Search

Sofia Eriksson,1 Maaike Giezeman,2,3 Mikael Hasselgren,2,3 Christer Janson,4 Marta A Kisiel,5 Scott Montgomery,2,6,7 Anna Nager,8 Hanna Sandelowsky,7,9 Björn Ställberg,10 Josefin Sundh,11 Karin Lisspers10 1Region Dalarna, Falun, Sweden; 2School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; 3Centre for Clinical Research and Education, Region Värmland, Karlstad, Sweden; 4Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 5Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environment Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 6Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 7Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College, London, UK; 8NVS, Section for Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 9Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 10Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 11Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, SwedenCorrespondence: Karin Lisspers, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-75122, Sweden, Tel +46703524721, Email Karin.lisspers@regiondalarna.se; Karin.lisspers@uu.sePurpose: To study risk factors for uncontrolled asthma and insufficient quality of life (QoL) in patients with mild asthma, ie those without preventer treatment.Patients and Methods: Patients aged 18– 75 years with a doctor’s diagnosis of asthma randomly selected from primary and secondary care in Sweden. Mild asthma was defined as self-reported current asthma and no preventer treatment. Data were collected from self-completed questionnaires in 2012 and 2015. Well-controlled asthma was defined as Asthma Control Test (ACT) ≥ 20 points and no exacerbation and uncontrolled asthma as ACT< 20 points and/or at least one exacerbation in the previous six months. QoL was measured by the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ), where a total mean score of ≥ 6 indicated sufficient and < 6 insufficient QoL. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using asthma control and Mini-AQLQ as dependent variables. Asthma control was dichotomized as controlled and uncontrolled asthma and the Mini-AQLQ as sufficient QoL (mean score ≥ 6) and insufficient QoL (mean score < 6).Results: Among 298 patients, 26% had uncontrolled asthma, 40% insufficient QoL and 20% both uncontrolled asthma and insufficient QoL. Age ≥ 60 years, obesity, daily smoking, rhinitis and inadequate knowledge of asthma self-management were independently associated with poor asthma control. Factors independently associated with insufficient QoL were age ≥ 60 years, overweight, obesity, rhinitis, sinusitis and inadequate knowledge of asthma self-management. Age ≥ 60 years, obesity, rhinitis and inadequate knowledge of asthma self-management were independently associated with both uncontrolled asthma and insufficient QoL.Conclusion: Among asthma patients without preventer medication, 26% had uncontrolled asthma and 40% had insufficient asthma-related QoL. Older age, obesity, and rhinitis were risk factors for both poor asthma control and a reduced QoL, but having good knowledge of asthma self-management reduced this risk. Our findings suggest that this group of patients requires further attention and follow-up.Plain Language Summary: Many patients with little symptoms of asthma do not take asthma-preventer medication as their asthma is recognized as mild. Still, it is well-known that in this group there are patients with frequent and severe symptoms and acute attacks of asthma, defined as uncontrolled asthma. Quality of life (QoL) is less studied in these patients. Our aim was to study patient characteristics and factors with a higher risk for uncontrolled asthma and insufficient QoL in patients with mild asthma.We studied patients with asthma diagnosis 18– 75 of age in Sweden who reported asthma and no asthma preventer medication. They answered questionnaires about characteristics, knowledge of asthma, asthma symptoms, acute asthma attacks and QoL. A test for asthma symptom control, the Asthma Control Test (ACT), was answered, where 20 points or more meant good asthma symptom control. Patients were regarded as having uncontrolled asthma if they had less than 20 points and/or at least one acute asthma attack the last six months. QoL was measured by the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. A mean score of 6 or more meant sufficient and less than 6 insufficient QoL.Of the 298 patients, 26% had uncontrolled asthma, 40% had insufficient QoL and 20% had both. Patients with risk for both uncontrolled asthma and insufficient QoL were 60 years and over, with obesity, rhinitis and those who reported insufficient knowledge of how to handle asthma. Our results suggest that patients with mild asthma need more attention, better management and follow-ups.Keywords: asthma, management, risk factors, asthma outcomes

Carolina Smith,1,2 Ayako Hiyoshi,1,3 Mikael Hasselgren,2,4 Hanna Sandelowsky,5– 7 Björn Ställberg,8 Scott Montgomery1,5,9 1Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; 2Centre for Clinical Research and Education, Region Värmland, Karlstad, Sweden; 3Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; 4School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; 5Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 6Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 7Academic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden; 8Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 9Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College, London, UKCorrespondence: Carolina Smith, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and HealthÖrebro University, Örebro, 701 82, Sweden, Email Carolina.smith@oru.sePurpose: Patients with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often have other chronic disorders. This study aims to describe the life-course pattern of morbidity in patients with COPD.Patients and Methods: Among all residents aged 50– 90 years in Sweden in 1997, people with a hospital COPD diagnosis were identified using Swedish national registers (1997– 2018). Each patient with COPD was matched by sex, birthyear and county of residency with up to five COPD-free controls. Other chronic disease diagnoses were identified during 1987– 2018. Conditional logistic regression calculated risk of diseases diagnosed prior to first COPD diagnosis, producing odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Cox regression estimated risk of diagnoses after first COPD diagnosis, producing hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI.Results: Among 2,706,814 individuals, 225,159 (8.3%) had COPD. The nested case–control sample included 223,945 COPD-cases with 1,062,731 controls. Prior to first COPD diagnosis, future COPD patients had higher risks than controls for most examined conditions. Highest risks were seen for chronic heart failure (OR = 3.25, 3.20– 3.30), peripheral arterial disease (OR = 3.12, 3.06– 3.18) and lung cancer (OR = 12.73, 12.12– 13.37). Following the COPD diagnosis, individuals with COPD had higher risks of most conditions than individuals without COPD. Chronic heart failure (HR = 3.50, 3.46– 3.53), osteoporosis (HR = 3.35, 3.30– 3.42), depression (HR = 2.58, 2.53– 2.64) and lung cancer (HR = 6.04, 5.90– 6.18) predominated. The risk of vascular dementia was increased after COPD diagnosis (HR = 1.53, 1.48– 1.58) but not Alzheimer’s disease.Conclusion: Accumulation of chronic morbidity may precede COPD. Following the diagnosis, an increased burden of cardiovascular disease and cancer is to be expected, but subsequent depression, osteoporosis, and vascular dementia should also be noted. Management strategies for patients with COPD should consider the higher-than-average risk of multimorbidity.Keywords: COPD, multimorbidity, register-study

