Search

Background: Despite evidence of substantial breast cancer risk reduction, few high-risk women adopt chemopreventive medications such as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Women with benign breast disease, such as atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), have an increased risk of developing breast cancer and derive a greater benefit from antiestrogens compared to other high-risk women. Reasons for low uptake of chemoprevention include insufficient patient and clinician knowledge about antiestrogens, time constraints during the clinical encounter, and concerns about side effects. To address these barriers, we have developed patient and provider web-based decision support tools to improve informed choice about breast cancer chemoprevention among women with AH or LCIS. Study design: We are conducting a cluster-randomized controlled trial of clinical decision support to improve chemoprevention informed choice among women with AH or LCIS and their treating providers. Twenty-six U.S. sites through the SWOG Cancer Research Network were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard educational materials alone or in combination with the patient-centered decision aid (RealRisks) and provider decision support tool (BNAV). A total of 415 patients and 200 healthcare providers will be recruited from these sites. RealRisks consists of interactive modules to calculate personalized breast cancer risk and elicit preferences on chemoprevention. The modules are available in English and Spanish. BNAV is comprised of self-directed case-based learning modules on breast cancer risk assessment and chemoprevention. Patients complete questionnaires at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Providers complete surveys at baseline and after their enrolled patient’s 6-month clinical encounter. The primary endpoint is chemoprevention informed choice at 6 months, using a measure combining knowledge, attitude, and intention scales. Secondary endpoints include perceived breast cancer risk/worry, chemoprevention knowledge/intention, decision conflict/regret, shared decision-making, and chemoprevention uptake. For patients who begin chemoprevention, adherence and reasons for discontinuation are assessed annually for up to 5 years. Barriers and facilitators to implementing RealRisks and BNAV into clinic workflow will be assessed by conducting patient and provider interviews at baseline and mid-implementation. Eligibility criteria: Eligible patients include women, age 35-74 years, with AH or LCIS, no history of breast cancer, no prior use of SERMs or AIs, no bilateral mastectomies, English or Spanish-speaking, and access to the internet. Eligible providers include breast surgeons, medical oncologists, primary care providers, and physician extenders who see patients with AH or LCIS. Statistical methods: We have 90% power to detect a 15% increase in the frequency of chemoprevention informed choice with a 1-sided 0.025 level test, assuming an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.02 to account for clustering, roughly equal accrual at each site, 10% loss to follow-up, and ≤10% event rate in the control arm. Current/target accrual: The trial was activated on 9/1/2020. As of 7/7/2022, all 26 sites have been randomized, 157/200 providers and 184/415 patients have been enrolled. Discussion: Our hybrid effectiveness/implementation study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-level intervention in promoting informed decision-making about breast cancer chemoprevention. Study results will provide valuable insights on how the decision support tools are integrated in diverse clinical settings. Citation Format: Katherine D. Crew, Garnet Anderson, Kathryn Arnold, Andrew Stieb, Jacquelyn N. Amenta, Cynthia Law, Ana Sandoval-Leon, Sarah Colonna, Tari King, Debra Mangino, Sandhya Pruthi, Maria Grosse Perdekamp, Christa Braun-Inglis, Stacy Krisher, Lisa Yee, Danielle Bertoni, Samantha Seaward, Kari B. Wisinski, Justin Floyd, Corrine Zarwan, Tarah J. Ballinger, Lindi VanderWalde, Masey M. Ross, Preston Steen, Shelly Lo, Alison Conlin, Kathleen Yost, John Ellerton, Erin Lin, Holly J. Pederson, Sagar Sardesai, Cheryl Jernigan, Dawn Hershman, Marian L. Neuhouser, Banu K. Arun, Rita Kukafka. SWOG 1904: Cluster-randomized controlled trial of patient and provider decision support to increase chemoprevention informed choice among women with atypical hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ (MiCHOICE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-15-01.

Background: SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG is FDA approved for pts with mTNBC who received ≥2 prior chemotherapies (≥1 in the metastatic setting). The confirmatory phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) in pts treated in second line or greater (2L+) mTNBC demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit of SG over single-agent chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (median PFS: 4.8 vs 1.7 months, HR 0.43, P Citation Format: Javier Cortés, Aditya Bardia, Delphine Loirat, Sara M. Tolaney, Kevin Punie, Mafalda Oliveira, Sara A. Hurvitz, Adam Brufsky, Sagar Sardesai, Kevin M Kalinsky, Tiffany Traina, Erika Hamilton, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Véronique Diéras, Lisa A. Carey, Martine Piccart, Sibylle Loibl, Hope S. Rugo, Yanni Zhu, See Phan, Luca Gianni. Post-progression therapy outcomes in patients (pts) from the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-15.

