300 results on '"Salim S. Hayek"'
Search Results
2. SuPAR mediates viral response proteinuria by rapidly changing podocyte function
- Author
-
Changli Wei, Prasun K. Datta, Florian Siegerist, Jing Li, Sudhini Yashwanth, Kwi Hye Koh, Nicholas W. Kriho, Anis Ismail, Shengyuan Luo, Tracy Fischer, Kyle T. Amber, David Cimbaluk, Alan Landay, Nicole Endlich, Jay Rappaport, Michigan Medicine COVID−19 Investigators, Salim S. Hayek, and Jochen Reiser
- Subjects
Science - Abstract
Abstract Elevation in soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) and proteinuria are common signs in patients with moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here we characterize a new type of proteinuria originating as part of a viral response. Inoculation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes increased suPAR levels and glomerulopathy in African green monkeys. Using an engineered mouse model with high suPAR expression, inhaled variants of SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein elicite proteinuria that could be blocked by either suPAR antibody or SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. In a cohort of 1991 COVID-19 patients, suPAR levels exhibit a stepwise association with proteinuria in non-Omicron, but not in Omicron infections, supporting our findings of biophysical and functional differences between variants of SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein and their binding to podocyte integrins. These insights are not limited to SARS-CoV-2 and define viral response proteinuria (VRP) as an innate immune mechanism and co-activation of podocyte integrins.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Biomarkers of chronic inflammation and cognitive decline: A prospective observational study
- Author
-
Bhavna A. Guduguntla, Alexi Vasbinder, Elizabeth Anderson, Tariq U. Azam, Pennelope Blakely, Noah J. Webster, Richard Gonzalez, Toni Atonucci, Judith L. Heidebrink, Bruno Giordani, Laura Zahodne, Benjamin M. Hampstead, Kristine J. Ajrouch, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
Alzheimer's disease ,cognition ,dementia ,hs‐CRP ,suPAR ,Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system ,RC346-429 ,Geriatrics ,RC952-954.6 - Abstract
Abstract We sought to determine whether the biomarkers of chronic inflammation predict cognitive decline in a prospective observational study. We measured baseline serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and high sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) levels in 282 participants of the University of Michigan Memory and Aging Project. Cognitive function was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale for up to five time points. SuPAR and hs‐CRP levels were not significantly higher in participants with mild cognitive impairment (n = 97) or dementia (n = 59), compared to those with normal cognitive function (n = 126). Overall, 14% of participants experienced significant cognitive decline over the study period. The change in MoCA or CDR scores over time did not differ significantly according to baseline suPAR or hs‐CRP levels. Chronic systemic inflammation, as measured by serum suPAR or hs‐CRP levels, is unlikely to contribute significantly to cognitive decline.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Cardiovascular Risk Stratification of Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The CARE‐BMT Risk Score
- Author
-
Alexi Vasbinder, Tonimarie Catalan, Elizabeth Anderson, Catherine Chu, Megan Kotzin, Danielle Murphy, Halle Cheplowitz, Kristen Machado Diaz, Brayden Bitterman, Ian Pizzo, Yiyuan Huang, Jeffrey Xie, Christopher W. Hoeger, Rayan Kaakati, Hanna P. Berlin, Husam Shadid, Daniel Perry, Michael Pan, Radhika Takiar, Kishan Padalia, Jamie Mills, Chelsea Meloche, Alina Bardwell, Matthew Rochlen, Pennelope Blakely, Monika Leja, Mousumi Banerjee, Mary Riwes, John Magenau, Sarah Anand, Monalisa Ghosh, Attaphol Pawarode, Gregory Yanik, Sunita Nathan, John Maciejewski, Tochukwu Okwuosa, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
atrial fibrillation ,bone marrow transplant ,cardiovascular disease ,heart failure ,hematopoietic stem cell transplant ,random forest ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background Evidence guiding the pre‐hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) cardiovascular evaluation is limited. We sought to derive and validate a pre‐HSCT score for the cardiovascular risk stratification of HSCT candidates. Methods and Results We leveraged the CARE‐BMT (Cardiovascular Registry in Bone Marrow Transplantation) study, a contemporary multicenter observational study of adult patients who underwent autologous or allogeneic HSCT between 2008 and 2019 (N=2435; mean age at transplant of 55 years; 4.9% Black). We identified the subset of variables most predictive of post‐HSCT cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, atrial fibrillation or flutter, and sustained ventricular tachycardia. We then developed a point‐based risk score using the hazard ratios obtained from Cox proportional hazards modeling. The score was externally validated in a separate cohort of 919 HSCT recipients (mean age at transplant 54 years; 20.4% Black). The risk score included age, transplant type, race, coronary artery disease, heart failure, peripheral artery disease, creatinine, triglycerides, and prior anthracycline dose. Risk scores were grouped as low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk, with the 5‐year cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events being 4.0%, 10.3%, and 22.4%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating curves for predicting cardiovascular events at 100 days, 5 and 10 years post‐HSCT were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59–0.70), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69–0.76), and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69–0.81), respectively. The model performed equally well in autologous and allogeneic recipients, as well as in the validation cohort. Conclusions The CARE‐BMT risk score is easy to calculate and could help guide referrals of high‐risk HSCT recipients to cardiovascular specialists before transplant and guide long‐term monitoring.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Immune Activation Mediates the Association of Advanced Hepatic Fibrosis With Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
- Author
-
Vardhmaan Jain, Anurag Mehta, Terence B. Lee, Chang Liu, Nicholas W. S. Chew, Yi‐An Ko, Matthew E. Gold, Daniel A. Gold, Nishant Vatsa, Shivang R. Desai, Jonathan H. Kim, Alireza Rahbar, Yazan Haroun, Kiran Ejaz, Salim S. Hayek, Mohammad S. Siddiqui, Fadi N. Salloum, Laurence S. Sperling, Arun J. Sanyal, and Arshed A. Quyyumi
- Subjects
advanced hepatic fibrosis ,coronary artery disease ,hsCRP ,immune activation ,suPAR ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background Literature suggests a bidirectional association between advanced hepatic fibrosis (AHF) and coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated the association of AHF with immune activation, systemic inflammation, and adverse outcomes in patients with CAD. Methods and Results A fibrosis‐4 index cutoff value ≥2.67 was used to define AHF. Circulating levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and hsCRP (high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein) were measured as markers for immune activation and systemic inflammation, respectively. The relationship of AHF with soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, hsCRP, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes was evaluated. Among 3406 participants with CAD, 479 had AHF. Participants with AHF were older; were less likely to be Black individuals; and had a lower body mass index, worse renal function, and a prior history of heart failure. In multivariable linear regression models adjusted for clinical and demographic confounders, participants with AHF had 15.6% higher soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and 24.0% higher hsCRP levels. They were more likely to experience the following adverse outcomes: all‐cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.57 ([95% CI, 1.29–1.92]; P
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Metastatic melanoma of the heart: Retrospective cohort study and systematic review of prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes
- Author
-
Alexander M. Balinski, Alexi L. Vasbinder, Connor C. Kerndt, Tonimarie C. Catalan, Nathan P. Parry, Rafey A. Rehman, Pennelope Blakely, Raymond Y. Yeow, Monika J. Leja, Christopher D. Lao, Leslie A. Fecher, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
epidemiology ,melanoma ,metastasis ,prognosis ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background Cardiac metastasis of melanoma is rare and typically diagnosed post‐mortem. Here we perform a retrospective cohort study and systematic review of patients with metastatic melanoma to characterize prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of cardiac metastasis. Methods We reviewed the electronic medical records of all outpatients with metastatic melanoma who underwent evaluation at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor from January 2009 to January 2022, identifying patients with a clinical or histopathologic diagnosis of cardiac metastasis. We performed a systematic review of the literature to summarize the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with melanoma and cardiac metastasis. Results Overall, 23 of 1254 (1.8%) patients with metastatic melanoma were diagnosed with cardiac metastasis. Cardiac metastasis was reported in the right ventricle (65%), left ventricle (35%), and right atrium (35%). A total of 11 (48%) patients experienced at least one cardiovascular complication after the diagnosis of cardiac metastasis, the most common being arrhythmia (30%), heart failure (22%), and pericardial effusion (17%). Immunotherapy was more commonly used in patients with cardiac metastasis (80% vs 65%; p = 0.005). Mortality at 2‐years post‐diagnosis was higher for patients with cardiac metastasis compared to those without (59% vs 37%; p = 0.034). Progression of malignancy was the underlying cause of death of all patients. Conclusions Cardiac metastasis occurs in
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. COVID-19 severity and cardiovascular outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease
- Author
-
Melissa Y.Y. Moey, Cassandra Hennessy, Benjamin French, Jeremy L. Warner, Matthew D. Tucker, Daniel J. Hausrath, Dimpy P. Shah, Jeanne M. DeCara, Ziad Bakouny, Chris Labaki, Toni K. Choueiri, Susan Dent, Nausheen Akhter, Roohi Ismail-Khan, Lisa Tachiki, David Slosky, Tamar S. Polonsky, Joy A. Awosika, Audrey Crago, Trisha Wise-Draper, Nino Balanchivadze, Clara Hwang, Leslie A. Fecher, Cyndi Gonzalez Gomez, Brandon Hayes-Lattin, Michael J. Glover, Sumit A. Shah, Dharmesh Gopalakrishnan, Elizabeth A. Griffiths, Daniel H. Kwon, Vadim S. Koshkin, Sana Mahmood, Babar Bashir, Taylor Nonato, Pedram Razavi, Rana R. McKay, Gayathri Nagaraj, Eric Oligino, Matthew Puc, Polina Tregubenko, Elizabeth M. Wulff-Burchfield, Zhuoer Xie, Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, Dimitrios Farmakiotis, Elizabeth J. Klein, Elizabeth V. Robilotti, Gregory J. Riely, Jean-Bernard Durand, Salim S. Hayek, Lavanya Kondapalli, Stephanie Berg, Timothy E. O'Connor, Mehmet A. Bilen, Cecilia Castellano, Melissa K. Accordino, Blau Sibel, Lisa B. Weissmann, Chinmay Jani, Daniel B. Flora, Lawrence Rudski, Miriam Santos Dutra, Bouganim Nathaniel, Erika Ruíz-García, Diana Vilar-Compte, Shilpa Gupta, Alicia Morgans, and Anju Nohria
- Subjects
COVID-19 outcomes ,Cardio-oncology ,Cardiovascular disease ,Cancer ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Background: Data regarding outcomes among patients with cancer and co-morbid cardiovascular disease (CVD)/cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) after SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited. Objectives: To compare Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related complications among cancer patients with and without co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from 03/17/2020 to 12/31/2021. CVD/CVRF was defined as established CVD or no established CVD, male ≥ 55 or female ≥ 60 years, and one additional CVRF. The primary endpoint was an ordinal COVID-19 severity outcome including need for hospitalization, supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation, ICU or mechanical ventilation plus vasopressors, and death. Secondary endpoints included incident adverse CV events. Ordinal logistic regression models estimated associations of CVD/CVRF with COVID-19 severity. Effect modification by recent cancer therapy was evaluated. Results: Among 10,876 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with cancer (median age 65 [IQR 54–74] years, 53% female, 52% White), 6253 patients (57%) had co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Co-morbid CVD/CVRF was associated with higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted OR: 1.25 [95% CI 1.11–1.40]). Adverse CV events were significantly higher in patients with CVD/CVRF (all p
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. suPAR links a dysregulated immune response to tissue inflammation and sepsis-induced acute kidney injury
- Author
-
Christian Nusshag, Changli Wei, Eunsil Hahm, Salim S. Hayek, Jing Li, Beata Samelko, Christoph Rupp, Roman Szudarek, Claudius Speer, Florian Kälble, Matthias Schaier, Florian Uhle, Felix C.F. Schmitt, Mascha O. Fiedler, Ellen Krautkrämer, Yanxia Cao, Ricardo Rodriguez, Uta Merle, Jesper Eugen-Olsen, Martin Zeier, Markus A. Weigand, Christian Morath, Thorsten Brenner, and Jochen Reiser
- Subjects