Dennis Bouhuis,1 Maaike Giezeman,1,2 Mikael Hasselgren,1,2 Christer Janson,3 Marta A Kisiel,4 Karin Lisspers,5 Scott Montgomery,6– 8 Anna Nager,9 Hanna Sandelowsky,7,9,10 Björn Ställberg,5 Josefin Sundh11 1School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; 2Centre for Clinical Research and Education, Karlstad, Sweden; 3Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 4Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 5Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 6Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro, Sweden; 7Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 8Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College, London, UK; 9Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 10Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm, Sweden; 11Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, SwedenCorrespondence: Josefin Sundh, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden, Tel +46702349517, Email josefin.sundh@regionorebrolan.seBackground: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and no exacerbations may need less maintenance treatment and follow-up. The aim was to identify factors associated with a non-exacerbator COPD phenotype.Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 1354 patients from primary and secondary care, with a doctor’s diagnosis of COPD. In 2014, data on demographics, exacerbation frequency and symptoms using COPD Assessment Test (CAT) were collected using questionnaires and on spirometry and comorbid conditions by record review. The non-exacerbator phenotype was defined as having reported no exacerbations the previous six months. Multivariable logistic regression with the non-exacerbator phenotype as dependent variable was performed, including stratification and interaction analyses by sex.Results: The non-exacerbator phenotype was found in 891 (66%) patients and was independently associated with COPD stage 1 (OR [95% CI] 5.72 [3.30– 9.92]), stage 2 (3.42 [2.13– 5.51]) and stage 3 (2.38 [1.46– 3.88]) compared with stage 4, and with CAT score < 10 (3.35 [2.34– 4.80]). Chronic bronchitis and underweight were inversely associated with the non-exacerbator phenotype (0.47 [0.28– 0.79]) and (0.68 [0.48– 0.97]), respectively. The proportion of non-exacerbators was higher among patients with no maintenance treatment or a single bronchodilator. The association of COPD stage 1 compared with stage 4 with the non-exacerbator phenotype was stronger in men (p for interaction 0.048). In women, underweight and obesity were both inversely associated with the non-exacerbator phenotype (p for interaction 0.033 and 0.046 respectively), and in men heart failure was inversely associated with the non-exacerbator phenotype (p for interaction 0.030).Conclusion: The non-exacerbator phenotype is common, especially in patients with no maintenance treatment or a single bronchodilator, and is characterized by preserved lung function, low symptom burden, and by absence of chronic bronchitis, underweight and obesity and heart failure. We suggest these patients may need less treatment and follow-up, but that management of comorbid conditions is important to avoid exacerbations.Keywords: COPD, exacerbations, lung function, CAT, body mass index, chronic bronchitis, sex, heart failure

Maaike Giezeman,1,2 Josefin Sundh,3 Åsa Athlin,1 Karin Lisspers,4 Björn Ställberg,4 Christer Janson,5 Scott Montgomery,6– 8 Marta A Kisiel,9 Anna Nager,10 Hanna Sandelowsky,7,10,11 Mikael Hasselgren1,2 1School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; 2Centre for Clinical Research and Education, Karlstad, Sweden; 3Department of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; 4Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 5Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy & Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 6Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; 7Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 8Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; 9Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 10Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Inst NVS, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 11Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, SwedenCorrespondence: Maaike Giezeman, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden, Email Maaike.giezeman@oru.sePurpose: The aim of this study was to examine the association of comorbid heart disease, defined as chronic heart failure or ischemic heart disease, on all-cause and cause-specific hospitalization and mortality in patients with COPD over a period of nearly 15 years.Materials and Methods: The cohort study included patients with COPD from primary and secondary care in 2005 with data from questionnaires and medical record reviews. The Swedish Board of Health and Welfare provided hospitalization and mortality data from 2005 through 2019. Cox regression analyses, adjusted for sex, age, educational level, smoking status, BMI, exacerbations, dyspnea score and comorbid diabetes or hypertension, assessed the association of comorbid heart disease with all-cause and cause-specific time to first hospitalization and death. Linear regression analyses, adjusted for the same variables, assessed this association with hospitalization days per year for those patients that had been hospitalized.Results: Of the 1071 patients, 262 (25%) had heart disease at baseline. Cox regression analysis showed a higher risk of hospitalization for patients with heart disease for all-cause (HR (95% CI) 1.55; 1.32– 1.82), cardiovascular (2.14; 1.70– 2.70) and other causes (1.27; 1.06– 1.52). Patients with heart disease also had an increased risk of all-cause (1.77; 1.48– 2.12), cardiovascular (3.40; 2.41– 4.78) and other (1.50; 1.09– 2.06) mortality. Heart disease was significantly associated with more hospitalization days per year of all-cause (regression coefficient 0.37; 95% CI 0.15– 0.59), cardiovascular (0.57; 0.27– 0.86) and other (0.37; 0.12– 0.62) causes. No significant associations were found between heart disease and respiratory causes of hospitalization and death.Conclusion: Comorbid heart disease in patients with COPD is associated with an increased risk for all-cause hospitalization and mortality, mainly due to an increase of hospitalization and death of cardiovascular and other causes, but not because of respiratory disease. This finding advocates the need of a strong clinical focus on primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with COPD.Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, comorbidity, chronic heart failure, ischemic heart disease, hospitalization, mortality