Background Chemotherapy induces neurocognitive impairment ranging from mild subjective symptoms to functional limitations of daily living. Common subjective symptoms patients report after chemotherapy include memory and concentration difficulties that are not always captured by standard neurocognitive testing (P.A. Ganz, 2012 and 2013). The goal of this retrospective study was to examine the result of a detailed neurocognitive testing battery in women with breast cancer (BC) who were self-reporting cognitive concerns. Methods This was a retrospective single center study on BC patients who had undergone treatment with surgical resection, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and/or radiation therapy and completed outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. Neurocognitive tests included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Trails Making test, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographics, clinical characteristics and neurocognitive test scores. Comparisons of neurocognitive scores between patients receiving chemotherapy, radiation, chemotherapy and radiation, or no chemotherapy or radiation were assessed using Wilcoxon sign tests. Results Fifty-three women with BC were included. The average age was 55 (STD 11) years; 39 (74%) patients underwent chemotherapy. Of the patients who underwent chemotherapy, 24 (62%) underwent anthracycline-based therapy, and 10 (26%) underwent non-anthracycline based therapy. Thirty-six (68%) patients had invasive ductal carcinoma, and 8 (15%) had invasive lobular carcinoma. Most patients were either stage 1 or 2, 17 (32%) and 20 (38%), respectively. Additionally, 68% (36 patients) were ER positive, 25% (13) were ER negative, and 49% (26) were PR positive with 42% (22) PR negative. Twelve (22%) patients were HER2 positive, and 31 (59%) were HER2 negative. Results from the neurocognitive tests evaluated are included in Table 1. Results showed that the longest times to complete the Trails tests were in patients who underwent both chemotherapy and radiation (three times more errors in this group than the group who did not undergo any treatment), and the increase in errors in the WCST in patients receiving chemotherapy was two and a half times greater than the no treatment group, although results were not statistically significant. Conclusions This study highlights the challenges of finding reliable assessment tools for measuring cognitive concerns in BC survivors. On a highly selected group of patients with self-reported cognitive concerns, we did not find statistically significant differences in neurocognitive testing across different treatment arms. The Trails tests and WCST both examine the same domain of executive functioning and are a detailed way of examining this aspect of neurocognitive functioning. Although no difference was detected between treatment groups for the Trails tests and the WCST, the changes in the number of errors in the WCST and the Trails B sorting time, which is influenced by the Trails A test, suggest that there are likely quantifiable changes experienced by BC patients undergoing chemotherapy compared to those who do not undergo chemotherapy. Future work will expand on these results by examining a larger sample of BC patients and by comparing them to their age-matched peers without cancer. Table 1.Neurocognitive test results listed as Median [Interquartile Range].VariableNo chemotherapy, no radiation (n=6)Chemotherapy, no radiation (n=15)No chemotherapy, radiation (n=8)Chemotherapy and radiation (n=24)P-valueMMSE t-score48 [29, 50]47 [42, 50]46.5 [34, 54]47 [43, 57]0.850Trials A time (seconds)33 [31, 38]32.5 [25, 42]37 [23, 55]32 [27, 44]0.940Trails B time (seconds)86 [47, 87]90 [69, 124]82 [48, 109]99 [80, 137]0.460WCST-128 total errors raw score14 [14, 53]36 [13, 47]20 [10, 53]48 [22, 68]0.175 Citation Format: Jessica Sharpe, Marilly Palettas, Michael Grimm, Mahmoud Kassem, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Robert Wesolowski, Nicole Williams, Sagar Sardesai, Daniel Stover, Jeffrey VanDeusen, Mathew Cherian, Ashley Pariser, Margaret Gatti-Mays, Maryam Lustberg, Laura Boxley. Examining neurocognitive function in breast-cancer patients after chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-08.

Background: CDK7 inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy in cancer; acting as a regulator of the cell cycle, transcription and endocrine receptor signalling [1]. Patients with HR+BC post CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment have a poor prognosis; median progression free survival (mPFS) of ~ 8 weeks for fulvestrant post CDK4/6i in HR+BC [2,3]. Pre-clinical HR+BC models indicate the potential for synergy when the CDK7 inhibitor samuraciclib is combined with the Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader fulvestrant [4]Materials and Methods: This single arm cohort assessed the tolerability and efficacy of samuraciclib in combination with standard dose fulvestrant in patients with advanced HR+BC; all patients had previously received an aromatase inhibitor and a CDK4/6i for advanced disease.Results: 31 patients with HR+BC received the combination of standard dose with fulvestrant and samuraciclib. 6 patients received samuraciclib dose of 240mg once daily (QD) and 25 patients a dose of 360mg QD. The combination treatment was generally well tolerated, with adverse drug reactions (AE) of note being G1-2 nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea; the majority of patients staying on treatment until disease progression.RECIST evaluation indicates evidence of reduction in tumor disease burden, including a partial response in one patient who has been on treatment for ~ 1 year.Graphic illustrations of data, including ‘waterfall’ and ‘swimmer’ plots, will be presented along with stratification data based on demographic factors such as hepatic involvement and cfDNA analysis (ESR1m, PI3Km).Conclusions: Samuraciclib has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with evidence of anti-tumour activity in combination with fulvestrant for patients with advanced HR+BC who have progressed on their prior CDK4/6i.References:1.Patel et al., Mol Cancer Therap. 20182.Juric et al., SABCS 20183.Lindeman et al., JCO 20214.Jeselsohn et al., SABCS 2019 Citation Format: Charles Coombes, Sasha J Howell, Matthew G Krebs, Simon Lord, Laura M Kenny, Ash Bahl, Glen Clack, Edward Ainscow, Paul A Dickinson, Raluca Fostea, Janine Mansi, Carlo Palmieri, Gianflippo Bertelli, Rinath Jeselsohn, Zahi Mitri, William J Gradishar, Sagar Sardesai, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Patrick Ward, Pavani Chalasani, Manfred Lehnert, Simak Ali, Stuart McIntosh. Study of samuraciclib (CT7001), a first-in-class, oral, selective inhibitor of CDK7, in combination with fulvestrant in patients with advanced hormone receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer (HR+BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-10.

Background: Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) over time allows non-invasive evaluation of tumor genomic evolution. We characterize changes in tumor fraction (TFx), somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), and somatic mutations over time in patients (pts) with and without BRCA1/2 mutations and metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who received a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) or platinum chemotherapy. Specifically, we seek to identify the frequency of BRCA1/2 reversion mutations. Methods: Pts with mBC and germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were identified on a banking protocol of prospectively-collected serial samples of blood and plasma. Control pts without a BRCA1/2 mutation were matched 2:1 by age and hormone receptor (HR) status. Ultra-low-pass whole genome sequencing (ULPWGS) with 0.1x depth was performed on all plasma samples (n=103) and the ichorCNA algorithm was used to determine TFx and SCNAs. Targeted panel sequencing (TPS) of 402 cancer-related genes was performed at 10,000x depth on plasma samples, and one blood sample per pt. The panel includes BRCA1/2 and 38 other DNA damage repair (DDR) genes. Somatic mutations were identified by joint calling with Mutect2 across plasma timepoints with paired pt normal blood. Germline variant calling from TPS on blood with HaplotypeCaller was used to confirm germline mutations in BRCA1/2. Results: We identified 10 pts with mBC with a germline (n=7) or somatic (n=3) BRCA1 (n=2) or BRCA2 (n=8) mutation and banked blood and plasma samples at 2-9 timepoints at a median of 8 weeks apart (range 1-43). The control cohort of 20 pts with mBC and wildtype BRCA1/2 was well matched by age and HR status. All pts with BRCA1/2 mutations received a PARPi and/or platinum chemotherapy at some point during sample collection. Half of control pts received platinum chemotherapy. Germline BRCA1/2 mutations were confirmed in all 7 pts with known germline mutations. Somatic BRCA2 mutations were confirmed in ctDNA in 2 of 3 patients. Among all samples, median TFx was 0.05 (range 0-0.80) with 35% of samples having TFx >0.10. There was no significant difference in TFx by age, receptor status, or active treatment with a PARPi or platinum. There was no significant change in the percent of genome with a SCNA over time. A reversion mutation of a germline BRCA2 mutation, restoring the open reading frame of BRCA2, was discovered at the last timepoint from 1 pt while receiving carboplatin. She had radiographic progression 4 weeks later. A germline BRCA1/2 reversion mutation in this cohort occurred in 2.3% of samples, 14.3% of pts. The somatic mutation landscape and clonal evolution of TPS using PyClone will be presented. Clonal evolution can show emerging and responding clusters of variants. For pts with available tissue specimens, somatic variants in ctDNA will be compared to somatic mutations detected in tissue with TPS. Conclusions: Evaluation of serial ctDNA samples for TFx, SCNAs, and somatic mutations from banked plasma and blood from pts with mBC is feasible. SCNAs were stable over time. The frequency of reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 was low, suggesting that either their incidence is low or ctDNA TPS is not sensitive enough to detect them. Citation Format: Katharine A Collier, David Tallman, Zachary T. Weber, Marcy Haynam, Elizabeth J. Adams, Janet Jenison, Sarah Asad, Maryam Lustberg, Mathew Cherian, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Sagar Sardesai, Nicole Williams, Robert Wesolowski, Jeffrey Vandeusen, Margaret E. Gatti-Mays, Ashley Pariser, Amir Mortazavi, Daniel G. Stover. Serial circulating tumor DNA from patients with metastatic breast cancer with and without BRCA1/2 mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-09.