Inflammation ,Nephrology ,Medicine - Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to sepsis results in poor outcomes and conventional kidney function indicators lack diagnostic value. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an innate immune–derived molecule implicated in inflammatory organ damage. We characterized the diagnostic ability of longitudinal serum suPAR levels to discriminate severity and course of sepsis-induced AKI (SI-AKI) in 200 critically ill patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria. The pathophysiologic relevance of varying suPAR levels in SI-AKI was explored in a polymicrobial sepsis model in WT, (s)uPAR-knockout, and transgenic suPAR-overexpressing mice. At all time points studied, suPAR provided a robust classification of SI-AKI disease severity, with improved prediction of renal replacement therapy (RRT) and mortality compared with established kidney biomarkers. Patients with suPAR levels of greater than 12.7 ng/mL were at highest risk for RRT or death, with an adjusted odds ratio of 7.48 (95% CI, 3.00–18.63). suPAR deficiency protected mice against SI-AKI. suPAR-overexpressing mice exhibited greater kidney damage and poorer survival through inflamed kidneys, accompanied by local upregulation of potent chemoattractants and pronounced kidney T cell infiltration. Hence, suPAR allows for an innate immune–derived and kidney function–independent staging of SI-AKI and offers improved longitudinal risk stratification. suPAR promotes T cell–based kidney inflammation, while suPAR deficiency improves SI-AKI.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Site-level variability in the processes of care and outcomes over time among patients with COVID-19 and myocardial injury: Insights from the American Heart Association's COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry
- Author
-
Yasser M. Sammour, John A. Spertus, Kevin Kennedy, David A. Morrow, Lori B. Daniels, Phil Jones, Heather Alger, Laura Stevens, Alpesh Shah, Sachin S. Goel, James A. de Lemos, Salim S. Hayek, Nadia R. Sutton, and Neal S. Kleiman
- Subjects
COVID-19 ,Myocardial injury ,Troponin elevation ,Coronary angiography ,AHA COVID-19 CVD registry ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background: Elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) levels in patients with COVID-19 has been associated with worse outcomes. Guidelines on best practices of those patients remain uncertain. Methods: We included patients with COVID-19 and cTn above the assay-specific upper limit of normal (ULN) enrolled in the American Heart Association's COVID-19 registry between March 2020–January 2021. Site-level variability in invasive coronary angiography, LVEF assessment, ICU utilization, and inpatient mortality were determined by calculating adjusted median odds ratio (MOR) using hierarchical logistic regression models. Temporal trends were assessed with Cochran-Armitage trend test. Results: Among 32,636 patients, we included 6234 (19.4 %) with cTn above ULN (age 68.7 ± 16.0 years, 56.5 % male, 51.5 % Caucasian), of whom 1365 (21.6 %) had ≥5-fold elevations. Across 55 sites, the median rate of invasive coronary angiography was 0.1 % with adjusted MOR 1.5(1.0,2.3), median LVEF assessment was 25.5 %, MOR 3.0(2.2,3.9), ICU utilization was 41.7 %, MOR 2.2(1.8,2.6), and mortality was 20.9 %, MOR 1.7(1.5,2.0). Over time, we noted a significant increase in invasive coronary angiography (p-trend = 0.001), and LVEF assessment (p-trend
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Increased soluble urokinase plasminogen activator levels modulate monocyte function to promote atherosclerosis
- Author
-
George Hindy, Daniel J. Tyrrell, Alexi Vasbinder, Changli Wei, Feriel Presswalla, Hui Wang, Pennelope Blakely, Ayse Bilge Ozel, Sarah Graham, Grace H. Holton, Joseph Dowsett, Akl C. Fahed, Kingsley-Michael Amadi, Grace K. Erne, Annika Tekmulla, Anis Ismail, Christopher Launius, Nona Sotoodehnia, James S. Pankow, Lise Wegner Thørner, Christian Erikstrup, Ole Birger Pedersen, Karina Banasik, Søren Brunak, Henrik Ullum, Jesper Eugen-Olsen, Sisse Rye Ostrowski, on behalf of the DBDS Consortium, Mary E. Haas, Jonas B. Nielsen, Luca A. Lotta, on behalf of the Regeneron Genetics Center, Gunnar Engström, Olle Melander, Marju Orho-Melander, Lili Zhao, Venkatesh L. Murthy, David J. Pinsky, Cristen J. Willer, Susan R. Heckbert, Jochen Reiser, Daniel R. Goldstein, Karl C. Desch, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
Cardiology ,Medicine - Abstract
People with kidney disease are disproportionately affected by atherosclerosis for unclear reasons. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an immune-derived mediator of kidney disease, levels of which are strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes. We assessed suPAR’s pathogenic involvement in atherosclerosis using epidemiologic, genetic, and experimental approaches. We found serum suPAR levels to be predictive of coronary artery calcification and cardiovascular events in 5,406 participants without known coronary disease. In a genome-wide association meta-analysis including over 25,000 individuals, we identified a missense variant in the plasminogen activator, urokinase receptor (PLAUR) gene (rs4760), confirmed experimentally to lead to higher suPAR levels. Mendelian randomization analysis in the UK Biobank using rs4760 indicated a causal association between genetically predicted suPAR levels and atherosclerotic phenotypes. In an experimental model of atherosclerosis, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin–9 (Pcsk9) transfection in mice overexpressing suPAR (suPARTg) led to substantially increased atherosclerotic plaques with necrotic cores and macrophage infiltration compared with those in WT mice, despite similar cholesterol levels. Prior to induction of atherosclerosis, aortas of suPARTg mice excreted higher levels of CCL2 and had higher monocyte counts compared with WT aortas. Aortic and circulating suPARTg monocytes exhibited a proinflammatory profile and enhanced chemotaxis. These findings characterize suPAR as a pathogenic factor for atherosclerosis acting at least partially through modulation of monocyte function.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Modulation of the Association Between Age and Death by Risk Factor Burden in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
- Author
-
Ashwin Sunderraj, BS, Chloe Cho, Xuan Cai, MS, Shruti Gupta, MD, MPH, Rupal Mehta, MD, MSCI, Tamara Isakova, MD, MMSc, David E. Leaf, MD, MMSc, Anand Srivastava, MD, MPH, STOP-COVID Investigators, Carl P. Walther, Samaya J. Anumudu, Justin Arunthamakun, Kathleen F. Kopecky, Gregory P. Milligan, Peter A. McCullough, Thuy-Duyen Nguyen, Shahzad Shaefi, Megan L. Krajewski, Sidharth Shankar, Ameeka Pannu, Juan D. Valencia, Sushrut S. Waikar, Zoe A. Kibbelaar, Ambarish M. Athavale, Peter Hart, Shristi Upadhyay, Ishaan Vohra, Ajiboye Oyintayo, Adam Green, Jean-Sebastien Rachoin, Christa A. Schorr, Lisa Shea, Daniel L. Edmonston, Christopher L. Mosher, Alexandre M. Shehata, Zaza Cohen, Valerie Allusson, Gabriela Bambrick-Santoyo, Noor ul aain Bhatti, Bijal Mehta, Aquino Williams, Samantha K. Brenner, Patricia Walters, Ronaldo C. Go, Keith M. Rose, Miguel A. Hernán, Amy M. Zhou, Ethan C. Kim, Rebecca Lisk, Lili Chan, Kusum S. Mathews, Steven G. Coca, Deena R. Altman, Aparna Saha, Howard Soh, Huei Hsun Wen, Sonali Bose, Emily A. Leven, Jing G. Wang, Gohar Mosoyan, Girish N. Nadkarni, Pattharawin Pattharanitima, Emily J. Gallagher, Allon N. Friedman, John Guirguis, Rajat Kapoor, Christopher Meshberger, Katherine J. Kelly, Chirag R. Parikh, Brian T. Garibaldi, Celia P. Corona-Villalobos, Yumeng Wen, Steven Menez, Rubab F. Malik, Carmen Elena Cervantes, Samir C. Gautam, Mary C. Mallappallil, Jie Ouyang, Sabu John, Ernie Yap, Yohannes Melaku, Ibrahim Mohamed, Siddhartha Bajracharya, Isha Puri, Mariah Thaxton, Jyotsna Bhattacharya, John Wagner, Leon Boudourakis, H. Bryant Nguyen, Afshin Ahoubim, Leslie F. Thomas, Dheeraj Reddy Sirganagari, Pramod K. Guru, Kianoush Kashani, Shahrzad Tehranian, Yan Zhou, Paul A. Bergl, Jesus Rodriguez, Jatan A. Shah, Mrigank S. Gupta, Princy N. Kumar, Deepa G. Lazarous, Seble G. Kassaye, Michal L. Melamed, Tanya S. Johns, Ryan Mocerino, Kalyan Prudhvi, Denzel Zhu, Rebecca V. Levy, Yorg Azzi, Molly Fisher, Milagros Yunes, Kaltrina Sedaliu, Ladan Golestaneh, Maureen Brogan, Neelja Kumar, Michael Chang, Jyotsana Thakkar, Ritesh Raichoudhury, Akshay Athreya, Mohamed Farag, Edward J. Schenck, Soo Jung Cho, Maria Plataki, Sergio L. Alvarez-Mulett, Luis G. Gomez-Escobar, Di Pan, Stefi Lee, Jamuna Krishnan, William Whalen, David Charytan, Ashley Macina, Sobaata Chaudhry, Benjamin Wu, Frank Modersitzki, Anand Srivastava, Alexander S. Leidner, Carlos Martinez, Jacqueline M. Kruser, Richard G. Wunderink, Alexander J. Hodakowski, Juan Carlos Q. Velez, Eboni G. Price-Haywood, Luis A. Matute-Trochez, Anna E. Hasty, Muner MB. Mohamed, Rupali S. Avasare, David Zonies, David E. Leaf, Shruti Gupta, Meghan E. Sise, Erik T. Newman, Samah Abu Omar, Kapil K. Pokharel, Shreyak Sharma, Harkarandeep Singh, Simon Correa, Tanveer Shaukat, Omer Kamal, Wei Wang, Heather Yang, Jeffery O. Boateng, Meghan Lee, Ian A. Strohbehn, Jiahua Li, Ariel L. Mueller, Roberta E. Redfern, Nicholas S. Cairl, Gabriel Naimy, Abeer Abu-Saif, Danyell Hall, Laura Bickley, Chris Rowan, Farah Madhani-Lovely, Vivian S. Cruz, Kristen M. Hess, Alanna L. Jacobs, Vasil Peev, Jochen Reiser, John J. Byun, Andrew Vissing, Esha M. Kapania, Zoe Post, Nilam P. Patel, Joy-Marie Hermes, Anne K. Sutherland, Amee Patrawalla, Diana G. Finkel, Barbara A. Danek, Sowminya Arikapudi, Jeffrey M. Paer, Peter Cangialosi, Mark Liotta, Jared Radbel, Sonika Puri, Jag Sunderram, Matthew T. Scharf, Ayesha Ahmed, Ilya Berim, Jayanth S. Vatson, Shuchi Anand, Joseph E. Levitt, Pablo Garcia, Suzanne M. Boyle, Rui Song, Jingjing Zhang, Sang Hoon Woo, Xiaoying Deng, Goni Katz-Greenberg, Katharine Senter, Moh’d A. Sharshir, Vadym V. Rusnak, Muhammad Imran Ali, Anip Bansal, Amber S. Podoll, Michel Chonchol, Sunita Sharma, Ellen L. Burnham, David J. Douin, Arash Rashidi, Rana Hejal, Eric Judd, Laura Latta, Ashita Tolwani, Timothy E. Albertson, Jason Y. Adams, Steven Y. Chang, Rebecca M. Beutler, Carl E. Schulze, Etienne Macedo, Harin Rhee, Kathleen D. Liu, Vasantha K. Jotwani, Jay L. Koyner, Chintan V. Shah, Vishal Jaikaransingh, Stephanie M. Toth-Manikowski, Min J. Joo, James P. Lash, Javier A. Neyra, Nourhan Chaaban, Madona Elias, Yahya Ahmad, Alfredo Iardino, Elizabeth H. Au, Jill H. Sharma, Marie Anne Sosa, Sabrina Taldone, Gabriel Contreras, David De La Zerda, Hayley B. Gershengorn, Bhavarth Shukla, Alessia Fornoni, Tanira Ferreira, Salim S. Hayek, Pennelope Blakely, Hanna Berlin, Tariq U. Azam, Husam Shadid, Michael Pan, Patrick O’ Hayer, Chelsea Meloche, Rafey Feroze, Rayan Kaakati, Danny Perry, Abbas Bitar, Elizabeth Anderson, Kishan J. Padalia, John P. Donnelly, Andrew J. Admon, Jennifer E. Flythe, Matthew J. Tugman, Emily H. Chang, Brent R. Brown, Amanda K. Leonberg-Yoo, Ryan C. Spiardi, Todd A. Miano, Meaghan S. Roche, Charles R. Vasquez, Amar D. Bansal, Natalie C. Ernecoff, Sanjana Kapoor, Siddharth Verma, Huiwen Chen, Csaba P. Kovesdy, Miklos Z. Molnar, Ambreen Azhar, S. Susan Hedayati, Mridula V. Nadamuni, Shani Shastri, Duwayne L. Willett, Samuel A.P. Short, Amanda D. Renaghan, Kyle B. Enfield, Pavan K. Bhatraju, A. Bilal Malik, Matthew W. Semler, Anitha Vijayan, Christina Mariyam Joy, Tingting Li, Seth Goldberg, Patricia F. Kao, Greg L. Schumaker, Nitender Goyal, Anthony J. Faugno, Caroline M. Hsu, Asma Tariq, Leah Meyer, Ravi K. Kshirsagar, Daniel E. Weiner, Aju Jose, Marta Christov, Jennifer Griffiths, Sanjeev Gupta, Aromma Kapoor, Perry Wilson, Tanima Arora, and Ugochukwu Ugwuowo
- Subjects
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,RC86-88.9 - Abstract
OBJECTIVES:. Older age is a key risk factor for adverse outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19. However, few studies have investigated whether preexisting comorbidities and acute physiologic ICU factors modify the association between age and death. DESIGN:. Multicenter cohort study. SETTING:. ICUs at 68 hospitals across the United States. PATIENTS:. A total of 5,037 critically ill adults with COVID-19 admitted to ICUs between March 1, 2020, and July 1, 2020. INTERVENTIONS:. None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:. The primary exposure was age, modeled as a continuous variable. The primary outcome was 28-day inhospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression tested the association between age and death. Effect modification by the number of risk factors was assessed through a multiplicative interaction term in the logistic regression model. Among the 5,037 patients included (mean age, 60.9 yr [± 14.7], 3,179 [63.1%] male), 1,786 (35.4%) died within 28 days. Age had a nonlinear association with 28-day mortality (p for nonlinearity
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor and Venous Thromboembolism in COVID‐19
- Author
-
Shengyuan Luo, Alexi Vasbinder, Jeanne M. Du‐Fay‐de‐Lavallaz, Joanne Michelle D. Gomez, Tisha Suboc, Elizabeth Anderson, Annika Tekumulla, Husam Shadid, Hanna Berlin, Michael Pan, Tariq U. Azam, Ibrahim Khaleel, Kishan Padalia, Chelsea Meloche, Patrick O'Hayer, Tonimarie Catalan, Pennelope Blakely, Christopher Launius, Kingsley‐Michael Amadi, Rodica Pop‐Busui, Sven H. Loosen, Athanasios Chalkias, Frank Tacke, Evangelos J. Giamarellos‐Bourboulis, Izzet Altintas, Jesper Eugen‐Olsen, Kim A. Williams, Annabelle Santos Volgman, Jochen Reiser, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
COVID‐19 ,soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor ,thromboembolism ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) contributes significantly to COVID‐19 morbidity and mortality. The urokinase receptor system is involved in the regulation of coagulation. Levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) reflect hyperinflammation and are strongly predictive of outcomes in COVID‐19. Whether suPAR levels identify patients with COVID‐19 at risk for VTE is unclear. Methods and Results We leveraged a multinational observational study of patients hospitalized for COVID‐19 with suPAR and D‐dimer levels measured on admission. In 1960 patients (mean age, 58 years; 57% men; 20% Black race), we assessed the association between suPAR and incident VTE (defined as pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) using logistic regression and Fine‐Gray modeling, accounting for the competing risk of death. VTE occurred in 163 (8%) patients and was associated with higher suPAR and D‐dimer levels. There was a positive association between suPAR and D‐dimer (β=7.34; P=0.002). Adjusted for clinical covariables, including D‐dimer, the odds of VTE were 168% higher comparing the third with first suPAR tertiles (adjusted odds ratio, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.51–4.75]; P
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Impact of cancer and cardiovascular disease on in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19 patients: results from the american heart association COVID-19 cardiovascular disease registry
- Author
-
David M. Tehrani, Xiaoyan Wang, Asim M. Rafique, Salim S. Hayek, Joerg Herrmann, Tomas G. Neilan, Pooja Desai, Alicia Morgans, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Rushi V. Parikh, and Eric H. Yang
- Subjects
COVID-19 ,Cancer ,Malignancy ,Cardiovascular disease ,Mortality ,Severe disease ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background While pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) appears to be associated with poor outcomes in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), data on patients with CVD and concomitant cancer is limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of underlying CVD and CVD risk factors with cancer history on in-hospital mortality in those with COVID-19. Methods Data from symptomatic adults hospitalized with COVID-19 at 86 hospitals in the US enrolled in the American Heart Association’s COVID-19 CVD Registry was analyzed. The primary exposure was cancer history. The primary outcome was in-hospital death. Multivariable logistic regression models were adjusted for demographics, CVD risk factors, and CVD. Interaction between history of cancer with concomitant CVD and CVD risk factors were tested. Results Among 8222 patients, 892 (10.8%) had a history of cancer and 1501 (18.3%) died. Cancer history had significant interaction with CVD risk factors of age, body mass index (BMI), and smoking history, but not underlying CVD itself. History of cancer was significantly associated with increased in-hospital death (among average age and BMI patients, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.07–6.24; p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Application of regularized regression to identify novel predictors of mortality in a cohort of hemodialysis patients
- Author
-
Stanislas Werfel, Georg Lorenz, Bernhard Haller, Roman Günthner, Julia Matschkal, Matthias C. Braunisch, Carolin Schaller, Peter Gundel, Stephan Kemmner, Salim S. Hayek, Christian Nusshag, Jochen Reiser, Philipp Moog, Uwe Heemann, and Christoph Schmaderer
- Subjects
Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Abstract Cohort studies often provide a large array of data on study participants. The techniques of statistical learning can allow an efficient way to analyze large datasets in order to uncover previously unknown, clinically relevant predictors of morbidity or mortality. We applied a combination of elastic net penalized Cox regression and stability selection with the aim of identifying novel predictors of mortality in a cohort of prevalent hemodialysis patients. In our analysis we included 475 patients from the “rISk strAtification in end-stage Renal disease” (ISAR) study, who we split into derivation and confirmation cohorts. A wide array of examinations was available for study participants, resulting in over a hundred potential predictors. In the selection approach many of the well established predictors were retrieved in the derivation cohort. Additionally, the serum levels of IL-12p70 and AST were selected as mortality predictors and confirmed in the withheld subgroup. High IL-12p70 levels were specifically prognostic of infection-related mortality. In summary, we demonstrate an approach how statistical learning can be applied to a cohort study to derive novel hypotheses in a data-driven way. Our results suggest a novel role of IL-12p70 in infection-related mortality, while AST is a promising additional biomarker in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Biomarkers for monitoring and prevention in cancer/heart disease: Traditional and innovative perspectives
- Author
-
Alexi Vasbinder and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Angiotensin‐Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers, and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for COVID‐19
- Author
-
Michael Pan, Alexi Vasbinder, Elizabeth Anderson, Toniemarie Catalan, Husam R. Shadid, Hanna Berlin, Kishan Padalia, Patrick O’Hayer, Chelsea Meloche, Tariq U. Azam, Ibrahim Khaleel, Erinleigh Michaud, Pennelope Blakely, Abbas Bitar, Yiyuan Huang, Lili Zhao, Rodica Pop‐Busui, Sven H. Loosen, Athanasios Chalkias, Frank Tacke, Evangelos J. Giamarellos‐Bourboulis, Jochen Reiser, Jesper Eugen‐Olsen, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
ACE inhibitors ,angiotensin receptor blockers ,COVID‐19 ,mortality ,outcomes ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background Use of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) is thought to affect COVID‐19 through modulating levels of angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2, the cell entry receptor for SARS‐CoV2. We sought to assess the association between ACEi/ARB, biomarkers of inflammation, and outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID‐19. Methods and Results We leveraged the ISIC (International Study of Inflammation in COVID‐19), identified patients admitted for symptomatic COVID‐19 between February 1, 2020 and June 1, 2021 for COVID‐19, and examined the association between in‐hospital ACEi/ARB use and all‐cause death, need for ventilation, and need for dialysis. We estimated the causal effect of ACEi/ARB on the composite outcomes using marginal structural models accounting for serial blood pressure and serum creatinine measures. Of 2044 patients in ISIC, 1686 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 398 (23.6%) patients who were previously on ACEi/ARB received at least 1 dose during their hospitalization for COVID‐19. There were 215 deaths, 407 patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and 124 patients who required dialysis during their hospitalization. Prior ACEi/ARB use was associated with lower levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and C‐reactive protein. In multivariable analysis, in‐hospital ACEi/ARB use was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome of in‐hospital death, mechanical ventilation, or dialysis (adjusted hazard ratio 0.49, 95% CI [0.36–0.65]). Conclusions In patients hospitalized for COVID‐19, ACEi/ARB use was associated with lower levels of inflammation and lower risk of in‐hospital outcomes. Clinical trials will define the role of ACEi/ARB in the treatment of COVID‐19. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04818866.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Machine Learning Prediction of Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019
- Author
-
Matthew M. Churpek, MD, MPH, PhD, Shruti Gupta, MD, MPH, Alexandra B. Spicer, MS, Salim S. Hayek, MD, Anand Srivastava, MD, MPH, Lili Chan, MD, MSCR, Michal L. Melamed, MD, MHS, Samantha K. Brenner, MD, MPH, Jared Radbel, MD, Farah Madhani-Lovely, MD, Pavan K. Bhatraju, MD, MSc, Anip Bansal, MD, Adam Green, MD, MBA, Nitender Goyal, MD, Shahzad Shaefi, MD, MPH, Chirag R. Parikh, MD, PhD, Matthew W. Semler, MD, David E. Leaf, MD, MMSc, Carl P. Walther, Samaya J. Anumudu, Justin Arunthamakun, Kathleen F. Kopecky, Gregory P. Milligan, Peter A. McCullough, ThuyDuyen Nguyen, Shahzad Shaefi, Megan L. Krajewski, Sidharth Shankar, Ameeka Pannu, Juan D. Valencia, Sushrut S. Waikar, Zoe A. Kibbelaar, Ambarish M. Athavale, Peter Hart, Oyintayo Ajiboye, Matthew Itteera, Adam Green, Jean-Sebastien Rachoin, Christa A. Schorr, Lisa Shea, Daniel L. Edmonston, Christopher L. Mosher, Alexandre M. Shehata, Zaza Cohen, Valerie Allusson, Gabriela Bambrick-Santoyo, Noor ul aain Bhatti, Bijal Metha, Aquino Williams, Samantha K. Brenner, Patricia Walters, Ronaldo C. Go, Keith M. Rose, Miguel A. Hernán, Amy M. Zhou, Ethan C. Kim, Rebecca Lisk, Lili Chan, Kusum S. Mathews, Steven G. Coca, Deena R. Altman, Aparna Saha, Howard Soh, Huei Hsun Wen, Sonali Bose, Emily Leven, Jing G. Wang, Gohar Mosoyan, Girish N. Nadkarni, Allon N. Friedman, John Guirguis, Rajat Kapoor, Christopher Meshberger, Chirag R. Parikh, Brian T. Garibaldi, Celia P. Corona-Villalobos, Yumeng Wen, Steven Menez, Rubab F. Malik, Carmen Elena Cervantes, Samir C. Gautam, Crystal Chang, H. Bryant Nguyen, Afshin Ahoubim, Leslie F. Thomas, Pramod K. Guru, Paul A. Bergl, Yan Zhou, Jesus Rodriguez, Jatan A. Shah, Mrigank S. Gupta, Princy N. Kumar, Deepa G. Lazarous, Seble G. Kassaye, Michal L. Melamed, Tanya S. Johns, Ryan Mocerino, Kalyan Prudhvi, Denzel Zhu, Rebecca V. Levy, Yorg Azzi, Molly Fisher, Milagros Yunes, Kaltrina Sedaliu, Ladan Golestaneh, Maureen Brogan, Jyotsana Thakkar, Neelja Kumar, Michael J. Ross, Michael Chang, Ritesh Raichoudhury, Edward J. Schenck, Soo Jung Cho, Maria Plataki, Sergio L. Alvarez-Mulett, Luis G. Gomez-Escobar, Di Pan, Stefi Lee, Jamuna Krishnan, William Whalen, David Charytan, Ashley Macina, Daniel W. Ross, Anand Srivastava, Alexander S. Leidner, Carlos Martinez, Jacqueline M. Kruser, Richard G. Wunderink, Alexander J. Hodakowski, Juan Carlos Q. Velez, Eboni G. Price-Haywood, Luis A. Matute-Trochez, Anna E. Hasty, Muner MB. Mohamed, Rupali S. Avasare, David Zonies, David E. Leaf, Shruti Gupta, Rebecca M. Baron, Meghan E. Sise, Erik T. Newman, Samah Abu Omar, Kapil K. Pokharel, Shreyak Sharma, Harkarandeep Singh, Simon Correa Gaviria, Tanveer Shaukat, Omer Kamal, Wei Wang, Heather Yang, Jeffery O. Boateng, Meghan Lee, Ian A. Strohbehn, Jiahua Li, Saif A. Muhsin, Ernest I. Mandel, Ariel L. Mueller, Nicholas S. Cairl, Farah Madhani-Lovely, Chris Rowan, Farah Madhai-Lovely, Vasil Peev, Jochen Reiser, John J. Byun, Andrew Vissing, Esha M. Kapania, Zoe Post, Nilam P. Patel, Joy-Marie Hermes, Anne K. Sutherland, Amee Patrawalla, Diana G. Finkel, Barbara A. Danek, Sowminya Arikapudi, Jeffrey M. Paer, Jared Radbel, Sonika Puri, Jag Sunderram, Matthew T. Scharf, Ayesha Ahmed, Ilya Berim, Jayanth Vatson, Shuchi Anand, Joseph E. Levitt, Pablo Garcia, Suzanne M. Boyle, Rui Song, Jingjing Zhang, Moh’d A. Sharshir, Vadym V. Rusnak, Anip Bansal, Amber S. Podoll, Michel Chonchol, Sunita Sharma, Ellen L. Burnham, Arash Rashidi, Rana Hejal, Eric Judd, Laura Latta, Ashita Tolwani, Timothy E. Albertson, Jason Y. Adams, Steven Y. Chang, Rebecca M. Beutler, Carl E. Schulze, Etienne Macedo, Harin Rhee, Kathleen D. Liu, Vasantha K. Jotwani, Jay L. Koyner, Chintan V. Shah, Vishal Jaikaransingh, Stephanie M. Toth-Manikowski, Min J. Joo, James P. Lash, Javier A. Neyra, Nourhan Chaaban, Alfredo Iardino, Elizabeth H. Au, Jill H. Sharma, Marie Anne Sosa, Sabrina Taldone, Gabriel Contreras, David De La Zerda, Hayley B. Gershengorn, Salim S. Hayek, Pennelope Blakely, Hanna Berlin, Tariq U. Azam, Husam Shadid, Michael Pan, Patrick O’ Hayer, Chelsea Meloche, Rafey Feroze, Kishan J. Padalia, Jeff Leya, John P. Donnelly, Andrew J. Admon, Jennifer E. Flythe, Matthew J. Tugman, Brent R. Brown, Amanda K. Leonberg-Yoo, Ryan C. Spiardi, Todd A. Miano, Meaghan S. Roche, Charles R. Vasquez, Amar D. Bansal, Natalie C. Ernecoff, Csaba P. Kovesdy, Miklos Z. Molnar, S. Susan Hedayati, Mridula V. Nadamuni, Sadaf S. Khan, Duwayne L. Willett, Samuel A.P. Short, Amanda D. Renaghan, Pavan Bhatraju, A. Bilal Malik, Matthew W. Semler, Anitha Vijayan, Christina Mariyam Joy, Tingting Li, Seth Goldberg, Patricia F. Kao, Greg L. Schumaker, Nitender Goyal, Anthony J. Faugno, Caroline M. Hsu, Asma Tariq, Leah Meyer, Marta Christov, Francis P. Wilson, Tanima Arora, and Ugochukwu Ugwuowo
- Subjects
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,RC86-88.9 - Abstract
OBJECTIVES:. Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 have variable mortality. Risk scores could improve care and be used for prognostic enrichment in trials. We aimed to compare machine learning algorithms and develop a simple tool for predicting 28-day mortality in ICU patients with coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN:. This was an observational study of adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019. The primary outcome was 28-day inhospital mortality. Machine learning models and a simple tool were derived using variables from the first 48 hours of ICU admission and validated externally in independent sites and temporally with more recent admissions. Models were compared with a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, National Early Warning Score, and CURB-65 using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration. SETTING:. Sixty-eight U.S. ICUs. PATIENTS:. Adults with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to 68 ICUs in the United States between March 4, 2020, and June 29, 2020. INTERVENTIONS:. None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:. The study included 5,075 patients, 1,846 (36.4%) of whom died by day 28. eXtreme Gradient Boosting had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in external validation (0.81) and was well-calibrated, while k-nearest neighbors were the lowest performing machine learning algorithm (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.69). Findings were similar with temporal validation. The simple tool, which was created using the most important features from the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model, had a significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in external validation (0.78) than the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0.69), National Early Warning Score (0.60), and CURB-65 (0.65; p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Age, number of ICU beds, creatinine, lactate, arterial pH, and Pao2/Fio2 ratio were the most important predictors in the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model. CONCLUSIONS:. eXtreme Gradient Boosting had the highest discrimination overall, and our simple tool had higher discrimination than a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, National Early Warning Score, and CURB-65 on external validation. These models could be used to improve triage decisions and clinical trial enrichment.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Performance of crisis standards of care guidelines in a cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients in the United States
- Author
-
Julia L. Jezmir, Maheetha Bharadwaj, Alexander Chaitoff, Bradford Diephuis, Conor P. Crowley, Sandeep P. Kishore, Eric Goralnick, Louis T. Merriam, Aimee Milliken, Chanu Rhee, Nicholas Sadovnikoff, Sejal B. Shah, Shruti Gupta, David E. Leaf, William B. Feldman, Edy Y. Kim, Carl P. Walther, Samaya J. Anumudu, Justin Arunthamakun, Kathleen F. Kopecky, Gregory P. Milligan, Peter A. McCullough, Thuy-Duyen Nguyen, Shahzad Shaefi, Megan L. Krajewski, Sidharth Shankar, Ameeka Pannu, Juan D. Valencia, Sushrut S. Waikar, Zoe A. Kibbelaar, Ambarish M. Athavale, Peter Hart, Shristi Upadhyay, Ishaan Vohra, Ajiboye Oyintayo, Adam Green, Jean-Sebastien Rachoin, Christa A. Schorr, Lisa Shea, Daniel L. Edmonston, Christopher L. Mosher, Alexandre M. Shehata, Zaza Cohen, Valerie Allusson, Gabriela Bambrick-Santoyo, Noor ul aain Bhatti, Bijal Mehta, Aquino Williams, Samantha K. Brenner, Patricia Walters, Ronaldo C. Go, Keith M. Rose, Miguel A. Hernán, Amy M. Zhou, Ethan C. Kim, Rebecca Lisk, Lili Chan, Kusum S. Mathews, Steven G. Coca, Deena R. Altman, Aparna Saha, Howard Soh, Huei Hsun Wen, Sonali Bose, Emily A. Leven, Jing G. Wang, Gohar Mosoyan, Girish N. Nadkarni, Pattharawin Pattharanitima, Allon N. Friedman, John Guirguis, Rajat Kapoor, Christopher Meshberger, Katherine J. Kelly, Chirag R. Parikh, Brian T. Garibaldi, Celia P. Corona-Villalobos, Yumeng Wen, Steven Menez, Rubab F. Malik, Elena Cervantes, Samir Gautam, Mary C. Mallappallil, Jie Ouyang, Sabu John, Ernie Yap, Yohannes Melaku, Ibrahim Mohamed, Siddartha Bajracharya, Isha Puri, Mariah Thaxton, Jyotsna Bhattacharya, John Wagner, Leon Boudourakis, H. Bryant Nguyen, Afshin Ahoubim, Leslie F. Thomas, Dheeraj Reddy Sirganagari, Pramod K. Guru, Kianoush Kashani, Yan Zhou, Paul A. Bergl, Jesus Rodriguez, Jatan A. Shah, Mrigank S. Gupta, Princy N. Kumar, Deepa G. Lazarous, Seble G. Kassaye, Michal L. Melamed, Tanya S. Johns, Ryan Mocerino, Kalyan Prudhvi, Denzel Zhu, Rebecca V. Levy, Yorg Azzi, Molly Fisher, Milagros Yunes, Kaltrina Sedaliu, Ladan Golestaneh, Maureen Brogan, Neelja Kumar, Michael Chang, Ritesh Raichoudhury, Akshay Athreya, Mohamed Farag, Edward J. Schenck, Soo Jung Cho, Maria Plataki, Sergio L. Alvarez-Mulett, Luis G. Gomez-Escobar, Di Pan, Stefi Lee, Jamuna Krishnan, William Whalen, David Charytan, Ashley Macina, Sobaata Chaudhry, Benjamin Wu, Frank Modersitzki, Anand Srivastava, Alexander S. Leidner, Carlos Martinez, Jacqueline M. Kruser, Richard G. Wunderink, Alexander J. Hodakowski, Juan Carlos Q. Velez, Eboni G. Price-Haywood, Luis A. Matute-Trochez, Anna E. Hasty, Muner MB. Mohamed, Rupali S. Avasare, David Zonies, Meghan E. Sise, Erik T. Newman, Samah Abu Omar, Kapil K. Pokharel, Shreyak Sharma, Harkarandeep Singh, Simon Correa, Tanveer Shaukat, Omer Kamal, Wei Wang, Heather Yang, Jeffery O. Boateng, Meghan Lee, Ian A. Strohbehn, Jiahua Li, Ariel L. Mueller, Roberta Redfern, Nicholas S. Cairl, Gabriel Naimy, Abeer Abu-Saif, Danyell Hall, Laura Bickley, Chris Rowan, Farah Madhani-Lovely, Vivian S. Cruz, Kristen M. Hess, Alanna L. Jacobs, Vasil Peev, Jochen Reiser, John J. Byun, Andrew Vissing, Esha M. Kapania, Zoe Post, Nilam P. Patel, Joy-Marie Hermes, Anne K. Sutherland, Amee Patrawalla, Diana G. Finkel, Barbara A. Danek, Sowminya Arikapudi, Jeffrey M. Paer, Peter Cangialosi, Mark Liotta, Jared Radbel, Sonika Puri, Jag Sunderram, Matthew T. Scharf, Ayesha Ahmed, Ilya Berim, Jayanth S. Vatson, Shuchi Anand, Joseph E. Levitt, Suzanne M. Boyle, Rui Song, Jingjing Zhang, Sang Hoon Woo, Xiaoying Deng, Goni Katz-Greenberg, Katharine Senter, Moh’d A. Sharshir, Vadym V. Rusnak, Muhammad Imran Ali, Anip Bansal, Amber S. Podoll, Michel Chonchol, Sunita Sharma, Ellen L. Burnham, Arash Rashidi, Rana Hejal, Eric Judd, Laura Latta, Ashita Tolwani, Timothy E. Albertson, Jason Y. Adams, Steven Y. Chang, Rebecca M. Beutler, Etienne Macedo, Harin Rhee, Kathleen D. Liu, Vasantha K. Jotwani, Jay L. Koyner, Chintan V. Shah, Vishal Jaikaransingh, Stephanie M. Toth-Manikowski, Min J. Joo, James P. Lash, Javier A. Neyra, Nourhan Chaaban, Madona Elias, Yahya Ahmad, Alfredo Iardino, Elizabeth H. Au, Jill H. Sharma, Marie Anne Sosa, Sabrina Taldone, Gabriel Contreras, David De La Zerda, Hayley B. Gershengorn, Bhavarth Shukla, Alessia Fornoni, Tanira Ferreira, Salim S. Hayek, Pennelope Blakely, Hanna Berlin, Tariq U. Azam, Husam Shadid, Michael Pan, Patrick O’ Hayer, Chelsea Meloche, Rafey Feroze, Rayan Kaakati, Danny Perry, Abbas Bitar, Elizabeth Anderson, Kishan J. Padalia, John P. Donnelly, Andrew J. Admon, Jennifer E. Flythe, Matthew J. Tugman, Emily H. Chang, Brent R. Brown, Amanda K. Leonberg-Yoo, Ryan C. Spiardi, Todd A. Miano, Meaghan S. Roche, Charles R. Vasquez, Amar D. Bansal, Natalie C. Ernecoff, Sanjana Kapoor, Siddharth Verma, Csaba P. Kovesdy, Miklos Z. Molnar, Ambreen Azhar, S. Susan Hedayati, Mridula V. Nadamuni, Shani Shastri, Duwayne L. Willett, Samuel A.P. Short, Amanda D. Renaghan, Kyle B. Enfield, Pavan K. Bhatraju, A. Bilal Malik, Matthew W. Semler, Anitha Vijayan, Christina Mariyam Joy, Tingting Li, Seth Goldberg, Patricia F. Kao, Greg L. Schumaker, Nitender Goyal, Anthony J. Faugno, Caroline M. Hsu, Asma Tariq, Leah Meyer, Ravi K. Kshirsagar, Daniel E. Weiner, Aju Jose, Marta Christov, Jennifer Griffiths, Sanjeev Gupta, Aromma Kapoor, Perry Wilson, Tanima Arora, and Ugochukwu Ugwuowo
- Subjects
medical ethics ,crisis standards of care ,triage ,critical care ,intensive care ,COVID-19 ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Summary: Many US states published crisis standards of care (CSC) guidelines for allocating scarce critical care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the performance of these guidelines in maximizing their population benefit has not been well tested. In 2,272 adults with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation drawn from the Study of the Treatment and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (STOP-COVID) multicenter cohort, we test the following three approaches to CSC algorithms: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores grouped into ranges, SOFA score ranges plus comorbidities, and a hypothetical approach using raw SOFA scores not grouped into ranges. We find that area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for all three algorithms demonstrate only modest discrimination for 28-day mortality. Adding comorbidity scoring modestly improves algorithm performance over SOFA scores alone. The algorithm incorporating comorbidities has modestly worse predictive performance for Black compared to white patients. CSC algorithms should be empirically examined to refine approaches to the allocation of scarce resources during pandemics and to avoid potential exacerbation of racial inequities.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of In‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest in COVID‐19 Patients Admitted to Intensive and Non‐Intensive Care Units: Insights From the AHA COVID‐19 CVD Registry
- Author
-
Prakash Acharya, Sagar Ranka, Prince Sethi, Rajani Bharati, Jinxiang Hu, Amit Noheria, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Salim S. Hayek, and Kamal Gupta
- Subjects
cardiac arrest ,COVID‐19 ,outcomes ,predictors ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background Limited information is available regarding in‐hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in patients with COVID‐19. Methods and Results We leveraged the American Heart Association COVID‐19 Cardiovascular Disease (AHA COVID‐19 CVD) Registry to conduct a cohort study of adults hospitalized for COVID‐19. IHCA was defined as those with documentation of cardiac arrest requiring medication or electrical shock for resuscitation. Mixed effects models with random intercepts were used to identify independent predictors of IHCA and mortality while accounting for clustering at the hospital level. The study cohort included 8518 patients (6080 not in the intensive care unit [ICU]) with mean age of 61.5 years (SD 17.5). IHCA occurred in 509 (5.9%) patients overall with 375 (73.7%) in the ICU and 134 (26.3%) patients not in the ICU. The majority of patients at the time of ICHA were not in a shockable rhythm (76.5%). Independent predictors of IHCA included older age, Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; CI, 1.4–2.4; P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Upfront dexrazoxane for the reduction of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in adults with preexisting cardiomyopathy and cancer: a consecutive case series
- Author
-
Sarju Ganatra, Anju Nohria, Sachin Shah, John D. Groarke, Ajay Sharma, David Venesy, Richard Patten, Krishna Gunturu, Corrine Zarwan, Tomas G. Neilan, Ana Barac, Salim S. Hayek, Sourbha Dani, Shantanu Solanki, Syed Saad Mahmood, and Steven E. Lipshultz
- Subjects
Anthracycline ,Cardiotoxicity ,Dexrazoxane ,Cardiomyopathy ,Cardioprotection ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background Cardiotoxicity associated with anthracycline-based chemotherapies has limited their use in patients with preexisting cardiomyopathy or heart failure. Dexrazoxane protects against the cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines, but in the USA and some European countries, its use had been restricted to adults with advanced breast cancer receiving a cumulative doxorubicin (an anthracycline) dose > 300 mg/m2. We evaluated the off-label use of dexrazoxane as a cardioprotectant in adult patients with preexisting cardiomyopathy, undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy. Methods Between July 2015 and June 2017, five consecutive patients, with preexisting, asymptomatic, systolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction who required anthracycline-based chemotherapy, were concomitantly treated with off-label dexrazoxane, administered 30 min before each anthracycline dose, regardless of cancer type or stage. Demographic, cardiovascular, and cancer-related outcomes were compared to those of three consecutive patients with asymptomatic cardiomyopathy treated earlier at the same hospital without dexrazoxane. Results Mean age of the five dexrazoxane-treated patients and three patients treated without dexrazoxane was 70.6 and 72.6 years, respectively. All five dexrazoxane-treated patients successfully completed their planned chemotherapy (doxorubicin, 280 to 300 mg/m2). With dexrazoxane therapy, changes in LV systolic function were minimal with mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreasing from 39% at baseline to 34% after chemotherapy. None of the dexrazoxane-treated patients experienced symptomatic heart failure or elevated biomarkers (cardiac troponin I or brain natriuretic peptide). Of the three patients treated without dexrazoxane, two received doxorubicin (mean dose, 210 mg/m2), and one received daunorubicin (540 mg/m2). Anthracycline therapy resulted in a marked reduction in LVEF from 42.5% at baseline to 18%. All three developed symptomatic heart failure requiring hospitalization and intravenous diuretic therapy. Two of them died from cardiogenic shock and multi-organ failure. Conclusion The concomitant administration of dexrazoxane in patients with preexisting cardiomyopathy permitted successful delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy without cardiac decompensation. Larger prospective trials are warranted to examine the use of dexrazoxane as a cardioprotectant in patients with preexisting cardiomyopathy who require anthracyclines.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Ethnic differences in subclinical vascular function in South Asians, Whites, and African Americans in the United States
- Author
-
Unjali P. Gujral, Anurag Mehta, Salman Sher, Irina Uphoff, Saket Kumar, Salim S. Hayek, Yi-An Ko, Greg S. Martin, Gary H. Gibbons, and Arshed A. Quyyumi
- Subjects
Cardiovascular disease ,Arterial stiffness ,Augmentation index ,Pulse wave velocity ,Ethnicity ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background: South Asians are a high-risk ethnic group for cardiovascular disease despite having lower levels of conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as obesity and smoking. Ethnic differences in pulse wave reflections, arterial stiffness, and subclinical atherosclerosis as measured using augmentation index (AIX), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) may reflect some of this excess risk. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of pooled data from three community-based sources in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Data on 530 South Asians collected from local health fairs was compared with data on 507 White and 192 African Americans from the Emory Predictive Health Initiative and 351 White and 382 African Americans from the Morehouse and Emory Team up to Eliminate Health Disparities Study. Results: Linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking, MAP, fasting glucose, TC, HDL-C, creatinine, and body mass index were used to assess the relationship between ethnicity and vascular function measures. In fully adjusted models, South Asians had higher heart rate corrected AIX as compared with Whites and African Americans (by 5.47%, p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Elevated suPAR Is an Independent Risk Marker for Incident Kidney Disease in Acute Medical Patients
- Author
-
Esben Iversen, Morten Baltzer Houlind, Thomas Kallemose, Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen, Mads Hornum, Bo Feldt-Rasmussen, Salim S. Hayek, Ove Andersen, and Jesper Eugen-Olsen
- Subjects
chronic kidney disease ,acute kidney injury ,dialysis ,soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor ,glomerular filtration rate ,emergency department ,Biology (General) ,QH301-705.5 - Abstract
IntroductionIdentifying patients at high risk of developing kidney disease could lead to early clinical interventions that prevent or slow disease progression. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an inflammatory biomarker thought to be involved in the pathogenesis and development of kidney disease. We aimed to determine whether elevated plasma suPAR measured at hospital admission is associated with incident kidney disease in patients presenting to the emergency department.Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective registry-based cohort study performed at the Emergency Department of Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark. Patients were included in the study from November 2013 to March 2017 and followed until June 2017. Patients were excluded if they were diagnosed with kidney disease or died prior to index discharge. Plasma suPAR was measured at hospital admission, and the main outcome was time to incident kidney disease, defined by ICD-10 diagnosis codes for both chronic and acute kidney conditions. Association between suPAR and time to incident kidney disease was assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.ResultsIn total, 25,497 patients (median age 58.1 years; 52.5% female) were admitted to the emergency department and followed for development of kidney disease. In multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, eGFR, CRP, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes, each doubling in suPAR at hospital admission was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.57 (95% CI: 1.38–1.78, P < 0.001) for developing a chronic kidney condition and 2.51 (95% CI: 2.09–3.01, P < 0.001) for developing an acute kidney condition.DiscussionIn a large cohort of acutely hospitalized medical patients, elevated suPAR was independently associated with incident chronic and acute kidney conditions. This highlights the potential for using suPAR in risk classification models to identify high-risk patients who could benefit from early clinical interventions. The main limitation of this study is its reliance on accurate reporting of ICD-10 codes for kidney disease.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Sex Differences in Circulating Soluble Urokinase‐Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Levels and Adverse Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease
- Author
-
Anurag Mehta, Shivang R. Desai, Yi‐An Ko, Chang Liu, Devinder S. Dhindsa, Aditi Nayak, Ananya Hooda, Mohamed A. Martini, Kiran Ejaz, Laurence S. Sperling, Jochen Reiser, Salim S. Hayek, and Arshed A. Quyyumi
- Subjects
biomarkers ,coronary artery disease ,outcomes ,sex differences ,SuPAR ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background Women have higher circulating levels of soluble urokinase‐type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), and elevated suPAR is associated with cardiovascular risk. The independent association of sex with suPAR and the impact of sex on its association with cardiovascular risk are unknown. Methods and Results Plasma suPAR was measured using ELISA in 2 cohorts of 666 asymptomatic individuals (49 years, 65% women) and 4184 patients with coronary artery disease (63 years, 37% women). Independent association of sex with suPAR was studied using linear regression models adjusted for demographics, risk factors, and visceral adiposity in asymptomatic participants. Impact of sex on association of suPAR with all‐cause mortality was studied in patients with coronary artery disease using multivariable‐adjusted Cox models. Sex‐specific suPAR cutoffs for predicting all‐cause mortality were calculated. Asymptomatic women had 10% higher suPAR compared with men after adjusting for confounders, and visceral adiposity partly accounted for this association. Over a median follow‐up of 5.2 years, 795 deaths were recorded in patients with coronary artery disease. Log2‐transformed suPAR was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio per 1‐SD 1.72, 95% CI 1.60–1.85) and an interaction with sex was noted (P=0.005). Association of suPAR with mortality was slightly weaker in women (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.41–1.83) compared with men (hazard ratio 1.83, 95% CI 1.67–2.00). However, using sex‐specific suPAR cut‐offs (4392 pg/mL for women and 3187 pg/mL for men), a similar mortality incidence was observed for both sexes (38.5% and 35.5%, respectively, P=0.3). Conclusions Women have 10% higher plasma suPAR levels compared with men. Elevated sex‐specific plasma suPAR levels are equally predictive of risk of adverse events in both sexes.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Mean Aortic pressure gradient and global longitudinal strain recovery after transcatheter aortic valve replacement – A retrospective analysis
- Author
-
Frank E. Corrigan, Xiao Zhou, John C. Lisko, Salim S. Hayek, Ioannis Parastatidis, Patricia Keegan, Sharon Howell, Vinod Thourani, Vasilis C. Babaliaros, and Stamatios Lerakis
- Subjects
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) has incremental value in assessing left ventricular (LV) function in severe aortic stenosis and is related to clinical outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to identify relevant echocardiographic predictors of GLS improvement and myocardial function recovery after TAVR. Methods: We analyzed baseline and 12-month follow-up echocardiograms for LV strain analysis from 123 patients who underwent at Emory University Hospital with the Edwards SAPIEN valve between 7/2007 and 7/2013. Results: At baseline, 61 had reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% (rEF), and 80 had preserved LVEF >50% (pEF). Higher baseline mean pressure gradient (MPG) and aortic peak velocity (AV Vmax) predicted myocardial function recovery defined as ≥20% improvement in global longitudinal strain (r = 0.29, p
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Oxidative stress predicts cognitive decline with aging in healthy adults: an observational study
- Author
-
Ihab Hajjar, Salim S. Hayek, Felicia C. Goldstein, Greg Martin, Dean P. Jones, and Arshed Quyyumi
- Subjects
Aging ,Cognition ,Oxidation ,Inflammation ,Glutathione ,Cysteine ,Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system ,RC346-429 - Abstract
Abstract Background Redox signaling, which can be assessed by circulating aminothiols, reflects oxidative stress (OS) status and has been linked to clinical cardiovascular disease and its risk factors. These, in turn, are related to executive function decline. OS may precede the pro-inflammatory state seen in vascular disease. The objective of this study is to investigate the association between aminothiol markers of OS and inflammation in cognitive decline, especially in the executive cognitive domain which is highly susceptible to cardiovascular risk factors and is an important predictor of cognitive disability. Methods The study design is that of a longitudinal cohort study within the setting of a large academic institution with participants being university employees (n = 511), mean age 49 years, 68% women, and 23% African-American. These participants were followed for four consecutive years with a yearly cognitive assessment conducted using computerized versions of 15 cognitive tests. Peripheral cystine, glutathione, their disulfide derivatives, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured. Results Lower levels of glutathione at baseline was associated with a decline in the executive domain over 4 years (covariate-adjusted relative risk (RR) for glutathione = 1.70 (95% CI = 1.02–2.85), p = 0.04). Furthermore, a longitudinal decline in glutathione level was associated with a faster decline in the executive domain (p = 0.03). None of the other OS markers or CRP were linked to cognitive decline over 4 years. Conclusion Increased OS reflected by decreased glutathione was associated with a decline in executive function in a healthy population. In contrast, inflammation was not linked to cognitive decline. OS may be an earlier biomarker that precedes the inflammatory phase of executive decline with aging.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Cardiovascular Disease Biomarkers and suPAR in Predicting Decline in Renal Function: A Prospective Cohort Study
- Author
-
Salim S. Hayek, Yi-An Ko, Mosaab Awad, Hina Ahmed, Brandon Gray, Kareem Mohammed Hosny, Hiroshi Aida, Melissa J. Tracy, Changli Wei, Sanja Sever, Jochen Reiser, and Arshed A. Quyyumi
- Subjects
CKD ,creatinine ,CRP ,eGFR ,FDP ,HSP-70 ,proteinuria ,troponin ,urokinase ,Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology ,RC870-923 - Abstract
Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) strongly predicts outcomes and incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Whether the association between suPAR and CKD is a reflection of its overall association with chronic inflammation and poor CVD outcomes is unclear. We examined whether CVD biomarkers, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), fibrin-degradation products (FDPs), heat-shock protein 70 (HSP-70), and high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) were associated with a decline in kidney function in the Emory Cardiovascular Biobank cohort, in which suPAR levels were shown to be predictive of both incident CKD and CVD outcomes. Methods: We measured suPAR, hs-CRP, HSP-70, FDP, and hs-TnI plasma levels in 3282 adults (mean age 63 years, 64% male, 75% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using Chronic Kidney Disease–Epidemiology Collaboration (eGFR) at enrollment (n = 3282) and follow-up (n = 2672; median 3.5 years). Urine protein by dipstick at baseline was available for 1335 subjects. Results: There was a weak correlation among biomarkers (r range: 0.17−0.28). hs-CRP, FDPs, hs-TnI, and suPAR were independently associated with baseline eGFR and proteinuria. The median yearly decline in eGFR was −0.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2. hs-CRP (β: −0.04; P = 0.46), FDPs (β: −0.13; P = 0.08), HSP-70 (β: 0.05; P = 0.84), or hs-TnI (β: −0.01; P = 0.76) were associated with eGFR decline. suPAR remained predictive of eGFR decline even after adjusting for all biomarkers. Discussion: hs-CRP, FDP, HSP-70, and hs-TnI were not associated with eGFR decline. The specific association of suPAR with eGFR decline supported its involvement in pathways specific to the pathogenesis of kidney disease.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Low Educational Attainment is a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
- Author
-
Heval M. Kelli, Anurag Mehta, Ayman S. Tahhan, Chang Liu, Jeong Hwan Kim, Tiffany A. Dong, Devinder S. Dhindsa, Bahjat Ghazzal, Muaaz K. Choudhary, Pratik B. Sandesara, Salim S. Hayek, Matthew L. Topel, Ayman A. Alkhoder, Mohamed A. Martini, Arianna Sidoti, Yi‐An Ko, Tene T. Lewis, Viola Vaccarino, Laurence S. Sperling, and Arshed A. Quyyumi
- Subjects
cardiovascular outcomes ,education ,risk assessment ,secondary prevention ,socioeconomic position ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background Educational attainment is an indicator of socioeconomic status and is inversely associated with coronary artery disease risk. Whether educational attainment level (EAL) among patients with coronary artery disease influences outcomes remains understudied. Methods and Results Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization had their highest EAL assessed using options of elementary/middle school, high school, college, or graduate education. Primary outcome was all‐cause mortality and secondary outcomes were a composite of cardiovascular death/non‐fatal myocardial infarction and non‐fatal myocardial infarction during follow‐up. Cox models adjusted for clinically relevant confounders were used to analyze the association of EAL with outcomes. Among 6318 patients (63.5 years, 63% men, 23% black) enrolled, 16%, 42%, 38%, and 4% had received graduate or higher, college, high school, and elementary/middle school education, respectively. During 4.2 median years of follow‐up, there were 1066 all‐cause deaths, 812 cardiovascular deaths/non‐fatal myocardial infarction, and 276 non‐fatal myocardial infarction. Compared with patients with graduate education, those in lower EAL categories (elementary/middle school, high school, or college education) had a higher risk of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratios 1.52 [95% CI 1.11–2.09]; 1.43 [95% CI 1.17–1.73]; and 95% CI 1.26 [1.03–1.53], respectively). Similar findings were observed for secondary outcomes. Conclusions Low educational attainment is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing angiographic coronary artery disease evaluation. The utility of incorporating EAL into risk assessment algorithms and the causal link between low EAL and adverse outcomes in this high‐risk patient population need further investigation.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Flow cytometric data analysis of circulating progenitor cell stability
- Author
-
Ernestine A. Mahar, Liping Mou, Salim S. Hayek, Arshed A. Quyyumi, and Edmund K. Waller
- Subjects
Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ,R858-859.7 ,Science (General) ,Q1-390 - Abstract
A recent publication by Mekonnen et al. demonstrated that among women with non-obstructive coronary artery disease, higher levels of circulating progenitor cells in the blood (CPC), were associated with impaired coronary flow reserve [1]. We performed a quality control assessment of the stability of circulating blood progenitor cells in blood samples stored at 4 °C, to determine the time period during which blood samples can be analyzed and yield consistent data for progenitor cell content. Healthy volunteers (n=6) were recruited and underwent phlebotomy, and blood was stored in EDTA tubes at 4 °C. Flow cytometry was performed to quantitate progenitor cell subsets at 0–4 h, 24 h, and 48 h post phlebotomy. All processed samples were fixed with 1% Paraformaldehyde and 1,000,000 total data events were collected. We found no significant differences in PC data for both CD34+ (P=0.68 for one-way ANOVA) and CD34+/CD133+ (P=0.74 for one-way ANOVA).
