Search

Treatment-related adverse events in treated patients with MET amplification and/or MET IHC 2+/3+

Representativeness of study population

Purpose:The final analyses of the INSIGHT phase II study evaluating tepotinib (a selective MET inhibitor) plus gefitinib versus chemotherapy in patients with MET-altered EGFR-mutant NSCLC (data cut-off: September 3, 2021).Patients and Methods:Adults with advanced/metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC, acquired resistance to first-/second-generation EGFR inhibitors, and MET gene copy number (GCN) ≥5, MET:CEP7 ≥2, or MET IHC 2+/3+ were randomized to tepotinib 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) plus gefitinib 250 mg once daily, or chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). MET-amplified subgroup analysis was preplanned.Results:Overall (N = 55), median PFS was 4.9 months versus 4.4 months [stratified HR, 0.67; 90% CI, 0.35–1.28] with tepotinib plus gefitinib versus chemotherapy. In 19 patients with MET amplification (median age 60.4 years; 68.4% never-smokers; median GCN 8.8; median MET/CEP7 2.8; 89.5% with MET IHC 3+), tepotinib plus gefitinib improved PFS (HR, 0.13; 90% CI, 0.04–0.43) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.10; 90% CI, 0.02–0.36) versus chemotherapy. Objective response rate was 66.7% with tepotinib plus gefitinib versus 42.9% with chemotherapy; median duration of response was 19.9 months versus 2.8 months. Median duration of tepotinib plus gefitinib was 11.3 months (range, 1.1–56.5), with treatment >1 year in six (50.0%) and >4 years in three patients (25.0%). Seven patients (58.3%) had treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events with tepotinib plus gefitinib and five (71.4%) had chemotherapy.Conclusions:Final analysis of INSIGHT suggests improved PFS and OS with tepotinib plus gefitinib versus chemotherapy in a subgroup of patients with MET-amplified EGFR-mutant NSCLC, after progression on EGFR inhibitors.

Purpose K-MASTER project is a Korean national precision medicine platform that screened actionable mutations by analyzing next-generation sequencing (NGS) of solid tumor patients. We compared gene analyses between NGS panel from the K-MASTER project and orthogonal methods.Materials and Methods Colorectal, breast, non–small cell lung, and gastric cancer patients were included. We compared NGS results from K-MASTER projects with those of non-NGS orthogonal methods (KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer [CRC]; epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] fusion, and reactive oxygen species 1 [ROS1] fusion in non–small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], and Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) positivity in breast and gastric cancers).Results In the CRC cohort (n=225), the sensitivity and specificity of NGS were 87.4% and 79.3% (KRAS); 88.9% and 98.9% (NRAS); and 77.8% and 100.0% (BRAF), respectively. In the NSCLC cohort (n=109), the sensitivity and specificity of NGS for EGFR were 86.2% and 97.5%, respectively. The concordance rate for ALK fusion was 100%, but ROS1 fusion was positive in only one of three cases that were positive in orthogonal tests. In the breast cancer cohort (n=260), ERBB2 amplification was detected in 45 by NGS. Compared with orthogonal methods that integrated immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, sensitivity and specificity were 53.7% and 99.4%, respectively. In the gastric cancer cohort (n=64), ERBB2 amplification was detected in six by NGS. Compared with orthogonal methods, sensitivity and specificity were 62.5% and 98.2%, respectively.Conclusion The results of the K-MASTER NGS panel and orthogonal methods showed a different degree of agreement for each genetic alteration, but generally showed a high agreement rate.

The investigation by the integrated approach newly introduced for this study indicates that insulin resistance (IR) would develop first preferentially in the muscle tissue with a relatively low cell turnover and then progress in sequence to the subcutaneous adipose tissue, to the visceral adipose tissue, and to the liver with higher cell turnovers. Moreover, metabolic disruptions due to IR vary widely from tissue to tissue, contrary to the conventional notion that IR merely impairs glucose uptake in the whole body. This warrants that IR be divided better into four distinct tissue specific IRs: muscle insulin resistance (MIR), subcutaneous adipose insulin resistance (s-AIR), visceral adipose insulin resistance (v-AIR), and hepatic insulin resistance (HIR). Tissue-specific IRs developing in the order of MIR, s-AIR, v-AIR, and HIR – producing tissue specific metabolic disruptions – would amount to nothing but the whole body insulin resistance (WBIR) evolving in four distinctively insulin resistant stages. The four stage metabolic evolution from rapid weight gain to visceral obesity to rapid weight loss to full blown diabetes not only complies well with the natural development history of diabetes but also resolves most of the controversies regarding obesity or diabetes, including visceral obesity, obesity paradox, and dawn phenomenon that have long remained metabolic puzzles. In addition, the four-stage WBIR evolution model refutes the entrenched notion of the lipid-induced insulin resistance (LIIR) but supports instead the glycation-induced insulin resistance (GIIR) proposed in this study. A speculation is that the glycation reaction activated ever more with WBIR evolving may serve as the common thread connecting each other a cluster of disorders or diseases that are often collectively referred to as the metabolic syndrome, such as obesity, diabetes, cardio/cerebral vasculopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy.

Summary Background We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tepotinib, a potent and highly selective oral MET inhibitor, plus gefitinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET overexpression (immunohistochemistry [IHC]2+ or IHC3+) or MET amplification having acquired resistance to EGFR inhibition. Methods In this open-label, phase 1b/2, multicentre, randomised trial (the INSIGHT study), we enrolled adult patients (≥18 years) with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, from academic medical centres and community clinics in six Asian countries. In phase 1b, patients received oral tepotinib 300 mg or 500 mg plus gefitinib 250 mg once daily. In phase 2, patients with EGFR-mutant, T790M-negative NSCLC MET overexpression or MET amplification were randomly assigned (initially in a 1:1 ratio and then 2:1 following a protocol amendment) to tepotinib plus gefitinib at the recommended phase 2 dose or to standard platinum doublet chemotherapy. Randomisation was done centrally via an interactive voice-response system. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Subgroup analyses were preplanned in patients with high MET overexpression (IHC3+) or MET amplification (mean gene copy number ≥5 or MET to centromere of chromosome 7 ratio ≥2). Efficacy and patient characteristics were assessed on an intention-to-treat basis and safety was assessed for all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. Low recruitment led to early termination of phase 2, so all analyses are considered to be exploratory. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01982955 , and the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database, Eudra-CT 2016-001604-28. Findings From Dec 23, 2013, to May 25, 2017, 18 patients were enrolled in phase 1b (n=6 in the 300 mg tepotinib group; n=12 in the 500 mg tepotinib group) and 55 patients in phase 2 (n=31 in the tepotinib plus gefitinib group; n=24 in the chemotherapy group). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in phase 1b, so tepotinib 500 mg was used as the recommended phase 2 dose. In phase 2, survival outcomes were similar between groups: median PFS was 4·9 months in the tepotinib plus gefitinib group (90% CI 3·9–6·9) versus 4·4 months in the chemotherapy group (90% CI 4·2–6·8; hazard ratio [HR] 0·67, 90% CI 0·35–1·28). Median OS was 17·3 months in the tepotinib plus gefitinib group (12·1–37·3) versus 18·7 months in the chemotherapy group (15·9–20·7; HR 0·69, 0·34–1·41). PFS and OS were longer with tepotinib plus gefitinib than with chemotherapy in patients with high (IHC3+) MET overexpression (n=34; median PFS 8·3 months [4·1–16·6] vs 4·4 months [4·1–6·8]; HR 0·35, 0·17–0·74; median OS 37·3 months [90% CI 24·2–37·3] vs 17·9 months [12·0–20·7]; HR 0·33, 0·14–0·76) or MET amplification (n=19; median PFS 16·6 months [8·3–not estimable] vs 4·2 months [1·4–7·0]; HR 0·13, 0·04–0·43; median OS 37·3 months [90% CI not estimable] vs 13·1 months [3·25–not estimable]; HR 0·08, 0·01–0·51). The most frequent treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were increased amylase (5 [16%] of 31 patients) and lipase (4 [13%]) concentrations in the tepotinib plus gefitinib group and anaemia (7 [30%] of 23 patients) and decreased neutrophil count (3 [13%]) in the chemotherapy group. Interpretation Despite early study termination, in a preplanned subgroup analysis, our findings suggest improved anti activity for tepotinib plus gefitinib compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and MET amplification, warranting further exploration. Funding Merck KGaA.

