Search

Sup Data Table S1: Characteristic features of long responder patients Sup Data Figure S1: a: PFS and OS from the first objective response assessed for responder patients; b: PFS and OS from the first objective response assessed for partial responders; c: OS and PFS from the first complete response assessed (crPFS and crOS) Sup Data Figure S2: Risk of relapse upon therapy discontinuation function of therapy duration Sup Data Figure S3: Survival from relapse and PFS from OR of secondary refractory disease Sup Data Figure S4: PFS from OR of secondary refractory disease function of tumor type Sup Data Table S2: Characteristics of secondary refractory disease Sup Data Table S3: Characteristics of long survival after immunotherapy initiation with progression first response/stable disease then progression: n=30 (%) Sup Data Table S4: Objective response rate (ORR) as a function of tumor type (%) Sup Data Figure S5a: PFS function of RMH score Sup Data Figure S5b: OS function of the RMH score Sup Data Figure 6: a: Overall survival function of NLR, b: Overall survival for patients presenting progressive disease as best response function of the NLR, c: Overall survival for patients presenting stable disease as best response function of the NLR d: Overall survival for patients presenting objective response as best response function of the NLR Sup Data Figure S7: a: Response function of neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, b: comparison of lymphocyte count function of response, c: comparison of neutrophil count function of response

Purpose:Anti–PD-(L)1 can provide overall survival (OS) benefits over conventional treatments for patients with many different cancer types. However, the long-term outcome of cancer patients responding to these therapies remains unknown. This study is an exploratory study that aimed to describe the long-term survival of patients responding to anti–PD-(L)1 monotherapy across multiple cancer types.Patients and Methods: Data from patients treated with an anti–PD-(L)1 monotherapy in a phase I trial at Gustave Roussy were retrospectively analyzed over a period of 5 years. All cancer types (n = 19) were included. Clinical and biological factors associated with response, long-term survival, and secondary refractory disease were studied.Results:Among 262 eligible patients, the overall objective response rate was 29%. The median progression-free survival of responder patients (RP) at 3 months was 30 months, and the median OS of RP was not reached after a median follow-up of 34 months. In RPs, 3- and 5-year OS percentages were 84% and 64%, respectively. No death occurred in the 21 complete responders (CR) during the overall follow-up. However, many partial responders (PR) showed subsequent tumor relapses to treatment. Long responders (response ≥2 years) represented 11.8% of the overall population. These findings should be validated in further prospective studies.Conclusions:There are currently no differences in therapeutic strategies between CRs and PRs to anti–PD-(L)1. We found a striking difference in OS between these two types of responses. Our results are in favor of evaluating patient stratification strategies and intensification of treatments when tumor lesions of a partial responder to immunotherapy stop improving.See related commentary by Cohen and Flaherty, p. 910

A phase II study (PRIMMO) of patients with pretreated persistent/recurrent/metastatic cervical or endometrial cancer is presented. Patients received an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail (IDC) consisting of low-dose cyclophosphamide, aspirin, lansoprazole, vitamin D, and curcumin starting 2 weeks before radioimmunotherapy. Pembrolizumab was administered three-weekly from day 15 onwards; one of the tumor lesions was irradiated (8Gyx3) on days 15, 17, and 19. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate per immune-related response criteria (irORR) at week 26 (a lower bound of the 90% confidence interval [CI] of > 10% was considered efficacious). The prespecified 43 patients (cervical, n = 18; endometrial, n = 25) were enrolled. The irORR was 11.1% (90% CI 2.0–31.0) in cervical cancer and 12.0% (90% CI 3.4–28.2) in endometrial cancer. Median duration of response was not reached in both cohorts. Median interval-censored progression-free survival was 4.1 weeks (95% CI 4.1–25.7) in cervical cancer and 3.6 weeks (95% CI 3.6–15.4) in endometrial cancer; median overall survival was 39.6 weeks (95% CI 15.0–67.0) and 37.4 weeks (95% CI 19.0–50.3), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 10 (55.6%) cervical cancer patients and 9 (36.0%) endometrial cancer patients. Health-related quality of life was generally stable over time. Responders had a significantly higher proportion of peripheral T cells when compared to nonresponders (p = 0.013). In conclusion, PRIMMO did not meet its primary objective in both cohorts; pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an IDC had modest but durable antitumor activity with acceptable but not negligible toxicity.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03192059) and EudraCT Registry (number 2016-001569-97).

