Search

BackgroundThere are currently limited data for the use of specific antiviral therapies for the treatment of Ebola virus disease (EVD). While there is anecdotal evidence that supportive care may be effective, there is a paucity of direct experimental data to demonstrate a role for supportive care in EVD. We studied the impact of ICU-level supportive care interventions including fluid resuscitation, vasoactive medications, blood transfusion, hydrocortisone, and ventilator support on the pathophysiology of EVD in rhesus macaques infected with a universally lethal dose of Ebola virus strain Makona C07.MethodsFour NHPs were infected with a universally lethal dose Ebola virus strain Makona, in accordance with the gold standard lethal Ebola NHP challenge model. Following infection, the following therapeutic interventions were employed: continuous bedside supportive care, ventilator support, judicious fluid resuscitation, vasoactive medications, blood transfusion, and hydrocortisone as needed to treat cardiovascular compromise. A range of physiological parameters were continuously monitored to gage any response to the interventions.ResultsAll four NHPs developed EVD and demonstrated a similar clinical course. All animals reached a terminal endpoint, which occurred at an average time of 166.5 ± 14.8 h post-infection. Fluid administration may have temporarily blunted a rise in lactate, but the effect was short lived. Vasoactive medications resulted in short-lived improvements in mean arterial pressure. Blood transfusion and hydrocortisone did not appear to have a significant positive impact on the course of the disease.ConclusionsThe model employed for this study is reflective of an intramuscular infection in humans (e.g., needle stick) and is highly lethal to NHPs. Using this model, we found that the animals developed progressive severe organ dysfunction and profound shock preceding death. While the overall impact of supportive care on the observed pathophysiology was limited, we did observe some time-dependent positive responses. Since this model is highly lethal, it does not reflect the full spectrum of human EVD. Our findings support the need for continued development of animal models that replicate the spectrum of human disease as well as ongoing development of anti-Ebola therapies to complement supportive care.

Background: The 2014–2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa recapitulated that nosocomial spread of Ebola virus could occur and that health care workers were at particular risk including notable cases in Europe and North America. These instances highlighted the need for centers to better prepare for potential Ebola virus cases, including understanding how the virus spreads and which interventions pose the greatest risk. Methods: We created a fully equipped intensive care unit (ICU), within a Biosafety Level 4 (BSL4) laboratory, and infected multiple sedated non-human primates (NHPs) with Ebola virus. While providing bedside care, we sampled blood, urine, and gastric residuals, as well as buccal, ocular, nasal, rectal, and skin swabs, to assess the risks associated with routine care. We also assessed the physical environment at end-point. Results: Although viral RNA was detectable in blood as early as three days post-infection, it was not detectable in the urine, gastric fluid, or swabs until late-stage disease. While droplet spread and fomite contamination were present on a few of the surfaces that were routinely touched while providing care in the ICU for the infected animal, these may have been abrogated through good routine hygiene practices. Conclusions: Overall this study has helped further our understanding of which procedures may pose the highest risk to healthcare providers and provides temporal evidence of this over the clinical course of disease.

Introduction: There are currently no licensed treatments for Ebola Virus Disease, making supportive care the only viable option. While there is anecdotal evidence that this is effective, the paucity of experimental data to demonstrate the role of supportive care in EVD has limited its use. We hypothesized that supportive care would enhance survival in a non-human primate (NHP) model of EVD. Methods: Three NHPs were infected with Ebola virus strain Makona and provided continuous bedside supportive care, including ventilatory support, fluid resuscitation, vasoactive medications, blood transfusion and hydrocortisone as needed to treat cardiovascular compromise. Findings: All three NHPs developed EVD and demonstrated a very similar clinical course and ultimately reached a terminal endpoint at an average time of 160 ± 8·7 hours post infection, which is similar to caged animals (144-192 hours). Fluid administration may have temporarily blunted a rise in lactate but the effect was short lived. Vasoactive medications, blood transfusion and hydrocortisone did not appear to have an impact. Interpretation: Supportive care did not impact survival length in a high stringency NHP EVD disease model. Our findings help support the need for the development and use of specific anti-Ebola therapies. Funding Statement: Funding was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Government of Canada. Declaration of Interests: None of the authors had a conflict of interest with regard to this study. Ethics Approval Statement: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional Animal Care Committee, in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) guidelines.