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Predicting Mortality in African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor, Coronary Artery Calcium, and High‐Sensitivity C‐Reactive Protein
- Author
-
Salim S. Hayek, Jasmin Divers, Mohamad Raad, Jianzhao Xu, Donald W. Bowden, Melissa Tracy, Jochen Reiser, and Barry I. Freedman
- Subjects
biomarker ,calcium score ,soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor ,urokinase ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
BackgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, outcomes in individual patients vary. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a bone marrow–derived signaling molecule associated with adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes in many populations. We characterized the determinants of suPAR in African Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus and assessed whether levels were useful for predicting mortality beyond clinical characteristics, coronary artery calcium (CAC), and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP). Methods and ResultsWe measured plasma suPAR levels in 500 African Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus enrolled in the African American‐Diabetes Heart Study. We used Kaplan‐Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for clinical characteristics, CAC, and hs‐CRP to examine the association between suPAR and all‐cause mortality. Last, we report the change in C‐statistics comparing the additive values of suPAR, hs‐CRP, and CAC to clinical models for prediction of mortality. The suPAR levels were independently associated with female sex, smoking, insulin use, decreased kidney function, albuminuria, and CAC. After a median 6.8‐year follow‐up, a total of 68 deaths (13.6%) were recorded. In a model incorporating suPAR, CAC, and hs‐CRP, only suPAR was significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.63‐4.34). Addition of suPAR to a baseline clinical model significantly improved the C‐statistic for all‐cause death (Δ0.05, 95% confidence interval 0.01‐0.10), whereas addition of CAC or hs‐CRP did not. ConclusionsIn African Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus, suPAR was strongly associated with mortality and improved risk discrimination metrics beyond traditional risk factors, CAC and hs‐CRP. Studies addressing the clinical usefulness of measuring suPAR concentrations are warranted.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. High‐Sensitivity Troponin I Levels and Coronary Artery Disease Severity, Progression, and Long‐Term Outcomes
- Author
-
Ayman Samman Tahhan, Pratik Sandesara, Salim S. Hayek, Muhammad Hammadah, Ayman Alkhoder, Heval M. Kelli, Matthew Topel, Wesley T. O'Neal, Nima Ghasemzadeh, Yi‐An Ko, Mohamad Mazen Gafeer, Naser Abdelhadi, Fahad Choudhary, Keyur Patel, Agim Beshiri, Gillian Murtagh, Jonathan Kim, Peter Wilson, Leslee Shaw, Viola Vaccarino, Stephen E. Epstein, Laurence Sperling, and Arshed A. Quyyumi
- Subjects
atherosclerosis ,coronary angiography ,coronary artery disease ,troponin ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
BackgroundThe associations between high‐sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) levels and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity and progression remain unclear. We investigated whether there is an association between hsTnI and angiographic severity and progression of CAD and whether the predictive value of hsTnI level for incident cardiovascular outcomes is independent of CAD severity. Methods and ResultsIn 3087 patients (aged 63±12 years, 64% men) undergoing cardiac catheterization without evidence of acute myocardial infarction, the severity of CAD was calculated by the number of major coronary arteries with ≥50% stenosis and the Gensini score. CAD progression was assessed in a subset of 717 patients who had undergone ≥2 coronary angiograms >3 months before enrollment. Patients were followed up for incident all‐cause mortality and incident cardiovascular events. Of the total population, 11% had normal angiograms, 23% had nonobstructive CAD, 20% had 1‐vessel CAD, 20% had 2‐vessel CAD, and 26% had 3‐vessel CAD. After adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus history, and renal function, hsTnI levels were independently associated with the severity of CAD measured by the Gensini score (log 2 ß=0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.18–0.44; P
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Marital Status and Outcomes in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
- Author
-
William M. Schultz, Salim S. Hayek, Ayman Samman Tahhan, Yi‐An Ko, Pratik Sandesara, Mosaab Awad, Kareem H. Mohammed, Keyur Patel, Michael Yuan, Shuai Zheng, Matthew L. Topel, Joy Hartsfield, Ravila Bhimani, Tina Varghese, Jonathan H. Kim, Leslee Shaw, Peter Wilson, Viola Vaccarino, and Arshed A. Quyyumi
- Subjects
cardiovascular disease ,divorce ,marital status ,mortality ,never married ,socioeconomic position ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
BackgroundBeing unmarried is associated with decreased survival in the general population. Whether married, divorced, separated, widowed, or never‐married status affects outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease has not been well characterized. Methods and ResultsA prospective cohort (inception period 2003–2015) of 6051 patients (mean age 63 years, 64% male, 23% black) undergoing cardiac catheterization for suspected or confirmed coronary artery disease was followed for a median of 3.7 years (interquartile range: 1.7–6.7 years). Marital status was stratified as married (n=4088) versus unmarried (n=1963), which included those who were never married (n=451), divorced or separated (n=842), or widowed (n=670). The relationship between marital status and primary outcome of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction was examined using Cox regression models adjusted for clinical characteristics. There were 1085 (18%) deaths from all causes, 688 (11%) cardiovascular‐related deaths, and 272 (4.5%) incident myocardial infarction events. Compared with married participants, being unmarried was associated with higher risk of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–1.47), cardiovascular death (HR: 1.45; 95% CI, 1.18–1.78), and cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (HR: 1.52; 95% CI, 1.27–1.83). Compared with married participants, the increase in cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction was similar for the participants who were divorced or separated (HR: 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10–1.81), widowed (HR: 1.71; 95% CI, 1.32–2.20), or never married (HR: 1.40; 95% CI, 0.97–2.03). The findings persisted after adjustment for medications and other socioeconomic factors. ConclusionsMarital status is independently associated with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease, with higher mortality in the unmarried population. The mechanisms responsible for this increased risk require further study.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Sex Differences in Circulating Progenitor Cells
- Author
-
Matthew L. Topel, Salim S. Hayek, Yi‐An Ko, Pratik B. Sandesara, Ayman Samman Tahhan, Iraj Hesaroieh, Ernestine Mahar, Greg S. Martin, Edmund K. Waller, and Arshed A. Quyyumi
- Subjects
CD133 ,CD34 ,CXCR4 ,estrogen ,progenitor cell ,vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
BackgroundLower levels of circulating progenitor cells (PCs) reflect impaired endogenous regenerative capacity and are associated with aging, vascular disease, and poor outcomes. Whether biologic sex and sex hormones influence PC numbers remains a subject of controversy. We sought to determine sex differences in circulating PCs in both healthy persons and patients with coronary artery disease, and to determine their association with sex hormone levels. Methods and ResultsIn 642 participants (mean age 48 years, 69% women, 23% black) free from cardiovascular disease, we measured circulating PC counts as CD45med+ mononuclear cells coexpressing CD34 and its subsets expressing CD133, chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) receptor 4, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 epitopes using flow cytometry. Testosterone and estradiol levels were measured. After adjustment for age, cardiovascular risk factors, and body mass, CD34+ (β=−23%, P
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Biomarker Trends, Incidence, and Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Induced Myocarditis
- Author
-
Alexi Vasbinder, YeeAnn Chen, Adrien Procureur, Allison Gradone, Tariq U. Azam, Daniel Perry, Husam Shadid, Elizabeth Anderson, Tonimarie Catalan, Pennelope Blakely, Namratha Nelapudi, Mohamad Fardous, Marie C. Bretagne, Sarah K. Adie, Kristen T. Pogue, Monika Leja, Sarah Yentz, Bryan Schneider, Leslie A. Fecher, Christopher D. Lao, Joe-Elie Salem, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
Oncology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine - Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against omicron (B.1.1.529) variant infection and hospitalisation in patients taking immunosuppressive medications: a retrospective cohort study
- Author
-
Malcolm, Risk, Salim S, Hayek, Elena, Schiopu, Liyang, Yuan, Chen, Shen, Xu, Shi, Gary, Freed, and Lili, Zhao
- Subjects
Rheumatology ,Immunology ,Immunology and Allergy - Abstract
There is a scarcity of research regarding the effectiveness of the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccines in patients taking immunosuppressant medications, and no data are published to date pertaining to their effectiveness against omicron (B.1.1.529) variant SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation. We aimed to assess the relationship between immunosuppressive medications, mRNA vaccination, omicron infection, and severe COVID-19 outcomes (ie, hospitalisation, ICU admission, death).We did a retrospective cohort study and included vaccinated and unvaccinated people aged 18 years or older in the Michigan Medicine health-care system, USA, during the omicron-dominant period of the pandemic (Dec 16, 2021-March 4, 2022). We collected data from electronic health records (demographics, diagnoses, medications) combined with immunisation data from the Michigan State Registry to determine vaccination status, and we collected COVID-19-related hospitalisation data by chart review. We used a Cox proportional hazards model based on calendar time to assess the effectiveness of the mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines in people taking immunosuppressive medications (conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs], biologic DMARDs, or glucocorticoids within the past 3 months), while controlling for participant characteristics. Using the same model, we assessed the effect of different classes of medication such as immunosuppressive DMARDs, immunomodulatory DMARDs, and glucocorticoids on SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation due to COVID-19. All analyses were done using complete cases after removing participants with missing covariates.209 492 people were identified in Michigan Medicine, including 165 913 who were vaccinated and 43 579 who were unvaccinated. 41 078 people were excluded because they were younger than 18 years, partially vaccinated, had received a vaccine other than the two vaccines studied, or had incomplete covariate data. 168 414 people were included in the analysis; 97 935 (58%) were women, 70 479 (42%) were men, and 129 816 (77%) were White. 5609 (3%) people were taking immunosuppressive medications. In patients receiving immunosuppressants, three doses of BNT162b2 had a vaccine effectiveness of 50% (95% CI 31-64; p0·0001) and three doses of mRNA-1273 had a vaccine effectiveness of 60% (42-73; p0·0001) against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Three doses of either vaccine had an effectiveness of 87% (95% CI 73-93; p0·0001) against hospitalisation due to COVID-19. Receipt of immunosuppressive DMARDs (hazard ratio 2·32, 95% CI 1·23-4·38; p=0·0097) or glucocorticoids (2·93, 1·77-4·86; p0·0001) and a history of organ or bone marrow transplantation (3·52, 2·01-6·16; p0·0001) were associated with increased risk of hospitalisation due to COVID-19 compared with those who had not received immunosuppressive medications or transplant.People taking immunosuppressive DMARDs or glucocorticoids are at substantially higher risk of hospitalisation due to COVID-19 than the general population. However, the mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines remain effective within this group, and it is important that patients taking these medications remain up to date with vaccinations to mitigate their risk.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
- Author
-
Paul A. Heidenreich, Biykem Bozkurt, David Aguilar, Larry A. Allen, Joni J. Byun, Monica M. Colvin, Anita Deswal, Mark H. Drazner, Shannon M. Dunlay, Linda R. Evers, James C. Fang, Savitri E. Fedson, Gregg C. Fonarow, Salim S. Hayek, Adrian F. Hernandez, Prateeti Khazanie, Michelle M. Kittleson, Christopher S. Lee, Mark S. Link, Carmelo A. Milano, Lorraine C. Nnacheta, Alexander T. Sandhu, Lynne Warner Stevenson, Orly Vardeny, Amanda R. Vest, Clyde W. Yancy, Joshua A. Beckman, Patrick T. O'Gara, Sana M. Al-Khatib, Anastasia L. Armbruster, Kim K. Birtcher, Joaquin E. Cigarroa, Lisa de las Fuentes, Dave L. Dixon, Lee A. Fleisher, Federico Gentile, Zachary D. Goldberger, Bulent Gorenek, Norrisa Haynes, Mark A. Hlatky, José A. Joglar, W. Schuyler Jones, Joseph E. Marine, Daniel B. Mark, Debabrata Mukherjee, Latha P. Palaniappan, Mariann R. Piano, Tanveer Rab, Erica S. Spatz, Jacqueline E. Tamis-Holland, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, and Y. Joseph Woo
