1. Sensitivity of cytology in liver tumor biopsy and its significance in the prompt clinical diagnosis of non‐hepatocellular carcinoma
- Author
-
Tasuku Nakabori, Yutaro Abe, Sena Higashi, Kaori Mukai, Azusa Shingetsu, Sanako Nishimura, Sayoko Tsuzaki, Ayumi Ryu, Satoshi Tanada, Shigenori Nagata, Keiichiro Honma, and Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
- Subjects
malignancy detection ,minimally invasive technique ,rapid on‐site evaluation ,tumor histology ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background Cytology is a fast and simple modality for identifying malignancies and tumor histology. In this study, we analyzed the sensitivity of cytology for liver tumor biopsy and evaluated its potential for prompt clinical diagnosis. Methods This retrospective study included patients who had concurrently undergone conventional cytology, on‐site cytology, and histopathology for ultrasound‐guided liver tumor biopsies. In the case of malignant tumors, malignancy was first diagnosed, then preliminary clinical diagnosis was established using histology based on cytology and clinical information, followed by histopathological diagnosis. Sensitivity of malignancy detection was evaluated by comparison with histopathological diagnosis. Results Of the 191 tumors, 164 (85.9%) were malignant. The sensitivity of conventional cytology for malignancy detection was 97.6%. The sensitivity of non‐hepatocellular carcinoma (non‐HCC) (99.3%) detection was higher than that of the HCCs (87.5%; p = 0.001). The sensitivity of on‐site cytology for malignancy detection was as high as that of conventional cytology. Similar to conventional cytology, the sensitivity of on‐site cytology for non‐HCC detection (99.3%) was higher than that for HCCs (79.2%; p
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF