Search

Built on top of the Geant4 toolkit, GATE is collaboratively developed for more than 15 years to design Monte Carlo simulations of nuclear-based imaging systems. It is, in particular, used by researchers and industrials to design, optimize, understand and create innovative emission tomography systems. In this paper, we reviewed the recent developments that have been proposed to simulate modern detectors and provide a comprehensive report on imaging systems that have been simulated and evaluated in GATE. Additionally, some methodological developments that are not specific for imaging but that can improve detector modeling and provide computation time gains, such as Variance Reduction Techniques and Artificial Intelligence integration, are described and discussed.

Background: Standardized patient‐specific pretreatment dosimetry planning is mandatory in the modern era of nuclear molecular radiotherapy, which may eventually lead to improvements in the final therapeutic outcome. Only a comprehensive definition of a dosage therapeutic window encompassing the range of absorbed doses, that is, helpful without being detrimental can lead to therapy individualization and improved outcomes. As a result, setting absorbed dose safety limits for organs at risk (OARs) requires knowledge of the absorbed dose–effect relationship. Data sets of consistent and reliable inter‐center dosimetry findings are required to characterize this relationship. Purpose: We developed and standardized a new pretreatment planning model consisting of a predictive dosimetry procedure for OARs in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with 177Lu‐DOTATATE (Lutathera). In the retrospective study described herein, we used machine learning (ML) regression algorithms to predict absorbed doses in OARs by exploiting a combination of radiomic and dosiomic features extracted from patients' imaging data. Methods: Pretreatment and posttreatment data for 20 patients with NETs treated with 177Lu‐DOTATATE were collected from two clinical centers. A total of 3412 radiomic and dosiomic features were extracted from the patients' computed tomography (CT) scans and dose maps, respectively. All dose maps were generated using Monte Carlo simulations. An ML regression model was designed based on ML algorithms for predicting the absorbed dose in every OAR (liver, left kidney, right kidney, and spleen) before and after the therapy and between each therapy session, thus predicting any possible radiotoxic effects. Results: We evaluated nine ML regression algorithms. Our predictive model achieved a mean absolute dose error (MAE, in Gy) of 0.61 for the liver, 1.58 for the spleen, 1.30 for the left kidney, and 1.35 for the right kidney between pretherapy 68Ga‐DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and posttherapy 177Lu‐DOTATATE single photon emission (SPECT)/CT scans. Τhe best predictive performance observed was based on the gradient boost for the liver, the left kidney and the right kidney, and on the extra tree regressor for the spleen. Evaluation of the model's performance according to its ability to predict the absorbed dose in each OAR in every possible combination of pretherapy 68Ga‐DOTATOC PET/CT and any posttherapy 177Lu‐DOTATATE treatment cycle SPECT/CT scans as well as any 177Lu‐DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle and the consequent 177Lu‐DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle revealed mean absorbed dose differences ranges from −0.55 to 0.68 Gy. Incorporating radiodosiomics features from the 68Ga‐DOTATOC PET/CT and first 177Lu‐DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle scans further improved the precision and minimized the standard deviation of the predictions in nine out of 12 instances. An average improvement of 57.34% was observed (range: 17.53%–96.12%). However, it's important to note that in three instances (i.e., Ga,C.1 → C3 in spleen and left kidney, and Ga,C.1 → C2 in right kidney) we did not observe an improvement (absolute differences of 0.17, 0.08, and 0.05 Gy, respectively). Wavelet‐based features proved to have high correlated predictive value, whereas non‐linear‐based ML regression algorithms proved to be more capable than the linear‐based of producing precise prediction in our case. Conclusions: The combination of radiomics and dosiomics has potential utility for personalized molecular radiotherapy (PMR) response evaluation and OAR dose prediction. These radiodosiomic features can potentially provide information on any possible disease recurrence and may be highly useful in clinical decision‐making, especially regarding dose escalation issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The quality of phantom images was previously shown to be higher on digital (Vereos Philips®) compared to analog PET (Ingenuity Philips®) cameras. This study aimed to determine the extent to which this difference still remains significant on normal brain 18F-FDG PET images. Methods: Relative noise and contrast as well as border sharpness (a spatial resolution index) of central (striata) and peripheral (occiput) gray-matter structures were compared between 10 sets of normal brain 18F-FDG PET images recorded and reconstructed on digital and analog last-generation PET cameras, together with a subjective visual analysis of image quality provided by experienced physicians. Results: Compared with analog PET, digital PET provided marked improvements in image quality parameters. The median relative noise was decreased (− 22%), while gray/white-matter contrast was increased (+ 27%/+ 41% for central/peripheral gray-matter structures), with these results being consistent with visual analysis. In addition, a clear enhancement in image sharpness was further documented for digital PET owing to the possible use of a 1-mm3 voxel size (+ 24%/+ 21%). Conclusions: On normal brain 18F-FDG images and compared with a last-generation analog PET, the fully digital PET camera offers marked improvements in image noise and contrast, as well as significant potential for further enhancing spatial resolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective . We introduce a versatile methodology for the accurate modelling of PET imaging systems via Monte Carlo simulations, using the Geant4 application for tomographic emission (GATE) platform. Accurate Monte Carlo modelling involves the incorporation of a complete analytical signal processing chain, called the digitizer in GATE, to emulate the different count rates encountered in actual positron emission tomography (PET) systems. Approach . The proposed approach consists of two steps: (1) modelling the digitizer to replicate the detection chain of real systems, covering all available parameters, whether publicly accessible or supplied by manufacturers; (2) estimating the remaining parameters, i.e. background noise level, detection efficiency, and pile-up, using optimisation techniques based on experimental single and prompt event rates. We show that this two-step optimisation reproduces the other experimental count rates (true, scatter, and random), without the need for additional adjustments. This method has been applied and validated with experimental data derived from the NEMA count losses test for three state-of-the-art SiPM-based time-of-flight (TOF)-PET systems: Philips Vereos, Siemens Biograph Vision 600 and GE Discovery MI 4-ring. Main results . The results show good agreement between experiments and simulations for the three PET systems, with absolute relative discrepancies below 3%, 6%, 6%, 7% and 12% for prompt, random, true, scatter and noise equivalent count rates, respectively, within the 0-10 kBq·ml -1 activity concentration range typically observed in whole-body 18 F scans. Significance . Overall, the proposed digitizer optimisation method was shown to be effective in reproducing count rates and NECR for three of the latest generation SiPM-based TOF-PET imaging systems. The proposed methodology could be applied to other PET scanners., (Creative Commons Attribution license.)

