFDs have not been generated in pediatric populations. This research aimed to generate evidence supporting estimates of the individual within-patient changes that constitute an important or meaningful change in SFDs, RFDs, and updated estimates on the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) in pediatric asthma populations aged 5-11 years. Methods Semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted with children (ages 8-11 years) who had asthma and parents/caregivers of children (4-11 years) with asthma. Before the interview (4-9 days) participants were asked to complete a morning and evening diary. Results On average, parent/caregiver estimates of the difference in SFDs between a “very bad” and a “little bad” week for their children’s asthma were largely concordant with the values reported by their children (differences of 1.8 and 1.4 SFDs, respectively). Both parents/caregivers and children were able to articulate what a meaningful level of change would be on the C-ACT at the item level. This qualitative study generated C-ACT item-level meaningful change estimates in the region of 1-3 category change, which potentially suggests that, if scaled up to represent C-ACT total score, this would lead to change estimates of 7-15 points. Conclusions Our findings suggest that both children with asthma and parents/caregivers can quantitatively estimate and to some extent qualitatively articulate meaningful change in SFDs and RFDs.

Purpose Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening disease that typically causes shortness of breath and exercise intolerance. Combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil has proven to be more effective at preventing clinical failure events in patients with PAH than either drug alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of an ambrisentan/tadalafil fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with co-administration of the 2 monotherapies. Methods This 3-part, randomized, single-dose, open-label crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers. The first part of the study consisted of a 5-way crossover that compared the relative bioavailability of 4 FDC formulations (10-mg ambrisentan + 40-mg tadalafil) with co-administered reference monotherapies. One formulation was selected and its relative bioavailability was assessed when produced in 3 different granulation sizes during the second part of the study. In the third part of the study, the bioequivalence of the candidate FDC with the reference monotherapies was evaluated for the 10-mg/40-mg dose strength, in addition to 2 other dose strengths (5 mg/20 mg and 5 mg/40 mg). For all parts of the study, blood samples were taken at regular intervals after each dose, ambrisentan and tadalafil concentrations determined, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (Cmax, AUC0–∞, and AUC0–t) obtained. Test/reference ratios of the geometric means of PK parameters were used to evaluate bioequivalence. Safety and tolerability were assessed by recording adverse events and monitoring vital signs, ECGs, and clinical laboratory data. Findings Of the 174 subjects screened for eligibility, 112 were allocated to a randomized treatment sequence across all study parts, and 100 completed their full assigned treatments. All 4 FDC formulations tested during part 1 of the study yielded PK parameters similar those of the reference treatments. In part 2, granulation size was found to not affect the relative bioavailability of the selected formulation. In part 3, the selected FDC was found to be bioequivalent to co-administration of the monotherapies in both the fasted and fed states. The FDC was also found to be bioequivalent to the reference treatments at the 2 additional dose strengths. All but one of the adverse events was mild to moderate in intensity, and no serious adverse events were reported. Implications An ambrisentan/tadalafil FDC was bioequivalent to concurrently administered monotherapies and therefore represents a viable alternative treatment to co-administration. Use of an FDC is likely to be associated with reduced costs and improved patient compliance. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02688387 .

Background To evaluate the effects of fluticasone furoate on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical axis, and the safety and tolerability of fluticasone furoate treatment in children with asthma. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, stratified, parallel-group, non-inferiority study of fluticasone furoate 50 µg inhalation powder administered once daily. The study enrolled children (aged 5–11 years inclusive) with a documented diagnosis of asthma for ≥ 6 months and a Childhood Asthma Control Test score of > 19. After a 7–14-day run-in period, eligible subjects were stratified by age and randomized to fluticasone furoate 50 µg once daily or placebo once daily via ELLIPTA for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline (expressed as a ratio) in 0–24-h weighted mean serum cortisol at the end of the treatment period. Results Fifty-six randomized subjects received fluticasone furoate 50 µg once daily and 55 received placebo. The primary analysis was performed in the serum cortisol population (n = 104) and demonstrated that fluticasone furoate 50 µg once daily was non-inferior to placebo (ratio = 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.8096, 1.0620), as the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the geometric mean treatment ratio of fluticasone furoate 50 µg once daily versus placebo was greater than 0.80. Findings from the intent-to-treat population (n = 111) were similar. Conclusions Six weeks of treatment with inhaled fluticasone furoate 50 µg once daily had no clinically relevant effect on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical axis function of children, as measured by 24-h serum cortisol profiles. The primary analysis showed that fluticasone furoate 50 µg once daily was non-inferior to placebo. Fluticasone furoate 50 µg once daily was well tolerated and no new safety concerns emerged during the study. Trial registration This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02483975). Date of submission: 25 June 2015.