Background Even though Korea was known to have the highest number of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection in the early phase of the pandemic, Korea was able to successfully flatten the curve in a short period of time without extreme measures. We compared the status of cancer management before and after COVID-19 and analysed how cancer care continuity was maintained in Korea. Patients and methods We investigated the medical records on the number of cancer diagnosis, cancer surgery, radiation therapy and scheduled chemotherapy conducted in Korea University Anam Hospital from January 1 to April 30, 2019 and from the same period in 2020. We also collected the data of metastatic cancer patients who were hospitalised due to respiratory disease. Results Of all diagnoses, 1694 cancer diagnoses were made in the study period of 2019, and 1445 diagnoses in 2020 (decreased by 14.7%); the cancer surgery performed 830 and 800 cases; the set-up for radiation therapy decreased from 185 to 140 cases; the number of systemic chemotherapies for metastatic cancer patients treated in department of medical oncology increased from 2555 to 2878 cases. Among hospitalised patients, emergency centre visit, intensive care unit admission, discharge after recovery and death reveal no drastic changes. Conclusions Routine cancer care for patients with metastatic cancer has been maintained without significant difference before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The Korean government's innovative countermeasures in the early phase of outbreak made it possible for cancer care practitioners to provide cancer patients with regular care under the standard infection control protocol., Highlights • Routine cancer care has been maintained before and after the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. • The Korean government's innovative countermeasures were important. • Information provided will help you understand public health in pandemic times.

Simple Summary We have developed and analytically validated the Korean Pan-cancer Companion Diagnostic (CDX) Panel to apply targeted anticancer drugs to Korean patients based on the molecular characteristics of tumors using tumor samples without matched patient normal samples. The panel included 31 genes with reported single nucleotide variants, 9 genes with reported copy number variations, and 15 genes with predictive responses to targeted drugs under clinical testing, enabling the panel to be analyzed for the targets of 30 targeted anticancer drugs. It is cost-effective and optimized for cancer type-specific therapy in Korean cancer patients across solid cancer types while minimizing the limitations of existing approaches. This gene screening method is expected to reduce test turnaround time and cost, making it a balanced approach to investigate solid cancer-related gene regions. Abstract Recently, several panels using two representative targeting methods have been developed but they do not reflect racial specificity, especially for Asians. We have developed and analytically validated the Korean Pan-cancer Companion Diagnostic (CDX) Panel to apply targeted anticancer drugs to Korean patients based on the molecular characteristics of tumors using tumor samples without matched patient normal samples. The panel included 31 genes with reported single nucleotide variants, 9 genes with reported copy number variations, and 15 genes with predictive responses to targeted drugs under clinical testing, enabling the panel to be analyzed for the targets of 30 targeted anticancer drugs. It is cost-effective and optimized for cancer type-specific therapy in Korean cancer patients across solid cancer types while minimizing the limitations of existing approaches. In addition, the optimized filtering protocol for somatic variants from tumor-only samples enables researchers to use this panel without matched normal samples. To verify the panel, 241 frozen tumor tissues and 71 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from several institutes were registered. This gene screening method is expected to reduce test turnaround time and cost, making it a balanced approach to investigate solid cancer-related gene regions.

Background “End of life” is a difficult topic of conversation in East Asian cultures, even among patients and doctors who share a good rapport. In 2016, the Hospice, Palliative Care, and Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act, which took the form of “Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment,” was introduced in South Korea. This study was conducted to investigate the completion rate of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment in patients with advanced cancer on the active recommendation of physicians, as well as patients’ general attitudes toward end-of-life care. Methods We conducted a preliminary, cross-sectional descriptive survey on patients with advanced cancer. A total of 101 patients with advanced solid cancer agreed to participate in the study. The primary endpoint was the rate of completion of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment based on a doctor’s suggestion. Written interviews were conducted to understand the perceptions and factors influencing patients’ decisions. Results Of the 101 patients, 72 (71.3%) agreed to prepare Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment. Patients who had an educational level of high school or higher were more likely to agree to complete Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment documentation as compared to the lower educational status group. More than half of the respondents who completed Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment documentation reported that they had more than a fair understanding of “life-sustaining care” or “Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment.” Participants’ reasons for Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment completion were diverse. Conclusions We found that highly educated patients, who understood the concept behind the policy well, tended to accept Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment without hesitation. Better education, information shared through the media, and conversations with health care providers might improve understanding of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment in patients with cancer.

