Search

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the commonest functional gastrointestinal disorder, affecting between 10% and 20% of the adult population worldwide. Recently, IBS research has focused on organic components of causative factors such as gut microbiota that in turn may trigger at mucosal level low-grade inflammation and immune activation. To date, four main lines of reasoning support the role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of IBS: 1) IBS develops in up to 30% of individuals recovering from acute gastroenteritis "post-infective IBS"; 2) small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is characterized by symptoms like IBS; 3) quantitative and qualitative alterations in gut microbiota "dysbiosis "have been reported in subjects with IBS; 4) IBS symptoms can be improved by treatments (antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics) that target the microbiota. These arguments open the way to new therapeutic options to treat patients with IBS by the administration of antibiotics, probiotics and perhaps prebiotics. Antibiotic treatment results in significant improvement rates in IBS symptoms; however, side or systemic effects, drug resistance and cost Limit the chronic use. Many studies report a positive effect of probiotics, however, at present randomized placebo-controlled trials taking into account well-defined and measurable endpoints and a long follow-up should be planned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Assessment of recurrence risk after liver resection (LR) is critical in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly with the advent of effective adjuvant therapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and pathological factors associated with recurrence, aggressive recurrence, and survival after LR., Method: We performed a retrospective study in which all single HCC (BCLC-0/A) patients treated with LR between February 2000 and November 2020 were included. The main clinical variables were recorded. Histological features were blindly evaluated by two independent pathologists. Aggressive recurrence was defined as those that exceeded the Milan criteria at 1 st recurrence., Results: A total of 218 patients were included (30% BCLC 0 and 70% BCLC A), median (IQR) tumor size of 28 (19-42 mm). The prevalence of microvascular invasion and/or satellitosis (mVI/S) was 39%, with a kappa-index between both pathologists of 0.8. After a median follow-up of 49 (23-85) months, 61/218 (28%) patients died, 32/218 (15%) underwent liver transplantation, 127 (58%) developed HCC recurrence. The prevalence of aggressive recurrence was 35% (44/127 Milan-out, with 20 cases at advanced stage), and the 5-year survival rate was 81%. The presence of mVI/S was the only independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% CI 1.28-2.61, p <0.001), aggressive recurrence (HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.74-6.29, p <0.001) and mortality (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.27-3.91, p = 0.005). The macrotrabecular-massive subtype was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of mVI/S, Edmonson Steiner grade III-IV, AFP values and vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters, but not with recurrence, aggressive recurrence, or overall survival., Conclusion: The presence of mVI/S was the only independent risk factor for aggressive recurrence and mortality. This has important implications for early-stage patient management, especially in the setting of adjuvant immunotherapy or ab initio LT., Impact and Implications: Assessment of recurrence risk after liver resection is crucial in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with a high risk of recurrence are candidates for liver transplantation as an ab initio indication or for the potential use of adjuvant therapy. Aggressive recurrences, defined as those exceeding the Milan criteria at first recurrence, have a significant impact on overall survival (OS). Fifty-eight percent of patients experienced hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, with a prevalence of aggressive recurrence at the first occurrence standing at 35%. After a median follow-up of 49 (23-85) months, 61 (28%) patients died, and 32 (15%) underwent liver transplantation, resulting in a 5-year OS rate of 81%. Microvascular invasion and/or satellitosis was present in 39% of our cohort and was the only independent predictor of recurrence, aggressive recurrence, and OS on multivariate analysis. This is important as it could be used to guide therapeutic management., (Copyright © 2024 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Liver transplantation (LT) remains one of the most effective treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and significantly enhances patient survival. However, the application of LT for HCC faces challenges owing to advancements in cancer-specific treatment modalities and the increased burden of patients' comorbidities. This narrative review explores current controversies and advancements in LT for HCC. Key areas of focus include the management of comorbidities and patient education by advanced practice nurses, impacts of frailty on waitlists and post-LT outcomes, selection criteria for LT in the era of new downstaging tools, role of radiology in patient selection, and implications of potential immunotherapy use both before and after LT. Additionally, the importance of immunosuppression management with strategies aimed at minimizing rejection while considering the risk of HCC recurrence and the role of surveillance for HCC recurrence is highlighted. This review also underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for optimizing outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing LT.

Background: For biliary tract cancer (BTC), the addition of immunotherapy (durvalumab or pembrolizumab) to gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) significantly improved overall survival (OS) in phase 3 clinical trials (RCTs). However, the interpretation and magnitude of the treatment effect is challenging because OS Kaplan-Meier curves violate the proportional hazards (PH) assumption. Analysis using restricted mean survival time (RMST) allows quantification of the benefits in the absence of PH. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the benefit of immunotherapy-based regimens for OS at 24 months using RMST analysis., Methods: A systematic review was conducted using studies published up to 8 November 2023. Only phase 3 RCTs evaluating the use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combined with GemCis and reporting OS were included. KM curves for OS were digitized, and the data were reconstructed. A meta-analysis for OS by RMST at 24 months was performed., Results: A total of 1754 participants from the TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials were included. In TOPAZ-1, RMSTs at 24 months were 13.52 (7.92) and 12.21 (7.22) months with GemCis plus durvalumab and GemCis alone, respectively. In KEYNOTE-966, RMSTs at 24 months were 13.60 (7.76) and 12.45 (7.73) months with GemCis plus pembrolizumab and GemCis alone, respectively. Immunotherapy-based regimens showed a mean OS difference at 24 months by an RMST of 1.21 months [(95% CI: 0.49-1.93), p < 0.001, I 2 = 0%]., Conclusions: Immunotherapy-based regimens improve OS in advanced BTC. Given this magnitude of benefit, it is essential to weigh up individual patient factors, preferences, and potential risks. RMST analysis provides valuable information to patients and physicians, facilitating decision-making in a value-based medical environment.