- Subjects
Heart Failure ,Research Report ,Cardiology ,Humans ,American Heart Association ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,United States - Abstract
The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure.A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021.Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Inflammation, Hyperglycemia, and Adverse Outcomes in Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus Hospitalized for COVID-19
- Author
-
Alexi, Vasbinder, Elizabeth, Anderson, Husam, Shadid, Hanna, Berlin, Michael, Pan, Tariq U, Azam, Ibrahim, Khaleel, Kishan, Padalia, Chelsea, Meloche, Patrick, O'Hayer, Erinleigh, Michaud, Tonimarie, Catalan, Rafey, Feroze, Pennelope, Blakely, Christopher, Launius, Yiyuan, Huang, Lili, Zhao, Lynn, Ang, Monica, Mikhael, Kara, Mizokami-Stout, Subramaniam, Pennathur, Matthias, Kretzler, Sven H, Loosen, Athanasios, Chalkias, Frank, Tacke, Evangelos J, Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Jochen, Reiser, Jesper, Eugen-Olsen, Eva L, Feldman, Rodica, Pop-Busui, Salim S, Hayek, Kishan J, Padalia, Danny, Perry, Abbas, Bitar, Rayan, Kaakati, Beata, Samelko, Alex, Hlepas, Priya P, Patel, Xuexiang, Wang, Izzet, Altintas, Marius, Stauning, Morten, Baltzer Houlind, Mette B, Lindstrøm, Hejdi, Gamst-Jensen, Line Jee, Hartmann, Jan O, Nehlin, Thomas, Kallemose, Imran, Parvaiz, Christian, Rasmussen, Ove, Andersen, Jens, Tingleff, Maria-Evangelia, Adami, Nicky, Solomonidi, Maria, Tsilika, Maria, Saridaki, Vasileios, Lekakis, Tom, Luedde, Verena, Keitel, Eleni, Arnaoutoglou, Ioannis, Pantazopoulos, Eleni, Laou, Konstantina, Kolonia, Anargyros, Skoulakis, Pinkus, Tober-Lau, Raphael, Mohr, Florian, Kurth, Leif Erik, Sander, and Christoph, Jochum
- Subjects
Inflammation ,Male ,Advanced and Specialized Nursing ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,COVID-19 ,Middle Aged ,Hospitalization ,Hyperglycemia ,Diabetes Mellitus ,Internal Medicine ,Humans ,Female ,Hospital Mortality ,Pathophysiology/Complications ,Biomarkers - Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for reasons that are unclear. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We leveraged the International Study of Inflammation in COVID-19 (ISIC), a multicenter observational study of 2,044 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, to characterize the impact of DM on in-hospital outcomes and assess the contribution of inflammation and hyperglycemia to the risk attributed to DM. We measured biomarkers of inflammation collected at hospital admission and collected glucose levels and insulin data throughout hospitalization. The primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death, need for mechanical ventilation, and need for renal replacement therapy. RESULTS Among participants (mean age 60 years, 58.2% males), those with DM (n = 686, 33.5%) had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (37.8% vs. 28.6%) and higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers than those without DM. Among biomarkers, DM was only associated with higher soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels in multivariable analysis. Adjusting for suPAR levels abrogated the association between DM and the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio 1.23 [95% CI 0.78, 1.37]). In mediation analysis, we estimated the proportion of the effect of DM on the primary outcome mediated by suPAR at 84.2%. Hyperglycemia and higher insulin doses were independent predictors of the primary outcome, with effect sizes unaffected by adjusting for suPAR levels. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the association between DM and outcomes in COVID-19 is largely mediated by hyperinflammation as assessed by suPAR levels, while the impact of hyperglycemia is independent of inflammation.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Relationship Between Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease and Death and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
- Author
-
Alexi, Vasbinder, Chelsea, Meloche, Tariq U, Azam, Elizabeth, Anderson, Tonimarie, Catalan, Husam, Shadid, Hanna, Berlin, Michael, Pan, Patrick, O'Hayer, Kishan, Padalia, Pennelope, Blakely, Ibrahim, Khaleel, Erinleigh, Michaud, Yiyuan, Huang, Lili, Zhao, Rodica, Pop-Busui, Shruti, Gupta, Kim, Eagle, David E, Leaf, and Salim S, Hayek
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Cardiovascular Diseases ,Risk Factors ,Critical Illness ,Troponin I ,Humans ,COVID-19 ,Hospital Mortality ,Middle Aged ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,United States - Abstract
Background: Preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD) is perceived as a risk factor for poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. We sought to determine whether CVD is associated with in-hospital death and cardiovascular events in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Methods: This study used data from a multicenter cohort of adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units at 68 centers across the United States from March 1 to July 1, 2020. The primary exposure was CVD, defined as preexisting coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, or atrial fibrillation/flutter. Myocardial injury on intensive care unit admission defined as a troponin I or T level above the 99th percentile upper reference limit of normal was a secondary exposure. The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular events (cardiac arrest, new-onset arrhythmias, new-onset heart failure, myocarditis, pericarditis, or stroke) within 14 days. Results: Among 5133 patients (3231 male [62.9%]; mean age 61 years [SD, 15]), 1174 (22.9%) had preexisting CVD. A total of 1178 (34.6%) died, and 920 (17.9%) had a cardiovascular event. After adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, history of smoking, and comorbidities, preexisting CVD was associated with a 1.15 (95% CI, 0.98–1.34) higher odds of death. No independent association was observed between preexisting CVD and cardiovascular events. Myocardial injury on intensive care unit admission was associated with higher odds of death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.61–2.31]) and cardiovascular events (adjusted odds ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.47–2.24]), regardless of the presence of CVD. Conclusions: CVD risk factors, rather than CVD itself, were the major contributors to outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19. The occurrence of myocardial injury, regardless of CVD, and its association with outcomes suggests it is likely due to multiorgan injury related to acute inflammation rather than exacerbation of preexisting CVD. Registration: NCT04343898; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343898 .
- Published
- 2022
38. Impact of Social Vulnerability on Comorbid Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in the United States
- Author
-
Sarju Ganatra, Sourbha S. Dani, Ashish Kumar, Safi U. Khan, Rishi Wadhera, Tomas G. Neilan, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Ana Barac, Joerg Hermann, Monika Leja, Anita Deswal, Michael Fradley, Jennifer E. Liu, Diego Sadler, Aarti Asnani, Lauren A. Baldassarre, Dipti Gupta, Eric Yang, Avirup Guha, Sherry-Ann Brown, Jennifer Stevens, Salim S. Hayek, Charles Porter, Ankur Kalra, Suzanne J. Baron, Bonnie Ky, Salim S. Virani, Dhruv Kazi, Khurram Nasir, and Anju Nohria
- Subjects
Oncology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine - Abstract
Racial and social disparities exist in outcomes related to cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD).The aim of this cross-sectional study was to study the impact of social vulnerability on mortality attributed to comorbid cancer and CVD.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database (2015-2019) was used to obtain county-level mortality data attributed to cancer, CVD, and comorbid cancer and CVD. County-level social vulnerability index (SVI) data (2014-2018) were obtained from the CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. SVI percentiles were generated for each county and aggregated to form SVI quartiles. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were estimated and compared across SVI quartiles to assess the impact of social vulnerability on mortality related to cancer, CVD, and comorbid cancer and CVD.The AAMR for comorbid cancer and CVD was 47.75 (95% CI: 47.66-47.85) per 100,000 person-years, with higher mortality in counties with greater social vulnerability. AAMRs for cancer and CVD were also significantly greater in counties with the highest SVIs. However, the proportional increase in mortality between the highest and lowest SVI counties was greater for comorbid cancer and CVD than for either cancer or CVD alone. Adults 
- Published
- 2022
39. Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
- Author
-
Samantha K. Brenner, Tariq U. Azam, Joseph E. Parrillo, Steven M. Hollenberg, Elizabeth Anderson, Patrick O'Hayer, Hanna Berlin, Pennelope Blakley, Abbas Bitar, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
Critical Illness ,Ventricular Dysfunction, Right ,COVID-19 ,Humans ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Article - Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Metastatic melanoma of the heart: Retrospective cohort study and systematic review of prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes
- Author
-
Alexander M. Balinski, Alexi L. Vasbinder, Connor C. Kerndt, Tonimarie C. Catalan, Nathan P. Parry, Rafey A. Rehman, Pennelope Blakely, Raymond Y. Yeow, Monika J. Leja, Christopher D. Lao, Leslie A. Fecher, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Oncology ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging - Abstract
Cardiac metastasis of melanoma is rare and typically diagnosed post-mortem. Here we perform a retrospective cohort study and systematic review of patients with metastatic melanoma to characterize prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of cardiac metastasis.We reviewed the electronic medical records of all outpatients with metastatic melanoma who underwent evaluation at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor from January 2009 to January 2022, identifying patients with a clinical or histopathologic diagnosis of cardiac metastasis. We performed a systematic review of the literature to summarize the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with melanoma and cardiac metastasis.Overall, 23 of 1254 (1.8%) patients with metastatic melanoma were diagnosed with cardiac metastasis. Cardiac metastasis was reported in the right ventricle (65%), left ventricle (35%), and right atrium (35%). A total of 11 (48%) patients experienced at least one cardiovascular complication after the diagnosis of cardiac metastasis, the most common being arrhythmia (30%), heart failure (22%), and pericardial effusion (17%). Immunotherapy was more commonly used in patients with cardiac metastasis (80% vs 65%; p = 0.005). Mortality at 2-years post-diagnosis was higher for patients with cardiac metastasis compared to those without (59% vs 37%; p = 0.034). Progression of malignancy was the underlying cause of death of all patients.Cardiac metastasis occurs in2% of patients with metastatic melanoma, can affect all cardiac structures, and is associated with various cardiovascular complications and high mortality.
- Published
- 2022
41. Evolution of Care and Outcomes Across Surges in Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019
- Author
-
Patrick J O'Hayer, Alexi Vasbinder, Elizabeth Anderson, Tonimarie Catalan, Brayden Bitterman, Ibrahim Khaleel, Grace Erne, Annika Tekumulla, Caroline Tilley, Feriel Presswalla, Namratha Nelapudi, Jiazi Chen, Medha Tripathi, Matthew Rochlen, Loni Rambo, Noor Sulaiman, Pennelope Blakely, Yiyuan Huang, Lili Zhao, Rodica Pop-Busui, and Salim S. Hayek
- Subjects
General Medicine - Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has unfolded in distinct surges. Understanding how surges differ may reveal important insights into the evolution of the pandemic and improve patient care.We leveraged the Michigan Medicine COVID-19 Cohort, a prospective observational study at an academic tertiary medical center that systematically enrolled 2309 consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19, comprising 5 distinct surges.As the pandemic evolved, patients hospitalized for COVID-19 tended to have a lower burden of comorbidities and a lower inflammatory burden as measured by admission levels of C-reactive protein, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer. Use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin decreased substantially after Surge 1, while use of corticosteroids and remdesivir markedly increased (P.001 for all). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased from 18.3% in Surge 1 to 5.3% in Surge 5 (P.001). The need for mechanical ventilation significantly decreased from 42.5% in Surge 1 to 7.0% in Surge 5 (P.001), while the need for renal replacement therapy decreased from 14.4% in Surge 1 to 2.3% in Surge 5 (P.001). Differences in patient characteristics, treatments, and inflammatory markers accounted only partially for the differences in outcomes between surges.The COVID-19 pandemic has evolved significantly with respect to hospitalized patient populations and therapeutic approaches, and clinical outcomes have substantially improved. Hospitalization after the first surge was independently associated with improved outcomes, even after controlling for relevant clinical covariates.
