Search

Background: With the increase in immunosuppressed patients and antimicrobial misuse, Non-diphtheriae Corynebacterium species (NDC spp.) have risen as opportunistic pathogens in hospitalized patients. The current work aimed at comparing Vitek 2C automated identification cards versus MALDI-TOF (Matrix-associated laser-induced desorption ionization-time of flight) as the gold standard method for the identification of different NDC spp. and determining the antimicrobial susceptibility of NDC spp. by the disc diffusion method for proper management of patients. Methods: Thirty NDC spp. isolates were subjected to identification by MALDI-TOF MS and Vitek 2C and antibiotic susceptibility testing by the disc diffusion method. Results: Our study showed that Corynebacterium (C.) striatum was the most commonly isolated species (83.3%), followed by C. amycolatum (10%). 36.7 % of the isolates were recovered from blood culture while 20 % were recovered from deep wounds. As regard isolate identification by Vitek-2C ANC ID CARD compared to MALDI-TOF as the gold standard method, the agreement was 86.7%. Regarding the antimicrobial susceptibility by disc diffusion method, all the isolates showed increased resistance against penicillin (100%), ciprofloxacin (70%), gentamicin (93.3%), tetracycline (76.6%), and clindamycin (70%). On the other hand, vancomycin and linezolid showed promising results where 100 % of the isolates were susceptible. Conclusion: We spotlight that NDC spp. is not viewed as a contaminant organism anymore, particularly in immunosuppressed patients. Timely identification, proper clinical correlation, and appropriate therapeutic intervention can lead to favorable outcomes.

Abstract Background This work aims to develop clinical practice recommendations for the management of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Results Fourteen expert panels had completed the two rounds of surveys. After the end of round 2, recommendations were released and distributed on 11 domains. The percentage of the agreement on the recommendations was 92.3% to 100%. All 11 key questions were answered at the end of the second round with agreement. Conclusion This guideline tried to tackle the gaps in research that limit treatment options. Stratifying the patients according to their disease domains has helped to set up sequential management pathways for each domain.

Abstract Background Despite the recent advances in the management of inflammatory arthritis, a considerable proportion of arthritis patients remain symptomatic. This cohort has recently been identified as ‘difficult to treat’ (D2T). In view of the limited evidence base, management of these patients has been a challenge particularly in view of its associated significant economic health burden. A better understanding of the D2T may help recognise or develop new therapeutic targets and facilitate earlier intervention in the disease course to prevent the progression of such condition. The aim of this work is to address the unmet needs in the management of D2T arthritis and develop a comprehensive approach towards the identification and proper assessment of those patients. Results At the completion of round 3 Delphi process, a total of 20 items were obtained and divided into 5 domains. From 88.9 to 100% of respondents agreed with the recommendations (ranks 7–9). All 20 of the clinical standards that the scientific committee identified were agreed upon in terms of wording, recommendation grade, and level of evidence (i.e. 75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed). Conclusion D2T inflammatory arthritis remains a relevant clinical challenge, despite the endorsement of the treat-to-target approach and the availability of a broad range of targeted arthritis medications. This study provided a comprehensive definition of the condition to facilitate the identification of this patients’ group. It also highlighted the goals and principles aiming at providing an effective framework for D2T assessment, closely monitor and set up a strategy to intervene in standard clinical practice.

Abstract Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by having varying clinical presentation, severity, unpredictable course as well as outcomes. Recent disease-modifying conventional and biologic agents have enhanced rates of attaining both short- and long-term management goals, including minimization of glucocorticoid dose and use. This study was carried out to develop an up-to-date evidence-based, consensus on clinical practice guidelines for treat-to-target management of systemic lupus erythematosus in adults. Results The response rate to the online questionnaires, sent to the expert panel who participated in the three rounds, was 95.5%. At the end of round 3, a total of 14 recommendation sections were proposed for the T2T management of patients with SLE. Agreement with the recommendations (rank 7–9) ranged from 90.9–100%. Consensus was reached (i.e., ≥ 80% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed) on the proposed statements. Conclusion These recommendations provide a consensus on the treat-to-target management of patients with SLE. They provide strategies to reach optimal outcomes in common clinical scenarios, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.