It is well known that organ transplant recipients are prone to develop non-melanoma skin cancers, particularly cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). This is explained by the long-term use of immunosuppressants and thus the decrease of the immunosurveillance that protects from developing malignant tumours. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are 65-250 times more likely to develop cSCC compared to the general population (Am J Transplant 2017; 17: 2509). Moreover, in these patients cSCCs follow a more aggressive course. Close follow-up and regular skin check-ups by a dermatologist are, therefore, crucial in the management of these patients. When detected early, cSCC can be easily and effectively treated by a simple excision. However, when advanced, outcomes are poor. Immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) have been recently added to our arsenal and represent a breakthrough, having proved to be effective in achieving long-term responses. We, hereby, present two cases of difficult-to-treat cSCCs in renal transplanted patients.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibition with anti-PD(L)1 and anti-CTLA4 antibodies has significantly changed cancer treatment during the last 10 years. Nevertheless, boosting the immune system with immune checkpoint inhibition can result in immune-related adverse events, affecting different organ systems, among which the endocrine system is the most affected. However, there are few descriptions of the association of immune-related adverse events, and the pathophysiology of some is still lacking. Case summary Here, we report a 70-year-old Caucasian patient treated with nivolumab (anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody) after resection of a unique relapse of melanoma in the neck region who presented with sicca syndrome, extreme fatigue, and weight loss 6 months after the start of anti-PD1 therapy. Blood tests revealed hypoglycemia and secondary hypocortisolism due to isolated adrenocorticotrophic hormone deficiency. Interestingly, brain methionine positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance revealed physiological metabolism of the pituitary gland, which was not increased in size, and no hypophyseal metastasis was detected. The sicca syndrome investigation revealed the absence of anti-SSA/SSB antibodies, while the labial salivary gland biopsy showed lymphoplasmatocytic infiltrates with a focus score of 1. To provide new insights into the physiopathology of the anti-PD1-related sialadenitis, we investigated the distribution of aquaporins 5 by immunostaining on the labial salivary gland acini, and compared this distribution with the one expressed in the primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Contrary to patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (in whom aquaporins 5 is mainly expressed at the basolateral side), but similar to the patients with no sialadenitis, we observed expression of aquaporins 5 at the apical pole. This new finding deserves to be confirmed in other patients with anti-PD1-related sialadenitis. Owing to these immune-related adverse events, anti-PD1 was stopped; nevertheless, the patient developed a new relapse 1 year later (March 2020) in the neck region, which was treated by radiotherapy. Since then, no relapse of melanoma was seen (1.5 years after radiotherapy), but the patient still requires hypophyseal replacement therapy. The sialoadenitis resolved partially. Conclusion We report a combination of sialoadenitis and hypophysitis explaining extreme fatigue in a patient who was treated in the adjuvant setting with anti-PD1 for a melanoma relapse.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies form the therapeutic mainstay for v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B V600-mutated metastatic melanoma. Both treatment regimens can cause inflammatory arthritis. The reported incidence of treatment-induced inflammatory arthritis is low, though presumably underestimated due to lack of awareness, clear definitions and uniform grading systems. Nevertheless, recognition is important as inflammatory arthritis can become chronic and thus affect the quality of life beyond treatment. In this short communication, we present two patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICI and targeted therapies who develop severe polyarthritis. Based on their clinical discourse we describe standard inflammatory arthritis treatment modalities and more advanced immunomodulatory treatment options with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Long-term immunosuppressive treatment with glucocorticoids or DMARDs in this setting raises concerns about antitumour response and potential carcinogenic risk. Current literature on this topic is scarce, heterogeneous and retrospective. Prospective analysis of cancer patients treated with DMARDs is needed to clearly address these concerns.

Introduction Prescribing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to cancer patients with an autoimmune disease (AID) is presumed safe when cautious adverse event management is applied. However, guidelines on immunosuppressant (IS) adaptations are limited and real-world evidence is scarce. Methods Current practice of IS adaptations is described in a case series of AID patients treated with ICIs in a tertiary university hospital in Belgium (1/1/2016–31/12/2021). Patient, drug and disease-related data were documented using retrospective chart review. A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed to identify similar cases (1/1/2010–30/11/2022). Results Sixteen patients were described in the case series (62% with active AID). Systemic IS were changed before ICI initiation in 5/9 patients. Four patients continued therapy, of which one achieved partial remission. Patients who had IS (partially) stopped before ICI start (n = 4) had AID flares in two cases; immune-related adverse events in three cases. In the systematic review, 37 cases were identified in 9 articles. Corticosteroids (n = 12) and non-selective IS (n = 27) were continued in, respectively, 66% and 68% of patients. Methotrexate was frequently discontinued (13/21). Biologicals, excluding tocilizumab and vedolizumab, were withheld during ICI treatment. Out of all patients with flares (n = 15), 47% had stopped IS therapy before ICI start and 53% had continued their AID drugs. Conclusions A detailed overview of IS management in patients with AID receiving ICI therapy is presented. Expanding the knowledge base germane to IS management with ICI therapy in the diverse population is essential to evaluate their mutual impact, thus advancing responsible patient care.

