Search

In the absence of clinical trials, the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) on the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with primary distal and medium vessel occlusions (DMVO) is still not well defined. The aim of the study is to evaluate EVT with or without intravenous thrombolysis (EVT ± IVT) in primary DMVO stroke in comparison with a control cohort treated with IVT alone.

Background: There are limited data concerning procedure-related complications of endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion strokes. Aims: We evaluated the cumulative incidence, the clinical relevance in terms of increased disability and mortality, and risk factors for complications. Methods: From January 2011 to December 2017, 4799 patients were enrolled by 36 centers in the Italian Registry of Endovascular Stroke Treatment. Data on demographic and procedural characteristics, complications, and clinical outcome at three months were prospectively collected. Results: The complications cumulative incidence was 201 per 1000 patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. Ongoing antiplatelet therapy (p < 0.01; OR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.21–2.73) and large vessel occlusion site (carotid-T, p < 0.03; OR 3.05, 95% CI: 1.13–8.19; M2-segment-MCA, p < 0.01; OR 4.54, 95% CI: 1.66–12.44) were associated with a higher risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage/arterial perforation. Thrombectomy alone (p < 0.01; OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31–0.83) and younger age (p < 0.04; OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99) revealed a lower risk of developing dissection. M2-segment-MCA occlusion (p < 0.01; OR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19–0.64) and hypertension (p < 0.04; OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.6–0.98) were less related to clot embolization. Higher NIHSS at onset (p < 0.01; OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.06), longer groin-to-reperfusion time (p < 0.01; OR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02–1.07), diabetes (p < 0.01; OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.25–2.23), and LVO site (carotid-T, p < 0.01; OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.26–3.05; M2-segment-MCA, p < 0.02; OR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.08–2.42) were associated with a higher risk of developing symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage compared to no/asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. The subgroup of patients treated with thrombectomy alone presented a lower risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (p < 0.01; OR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55–0.90). Subarachnoid hemorrhage/arterial perforation and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after endovascular thrombectomy worsen both functional independence and mortality at three-month follow-up (p < 0.01). Distal embolization is associated with neurological deterioration (p < 0.01), while arterial dissection did not affect clinical outcome at follow-up. Conclusions: Complications globally considered are not uncommon and may result in poor clinical outcome. Early recognition of risk factors might help to prevent complications and manage them appropriately in order to maximize endovascular thrombectomy benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a life-threatening disease that leads to bowel infarction and death. The optimal management of AMI remains controversial. The present meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prognostic impact of surgical (SG) versus endovascular or hybrid intervention (EV) as the first-line treatment for acute arterial occlusive mesenteric ischemia and to assess whether endovascular strategy was actually effective in reducing bowel resection.Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. There have been no randomized controlled trials comparing SG versus EV for the treatment of AMI. We undertook this systematic review and meta-analysis according to MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines, assessing the included study quality with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.Results: Seven studies comparing EV versus SG as first strategy for the treatment of AMI were selected for the analyses, reporting of 3020 patients. EV was associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.59-0.79; fixed-effects analysis; p < 0.0001; I 2 = 4.9%; τ 2 = 0.025). Pooled prevalence of mortality was 19% for EV and 34% for SG. EV also showed a benefit impact on risk of bowel resection and second-look laparotomy.Conclusions: The present meta-analysis outlines that endovascular revascularization strategy seems to offer advantages in terms of in-hospital mortality and morbidity in case of arterial occlusive AMI. A multidisciplinary team consisting of radiologists, interventional radiologists, cardiovascular and general surgeons comes out to be essential to tailor the right procedure to the patient and improve the outcomes associated with AMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) along with emergent carotid stenting (eCAS) have been suggested to have a greater benefit in patients with tandem lesion (TL), compared to other strategies of treatment. Nonetheless, there is no agreement on whether the intracranial occlusion should be treated before the cervical ICA lesion, or vice versa. In this retrospective multicenter study, we sought to compare clinical and procedural outcomes of the two different treatment approaches in patients with TL., Materials and Methods: The prospective databases of 17 comprehensive stroke centers were screened for consecutive patients with TL who received MT and eCAS. Patients were divided in two groups based on whether they received MT before eCAS (MT-first approach) or eCAS before MT (eCAS-first approach). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to estimate the effect of the retrograde versus the anterograde approach on procedure-related and clinical outcome measures. These included the mTICI score 2b-3, other procedure-related parameters and adverse events after the endovascular procedure, and the ordinal distribution of the 90-day mRS scores., Results: A total of 295 consecutive patients were initially enrolled. Among these, 208 (70%) received MT before eCAS. After PSM, 56 pairs of patients were available for analysis. In the matched population, the MT-first approach resulted in a higher rate of successful intracranial recanalization (91% versus 73% in the eCAS-first approach, p=0.025) and shorter groin-to-reperfusion time (72 ± 38 minutes versus 93 ± 50 minutes in the anterograde approach, p=0.017). Despite a higher rate of efficient recanalization in the MT-first group, we did not observe a significant difference concerning the ordinal distribution of the 90-day mRS scores. Rates of procedure-related adverse events and occurrence of both parenchymal hemorrhage type 1 and type 2 were comparable., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that in patients with TL undergoing endovascular treatment, prioritizing the intracranial occlusion is associated with an increased rate of efficient MT and faster recanalization time. However, this strategy does not bring an advantage in long-term clinical outcome. Future controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment technique., Abbreviations: AIS = acute ischemic stroke; eCAS = emergent carotid stenting; ICA = internal carotid artery; GTR = groin-torecanalization; IVT = intravenous thrombolysis; LVO = large vessel occlusion; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MT = mechanical thrombectomy; PSM = propensity score matching; SMD = standardized mean difference; STROBE = STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology; TL = tandem lesion., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to the content of this article., (© 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)