This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily umeclidinium 62.5 µg with once-daily glycopyrronium 50 µg in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.This was a 12-week, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02236611). Patients were randomised 1:1 to umeclidinium 62.5 µg or glycopyrronium 50 µg administered via Ellipta or Breezhaler dry powder inhaler, respectively. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at day 85 in the per-protocol population. Other endpoints included: weighted mean FEV1 over 0–24 h and patient-reported outcomes (transition dyspnoea index score and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score). Adverse events were also assessed.A total of 1037 patients were randomised to treatment. Umeclidinium was non-inferior (margin: −50 mL) to glycopyrronium (trough FEV1 at day 85 treatment difference: 24 mL, 95% confidence intervals: −5–54). Improvements in other endpoints were similar between treatments. Adverse event incidences were similar for umeclidinium (37%) and glycopyrronium (36%).Once-daily umeclidinium was non-inferior to once-daily glycopyrronium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in trough FEV1 at day 85. Patient-reported outcomes and safety profiles were similar for both treatments.

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ) is a lipid kinase involved in leukocyte recruitment and activation. Activation of PI3Kδ has been linked to airway inflammation and asthma pathogenesis. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study investigated the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a PI3Kδ inhibitor, nemiralisib (GSK2269557), in patients with persistent, uncontrolled asthma. Patients (n = 50) received once-daily inhaled nemiralisib (1000 µg) or placebo for 28 days, with a crossover to the alternative treatment following a 4-week washout period. Spirometry demonstrated no discernible difference in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline (adjusted posterior median 7 ml; 95% credible interval -83, 102 ml) between nemiralisib and placebo treatment at day 28 (primary endpoint). These results were supported by most secondary endpoints, including weighted mean FEV1 (0-4 hours) and change in trough forced vital capacity at day 28. Nemiralisib was generally well-tolerated, with few side effects except for post-inhalation cough (nemiralisib: 35%; placebo: 9%). At day 14, sputum interleukin (IL)-5, IL-13, IL-6, and IL-8 levels were reduced by a median of 17%, 7%, 15%, and 8%, respectively, when comparing nemiralisib with placebo [n = 15 (IL-5, IL-8) or 16 (IL-6, IL-13); posterior probability of a true ratio >0%: 78%, 64%, 76%, and 63%, respectively]. These results suggest that nemiralisib inhibited PI3Kδ locally; however, this did not translate into meaningful clinical improvement. Further studies will investigate the potential efficacy of nemiralisib in patients with asthma with other specific more severe phenotypes, including those who are colonized with bacteria and frequently exacerbate.

A dry powder inhaler formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) is being evaluated for use in children. An important potential risk associated with the use of inhaled corticosteroids in children is growth suppression. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the short-term lower leg growth in children with asthma treated for 2 weeks with inhaled FF versus placebo from the ELLIPTA inhaler.Prepubertal children with persistent asthma (n = 60; aged 5 to12 years) were recruited into a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover, noninferiority study. The study consisted of four 2-week periods: run-in, 2 treatment periods, 1 washout period, and a 1-week follow-up period. Interventions were FF 50 µg and placebo once daily in the evening. Lower leg length was measured by using knemometry.The randomized ITT population comprised 36 boys and 24 girls with a mean age of 8.7 (standard deviation, 1.5; range, 5-11) years; 58% had a duration of asthma ≥5 years. Fifty-eight subjects completed both treatment periods. The least squares mean growth rate was 0.31 mm/week during treatment with FF and 0.36 mm/week during the placebo period. The difference in adjusted least squares mean growth rates between FF and placebo was -0.052 mm/week with a 95% CI of -0.122 to 0.018. This finding was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.20 mm/week. The overall incidence of adverse events was 35% with placebo and 22% with FF.Inhaled FF 50 µg provided once daily for 2 weeks was noninferior to placebo in terms of effects on short-term lower leg growth in children with asthma. To further quantify the risk of growth suppression in children, intermediate-term growth studies should be conducted. Inhaled FF 50 µg was well tolerated in this study population. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02502734.