Introduction: In the INSIGHT trial primary analysis (NCT01982955; median follow-up: 21.8 months), tepotinib (a potent, highly selective, once daily [QD] MET inhibitor) + gefitinib improved efficacy vs chemotherapy (CTX) in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and resistance to anti-EGFR therapy due to MET amplification (Wu et al, Lancet Respir Med 2020). Here we report final analyses from INSIGHT (data cut-off: September 3, 2021; median follow-up: 57.5 months). Methods: Patients with EGFR-mutant (T790M-negative) NSCLC and anti-EGFR resistance, with MET gene copy number (GCN) ≥5 and/or MET:CEP7 ≥2 by FISH and/or MET IHC 2+/3+, were randomized to tepotinib 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) + gefitinib 250 mg QD or CTX. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator. Preplanned analyses evaluated patients with MET amplification. Results: In the 19/55 randomized patients (34.5%) with MET amplification (GCN ≥5, n=18; MET:CEP7 ≥2, n=13; MET IHC 3+, n=17), median age was 60.4 years, 68.4% were never-smokers, and prior EGFR inhibitors were gefitinib (57.9%), afatinib (21.1%), erlotinib (10.5%) and icotinib (10.5%). Median duration of tepotinib + gefitinib was 11.3 months (range: 1.1-56.5), with treatment duration >1 year in 6 patients (31.6%) and >4 years in 3 patients (15.8%). Two patients continued treatment outside the study. Tepotinib + gefitinib improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04, 0.43), overall survival (HR 0.10; 95% CI 0.02, 0.36), objective response rate and duration of response vs CTX (Table). Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 7 patients (58.3%) with tepotinib + gefitinib and 5 (71.4%) with CTX. Most common post-study therapies were kinase inhibitors (n=2 in the tepotinib + gefitinib arm; n=3 in the CTX arm). In patients with MET IHC 3+ (n=34; including 17 patients with MET amplification), tepotinib + gefitinib also markedly improved PFS (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.17, 0.74) and OS (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23, 0.84) vs CTX. Conclusions: Tepotinib + gefitinib greatly improved PFS and OS vs CTX in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with MET amplification. INSIGHT 2 is evaluating tepotinib + osimertinib in this setting. Table. Summary of efficacy and safety data in patients with MET amplification Endpoint Tepotinib + gefitinib (n=12) CTX (n=7) PFS Events, n (%) 7 (58) 7 (100) Median, months (90% CI) 16.6 (8.3, 22.1) 4.2 (1.4, 7.0) HR (90% CI) 0.13 (0.04, 0.43) OS* Events, n (%) 7 (58) 7 (100) Median, months (90% CI) 37.3 (21.1, 52.1) 13.1 (3.3, 22.6) HR (90% CI) 0.10 (0.02, 0.36) ORR n (%) [90% CI] 8 (66.7) [39.1, 87.7] 3 (42.9) [12.9, 77.5] OR (90% CI) 2.67 (0.37, 19.56) DOR Median, months (90% CI) 19.9 (7.0, NE) 2.8 (2.8, NE) Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs†, n (%) Amylase increased 4 (33.3) 0 Lipase increased 4 (33.3) 0 Anemia 0 2 (28.6) Neutrophil count decreased 0 2 (28.6) WBC count decreased 0 2 (28.6) *Post-study therapy included an EGFR inhibitor ± a MET inhibitor in two patients in each arm (tepotinib + gefitinib arm: osimertinib ± cabozantinib [n=1], gefitinib + cabozantinib [n=1]; CTX arm: erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib ± crizotinib [n=1], osimertinib [n=1]). Post-study CTX was received by one patient in the tepotinib + gefitinib arm and two patients in the CTX arm.†Reported in >20% of patients in either arm. AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval; CTX, chemotherapy; DOR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; NE, not estimable; ORR, objective response rate; OR, odds ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; WBC, white blood cell. Citation Format: Chong Kin Liam, Azura Rozila Ahmad, Te-Chun Hsia, Jianying Zhou, Dong-Wan Kim, Ross Andrew Soo, Ying Cheng, Shun Lu, Sang Won Shin, James Chih-Hsin Yang, Yiping Zhang, Jun Zhao, Rolf Bruns, Andreas Johne, Yi-Long Wu. Tepotinib + gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with MET amplification: Final analysis of INSIGHT [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT538.

Mutations in the EGFR gene downstream signaling pathways may cause receptor-independent pathway activation, making tumors unresponsive to EGFR inhibitors. However, the clinical significance of RAS, PIK3CA or PTEN mutations in NSCLC is unclear. In this study, patients who were initially diagnosed with NSCLC or experienced recurrence after surgical resection were enrolled, and blood samples was collected. Ultra-deep sequencing analysis of cfDNA using Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 with Proton platforms was conducted. RAS/PIK3CA/PTEN mutations were frequently detected in cfDNA in stage IV NSCLC (58.1%), and a high proportion of the patients (47.8%) with mutations had bone metastases at diagnosis. The frequency of RAS/PIK3CA/PTEN mutations in patients with activating EGFR mutation was 61.7%. The median PFS for EGFR-TKIs was 15.1 months in patients without RAS/PIK3CA/PTEN mutations, and 19.9 months in patients with mutations (p = 0.549). For patients with activating EGFR mutations, the overall survival was longer in patients without RAS/PIK3CA/PTEN mutations (53.8 months vs. 27.4 months). For the multivariate analysis, RAS/PIK3CA/PTEN mutations were independent predictors of poor prognosis in patients with activating EGFR mutations. In conclusion, RAS, PIK3CA and PTEN mutations do not hamper EGFR-TKI treatment outcome, however, they predict a poor OS when activating EGFR mutations coexist.

Purpose Evaluation of symptoms and signs for the management of neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) is challenging. This study aimed to identify clinical predictors of NCP and symptoms and signs most relevant of those in Korean patients. Methods This nationwide, descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study included 2,003 cancer patients aged ≥20 years who reported a visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥1 for pain and provided informed consent for participation. The Douleur Neuropathic (DN4) questionnaire (score ≥4) was used to determine symptoms and signs as well as the presence of NCP. Results The prevalence of NCP was associated with age 6 months (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.232–2.012), stage IV cancer (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.593–0.955), history of chemotherapy (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.225–2.472), and moderate-to-severe cancer pain (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.671–2.524) after multivariate analysis. The most common descriptive symptoms of NCP were tingling, electric shock, and pins and needles. For NCP patients in the presence or absence of the clinical predictors, pins and needles (p = 0.001) and painful cold (p Conclusion Age 6 months, stage IV cancer, history of chemotherapy, and moderate-to-severe cancer pain, were identified as predictors of NCP. Some symptoms and signs of NCP were associated with these predictors. Further studies are warranted on the pathogenesis and management of NCP with respect to the symptoms and signs, and factors associated with pain severity in Korean patients.