BackgroundThe phase I first-in-human study ENGAGE-1 evaluated the humanized IgG1 OX40 agonistic monoclonal antibody GSK3174998 alone (Part 1 (P1)) or in combination with pembrolizumab (Part 2 (P2)) in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsGSK3174998 (0.003–10 mg/kg) ± pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks using a continuous reassessment method for dose escalation. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability; secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity.Results138 patients were enrolled (45 (P1) and 96 (P2, including 3 crossovers)). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 51% (P1) and 64% (P2) of patients, fatigue being the most common (11% and 24%, respectively). No dose-toxicity relationship was observed, and maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Dose-limiting toxicities (P2) included Grade 3 (G3) pleural effusion and G1 myocarditis with G3 increased troponin. GSK3174998 ≥0.3 mg/kg demonstrated pharmacokinetic linearity and >80% receptor occupancy on circulating T cells; 0.3 mg/kg was selected for further evaluation. Limited clinical activity was observed for GSK3174998 (P1: disease control rate (DCR) ≥24 weeks 9%) and was not greater than that expected for pembrolizumab alone (P2: overall response rate 8%, DCR ≥24 weeks 28%). Multiplexed immunofluorescence data from paired biopsies suggested that increased infiltration of natural killer (NK)/natural killer T (NKT) cells and decreased regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment may contribute to clinical responses: CD16+CD56–CD134+ NK /NKT cells and CD3+CD4+FOXP3+CD134+ Tregs exhibited the largest magnitude of change on treatment, whereas CD3+CD8+granzyme B+PD-1+CD134+ cytotoxic T cells were the least variable. Tumor gene expression profiling revealed an upregulation of inflammatory responses, T-cell proliferation, and NK cell function on treatment with some inflammatory cytokines upregulated in peripheral blood. However, target engagement, evidenced by pharmacologic activity in peripheral blood and tumor tissue, did not correlate with clinical efficacy. The low number of responses precluded identifying a robust biomarker signature predictive of response.ConclusionsGSK3174998±pembrolizumab was well tolerated over the dose range tested and demonstrated target engagement. Limited clinical activity does not support further development of GSK3174998±pembrolizumab in advanced cancers.Trial registration numberNCT02528357.

Background Pituitary carcinomas are rare but aggressive and require maximally coordinated multimodal therapies. For refractory tumors, unresponsive to temozolomide (TMZ), therapeutic options are limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may be considered for treatment as illustrated in the present case report. Case We report a patient with ACTH-secreting pituitary carcinoma, progressive after multiple lines of therapy including chemotherapy with TMZ, who demonstrated disease stabilization by a combination of ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) ICI therapy. Discussion Management of pituitary carcinoma beyond TMZ remains ill-defined and relies on case reports. TMZ creates, due to hypermutation, more immunogenic tumors and subsequently potential candidates for ICI therapy. This case report adds support to the possible role of ICI in the treatment of pituitary carcinoma. Conclusion ICI therapy could be a promising treatment option for pituitary carcinoma, considering the mechanisms of TMZ-induced hypermutation with increased immunogenicity, pituitary expression of CTLA-4 and PD-L1, and the frequent occurrence of hypophysitis as a side effect of ICI therapy.

BackgroundThis phase 1b study (NCT02323191) evaluated the safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) emactuzumab in combination with the programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD-L1)-blocking mAb atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors naïve or experienced for immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs).MethodsEmactuzumab (500–1350 mg flat) and atezolizumab (1200 mg flat) were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of emactuzumab was conducted using the 3+3 design up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or optimal biological dose (OBD). Extension cohorts to evaluate pharmacodynamics and clinical activity were conducted in metastatic ICB-naive urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) and ICB-pretreated melanoma (MEL), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and UBC patients.ResultsOverall, 221 patients were treated. No MTD was reached and the OBD was determined at 1000 mg of emactuzumab in combination with 1200 mg of atezolizumab. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25 (11.3%) patients of which fatigue and rash were the most common (14 patients (6.3%) each). The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 9.8% for ICB-naïve UBC, 12.5% for ICB-experienced NSCLC, 8.3% for ICB-experienced UBC and 5.6% for ICB-experienced MEL patients, respectively. Tumor biopsy analyses demonstrated increased activated CD8 +tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) associated with clinical benefit in ICB-naïve UBC patients and less tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) reduction in ICB-experienced compared with ICB-naïve patients.ConclusionEmactuzumab in combination with atezolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile with increased fatigue and skin rash over usual atezolizumab monotherapy. A considerable ORR was particularly seen in ICB-experienced NSCLC patients. Increase ofCD8 +TILs under therapy appeared to be associated with persistence of a TAM subpopulation.

Immunotherapy has become the standard of care for various cancer types. The widespread use of immune checkpoints inhibitors confronts us with a whole range of novel immune-related adverse events. Skin toxicity is one of the most frequent adverse events. In this article, we report a case of anti-PD-1 induced late bullous pemphigoid (BP) with mucosal erosions and associated with a troublesome neurological disorder of undetermined origin in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Skin biopsy was essential to make the diagnosis and rapid initiation of systemic prednisolone played a role in favorable clinical outcome of BP. We will discuss the difficulty of early diagnosis of BP, its unusual association with neurological disorders, and the specific management of this particular dermatological entity.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) as biomarker for the early diagnosis of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the adjuvant setting, and its potential correlation with relapse-free survival (RFS). Prospectively collected data from 72 melanoma patients treated with adjuvant ICIs were pooled. CRP values at diagnosis of 10 irAEs were descriptively analysed. Correlations between RFS and the occurrence of irAEs, the grade of the irAE, the extent of CRP-elevation and the use of corticosteroids for irAE treatment were investigated. A total of 191 irAEs (grade 1/2, n = 182; grade 3/4, n = 9) occurred in 64 patients [skin toxicity (n = 70), fatigue (n = 50), thyroiditis (n = 12), musculoskeletal toxicity (n = 11), sicca syndrome (n = 10), other (n = 23), pneumonitis (n = 6), colitis (n = 4), hepatitis (n = 3) and hypophysitis (n = 2)]. In pneumonitis and hypophysitis, the median CRP levels at diagnosis exceeded the upper limit of normal (ULN, 5 mg/L). After a median follow-up of 26.5 months, 28 patients (39%) had been diagnosed with a melanoma relapse. Patients who experienced no irAE were at the highest risk for relapse (P = 0.008). A trend was observed for patients diagnosed with an irAE that was associated with an elevated CRP (>2xULN) to be at higher risk for relapse as compared to those diagnosed with an irAE and CRP