Hanna Sandelowsky,1– 3 Christer Janson,4 Fredrik Wiklund,5 Gunilla Telg,6 Sofie de Fine Licht,6 Björn Ställberg7 1Department of Medicine, Solna, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 2Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; 3Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden; 4Department of Medical Sciences: Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 5Statisticon AB, Uppsala, Sweden; 6AstraZeneca Nordic, Stockholm, Sweden; 7Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenCorrespondence: Hanna Sandelowsky, Department of Medicine, Solna, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Tel +46738902565, Email hannasandelowsky@gmail.comObjective: The Swedish guidelines recommend that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on maintenance treatment are monitored annually, and within six weeks after an exacerbation. We describe the patterns of COPD-related visits in Sweden, both regular follow-up and post-exacerbation visits.Methods: Patients (> 40 years) with a first-time COPD diagnosis between 2006 and 2017 were identified in primary care medical records and linked to hospital contacts and administered drug data. The index date was defined as the first collection of inhaled COPD maintenance treatment after the diagnosis. Regular COPD visits within 15-months after the index, and post-exacerbation visits for COPD within six weeks and 15-months after an exacerbation were estimated using the cumulative incidence function adjusted for competing risk. Visits without a ICD code for COPD were not included in the analyses.Results: A total of 19,857 patients (mean age 69 years, 57% females) were included. The overall probability of having a regular follow-up visit for COPD within 15 months post-index was 39.1%. In total, 15,095 (76%) patients experienced at least one COPD exacerbation during the observation period. Among them, the probability of having a post-exacerbation visit was 7.0% within six weeks and 29.7% within 15-months. Patients without a regular COPD follow-up visit claimed significantly more oral corticosteroids (25.6% vs 15.6%), more respiratory antibiotics (39.1% vs 23.1%), and less maintenance treatment (10.9% vs 16.5%).Conclusion: Only 39% of COPD patients attended a regular follow-up visit within 15-months from the COPD diagnosis and one-third had a post-exacerbation visit. The adherence to guideline recommendations need to be improved.Keywords: COPD, follow-up visit, exacerbation, guidelines

Lena Lundh,1,2 Kjell Larsson,3 Anders Lindén,4,5 Scott Montgomery,6– 8 Lena Palmberg,3 Hanna Sandelowsky1,2,7 1Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden; 2Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden; 3Division of Integrative Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 4Division for Lung and Airway Research, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 5Karolinska Severe COPD Center, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden; 6Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; 7Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 8Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UKCorrespondence: Hanna Sandelowsky, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Stockholm, SE-171 76, Sweden, Tel +46738902565, Email hanna.sandelowsky@ki.seBackground: To facilitate effective personalized medicine, primary health care needs better methods of assessing and monitoring chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Aim: This cohort study aims to investigate how biomarkers relate to clinical characteristics and COPD patients’ subjective needs over time.Methods: Patients (n=750) in different COPD severity according to the GOLD criteria and age- and sex-matched controls (n=750) will be recruited over a period of 5 years from 15 primary health care centers in Region Stockholm, Sweden, and followed for 10 years in the first instance. Data on patients’ subjective needs will be collected via telephone/email, data on clinical/physiological variables (eg, symptoms, exacerbations, comorbidities, medications, smoking habits, lung function) from existing databases that are based on medical records, and data on biomarkers via repeated blood sampling. Quantitative and qualitative methods will be used. Initial results are expected after 2 years (feasibility test), and a larger body of evidence after 5 years.Discussion: The study is expected to provide definitive and clinically useful scientific evidence about how biomarkers relate to clinical variables and patients’ subjective needs. This new evidence will facilitate accurate, and personalized COPD management by the use of valid biomarkers. It will provide useful tools for primary care professionals and may facilitate optimal self-management.Keywords: airway inflammation, COPD, biomarkers, cohort, patients’ needs, personalized medicine, primary care

Hanna Sandelowsky,1– 3 Björn Ställberg,4 Fredrik Wiklund,5 Gunilla Telg,6 Sofie de Fine Licht,6 Christer Janson7 1Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Solna, Sweden; 2Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Solna, Sweden; 3Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Sweden; 4Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 5Statisticon AB, Uppsala, Sweden; 6AstraZeneca Nordic, Södertälje, Sweden; 7Department of Medical Sciences: Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenCorrespondence: Hanna Sandelowsky, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Solna, Sweden, Tel +46738902565, Email hanna.sandelowsky@ki.seBackground: Symptom control has not improved in Swedish asthma patients during the last two decades. Guidelines recommend annual reviews for asthma patients treated with maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). We aimed to describe how visit patterns in an ICS-treated asthma population in Sweden were related to applicable asthma guidelines.Methods: Swedish electronic health data for incident asthma patients, ≥ 18 years, with at least one ICS collection (index date) between 2006 and 2017 were included. Exacerbations were defined as hospitalizations, emergency visits, or collection of oral corticosteroids (OCS). Probability of an asthma-related regular follow-up visit and probability of a follow-up visit after an exacerbation, both within 15 months, were estimated using the cumulative incidence function, time-to-event analysis, and incident rate ratios.Results: In 51,349 asthma patients (mean age 47.6 years, 63% females), 17,573 had a regular asthma visit in primary or secondary care within 15 months after the index, yielding an overall probability of a visit of 37.4%. Patients with a follow-up visit had higher ICS collection and lower OCS collection than patients without regular visits. Among 22,097 patients with acute exacerbations, the probability of a visit within 15 months after an exacerbation was 31.0%. The probability of having a visit increased during the study period.Conclusion: Only one-third of ICS-treated asthma patients, regardless of asthma severity, had a regular or post-exacerbation follow-up visit within a 15-month period. The consequences of this lack of adherence to guidelines need further evaluation to secure optimal asthma management.Keywords: asthma, disease management, follow-up visit, exacerbation

Abstract Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an underdiagnosed cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Prevalence of COPD has been shown to be highly associated with positive smoking history and increasing age. Spirometry is the method used for diagnosing COPD. However, identifying patients at risk of COPD to undergo spirometry tests has been challenging. Therefore, there is a need for new cost-effective and feasible diagnostic screening procedures for use in primary care centers. Our aim was to describe the prevalence and severity of undiagnosed COPD in a group of patients with respiratory infections attending urgent primary care, and to identify those variables in patients' history that could be used to detect the disease. Methods Patients of 40-75 years (n = 138) attending urgent primary care center with acute respiratory tract infection, positive smoking history and no previously known pulmonary disease underwent pre- and post bronchodilator spirometry testing four to five weeks after the acute infection. Prevalence and severity of COPD were estimated following the Global Initiative for COPD (GOLD) criteria. Variables such as sex, age, current smoking status, smoking intensity (pack years) and type of infection diagnosis were assessed for possible associations with COPD. Results The prevalence of previously undiagnosed COPD in our study group was 27%, of which 45% were in stage 1 (FEV1 ≥ 80% of predicted), 53% in stage 2 (50 ≤ FEV1 < 80% of predicted), 3% in stage 3 (30 ≤ FEV1 < 50% of predicted) and 0% in stage 4 (FEV1 < 30% of predicted). We found a significant association between COPD and age ≥ 55 (OR = 10.9 [95% CI 3.8-30.1]) and between COPD and smoking intensity (pack years > 20) (OR = 3.2 [95% CI 1.2-8.5]). Sex, current smoking status and type of infection diagnosis were not shown to be significantly associated with COPD. Conclusion A middle-aged or older patient with any type of common respiratory tract infection, positive smoking history and no previously known pulmonary disease has an increased likelihood of having underlying COPD. These patients should be offered spirometry testing for diagnosis of COPD.