// Myung Han Hyun 1, 2, * , Jae Sook Sung 2, * , Eun Joo Kang 1 , Yoon Ji Choi 1 , Kyong Hwa Park 1 , Sang Won Shin 1 , Sung Yong Lee 3 and Yeul Hong Kim 1, 2 1 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea 2 Cancer Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea 3 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Yeul Hong Kim, email: yhk0215@korea.ac.kr Keywords: cell-free DNA concentration, prognostic value, non-small-cell lung cancer Received: July 05, 2017 Accepted: September 21, 2017 Published: October 10, 2017 ABSTRACT We used computed tomography (CT) to explore the prognostic value of cell-free (cf) DNA quantification and its predictive efficacy over time after chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In total, 177 NSCLC patients were enrolled in a prospective biomarker trial. Consecutive paired blood collection was performed to determine cfDNA concentrations at baseline CT and throughout serial follow-ups. The best cfDNA cut-off value to predict progression-free and overall survival was determined using X-tile analysis. Among 112 chemo-naive patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma, 43 were available for follow-up analysis. Cox regression multivariate analysis indicated that a high cfDNA concentration was an independent negative prognostic factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.60; 95% confidence interval: 1.65-4.10; p = 0.008) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.63; 95% confidence interval: 1.66-4.17; p < 0.001). However, cfDNA concentration changes during treatment did not correlate with radiological CT responses at first follow-up or best response. No pattern was noted in the percent change in the cfDNA concentration from baseline or subsequently measured level to progression. The serum cfDNA concentration is thus associated with NSCLC patient prognosis, but does not appear to be a clinically valid marker for tumor responses.

Even though it has long been known that diabetes develops in distinctive stages over a long span of time, no comprehensive diabetes development model has been developed yet. Insulin resistance (IR) plays a central role in development of diabetes. A widespread belief regarding IR is that it is a global parameter affecting the whole body simultaneously by impairing merely glucose uptake in tissues. However, the analysis by a new methodology that we have named integrated approach suggests that IR not merely impairs glucose uptake in tissues but also produces tissue-specific metabolic disruptions varying widely from tissue to tissue, and that IR would not necessarily develop simultaneously over the whole body but instead develop first preferentially in the muscle tissue with a relatively low cell turnover and then progress in sequence to the subcutaneous adipose tissue to the visceral adipose tissue to the liver with higher cell turnovers. This is the most important rationale for subdividing IR into four distinct tissue-specific IRs: muscle insulin resistance (MIR), subcutaneous adipose insulin resistance (s-AIR), visceral adipose insulin resistance (v-AIR), and hepatic insulin resistance (HIR). Sequential development of tissue-specific IRs, in the order of MIR, s-AIR, v-AIR, and HIR, producing tissue-specific metabolic disruptions, is nothing but the whole body insulin resistance (WBIR) evolving in four distinctively insulin-resistant stages. Four-stage evolution from rapid weight gain to visceral obesity to rapid weight loss to full-blown diabetic state not only complies well with the natural development history of diabetes, but also resolves most of controversies on diabetes or obesity. Development of the four-stage WBIR evolution model, which also refutes the entrenched notion of the lipid-induced insulin resistance (LIIR) but instead supports the glycation-induced insulin resistance (GIIR) proposed in this study, may possibly be considered a breakthrough in study of diabetes as well as obesity.

Background: “End of life” is a difficult topic of conversation in East Asian cultures, even among patients and doctors who share a good rapport. In 2016, the Hospice, Palliative Care, and Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act, which took the form of “Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment,” was introduced in South Korea. This study was conducted to investigate the completion rate of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment in patients with advanced cancer on the active recommendation of physicians, as well as patients’ general attitudes toward end-of-life care. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive survey on patients with advanced cancer. A total of 101 patients with advanced solid cancer agreed to participate in the study. The primary endpoint was the rate of completion of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment based on a doctor’s suggestion. Written interviews were conducted to understand the perceptions and factors influencing patients’ decisions. Results: Of the 101 patients, 72 (71.3%) agreed to prepare Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment. Patients who had an educational level of high school or higher were more likely to agree to complete Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment documentation as compared to the lower educational status group. More than half of the respondents who completed Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment documentation reported that they had more than a fair understanding of “life-sustaining care” or “Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment.” Participants’ reasons for Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment completion were diverse. Conclusions: We found that highly educated patients, who understood the concept behind the policy well, tended to accept Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment without hesitation. Better education, information shared through the media, and conversations with health care providers might improve understanding of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment in patients with cancer.

This study unravels the significance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) quantification as a promising measure of the biological behavior/aggressiveness of tumors. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) measured by positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan enable a precise assessment of metabolic tumor burden. However, their clinical implications in identifying patients who need more aggressive treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not fully understood.In the current prospective trial, we analyzed 101 newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC (stage III-IV) patients with measurable baseline MTV, TLG, and cfDNA quantification. The best cut-offs for cfDNA levels, MTV, and TLG to predict progression-free survival and overall survival were determined using X-tile analysis.There were significant positive correlations between cfDNA and MTV (r = 0.488, p 0.001) and between cfDNA and TLG (r = 0.554, p 0.001). High-cfDNA levels and high-MTV/TLG negatively correlated with overall survival (OS) (all p 0.001). Patients with high-MTV showed similar median OS irrespective of their cfDNA levels (low-cfDNA vs. high-cfDNA=9.2 vs 6.6 months; p 0.05). However, patients with low-MTV and low-cfDNA levels showed longer OS than those with low-MTV and high-cfDNA levels (low-cfDNA vs. high-cfDNA=49.3 vs 11.5 months; p 0.001). The patient group with low-TLG also showed similar trends. The cfDNA level was an independent prognostic factor for OS by Cox-proportional hazard analysis.Although the patients with high metabolic tumor burden had a poor prognosis, regardless of the biological behavior/aggressiveness of the tumor, patients with low metabolic tumor burden and high cfDNA levels showed a poor prognosis. Taken together, this study indicates a stronger prognostic value of baseline cfDNA levels in identifying patients with advanced NSCLC and personalizing their treatment strategies for better survival.

Summary Background There are few effective treatment options for patients with recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Pembrolizumab showed antitumour activity and manageable toxicity in early-phase trials. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care therapy for the treatment of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Methods We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study at 97 medical centres in 20 countries. Patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma that progressed during or after platinum-containing treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease (or both), or whose disease recurred or progressed within 3–6 months of previous multimodal therapy containing platinum for locally advanced disease, were randomly assigned (1:1) in blocks of four per stratum with an interactive voice-response and integrated web-response system to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks intravenously or investigator's choice of standard doses of methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab intravenously (standard-of-care group). The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in the as-treated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02252042, and is no longer enrolling patients. Findings Between Dec 24, 2014, and May 13, 2016, 247 patients were randomly allocated to pembrolizumab and 248 were randomly allocated to standard of care. As of May 15, 2017, 181 (73%) of 247 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 207 (83%) of 248 patients in the standard-of-care group had died. Median overall survival in the intention-to-treat population was 8·4 months (95% CI 6·4–9·4) with pembrolizumab and 6·9 months (5·9–8·0) with standard of care (hazard ratio 0·80, 0·65–0·98; nominal p=0·0161). Fewer patients treated with pembrolizumab than with standard of care had grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events (33 [13%] of 246 vs 85 [36%] of 234). The most common treatment-related adverse event was hypothyroidism with pembrolizumab (in 33 [13%] patients) and fatigue with standard of care (in 43 [18%]). Treatment-related death occurred in four patients treated with pembrolizumab (unspecified cause, large intestine perforation, malignant neoplasm progression, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome) and two patients treated with standard of care (malignant neoplasm progression and pneumonia). Interpretation The clinically meaningful prolongation of overall survival and favourable safety profile of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma support the further evaluation of pembrolizumab as a monotherapy and as part of combination therapy in earlier stages of disease. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Biliary tract cancer is a heterogenous group. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin has been the standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer, but there is lack of evidence on treatment in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). We analyzed 29 patients with only IHC who received gemcitabine plus cisplatin between June 2010 and February 2013. The median age was 63 years (range, 40-78 years), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of all patients was