Background Immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may not be fully covered by existing measures like the PRO-CTCAE™. Selecting PRO-CTCAE™ items for monitoring symptomatic adverse events is hindered by the heterogeneity and complexity of IrAEs, and no standardised selection process exists. We aimed to reach expert consensus on the PRO-CTCAE™ symptom terms relevant for cancer patients receiving ICIs and to gather preliminary expert opinions about additional symptom terms reflecting ICI symptomatic toxicities. Additionally, we gathered expert consensus about a core set of priority symptom terms for prospective surveillance and monitoring. Design This Delphi study involved an international panel of experts (n = 6 physicians; n = 3 nurses, n = 1 psychiatrist and n = 1 patient advocates). Experts prioritised the relevance and importance of symptom terms to monitor in patients treated with ICIs. Results Experts reached a consensus on the relevance of all (n = 80) PRO-CTCAE™ Symptom Terms. Consensus on the importance of these symptom terms for prospective monitoring in patients receiving ICIs was reached for 81% (n = 65) of these terms. Additional symptoms terms (n = 56) were identified, with a consensus that 84% (47/56) of these additional symptom terms should also be considered when monitoring symptomatic IrAEs. Conclusion This study identified a prioritised list of symptom terms for prospective surveillance for symptomatic IrAEs in patients receiving ICI treatment. Our results indicate the need to strengthen the validity of PRO measures used to monitor patients receiving ICIs. While these results provided some support for the content validity of the PRO CTCAE™ and resulted in a preliminary set of salient symptomatic adverse events related to the use of ICIs, broader international agreement and patient involvement are needed to further validate our initial findings.

Purpose of review Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are rapidly changing practice across different tumor settings. With this article, we reflect on how to assimilate the tsunami of ICIs data into clinical practice. Recent findings A tremendous increase on approvals, number of publications, and clinical trials ongoing with ICIs on many different tumor types. Summary ICIs are innovative treatments that are showing a significant benefit on different tumors. More approvals and an explosive increase of knowledge around the usage of ICI are to be expected in the near future, bringing new challenges on how to integrate this fast-growing evidence with ICI into clinical practice. To be updated, oncologists could follow approved guidelines from relevant societies and complement it with an appropriate search from publication databases. There are also some available courses, conferences and online material that are useful to improve knowledge in this so rapidly changing environment. In the future, we believe the integration of artificial intelligence and learning machines will play an important role to facilitate best clinical practices in different fields of medicine but particularly for oncology.

Immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized the treatment for numerous cancer patients; however, the spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains to be fully uncovered. We report a 48-year-old woman who was treated in the Phase III IMpassion130 study (atezolizumab and nanoparticle albumin-bound [nab]-paclitaxel) for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. She experienced a partial response after 3 months. Nevertheless, the patient presented with thickening of the skin and muscle fatigue in the distal extremities together with blood eosinophilia after 15 months. Skin biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging were diagnostic of eosinophilic fasciitis (EF). Symptoms clearly improved upon stopping atezolizumab, while tumor response is still ongoing after discontinuing treatment. We identified five other cases of EF during immunotherapy, all occurring after about 1 year and in contrast to our case, mostly accompanied by other irAEs. This highlights that even if EF is a rare irAE, timely recognition and management remains important.

Treatment with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is widely accepted as a first-line treatment option for patients with advanced BRAF V600E mutant melanoma. It is generally well-tolerated and has limited side-effects. However, we report a case of a sarcoid-like syndrome induced by treatment with dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) in a patient with stage IV-M1d melanoma. Sarcoid-like syndrome is a known side-effect of immune checkpoint-inhibition therapy but has only rarely been described in BRAF/MEK inhibition. However, recognizing this side-effect is important because of potential misinterpretation as progressive disease and influence on treatment. We describe a 48-year-old female patient who initially presented with solitary brain metastasis and diffuse lung lesions. She was treated with D/T to which she had an initial response in all lesions. One year later, new hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies were detected. Imaging was suggestive of the sarcoid-like syndrome. An endoscopic biopsy of the enlarged lymph node showed no melanoma cells. Treatment was continued. Three months later, the patient experienced a drop in hemoglobin, which prompted further investigations into possible occult intestinal metastasis. Video capsule examination revealed a metastatic lesion in the small intestine. A treatment switch to the combination of checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and ipilimumab successfully treated both lung and small intestine lesions. After the third dose of this combination therapy, she developed an immune-related pneumonitis. Treatment with corticosteroids resolved the pneumonitis and decreased metabolism in the sarcoid-like syndrome. The treatment was not restarted afterward. She remains free of the disease up to today, 2.5 years after diagnosis.

