Search

Cefazolin is an antibiotic that is commonly administered perioperatively to reduce the risk of surgical site infections. Cephalosporins have a well-established safety profile, but have been associated with thrombocytopenia and neutropenia due to their myelosuppressive effects. While this effect may be benign in healthy patients undergoing minor surgery, it can be detrimental in patients with underlying hematologic disorders presenting for open-heart surgery. Herein, we discuss the first case in the literature of cefazolin-induced thrombocytopenia and severe coagulopathy in a patient with polycythemia vera (PCV) during a coronary artery bypass-grafting surgery.

The Syncardia total artificial heart system is the only commercially approved durable device for treating biventricular heart failure patients awaiting heart transplantation. Conventionally, the Syncardia total artificial heart system is implanted based on the distance from the anterior aspect of the 10th thoracic vertebra to the sternum and the patient's body surface area. However, this criterion does not account for chest wall musculoskeletal deformities. This case report describes a patient with a pectus excavatum who developed compression of the inferior vena cava after Syncardia total artificial heart implantation and how transesophageal echocardiography guided chest wall surgery to accommodate the total artificial heart system.

Background The perioperative anesthesia care during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation is still evolving. Objective To assess the feasibility and safety of S-ICD implantation with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus general anesthesia (GA) in a tertiary care center. Methods This is a single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing S-ICD implantation between October 2012 and May 2019. Patients were categorized into MAC and GA group based on the mode of anesthesia. Procedural success without escalation to GA was the primary endpoint of the study, whereas intraprocedural hemodynamics, need of pharmacological support for hypotension and bradycardia, length of the procedure, stay in the post-anesthesia care unit, and postoperative pain were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results The study comprises 287 patients with MAC in 111 and GA in 176 patients. Compared to MAC, patients in GA group were younger and had a higher body mass index. All patients had successful S-ICD implantation. Only one patient (0.9%) in the MAC group was converted to GA. Despite a similar baseline heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) in both groups, patients with GA had significantly lower HR and MAP during the procedure and more frequently required pharmacological hemodynamic support. Length of the procedure, stay in the postanesthesia care unit, and postoperative pain was similar in both groups. Conclusion This retrospective experience suggests that implantation of S-ICD is feasible and safe with MAC. Use of GA is associated with more frequent administration of hemodynamic drugs during S-ICD implantation.

To assess the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after S-ICD implantation by implementing a specific analgesia protocol and phone follow-up. Consecutive patients presenting for outpatient S-ICD implantation were enrolled between 1/1/2018 and 4/30/2019. An analgesia protocol included pre-operative acetaminophen and oxycodone, intraoperative local bupivacaine, and limited use of oxycodone-acetaminophen at discharge. The primary outcome was successful same-day discharge. Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, 14, and 30 and any unplanned health care visits during the 1-month follow-up period were assessed. Out of 53 potentially eligible S-ICD patients, 49 patients (92.5%) were enrolled and successfully discharged on the same day. Mean age of these 49 patients was 47 ± 14 years. There were no acute procedural complications. Severe pain (NPRS ≥ 8) on POD 0, 1, and 3 was present in 14.3%, 14.3%, and 8.2% of patients, respectively. The total in-hospital stay was 534 ± 80 min. Four unplanned visits (8%) due to cardiac or device-related issues occurred during 1-month follow-up, including 2 patients with heart failure exacerbation, one patient with an incisional infection, and one patient with inappropriate shocks. With the appropriate institutional protocol including specific analgesics and phone follow-up, same-day discharge after outpatient S-ICD implantation is feasible and appears safe for most patients.. Device-related pain can be severe in the first 3 days post-implantation and can be successfully treated with limited supply of narcotic medications.

BACKGROUND Pulmonary cuff dysfunction, either due to pulmonary vein obstruction, pulmonary vein stenosis , or pulmonary vein thrombosis, is an uncommon, yet serious complication after lung transplantation . Although there have been numerous reports of its occurrence, there is little consensus regarding the hemodynamic parameters associated with its presentation and diagnostic considerations. This systematic review summarizes the evidence surrounding pulmonary cuff dysfunction after lung transplantation surgery and empirically analyzes its implications. METHODS Databases were examined for all articles and abstracts reporting on pulmonary cuff dysfunction. Data collected included: number of patients studied; patients’ characteristics; incidences of pulmonary vein stenosis and pulmonary vein thrombosis; and timing and imaging modality utilized for diagnosis. RESULTS Thirty-four full-text citations were included in this review. The point prevalence of pulmonary vein stenosis and thrombosis were 1.4% and 2.5%, respectively. The peak pulmonary cuff velocity associated with dysfunction was found to be 1.59 ± 0.66 m/sec. The diameter of the dysfunctional pulmonary vein was noted to be 0.48 ± 0.20 cm. The majority of diagnoses were made in the early post-operative period using transesophageal echocardiography . Overall, 41.3% of patients (26 of 63) required emergent procedural reintervention, and 32% of patients (20 of 63) diagnosed with pulmonary cuff dysfunction died during their hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying pulmonary cuff dysfunction after lung transplant surgery , and the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography for detection of this complication. The clinical implications of these results warrant the further development of identification and management strategies for lung transplant patients.