Indacaterol is an inhaled, ultra-long-acting β2-agonist that provides 24-h bronchodilation with once-daily dosing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of multiple daily inhaled doses of indacaterol 150 or 300 μg once daily in healthy Chinese volunteers. This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, multiple-dose, parallel-group study, placebo-controlled trial including two doses of indacaterol: 150 and 300 μg. Serum indacaterol was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with a lower limit of quantification of 0.01 ng/mL. The pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental analysis and included C max, T max, and AUC0-24h on Day 1 and AUC0-24h,ss, C max,ss, C min,ss, C av,ss, T max,ss, T 1/2, T 1/2,acc, CL/F, V z/F, and R acc on Day 14 (after repeated once-daily doses). Safety analyses were recorded using physical examination, biochemical tests, and ECG. Indacaterol steady state was achieved after 12-14 days of daily dosing. The mean effective half-life of indacaterol (based on drug accumulation at steady state) was 33.9 and 35.8 h for 150 and 300 μg, respectively. Systemic exposure to indacaterol increased 1.27 and 1.34-fold between the 150- and 300-μg doses on Day 1 (first dose) and Day 14 (repeated dose), respectively. Indacaterol 150 and 300 μg were safe and well tolerated in these volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of multiple inhaled doses of indacaterol 150 and 300 μg (for 14 days) were consistent with moderate systemic accumulation at steady state after repeated once-daily inhalation in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Background The long-acting muscarinic antagonists umeclidinium (UMEC) and tiotropium (TIO) are approved once-daily maintenance therapies for COPD. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of UMEC versus TIO in COPD. Methods This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to UMEC 62.5 μg plus placebo or TIO 18 μg plus placebo. The primary end point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at day 85 (non-inferiority margin −50 mL; per-protocol [PP] population). Other end points included weighted mean FEV1 over 0–24 and 12–24 hours post-dose. Patient-reported outcomes comprised Transition Dyspnea Index score, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, and COPD Assessment Test score. Adverse events were also assessed. Results In total, 1,017 patients were randomized to treatment. In the PP population, 489 and 487 patients received UMEC and TIO, respectively. In the PP population, change from baseline in trough FEV1 was greater with UMEC versus TIO at day 85, meeting non-inferiority and superiority margins (difference: 59 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 29–88; P

Gregory Feldman,1 François Maltais,2 Sanjeev Khindri,3 Mitra Vahdati-Bolouri,3 Alison Church,4 William A Fahy,3 Roopa Trivedi4,5 1S. Carolina Pharmaceutical Research, Spartanburg, SC, USA; 2Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada; 3GSK, Respiratory Research and Development, Middlesex, UK; 4GSK, Respiratory and Immuno-Inflammation Research, Triangle Park, NC, USA; 5Pearl Therapeutics Inc., Durham, NC, USA Background: The long-acting muscarinic antagonists umeclidinium (UMEC) and tiotropium (TIO) are approved once-daily maintenance therapies for COPD. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of UMEC versus TIO in COPD. Methods: This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to UMEC 62.5µg plus placebo or TIO 18µg plus placebo. The primary end point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1second (FEV1) at day 85 (non-inferiority margin -50mL; per-protocol [PP] population). Other end points included weighted mean FEV1 over 0–24 and 12–24hours post-dose. Patient-reported outcomes comprised Transition Dyspnea Index score, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, and COPD Assessment Test score. Adverse events were also assessed. Results: In total, 1,017 patients were randomized to treatment. In the PP population, 489 and 487 patients received UMEC and TIO, respectively. In the PP population, change from baseline in trough FEV1 was greater with UMEC versus TIO at day 85, meeting non-inferiority and superiority margins (difference: 59mL; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 29–88; P

This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily umeclidinium 62.5 µg with once-daily glycopyrronium 50 µg in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This was a 12-week, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02236611). Patients were randomised 1:1 to umeclidinium 62.5 µg or glycopyrronium 50 µg administered via Ellipta or Breezhaler dry powder inhaler, respectively. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at day 85 in the per-protocol population. Other endpoints included: weighted mean FEV1 over 0–24 h and patient-reported outcomes (transition dyspnoea index score and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score). Adverse events were also assessed. A total of 1037 patients were randomised to treatment. Umeclidinium was non-inferior (margin: −50 mL) to glycopyrronium (trough FEV1 at day 85 treatment difference: 24 mL, 95% confidence intervals: −5–54). Improvements in other endpoints were similar between treatments. Adverse event incidences were similar for umeclidinium (37%) and glycopyrronium (36%). Once-daily umeclidinium was non-inferior to once-daily glycopyrronium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in trough FEV1 at day 85. Patient-reported outcomes and safety profiles were similar for both treatments., Once-daily umeclidinium is non-inferior to once-daily glycopyrronium in patients with COPD by trough FEV1 at day 85 http://ow.ly/4mRdE6

Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled once-daily ultra long-acting β2-agonist for the treatment of COPD. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study evaluated the effect of two-week treatment with indacaterol 300 μg on peak and isotime exercise inspiratory capacity (IC) in patients with COPD. Patients (40-80 years) with post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)70%, percent predicted FEV1 ≥ 40% and ≤ 80%, smoking history ≥ 20 pack-years and functional residual capacity120% of predicted normal were randomised to receive indacaterol 300 μg or placebo once-daily via a single-dose dry powder inhaler. Following 14 days of treatment, IC at peak and isotime during constant-load (80% of maximum workload) cycle ergometry was analysed using linear mixed-effects models. Safety and tolerability were also monitored. Twenty-seven patients (67% male; mean age, 61.3 years) were randomised; 24 completed the study. On Day 14, indacaterol showed statistically significant improvements over placebo in peak (317 mL [95% CI: 118-517]; p0.01) and isotime IC (268 mL [95% CI: 104-432]; p0.01). Statistically significant improvements were observed with indacaterol versus placebo on Day 14 for the following secondary endpoints: resting IC, trough FEV1, dyspnoea (BDI/TDI and Borg CR10 scale at isotime) and exercise endurance time. Indacaterol was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events or deaths. In conclusion, indacaterol 300 μg administered once-daily showed a clinically relevant increase in IC after 14 days of treatment, reflecting a reduction in dynamic hyperinflation.

Purpose QMF149 is a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting β 2 agonist, indacaterol and the corticosteroid, mometasone furoate that is currently under development for treatment of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We describe here a study designed to assess any pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or biopharmaceutical interaction between indacaterol and mometasone furoate when administered via the Breezhaler ® device, either alone or in a free or fixed combination (QMF149) in healthy adult subjects. Methods In this randomized, open-label, four-way crossover study, subjects were randomized to receive indacaterol acetate 150 μg, mometasone furoate 320 μg, alone and as free combination of the individual components, or QMF149 (indacaterol acetate 150 μg/mometasone furoate 320 μg) once daily for 14 days in each period, followed by a 7-day washout between periods. PK profiles were characterized on Day 14 up to 168 h post-dose. Results Indacaterol AUC 0-24h,ss and C max,ss after administration of QMF149 were 13% [ratio: 1.13; 90%CI: 1.09, 1.17] and 18% [ratio: 1.18; 90%CI: 1.12, 1.25] higher, respectively, than indacaterol monotherapy. Mometasone furoate AUC 0-24h,ss and C max,ss after administration of QMF149 were 14% [ratio: 1.14; 90%CI: 1.09, 1.20] and 19% [ratio: 1.19; 90%CI: 1.13, 1.26], higher, respectively than mometasone furoate monotherapy. The majority (three of four comparisons between QMF149 and monotherapy) of the 90% confidence intervals of the between-treatment ratios for AUC 0-24h,ss and C max,ss were within the 0.80 to 1.25 interval and therefore fulfilled bioequivalence criteria. The 90% confidence interval for C max,ss for MF for the QMF149 vs. monotherapy comparison was [1.13, 1.26]. Although no definitive data can be provided on the basis of the present study results, it is unlikely that the small observed differences in expsoure are clinically meaningful. Multiple inhaled doses of indacaterol and mometasone furoate, when administered alone, in free combination or as QMF149 were well tolerated. Conclusions The QMF149 fixed dose combination treatment showed comparable systemic exposure to the free combination and monotherapy treatments in terms of AUC 0-24h,ss and C max,ss for both indacaterol and mometasone furoate, indicating an absence of clinically relevant PK or biopharmaceutical interactions. These data support further development of QMF149 without dose adjustment.

