Search

STUDY QUESTION Does endometriosis prevalence differ in patients with obstructive Müllerian anomalies (OMA) versus those with nonobstructive Müllerian anomalies (NOMA), and in patients with NOMA versus those without Müllerian anomalies? SUMMARY ANSWER The quantitative synthesis of published data demonstrates a substantially increased prevalence of endometriosis in patients with OMA compared with those with NOMA, and a similar prevalence in patients with NOMA and those without Müllerian anomalies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The pathogenesis of endometriosis has not been definitively clarified yet. A higher prevalence of endometriosis in patients with OMA than in those with NOMA would support the retrograde menstruation (RM)/implantation theory, whereas a higher prevalence of endometriosis in the NOMA group than in the group without Müllerian anomalies would support the embryonic remnants/celomic metaplasia hypothesis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This systematic review with meta-analysis was restricted to full-length, English-language articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 1980 and 2023. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched using the keyword 'endometriosis' in combination with 'Müllerian anomalies', 'obstructive Müllerian anomalies', 'female genital malformations', 'retrograde menstruation', 'infertility', 'pelvic pain', and 'classification'. References from relevant publications were screened, and PubMed's 'similar articles' and 'cited by' functions were used. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Studies were selected if they reported the prevalence of surgically confirmed endometriosis in either individuals with OMA compared to those with NOMA, or patients with NOMA compared to those without Müllerian anomalies. Cohort and case-control studies and case series were deemed eligible for inclusion. Noncomparative studies, studies not reporting both the number of individuals with endometriosis and the total number of those with Müllerian anomalies or with other gynecological conditions, those including exclusively data on patients with absent or uncertain menstrual function (e.g. complete Müllerian agenesis category), or with imperforate hymen were excluded. Two reviewers independently abstracted data. The risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Exposures tool. The overall certainty of the evidence was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Seven retrospective studies were included. The overall mean estimate of endometriosis prevalence was 47% (95% CI, 36–58%) in patients with OMA, and 19% (95% CI, 15–24%) in patients with NOMA, with a common odds ratio (OR) of 4.72 (95% CI, 2.54–8.77). The overall mean estimate of endometriosis prevalence in patients with NOMA was 23% (95% CI, 20–27%), and that in patients without Müllerian anomalies was 21% (95% CI, 20–22%), with a common OR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.57–1.58). The overall certainty of the evidence according to GRADE guidelines was judged as low for both comparisons. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION Some NOMA subtypes may create a partial obstacle to menstrual efflux and/or generate dysfunctional myometrial contractions that favor transtubal reflux, thus increasing the risk of endometriosis and limiting the difference between OMA and NOMA. As infertility and pelvic pain are strongly associated with endometriosis, women with these symptoms are inappropriate controls. Confounding by indication could explain the lack of difference in endometriosis prevalence between patients with NOMA and those without Müllerian anomalies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The results of this meta-analysis support the validity of the RM theory but do not definitively rule out alternative hypotheses. Thus, RM may be considered the initiator for the development of endometriotic lesions, while not excluding the contribution of both inheritable and tissue-specific genetic and epigenetic modifications as disease-promoting factors. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No funding was received for this review. P.Ve. is a member of the Editorial Board of Human Reproduction Open , the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada , and the International Editorial Board of Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica ; has received royalties from Wolters Kluwer for chapters on endometriosis management in the clinical decision support resource UpToDate; and maintains both a public and private gynecological practice. E.S. discloses payments from Ferring for research grants and honoraria from Merck-Serono for lectures. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest. REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Pathogenesis of endometriosis is still unclear and a role of both innate and adaptive immune system has been postulated. Some recent findings have revealed an increased risk to have concomitant autoimmune disease in women with endometriosis, but no study so far has investigated whether this association could affect endometriosis severity and stage. We retrospectively reviewed medical patients’ notes of women with a confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis who referred to our endometriosis outpatient clinic between January 2015 and December 2019. Cases (endometriosis and an autoimmune disease) were matched in a 1:3 ratio by age and study period with controls (endometriosis without history of autoimmunity). At univariate logistic analysis, concomitant autoimmunity (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.64–4.21, p

This article discusses a case study of a female patient and her affected niece who have a homozygous frameshift variant of the CLPP gene, which is associated with severe Perrault syndrome. The proband has symptoms including hearing loss, primary ovarian insufficiency, abnormal brain white matter, and developmental delay. The study describes the genetic variant and its predicted effects, as well as the clinical features of the patients. The authors suggest that severe Perrault syndrome may result from biallelic null-alleles of CLPP, while hypomorphic variants may be associated with milder symptoms. The research was supported by various funding sources and the authors declare no conflicts of interest. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Infertile women carrying ovarian endometriomas can be managed either with surgery or by in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The aim of this study was to compare ovarian responsiveness to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in assisted reproduction techniques (ART) in infertile women carrying small intact endometriomas and those managed by endometrioma cystectomy or CO2 fiber laser ablation., Methods: Retrospective case-control study of prospectively collected data including women underwent ART for endometriosis-related infertility. The study group consisted of infertile women undergoing endometriomas CO2 fiber laser vaporization before ART ("ART after laser CO2" group). Controls were infertile women with endometrioma managed by cystectomy before ART ("ART after cystectomy" group) and infertile women with small endometriomas undergoing ART as first approach ("ART only" group)., Results: Of the 86 included patients, 27 (31.4%) belonged to "ART after laser CO2" group, 37 (43%) to "ART after cystectomy" group and 22 (25.6%) to "ART only" group. Surgical groups had larger endometriomas than patients referred to "ART only" group. No between-groups differences were observed in terms of COS protocol, gonadotropins starting and total doses and length of COS. While women belonged to "ART after cystectomy" group had fewer recruited follicles (P=0.014), oocytes (P=0.042), MII oocytes (P=0.042) and formed embryos (P=0.004) compared to women of "ART only" group, no significant differences were found between patients of "ART only" group "ART after laser CO2" group. A greater number of good-quality embryos were observed in surgical groups. No between-groups differences were found in clinical pregnancy rates., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate encouraging findings on IVF/ICSI outcomes after laser CO2 endometrioma ablation in terms of both quantity and quality of developed embryos.

Background: Data about endometrioma ablation using energies with little thermal spread reported good results in terms of ovarian reserve and postoperative pregnancy rates. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of one step CO2 fiber laser vaporization for endometrioma on subsequent controlled ovarian stimulation., Methods: This prospective observational cohort study included a consecutive series of infertile patients who have undergone CO2 fibre laser vaporization for endometrioma treatment. The primary endpoint was to assess the number of follicles per ovary growing during controlled ovarian stimulation. The secondary endpoints included the number of oocytes retrieved, the total number of embryos obtained and the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per patient treated., Results: Twenty-six patients underwent assisted reproductive technology after surgery for endometriosis-related infertility. In unilateral operated ovaries at the end of controlled ovarian stimulation no significant differences emerged from comparison of total recruited follicles in the operated ovary and in the contralateral ovary (P=0.55). If considering only bilateral endometriomas, the number of recruited follicles at the end of controlled ovarian stimulation was similar in both operated ovaries (P=0.79). The number of cumulative clinical pregnancies was 15 (57.7%; 95% CI: 38.5-76.9%). When comparing women aged ≤35 years to those aged >35 years, controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes were significantly higher in the younger patients. Age at the time of assisted reproductive technology was the only independent predictor for follicular growth during ovarian hyperstimulation (95% CI: -1.27 to -0.116, P=0.027)., Conclusions: CO2 laser-treated endometrioma is associated with favorable reproductive assisted reproductive technology outcomes.