- Published
- 2022
42. A Systematic Review of the Incidence and Outcomes of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019*
- Author
-
Salim S. Hayek, Kiran Shekar, Vishad Sheth, Jeremy Miles, Eugene Yuriditsky, Zheng Jie Lim, Priyank Shah, Ashwin Subramaniam, Baki Billah, Daryl A Jones, David E. Leaf, Afsana Afroz, J. Randall Curtis, and Mallikarjuna Ponnapa Reddy
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Resuscitation ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Return of spontaneous circulation ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cause of Death ,Humans ,Medicine ,Hospital Mortality ,Asystole ,Cause of death ,business.industry ,Incidence ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,COVID-19 ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,medicine.disease ,Heart Arrest ,Treatment Outcome ,Systematic review ,030228 respiratory system ,Emergency medicine ,Pulseless electrical activity ,business - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and to describe the characteristics and outcomes for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest within the ICU, compared with non-ICU patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. Finally, we evaluated outcomes stratified by age. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and preprint websites was conducted between January 1, 2020, and December 10, 2020. Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews identification: CRD42020203369. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on consecutive in-hospital cardiac arrest with a resuscitation attempt among patients with coronavirus disease 2019. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus or through an independent third reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eight studies reporting on 847 in-hospital cardiac arrest were included. In-hospital cardiac arrest incidence varied between 1.5% and 5.8% among hospitalized patients and 8.0-11.4% among patients in ICU. In-hospital cardiac arrest occurred more commonly in older male patients. Most initial rhythms were nonshockable (83.9%, [asystole = 36.4% and pulseless electrical activity = 47.6%]). Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 33.3%, with a 91.7% in-hospital mortality. In-hospital cardiac arrest events in ICU had higher incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (36.6% vs 18.7%; p < 0.001) and relatively lower mortality (88.7% vs 98.1%; p < 0.001) compared with in-hospital cardiac arrest in non-ICU locations. Patients greater than or equal to 60 years old had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than those less than 60 years (93.1% vs 87.9%; p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately, one in 20 patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 received resuscitation for an in-hospital cardiac arrest. Hospital survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest within the ICU was higher than non-ICU locations and seems comparable with prepandemic survival for nonshockable rhythms. Although the data provide guidance surrounding prognosis after in-hospital cardiac arrest, it should be interpreted cautiously given the paucity of information surrounding treatment limitations and resource constraints during the pandemic. Further research is into actual causative mechanisms is needed.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Management of Patients With Giant Cell Myocarditis
- Author
-
Monika Leja, Leslie T. Cooper, Anju Nohria, Rushin Patel, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Daniel J. Lenihan, Ana Barac, Frederic S. Resnic, Ajay K. Sharma, Sarju Ganatra, David M. Venesy, Thomas C. Piemonte, Richard D. Patten, Salim S. Hayek, Sourbha S. Dani, Rohan Parikh, Sachin P. Shah, Mark R. Vesely, Ghulam M. Chaudhry, Vigyan Bang, and Tomas G. Neilan
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Heart block ,Cardiogenic shock ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Immunosuppression ,Inflammation ,Disease ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,medicine.disease ,Giant cell myocarditis ,Transplantation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Heart failure ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Cardiology ,030212 general & internal medicine ,medicine.symptom ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Giant cell myocarditis is a rare, often rapidly progressive and potentially fatal, disease due to T-cell lymphocyte-mediated inflammation of the myocardium that typically affects young and middle-aged adults. Frequently, the disease course is marked by acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, intractable ventricular arrhythmias, and/or heart block. Diagnosis is often difficult due to its varied clinical presentation and overlap with other cardiovascular conditions. Although cardiac biomarkers and multimodality imaging are often used as initial diagnostic tests, endomyocardial biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis. Combination immunosuppressive therapy, along with guideline-directed medical therapy, has led to a paradigm shift in the management of giant cell myocarditis resulting in an improvement in overall and transplant-free survival. Early diagnosis and prompt management can decrease the risk of transplantation or death, which remain common in patients who present with cardiogenic shock.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Outcomes of COVID-19 in Patients With a History of Cancer and Comorbid Cardiovascular Disease
- Author
-
David M. Venesy, Sachin P. Shah, Suzanne J. Baron, Sarju Ganatra, Avirup Guha, Ana Barac, Vigyan Bang, Aarti Asnani, Simarjeet Brar, Amudha Kumar, Richard D. Patten, Robert A. Redd, Rohan Parikh, Jaymin M. Patel, Shakeeb Yunus, Kimberly M. Rieger-Christ, Salim S. Hayek, Katherine Shreyder, Krishna S Gunturu, Anne C Mosenthal, Dhruv S. Kazi, Amitoj Singh, Sourbha S. Dani, Corrine Zarwan, Rushin Patel, Anju Nohria, and Frederic S. Resnic
- Subjects
Mechanical ventilation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Public health ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Hazard ratio ,Encephalopathy ,Cancer ,Retrospective cohort study ,Disease ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,medicine.disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,business - Abstract
Background: Cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are independently associated with adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19. However, outcomes in patients with COVID-19 with both cancer and comorbid CVD are unknown. Methods: This retrospective study included 2,476 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at 4 Massachusetts hospitals between March 11 and May 21, 2020. Patients were stratified by a history of either cancer (n=195) or CVD (n=414) and subsequently by the presence of both cancer and CVD (n=82). We compared outcomes between patients with and without cancer and patients with both cancer and CVD compared with patients with either condition alone. The primary endpoint was COVID-19–associated severe disease, defined as a composite of the need for mechanical ventilation, shock, or death. Secondary endpoints included death, shock, need for mechanical ventilation, need for supplemental oxygen, arrhythmia, venous thromboembolism, encephalopathy, abnormal troponin level, and length of stay. Results: Multivariable analysis identified cancer as an independent predictor of COVID-19–associated severe disease among all infected patients. Patients with cancer were more likely to develop COVID-19–associated severe disease than were those without cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 2.02; 95% CI, 1.53–2.68; PP=.02) or CVD (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.21–2.66; P=.004) alone. Patients died more frequently if they had both cancer and CVD compared with either cancer (35% vs 17%; P=.004) or CVD (35% vs 21%; P=.009) alone. Arrhythmias and encephalopathy were also more frequent in patients with both cancer and CVD compared with those with cancer alone. Conclusions: Patients with a history of both cancer and CVD are at significantly higher risk of experiencing COVID-19–associated adverse outcomes. Aggressive public health measures are needed to mitigate the risks of COVID-19 infection in this vulnerable patient population.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with severe respiratory failure from COVID-19
- Author
-
Sobaata Chaudhry, Megan L. Krajewski, Mark E. Anderson, Sara Mirza, Tanveer Shaukat, Adam E. Green, Anip Bansal, Matthew W. Semler, David E. Leaf, David M. Charytan, Stop-Covid Investigators, Shahzad Shaefi, Anand Srivastava, Miguel A. Hernán, Keith M. Wille, Vasil Peev, Harkarandeep Singh, Brian O’Gara, Andrew J Admon, Salim S. Hayek, Shruti Gupta, Wei Wang, Samantha K Brenner, Tanya S. Johns, Amanda K. Leonberg-Yoo, Kusum S. Mathews, Ariel Mueller, and Justin Arunthamakun
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,VV-ECMO ,ARDS ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Original ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Severe respiratory failure ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Anesthesiology ,medicine ,Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ,Humans ,In patient ,Mortality ,Respiratory Distress Syndrome ,Critically ill ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Treatment Outcome ,surgical procedures, operative ,030228 respiratory system ,Respiratory failure ,Anesthesia ,Female ,business ,Cohort study - Abstract
Purpose Limited data are available on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods We examined the clinical features and outcomes of 190 patients treated with ECMO within 14 days of ICU admission, using data from a multicenter cohort study of 5122 critically ill adults with COVID-19 admitted to 68 hospitals across the United States. To estimate the effect of ECMO on mortality, we emulated a target trial of ECMO receipt versus no ECMO receipt within 7 days of ICU admission among mechanically ventilated patients with severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. The Management of Patients with Heart Failure and Diabetes
- Author
-
Tiffany Dong and Salim S. Hayek
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Truncated suPAR simultaneously causes kidney disease and autoimmune diabetes mellitus
- Author
-
Ke Zhu, Kamalika Mukherjee, Changli Wei, Salim S. Hayek, Agnieszka Collins, Changkyu Gu, Kristin Corapi, Mehmet M. Altintas, Yong Wang, Sushrut S. Waikar, Antonio C. Bianco, Jochen Reiser, and Sanja Sever
- Abstract
Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a risk factor for kidney diseases. Here we report the presence of C-terminal suPAR fragment, D2D3, in patients with diabetic nephropathy. D2D3-positive human sera inhibited glucose-stimulated insulin release in human islets and were associated with patients requiring insulin therapy. D2D3 transgenic mice presented kidney disease and diabetes marked by decreased levels of insulin and C-peptide, impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, decreased pancreatic β-cell mass, and high fasting glucose. D2D3 fragment dysregulated glucose-induced cytoskeletal dynamics, impaired maturation and trafficking of insulin granules, and inhibited bioenergetics of β-cells in culture. An anti-uPAR antibody restored β-cell function in D2D3 transgenic mice. We show that the D2D3 fragment injures the kidney and pancreas, offering a unique dual therapeutic approach for kidney diseases and insulin-dependent diabetes.SummaryProteolytic suPAR fragment, D2D3, simultaneously injures two organs, the kidney and pancreas, thus causing a dual organ disease.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Author
-
Paul A. Heidenreich, Biykem Bozkurt, David Aguilar, Larry A. Allen, Joni J. Byun, Monica M. Colvin, Anita Deswal, Mark H. Drazner, Shannon M. Dunlay, Linda R. Evers, James C. Fang, Savitri E. Fedson, Gregg C. Fonarow, Salim S. Hayek, Adrian F. Hernandez, Prateeti Khazanie, Michelle M. Kittleson, Christopher S. Lee, Mark S. Link, Carmelo A. Milano, Lorraine C. Nnacheta, Alexander T. Sandhu, Lynne Warner Stevenson, Orly Vardeny, Amanda R. Vest, and Clyde W. Yancy
- Subjects
Heart Failure ,Research Report ,Physiology (medical) ,Cardiology ,Humans ,American Heart Association ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Cardiovascular System ,United States - Abstract
Aim: The “2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure” replaces the “2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure” and the “2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure.” The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. Structure: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients’ interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.
- Published
- 2022
49. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Author
-
Paul A. Heidenreich, Biykem Bozkurt, David Aguilar, Larry A. Allen, Joni J. Byun, Monica M. Colvin, Anita Deswal, Mark H. Drazner, Shannon M. Dunlay, Linda R. Evers, James C. Fang, Savitri E. Fedson, Gregg C. Fonarow, Salim S. Hayek, Adrian F. Hernandez, Prateeti Khazanie, Michelle M. Kittleson, Christopher S. Lee, Mark S. Link, Carmelo A. Milano, Lorraine C. Nnacheta, Alexander T. Sandhu, Lynne Warner Stevenson, Orly Vardeny, Amanda R. Vest, and Clyde W. Yancy
- Subjects
Research Report ,Heart Failure ,Physiology (medical) ,Cardiology ,Humans ,American Heart Association ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Cardiovascular System ,United States - Abstract
Aim: The “2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure” replaces the “2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure” and the “2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure.” The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. Structure: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients’ interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.
- Published
- 2022
50. 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary
- Author
-
Paul A, Heidenreich, Biykem, Bozkurt, David, Aguilar, Larry A, Allen, Joni-J, Byun, Monica M, Colvin, Anita, Deswal, Mark H, Drazner, Shannon M, Dunlay, Linda R, Evers, James C, Fang, Savitri E, Fedson, Gregg C, Fonarow, Salim S, Hayek, Adrian F, Hernandez, Prateeti, Khazanie, Michelle M, Kittleson, Christopher S, Lee, Mark S, Link, Carmelo A, Milano, Lorraine C, Nnacheta, Alexander T, Sandhu, Lynne Warner, Stevenson, Orly, Vardeny, Amanda R, Vest, and Clyde W, Yancy
- Subjects
Heart Failure ,Research Report ,Cardiology ,Humans ,American Heart Association ,United States - Abstract
The 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America (AHA/ACC/HFSA) Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure replaces the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure and the 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with heart failure.A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews and other evidence conducted in human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies published through September 2021 were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021.Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments that have high-quality published economic analyses.
- Published
- 2022
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.