Background: Malaria is a severe disease, so delay in treatment could increase morbidity and mortality. World Health Organization recommends confirmation of the diagnosis by laboratory test before initiation of therapy. Smear microscopy and polymerase chain reaction are methods approved by WHO for diagnosing malaria, but they are time-consuming, operator-dependent, and require laboratory staff training. WHO has recommended the Blood-based Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) as an acceptable method for diagnosing malaria. It provides rapid results and can be performed with limited resources. Methods: Four hundred and fourteen febrile cases admitted to Khartoum North General Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan during January 2021 - June 2021 with clinical suspicion of malaria were examined for the presence of asexual forms of Plasmodium falciparum in peripheral blood smears. Blood smear microscopy-positive patients who matched the acceptance criteria were included, while negative patients were selected as control cases. Blood and urine samples were examined with the same RDT kits designed for blood. Results: Fifty-eight blood smear-positive cases and 50 febrile blood smear-negative cases were enrolled in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of urine-based RDT were 82.76% and 92.00%, respectively, while blood-based RDT was 96.55% and 96.00%. Conclusion: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of urine-based RDT through comparison with blood-based RDT and the use of blood smear microscopy as the reference method. Although the results showed acceptable performance of both tests, more extensive sample size studies should be conducted to consider urine samples as an alternative sample for diagnosing Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

Objective: The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on an updated version of the recommendations for the diagnosis and Treat-to-Target management of osteoporosis that is effective and safe for individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G4-G5D/kidney transplant. Methods: Delphi process was implemented (3 rounds) to establish a consensus on 10 clinical domains: (1) study targets, (2) risk factors, (3) diagnosis, (4) case stratification, (5) treatment targets, (6) investigations, (7) medical management, (8) monitoring, (9) management of special groups, (10) fracture liaison service. After each round, statements were retired, modified, or added in view of the experts’ suggestions, and the percent agreement was calculated. Statements receiving rates of 7–9 by more than 75% of experts’ votes were considered as achieving consensus. Results: The surveys were sent to an expert panel (n = 26), of whom 23 participated in the three rounds (2 were international experts and 21 were national). Most of the participants were rheumatologists (87%), followed by nephrologists (8.7%), and geriatric physicians (4.3%). Eighteen recommendations, categorized into 10 domains, were obtained. Agreement with the recommendations (rank 7–9) ranged from 80 to 100%. Consensus was reached on the wording of all 10 clinical domains identified by the scientific committee. An algorithm for the management of osteoporosis in CKD has been suggested. Conclusion: A panel of international and national experts established a consensus regarding the management of osteoporosis in CKD patients. The developed recommendations provide a comprehensive approach to assessing and managing osteoporosis for all healthcare professionals involved in its management.

Background: The prevalence of fungal keratitis has risen in recent years significantly. To avoid additional complications, diagnosing and treating fungal keratitis is crucial. This study aims to measure the efficacy of a calcofluor white (CFW) stain for the quick diagnosis of fungal keratitis and to contrast the positive rates, sensitivity, and specificity with a 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH)-based smear and culture technique. Methods:From individuals with clinically suspected corneal ulcers, 30 corneal scrapings had been collected. Data on demographics had been analyzed. Results: Of the 30 patients, 40% were women and 60% were men. There was a 1.5:1 man-to-woman ratio. The age of patients ranged from 29 to 71 years (mean 46.67 ± 10.90). The age presentation of those between the ages of 41 and 50 years was the most frequent (36.7%). The majority of cases were farmers (43.3%). Trauma was the most common predisposing factor (46.6%). Twenty-four (80%) cases were culture positive. Eleven (36.7%) were fungal, 13 (43.3%) were bacterial and 6 (20%) showed no growth. Fusarium was the most common fungal isolate (36.4%), followed by Aspergillus (27.3%). While Staphylococcus aureus was the most common bacterial isolate (46.2%), followed by Pseudomonas (38.4%). The sensitivity of KOH wet mount and CFW stain was 72.7% and 90.9%, respectively. The specificity of both KOH wet mount and CFW stain was 100%. Conclusion:The early diagnosis of fungal keratitis can be made rapidly by direct microscopic examination of fungal elements using CFW stain. When diagnosing fungal keratitis, CFW has higher sensitivity to KOH.

