1. The default in different procedural models of the Middle Ages, parallel, variable and progress of the legal concept
- Author
-
Pérez Ragone,Álvaro J
- Subjects
Sanciones intra y extraprocesales ,Intra and extra procedural sanctions ,Contumacia ,Default ,Proceso civil medieval ,Rebeldía ,Medieval civil process - Abstract
El estudio examina la regulación de la rebeldía o contumacia en cuatro modelos procesales medievales; y desarrolla la evolución y las variables a las que ellos recurrieron para perfilar la figura y los mecanismos para suplir la ausencia de una de las partes. En aquellos que partían del consenso y la consecuente necesidad de la presencia de ambas partes (los modelos anglo-sajón y germano en sus génesis) priman las medidas coercitivas, cuando no punitivas contra el rebelde, pues se necesitaba su presencia real. El problema es que si ello no era posible, el proceso solo se podía desarrollar en torno a consecuencias extraprocesales (coerción, sanción punitiva penal o civil), pero no lograba arribar a la sentencia de mérito, mientras aquellas medidas no fueran fructíferas. Así se evolucionó lentamente hacia la posibilidad de fallar en ausencia de una de las partes, e incluso a la de producir alteraciones patrimoniales en rebeldía, especialmente en las acciones reales, a través de ficciones como la confesión y el reconocimiento tácito. This study examines the regulation of the in Default Judgements Medieval procedural models; and develops the progress and the variables to which they resorted to profile the legal concept and the mechanisms to replace the absence of one of the parties. From those who started from consensus and the consequential need of the presence of both parties (the Anglo-Saxons and Germanic models in their beginnings) the restrictive measures take priority, when they are not punitive against the person in contempt, as their real presence was required. The problem is that if that was not possible, the process could only develop based on the out-of-process consequences (coercion, criminal or civil punitive sanction), but did not allow to get to the merit ruling, while those measures did not become fruitful. In this way, it slowly progressed towards the possibility of ruling in the absence of one of the parties, and even to carry out patrimony alterations in contempt, especially in real actions, by means of fictions as confession and tacit acknowledgement.
- Published
- 2008