During the last decade, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib and regorafenib have been standard systemic treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous data associated sorafenib with inflammasome activation. However, the role of the inflammasome in sorafenib and regorafenib signaling has not been described in liver cancer patients. For this purpose, we analyzed inflammasome-related transcriptomic changes in a murine HCC model. Our data confirmed inflammasome activation after both TKI treatments, sharing a similar pattern of increased gene expression. According to human database results, transcriptional increase of inflammasome genes is associated with poorer prognosis for male liver cancer patients, suggesting a sex-dependent role for inflammasome activation in HCC therapy. In biopsies of HCC and its surrounding tissue, we detected durable increases in the inflammasome activation pattern after sorafenib or regorafenib treatment in male patients. Further supporting its involvement in sorafenib action, inflammasome inhibition (MCC950) enhanced sorafenib anticancer activity in experimental HCC models, while no direct in vitro effect was observed in HCC cell lines. Moreover, activated human THP-1 macrophages released IL-1β after sorafenib administration, while 3D Hep3B spheres displayed increased tumor growth after IL-1β addition, pointing to the liver microenvironment as a key player in inflammasome action. In summary, our results unveil the inflammasome pathway as an actionable target in sorafenib or regorafenib therapy and associate an inflammasome signature in HCC and surrounding tissue with TKI administration. Therefore, targeting inflammasome activation, principally in male patients, could help to overcome sorafenib or regorafenib resistance and enhance the efficacy of TKI treatments in HCC.

The evolution in systemic therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) signifies a strategy of high-cost, high-gain innovation that originated with sorafenib, despite its limited impact on tumor response. This strategic approach paved the way for the emergence of a second wave of the short-lived competitive advantage, exemplified by the incorporation of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and tremelimumab plus durvalumab. In the context of safety concerns within the liver cancer domain, the IMBRAVE150 and HIMALAYA trials boldly incorporated bevacizumab and tremelimumab, respectively, demonstrating the continuation of the high-risk, high-reward innovation paradigm. This review delves into the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of systemic therapies in the field of HCC., (© 2024 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Background: Ablation is a first-line treatment for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are scarce data about patients' outcomes after recurrence. The present study evaluates the impact of patient and tumor characteristics at baseline and at recurrence on the Clinical Decision-Making process., Methods: We evaluated BCLC-0/A patients treated with percutaneous ablation from January 2010 to November 2018. Clinical and radiological data such as age, tumor location at ablation, pattern of recurrence/progression, and comorbidities during follow-up were registered. Tumor location was divided into 'suboptimal' vs. 'optimal' locations for ablation. The Clinical Decision-Making was based on tumor burden, liver dysfunction, or comorbidities. The statistical analysis included the time-to-recurrence/progression, censoring at time of death, date of last follow-up or liver transplantation, and time-to-event was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models to evaluate the risk of an event of death and change of treatment strategy., Results: A total of 225 patients [39.1% BCLC-0 and 60.9% BCLC-A] were included, 190 had unifocal HCC and 82.6% were ≤3 cm. The complete response rate and median overall survival were 96% and 60.7 months. The HCC nodules number (Hazard Ratio-HR 3.1), Child-Pugh (HR 2.4), and Albumin-Bilirubin score (HR 3.2) were associated with increased risk of death during follow-up. HCC in 'suboptimal location' presented a shorter time to recurrence. When comorbidities prevented further loco-regional or systemic treatment, the risk of death was significantly increased (HR 2.0, p = 0.0369) in comparison to those who received treatment., Conclusions: These results expose the impact of non-liver comorbidities when considering treatment for recurrence after ablation in the real-world setting and in research trials. Ultimately, we identified an orphan population for which effective interventions are needed.

Background and Aims: Immunotherapy-based regimes have changed the management of HCC. However, evidence of efficacy in patients with impaired liver function is unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses survival of HCC patients and liver dysfunction treated with immunotherapy-based regimens., Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of original articles or abstracts reporting survival of HCC patients treated with immunotherapy according to liver function between 2017 and 2022. Overal survival (OS) according to restricted mean survival time (RMST) and median OS, and hazard ratio (HR) of Child-Pugh B or B/C versus Child-Pugh A were assessed while considering the line of treatment., Results: Of the 2218 articles considered, 15 articles recruiting 2311 patients were included. Of these, 639 (27.7%) were Child-Pugh B and 34 (1.5%) C. RMST was 8.36 (95% CI, 6.15-10.57; I2 =93%) months, estimated from 8 studies. The HR was reported in 8 studies for survival between Child-Pugh B versus Child-Pugh A and metanalysis disclosed a 1.65 HR (95% CI,1.45-1.84; I2 =0% heterogeneity; p = 0.45). Treatment line data were available for 47% of the patients and 3 studies included patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab in the first line., Conclusions: The high heterogeneity across studies reflects the incapacity of the current evidence to support the indication of immunotherapy in HCC patients with relevant liver dysfunction. It is mandatory to report complementary information to Child-Pugh classification such as prior liver decompensation, use of concomitant medication to control ascites, or signs of clinically significant portal hypertension to allow better patient stratification in future studies., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: Information about the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with liver cancer is lacking. This study characterizes the outcomes and mortality risk in this population., Methods: Multicentre retrospective, cross-sectional, international study of liver cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection registered between February and December 2020. Clinical data at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and outcomes were registered., Results: Two hundred fifty patients from 38 centres