Immune checkpoint inhibition has improved the clinical outcomes for numerous patients with cancer. However, the downside is a whole new spectrum of immune-related adverse events. We report a 68-year-old man with a history of nonsmall cell lung cancer presenting with a spontaneous corneal perforation in the right eye after 22 cycles of pembrolizumab. In addition, a chronic central nonhealing epithelial defect developed after performing a penetrating keratoplasty. Treatment with autologous serum drops resulted in complete healing of the corneal ulcer, where other conventional therapies had no effect. One month after reinitiating pembrolizumab therapy, our patient presented again with a corneal perforation in the fellow eye. This case describes relapsing sterile ulcerations associated with pembrolizumab use and presents an unexpected cure.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) typically occur within 4 months of starting anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-based therapy [anti-PD-1 ± anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4)], but delayed irAEs (onset >12 months after commencement) can also occur. This study describes the incidence, nature and management of delayed irAEs in patients receiving anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with delayed irAEs from 20 centres were studied. The incidence of delayed irAEs was estimated as a proportion of melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1-based therapy and surviving >1 year. Onset, clinical features, management and outcomes of irAEs were examined.RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen patients developed a total of 140 delayed irAEs (20 after initial combination with anti-CTLA4), with an estimated incidence of 5.3% (95% confidence interval 4.0-6.9, 53/999 patients at sites with available data). The median onset of delayed irAE was 16 months (range 12-53 months). Eighty-seven patients (74%) were on anti-PD-1 at irAE onset, 15 patients (12%) were 3 months from the last dose of anti-PD-1. The most common delayed irAEs were colitis, rash and pneumonitis; 55 of all irAEs (39%) were ≥grade 3. Steroids were required in 80 patients (68%), as well as an additional immunosuppressive agent in 27 patients (23%). There were two irAE-related deaths: encephalitis with onset during anti-PD-1 and a multiple-organ irAE with onset 11 months after ceasing anti-PD-1. Early irAEs (CONCLUSIONS: Delayed irAEs occur in a small but relevant subset of patients. Delayed irAEs are often different from previous irAEs, may be high grade and can lead to death. They mostly occur in patients still receiving anti-PD-1. The risk of delayed irAE should be considered when deciding the duration of treatment in responding patients. However, patients who stop treatment may also rarely develop delayed irAE.

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is an important predictive biomarker in breast cancer (BC). Tumor heterogeneity has been described, with changes in HER2 expression levels between lesions and over the disease course. HER2 expression is assessed on tissue biopsies, at primary diagnosis and in metastatic lesions. A whole-body imaging technique such as PET/CT could help understand expression levels in different lesions. A 68Ga-labeled single domain antibody (sdAb) targeting the HER2 receptor has been developed and proven safe (Keyaerts et al., 2016). Imaging is performed at 90 min post-injection (pi). We report results of a phase II trial to assess the repeatability of the technique in 20 patients and the correlation of tracer uptake with HER2 tissue expression of the lesions present at the time of imaging. Methods: Twenty patients (pts) with a locally advanced or metastatic BC with at least one lesion of minimum 12 mm were included. Pts were injected intravenously with a typical protein mass of 100 µg and a radioactive dose ranging from 98-168 MBq 68GaNOTA-anti-HER2 sdAb. PET/CT images were obtained at 90 min pi. A second tracer injection followed by PET/CT was done with a maximal interval of 8 days. To assess repeatability, up to 5 lesions per pt were selected, with no more than 2 in a single organ. Peak Standard Uptake Values (SUVpeak) of the lesions were measured on both scans and compared with a t-test and Bland-Altman Plots. Images were compared to other available medical or imaging data and interpreted considering the subject’s disease course. Serum and plasma samples were collected before injection and between 60 and 365 days pi and stored for future detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and liquid biopsies analysis for the presence of HER2 amplification. Tissue samples were assessed by central labs using mass spectrometry, immunohistochemistry and in fluorescence situ hybridization. Results: Twenty women with BC (6 HER2+, 14 HER2-) with a mean age of 58.6 y (37-81) were included. Three pts were scanned only once (2 due to withdrawal of consent, 1 due to covid pandemic). Repeatability of the technique was visually scored as excellent. For quantification, 50 lesions were compared on both scans in 17 pts without significant differences between the two measurements (p=0.40). The repeatability coefficient (RC) was 38.2%. The mean absolute percentage difference (MAPD) was 13.6%, comparable to repeat values reported for 18F-FDG. In 3 out of 6 HER2-positive (HER2+) patients, lesions showed high uptake, even better visible than using 18F-FDG in 2 of them. In 2 HER2+ subjects with a negative scan, lesions were confirmed to be true negatives: one patient did not relapse from BC but had tuberculosis; the other was confirmed to have a radiopneumonitis after radiotherapy and no relapse. In 1 HER2+ patient, the uptake was unexpectedly low. However, the HER2 status was also not reconfirmed in the metastatic setting for this subject. In 1 HER2-negative patient, the tumor HER2 status was changed from negative to positive based on a subsequent image-guided biopsy performed in this study. High tracer uptake was also seen in many of the patients presenting with HER2-low BC (IHC 1+ or 2+), indicating the potential of the tracer to detect low-level HER2 expression. Additional correlation to centrally performed tissue and blood analysis is ongoing. Conclusion: 68GaNOTA-Anti-HER2 PET/CT shows high uptake in HER2-expressing BC lesions but also in HER2-low lesions. The technique shows good repeatability and, in some cases, even better sensitivity than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Specificity was confirmed in relapse-free lesions such as tuberculosis and radiopneumonitis. Its sensitivity makes it a promising technique to assess HER2+ and HER2-low lesions in BC patients. Citation Format: Odrade Gondry, Catarina Xavier, Wim Waelput, Omar Al Dabssi, Marian Vanhoeij, Sandrine Aspeslagh, Sofie Joris, Christel Fontaine, Guy Verfaillie, Jacques De Grève, Katrien Glorieus, Ine Luyten, Frederik Vandenbroucke, Sophie Bourgeois, Laurens Raes, Sheeno Thyparambil, Nick Devoogdt, Ilse Vaneycken, Julie Cousaert, Vicky Caveliers, Hendrik Everaert, Tony Lahoutte, Marleen Keyaerts. Assessment of repeatability and uptake quantification of 68GaNOTA-anti-HER2 sdAb PET/CT in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-02-05.