Introduction: The study aimed to compare prevalence of comorbid allergic manifestations and rhinitis, allergy testing and associations with patient-related outcomes in patients with asthma and COPD., Methods: Cross-sectional study of randomly selected Swedish patients with a doctor's diagnosis of asthma ( n  = 1291) or COPD ( n  = 1329). Self-completion questionnaires from 2014 provided data on demographics, rhinitis, allergic symptoms at exposure to pollen or furry pets, exacerbations, self-assessed severity of disease and scores from the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and records were reviewed for allergy tests., Results: Allergic manifestations were more common in asthma (75%) compared with COPD (38%). Rhinitis was reported in 70% of asthma and 58% of COPD patients. Allergy tests had been performed during the previous decade in 28% of patients with asthma and in 8% of patients with COPD.In patients with asthma; comorbid allergy and rhinitis were both independently associated with increased risk for poor asthma symptom control (ACT < 20) (OR [95% CI] 1.41 [1.05 to 1.87] and 2.13 [1.60 to 2.83]), exacerbations (1.58 [1.15 to 2.17] and 1.38 [1.02 to 1.86]), and self-assessed moderate/severe disease (1.64 [1.22 to 2.18] and 1.75 [1.33 to 2.30]). In patients with COPD, comorbid allergy and rhinitis were both independently associated with increased risk for low health status (CAT ≥ 10) (OR [95% CI] 1.46 [1.20 to 1.95] and 2.59 [1.97 to 3.41]) respectively, with exacerbations during the previous six months (1.91 [1.49 to 2.45] and 1.57 [1.23 to 2.01]), and with self-assessed moderate/severe disease (1.70 [1.31 to 2.22] and 2.13 [1.66 to 2.74])., Conclusion: Allergic manifestations and rhinitis are more common in asthma than COPD but associated with worse outcomes in both diseases. This highlights the importance of examining and treating comorbid allergy and rhinitis, not only in asthma but also in COPD., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s)., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.)

Objective: Despite access to effective therapies many asthma patients still do not have well-controlled disease. This is possibly related to underuse of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and overuse of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA). Our aim was to investigate longitudinal trends and associated factors in asthma treatment., Methods: Two separate cohorts of adults with physician-diagnosed asthma were randomly selected from 14 hospitals and 56 primary health centers in Sweden in 2005 ( n  = 1182) and 2015 ( n  = 1225). Information about symptoms, maintenance treatment, and use of rescue medication was collected by questionnaires. Associations between treatment and sex, age, smoking, education, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, allergic asthma, and symptom control were analyzed using Pearson's chi 2 -test. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression., Results: Maintenance treatment with ICS together with long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) and/or montelukast increased from 39.2% to 44.2% ( p  = 0.012). The use of ICS + LABA as-needed increased (11.1-18.9%, p  < 0.001), while SABA use decreased (46.4- 41.8%, p  = 0.023). Regular treatment with ICS did not change notably (54.2-57.2%, p  = 0.14). Older age, former smoking, and poor symptom control were related to treatment with ICS + LABA/montelukast. In 2015, 22.7% reported daily use of SABA. A higher step of maintenance treatment, older age, obesity, shorter education, current smoking, allergic asthma, low or very high physical activity, and a history of exacerbations were associated with daily SABA use., Conclusions: The use of ICS + LABA both for maintenance treatment and symptom relief has increased over time. Despite this, the problem of low use of ICS and high use of SABA remains.

Objective: Patient education based on the patient's individual needs and circumstances is known to be associated with positive changes in clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to assess the levels of patients' subjective needs for information about COPD before and after their general practitioners had taken part in a COPD education., Design: A secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial., Setting: 22 PHCCs in Stockholm, Sweden., Subjects: Randomly selected primary care patients with COPD in GOLD stages 2 and 3 ( n  = 293)., Outcome Measures: Scores in the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ) at baseline and 18 months, spirometry results, and self-reported, descriptive patient data., Results: GPs' improved skills in COPD did not affect patients' self-management skills over time. In general, patients' information needs remained great in issues concerning diet, exercise and self-management. However, 43% of the patients reported reduced and 57% increased or unchanged information needs, over time. Reduced information needs were mainly associated with a high level of information needs at baseline (OR = 3.17 [95% CI 1.93-5.23], p  < .01) and establishing contact with a physiotherapist (OR = 2.26 [95% CI 1.05-4.86], p  = .038). Patients in a mild or stable phase of COPD with no recent exacerbations reported greater needs than those with unstable, deteriorated COPD., Conclusion: Patients' information needs are substantial in most areas of self-management of COPD, and seem to covary with the patient's current clinical status. Care providers should thus continuously be vigilant about offering all patients with COPD support and education., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, 10 August 2014, Identifier NCT02213809.