Purpose We recently reported on a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing pemetrexed-cisplatin chemotherapy followed by gefitinib maintenance therapy (PC/G) with gefitinib monotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report on a post hoc subgroup analysis of that study assessing the demographics and disposition of the Korean patient subgroup, and comparing the tolerability of PC/G and gefitinib monotherapy and the tumor response with respect to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status. Materials and methods Patients, who were ≥ 18 years, chemonaive, Korean, light ex-smokers/never-smokers with advanced NSCLC, were randomly assigned (1:1) to PC/G or gefitinib monotherapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were graded, and tumor response was measured as change in lesion sum from baseline at best response. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials. gov, NCT01017874. Results Overall, 111 Korean patients were treated (PC/G, 51; gefitinib, 60). Between-arm characteristics were balanced and similar to those of the overall population. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were low (PC/G: 1, 2.0%; gefitinib: 7, 11.7%). Overall, 92 patients (82.9%) reported ≥ 1 TEAE (PC/G, 44; gefitinib, 48); few patients (PC/G, 16; gefitinib, 7) reported severe TEAEs; the most frequent was neutropenia (PC/G arm) and elevated alanine aminotransferase (gefitinib arm). The lesion sum was decreased by PC/G treatment in most patients, regardless of EGFR mutation status, while gefitinib monotherapy reduced the lesion sum in EGFR-positive patients but had no effect in EGFR-negative patients. Conclusion Our results confirm that both PC/G and gefitinib were well tolerated in Korean patients, regardless of EGFR status; however, patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC may not benefit from gefitinib monotherapy.

Objective: This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the incidence of and risk factors for febrile neutropenia (FN) during adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). Methods: A multicenter survey of three tertiary hospitals was conducted, with data extracted from the records of ESBC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy containing AC (doxorubicin, 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 every 21 days). Assessments included clinical characteristics, chemotherapy dose modifications, and incidence of FN. Results: A total of 610 patients were included for analysis. The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia and FN was 44.6 and 8.5%, respectively. Reduced relative dose intensity (RDI) less than 85% occurred in 11.0% of patients, and there were treatment delays in 12.6% of patients. Multivariate analysis identified several independent predictors for FN, including the presence of grade 4 neutropenia and pretreatment calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min. Conclusion: Patients with ESBC are at substantial risk for FN and reduced RDI when treated with adjuvant AC chemotherapy. Predictive models based on risk factors identified in this study should enable the selective application of supportive measures in an effort to deliver the full dose of chemotherapy.

9571 Background: Lazertinib (YH25448) is a highly mutant-selective, irreversible 3rd-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets the activating EGFR mutations (Del19 and L858R), as well as the T790M mutation, while sparing wild type. Brain metastasis (BM) are common in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Lazertinib showed a high blood-brain barrier penetration profile in preclinical studies. We report intracranial response data in pts with advanced NSCLC from a Phase I/II study of lazertinib (NCT03046992). Methods: Pts with advanced NSCLC, who had progressed after prior EGFR-TKI therapy, were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study with dose-escalation, dose-expansion and dose-extension phases. Brain MRI was done in all pts at baseline. Pts with asymptomatic BM were eligible for enrollment. Intracranial anti-tumor activity of lazertinib was analysed in pts with BM present on baseline brain scan. Pre-defined intracranial endpoints included objective intracranial response rate (OIRR) and intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS) by independent central review (ICR). The brain metastasis full analysis population included pts with measurable and/or non-measurable BM lesion present on baseline brain scan; the brain metastasis population evaluable for response included only pts with measurable BM lesion. Results: As of 30 Sep 2019, a total of 181 pts received at least one dose of lazertinib 20-320 mg across 7 dose levels. Of those, 64 pts (56% female, median age 63, 86% T790M mutation positive by central testing) were included in the brain metastasis full analysis population; Intracranial disease control rate (IDCR) was 90.6% (58/64; 95% CI 83.5, 97.8) and median IPFS was not reached (95% CI 14.0, NR). In the brain metastasis population evaluable for response, a total of 22 pts were included; OIRR and IDCR were 54.5% (12/22; 95% CI 33.7, 75.4) and 90.9% (20/22; 95% CI 78.9, 100), respectively. In 13 pts (7.2%) out of 181 pts, brain was the first site of disease progression by existing and/or new lesions. Conclusions: Lazertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful activity against BM, aligned with preclinical data. Clinical trial information: NCT03046992 .

9572 Background: Lazertinib (YH25448) is a highly mutant-selective, irreversible 3rd-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets the activating EGFR mutations (Del19 and L858R), as well as the T790M mutation, while sparing wild type. We report the efficacy and safety results of lazertinib 240 mg as recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) from a phase I/II study of lazertinib (NCT03046992). Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC, who had progressed after prior EGFR-TKI therapy were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study with dose-escalation (20-320 mg), dose-expansion (40-240 mg) and dose-extension phases. Pts were assessed for safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy. For dose-expansion and extension phases, tumors had to be T790M mutation-positive (T790M+). Of all 78 pts assigned to lazertinib 240 mg dose level across all phases, 76 pts with centrally confirmed T790M+ were included for efficacy analysis. Results: As of 30 Sep 2019, a total of 78 pts (49% female, median age 62) received at least one dose of lazertinib 240 mg. The median duration of follow-up was 9.6 months and 44 pts were ongoing at data cut-off. Of 78 pts, 76 pts with centrally confirmed T790M+ showed the objective response rate (ORR) 57.9% (95% CI 46.8, 69.0), the disease control rate (DCR) 89.5% (95% CI 82.6, 96.4), the median progression-free survival (PFS) 11.0 months (95% CI 5.6, 16.4) and the median duration of response (DoR) 13.8 months (95% CI 9.6, NR) by independent central review (ICR), respectively. Two pts (3%) experienced a confirmed complete response. The investigator-assessed ORR, DCR, median PFS and median DoR were 72.4% (95% CI 62.3, 82.4), 94.7% (95% CI 89.7, 99.8), 13.2 months (95% CI 9.6, not reached) and 11.8 months (95% CI 8.4, not reached), respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at the 240 mg dose regardless of its causality were rash (35%), pruritus (33%) and paraesthesia (32%), which were mostly mild (Grade ≥3 rash: 1%; no Grade ≥3 pruritus or paraesthesia). TEAEs leading to dose reduction and dose discontinuation were observed in 13% (10/78) and 8% (4/78), respectively. Drug related TEAEs of grade ≥3 were observed in 6% (5/78). Conclusions: Lazertinib 240 mg has a favorable safety profile, and exhibits promising anti-tumor activity in pts with EGFR T790M+ NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03046992 .

