Search

Poor sleep quality, a global public health concern, poses a significant burden on individuals, particularly health care university students facing intense academic stress. A three-center cross-sectional study was conducted at the Higher Institute of Nursing and Health Sciences in Tetouan (Morocco), Faculty of Medicine in Tangier (Morocco) and Faculty of Nursing in Valencia (Spain). We collected various data using a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Pittsburgh sleep quality questionnaire, the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) and the smartphone addiction questionnaire short-version (SAS-SV). A total of 1210 students were included in our study (mean age 20.4 years, 67.2% female, nursing students (66.2%) and medical students (33.8%), 76.1% students from Morocco and 33.9% from Spain). Analysis revealed a higher prevalence of poor sleep quality among Moroccans students compared to Spanish ones ( p < 0.001), that nursing students showed less favorable sleep quality than medical students ( p < 0.011) and that living with a chronic disease was linked to less favorable sleep quality ( p < 0.001). Lastly, intense or weak physical activity and smartphone addiction were correlated with poor sleep quality ( p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, an association persisted between poor sleep quality and factors such as the country of study (Odds ratio (OR): 6.25 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.34-9.09]), involvement in nursing studies (OR: 3.50 [95% CI: 2.36-5.27]), and the presence of chronic diseases (OR: 2.70 [95% CI: 1.72-4.16]), ( p < 0.01 each). Our findings highlight the multifaceted factors affecting sleep quality in young university students. The implications underscore the imperative of interventions tailored to this demographic group.

Background The Mediterranean diet (MD) has been recognized by several studies as beneficial for health improvement. The degree of adherence to this diet has also been evaluated using several scales, particularly time-consuming measures such as the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). This study aims to (a) adapt into Moroccan Arabic the 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), which is a simple and brief tool that assesses the degree of diet adherence and was used in the Prevencion con Dieta Mediterranea (PREDIMED) study, and (b) determine its psychometric properties. Methods MEDAS consists of 12 questions on food frequency and two on dietary habits, with each question scoring 0 or 1. To translate and adapt the scale, Beaton et al.'s six-step cross-cultural adaptation process guidelines were followed. The screener's psychometric properties were tested on staff at the CHU Mohammed VI (Tangier), i.e., the hospital's administrative and maintenance staff, excluding medical and paramedical personnel. Internal consistency was evaluated using the Kuder-Richardson 21 (K-R 21) formula, while test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Moreover, criterion validity was performed using the Spearman correlation between the MEDAS and the MedQ-Sus scores. Discrimination performance was also tested using the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results The validation study included 160 participants who completed both questionnaires. The K-R 21 formula estimated strong internal consistency in the range of 0.851. The ICC of test-retest reliability was significant at 0.876 95% CI [0.831-0.909]. The MEDAS score correlated significantly with the comparative MedQ-Sus score (Spearman's rho = 0.494 95% CI [0.363-0.606], p < 0.001). Also, MEDAS can strongly distinguish between MD adherence and non-adherence (optimal cut-off = 7.5, sensitivity 0.81, specificity = 0.57), with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.743 95% CI [0.667-0.819], p < 0.001. Conclusion The results showed that MEDAS is a valid and time-saving instrument for assessing adherence to the MD in the Moroccan population., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Sammoud et al.)

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unpredictable and it varies from mild to severe and critical forms that are associated with a higher mortality rate. Risk factors associated with severe forms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have been investigated worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the clinical course of severe COVID-19 patients and to compare them with the non-severe patients concerning clinical and epidemiological characteristics, biological parameters and outcomes and thus, highlight the factors associated with severe forms of COVID-19 in our country., Methods: This is a single-center, ambidirectional cohort study, conducted in Tangier's COVID-19 care premises. We included diagnosed COVID-19 patients between August 2020 and October 2021. Sampling was performed through stratification according to clinical forms. All patients were followed-up throughout disease evolution, until remission for mild to moderate forms and 30 days after discharge for hospitalized patient's group (severe to critical forms). Data were collected using the WHO International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection (ISARIC) case report form (CRF) and extracted from medical records alongside with interviews with patients and their relatives., Results: Among 915 included COVID-19 patients in Tangier, the non-severe group comprised 344 (37.6%) patients and the severe group comprised 571 (62.4%) patients. Some 514 were males (56.2%) and 401 were females (43.8%) and the mean age was 56.01 years (±16.76). The mean delay from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 6.65 days ±4.68 in the severe group and 5.4 days ±4.57 in the non-severe group (p<0.001). Among the severe patient's group, 230 (40.3%) patients were admitted to the resuscitation unit, 258 (45.2%) patients were deceased during hospitalization, 313 (54.8%) were discharged alive, and 16 deaths occurred after discharge. Demographic, clinical, and biological characteristics showed significant differences between non-severe group and severe group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed increased odds of severity with male gender (adjusted odds ratio, aOR=2.91, p<0.003), age over 65 years old (aOR=2.68, p<0.001), diabetes (aOR=2.18, p<0.03), elevated D-dimers (>1 mg/mL) (aOR=6.09, p<0.001), superinfection (aOR=3.78, p<0.001), and baseline lymphopenia < 1000c/mm3 (aOR=8.66, p<0.001)., Conclusion: The high-risk factors for developing severe COVID-19 are age > 65 years, male gender, diabetes, elevated D-dimers, baseline lymphopenia, and superinfection. To predict severe and fatal COVID-19, factors identified may be used in the development of prediction tools for COVID-19 prognosis and risk stratification. Recalling the importance of considering at-risk populations, the management of epidemics must be planned in conjunction with the specificity of each community. Findings from our study may serve for health economic analyses and research in order to assist public health decisions in the future and should be integrated into health emergency preparedness and response strategies ensuring a resilient health system., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Mahdi et al.)