The COVID-19 pandemic mandated a substantial switch in primary health care delivery from an in-person to a mainly remote telephone or video service. As the COVID-19 pandemic approaches its third year, limited progress appears to have been made in terms of policy development around consultation methods for the post-acute phase of the pandemic. In September 2020, the International Primary Care Respiratory Group convened a global panel of primary care clinicians - including family physicians, paediatricians, pharmacists, academics and patients - to consider the policy and health management implications of the move to remote consultations in the primary care setting. The group gave special consideration to how and how far remote consultations should be integrated into routine primary health care delivery. Remote consultations can be a useful alternative to in-person consultations in primary care not only in situations where there is a need for viral infection control but also for the routine delivery of chronic disease management. However, they may not be more time efficient for the clinician, and they can add to the workload and work-related stress for primary care practitioners if they remain the dominant consultation mode. Remote consultations are also less appropriate than in-person consultations for new disease diagnosis, dealing with multiple issues and providing complex care. Ensuring health care professionals have the appropriate skill set to effectively deliver remote consultations, administrative and/or IT support and appropriate reimbursement will be key to achieving optimal integration of remote consultations into routine clinical practice. Addressing digital access and digital literacy issues at a societal level will also be essential to ensure individuals have fair and equitable access to the internet and sufficient security for exchange of personal and health-related data.

Background: Short-acting β 2 -agonist (SABA) overuse has been associated with an increased risk of exacerbations in asthma; however, less is known about SABA use in COPD. Our aim was to describe SABA use and investigate potential associations between high SABA use and the risk of future exacerbations and mortality in COPD., Methods: This observational study identified COPD patients in primary care medical records in Sweden. Data were linked to the National Patient Registry, the Prescribed Drug Registry and the Cause of Death Registry. The index date was 12 months after the date of COPD diagnosis. During a 12-month prior to index baseline period, information on SABA use was collected. Patients were followed with respect to exacerbations and mortality for 12 months post index., Results: Of the 19 794 COPD patients included (mean age 69.1 years, 53.3% females), 15.5% and 7.0% had collected ≥3 or ≥6 SABA canisters during the baseline period, respectively. A higher level of SABA use (≥6 canisters) was independently associated with a higher risk of both moderate and severe exacerbations (hazard ratio (HR) 1.28 (95% CI 1.17‒1.40) and 1.76 (95% CI 1.50‒2.06), respectively) during follow-up. In total, 673 (3.4%) patients died during the 12-month follow-up period. An independent association was found between high SABA use and overall mortality (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.07‒2.39). This association, however, was not found in patients using inhaled corticosteroids as maintenance treatment., Conclusion: In COPD patients in Sweden, high SABA use is relatively common and associated with a higher risk of exacerbations and all-cause mortality., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C. Janson has received payments for educational activities from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Teva, and has served on advisory boards arranged by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Teva. F. Wiklund is employed at Statisticon of which AstraZeneca is a client. Conflict of interest: G. Telg and G. Stratelis are employed by AstraZeneca. H. Sandelowsky has received honoraria for educational activities from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, and TEVA, an unrestricted research grant from AstraZeneca, and has served on advisory boards arranged by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Chiesi, and GlaxoSmithKline., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Spirometry should be used to confirm a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This test is not always performed, leading to possible misdiagnosis. We investigated whether the proportion of patients with diagnostic spirometry has increased over time as well as factors associated with omitted or incorrectly interpreted spirometry. Data from medical reviews and a questionnaire from primary and secondary care patients with a doctors' diagnosis of COPD between 2004 and 2010 were collected. Data were compared with a COPD cohort diagnosed between 2000 and 2003. Among 703 patients with a first diagnosis of COPD between 2004 and 2010, 88% had a diagnostic spirometry, compared with 59% (p < 0.001) in the previous cohort. Factors associated with not having diagnostic spirometry were current smoking (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.36-3.60), low educational level (OR 1.81; 1.09-3.02) and management in primary care (OR 2.28; 1.02-5.14). The correct interpretation of spirometry results increased (75% vs 82%; p = 0.010). Among patients with a repeated spirometry, 94% had a persistent FEV 1 /FVC or FEV 1 /VC ratio <0.70., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The aim of this study was to describe factors associated with having COPD regularly reviewed in primary care by a nurse or physician and assess whether there was de-prioritisation for COPD in multimorbid patients. We defined de-prioritisation as not having at least one check-up by a physician during a two-year period. Among 713 COPD patients in the Swedish PRAXIS study, 473 (66%) had at least one check-up during the study period (ending in 2014). Patients with check-ups were more likely to have three or more comorbid conditions (31.9% vs. 24.6%) and exacerbations (35.1% vs. 21.7%) than those without. Compared with those without comorbidity, those with three or more diagnoses had increased relative risk ratios (and 95% CI) for consultations discussing COPD with only a physician (5.63 (2.68-11.79)), COPD-nurse only (1.67 (0.83-3.37)) or both (2.11 (1.09-4.06)). COPD patients received more frequent check-ups considering COPD if they had comorbidity or a history of exacerbations. We found no evidence of de-prioritisation for COPD in multimorbid patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: The aim was to investigate if menstruation and use of exogenous sex hormones influence self-reported asthma related quality of life (QoL) and asthma control., Methods: The study is based on two asthma cohorts randomly selected in primary and secondary care. A total of 622 female patients 18-65 years were included and classified as premenopausal ≤ 46 years ( n  = 338) and peri/postmenopausal 47-65 years ( n  = 284). Questionnaire data from 2012 and 2014 with demographics, asthma related issues and sex hormone status. Outcome measures were Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ) and asthma control including Asthma Control Test (ACT) and exacerbations last six months., Results: Premenopausal women with menstruation related asthma worsening, perimenstrual asthma (PMA) (9%), had a clinically relevant lower Mini-AQLQ mean score 4.9 vs. 5.8 ( p  < 0.001), lower asthma control with ACT score < 20, 72% vs. 28% ( p  < 0.001) and higher exacerbation frequency 44% vs. 20% ( p  = 0.004) compared with women without PMA. Women with irregular menstruation had higher exacerbation frequency than women with regular menstruation ( p  = 0.023). Hormonal contraceptives had no impact on QoL and asthma control. Peri/postmenopausal women with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) had a clinically relevant lower Mini-AQLQ mean score compared to those without MHT, 4.9 vs 5.4 ( p  < 0.001), but no differences in asthma control., Conclusion: Women with PMA had lower QoL and more uncontrolled asthma than women without PMA. Peri/postmenopausal women with MHT had lower QoL than women without MHT. Individual clinical management of women with asthma may benefit from information about their sex hormone status.