were included, 218 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 32 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). The median age was 66.5 and 64.5 years, and 84.9% and 21.9% had cirrhosis in the HCC and iCCA cohorts respectively. Patients had advanced cancer stage at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in 39.0% of the HCC and 71.9% of the iCCA patients. After a median follow-up of 7.20 (IQR: 1.84-11.24) months, 100 (40%) patients have died, 48% of the deaths were SARS-CoV-2-related. Forty (18.4%) HCC patients died within 30-days. The death rate increase was significantly different according to the BCLC stage (6.10% [95% CI 2.24-12.74], 11.76% [95% CI 4.73-22.30], 20.69% [95% CI 11.35-31.96] and 34.52% [95% CI 17.03-52.78] for BCLC 0/A, B, C and D, respectively; p = .0017). The hazard ratio was 1.45 (95% CI 0.49-4.31; p = .5032) in BCLC-B versus 0/A, and 3.13 (95% CI 1.29-7.62; p = .0118) in BCLC-C versus 0/A in the competing risk Cox regression model. Nineteen out of 32 iCCA (59.4%) died, and 12 deaths were related to SARS-CoV-2 infection., Conclusions: This is the largest cohort of liver cancer patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. It characterizes the 30-day mortality risk of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with HCC during this period., (© 2022 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Dermatologic adverse events (DAEs) are associated with a better outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) irrespective of the therapeutic agent received. The exact mechanisms associated with the development of DAEs are unknown although several studies point to direct toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to the skin or an immune-mediated reaction triggered by the oncologic treatment. As is the case in other conditions, individual genetic variants may partially explain a higher risk of DAEs., Aim: To evaluate the contribution of several gene variants to the risk of developing DAEs in HCC patients treated with TKIs., Methods: We first analyzed 27 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 12 genes selected as potential predictors of adverse event (AE) development in HCC patients treated with sorafenib [Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 1 (BCLC1) cohort]. Three additional cohorts were analyzed for AGT1 (rs699) and AGT2 (rs4762) polymorphisms-initially identified as predictors of DAEs: BCLC2 ( n = 79), Northern Italy ( n = 221) and Naples ( n = 69) cohorts, respectively. The relation between SNPs and DAEs and death were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, and presented with hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)., Results: The BCLC1 cohort showed that patients with arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR = 1.61; P value = 0.007) and/or AGT SNPs had an increased risk of DAEs. Thereafter, AGT2 (rs4762) AA genotype was found to be linked to a statistically significant increased probability of DAEs (HR = 5.97; P value = 0.0201, AA vs GG) in the Northern Italy cohort by multivariate analysis adjusted for BCLC stage, ECOG-PS, diabetes and AHT. The value of this genetic marker was externally validated in the cohort combining the BCLC1, BCLC2 and Naples cohorts [HR = 3.12 (95%CI: 1.2-8.14), P value = 0.0199, AGT2 (rs4762) AA vs AG genotype and HR = 2.73 (95%CI: 1.18-6.32) P value = 0.0188, AGT2 (rs4762) AA vs GG genotype]. None of the other gene variants tested were found to be associated with the risk of DAE development., Conclusion: DAE development in HCC patients receiving TKIs could be explained by the AGT2 (rs4762) gene variant. If validated in other anti-oncogenic treatments, it might be considered a good prognosis marker., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Víctor Sapena: Travel grants from Bayer; Massimo Iavarone: Bayer, Gilead Sciences, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, BTG-Boston Scientific, AbbVie, Guerbet, EISAI, Shionogi; Loreto Boix: Speaker fees from Bayer; Marco Sanduzzi Zamparelli: Speaker fees and travel funding from Bayer; Travel grant from BTG, Eisai and MSD; Mario Scartozzi: Speakers Bureau and Advisory board Bayer, EISAI, MSD, AMGEN, Merck, Sanofi; Alba Díaz: Speaker fees from Bayer; Andrea Casadei-Gardini: Speakers Bureau and Advisory board Bayer, EISAI, MSD, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, GSK; Pietro Lampertico: Speaking bureau/advisor for Abbvie, Eiger, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck/ Merck Sharp & Dohme, MYR Pharma, Roche; Ferran Torres: DSMB fees from Basilea Pharmaceutica International and ROVI; educational fees from Janssen and Ferrer; Jordi Bruix: Consultancy fees from Arqule, Bayer, Novartis, BMS, BTG-Biocompatibles, Eisai, Kowa, Terumo, Gilead, Bio-Alliance/Onxeo, Roche, AbbVie, Merck, Sirtex, Ipsen, Astra-Medimmune, Incyte, Quirem, Adaptimmune, Lilly, Basilea, Nerviano; Research grants from Bayer and BTG; Educational grants from Bayer and BTG; Lecture fees from Bayer, BTG-Biocompatibles, Eisai, Terumo, Sirtex, Ipsen; María Reig: Consultancy fees from Bayer, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, UniversalDX and Lilly; Lecture fees from Bayer, BMS, Gilead, Lilly and Roche; Research grants (to the institution) from Bayer, Roche and Ipsen; and the rest of the authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Polyethylene glycol drug-eluting microspheres (PEG-DEMs) can be loaded to elute doxorubicin. The current study evaluated the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of PEG-DEMs in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Materials and Methods: The current prospective, multicenter, dose-escalation study enrolled 25 patients (68% men) with early or intermediate stage HCC and a performance status of 0. Patients in Cohort I were assigned to receive target doxorubicin doses of 75, 100, or 150 mg. Analyses were performed on the basis of the specific dose of doxorubicin that the patients received because some patients received less than the assigned dose. Patients in Cohort II received the maximum safe tested dose. Adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. The tumor response was evaluated every 3 months according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors., Results: The maximum tested safe dose of doxorubicin was 150 mg. For the groups that received ≤75, 75-100, and 101-150 mg of doxorubicin, the peak plasma concentrations were 286.7 ng/mL ± 220.1, 157.1 ng/mL ± 94.6, and 245.4 ng/mL ± 142.8, respectively; the areas under the curves calculated from 0 to 24 h were 421.7 (ng × h)/mL ± 221.2, 288.1 (ng × h)/mL ± 100.9, and 608.3 (ng × h)/mL ± 319.3, respectively, with almost complete clearance at 24 h. There was no death within 30 d. The best objective response rate was 81%, and the disease control rate was 91%. The median overall survival was 27.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.5 months to not evaluated [n.e.]); the median progression-free survival was 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.5 months to n.e.)