Search

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of combining fractional 2940-nm Erbium:YAG (Er:YAG) laser with autologous plateletrich plasma (PRP) versus its combination with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for enhancing the outcome of postsurgical and post-traumatic scars. METHODS: Fourty-five individuals with post-surgical or post-traumatic scars were randomly divided into three groups: Group A received four fractional Er:YAG laser sessions spaced four weeks apart along with eight sessions of intradermal PRP injections spaced two weeks apart; Group B received four fractional Er:YAG laser sessions spaced four weeks apart along with two sessions of light emitting diode (LED) weekly; and Group C received four fractional Er:YAG laser sessions spaced four weeks apart. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using clinical photographs, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), patient satisfaction and histopathology. RESULTS: Regarding vascularity following treatment and the total VSS score, there were significant differences between the studied groups, with scoring was the lowest in Group A compared to Group B and C. Patient satisfaction was the highest in Group A compared to Group B and C. LIMITATIONS: A limitation of the current study is the short follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Scar revision therapy using combined fractional Er:YAG laser with either PRP or LLLT were found to be more efficient and superior to fractional Er:YAG laser alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Alopecia areata (AA) is a nonscarring alopecia that can affect any hairy area of the body. Excimer light at 308 nm with immunosuppressive effects is recommended as a promising management method for AA. Objectives. To assess the efficacy and safety of excimer light at 308 nm alone versus a combination of tacrolimus 0.1% and excimer light in the treatment of alopecia areata. Methods. Forty patients with AA of the scalp were divided into two groups, group A was treated with an excimer lamp twice per week for three months, and group B was treated with a combination of tacrolimus 0.1% and an excimer light. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by the SALT score and serum T‐regulatory cells at the baseline, after 3 months from the baseline, and after 6 months from the beginning of treatment. Results. In group (A), the median SALT decreased from the baseline (13.15) to (6.15) 3 months after the baseline and further decreased after 6 months of follow‐up to (3.3). While in group (B), the median SALT score was decreased from the baseline (11.15) to (0.5) after 6 months from the beginning of treatment. After 3 months, there was improvement in Treg function in both groups A and B (4.98 ± 1.02, 5.50 ± 0.84), respectively. There was a significantly higher improvement in group B (85.19 ± 8.55) than group A (70.05 ± 9.95). Dermoscopic findings reveal decreased signs of activity in group B more than group A. Conclusion. The combination of excimer light and tacrolimus is more effective than excimer light alone in treatment of AA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In mild psoriasis, topical agents remain the mainstay of treatment. However, the available treatments are not satisfactory for a significant proportion of patients in many terms such as efficacy and safety. Because of these deficits, augmentation of therapeutic effect seems desirable. This study aims: To evaluate the efficacy of topical cyclosporine cream, delivered by fractional CO2 laser vs the efficacy of topical clobetasol cream for the treatment of mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. Patients and methods: Twenty‐two patients with chronic plaque psoriasis involving <10% BSA were included in this study. They were randomly allocated into 2 groups. In Group A, patients were instructed to apply cyclosporine cream twice daily for 5 consecutive days per week immediately after fractional carbon dioxide laser session. While in Group B, clobetasol cream was applied twice daily for 5 consecutive days per week until complete clearance or for a maximum of 10 weeks. The efficacy was objectively assisted clinically and by histopathology by using the scores and skin biopsy. Results: There was a significant improvement of erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling (p < 0.001) with the use of topical cyclosporine cream delivered by the aid of fractional CO2 laser, compared to base line. However, the improvement was more significant with topical clobetasol cream. Conclusion: Laser‐assisted delivery of topical cyclosporine can provide comparable clinical and pathological improvement to that of clobetasol in the psoriatic plaques. These findings were apparent in patients with less widespread disease. However, topical steroid showed more improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]