Background: Approximately 10% of breast cancers (BC) are hormone receptor positive (HR+) and HER2 positive (HER2+). Despite treatment advances in the modern era of HER2 targeted therapies for early-stage disease, there remains a risk for late relapses. However, the role of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) to reduce recurrence in this BC subtype is unclear. Oncologists employ clinical judgment given lack of consensus, resulting in differences in treatment patterns. The ideal endocrine agent including the role of adding ovarian suppression (OS) in premenopausal women is unknown. These patients are largely underrepresented in clinical trials such as the phase III SOFT and TEXT studies. Additionally, these trials were initiated prior to the widespread use of trastuzumab with chemotherapy, which is now standard of care for HER2+ disease. We aimed to describe real world patterns surrounding choice of adjuvant ET and clinicopathologic features which predicted treatment with OS in premenopausal women with HR+/HER2+ BC. Methods: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of premenopausal women with non-metastatic HR+/HER2+ BC in the American Society of Clinical Oncology CancerlinQ® Discovery database from January 2010 to May 2020. Electronic health record data was obtained from 74 participating academic and community oncology sites. We collected clinical data on women less than 50 years who received chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab with or without pertuzumab), and ET. Adjuvant OS was defined as receipt of at least 6 months of goserelin or leuprolide or surgical bilateral oophorectomy. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment history was collected. Patients were categorized into 1 of 4 groups based on type of adjuvant ET prescribed at treatment initiation: aromatase inhibitor (AI) + OS, OS, tamoxifen + OS, or tamoxifen. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the association between clinicopathologic features and OS use. Results: Out of 360,540 patients with invasive breast cancer in the database, 937 met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 41.7 (SD 5.9) years; 83% had stage 1 or 2 BC and 78% had node positive disease. The majority (n=818, 87%) were prescribed tamoxifen whereas only 4 (0.4%), 50 (5.3%), and 65 (6.9%) received OS, tamoxifen + OS, and AI + OS, respectively. Table 1 includes demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort. No clinicopathologic features predicted OS use apart from age; patients ≥35 years were less likely to receive OS compared with those < 35 (p< 0.001) (table 2). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first real world study evaluating OS treatment in HR+/HER2+ BC. The use of OS was uncommon; this suggests a perception of its limited benefit when added to HER2-targeted therapy. Most patients received tamoxifen as the ET of choice. Age was the only factor to predict OS treatment; high risk features including node positivity and higher stage was not associated with its use. This highlights the wide variability in real world practice surrounding the clinical indications for OS. Further investigation is warranted to characterize the utility of ET including addition of OS to prevent recurrence in premenopausal HR+/HER2+ BC. This will better inform a personalized approach to tailor therapy for optimal outcomes in this distinct BC subtype. Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants by endocrine therapy treatment group. Table 2. Multivariable logistic regression model of clinicopathologic characteristics to predict use of ovarian suppression. Citation Format: Jasmine S. Sukumar, Sagar Sardesai, Andy Ni, Nicole Williams, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Robert Wesolowski, Mathew A. Cherian, Daniel Stover, Margaret Gatti-Mays, Ashley C. Pariser, Preeti K. Sudheendra, Mridula A. George, maryam lustberg. Real World Treatment Patterns of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy and Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal HR+/HER2+ Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-02-03.

Purpose: Immune infiltration is associated with better treatment response and outcomes in breast cancer, yet data regarding the role of modifiable patient factors in immune infiltration are limited. Patients and Methods: This population-based, prospective observational study evaluated 882 Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and NHSII participants diagnosed with invasive breast cancer with detailed exposure and gene expression data. Of these, 262 women (training cohort) had breast tumor immunohistochemistry (IHC) for four canonical immune cell markers: CD8, CD4, CD20, CD163. In this training cohort, 105 published immune cell-specific gene expression signatures were calculated, then lasso regression was used to derive four immune cell-specific scores based on association with IHC. In the remaining 620 patient testing cohort, we evaluated association of each immune-cell specific score as outcomes, with body mass index (BMI) change since age 18, physical activity, and the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) score as predictors, using multivariable-adjusted linear regression. Results: Among women with paired expression/IHC data from breast tumor tissue, we identified robust correlation between novel immune cell-specific expression scores and IHC (Spearman’s rho range 0.42-0.54; all p Citation Format: Daniel G. Stover, Adrienne Damicis, Yujing J. Heng, Katharine A. Collier, Elizabeth J. Adams, Kevin H. Kensler, Gabrielle M. Baker, Robert Wesolowski, Sagar Sardesai, Margaret Gatti-Mays, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, A. Heather Eliassen, Susan E. Hankinson, Fred K. Tabung, Rulla M. Tamimi, Sarah Asad. Association of body mass index and inflammatory dietary pattern with breast cancer pathologic and genomic immunophenotype in the nurses’ health study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-11.

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) intervention in the breast cancer population. Methods. This single-arm feasibility study evaluated a 14-week CR intervention program in breast cancer survivors. Feasibility was defined as completion of at least 30/36 sessions of the program without serious adverse events (SAE) in 80% of patients. Secondary endpoints included the change in VO2 max, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, Duke Activity Secondary Index (DASI), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and QLQ-C30. All outcomes were reported as mean change and compared using paired t-tests. Results. A total of 25 patients were enrolled in the study. 18 patients of the 25 enrolled (72%) completed the 14 weeks program without SAE. The overall adherence to the study protocol was 60%. Of the 18 participants who did not withdraw from the program, 15 (83%) adhered to the study protocol and completed 30 or more sessions. There was a nonsignificant improvement in VO2 max (mean Δ0.5, p = 0.6 ). The scores for DASI, BFI, and QLQ-C30 improved from baseline to posttreatment. Conclusion. A CR intervention in breast cancer survivors had high adherence in those who were able to complete the 14-week program. The program significantly improved patient reported physical activity, fatigue, and quality of life (QoL), without significant improvement in CVD risk factors. Implications for cancer patients are that early implementation of a CR program should be considered by practitioners as it improves QoL and exercise tolerance in breast cancer survivors.

Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease and we have previously shown that rapid relapse of TNBC is associated with distinct sociodemographic features. We hypothesized that rapid versus late relapse in TNBC is also defined by distinct clinical and genomic features of primary tumors. Methods Using three publicly-available datasets, we identified 453 patients diagnosed with primary TNBC with adequate follow-up to be characterized as ‘rapid relapse’ (rrTNBC; distant relapse or death ≤2 years of diagnosis), ‘late relapse’ (lrTNBC; > 2 years) or ‘no relapse’ (nrTNBC: > 5 years no relapse/death). We explored basic clinical and primary tumor multi-omic data, including whole transcriptome (n = 453), and whole genome copy number and mutation data for 171 cancer-related genes (n = 317). Association of rapid relapse with clinical and genomic features were assessed using Pearson chi-squared tests, t-tests, ANOVA, and Fisher exact tests. We evaluated logistic regression models of clinical features with subtype versus two models that integrated significant genomic features. Results Relative to nrTNBC, both rrTNBC and lrTNBC had significantly lower immune signatures and immune signatures were highly correlated to anti-tumor CD8 T-cell, M1 macrophage, and gamma-delta T-cell CIBERSORT inferred immune subsets. Intriguingly, lrTNBCs were enriched for luminal signatures. There was no difference in tumor mutation burden or percent genome altered across groups. Logistic regression mModels that incorporate genomic features significantly outperformed standard clinical/subtype models in training (n = 63 patients), testing (n = 63) and independent validation (n = 34) cohorts, although performance of all models were overall modest. Conclusions We identify clinical and genomic features associated with rapid relapse TNBC for further study of this aggressive TNBC subset.

Background: Breast cancer treatment includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), offered to patients with locally advanced breast cancer and who may benefit from down-staging before conservation therapy. NAC allows for evaluation of treatment response with pathologic complete response (pCR) acting as a marker of survival. Black women receive NAC more frequently as they often present with more advanced stage tumors and the triple negative subtype. Furthermore, Black women without pCR following NAC are at greater risk of mortality. Obesity is a prognostic factor for breast cancer. Non-Hispanic Black women have the greatest prevalence of obesity in most states. Patients with higher Body Mass Index (BMI) have previously been shown to have lower rates of chemotherapy response. Data on racial and ethnic differences in pCR rates are limited and whether obesity is a confounding factor requires investigation. Methods: Retrospective review of patients diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer who completed NAC and had surgery at Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2019, were analyzed. Clinical stage was calculated based on tumor size and nodal status. Operative treatment received was recorded to determine pathologic stage and chemotherapy response. The study endpoint, pCR, was assessed after definitive surgery. BMI categories were based on World Health Organization classification and obese defined as 30kg/m2. For the data analysis, we included self-reported Black and White women, excluding patients classified as “Other” race. Preliminary analyses included the distribution of sample descriptive characteristics. Differences by race and demographic characteristics were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables and t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression for pCR by age, race, BMI, menopausal status, insurance status and employment status were performed. Results: A final sample of 882 met criteria (11.7% Black and 88.3% white women, 1% Hispanic ethnicity). Median age of diagnosis is 51, with median 147.4 months of follow-up. 64% of the sample had clinical stage 2 disease, 22% were triple negative, 62% Her-2 positive subtypes. For tumor characteristics 67% of Black women and 59% white women had high grade tumor. Black women also had more triple negative disease (30% vs. 21%), more advanced stage at presentation (27% vs. 21%). More white women were employed and had private insurance compared to Black women, who predominantly had public insurance. The median BMI was higher among Black women (31.5) than white women (28.6). 52% of white women vs. 47% Black had mastectomy over lumpectomy. 67% of white women had radiation vs. 61% of Black women. Overall, 33% of Black and white women had pCR, with 67% having no pCR. Race and BMI were not significant predictors of PCR rates on univariate or multivariable analysis. Age < 40 is the only variable associated with pCR (OR 1.645, [95 CI 1.117-2.420] p-value: 0.012). Conclusions: BMI was not a significant predictor of pCR in this limited retrospective review. However, further exploration with a larger sample evaluating differences in pCR by BMI can lead to a better understanding of the association between obesity and pCR. Though race was not significant in predicting pCR, there is also room for further research considering socioeconomic disparities and obesity rates by race. Table 1. Table 1. Predictors for pCR. Table 1. Multivariable logistic regression for pCR adjusted by age, race, BMI, menopause status, insurance status, employment status. Univariate analysis for predictors of pCR performed for race and BMI. Citation Format: Ruvarashe Rumano, Michael Grimm, Marilly Palettas, Julie Stephens, Nicole Williams, Sagar Sardesai, Dionisia Quiroga, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Electra Paskett, Bridget Oppong. Differences in breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by race- Is obesity the key? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-01-06.

Background: Dietary patterns promoting chronic inflammation, including the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP), have been shown to strongly influence risk of weight gain, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and colorectal cancer. However, it is unclear if this dietary pattern is associated with other tumors in which the mechanisms are not totally understood such as breast cancer. Methods: We prospectively followed 76,295 women from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS, 1984-2016) and 91,078 women from the Nurses’ Health Study II (NHSII, 1991-2017). Diet was assessed by food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) every 4 years. The inflammatory potential of diet was evaluated using the previously established EDIP based on plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor 2 (TNF-αR2). Higher scores indicate higher inflammatory potential of the diet. Results: During 4,153,676 person-years of follow-up, we documented 10,632 invasive breast cancer cases (6,807 NHS; 3,825 NHSII). In the pooled multivariable-adjusted analyses, women in the highest, compared with the lowest, EDIP quintile were at higher breast cancer risk (HRQ5vsQ1=1.12; 95% CI 1.05, 1.20; P-trend< 0.001). This association was attenuated after adjusting for weight change since age 18 y, although it remained significant (HRQ5vsQ1=1.07; 95% CI 1.00, 1.14; P-trend=0.01). In subtype analyses, we found evidence that the inflammatory potential of diet influenced breast cancer risk differentially by ER status (P-heterogeneity=0.038) and by molecular phenotype (P-heterogeneity=0.007), with the association between EDIP and breast cancer limited to ER-negative tumors (HRQ5vsQ1=1.31; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.55; P-trend=0.002; for ER-positive tumors, HR Q5vsQ1=1.03; 95% CI, 0.96, 1.12;P-trend=0.10) and basal-like tumors (HRQ5vsQ1=1.78; 95% CI: 1.19, 2.65; P-trend=0.004). Further adjustment for weight change since age 18 y did not materially alter the association for these subtypes. Conclusions: Dietary patterns with high potential to contribute to chronic systemic inflammation, based on higher EDIP scores, were associated with a modestly increased risk of breast cancer, which was more pronounced for ER-negative and basal-like breast tumors. Citation Format: Andrea Romanos-Nanclares, Walter C Willett, Bernard A Rosner, Daniel G Stover, Sarah Asad, Sagar Sardesai, Michelle D Holmes, Wendy Y Chen, Rulla M. Tamimi, Fred K Tabung, A Heather Eliassen. Proinflammatory Dietary Patterns and Risk of Total and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among US Women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-03-14.

Background: Hormone receptor (HR) low (1-10%) HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) is emerging as a distinct subtype with similarities in clinical outcomes to triple-negative BC. However, there is a lack of consensus on treatment recommendations for chemo-immunotherapy and endocrine therapy in this subset. Here, we present results from a US National Cancer Database (NCDB) analyses of patients with HER2-negative BC evaluating response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and patterns of care by HR expression. Methods: Patients with stage I-III HER2-negative BC diagnosed in 2018 were identified in NCDB, a nationwide oncology outcomes database in the US. Quantitative HR expression was unavailable prior to 2018. Data were categorized into four groups by estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression: ER< 1% & PR< 1% (HR-Neg), ER 1-10% and/or PR 1-10% (HR-Low), ER >11-30% and/or PR>11-30% (HR-Int), ER> 30% and/or PR > 30% (HR-High). Those with undocumented HR status (3%) or without curative intent surgery (5%) were excluded. The primary outcome was pathologic complete response (pCR) by HR expression in those undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Key secondary objectives included assessment of clinicopathologic characteristics and practice patterns. The categorical variables were compared between the four groups using a Chi-square test. Age was compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Out of 104,205 incident cases, 2541 (2.4%) were HR-Low and 1241 (1.2%) were HR-Int. Significant differences were found between HR groups with higher grade, clinical stage, and Ki-67 in HR-Low vs. HR-Int or HR-High groups (Table 1). Patients with HR-Low and HR-Int BC were more likely to receive chemotherapy than HR-High (74%, 70% vs. 20%; p < 0.001) and the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy correlated with HR expression. Only half of patients in the HR-Low group received any endocrine therapy compared to higher rates in the HR-Int and HR-High groups (52% vs. 74%, 92%; p< 0.001). pCR rates in those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly different by HR status, with higher pCR rates in HR-Low vs. HR-High groups (p< 0.001) (Table 2). NAC utilization significantly differed between groups. A higher proportion of patients with HR-Low BC received NAC than other HR-positive groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was an increased use of NAC in patients with HR-Low BC treated at academic vs. community cancer centers (p< 0.001). Conclusions: This is one of the largest real-world analyses comparing key differences in biology and practice patterns of HR-Low, HER2-negative BC. Consistent with prior studies, we report HR-Low BC to be a rare and distinct subtype with higher pCR rates compared to HR-High BC. Practice patterns show wide variability in utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for these patients. Future studies should address this disparity and enhance representation of patients with HR-Low BC in clinical trials to improve long-term outcomes. Table 1: Patient demographics Table 2: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy response amongst differing HR expression levels Citation Format: Dionisia Quiroga, Michael Grimm, Julie Stephens, Kai Johnson, Nicole Williams, Preeti K. Sudheendra, Mathew A. Cherian, Daniel Stover, Ashley C. Pariser, Margaret Gatti-Mays, Robert Wesolowski, Jose G. Bazan, Sasha Beyer, Ko Un Park, Bridget Oppong, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Julia White, Sachin R. Jhawar, Sagar Sardesai. Impact of low hormone receptor expression on neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and patterns of care in early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer: a US National Cancer Database analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-17.

Background: Trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is highly expressed in many epithelial tumors, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38, an active metabolite of irinotecan, via a unique hydrolyzable linker that allows for SN-38 release intracellularly and in the tumor microenvironment (bystander effect). Preclinical studies have shown a great range of efficacy with SG in mice bearing tumors with low, moderate, and high Trop-2 expression levels. We report subgroup analyses by Trop-2 expression from ASCENT, a randomized, phase 3 confirmatory study of SG versus standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Methods: In the global, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455), 529 patients with mTNBC refractory to or relapsing after at least 2 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) or single-agent treatment of physician’s choice (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) measured by central independent review per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1, duration of response, overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included biomarker assessments, including Trop-2 and BRCA1/2. Trop-2 expression was assessed using a validated immunohistochemistry assay. Results: Subgroup analyses by biomarker expression including Trop-2 and BRCA1/2 were performed, and outcomes by PFS, OS, ORR, and safety results will be reported. Conclusions: These analyses will provide further insights into the relationship of Trop-2 expression and the activity of SG in previously treated patients with mTNBC. Citation Format: Sara A. Hurvitz, Sara M. Tolaney, Kevin Punie, Delphine Loirat, Mafalda Oliveira, Kevin Kalinsky, Amelia Zelnak, Philippe Aftimos, Florence Dalenc, Sagar Sardesai, Erika Hamiltion, Priyanka Sharma, Sabela Recalde, Eva Ciruelos Gil, Tiffany Traina, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Javier Cortés, Michaela Tsai, Linda Vahdat, Véronique Diéras, Lisa Carey, Hope S. Rugo, David M. Goldenberg, Quan Hong, Martin Olivo, Loretta M. Itri, Aditya Bardia. Biomarker evaluation in the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-06.