., Conclusions: PEG-DEMs demonstrated a favorable safety profile with low systemic concentration of doxorubicin, and promising efficacy., (Copyright © 2022 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Recognition of non-characterized liver nodules (NCLN) prior to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) is associated with increased hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in patients with HCV. The risk of HCC has not been defined in F3/F4 patients in whom NCLN have been ruled-out before starting DAAs and at sustained virological response (SVR). This study aimed to estimate HCC incidence in this population., Methods: We performed a prospective study including HCV-infected patients with F3/F4 fibrosis, without a history of HCC, and who achieved SVR after DAAs. Patients were only included if they had undergone ultrasound imaging that excluded the presence of HCC/NCLN within 30 days after SVR. All patients were evaluated every 6 months until developing primary liver cancer, death or withdrawal of informed consent. HCC incidence was expressed per 100 patient-years (/100PY). Adherence to screening program was calculated every 6 months for the first 48 months., Results: A total of 185 patients (63/122, F3/F4) were included. Among those with cirrhosis, 92% were Child-Pugh A and 42.7% had clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Albumin-bilirubin score was 1 in 84.9% and 2 in 15.1% of patients, respectively. The median clinical and radiologic follow-up was 52.4 months and 48 months, respectively. Ten patients developed HCC: HCC incidence was 1.46/100PY (95% CI 0.79-2.71) in the whole cohort, 2.24/100PY (95% CI 1.21-4.17) in F4 only and 3.63/100PY (95% CI 1.95-6.74) in patients with CSPH. No HCC was registered in patients with F3. Median time between SVR and HCC occurrence was 28.1 months; 12 non-primary liver cancers were also identified., Conclusions: Patients with cirrhosis without NCLN at SVR remain at risk of HCC development. The absence of HCC in patients with F3 reinforces their marginal cancer risk, but prospective studies are needed to exclude them from screening programs., Lay Summary: Patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, without non-characterized liver nodules at sustained virologic response, remain at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma despite viral cure. However, the cancer risk after successful direct-acting antiviral treatment is marginal in patients with F3 fibrosis without non-characterized liver nodules. If confirmed in larger prospective studies, current screening recommendations may need to be revisited in this group of patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest MSZ: received speaker fees from Bayer and travel grants from Bayer, BTG and Eisai; ZM: received consultancy fees from Gilead, Abbvie, Alexion, Orphalan and Deep Genomics; speaker fees from Gilead and Abbvie and research grants from Gilead; SL: received consultancy and speaker fees from Gilead and Abbvie and grants from Gilead, VS: received travel grants from Bayer; GI: received ravel grants from Bayer; NG: congress inscriptions: Eisai; NLL: Bayer, AstraZeneca, Travel funding: Bayer Congress inscriptions: Eisai; AD: speaker fees and travel grants from Bayer; AGC: Speaker fees from BTG and Terumo; AD: speaker fees from Bayer and travel grants from Bayer; SMM: received speaker fees from Bayer and travel grants from Bayer and Eisai; CA: Speaker fees, travel and research grants from Bayer, BTG and Terumo. Consultancy from ROCHE; JR: has consulted for Roche and received speaker fees from Bayer and Roche and travel grants from Bayer; AF: Lecture fees from Bayer, Gilead and MSD; consultancy fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Roche and Guerbert; FT: DSMB fees from Archivel Farma, S.L., Daiichi-Sankyo Pharma Development, ArQule and Rovi; speaker fees from Bayer; lecture fees from Janssen; JB: has consulted for Arqule, Bayer-Shering Pharma, Novartis, BMS, BTG- Biocompatibles, Eisai, Kowa, Terumo, Gilead, Bio-Alliance, Roche, AbbVie, MSD, Sirtex, Ipsen, Astra-Medimmune, Incyte, Quirem, Adaptimmune, Lilly, Basilea, Nerviano, Sanofi; and received research/educational grants from Bayer, and lecture fees from Bayer-Shering Pharma, BTG-Biocompatibles, Eisai, Terumo, Sirtex, Ipsen; XF: acted as advisor for Gilead and Abbvie; MR: received consultancy fees and/or travel support from Bayer, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, UniversalDX, Boston Scientific and Lilly, lecture fees from Bayer, BMS, Gilead, and Lilly and research grants from Bayer and Ipsen. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction and Aims: HCV eradication by direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) improves liver outcomes and reduces overall liver mortality. However, patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) may experience a progression of liver disease despite viral clearance. Silybin has shown hepatoprotective effects in experimental models, but clinical data are limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a highly bioavailable form of silybin on liver fibrosis in patients with HCV-related ACLD after viral eradication with DAAs, in comparison with the standard of care. Methods: In this multicenter and prospective study, HCV patients with ACLD achieving SVR12 were treated with the combination of silybinphospholipid complex with vitamin D and vitamin E (Realsil 100D ® , Ibi Lorenzini S.p.A., Aprilia, Italy) for 12 months (R group) compared to controls (C group). Patients were submitted to transient elastography (TE) and to the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test at baseline, week 24, and week 48. Results: One hundred sixteen patients were enrolled, 56 in the R group and 60 in the C group. The median age was 68 years, and 53% were male, with no differences between groups. In both groups, liver stiffness improved at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. However, patients in the R group compared to those in the C group showed a higher reduction of liver stiffness after 6 months (-2.05, 95% CI -3.89 to -0.22, p < 0.05) and 12 months of treatment (-2.79, 95% CI -4.5 to -1.09, p < 0.01) in comparison with baseline. No significant difference in the reduction of ELF was observed between the two groups. During the follow-up, four patients developed HCC, all in the C group. Conclusions: In HCV-related ACLD, the hepatoprotective effects of silybin may represent a tool to counteract liver disease progression., Competing Interests: MS-Z Travel grant from Bayer and Eisai; lecture fees form Bayer and BTG. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer RV declared a past co-authorship with the authors MSZ, CS, MG, MD, AF to the handling editor., (Copyright © 2022 Cossiga, Sanduzzi-Zamparelli, Sapena, Guarino, Dallio, Torrisi, Pignata, Federico, Salomone and Morisco.)