Objective: To investigate whether one additional educational session about inhaler use, delivered to patients with COPD in primary healthcare, could affect the patients' skills in inhaler use. Specifically, to study the effects on errors related to handling the device, to inhalation technique, and to both., Methods: This nonrandomized controlled clinical trial included 64 patients who used devices and made errors. COPD nurses assessed inhaler use using a checklist and educated patients. Intervention group received one additional educational session after two weeks., Results: At baseline, patients in the IG had more devices (n = 2,1) compared to patients in the CG (n = 1,6) (p = 0.003). No other statistically significant differences were seen at baseline. At follow-up, intervention group showed a lower proportion of patients who made errors related to handling the device (p = 0.006). No differences were seen in the other categories., Conclusion: One additional educational session in inhaler use for patients with COPD was effective in reducing the proportion of patients making errors related to handling of their devices., Practice Implications: Categorization of errors might help healthcare professionals to assess the suitability of patients' devices, tailor patient education, and thus improve patient health., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Asthma severity can be estimated as the level of medication needed to achieve asthma control or by the patient's subjective assessment. Factors associated with self-assessed asthma severity are still incompletely explored., Aim: The aim was to study factors associated with self-assessed moderate or severe asthma., Method: In total, 1828 randomly selected asthma patients from primary (69%) and secondary (31%) care, completed a questionnaire including items about patient characteristics, comorbidity, the Asthma Control Test (ACT), emergency care visits and a scale for self-assessed asthma severity. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations with the dependent variable, self-assessed moderate or severe asthma in the entire study population and stratified by sex., Results: Of the patients, 883 (45%) reported having moderate or severe asthma. Factors independently associated with self-assessed moderate or severe asthma were age >60 years (OR [95% CI] 1.98 [1.37-2.85]), allergic rhino-conjunctivitis (1.43 [1.05-1.95]), sinusitis (1.45 [1.09-1.93]), poor asthma control as measured by ACT <20 (5.64 [4.45-7.16]) and emergency care visits the previous year (2.52 [1.90-3.34]). Lower level of education was associated with self-assessed moderate/severe asthma in women (1.16 [1.05-2.43]) but not in men (0.90 [0.65-1.25]), p for interaction = .012., Conclusion: Poor asthma control, allergic rhino-conjunctivitis, recent sinusitis and older age were independently associated with self-assessed moderate or severe asthma. Important implications are that comorbid conditions of the upper airways should always be considered as part of asthma management, and that elderly patients may need extra attention.

Approximately 500 000 individuals in Sweden have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Co-morbid, especially cardiovascular, conditions are common in COPD and globally COPD is the third most common cause of mortality. Mortality in COPD is driven by dyspnea, exacerbations and comorbidities and is reduced by smoking cessation and lung rehabilitation. Also, pharmacological treatment, in particular inhaled corticosteroids, reduces mortality in COPD. The reduction in mortality that can be achieved by treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in combinations with long-acting bronchodilators is of the same order of magnitude as the effect on mortality by treatment of hyperlipidemia and hypertension.

A gap exists between guidelines and real-world clinical practice for the management and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although this has narrowed in the last decade, there is room for improvement in detection rates, treatment choices and disease monitoring. In practical terms, primary care practitioners need to become aware of the huge impact of COPD on patients, have non-judgemental views of smoking and of COPD as a chronic disease, use a holistic consultation approach and actively motivate patients to adhere to treatment.This article is based on discussions at a virtual meeting of leading Nordic experts in COPD (the authors) who were developing an educational programme for COPD primary care in the Nordic region. The article aims to describe the diagnosis and lifelong management cycle of COPD, with a strong focus on providing a hands-on, practical approach for medical professionals to optimise patient outcomes in COPD primary care., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

This study aimed to compare patient outcomes following case method learning and traditional lectures as methods for continuing medical education (CME) about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for general practitioners (GPs) in Sweden. In a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial, COPD patients (n = 425; case method group n = 209, traditional lectures group n = 216) from 24 primary health care centers replied to questionnaires prior to and 18 months after a 2 × 2-h CME was given to GPs (n = 255). We measured changes in the scores of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), symptoms, needs for disease information, exacerbations, smoking, and use of pulmonary rehabilitation. The changes over time were similar for both CME methods. Patients who had used pulmonary rehabilitation increased from 13.2 to 17.8% (P = 0.04), and prevalence of smoking decreased from 28.9 to 25.1% (P = 0.003). In conclusion, neither of the used CME methods was superior than the other regarding patient outcomes. CME's primary value may lay in improving GPs' adherence to guidelines, which should lead to long-term positive changes in patient health.

Aims and Objective: To investigate the effects on the quality of care of the Patient Report Informing Self-Management Support (PRISMS) form compared with usual care among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) consulting a COPD nurse in primary health care., Background: Patients with COPD experience symptoms affecting their everyday lives, and there is a need for interventions in self-management support. The delivery of chronic care in an organised, structured and planned manner can lead to more productive relationships between professionals and patients., Design: A multicentre randomised controlled trial with a post-test design, according to the CONSORT checklist, in one intervention group (n = 94) and one control group (n = 108)., Methods: In addition to usual care, the intervention group (n = 94) completed the PRISMS form to indicate areas where they wanted self-management support before the consultation with the COPD nurse. This form comprises 17 items that patients with COPD commonly experience as problems. The control group received usual care (n = 108). The primary outcome was patients' satisfaction with quality of care, assessed using the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire. Means and (SD) are presented where applicable. Differences between the intervention and control group were analysed with Student's t test for independent groups for interval data, and the Mann-Whitney U test for ordinal data., Results: Participants in the intervention group were more satisfied with the QPP domains "personal attention," regarding both "perceived reality" (p = .021) and "subjective importance" (p = .012). The PRISMS form revealed "shortness of breath" as the most commonly experienced problem and the issue most desired to discuss., Conclusion: The PRISMS form improved patient satisfaction with quality of care regarding personal attention, which is an important factor in patient participation and improving relationships and communication., Relevance to Clinical Practice: The PRISMS form can be a useful tool in improving person-centred care when delivering self-management support., Register Id: 192691 at http://www.researchweb.org/is/en/sverige/project/192691., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The aim of this study was to identify asthma phenotypes through cluster analysis. Cluster analysis was performed using self-reported characteristics from a cohort of 1291 Swedish asthma patients. Disease burden was measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), the mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), exacerbation frequency and asthma severity. Validation was performed in 748 individuals from the same geographical region. Three clusters; early onset predominantly female, adult onset predominantly female and adult onset predominantly male, were identified. Early onset predominantly female asthma had a higher burden of disease, the highest exacerbation frequency and use of inhaled corticosteroids. Adult onset predominantly male asthma had the highest mean score of ACT and mini-AQLQ, the lowest exacerbation frequency and higher proportion of subjects with mild asthma. These clusters, based on information from clinical questionnaire data, might be useful in primary care settings where the access to spirometry and biomarkers is limited.