9601 Background: While EGFR mutant ( EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients usually experience improved clinical benefit with EGFR TKIs, most eventually progress. Understanding mechanisms of resistance (MoR) may allow for more personalized treatment. Lazertinib is an irreversible third generation EGFR TKI for which MoR are unknown. Obtaining sufficient tumor tissue for genotyping at progression is often difficult. Therefore, we utilized plasma ctDNA from patients treated with lazertinib to explore MoR. Methods: Plasma samples from 47 NSCLC patients in the phase 2 trial of lazertinib (NCT03046992) were collected at screening and progressive disease (PD) and underwent ctDNA NGS of 74 genes using Guarant360. All patients were positive for an EGFR Ex19del or L858R ( EGFRm) and T790M by tissue testing at screening. Acquired, nonsynonymous, characterized mutations detected in a PD sample but not in the screening sample from the respective patient were considered putative MoR, excluding aneuploidy. Patients with detectable plasma EGFRm and/or T790M at screening were evaluable. Results: ctDNA was detected in 47 (100%) screening samples and 43/45 (96%) PD samples (two failed sequencing). An EGFRm was detected in 85% of patients at screening (n = 40), 38 of which had PD ctDNA results and were included in analysis. T790M was detected in 30 patients at screening and subsequently not detected at PD in 21 of these patients, 55% of all 38 included patients. Among the ten patients with T790M detected at PD, on-target MoR were detected in 7 (18% of all included patients) including EGFR C797S (n = 3, 8%), EGFR amplification (n = 3, 8%), and EGFR T854A (n = 1, 3%). All C797S were in cis with T790M. No on-target MoR were detected in patients without T790M detected at PD. Off-target MoR were seen in 34% of patients (13/38) including mutations in PIK3CA (13%; 2 E545K, 2 E542K, 1 E81K), ERBB2 (5%; 1 D769H, 1 V777L), KRAS (3%; 1 G12C), and BRAF (3%; 1 G469A). Gene amplifications were detected in CCND1 (n = 1, 3%) , CCNE1 (n = 2, 5%) , ERBB2 (n = 1, 3%) , FGFR1 (n = 1, 3%) , MET (n = 4, 11%) , and PIK3CA (n = 1, 3%), with some patients having multiple MoR. Conclusions: The spectrum of MoR identified in this cohort of patients treated with lazertinib is similar to that reported in other third generation EGFR TKIs, but with some differences in frequencies. The most common resistance mechanisms are T790M loss and PIK3CA alterations which may address the mechanism of action. Our findings suggest putative MoR of lazertinib and show that ctDNA NGS is an effective way to identify MoR in patients progressing on targeted therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03046992 .

Purpose Neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) is a common and potentially debilitating symptom in cancer patients. We investigated the prevalence of NCP, as well as its management and association with QOL. Methods Cancer patients with pain ≥1 on the visual analogue scale (VAS) were surveyed with the Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) questionnaire, the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), and the EuroQOL five dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The associations between NCP and pain severity or NCP and QOL, while controlling for variables relevant to QOL, were then analyzed. Results A total of 2003 patients were enrolled in this survey; the prevalence of NCP was 36.0% (n = 722, 95% CI, 32.5–39.5). We found that NCP in cancer patients was closely correlated to a higher pain severity (BPI-SF; 4.96 ± 1.94 versus 4.24 ± 2.02, p

Background The impact of meat consumption on high blood pressure (HBP) and obesity in children and adolescents is a subject of debate. The aim of this study was thus to evaluate the association between meat consumption and both HBP and obesity in this group. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis using nationally representative samples of children and adolescents aged 9, 12, and 15 years old (n = 136,739) who were included in the Korea School Health Examination Survey (KSHES) for the 2011–2015 period. Multiple linear and logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors influencing systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) levels, and to test the strength of these relationships. Results Adjusted for covariates, 6.3% of those subjects who consumed >5 servings of meat (including beef, pork, and chicken) per week were obese, compared with 9.1% of the subjects who consumed 5 servings of meat/wk (systolic HBP adjusted OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.05–1.62; P ≤0.01, diastolic HBP adjusted OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.02–1.54; P 5 servings of meat/wk, those who consumed 0.05). In contrast, BMI was significantly associated with milk, fruits, and vegetables (P

We report a case of a 56-year-old woman with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a BRCA1 gene mutation. Evidence is mounting that there is a large increase in the risk for hematologic malignancies among patients with genetic changes in the BRCA pathways. The genomic analysis demonstrated a frameshift mutation in the BRCA1 gene: 277_279delinsCC (Phe93fs). It is a novel BRCA1 mutation that has never been reported, and caused malignant lymphoma as well as breast and ovarian cancer.

Purpose There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who failed gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This study was conducted in order to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of modified methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) in patients with metastatic UC previously treated with GC. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who received modified MVAC between November 2004 and November 2012. All patients failed prior, first-line GC chemotherapy. Results The median age of patients was 64.0 years (range, 33.0 to 77.0 years), and 23 (82.1%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 36.0% and 64.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 38 weeks (range, 5 to 182 weeks), median progression free survival was 21.0 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3 to 35.7 weeks) and median overall survival was 49.0 weeks (95% CI, 18.8 to 79.3 weeks). Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (n=21, 75.0%) and anemia (n=9, 32.1%). Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities did not occur and there was no treatment-related death. Conclusion Modified MVAC appears to be a safe and active chemotherapy regimen in patients with stable physical status and adequate renal function after GC treatment.

This study aimed at evaluating the clinical severity and treatment outcomes of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) and identifying predictors associated with mortality in patients with malignancy. A retrospective study was conducted in a teaching hospital from January 2004 to June 2013. The subjects included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) receiving treatment for malignancy whose conditions were complicated by CDI. Clinical severity was determined using the guidelines from the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (SHEA/IDSA). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors independently associated with CDI-related mortality. Of the 5,594 patients treated for malignancy at the Division of Hematology/Oncology during the study period, 61 (1.1 %) had CDI complications. CDI-related mortality was 19.7 % (12/61). Twenty-seven (44.3 %) patients were diagnosed with neutropenia (ANC ≤500/mm3) at initial CDI presentation. Forty-one patients (67.2 %) received antimicrobial therapy for CDI. Based on the SHEA/IDSA guidelines, only 12 patients (19.7 %) presented with severe CDI, but 25 (61.0 %) patients experienced treatment failure. Multiple logistic regression modeling showed neutropenia to be an independent risk factor for CDI-related mortality (odds ratio, 5.17; 95 % confidence interval, 1.24–21.59). This study tracked poor CDI treatment outcomes in patients with malignancy and identified neutropenia as a previously unrecognized risk factor of CDI-related mortality. Alternative definitions of severe CDI that include neutropenia might be necessary to more accurately determine clinical severity.

Purpose Mutations affecting the KRAS gene are an established negative predictor for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the role of KRAS mutation as a biomarker for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) remains controversial. Materials and Methods We analyzed retrospective data from 32 CRC patients who were available for KRAS mutation status and received cytotoxic chemotherapy plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy. Six of 32 patients received anti-EGFR therapies. We used KRAS mutation status as a predictive or prognostic factor in CRC patients receiving bevacizumab. Results We observed mutations in KRAS in 59.4% of patients. Bevacizumab was used in combination with oxaliplatin based regimens. There was no significant difference for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with oxaliplatin based cytotoxic chemotherapy plus bevacizumab according to the status of KRAS mutation. After first-line therapy, 28 patients (87.5%) received second-line therapy. In univariate analysis, KRAS mutations did not have a major prognostic value for PFS (hazard ratio, 1.007; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.469 to 2.162; p>0.05) or OS (hazard ratio, 0.548; 95% CI, 0.226 to 1.328; p>0.05). In addition, anti-EGFR therapies did not affect the impact on OS. Conclusion KRAS mutation is neither a predictive for bevacizumab nor a prognostic for OS in CRC patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy.

9037 Background: Lazertinib (YH25448) is a highly mutant-selective, irreversible 3rd-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets the activating EGFR mutations (Del19 and L858R), as well as the T790M mutation, while sparing wild type. We report the updated results from a Phase I/II study of lazertinib (NCT03046992). Methods: Patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC who had progressed after treatment with standard EGFR-TKIs with/without asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study with dose-escalation and expansion cohorts. Lazertinib was administered once daily at doses between 20 to 320 mg in a 21-day cycle. Patients were assessed for safety, tolerability and efficacy. T790M mutation was required in the dose-expansion cohorts. Results: As of 26 Nov 2018, a total of 127 patients were enrolled. The dose-escalation cohort included 38 patients administered with 20 to 320 mg across 7 dose levels, and 89 patients in the dose-expansion cohort were administered with 40 to 240 mg across 5 dose levels. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The median duration of treatment was 9.7 months and 58 patients are still ongoing. The objective response rate (ORR) was 60% in all patients, 64% in T790M+ patients, and 37% in T790M- patients by investigators assessment. In BM patients with measurable lesion (n = 14), the intracranial ORR was 50%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.1 months in all patients, 9.5 months in T790M+ patients, and 5.4 months in T790M- patients. Subgroup analysis showed that ORR was 65% and PFS was 12.2 months in T790M+ patients with ≥ 120 mg (n = 62). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were pruritus (27%), rash (24%), constipation (20%), decreased appetite (19%) and diarrhea (14%). TEAEs leading to dose discontinuation were observed in 3% of patients. Drug related TEAEs of grade ≥ 3 was observed in 3% of the patients. Conclusions: Lazertinib was safe, well-tolerated and exhibits promising systemic and intracranial antitumor activity in EGFR T790M+ NSCLC patients. Dose extension cohorts in the 1st and 2nd line settings are underway at 240 mg dose. Clinical trial information: NCT03046992.

Purpose As the number of elderly patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) increases, the number of these patients receiving chemotherapy also increases. However, limited data exists regarding the use of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients who are 75 years of age or older. Materials and Methods Between May 2002 and October 2008, data for 48 advanced NSCLC patients who were 75 years of age or older who had been treated with chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Results The median age of study participants at the time of first line chemotherapy was 76 years (range, 75 to 87 years) and their median Charlson comorbidity index was 2 (range, 1 to 4). Of the total 48 patients, 43 patients (90%) were treated by platinum-based doublet as a first line chemotherapy regimen. Median progression free survival for first line chemotherapy was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.93 to 6.47 months) with an overall response rate of 33.3%. After first line chemotherapy, only 14 of the 48 patients (29.2%) received second line chemotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) for these patients was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.44 to 11.96 months). Multivariate analysis results indicated that female gender and having received second-line or more chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for increased OS for all 48 patients. Charlson Index was not a significant independent prognostic factor for survival. There were 9 treatment related deaths due to infectious causes (18.8%). Conclusion Patients 75 years of age or older with advanced NSCLC may obtain clinical benefit from the administration of platinum-based doublet or single agent chemotherapy. However, oncologists must consider the aspect of safety in relation to the clinical benefits when managing this patient group.

Aim: To analyze the chemotherapy regimens and outcomes of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients older than 70 years of age. Methods: Between May 2001 and October 2009, 1135 patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer received palliative chemotherapy. Of these patients 56 (4.9%) were ≥70 years old and were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median age at the time of first-line chemotherapy was 73 years (range, 70–85) and the median Charlson comorbidity index was 0 (0–5). In all 17 patients (30%) received surgery with curative or palliative intent; 43 (77%) were treated by doublet or triplet first-line chemotherapy regimens and 13 patients (23%) received single agent chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival for first-line chemotherapy was 3.97 months (95% CI 2.05–5.89) with an overall response rate of 26%. After the first-line chemotherapy, only 18 of 56 (32%) patients received second-line chemotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.4 months (95% CI 2.81–21.99). In multivariate analysis, receiving surgery and disease control for first-line chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for increased OS for all 56 patients. Conclusion: Patients older ≥70 years with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer might achieve clinical benefit from chemotherapy. Receiving surgery and response of over more stable disease for first-line chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for increased OS.

The role of salvage chemotherapy after first-line therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer has not yet been established. We intended to identify prognostic factors for long-term survival of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with second-line chemotherapy and to devise a prognostic model of clinical parameters.We analysed 90 patients who had received second-line chemotherapy after the failure of first-line therapy in recurrent or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma between August 2003 and December 2008.The median age at the time of second-line chemotherapy was 61.9 years (range 39.8-74.9) and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 1 (0-2). Median progression-free survival and overall survival for second-line chemotherapy were 2.1 and 4.5 months, respectively, with an overall response rate of 10%. In multivariate analysis, an ECOG performance status of 2 or more, non-responder for first-line chemotherapy and albumin level of3.5mg/dl were independent prognostic factors for decreased overall survival for all 90 patients. Overall survival was estimated based on the number of adverse prognostic factors: zero or one (good prognostic group), two (intermediate group) or three (poor prognostic group). The median overall survival for good (n=50), intermediate (n=24) and poor (n=16) prognostic groups was 5.5, 3.3 and 2.1 months, respectively (P0.001).Our result suggests that second-line chemotherapy may be beneficial for overall survival in patients with ECOG performance status 0-1, albumin level ≥3.5mg/dl and response to first-line chemotherapy.