Abstract Background Busy rheumatologists, and busy patients as well as policy makers, require accurate, succinct, transparent, easily digested summaries of evidence and recommendations for management. Our objective was to develop an up-to-date evidence-based, consensus, clinical practice guidelines for treat-to-target management of rheumatoid arthritis in adults. Results Ninety-four (94.7%) of the expert committee completed the 2-round e-Delphi surveys. A total of 33 recommendation items, addressing the main rheumatoid arthritis (RA) domains, were identified. The level of agreement (rate 7–9), for the statements which reached consensus, ranged from 85 to 100%. Consensus was achieved on the wording of all the clinical practice guidelines identified by the scientific committee. A management algorithm for the management of rheumatoid arthritis have been developed. Conclusion These updated recommendations reflect the most recent evidence for the management of RA. It also outlines the multidisciplinary team role in enhancing the RA patients’ care. The recommendations offer strategies to achieve optimum treat-to-target outcomes. However, standards of care are defined based on the clinical data obtained for individual patients and are prone to modification. High-quality, broad scope evidence-based clinical practice guidelines offer a path for bridging the gap between best practice, policy, local settings and patients’ choice.

Abstract Background This is a Clinical Practice Guideline update released by the Egyptian Academy of Bone Health and Metabolic Bone Diseases. It does not replace the clinical practice guidelines published for the treatment of osteoporosis in 2021, but it entails specific recommendations and selective criteria for romosozumab as another pharmacological agent for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. It has been issued, in part, due to the imminent approval of romosozumab in Egypt. Main text The guideline recommends the use of romosozumab, for up to 1 year, for the reduction of vertebral, hip, and non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis at very high risk of fracture/imminent fracture risk: defined as T-score less than − 2.5 and a prior hip or vertebral fracture in the past 24 months or a very high fracture risk, as identified by FRAX (FRAX major osteoporosis fracture > 30%, FRAX hip fracture > 4.5%). The recommended dosage of romosozumab is 210 mg monthly by subcutaneous injection for 12 months. For osteoporotic postmenopausal women who have completed a 12-month course of romosozumab, treatment with an anti-resorptive osteoporosis therapy is recommended to maintain bone mineral density gains and reduce fracture risk. The treatment is not recommended for women at high risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke, which includes those with prior myocardial infarction or stroke. In conclusion, strategies to osteoporosis management have been highly diversified, with bone health specialists have become able to set up treatment plan tailored to the individual patient’s requirement. Patients with severe osteoporosis at very high fracture risk need stronger therapeutic regimens to start with. Romosozumab endorses bone formation and suppresses bone resorption, leading to a greater anabolic window and a superior positive impact on bone mineral density.

Abstract Background Lupus nephritis (LN) affects a substantial number of the patients living with Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), representing a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients with lupus nephritis should be referred to a lupus nephritis expert who can confirm the diagnosis, assess the level of disease activity, and offer guidance on treatment and monitoring of the disease, as well as its consequences and side effects. The aim of this guideline was to develop recommendations for the management of adult lupus patients, including lupus nephritis diagnosis, assessment, and monitoring. Nineteen key clinical questions were identified by scientific committee according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Timing (PICOT) approach. Literature review team performed a systematic review to summarize evidence advocating the benefits and harms of available pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for LN. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated. The level of evidence was determined for each section using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (CEBM) system. A 2-round Delphi process was conducted with 24 experts. All rounds were conducted online. A consensus was achieved on the direction and the strength of the recommendations. Results An online questionnaire was sent to an expert panel who participated in the two rounds (response rate 100%). At the end of round 2, a total of 19 recommendation items, categorized into 11 sections to address the main LN categories, were obtained. The percentage of those who agreed with the recommendations (ranks 7–9) ranged from 90.5 to 100%. The phrasing of all 19 clinical standards identified by the scientific committee was agreed upon (i.e., 75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed). Conclusion These recommendations provide an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of lupus nephritis and strategies to reach optimal treat to target outcomes in common clinical scenarios, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion. Best treatment decisions should be tailored to each individual patient situation.

Abstract Background Nephritis is known to be one of the most serious complications of lupus and a strong predictor of poor outcome. This study was carried out aiming at setting up an up-to-date recommendation for the management of women living with lupus nephritis and planning for a family throughout conception, pregnancy, and the postpartum period. Ten key clinical questions were identified by the scientific committee according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Timing (PICOT) approach. The literature review team performed a systematic review to summarise evidence advocating the benefits and harms of available pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for women living with lupus nephritis (LN) and planning for a family. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated. The level of evidence was determined for each section using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) system. A 2-round Delphi process was conducted with 24 experts. All rounds were conducted online. A consensus was achieved on the direction and the strength of the recommendations. Results An online questionnaire was sent to an expert panel who participated in the two rounds (response rate 100%). At the end of round 2, a total of 20 recommendation items, categorised into 10 domains to address the main LN with pregnancy categories, were obtained. The percentage of those who agreed with the recommendations (rank 7–9) ranged from 88.5 to 100%. On the phrasing of all the clinical standards defined by the scientific committee, a consensus was reached (i.e., 75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed). An algorithm for the management of LN with pregnancy has been suggested. Conclusion These recommendations provide an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of LN with pregnancy and strategies to reach optimal outcomes for both the mother and newborn in common clinical scenarios, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion. Best treatment decisions should be tailored to each individual patient’s situation.