Background Since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, several studies have been conducted around the world in an attempt to understand this heterogeneous and unpredictable disease and to prevent related death. It was therefore necessary to study the associated risk factors of Covid-19-related mortality. Objectives The aim of this study was to describe the clinical profile and to identify the factors associated with mortality of patients with Covid-19 in Morocco. Methods We performed a mixed cohort study (retrospective and prospective) of 615 in-patients with Covid-19 disease, enrolled between August 2020 and October 2021. We followed the cohort throughout the hospitalization until discharge and 30 days thereafter. Results The median age was 64 years old; 62.1% of the patients were male. The mean time from symptom onset to hospitalization was 8.5 days (±4.67), and 68.1% of patients had comorbidities. On admission, the most common symptoms were dyspnea (82.2%), cough (80.3%), and fever (76.8%). The main follow-up complication was secondary infection (56.9%). Based on univariate analysis, male gender (p<0.008 and brut relative risk { b RR}=1.57), advanced age (p<0.001), lung involvement (p<0.001), lymphopenia (p<0.001 and  b RR=2.32), D-dimers of >500 µg/l (p<0.007 and  b RR=2.47), C-reactive protein (CRP) of >130 mg/l (p<0.001 and  b RR=2.45), elevated creatinine (p<0.013 and  b RR=1.61), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) of >500 U/l (p<0.001 and  b RR=7.16), receiving corticosteroids (p<0.001 and  b RR=5.08), invasive ventilation (p<0.001 and  b RR=30.10), the stay in the resuscitation unit (p<0.001 and  b RR=13.37), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (p<0.001 and  b RR=10.98) were associated with a higher risk of death. In the opposite, receiving azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine (p<0.001 and  b RR=0.28) and pre-admission anticoagulants (p<0.005 and  b RR=0.46) was associated with a lower risk of mortality. Multivariate regression analysis showed that age of >60 years (p<0.001 and adjusted odds ratio {aOR}=4.90), the use of invasive ventilation (p<0.001 and aOR=9.60), the stay in the resuscitation unit (p<0.001 and aOR=5.09), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (p<0.001 and aOR=6.49) were independent predictors of Covid-19 mortality. Conclusion In this cohort study focusing on Covid-19 in-patient's mortality, we found that age of >60 years, the use of invasive ventilation, the stay in the resuscitation unit, and acute respiratory distress syndrome were independent predictors of Covid-19 mortality. The results of this study can be used to improve knowledge for better clinical management of Covid-19 in-patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Charif et al.)