Background: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the immunohistochemical expression of ERCC1 and RASSF1A would predict both response to and survival after docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in inoperable or recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Patients and Methods: A total of 54 patients were treated with frontline systemic chemotherapy composed of docetaxel (60 mg/m2) and cisplatin (65 mg/m2), every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. The expression levels of ERCC1 and RASSF1A were evaluated in the available 36 prechemotherapy samples. Results: The overall objective response rate was 35% (complete remission 12% and partial remission 23%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) times were 5.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.7–6.4 months) and 24.2 months (95% CI, 3.5–45.0 months), respectively. The status of low ERCC1 and high RASSF1A expression was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS in multivariate analysis (p = 0.043; hazard ratio, 7.224; 95% CI, 1.060–49.217). Toxicities were comparable with those of previously reported trials. Conclusions: Less intensive doses of cisplatin and docetaxel are active but not effective in reducing toxicity. Also, both ERCC1 and RASSF1A might be useful prognostic markers in this regimen.

PURPOSE Retinoids (RA), a group of vitamin A derivatives, is known to be important for regulation of normal cellular growth and differentiation. RA treatment of various cancers resulted in cell growth inhibition and apoptosis. Therefore, the chemotherapeutic and chemopreventative activities of various types of tumor have been examined. Biological actions of RA are mediated through nuclear receptors, including the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and retinoid X receptors (RXRs). In this study, we examined the effect of all-trans-retinoic acid (atRA) as an anticancer drug-sensitiser in cancer cell lines and in its drug- resistant cancer cell lines MATERIALS AND METGODS: Cells were maintained by RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were treated with 1 micro M atRA for 48 h, then with the desired concentration of anticancer drug for 24 h. Cell viability was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm using the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] assay. Western blot analyses were performed with the desired antibodies. RESULTS We investigated if pre-treatment with atRA enhanced the drug-sensitivity of various cancer cell lines to either 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, or cisplatin. 5-FU (SNU638-F2) and CDDP-resistant cell (SNU638-Cis) lines, from a Korean gastric cancer cell line (SNU638) and the ADR-resistant cells (AD600) was established from a colon cancer cell line (SW620). Treatment of each cell line, with 1 micro M atRA, prior to drug exposure resulted in enhanced cell death in these cell lines. Furthermore, the effect of atRA on growth inhibition, in each drug-resistant cell line, was more obvious than in their parent cell lines. Increased activity of Transglutaminase II (TgaseII) and cleavage of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) were also observed (western blot analysis. CONCLUSION Based on our data, we suggest that atRA enhances anticancer drug-induced cell death and reverses the drug-sensitivity of the drug-resistant cancer cell lines.

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a Gemcitabine, UFT-E, Leucovorin combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients

PURPOSE Hepatocellular carcinomas are one of the most common malignancies in the world. However, no effective therapeutic modality has been proven to prolong the survival of patients in an inoperable stage. The purpose of this study was to determine the response rate and the toxicities of a combination of pirarubicin, UFT and leucovorin in patients with non-embolizable hepatocellular carcinomas, or who had progressed during their transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Of 23 patients with a hepatocellular carcinoma, 11 had progressed during a transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, with the other 12 being transcatheter arterial chemoembolization-naive. All the patients were treated with pirarubicin (70 mg/m2 i.v., day 1), UFT (350 mg/m2 P.O., day 1~21), and leucovorin (25 mg/m2 P.O., day 1~21). RESULTS Twenty patients were able to be evaluated, with a partial response being achieved in four, giving an overall response rate of 20% (95% confidence interval, 7~44%). The median overall survival time was 6 months, and the median survival time of the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization-naive patients was significantly longer than that of those treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (p=0.012). The most significant dose-limiting toxicity was leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION The combination of pirarubicin, UFT and leucovorin therapies showed marginal antitumor activity and significant toxicity in patients with non-embolizable or failed transcatheter arterial chemoembolization hepatocellular carcinomas.

Purpose The genetic alteration of the janus kinases (JAKs), non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is related to the development of human cancers. However, little is known about how the sequence variation of JAK3 contributes to the development of lung cancer. This study investigated whether polymorphisms at the promoter region of the JAK3 gene are associated with the risk of lung cancer in the Korean population. Materials and methods A total of 819 subjects, including 409 lung cancer patients and 410 healthy controls were recruited. The SNaPshot assay and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis were used, and logistic regression analyses were performed to characterize the association between polymorphisms of JAK3 and lung cancer risk. Results Three polymorphisms (-672 G>A, +64 A>G and +227 G>A) of JAK3 were analyzed for large-scale genotyping (n=819). Statistical analyses revealed that polymorphisms and haplotypes in the JAK3 gene were not significantly associated with lung cancer. Conclusion JAK3 gene was not significantly associated with the risk of lung cancer in the Korean population.

This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and to explore the molecular factors affecting the efficacy of gefitinib. Tumor tissue, derived from either the original tumor or the metastatic or recurrent site was taken from chemo-naïve pts with advanced (stage IIIB, IV, and recurrent) pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Tumor genomic DNA underwent direct sequencing for EGFR exons 18, 19, 20, and 21. Patients with EGFR mutations received 250 mg of gefitinib daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and tolerability. Out of 147 screened patients, 45 pts (31%) had EGFR mutations and received gefitinib. The most common EGFR mutations were in-frame exon 19 deletions (29 pts, 64%) and L858R point mutation in exon 21 (15 pts, 33%). One patient had atypical mutation of L861Q in exon 21. The ORR was 53.3% (95% CI, 38.6-67.9) and disease control rate (DCR) including stable disease was 86.7%. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 398 days and the median overall survival (OS) was 819 days. Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were reported by 6 patients and treatment-related Grade 3 AEs by 3 patients. There were no treatment-related Grade 4 AEs. Exploratory subgroup analysis according to the EGFR mutation subtypes was carried out. The ORR and DCR were higher in patients with exon 19 deletions than those with L858R (62.1% vs 33.3%; P=0.0705 and 96.6% vs 66.7%; P=0.0062, respectively). All 4 patients with progressive disease had a L858R mutation. No secondary resistant mutations such as T790M mutation or insertions in exon 20 were found in those patients. In addition, OS was significantly better in patients with exon 19 deletions than those with L858R (24-month OS rate was 72.1% vs 32.0%, P=0.0148). Gefitinib as the first-line treatment for Korean patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations was effective and well tolerated. Subgroup analysis suggests that the benefit from gefitinib treatment was more prominent in patients with the exon 19 deletion mutations (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00344773).