Abstract Background We aimed to provide up-to-date, evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for Treat-to-Target management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and associated clinical manifestations. In this recommendations, 14 key clinical questions were identified by scientific committee according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Timing (PICOT) approach. Literature Review team performed a systematic review to summarize evidence advocating the benefits and harms of available pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies for psoriatic arthritis. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated. The level of evidence was determined for each section using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (CEBM) system. A 3-round Delphi process was conducted with 19 experts whom were drawn from different governorates and health centers across Egypt with diverse in their experiences, including private, governmental workplace, tertiary university hospitals, and insurance hospitals. All rounds were conducted online. A consensus was achieved on the direction and the strength of the recommendations. Results An online questionnaire was sent to an expert panel who participated in the three rounds (response rate 100%). At the end of round 3, a total of 51 recommendation items, categorized into 6 sections to address the main 6 psoriatic arthritis categories, were obtained. Agreement with the recommendations (rank 7–9) ranged from 89.5 to 100%. Consensus was reached (i.e., ≥ 75%of respondents strongly agreed or agreed) on the wording of all the 51 clinical standards identified by the scientific committee. Algorithms for the management of psoriatic arthritis have been suggested. Conclusion These recommendations provide an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis and strategies to reach optimal treat-to-target outcomes in in common clinical scenarios, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion. Best treatment decisions should be tailored to each individual patient situation.

Abstract Introduction New therapies, management approaches, and evidence regarding the management of gout have become available over the past years. This triggered the need for an updated recommendation for gout management. Through an up-to-date consensus evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the management of gout including recommendations for management of gout flares, optimum usage of urate lowering therapy for chronic gout, as well as patient education and lifestyle guidance. A wide systematic literature review was performed, and evidence-based recommendations were extrapolated, based on 16-key questions identified according to population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) approach. These were evaluated by a panel consisted of 17 rheumatology experts via online surveys over a 2-round Delphi process. The purpose of this study is to offer an updated, consensus-evidence-based, and in the meantime patient-focused, expert recommendations for the treat-to-target approach of gout management. Results Results revealed that after round 2 ended, a total of 30-recommendation items, categorized into 10 domains, were obtained. Agreement with the recommendations (rank 7–9) ranged from 90 to 100%. Consensus was reached (i.e., ≥ 75% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed) on the wording, the grade of recommendation, and level of evidence of all the 30 clinical standards identified by the scientific committee. Conclusions This guideline provides updated evidence-based recommendations for the prevention and treatment of acute as well as chronic gout. This guideline provides an approach for physicians and patients making decisions on the management of gout. It will also facilitate improvement and uniformity of care.

Abstract Background Because of the subjective character of symptoms, absence of a diagnostic test, modest response to treatments, and, at times, patient reports of important functional disability, fibromyalgia remains a challenge for the treating health care professionals in the standard clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop an up-to-date consensus and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for a treat-to-target management of fibromyalgia. Fifteen key clinical questions were identified by a scientific committee according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) approach. A literature review team performed a systematic review to summarize the evidence advocating the benefits and harms of available pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for fibromyalgia. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated. The level of evidence was determined for each section using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (CEBM) system. A 3-round Delphi process was conducted with 16 experts. All rounds were conducted online. A consensus was achieved on the direction and the strength of the recommendations. Results An online questionnaire was sent to an expert panel who participated in the three rounds (response rate 100%). At the end of round 3, a total of fifteen recommendation items, categorized into 10 sections to address the main fibromyalgia categories, were obtained. Agreement with the recommendations (ranks 7–9) ranged from 85 to 100%. Consensus was reached (i.e., ≥ 80% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed) on the wording of all the 15 clinical standards identified by the scientific committee. An algorithm for the management of fibromyalgia has been suggested. Conclusions These recommendations provide an updated consensus on both the non-pharmacological and the pharmacological treatments of fibromyalgia. The provided strategies to reach optimal treat-to-target outcomes in common clinical scenarios are based on a combination of evidence and expert opinions. Best treatment decisions should be tailored to each individual patient situation.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.