Objective: In Sweden, patients with chronic conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), often receive education at specialized nurse-led clinics at primary health care centers (PHCCs). Identifying patients' needs for information about COPD is the key to individualized care. This study aimed to assess self-reported needs for information about COPD in primary care patients with either moderate (GOLD 2) or severe (GOLD 3) COPD and identify patient characteristics and exacerbation patterns associated with the findings. Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: Twenty-four PHCCs in Stockholm, Sweden. Subjects: Randomly selected primary care patients with COPD in GOLD stages 2 and 3 ( n  = 542). Main outcome measures: The Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ) was used to assess perceived information needs. Spirometry results and descriptive, self-reported data on patient factors such as exacerbation history, treatment, smoking, weight/height, comorbidities, health care contacts, education and symptoms were collected. Results: Overall, the greatest reported needs were for information about self-management and diet. GOLD 2 patients (68%) expressed greater needs for information than GOLD 3 patients (32%). We found significant associations between high information needs and patient-related factors such as 'No assigned GP' (OR = 4.32 [95% CI 2.65-7.05]) and 'No contact with COPD nurse in the past 12 months' (OR = 1.83 [95% CI 1.19-2.81]). Conclusion: COPD patients felt they knew too little about self-management of their disease. Low information needs were strongly associated with continuity in patient-GP consultations and moderately associated with contact with a COPD nurse. These associations were strongest in patients with moderate COPD. Key points: As patients with COPD often have multimorbidity, identifying patients' needs for information about COPD is essential to providing individualized patient education and care. In this study of 542 patients from 24 Swedish primary care centers, we found that:Patients with COPD, particularly those with moderate airflow limitation (i.e. GOLD 2) felt they needed more information about COPD than currently provided by health care professionals in primary care.Low information needs were strongly associated with continuity in patient-GP consultations and moderately associated with contact with a COPD nurse. GPs' part in COPD patient education should not be overlooked, as individualized COPD care relies on GPs' expertise in managing patients with multimorbidity.

Aim: The aim of this study was to describe inhaler use in primary health care patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to categorize these patients into those making errors related to devices, those making errors related to inhalation technique and those making errors related to both., Design: Observational study., Methods: COPD nurses used a checklist to assess the use of inhalers by patients with spirometry-verified COPD ( N  = 183) from primary healthcare centres. The STROBE checklist has been used., Results: The mean age of the patients was 71 ( SD 9) years. Almost half of them (45%) made at least one error; of these, 50% made errors related to devices, 31% made errors related to inhalation technique and 19% made errors related both to devices and to inhalation technique., Competing Interests: AL has received honoraria for educational activities and lectures from Teva and has served on advisory board arranged by GSK. KL has received payments for educational activities and lectures from Novartis, AstraZeneca, TEVA, Chiesi and Boehringer Ingelheim and participated on advisory boards with Boehringer Ingelheim and GlaxoSmith Kline. BS has received honoraria for educational activities and lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Meda, Novartis, and Teva, and has served on advisory boards arranged by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Meda, GSK, Teva, and Boehringer Ingelheim. HS has received honoraria for educational activities from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Teva, and an unrestricted research grant from AstraZeneca. ABZ has received honoraria for educational activities and lectures from AstraZeneca. EW, KT, MA, LL and ETA have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2019 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To study the effects of continuing medical education (CME) about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for general practitioners (GPs) by comparing two commonly used CME methods with each other and no CME (reference group)., Design: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with primary healthcare centres (PHCCs) as units of randomisation., Setting, Participants and Interventions: 24 PHCCs in Stockholm County, Sweden, were randomised into two CME intervention arms: case method learning (CM) (n=12) and traditional lectures (TL) (n=12). A reference group without CME (n=11) was recruited separately. GPs (n=255) participated in the study arm to which their PHCC was allocated: CM, n=87; TL, n=93; and reference, n=75. Two 2-hour CME seminars were given in a period of 3 months., Primary Outcome Measures: Changes in scores between baseline and 12 months on a 13-item questionnaire about evidence-based COPD management (0-2 points/question, maximum total score 26 points)., Results: 133 (52%) GPs completed the questionnaire both at baseline and 12 months. Both CM and TL resulted in small yet significantly higher total scores at 12 months than at baseline (CM, 10.34 vs 11.44; TL, 10.21 vs 10.91; p<0.05); there were few significant differences between these CME methods. At both baseline and 12 months, all three groups' scores were generally high on questions about smoking cessation support and low on those that measured spirometry interpretation skills, interprofessional care and management of multimorbidity., Conclusions: Neither short CM nor short TL CME sessions substantially improve GPs' skills in managing COPD. It is justified to challenge the use of these common CME methods as a strategy for improving GPs' level of knowledge about management of COPD and other complex chronic diseases characterised by multimorbidity., Trial Registration Number: NCT02213809; Results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: HS has received honoraria for educational activities from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and TEVA and an unrestricted research grant from AstraZeneca. AN has received compensation for educational activities from AstraZeneca and SM from Novartis. BS has received honoraria for educational activities and lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Meda, Novartis, and TEVA and has served on advisory boards arranged by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Meda, TEVA, GlaxoSmithKline, and Boehringer Ingelheim., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of suffering and death. Evidence-based management of COPD by general practitioners (GPs) is crucial for decreasing the impact of the disease. Efficient strategies include early diagnosis, smoking cessation and multimodal treatment., Aim: To describe knowledge about and skills for managing COPD in GPs in Sweden., Methods: Prior to COPD education (the PRIMAIR Study), GPs at primary health care centers (PHCCs) in Stockholm replied to 13 written, patient-case based, multiple choice and free-text questions about COPD. Their knowledge and practical management skills were assessed by assigned points that were analyzed with non-parametric tests., Results: Overall, 250 GPs at 34 PHCCs replied (89% response rate). Total mean score was 9.9 (maximum 26). Scores were highest on 'management of smoking cessation', 'follow-up after exacerbation' and 'diagnostic procedures'. Spirometry was used frequently, although interpretation skills were suboptimal. 'Management of maintenance therapy', 'management of multimorbidity' and 'interprofessional cooperation' had mediocre scores. Scores were unrelated to whether there was a nurse-led asthma/COPD clinic at the PHCC., Conclusions: Swedish GPs' knowledge of COPD and adherence to current guidelines seem insufficient. A nurse-led asthma/COPD clinic at the PHCC does not correlate with sufficient COPD skills in the GPs. The relevance of this study to participants' actual clinical practice and usefulness of easy-to-access clinical guides are interesting topics for future investigation. To identify problem areas, we suggest using questionnaires prior to educational interventions. Key Points General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in providing evidence-based care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are treated in primary care. Swedish GPs' knowledge about COPD and adherence to current guidelines seem insufficient. Areas in greatest need of improvement are spirometry interpretation, management of maintenance therapy, management of multimorbidity in patients with COPD and interprofessional cooperation.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is often undiagnosed and insufficiently managed. Effective forms of continuing medical education (CME) for primary care physicians (PCPs) are necessary to ensure the implementation of guidelines in clinical practice and, thus, improve patients' health., Methods: In this study, we will measure the effects of CME by Case Method and compare them against those of traditional lectures and no CME at all through an unblinded, cluster randomised controlled trial (CRCT). Thirty-three primary health care centres (PHCCs) in Stockholm, Sweden, with a total of 180 PCPs will be involved. Twenty-two primary PHCCs, will be cluster-randomised into: an intervention group who will receive CME by Case Method (n = 11) and a control group who will receive traditional lectures (n = 11). The remaining PHCCs (n = 11) will be a reference group and will receive no CME. From the intervention and control groups, 460 randomly selected patients with COPD in GOLD stages 2 and 3 will participate, while no patients will be recruited from the reference group. For the patients, smoking status, actual treatment and urgent visits to a health provider due to airway problems will be registered. For the PCPs, professional competence (i.e. knowledge and management skills) in COPD, will be measured using a questionnaire based on current guidelines and guideline implementation problems in clinical practice which has previously been described by the authors. Data will be collected at baseline and at follow-up, which will be after 1.5 years for the patients, and 1 year for the PCPs. Statistical methods for individual-level and cluster-level analyses will be used., Discussion: COPD is considered a particularly complex clinical challenge involving managing multimorbidity, symptom adaptation, and lifestyle problematisation. Case Method in CME for PCPs may contribute to a better understanding of the impact of COPD on patients' lives and, thus, improve their management of it. The present study is expected to contribute scientific knowledge about indicators for an effective CME in COPD that is tailor-made to primary care physicians., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02213809 . Registered on 10 August 2014. Protocol version: Issue date: May 2014.