Background & Aims: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may be a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the extent of this association still needs to be addressed. Pooled incidence rates of HCC across the disease spectrum of NAFLD have never been estimated by meta-analysis., Methods: In this systematic review, we searched Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 1950 through July 30, 2020. We included studies reporting on HCC incidence in patients with NAFLD. The main outcomes were pooled HCC incidences in patients with NAFLD at distinct severity stages. Summary estimates were calculated with random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression analyses were carried out to address heterogeneity., Results: We included 18 studies involving 470,404 patients. In patients with NAFLD at a stage earlier than cirrhosis, the incidence rate of HCC was 0.03 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.07; I 2  = 98%). In patients with cirrhosis, the incidence rate was 3.78 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 2.47-5.78; I 2  = 93%). Patients with cirrhosis undergoing regular screening for HCC had an incidence rate of 4.62 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 2.77-7.72; I 2  = 77%)., Conclusions: Patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis have a risk of developing HCC similar to that reported for patients with cirrhosis from other etiologies. Evidence documenting the risk in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or simple steatosis is limited, but the incidence of HCC in these populations may lie below thresholds used to recommend a screening. Well-designed prospective studies in these subpopulations are needed. The protocol for this systematic review is registered in the Prospero database (registration number CRD42018092861)., (Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: MR reports a consultancy from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Ipsen, Astra Zeneca, Boston Science, Lilly, and UniversalDX; lecture fees from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Lilly, and ROCHE; travel support from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, and AstraZeneca; and research funding (paid to the institution) from Bayer and Ipsen. MR also received grant support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI15/00145 and PI18/0358) and the Spanish Health Ministry (National Strategic Plan against Hepatitis C). MS-Z received speaker fees from Bayer and travel grants from Bayer, BTG, and Eisai-Merck Sharpe and Dohme; was supported by Ajuts per a la iniciació a la recerca 2019 from Societat Catalana de Digestologia (SCD); and received grant support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FI19/00222). Both authors are members of the European Reference Network (ERN) RARE-LIVER.

Safety of regorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has been recently demonstrated. We aimed to assess the survival benefit of regorafenib compared with best supportive care (BSC) in LT patients after sorafenib discontinuation. This observational multicenter retrospective study included LT patients with HCC recurrence who discontinued first-line sorafenib. Group 1 comprised regorafenib-treated patients, whereas the control group was selected among patients treated with BSC due to unavailability of second-line options at the time of sorafenib discontinuation and who were sorafenib-tolerant progressors (group 2). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of group 1 compared with group 2. Secondary endpoints were safety and OS of sequential treatment with sorafenib + regorafenib/BSC. Among 132 LT patients who discontinued sorafenib included in the study, 81 were sorafenib tolerant: 36 received regorafenib (group 1) and 45 (group 2) received BSC. Overall, 24 (67%) patients died in group 1 and 40 (89%) in group 2: the median OS was significantly longer in group 1 than in group 2 (13.1 versus 5.5 months; P < 0.01). Regorafenib treatment was an independent predictor of reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.89; P = 0.02). Median treatment duration with regorafenib was 7.0 (95% CI, 5.5-8.5) months; regorafenib dose was reduced in 22 (61%) patients for adverse events and discontinued for tumor progression in 93% (n = 28). The median OS calculated from sorafenib start was 28.8 months (95% CI, 17.6-40.1) in group 1 versus 15.3 months (95% CI, 8.8-21.7) in group 2 (P < 0.01). Regorafenib is an effective second-line treatment after sorafenib in patients with HCC recurrence after LT., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

The landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed since the incorporation of sorafenib in 2007 as the first pharmacological treatment for HCC. The combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is currently the first-line treatment for HCC patients, and there are several second-line options approved for patients who had received sorafenib as the first-line treatment. The advantage of having multiple options of pharmacological treatment for HCC patients is associated to the need to redefine the clinical decision-making approach and considering new endpoints for the clinical trials design. The aim of this review was to share the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer approach and to summarize the ongoing clinical trials, which are testing pharmacological treatments., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement S.M-M. received speaker fees from Bayer and travel funding from Bayer and Eisai. G.I. received travel funding fees from Bayer. M.S.Z. received speaker fees and travel grants from Bayer and travel grants from BTG, Eisai. N.L.L. received consultancy fees from Bayer and AstraZeneca travel funding from Bayer and Congress inscriptions: Eisai. M.R. holds consultant role at Bayer-Schering Pharma, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and BTG; attended paid conferences at Bayer-Schering Pharma, BMS, Gilead, and Lilly; and received Institutional research grants from Bayer-Schering Pharma and Ipsen., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite atezolizumab and bevacizumab (A + B) is