Introduction: The immunomodulatory effects of dexamethasone and prednisone have been a staple of chemotherapy regimens since Mustargen, Oncovin, procarbazine, prednisone (MOPP) was used to treat lymphomas in 1963. Since then steroids have become ubiquitous in chemotherapy and were transitioned to an anti-nausea medication in solid tumor therapies and now anti-inflammatory therapies for common side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. While some modern immunomodulator therapies like rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil work through specific mechanisms, steroids have a much more non-specific effect working through a wide variety of pathways. Traditionally, chemotherapies such as paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide have been thought to induce cell death purely through cell-autonomous mechanisms such as DNA damage or interference with accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis. More recently, the strong correlation between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and pathological complete response (pCR) to chemotherapy has been demonstrated. We hypothesized that dexamethasone use may adversely affect the efficacy of chemotherapy due to down-regulation of TILs. Therefore, we investigated the effects of dexamethasone exposure levels on response rates to neoadjuvant therapy of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. We evaluated TNBC due to its high sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents in the neoadjuvant setting and because pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an indicator of better long-term outcomes in TNBC patients. Dexamethasone use as an anti-emetic in the neo-adjuvant setting is highly variable, often being substituted for with olanzapine. Methods: All patients with TNBC who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) between January 1st, 2012 and November 31st, 2018 at The James Comprehensive Cancer Center at The Ohio State University were included in this retrospective study, which totaled 174 patients. We omitted patients who received carboplatin with the paclitaxel, or received other experimental therapies during the neoadjuvant period. The primary exposure was dexamethasone dose by chemotherapy cycle, and the primary outcome was pCR. We used logistic regression to perform an intent-to-treat analysis, and defined P Results: We have found that there is no statistical or apparent difference in pCR by average dexamethasone dose per neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycle (P = 0.51), including when adjusting for diabetes status, metformin prescription and age (P=0.85). We found that there was sufficient variation in dexamethasone dose per cycle with the main mass of observations between 10 and 60 mg/cycle. Conclusions: We did not detect a difference in dexamethasone dose per neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycle between patients who did or did not achieve pCR. Thus, based on this retrospective analysis, the use of dexamethasone as an anti-emetic for triple negative breast cancer may not be harmful or beneficial in terms of the pathologic response to chemotherapy. This suggests that its use as an agent to mitigate side effects from chemotherapy is reasonable. Citation Format: Daniel Goldstein, Mahmoud Kassem, Dionisia Quiroga, Abdul Miah, Craig Vargo, Namrata Vilas Shinde, Michael Berger, Nicole Williams, Daniel Stover, Sagar Sardesai, Maryam Lustberg, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Gary Tozbikian, Patrick Schnell, Mathew Cherian. Immunomodulation with dexamethasone in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS13-46.

BackgroundConcurrent germline (g) pathogenic variants related to hereditary breast cancer represent a rare occurrence. While double heterozygosity in gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 has been reported in the past, herein we describe the first case of three known concurrent pathogenic variants identified in a family with a strong history of breast cancer.Case presentationThe proband is a 55-year-old female diagnosed with synchronous bilateral breast cancers. She underwent a multi-gene panel testing indicating the presence of 3 concurrent heterozygous germline deleterious variants inBRCA1(c.181T > G), BRCA2 (c.4398_4402delACATT), and CHEK2 (1100delC). The patient’s two daughters (34 and 29 years-old) were found to be transheterozygous for inherited pathogenic variants in BRCA1(c.181T > G)and CHEK2(1100delC)genes.ConclusionThe cancer risk and phenotypic manifestations associated with transheterozygous or multiple concurrent deleterious germline variants in hereditary breast cancer requires further investigation. A personalized approach to counseling, screening, and risk reduction should be undertaken for these individuals.

Survivors of advanced breast cancer (ABC), also known as metavivors, are often left with fewer treatment options in the landscape of a cure culture. Metavivors have unique psychosocial and physical needs distinct from patients with early-stage breast cancer. This analysis delves into side effects commonly experienced by patients with ABC, such as fatigue, anxiety, and cardiotoxicity; how these side effects impact caregiver support, financial toxicity, emotional strain, and spiritual and emotional distress; as well as current strategies for mitigation, including nutrition, exercise, and participation in clinical research. Overall, this analysis is a mandate for additional research to explore novel treatments and implement strategies to maintain and improve patients’ quality of life.

Simple Summary Obesity is a rising health epidemic in breast cancer survivors and associated with multiple negative health sequalae and increased mortality. Delay Discounting (DD) is a behavioral economic measure of an individual's valuation of future outcomes. While higher DD correlates with obesity in the general adult population, valuation of the future may impact cancer survivors differently due to their unique experiences. We assessed cross-sectional associations between DD, BMI, and healthy lifestyle behaviors in an exploratory analysis of 89 women with hormone receptor positive non-metastatic breast cancer. We found higher DD to be associated with obesity and decreased frequency of vegetable consumption. Future studies should investigate DD as a therapeutic target for novel behavioral interventions in breast cancer survivors affected by obesity. This may improve valuation of the future, increase healthy lifestyle behaviors, and facilitate weight loss to promote overall health and longevity in this population. Obesity in breast cancer (BC) survivors is associated with increased mortality. Delay discounting (DD) is a behavioral economic measure of how individuals value future outcomes. Higher DD correlates with obesity in the general population. Valuation of the future may be associated with obesity differently in cancer survivors. This study evaluated the relationship between DD and obesity in BC survivors. We report an exploratory analysis assessing cross-sectional associations between DD, BMI, and lifestyle behaviors (vegetable and fruit consumption, exercise) related to obesity in 89 women with hormone receptor positive non-metastatic BC. Multivariate linear regression analysis examined demographic and lifestyle behavior variables associated with both BMI and DD. Greater willingness to wait for larger, delayed rewards (lower DD) was significantly associated with lower BMI (standardized beta = -0.32; p < 0.01), independent of age, race, income, time since diagnosis, and menopausal status. There was no significant association between DD and fruit consumption or exercise frequency. Vegetable consumption was significantly associated with lower DD (standardized beta = 0.24; p < 0.05). Higher DD is associated with obesity and decreased frequency of vegetable consumption in BC survivors. Future studies should investigate DD as a therapeutic target for behavioral interventions to facilitate weight loss and promote longevity in this population. Center for Health Behaviors Research, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute; Carilion Clinic Published version This work was supported by a pilot feasibility grant from the Center for Health Behaviors Research, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute and Carilion Clinic to foster interdisciplinary collaborations in the study of health behaviors.

