Search

To evaluate intraretinal cystoid spaces in patients with idiopathic macular hole (MH).Retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with full-thickness MH who underwent successful MH surgery and 12 months of follow-up. Custom software was applied to preoperative optical coherence tomography scans to generate fluid volume. Inner fluid volume was defined as cystoid spaces in the inner nuclear layer, and outer fluid volume was defined as cystoid spaces in Henle fiber layer of the outer nuclear layer.Thirty-nine eyes from 39 participants were included. Postoperative 12-month visual acuity correlated with both inner fluid volume and minimum MH size (both P0.05) but not outer fluid volume. Inner fluid volume positively correlated with minimum MH size ( P = 0.0003). After accounting for minimum MH size with multivariable analysis, inner fluid volume effect on VA remained significant ( P = 0.025). After dividing inner fluid volume into tertiles, mean baseline visual acuity was 20/50 in eyes with small inner fluid volume, and was 20/125 in eyes with large inner fluid volume ( P = 0.0039). Mean postoperative 12-month visual acuity was 20/20 in eyes with small inner fluid volume compared with 20/32 in eyes with large inner fluid volume ( P = 0.019).Increased inner fluid volume was associated with worse postoperative VA.

Visual acuity (VA) is one of the most important clinical data points in ophthalmology. However, few options for validated at-home VA assessments are currently available.To validate 3 at-home visual acuity tests in comparison with in-office visual acuity.Between July 2020 and April 2021, eligible participants with VA of 20/200 or better were recruited from 4 university-based ophthalmology clinics (comprehensive, cornea, glaucoma, and retina clinics). Participants were prospectively randomized to self-administer 2 of 3 at-home VA tests (printed chart, mobile phone app, and website) within 3 days before their standard-of-care clinic visit. Participants completed a survey assessing usability of the at-home tests. At the clinic visit, best-corrected Snellen distance acuity was measured as the reference standard.The at-home VA test results were compared with the in-office VA test results using paired and unpaired t tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, analysis of variance, χ2 tests, and Cohen κ agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each at-home test were calculated to detect significant VA changes (≥0.2 logMAR) from the in-office baseline.A total of 121 participants with a mean (SD) age of 63.8 (13.0) years completed the study. The mean in-office VA was 0.11 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/25) with similar numbers of participants from the 4 clinics. Mean difference (logMAR) between the at-home test and in-office acuity was -0.07 (95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04) for the printed chart, -0.12 (95% CI, -0.15 to -0.09) for the mobile phone app, and -0.13 (95% CI, -0.16 to -0.10) for the website test. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the printed chart was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79), mobile phone app was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46-0.69), and website test was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.53-0.73).The 3 at-home VA test results (printed chart, mobile phone app, and website) appeared comparable within 1 line to in-office VA measurements. Older participants were more likely to have limited access to digital tools. Further development and validation of at-home VA testing modalities is needed with the expansion of teleophthalmology care.

Purpose To determine whether dilation status has a clinically meaningful effect on sensitivity in normal subjects undergoing two-color dark-adapted perimetry, which can be useful to assess rod function. Methods A perimeter measured naturally and pharmacologically dilated scotopic sensitivities using a test grid consisting of 16 points across the horizontal meridian ranging from 60° temporal to 45° nasal using cyan (500 nm wavelength) or red (650 nm wavelength) stimuli. The primary outcome was average overall sensitivity based on dilation status, which was compared using a linear mixed effect model for each color stimuli. A difference of 2 dB or more was considered clinically significant. Results Twenty-nine eyes from 15 subjects (nine female) ages 23 to 63 with no known retinal pathology were included. Pharmacologically dilated eyes were 0.54 dB (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05 dB to 1.03 dB; P = 0.032) more sensitive to a red stimulus than naturally dilated eyes, but this was not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Pharmacologically dilated eyes were 0.03 dB (95% CI, −0.20 dB to 0.14 dB; P = 0.734) less sensitive to a cyan stimulus compared to naturally dilated eyes. Conclusions These findings show no clinically significant differences in sensitivity of scotopic perimetry in eyes without retinal pathology based on dilation status for both cyan and red stimuli. Translational Relevance In this study, pharmacological dilation did not have a clinically meaningful effect on sensitivity, suggesting that this is not necessary when using two-color dark-adapted perimetry to assess for rod function.