currently the first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, some patients will not be adequate for this combination. In the setting of sorafenib some adverse events have been proposed as prognostic factors., Objective: To characterize the early diarrhoea development as prognostic factor in 344 HCC patients., Methods: The development of early diarrhoea in sorafenib treatment defined as patients who developed diarrhoea and needed dose modification within the first 60 days of treatment (e-diarrhoea) and 3-grouping variables were analysed: Patients with e-diarrhoea, patients who developed diarrhoea after the first 60 days of treatment (L-diarrhoea) and patients that never developed diarrhoea (never diarrhoea)., Results: The median overall survival in sorafenib treated patients was significantly different across groups (6.8 months for e-diarrhoea, 26.7 months for L-diarrhoea and 13.3 months for never-diarrhoea). The emergence of e-diarrhoea was associated with poor outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84 [95%CI 1.15-2.95]), while there was no increased/decreased risk of dismal evolution in patients with L-diarrhoea (HR 0.66 [95%CI 0.42-1.03])., Conclusion: The emergence of e-diarrhoea in HCC patients treated with sorafenib is an early predictor of dismal evolution under this therapy. Thus, prompt identification of these non-responders may be useful for an early switch to second-line therapies., (© 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Background & Aims: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems and it may have heavily impacted patients with liver cancer (LC). Herein, we evaluated whether the schedule of LC screening or procedures has been interrupted or delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: An international survey evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practice and clinical trials from March 2020 to June 2020, as the first phase of a multicentre, international, and observational project. The focus was on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, cared for around the world during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave., Results: Ninety-one centres expressed interest to participate and 76 were included in the analysis, from Europe, South America, North America, Asia, and Africa (73.7%, 17.1%, 5.3%, 2.6%, and 1.3% per continent, respectively). Eighty-seven percent of the centres modified their clinical practice: 40.8% the diagnostic procedures, 80.9% the screening programme, 50% cancelled curative and/or palliative treatments for LC, and 41.7% modified the liver transplantation programme. Forty-five out of 69 (65.2%) centres in which clinical trials were running modified their treatments in that setting, but 58.1% were able to recruit new patients. The phone call service was modified in 51.4% of centres which had this service before the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 19/37)., Conclusions: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a tremendous impact on the routine care of patients with liver cancer. Modifications in screening, diagnostic, and treatment algorithms may have significantly impaired the outcome of patients. Ongoing data collection and future analyses will report the benefits and disadvantages of the strategies implemented, aiding future decision-making., Lay Summary: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems globally. Herein, we assessed the impact of the first wave pandemic on patients with liver cancer and found that routine care for these patients has been majorly disrupted, which could have a significant impact on outcomes., Competing Interests: SM.-M.: Speaker fees from Bayer and travel funding from 10.13039/100004326Bayer and 10.13039/501100014382Eisai. V.S.: Travel grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer. A.F.: Lecture fees from Bayer, Gilead and MSD; consultancy fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Roche and Guerbert. J-C.N.: Received research grant from 10.13039/100004326Bayer for Inserm UMR1138. L.R.: Reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi; lectures fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Roche, Sanofi; travel fees from Ipsen; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca, BeiGene, 10.13039/501100003769Eisai, 10.13039/100010544Exelixis, 10.13039/100006591Fibrogen, Incyte, 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen, 10.13039/100004312Lilly, 10.13039/100007054MSD, 10.13039/100004337Roche. B.S.: Reports consultancy fees from Adaptimmune, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, BTG, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Sirtex Medical, Terumo; and research grants from 10.13039/100002491BMS and Sirtex Medical. J. Bruix: Consultancy: AbbVie, ArQule, Astra, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Kowa, Lilly, Medimune, Novartis, Onxeo, Polaris, Quirem, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Sirtex, Terumo/Grants: 10.13039/100004326Bayer and 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen. M.S.Z.: Received speaker fees and travel grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer and 10.13039/100014869BTG, 10.13039/100007054MSD. M.B.: Consultant and Advisory Board for: Bayer Pharma, Ipsen, BMS, Eisai, Roche, AstraZeneca, Sirtex Medical. D.J.P.: Received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare and Bayer Healthcare and travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, EISAI, Roche, and AstraZeneca; received research funding (to institution) from MSD and BMS. T.M.: Consultancy: Eisai, Roche, BTG, Ipsen, Bayer, Adaptimmune. Research funding: Bayer, BTG. H.W.: Served as speaker for Bayer, Eisai, and Ipsen, and as a consultant for Bayer, Eisai, Lilly, BMS, Roche, and Ipsen. B.M.: Consultancy: Bayer-Shering Pharma /Speaker fees: Eisai, MSDG. C. Consultancy fees from Bayer, Ipsen. P.R.G.: Bayer, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Adaptimmune, Sirtex, Lilly Ipsen, Roche, Eisai. M.R.A.S.: Has received Research grants, advisory board or speaker fees for 10.13039/100006483AbbVie, 10.13039/100004326Bayer, Biolab, Intercept, 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen, 10.13039/100008799Gilead, 