Objective The primary objective of this study was to delineate differences in management, overall and distant disease-free survival in males diagnosed with breast cancer and treated at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center as compared to comprehensively matched female subjects. Secondary objectives included assessment of clinical and histopathologic features and recurrence score, as measured by Oncotype DX and the modified Magee equation #2. Materials and methods This single institution retrospective study compared male and comprehensively matched female patients (1:2) with stage I-III breast cancer between 1994 and 2014. Recurrence risk was estimated using a modified Magee equation. Overall survival and distant disease-free survival were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank methods. Results Forty-five male breast cancer patients were included (stage I: 26.7%; stage II: 53.3%; stage III: 20.0%; hormone receptor positive: 97.8%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative: 84.4%) with a median age of 63.8 (43.0-79.4) years at diagnosis. Intermediate and low recurrence scores were most common in male and female patients respectively; mean score was similar between groups (20.3 vs. 19.8). The proportion of male breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and post-mastectomy radiation was lower compared to female patients (42.2% vs. 65.3%, p=0.013; 22.7% vs. 44.4%, p=0.030, respectively). Overall survival and distant disease-free survival between male and female patients were similar. Conclusion Male breast cancer patient outcomes were similar compared to well-matched female patients suggesting that breast cancer specific factors are more prognostic than gender.

The goal of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is palliation of symptoms while minimizing treatment-related toxicities. It remains unclear whether use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to maintain relative dose intensity of chemotherapy for MBC is associated with improved clinical outcomes. The medical records of MBC patients treated with chemotherapy in 1st–3rd-line settings between May 2010 and April 2014 were reviewed. Time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients who received G-CSF and those who did not. Antibiotic use, total clinic visits, and pre- and post-treatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status were also compared between the groups. Of the 169 patients included, 55 (32.5%) received > 1 G-CSF dose and 114 (67.5%) did not receive any G-CSF. The median TTP was similar between the two groups (5.0 months (95% CI 3.4–7.1) vs. 5.2 months (95% CI 4.8–6.2) respectively; p = 0.998). The median PFS (p = 0.955; 5.0 months (95% CI 3.4–5.9) vs. 5.2 months (95% CI 4.7–6.0), respectively) and OS (14.6 (95% CI 9.0–26.6) vs. 18.5 months (95% CI 15.2–22.0) in G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups, respectively; p = 0.628) were also similar between groups. No significant between-group differences were noted in rate of decline in ECOG performance status, antibiotic use, and number of clinic visits and hospitalizations. This retrospective analysis did not find any evidence that the use of G-CSF to maintain chemotherapy dose intensity for the treatment of MBC improves TTP, PFS, and OS or results in improved ECOG performance status compared with lack of G-CSF use in patients with MBC treated in 1st to 3rd-line settings.

Background Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is a complication of advanced malignancies wherein metastatic disease invades the meninges of the central nervous system via contiguous spread from bone or brain metastases or hematogenous spread from systemic disease. Breast cancer is the most common solid tumor etiology of LMC. Approximately 5% of patients (pts) with breast cancer develop LMC. LMC has a median survival of 4 weeks when untreated and 8-16 weeks with treatment. The diagnosis of LMC remains challenging with only 60% of pts having cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) positive for malignant cells. There is no generally accepted standard of care for treatment of LMC but it may involve intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy, whole brain or spinal radiotherapy, or a combination of modalities. We aimed to assess detection and treatment strategies of LMC in pts with breast cancer treated at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-James (OSUCCC-James) to better characterize the disease and guide clinical care. Methods An IRB-approved single-institution retrospective protocol was developed. Medical records of 469 pts who had undergone a procedure related to LMC diagnosis or treatment were identified and reviewed to determine study eligibility. Comprehensive data was obtained through information warehouse and chart review was performed for the eligible 69 pts with breast cancer diagnosed with LMC and treated at the OSUCCC-James between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from LMC diagnosis to death or last known follow-up, and was generated using Kaplan Meier methods. Comparisons in OS between groups were analyzed using Log-rank tests. Results Sixty-nine female pts were included in the analysis with the following characteristics: median age 55.7 years (range: 48-60.6 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 (86%; N=59), and Caucasian (78%; N=54). They had the following subtypes hormone receptor positive (HR +), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) negative (61%, N=42), triple negative (25%, N=17) and HER2 positive (10%, N=7). The most common sites of metastases included bone (42%), brain (28%), and lung (12%). The median time between the diagnosis of first metastasis and LMC was 0.9 years (range: 0-3.2 years). Of the 40 (58%) pts who underwent lumbar puncture, 21 (52%) pts had positive CSF cytology. Sixty-eight pts (99%) had MRI findings suggestive of LMC. The most common treatment modalities were systemic chemotherapy (N=14, 41%), radiotherapy (N=12, 35%), and intrathecal chemotherapy (N=14, 35%). Fifty-six pts (81%) had a change in systemic chemotherapy agent after diagnosis. The median OS of all pts was 2.4 months (95% confidence interval: 1.2-4.4). Pts with ER+/PR+/HER2- had a better OS (4.4 months, 95%CI 1.5, 6.1)) compared to those with HER2+ (1.3 months, 95%CI 0.2, 1.9) or ER-/PR-/HER2- (0.6 months, 95%CI 0.0, 15.8) subtypes (p-value=0.004). Pts with negative CSF cytology had a greater OS compared to those with positive CSF cytology (9.8 vs. 0.7 months, p=0.026) and pts who had a change in systemic treatment had a greater OS compared with patients who had no new treatment (2.5 months vs. 1.2 months, p =0.039). No significant difference was seen in OS between ECOG performance status groups. Conclusions LMC is a relatively rare yet devastating complication of breast cancer. Based on our institutional experience, LMC remains a clinical challenge and is associated with poor OS. Pts with triple negative and HER2 positive disease and those with high disease burden fare worse. Pts who had change in systemic therapy fare better. Dedicated clinical trials are urgently needed to improve outcomes. Citation Format: Hannah Rinehardt, Nicole Williams, Evan Morgan, Mahmooud Kassem, Marilly Palettas, Abdul Miah, Iyad Alnahhas, Pilar Guillermo Prieto Eibl, Anupama Suresh, Vinay Puduvalli, Pierre Giglio, Maryam Lustberg, Robert Wesolowski, Sagar Sardesai, Daniel Stover, Jeffrey VanDeusen, Jose Bazan, Bhuvaneswari Ramswamy, Anne Noonan. Assessment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis management and outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer from 2005 to 2015: A single institution experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-20-07.