We report a case of anti-protein death 1-induced sarcoid-like reaction in a 63-year-old Caucasian male who was diagnosed with stage IV-M1a melanoma. He was initially treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (Q3W) and had a complete response after 14 cycles. However, relapse was suspected 3 months later with appearance of hilar, mediastinal and hepatic hilar lymph nodes as well as a skin lesion. Biopsy of both the hilar lymph nodes and the skin lesion demonstrated sarcomatoid granulomatosis. Pembrolizumab was discontinued temporarily. While on F-FDG-PET/CT, all sarcoid-like lesions regressed in size and activity, a new hypermetabolic solitary skeletal lesion was detected in a lumbar vertebra, suspicious for metastasis. However, since the patient was asymptomatic, a watchful-waiting attitude was taken. During this period, a spontaneous and complete resolution of the metabolic activity was observed of the skeletal lesion. Until today, the patient remains in complete remission. Current case presents an atypical presentation and evolution of anti-PD-1-induced sarcoid-like reaction, illustrating the difficulty of differentiating it from disease progression. Before considering (re-)initiation of anti-melanoma therapy, a tissue biopsy of one of the suspected lesions may be performed to confirm diagnosis. Physicians treating patients with ICI should be aware of this difficulty and critically assess the nature of lesions suspect of progression in patients responding to ICI and presenting with a sarcoid-like reaction.

BACKGROUND: Cancer seems to have an independent adverse prognostic effect on COVID-19-related mortality, but uncertainty exists regarding its effect across different patient subgroups. We report a population-based analysis of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 with prior or current solid cancer versus those without cancer. METHODS: We analysed data of adult patients registered until 24 May 2020 in the Belgian nationwide database of Sciensano. The primary objective was in-hospital mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis among patients with solid cancer versus patients without cancer. Severe event occurrence, a composite of intensive care unit admission, invasive ventilation and/or death, was a secondary objective. These endpoints were analysed across different patient subgroups. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyse the association between cancer and clinical characteristics (baseline analysis) and the effect of cancer on in-hospital mortality and on severe event occurrence, adjusting for clinical characteristics (in-hospital analysis). RESULTS: A total of 13 594 patients (of whom 1187 with solid cancer (8.7%)) were evaluable for the baseline analysis and 10 486 (892 with solid cancer (8.5%)) for the in-hospital analysis. Patients with cancer were older and presented with less symptoms/signs and lung imaging alterations. The 30-day in-hospital mortality was higher in patients with solid cancer compared with patients without cancer (31.7% vs 20.0%, respectively; adjusted OR (aOR) 1.34; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.58). The aOR was 3.84 (95% CI 1.94 to 7.59) among younger patients (

Background: Preclinical and clinical data suggest MEK-inhibition (MEKi) to be effective in NRAS-mutant (mt) and NRAS wild-type (wt) melanoma. However, MEKi causes considerable cutaneous treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) which are less present if MEKi is combined with BRAFi. Methods: This open-label, dual-stratum, single-center phase 2 clinical trial investi- gated trametinib (T; 2 mg QD) in patients (pts) with advanced BRAFV600 wt, NRASQ61R/ K/L mt/wt melanoma who had progressed following or were ineligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors. In case of T-related cutaneous TRAE, low-dose dabrafenib (ld-D; 50 mg BID) was added to prevent further skin TRAE. The trial was amended in June 2019 to administer ld-D upfront with T. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints were progression- free and overall survival and safety. Results: Between Jan and Dec 2019, 9 pts initiated T monotherapy and 8 pts initiated T þ ld-D. TRAE were seen in 15 pts (29%G3-4; 29% SAE). One pt permanently interrupted T due to G3 pneumonitis. All 9 pts who initiated T monotherapy devel- oped G1-2 acneiform rash which resolved (to G0: 6 pts; to G1: 3 pts) with temporary interruption of T, local metronidazole therapy and subsequent addition of ld-D to T. One pt had a G1 recurrence of acneiform rash that was managed with local therapy. Of 8 pts who initiated T þ ld-D upfront, 1 developed G1 acneiform rash that resolved with local therapy only. Other TRAE are shown in the table. T dose was reduced in 4 pts for TRAE (1 pt with left ventricular ejection fraction decrease; 1 with central serous retinopathy; 1 with AST/ALT increase; 1 with hyponatremia and syncope). The unconfirmed ORR is 4/15 and the disease control rate is 7/15 evaluable pts. Conclusions: No unexpected toxicities were seen with T or T + ld-D. ld-D is able to prevent T-related skin toxicity. Thus, combining ld-D with T is a safe approach to in- crease tolerance of and optimize exposure to T. Clinical trial identification: NCT04059224; EudraCT 2018-004003-39. Legal entity responsible for the study: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel. Funding: Novartis, Stichting tegen Kanker. Disclosure: G. Awada: Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Astellas; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis. J.K. Schwarze: Travel/ Accommodation/Expenses: Amgen; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme. S. Aspeslagh: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advi- sory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Sanofi; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis. B. Neyns: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: EtheRNA; Advi- sory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: CryoStorage; Research grant/Funding (institu- tion): Pfizer; Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck Serono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.039