10.13039/100009947MSD, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, and 10.13039/100004337Roche. J.T.: Has received research grants from 10.13039/100004337Roche and 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen. He has received speaker and consulting honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer Healthcare, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dome, Lilly Imclone, and Roche. J. Bridgewater: Consultancy Bayer, BMS, Incyte, Taiho, Roche, MSD and Merck Serono. Research funding from Incyte. G.C.: Consultancy fees from Bayer, Ipsen. A.L.: Consultancy CAScination, Advisory Board Neuwave and Histosonics. H.T.: Speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, and Bayer. R.V.: Research grant from 10.13039/100006483Abbvie. A.M.M.P.: Speaker honorarium from Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific and EISAI. Consulting honorarium from Bayer, AstraZeneca and EISAI. Advisory honorarium from Bayer, AstraZeneca and EISAI. Grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer and 10.13039/100008497Boston Scientific. M.D.: Has received consulting and training fees from Bayer and Eisai. B.B.: Reports Consultancy for GenMab (paid to Institution); Advisory Boards for Roche (paid to Institution), Eisai Europe Limited (paid to Institution), research grant from 10.13039/100006436Celgene Ltd (paid to Institution), Speakers Bureau for Eisai Europe Limited (paid to Institution), Travel and registration for Congress from Bayer. L.d.F.: Lectures fees from BMS, Roche and Bayer. B.M.M.: Advisory/Speaker: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck, Roche, Sanoffi Genzyme, Taiho. Expert Testimony: Eisai, Roche. Travel: Eisai, Merck. Research: Sillajen (Individual); AstraZeneca, H3/Eisai, Galera, GSK, Exelixis (Institution). M.S.: Travel/ accommodation/meeting expenses: Bayer. Eisai. Speaker fees: Bayer. C.R.L.: Travel grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer. M.R-G.: Reports grants from Intercept, grants from 10.13039/100005564Gilead-Sciences, personal fees from Shionogi, personal fees from Alfa-Wasserman, personal fees from Prosciento, personal fees from Kaleido, personal fees from Novonrdisk, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Allergan, personal fees from Boehriger-Ingelheim, personal fees from Zydus, personal fees from Intercept Pharma, personal fees from Gilead-Sciences, outside the submitted work. F.P.: Disclosures: Received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Roche, LKM-Biotoscana, RAFFO. Research Grants from INC Argentinean 10.13039/100013137National Institute of Corrections, 10.13039/100004337Roche. V.M.: Lectures sponsored by Bayer. G.B.: Advisory board Eli-Lilly and Incyte. M. Vergara: Travel grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer, 10.13039/100008799Gilead, 10.13039/100009947MSD and 10.13039/100006483Abbvie. Lectures sponsored by Gilead, Abbvie, Intercept, and MSD. M.L.: Lectures and educational presentations: Abbvie. Travel/accommodation, meeting expenses covered by Bayer, Gilead, Abbvie. M.I.: Received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Gilead Sciences, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, BTG-Boston Scientific, AbbVie, EISAI, and was consultant for BTG-Boston Scientific, Bayer, and Guerbet. M.R.: Consultancy: Bayer-Schering Pharma, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BTG/Paid conferences: Bayer-Schering Pharma, BMS, Gilead, Lilly/Research Grants: 10.13039/100004326Bayer-Schering Pharma, 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Background/aim: Dermatological adverse events (DAE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with sorafenib predicts better outcome. Some turn into skin lesions (SL) requiring pathology examination. We describe incidence, characteristics and molecular profile of SL in HCC patients treated with sorafenib., Materials and Methods: SL were prospectively collected in 311 HCC patients who started sorafenib. SL from sorafenib cohort were compared to those from a control patient group selected to match SL type and demographics. HRAS , KRAS and BRAF mutations were analyzed by CAST-PCR, mutated p53 and MAPK pathway activation by immunohistochemistry and immune infiltration by hematoxylin-eosin staining., Results: Eighty-eight out of 311 patients developed DAE and 7.4% SL required histological assessment. Most frequent lesions were keratoacanthomas ( n = 4), squamous-cell carcinomas (SCC)( n = 5), basal-cell carcinomas (BCC)( n = 3) and seborrheic keratosis ( n = 5). HRAS and KRAS mutations were detected in 4 SL, while no mutations showed in control SL. Nuclear pERK immunostaining was identified in 33.3% of cases versus 5.3% of controls. Most SL (90%) from patients with DAE were proliferative with intense immune infiltration (73%)., Conclusions: The onset of SL and their molecular profile did not impact negatively on patient's prognosis, but intense proliferation of SL may reflect compensatory activation of MAPK pathway and warrants their close monitoring., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Leonardo G. da Fonseca: None. -Carla Fuster-Anglada: None. -Cristina Carrera: None. Cristina Millán: None. - Esther Samper: None. Víctor Sapena: Travel funding from Bayer. Álvaro Díaz-González: Speaker fees and travel funding from Bayer. Travel funding from BTG and GILEAD. Marco Sanduzzi-Zamparelli: Speaker fees and travel funding from Bayer. Travel grant from BTG. Alejandro Forner: Consultancy fees from Bayer, Guerbert, AstraZeneca. Speaker fees from Bayer, MSD-Eisai and Gilead. Jordi Bruix: Consultancy fees from Arqule, Bayer, Novartis, BMS, BTGBiocompatibles, Eisai, Kowa, Terumo, Gilead, Bio-Alliance/Onxeo, Roche, AbbVie, Merck, Sirtex, Ipsen, Astra-Medimmune, Incyte, Quirem, Adaptimmune, Lilly, Basilea, Nerviano. Research grants from Bayer and BTG. Educational grants from Bayer and BTG. Lecture fees from Bayer, BTG- Biocompatibles, Eisai, Terumo, Sirtex, Ipsen. María Reig: Consultancy fees from Bayer, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca and Lilly. Lecture fees from Bayer, BMS, Gilead, and Lilly. Research grants from Bayer and Ipsen. Loreto Boix: None. Alba Díaz: None., (Copyright: © 2021 da Fonseca et al.)