This single-dose, 4-period crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the β2 -agonist indacaterol maleate and the corticosteroid mometasone furoate (MF) after inhalation of a fixed-dose combination (QMF149, indacaterol maleate/MF, 500/400 μg) via the Twisthaler (TH) device with and without activated charcoal and postdose mouth rinsing in healthy volunteers. The PK of indacaterol maleate 300 μg inhaled via the Breezhaler (BRZ) device was also characterized. Relative bioavailability of indacaterol and MF for inhalation with versus without charcoal, based on AUClast, was 0.25 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.35) and 0.70 (90%CI, 0.52-0.93), respectively. Thus, 25% and 70% of systemic exposure of indacaterol and MF, respectively was due to pulmonary absorption and 75% and 30%, respectively, was due to gastrointestinal absorption. Mouth rinsing reduced the systemic exposure of indacaterol by approximately 35% but had no relevant effect on the exposure of MF. Dose-normalized AUClast for indacaterol inhaled via the BRZ device was 2.3-fold higher than QMF149 via the TH device. All treatments had a good safety profile and were well tolerated. Data from this study and comparison with inhalation of indacaterol via the BRZ device suggest that the latter was more efficient than the TH device regarding lung delivery of indacaterol.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate influence of ethnic factors on the pharmacokinetics of orally inhaled QMF149, a novel combination of an approved long-acting β 2 -agonist, indacaterol (Onbrez® Breezhaler® for COPD), and an approved inhaled corticosteroid, mometasone furoate (MF), (Asmanex® Twisthaler® for asthma), following multiple dose administration of QMF149 (indacaterol acetate/MF) 150/80 μg and 150/320 μg via the Breezhaler® device in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Methods: This was a single-center, openlabel, multiple-dose, two-period, complete crossover study that randomized healthy Japanese and, age and weight matched Caucasian subjects to QMF149 150/80 μg or 150/320 μg once daily (o.d.) for 14 days in each period. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed up to 24 hours on days 1 and 14. Results: 24 Japanese and 24 Caucasian healthy subjects were enrolled. Indacaterol and MF had similar PK profiles across both the doses and both ethnic groups. The maximum geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval (CI)) for Japanese vs. Caucasian subjects for C max were 1.23 (1.11 - 1.38) and 1.24 (1.11 - 1.38) for indacaterol and MF, respectively. For AUC, the maximum ratios were 1.22 (1.09 - 1.36) and 1.30 (1.18 - 1.44) for indacaterol and MF, respectively. The mild trend towards higher exposure in Japanese subjects could be explained by the fact that the mean body weight was 14% higher for Caucasians compared to their Japanese counterparts. No serious adverse events or discontinuations related to study medication were reported. Conclusion: The study demonstrated increase of mean exposure parameters in Japanese subjects vs. Caucasian subjects, which ranged between 19 - 23% and 17 - 30%, for indacaterol and MF components, respectively. Multiple doses of both the QMF149 dose levels were safe and well-tolerated in all subjects. Body weight was considered a key contributory factor for the observed difference in exposure. These results suggest no dose adjustment for QMF149 is required in Asian populations.

Establishing robust in vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVC) between aerosol performance, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy is critical in developing bioequivalent drug-device combination products. Recent studies have demonstrated that realistic throat models tested under realistic test conditions may provide good IVIVC with respect to total lung deposition.The Alberta idealized throat (AIT) model was utilized with mean peak inspiratory flow rates determined from patient breathing studies. Various formulations of indacaterol (e.g., lactose blends, fixed dose combinations, engineered PulmoSphere™ particles) were tested in the AIT model and in clinical pharmacokinetic studies.Good IVIVC were observed with respect to total lung deposition, systemic delivery, and the contribution of oral absorption to systemic delivery, with percentage differences from the mean in vivo measurements15%, with most comparisons5%.Anatomical throat models represent an exciting tool to aid in formulation development of pharmaceutical aerosols.

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis is a rare, progressive cystic lung disorder characterised by dysregulated activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling.This was a phase IIa, multicentre, open-label study of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (2.5 mg·day−1 escalated to 10 mg·day−1) in 24 women with lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Primary endpoints were safety, pharmacokinetics and serum vascular endothelial growth factor-D (VEGF-D) levels; secondary endpoints were measures of lung function.Following 26 weeks of everolimus treatment, forced vital capacity exhibited stability, while forced expiration volume in 1 s improved from baseline, with mean changes (95% confidence interval) of 10 mL (−111–132) and 114 mL (11–217), respectively; 6-min walk distance improved by 47 m. Median VEGF-D and collagen IV levels decreased from baseline, from 1730 pg·mL−1 to 934.5 pg·mL−1, and 103 ng·mL−1 to 80.5 ng·mL−1, respectively. Adverse events were mostly grade 1−2; mouth ulceration, headache, nausea, stomatitis and fatigue were common. Serious adverse events suspected to be treatment related included peripheral oedema, pneumonia, cardiac failure and Pneumocystis jirovecii infection. Everolimus blood levels increased dose proportionally.In this study, everolimus improved some measures of lung function and exercise capacity and reduced serum VEGF-D and collagen IV. Side effects were generally consistent with known toxicities of mTOR inhibitors, although some were severe.