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer therapy and outcomes over the past 5 years. Following the initial successes of anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents, a huge wave of novel agents and novel combinations has entered early phase trials, leading to an unprecedented exponential increase in phase 1 trials. These agents, which display different characteristics from conventional cytotoxic therapy and targeted therapies, have deeply challenged many paradigms of traditional phase 1 studies, including dose-determination, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, efficacy evaluation, patient selection, routes of administration, trial design and endpoints. The historical “safety” phase 1 trials have been transformed to “phase 1 registration” trials, using seamless designs, enrolling several hundreds of patients and sometimes leading to drug approval. However, severe unexpected toxicities have also been observed, especially in combination trials, calling for cautious, rationale and measured drug development. In this chapter, we present the different types of immunotherapy agents currently being evaluated in phase 1 trials, detail the major transformations in phase 1 trial designs, and discuss challenges that will need to be tackled to rationally optimize immunotherapy development.

International audience; Epigenetic dysregulation has long been recognized as a key factor contributing to tumorigenesis and tumour maintenance that can influence all of the recognized hallmarks of cancer. Despite regulatory approvals for the treatment of certain haematological malignancies, the efficacy of the first generation of epigenetic drugs (epi-drugs) in patients with solid tumours has been disappointing; however, successes have now been achieved in selected solid tumour subtypes, thanks to the development of novel compounds and a better understanding of cancer biology that have enabled precision medicine approaches. Several lines of evidence support that, beyond their potential as monotherapies, epigenetic drugs could have important roles in synergy with other anticancer therapies or in reversing acquired therapy resistance. Herein, we review the mechanisms by which epi-drugs can modulate the sensitivity of cancer cells to other forms of anticancer therapy, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We provide a critical appraisal of the preclinical rationale, completed clinical studies and ongoing clinical trials relating to combination therapies incorporating epi-drugs. Finally, we propose and discuss rational clinical trial designs and drug development strategies, considering key factors including patient selection, tumour biomarker evaluation, drug scheduling and response assessment and study end points, with the aim of optimizing the development of such combinations.; La dysrégulation épigénétique est depuis longtemps reconnue comme un facteur clé contribuant à la tumorigénèse et à la maintenance des tumeurs qui peut influencer toutes les caractéristiques reconnues du cancer. Malgré les approbations réglementaires pour le traitement de certaines malignités hématologiques, l'efficacité de la première génération de médicaments épigénétiques (épi-drugs) chez les patients atteints de tumeurs solides a été décevante ; cependant, des succès ont maintenant été obtenus dans certains sous-types de tumeurs solides, grâce au développement de nouveaux composés et à une meilleure compréhension de la biologie du cancer qui ont permis des approches médicales de précision. Plusieurs sources de preuves soutiennent que, au-delà de leur potentiel en tant que monothérapies, les médicaments épigénétiques pourraient jouer un rôle important en synergie avec d'autres thérapies anticancéreuses ou pour inverser la résistance acquise à la thérapie. Nous passons ici en revue les mécanismes par lesquels les médicaments épigénétiques peuvent moduler la sensibilité des cellules cancéreuses à d'autres formes de thérapie anticancéreuse, notamment la chimiothérapie, la radiothérapie, l'hormonothérapie, la thérapie moléculaire ciblée et l'immunothérapie. Nous fournissons une évaluation critique du raisonnement préclinique, des études cliniques achevées et des essais cliniques en cours concernant les thérapies combinées incorporant des médicaments d'épinéphrine. Enfin, nous proposons et discutons des plans d'essais cliniques rationnels et des stratégies de développement de médicaments, en tenant compte de facteurs clés tels que la sélection des patients, l'évaluation des biomarqueurs tumoraux, la programmation des médicaments et l'évaluation de la réponse et les résultats des études, dans le but d'optimiser le développement de ces combinaisons.

Side effects of immune checkpoint blockade are often said to be infrequent and usually mild. The uniqueness of endocrine immune-related adverse events is their non-reversibility, with incidence and prevalence destined to increase in the coming years, particularly if immunotherapy is used at earlier stages of neoplastic disease. Immune-related hypophysitis is one of these observed endocrine adverse events. It is often difficult to diagnose, sometimes occurring without specific symptoms. It can lead to irreversibly altered functioning of diverse endocrine glands. Radiographically, the differential diagnosis of hypophysitis includes pituitary apoplexy and primary and secondary neoplastic lesions. Immune-related hypophysitis is most common with single-agent anti-CTLA-4, followed by the combination of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1, while occurs infrequently when anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 agents are administered alone. Hypophysitis with immune checkpoint blockade requires early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Patients can present with headache, visual disturbances or other endocrine-related syndromes or they can be asymptomatic. The manifestation of symptoms should prompt blood analysis and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Imaging is important to exclude secondary meningeal or parenchymal lesions. Management should include discontinuation of the immune checkpoint blockade, initiation of corticosteroid therapy and eventually hormone replacement therapy. Hypophysitis impacts treatment of the disease and usually requires long-term management of this irreversible side effect. A multidisciplinary team approach is merited to insure the correct diagnosis and management of immune-related hypophysitis.