Goals: To describe the occurrence of malabsorption (MA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients under sorafenib, the potential relationship with pancreatic insufficiency (PI), and the role of pancreatic enzymes supplementation., Background: With the increasing options of second-line systemic therapies for HCC, the recognition of drug intolerance using practical tools is crucial. It has been proposed that a MA syndrome could be due to sorafenib-induced pancreatic dysfunction., Study: All sorafenib-treated patients with suspicion of MA (defined as decreased stool consistency lasting >4 wk or presenting ≥10% body weight loss without HCC progression) were prospectively evaluated by serum markers, endoscopy, and imaging techniques., Results: We evaluated 81 sorafenib-treated patients and 21 developed MA suspicion (85.7% male, 81.5% Child-Pugh A, 52.4% BCLC-B, and 47.6% BCLC-C) within a median 5.9 months after starting sorafenib. The median treatment duration, follow-up, and overall survival after MA suspicion were 5.9, 20.3, and 20.3 months, respectively. Nine of them (42.9%) presented hyperparathyroidism secondary to vitamin D deficiency and 8 with PI. A gradual decrease in pancreatic volume of up to 19% was observed among patients with PI. Six of the 8 patients with PI received pancreatic enzymes, with complete recovery from MA symptoms and stabilization of pancreatic volume., Conclusions: We validated the association between MA and PI in 10% of sorafenib-treated patients. Pancreatic enzymes supplementation successfully led to symptomatic recovery. Awareness of this adverse event can help in the management of sorafenib irrespective of cancer type and likely, of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors for HCC patients., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib who develop early dermatologic adverse events (eDAEs) have a better prognosis. This may be linked to immune mechanisms, and thus, it is relevant to assess the association between peripheral immunity and the probability of developing eDAEs. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 52 HCC patients treated with sorafenib were analyzed at baseline and throughout the first eight weeks of therapy. T, B, Natural Killer cells, and their immune checkpoints expression data were characterized by flow cytometry. Cytokine release and immune-suppression assays were carried out ex vivo. Cox baseline and time-dependent regression models were applied to evaluate the probability of increased risk of eDAEs. DNAM-1, PD-1, CD69, and LAG-3 in T cells, plus CD16 and LAG-3 in NK cells, are significantly associated with the probability of developing eDAEs. While NK DNAM-1 + cells express activation markers, T DNAM-1 + cells induce immune suppression and show immune exhaustion. This is the first study to report an association between immune checkpoints expression in circulating immune cells and the increased incidence of eDAEs. Our results support the hypothesis for an off-target role of sorafenib in immune modulation. We also describe a novel association between DNAM-1 and immune exhaustion in T cells.

Background & Aims: Sorafenib and lenvatinib are the first-line treatments approved in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but information is lacking about the relationships between their pharmacokinetics, patients pharmacogenetic profiles, adverse events (AE) and overall survival. We aimed to elucidate these relationships of tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, such as sorafenib, in order to improve the design of trials testing it in combination with checkpoint inhibitors., Methods: We assessed the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib and its N-oxide metabolite at day-0, day-7, day-30, day-60, day-90, day-120, day-150 and day-180 and nine single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in five genes related to sorafenib metabolism/transport to identify the best point for starting the combination between tyrosine kinases and checkpoint inhibitors., Results: We prospectively included 49 patients (96% cirrhotic, 37% hepatitis-C, 82% Child-Pugh-A and 59% BCLC-C). Pharmacokinetic values peaked at day-7 and progressively declined until day-60. In the 16 patients without further dose modifications after day-60, pharmacokinetic values remained stable through day-180 (sorafenib P = .90; N-oxide P = .93). Pharmacokinetic values were higher in patients with early dermatological adverse events and lower in patients with early diarrhoea. Sorafenib and N-oxide pharmacokinetic values varied linearly with different alleles of MRP2*3972., Conclusions: Sorafenib's pharmacokinetics is heterogeneous across HCC patients. This heterogeneity affects adverse events development and must be taken into account in setting the dose and timing of its combination with checkpoint inhibitors., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background and Aims: Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is an ultra-rare hepatic vascular tumor, diagnosed more frequently in females. The knowledge about this tumor derives mainly from small case series with sub-optimal treatment outcomes. The aim of this study is to identify the clinical and radiological issues helpful to develop an international prospective registry., Methods: We conducted an international multicentric and retrospective study of patients with hepatic hemangioendothelioma. The clinical, pathological and radiological images collected during follow-up were reviewed. Central radiological revision was performed and 3 patterns of contrast were defined., Results: Between 1994 and 2016, 27 patients with hepatic hemangioendothelioma were identified in three institutions but the final diagnosis was hepatic angiosarcoma in one. The majority were females, median age was 38.7-years and 17 patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis. No patient had Two out of ten (20%) patients had surgical specimens with positive macro-vascular invasion and 50% had extrahepatic disease, and the most frequent pattern was the progressive-central-contrast-uptake. After a median follow-up of 6.7-years, the 5- and 10-year survival rates are 91.5% and 51.9%, respectively., Conclusions: This multicentric study shows the heterogeneous profile of patients with hepatic hemangioendothelioma, reflecting the need to establish a reference network in order to better characterize these patients and ultimately develop a personalized treatment strategy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Information on safety and efficacy of systemic treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) under dialysis are limited due to patient exclusion from clinical trials. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the rate, prevalence, tolerability, and outcome of sorafenib in this population., Methods: We report a multicenter study comprising patients from Latin America and Europe. Patients treated with sorafenib were enrolled; demographics, dose modifications, adverse events (AEs), treatment duration, and outcome of patients undergoing dialysis were recorded., Results: As of March 2018, 6156 HCC patients were treated in 44 centres and 22 patients were concomitantly under dialysis (0.36%). The median age was 65.5 years, 40.9% had hepatitis C, 75% had Child-Pugh A, and 85% were Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-C. The median time to first dose modification, treatment duration and overall survival rate were 2.4 months (interquartile ranges [IQR], 0.8-3.8), 10.8 months (IQR, 4.5-16.9), and 17.5 months (95% CI, 7.2-24.5), respectively. Seventeen patients required at least 1 dose modification. The main causes of first dose modification were asthenia/worsening of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status and diarrhoea. At the time of death or last follow-up, four patients were still on treatment and 18 had discontinued sorafenib: 14 were due to tumour progression, 2 were sorafenib-related, and 2 were non-sorafenib-related AE., Conclusions: The outcomes observed in this cohort seem comparable to those in the non-dialysis population. Thus, to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest and most informative dataset regarding systemic treatment outcomes in HCC patients undergoing dialysis., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)