Background: Standardized patient-specific pretreatment dosimetry planning is mandatory in the modern era of nuclear molecular radiotherapy, which may eventually lead to improvements in the final therapeutic outcome. Only a comprehensive definition of a dosage therapeutic window encompassing the range of absorbed doses, that is, helpful without being detrimental can lead to therapy individualization and improved outcomes. As a result, setting absorbed dose safety limits for organs at risk (OARs) requires knowledge of the absorbed dose-effect relationship. Data sets of consistent and reliable inter-center dosimetry findings are required to characterize this relationship., Purpose: We developed and standardized a new pretreatment planning model consisting of a predictive dosimetry procedure for OARs in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera). In the retrospective study described herein, we used machine learning (ML) regression algorithms to predict absorbed doses in OARs by exploiting a combination of radiomic and dosiomic features extracted from patients' imaging data., Methods: Pretreatment and posttreatment data for 20 patients with NETs treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE were collected from two clinical centers. A total of 3412 radiomic and dosiomic features were extracted from the patients' computed tomography (CT) scans and dose maps, respectively. All dose maps were generated using Monte Carlo simulations. An ML regression model was designed based on ML algorithms for predicting the absorbed dose in every OAR (liver, left kidney, right kidney, and spleen) before and after the therapy and between each therapy session, thus predicting any possible radiotoxic effects., Results: We evaluated nine ML regression algorithms. Our predictive model achieved a mean absolute dose error (MAE, in Gy) of 0.61 for the liver, 1.58 for the spleen, 1.30 for the left kidney, and 1.35 for the right kidney between pretherapy 68 Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and posttherapy 177 Lu-DOTATATE single photon emission (SPECT)/CT scans. Τhe best predictive performance observed was based on the gradient boost for the liver, the left kidney and the right kidney, and on the extra tree regressor for the spleen. Evaluation of the model's performance according to its ability to predict the absorbed dose in each OAR in every possible combination of pretherapy 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and any posttherapy 177 Lu-DOTATATE treatment cycle SPECT/CT scans as well as any 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle and the consequent 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle revealed mean absorbed dose differences ranges from -0.55 to 0.68 Gy. Incorporating radiodosiomics features from the 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and first 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle scans further improved the precision and minimized the standard deviation of the predictions in nine out of 12 instances. An average improvement of 57.34% was observed (range: 17.53%-96.12%). However, it's important to note that in three instances (i.e., Ga,C.1 → C3 in spleen and left kidney, and Ga,C.1 → C2 in right kidney) we did not observe an improvement (absolute differences of 0.17, 0.08, and 0.05 Gy, respectively). Wavelet-based features proved to have high correlated predictive value, whereas non-linear-based ML regression algorithms proved to be more capable than the linear-based of producing precise prediction in our case., Conclusions: The combination of radiomics and dosiomics has potential utility for personalized molecular radiotherapy (PMR) response evaluation and OAR dose prediction. These radiodosiomic features can potentially provide information on any possible disease recurrence and may be highly useful in clinical decision-making, especially regarding dose escalation issues., (© 2023 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)