Search

In this study, the authors investigated the ablation success of scar homogenization with combined (epicardial + endocardial) vs endocardial-only approach for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) at 5 years of follow-up.Best ablation approach to achieve long-term success rate in VT patients with ICM is not known yet.Consecutive ICM patients undergoing VT ablation at our center were classified into group 1: endocardial + epicardial scar homogenization and group 2: endocardial scar homogenization. Patients with previous open heart surgery were excluded. Epicardial ablation was performed despite being noninducible after endocardial ablation in all group 1 patients. All patients underwent bipolar substrate mapping with standard scar settings defined as normal tissue1.5 mV and severe scar 0.5 mV. Noninducibility of monomorphic VT was the procedural endpoint in both groups. Patients were followed up every 4 months for 5 years with implantable device interrogations.A total of 361 patients (group 1: n = 70 and group 2: n = 291) were included in the study. At 5 years, 81.4% (n = 57/70) patients from group 1 and 66.3% (n = 193/291) from group 2 were arrhythmia-free (P = 0.01) Of those patients, 26 of 57 (45.6%) and 172 of 193 (89.1%) from group 1 and group 2 respectively were on anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) (log-rank P0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and obstructive sleep apnea, endo-epicardial scar homogenization was associated with a significant reduction in arrhythmia-recurrence (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27-0.86; P = 0.02).In this series of patients with ICM and VT, epicardial substrate was detected in all group 1 patients despite being noninducible after endocardial ablation. Moreover, combined endo-epicardial scar homogenization was associated with a significantly higher success rate at 5 years of follow-up and a substantially lower need for antiarrhythmic drugs after the procedure compared with the endocardial ablation alone.

AimsThis study aimed to examine the clinical benefits of targeted ablation of all Premature ventricular complex (PVC) morphologies vs. predominant PVC only.Methods and resultsA total of 171 consecutive patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ≥2 PVC morphology with high burden (>10%/day) undergoing their first ablation procedure were included in the analysis. At the initial procedure, prevalent PVC alone was ablated in the majority. However, at the redo, all PVC morphologies were targeted for ablation. : At the first procedure, 152 (89%) patients received ablation of the dominant PVC only. In the remaining 19 (11%) patients, all PVC morphologies were ablated. At two years, high PVC burden was detected in 89 (52%) patients. Repeat procedure was performed in 78 of 89, where all PVC morphologies were ablated. At 5 years after the repeat procedure, 71 (91%) had PVC burden of ConclusionIn this observational series, ablation of all PVC morphologies was associated with significantly lower PVC burden and improvement of LVEF at long-term follow-up, compared with ablation of the dominant morphology only.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC) are common arrhythmias. We aimed to investigate AF prevalence in patients with PVC and its impact on PVC ablation outcomes.Consecutive patients undergoing PVC ablation at a single institution between 2016 and 2019 were included and prospectively followed for 2 years. Patients with severe valvular heart disease, hyperthyroidism, malignancy, alcohol use disorder and advanced renal/hepatic diseases were excluded. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were used to diagnose AF and assess PVC morphology. All PVCs were targeted for ablation using 4-mm irrigated-tip catheters at standardized radiofrequency power guided by 3-D mapping and intracardiac echocardiography. Patients were followed with remote monitoring, device interrogations and office visits every 6 months for 2 years. Detection of any PVCs in follow-up was considered as recurrence.A total of 394 patients underwent PVC ablation and 96 (24%) had concurrent AF. Patients with PVC and AF were significantly older (68.2 ± 10.8 vs. 58.3 ± 15.8 years, p .001), had lower LV ejection fraction (43.3 ± 13.3% vs. 49.6 ± 12.4%, p .001), higher CHAAF was documented in 1/4 of patients undergoing PVC ablation and was associated with lower procedural success at long-term follow-up. This was likely attributed to older age, worse LV function and higher prevalence of multiple PVC morphologies in patients with concurrent AF.