Background: The frequency of heart failure (HF) in Tunisia is on the rise and has now become a public health concern. This is mainly due to an aging Tunisian population (Tunisia has one of the oldest populations in Africa as well as the highest life expectancy in the continent) and an increase in coronary artery disease and hypertension. However, no extensive data are available on demographic characteristics, prognosis, and quality of care of patients with HF in Tunisia (nor in North Africa)., Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze, follow, and evaluate patients with HF in a large nation-wide multicenter trial., Methods: A total of 1700 patients with HF diagnosed by the investigator will be included in the National Tunisian Registry of Heart Failure study (NATURE-HF). Patients must visit the cardiology clinic 1, 3, and 12 months after study inclusion. This follow-up is provided by the investigator. All data are collected via the DACIMA Clinical Suite web interface., Results: At the end of the study, we will note the occurrence of cardiovascular death (sudden death, coronary artery disease, refractory HF, stroke), death from any cause (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular), and the occurrence of a rehospitalization episode for an HF relapse during the follow-up period. Based on these data, we will evaluate the demographic characteristics of the study patients, the characteristics of pathological antecedents, and symptomatic and clinical features of HF. In addition, we will report the paraclinical examination findings such as the laboratory standard parameters and brain natriuretic peptides, electrocardiogram or 24-hour Holter monitoring, echocardiography, and coronarography. We will also provide a description of the therapeutic environment and therapeutic changes that occur during the 1-year follow-up of patients, adverse events following medical treatment and intervention during the 3- and 12-month follow-up, the evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction during the 3- and 12-month follow-up, the overall rate of rehospitalization over the 1-year follow-up for an HF relapse, and the rate of rehospitalization during the first 3 months after inclusion into the study., Conclusions: The NATURE-HF study will fill a significant gap in the dynamic landscape of HF care and research. It will provide unique and necessary data on the management and outcomes of patients with HF. This study will yield the largest contemporary longitudinal cohort of patients with HF in Tunisia., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03262675; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03262675., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/12262., (©Leila Abid, Ikram Kammoun, Manel Ben Halima, Salma Charfeddine, Hedi Ben Slima, Meriem Drissa, Khadija Mzoughi, Dorra Mbarek, Leila Riahi, Saoussen Antit, Afef Ben Halima, Wejdene Ouechtati, Emna Allouche, Mehdi Mechri, Chedi Yousfi, Ali Khorchani, Omar Abid, Kais Sammoud, Khaled Ezzaouia, Imen Gtif, Sana Ouali, Feten Triki, Sonia Hamdi, Selim Boudiche, Marwa Chebbi, Mouna Hentati, Amani Farah, Habib Triki, Houda Ghardallou, Haythem Raddaoui, Sofien Zayed, Fares Azaiez, Fadwa Omri, Akram Zouari, Zine Ben Ali, Aymen Najjar, Houssem Thabet, Mouna Chaker, Samar Mohamed, Marwa Chouaieb, Abdelhamid Ben Jemaa, Haythem Tangour, Yassmine Kammoun, Mahmoud Bouhlel, Seifeddine Azaiez, Rim Letaief, Salah Maskhi, Aymen Amri, Hela Naanaa, Raoudha Othmani, Iheb Chahbani, Houcine Zargouni, Syrine Abid, Mokdad Ayari, Ines ben Ameur, Ali Gasmi, Nejeh ben Halima, Habib Haouala, Essia Boughzela, Lilia Zakhama, Soraya ben Youssef, Wided Nasraoui, Mohamed Rachid Boujnah, Nadia Barakett, Sondes Kraiem, Habiba Drissa, Ali Ben Khalfallah, Habib Gamra, Salem Kachboura, Leila Bezdah, Hedi Baccar, Sami Milouchi, Wissem Sdiri, Skander Ben Omrane, Salem Abdesselem, Alifa Kanoun, Karima Hezbri, Faiez Zannad, Alexandre Mebazaa, Samir Kammoun, Mohamed Sami Mourali, Faouzi Addad. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 27.10.2021.)

The NATURE-HF registry was aimed to describe clinical epidemiology and 1-year outcomes of outpatients and inpatients with heart failure (HF). This is a prospective, multicenter, observational survey conducted in Tunisian Cardiology centers. A total of 2040 patients were included in the study. Of these, 1632 (80%) were outpatients with chronic HF (CHF). The mean hospital stay was 8.7 ± 8.2 days. The mortality rate during the initial hospitalization event for AHF was 7.4%. The all-cause 1-year mortality rate was 22.8% among AHF patients and 10.6% among CHF patients. Among CHF patients, the older age, diabetes, anemia, reduced EF, ischemic etiology, residual congestion and the absence of ACEI/ ARBs treatment were independent predictors of 1-year cumulative rates of rehospitalization and mortality. The female sex and the functional status were independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality and rehospitalization in AHF patients. This study confirmed that acute HF is still associated with a poor prognosis, while the mid-term outcomes in patients with chronic HF seems to be improved. Some differences across countries may be due to different clinical characteristics and differences in healthcare systems., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) is a common but often under diagnosed condition that constitutes a real public health problem. The prevalence of OSAS in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients ranges from 32 to 85% according to recent studies., Aim: To determine the prevalence and severity of OSAS in a population followed for non-valvular AF (NVAF), and to identify OSAS's predictive factors in this population., Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, including successive patients followed for NVAF. Patients with a known history of OSAS were not included. All patients had a clinical screening for symptoms suggestive of OSAS and underwent an ambulatory sleep study., Results: We included 100 patients in this study. OSAS was detected in 90% of NVAF patients. The average apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 21.6 ± 13.6 e/h. OSAS was mild in 32%, moderate in 27% and severe in 31% of cases. Clinical characteristics were comparable between patients with and without OSAS. The multivariate analytical study concluded that independent predictive factors of OSAS in AF patients were an age greater than 61 years (p=0.029), AF duration more than 2 years (p=0.04) and snoring (p=0.01)., Conclusions: OSAS was diagnosed in 90% of NVAF patients. Thus, a systematic screening for OSAS in AF patients may be a relevant approach given its high prevalence in this population and its therapeutic implications. Snoring, age greater than 61 years, and AF duration more than 2 years were independently associated with OSAS in our study.