Search

Background: It has been speculated that pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) is a distinct disease entity, with probably different disease subtypes. We therefore aimed to accurately phenotype newly diagnosed pediatric CD by using the pediatric modification of the Montreal classification, the Paris classification. Methods: Information was collected from the EUROKIDS registry, a prospective, web-based registry of new-onset pediatric IBD patients in 17 European countries and Israel. When a complete diagnostic workup was performed (ileocolonoscopy, upper gastrointestinal [GI] endoscopy, small bowel imaging), CD patients were evaluated for ileocolonic disease extent, esophagogastroduodenal involvement, and jejunal/proximal ileal involvement. Disease behavior and the occurrence of granulomas were also analyzed. Results: In all, 582 pediatric CD patients could be classified according to the Paris classification. Isolated terminal ileal disease (±limited cecal disease) was seen at presentation in 16%, isolated colonic disease in 27%, ileocolonic disease in 53%, and isolated upper GI disease in 4% of patients. In total, 30% had esophagogastroduodenal involvement and 24% jejunal/proximal ileal disease. Patients with L2 disease were less likely to have esophagogastroduodenal involvement or stricturing disease than patients with L1 or L3 disease. Terminal ileal disease and stricturing disease behavior were more common in children diagnosed after 10 years of age than in younger patients. Granulomas were identified in 43% of patients. Conclusions: Accurate phenotyping is essential in pediatric CD, as this affects the management of individual patients. Disease phenotypes differ according to age at disease onset. The Paris classification is a useful tool to capture the variety of phenotypic characteristics of pediatric CD. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;)

Substantial scientific evidence and consequent general agreement now exists among pediatric gastroenterologists that optimal management of mildly to moderately dehydrated children in Europe should consist of the following “ Six Pillars of Good Practice” : Use of oral rehydration solution (ORS) to correct estimated dehydration in 3 to 4 hours (i.e., fast rehydration) (1– 5). Use of hypoosmolar solution (60 mmol/L sodium, 74– 111 mmol/L glucose) (6– 12). Continuation of breast-feeding throughout (13). Early refeeding, i.e., resumption of normal diet (without restriction of lactose intake) after 4 hours rehydration (1– 5, 14– 26). Prevention of further dehydration by supplementing maintenance fluids with ORS (10 mmol/kg/watery stool (1– 4). No unnecessary medication (27– 28).

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of infants who are dehydrated as a result of acute gastroenteritis is to administer oral rehydration therapy (ORT). Traditionally, food has been withdrawn for 24-48 h, but there is no conclusive evidence that this is of any real benefit to the patient. Immediate modified feeding, in which an infant on ORT is not starved but administered a limited diet, may have benefits in the treatment of gastroenteritis, especially in children who are nutritionally compromised before they develop the illness. AIM: A pilot study was carried out to investigate the effects of giving infants suffering from acute gastroenteritis a limited modified diet in conjunction with ORT. METHOD: Infants recruited into the study by their general practitioner or by a research doctor in the hospital casualty unit of Bristol Children's Hospital were randomly allocated to receive ORT with or without immediate modified feeding. The duration of diarrhoea, weight change, and incidence of vomiting and lactose intolerance were measured in both treatment groups, and the results were compared. RESULTS: Of the infants studied, 27 received ORT and immediate modified feeding, and 32 ORT alone. The duration of diarrhoea, and incidence of vomiting or lactose intolerance were no greater in the group receiving immediate modified feeding. Patients who received ORT and immediate modified feeding appeared to gain more weight than the infants who were starved for 24-48 h, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Immediate modified feeding is safe and effective, and may have nutritional advantages over traditional ORT with starvation. A similar but multicentre study using unmodified diet, i.e. child's normal diet, is being carried out by a working group of The European Society of Paediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition (ESPGAN).