Background Immune therapies have revolutionized cancer treatment over the last few years by allowing improvements in overall survival. However, the majority of patients is still primary or secondary resistant to such therapies, and enhancing sensitivity to immune therapies is therefore crucial to improve patient outcome. Several recent lines of evidence suggest that epigenetic modifiers have intrinsic immunomodulatory properties, which could be of therapeutic interest. Material and methods We reviewed preclinical evidence and clinical studies which describe or exploit immunomodulatory properties of epigenetic agents. Experimental approaches, clinical applicability and corresponding ongoing clinical trials are described. Results Several epigenetic modifiers, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors, DNA methyl transferase inhibitors, bromodomain inhibitors, lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 inhibitors and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors, display intrinsic immunomodulatory properties. The latter can be achieved through the action of these drugs either on cancer cells (e.g. presentation and generation of neoantigens, induction of immunogenic cell death, modulation of cytokine secretion), on immune cells (e.g. linage, differentiation, activation status and antitumor capability), or on components of the microenvironment (e.g. regulatory T cells and macrophages). Several promising combinations, notably with immune checkpoint blockers or adoptive T-cell therapy, can be envisioned. Dedicated clinically relevant approaches for patient selection and trial design will be required to optimally develop such combinations. Conclusion In an era where immune therapies are becoming a treatment backbone in many tumour types, epigenetic modifiers could play a crucial role in modulating tumours’ immunogenicity and sensitivity to immune agents. Optimal trial design, including window of opportunity trials, will be key in the success of this approach, and clinical evaluation is ongoing.

Phase I clinical trials in oncology primarily aim to assess the toxicity profile of new drugs and determine recommended phase II doses (RP2D). Since the cancer rate increases with age and our population is continually aging, RP2D must necessarily be assessed in older patients. Few clinical studies include older patients, however, and particularly few Phase I trials. We reviewed published data on the safety and efficacy of Phase I trials in older patients. The majority of studies included primarily young, fit patients, with age thresholds varying widely from 65 to 80years. However, age does not seem to be associated with more toxicity or less efficacy. While Phase I trials seem feasible in fit older patients, geriatric-medicine score systems should be included in the clinical trial design in order to better characterize this population.

INTRODUCTION: A number of phase I immunotherapy trials for cancer patients incorporate the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) as an inclusion criteria. This study aims to assess whether ALC is associated with a lack of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in early clinical trials. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in phase I trials in our institution between December 2011 and January 2014 were reviewed. Baseline ALC, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Royal-Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR = SD + PR + CR, stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), complete response (CR)) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 were retrieved. RESULTS: Out of a total of 167 patients, 48 (28.7%) and 8 patients (4.8%) had baseline ALCs of 1 G/l. When using 0.5 G/l as ALC threshold, we did not find any difference either in ORR or in DCR. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, baseline ALC was not associated with overall survival, whereas the RMH and the number of previous lines of treatment remained independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline ALC was not associated with response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in cancer patients enrolled in phase I trials. Patients should not be excluded from early phase clinical trials testing immune checkpoints blockers because of ALC.

// Astrid De Meulenaere 1, * , Tijl Vermassen 1 , Sandrine Aspeslagh 2 , Philippe Deron 3 , Frederic Duprez 4 , Debby Laukens 5 , Jo Van Dorpe 6 , Liesbeth Ferdinande 6, * and Sylvie Rottey 1, * 1 Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 2 DITEP, Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, 94800 Villejuif, France 3 Department of Head, Neck and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 6 Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium * These authors are senior authors Correspondence to: Astrid De Meulenaere, email: astrid.demeulenaere@ugent.be Keywords: oropharynx, HPV, PD-L1, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, biomarker Received: March 06, 2017 Accepted: June 20, 2017 Published: July 06, 2017 ABSTRACT Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of PD-L1 in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Its relation with clinicopathological variables, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and survival was also determined. Results: Positive PD-L1 status for the SP142 clone related with improved overall survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumors heavily infiltrated by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were also linked with better outcome, and this as well for the total number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes as for the CD3 + and CD8 + T cell count. A Cox proportional hazard model proved that solely infiltrating CD8 + T cells exhibit a positive effect on overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.31 [0.14–0.70]; P = 0.0050) Materials and Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from oropharyngeal tumors of 99 patients was immunohistochemically stained for PD-L1 (SP142 and 22C3 clones), CD3, CD8 and FoxP3. Expression of PD-L1, CD3, CD8, FoxP3 and HPV status were correlated with clinicopathological variables. Overall survival was determined by a log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test whereas the Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that CD8 + T lymphocytes constitute an independent prognostic marker in patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. PD-L1 positivity for SP142, but not for 22C3, also tends to have a positive effect on survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.