Background: To overcome the gap between existing knowledge and the application of this knowledge in practice, a three-part continuing educational model for primary health care professionals (ConPrim) was developed. It includes a web-based program, a practical exercise and a case seminar., Aim: To evaluate professionals' perceptions of the design, pedagogy and adaptation to primary health care of the ConPrim continuing educational model as applied in a subject-specific intervention., Methods: A total of 67 professionals (nurses and physicians) completed a computer-based questionnaire evaluating the model's design, pedagogy and adaptation to primary health care one week after the intervention. Descriptive statistics were used., Results: Over 90% found the design of the web-based program and case seminar attractive; 86% found the design of the practical exercise attractive. The professionals agreed that the time spent on two of the three parts was acceptable. The exception was the practical exercise: 32% did not fully agree. Approximately 90% agreed that the contents of all parts were relevant to their work and promoted interactive and interprofessional learning. In response to the statements about the intervention as whole, approximately 90% agreed that the intervention was suitable to primary health care, that it had increased their competence in the subject area, and that they would be able to use what they had learned in their work., Conclusions: ConPrim is a promising model for continuing educational interventions in primary health care. However, the time spent on the practical exercise should be adjusted and the instructions for the exercise clarified. ConPrim should be tested in other subject-specific interventions and its influence on clinical practice should be evaluated., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify factors that hinder discussions regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) between primary care physicians (PCPs) and their patients in Sweden., Setting: Primary health care centres (PHCCs) in Stockholm, Sweden., Subjects: A total of 59 PCPs., Design: Semi-structured individual and focus-group interviews between 2012 and 2014. Data were analysed inspired by grounded theory methods (GTM)., Results: Time-pressured patient-doctor consultations lead to deprioritization of COPD. During unscheduled visits, deprioritization resulted from focusing only on acute health concerns, while during routine care visits, COPD was deprioritized in multi-morbid patients. The reasons PCPs gave for deprioritizing COPD are: "Not becoming aware of COPD", "Not becoming concerned due to clinical features", "Insufficient local routines for COPD care", "Negative personal attitudes and views about COPD", "Managing diagnoses one at a time", and "Perceiving a patient's motivation as low''., Conclusions: De-prioritization of COPD was discovered during PCP consultations and several factors were identified associated with time constraints and multi-morbidity. A holistic consultation approach is suggested, plus extended consultation time for multi-morbid patients, and better documentation and local routines., Key Points: Under-diagnosis and insufficient management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common in primary health care. A patient-doctor consultation offers a key opportunity to identify and provide COPD care. Time pressure, due to either high number of patients or multi-morbidity, leads to omission or deprioritization of COPD during consultation. Deprioritization occurs due to lack of awareness, concern, and local routines, negative personal views, non-holistic consultation approach, and low patient motivation. Better local routines, extended consultation time, and a holistic approach are needed when managing multi-morbid patients with COPD.