Background: Many individuals diagnosed with MBC and their loved ones struggle to find tailored disease specific resources and support (Mayer 2010). Due to a variety of constraints, oncologists are often challenged to adequately address MBC patients’ needs and concerns within the space of a standard medical visit. Managing expectations and emotions, as well as providing education on the complexities of the MBC journey, is daunting. Moreover, survivorship care to date has not addressed the unique needs of the rapidly growing population of individuals living with MBC. The Living Well with Advanced Breast Cancer Clinic (LWABC) was created to address these gaps in care and to offer comprehensive and personalized consultations for MBC patients. Methods: MBC-specific support services are provided in one multidisciplinary setting, providing a comprehensive experience that incorporates expert medical oncology and symptom education, integrative medicine, palliative medicine, dietetics, and a personalized check out experience with LWABC nurses. MBC patients are referred by their primary medical oncologists for a one-time visit to this clinic. Second opinions are not provided in LWABC; the visit is strictly focused on education for the patient and their caregivers. Each patient receives multidisciplinary one-on-one education from a medical oncologist using audio-visual aides, mind-body interaction by an integrative medicine physician, personalized dietary recommendations by an experienced dietician, and an introduction to the role of palliative care in improving quality of life while living with cancer. Services also include personalized care planning for supportive care, future trials, and referrals for other resources during their 2.5 hour visit. Results: Between October 2017-February 2019, 73 patients were scheduled twice a month in the half day LWABC clinic; 44 completed consultations. All patients had MBC with all subtypes represented: ER+PR+HER2- (28, 38%), HER2+ (6, 8%) and ER-PR-HER2- (6, 8%). Median age was 60 years (range 36-75). Median time from time of MBC diagnosis to clinic visit was 2 years (range 1-7 years). Referrals placed at the completion of the visit included: social work (5, 11%), psychosocial oncology (9, 20%), physical therapy (12, 27%), occupational therapy (4, 9%), and palliative medicine (3, 6%). Of the 28 patients (63%) who completed satisfaction surveys regarding their experience at the LWABC, 14 (63%) reported a 5/5 experience in every section reviewed. On average, overall experience was evaluated as a 4.82/5 [SD 0.42]. Comments from participants included: “I feel less fearful and more empowered. Knowledge is power. I am now armed with accurate and useful information and am less uncertain”; “I appreciated the relaxed setting that encouraged conversation. I may have received brochures in the past regarding different options but this setting changes how receptive I am to different treatments.” Many patients reported wanting additional follow up visits in the future. Barriers included provider availability, financial reimbursement, and time for patient travel/additional medical appointments. Conclusion: The LWABC consultative model is an innovative adjunct to the traditional medical oncology visit and provides critically needed education and exposure of MBC patients to supportive care services within a relaxed and intimate setting while screening for unmet needs. Feasibility and satisfaction with this model of care was high; patients felt empowered by the knowledge delivered during the sessions. Additional expansion opportunities, including an introduction to physical therapy and psychosocial oncology, are planned. To our knowledge, this is a unique and first-of a kind resource offered to patients with MBC. Citation Format: Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Raquel R Reinbolt, Heidi Basinger, Lindsey Radcliff, Brittany Unthank, Kathy Hauck, Kelly Hoffman, Neil A. Borja, Sandra Pedraza, Erin E. Holley, Lanny O. Ntukidem, Mathew Cherian, Anne Noonan, Sagar Sardesai, Daniel G Stover, Jeffrey VanDeusen, Nicole Williams, Robert Wesolowski, Maryam B. Lustberg. Living well with advanced breast cancer: A unique multidisciplinary clinic designed to empower and educate patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-06.

Background Additional use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. However, neutropenia is a common reason for dose reductions, leading to concerns about palbociclib efficacy at lower doses. A safety analysis confirmed no PFS differences between palbociclib doses in the second-line setting, but to our knowledge, this has not been evaluated for first-line treatment. Patients and Methods In this retrospective, single-center cohort study we evaluated real-world use of first-line palbociclib with aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment in HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients who received treatment between February 2015 and July 2017. The primary objective was to determine PFS of treatment with palbociclib and an AI in a real-world first-line setting. Secondary objectives included determining the PFS for patients treated with palbociclib on the basis of final doses, time to first dose reduction, time to treatment failure (TTF), and safety. Results Seventy patients were included in the final analysis. Median PFS was 26.4 months. No significant differences in PFS were observed on the basis of final doses of palbociclib (P = .77). Time to first dose reduction was 2.3 months. Median TTF was 26.1 months. Dose delays, reductions, and Grade 3/4 neutropenia were common (63%, n = 44; 57%, n = 40; and 62%, n = 43, respectively). Conclusion Real-world first-line palbociclib treatment produced outcomes similar to those in PALOMA-2 (Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer) (median PFS 26.4 months vs. 24.8 months) despite more dose reductions (57%, n = 40 vs. 36%, n = 160) and shorter time to first dose reduction (2.3 vs. 3.0 months). No significant differences in PFS were observed for the varying palbociclib doses. Palbociclib dose reductions might not significantly affect PFS in the first-line setting.

Purpose Capecitabine is widely used as a single agent on a 21-day cycle in the management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Our primary objective was to compare the standard dosing of capecitabine (Arm A: days 1–14 on 21-day cycle) to biweekly dosing (Arm B: days 1–7 and 15–21 on 28-day cycle) using retrospective data analysis. Methods 166 patients with MBC treated with single agent capecitabine at The Ohio State University from 2002 to 2014 were considered eligible. Median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. KM curves were compared using log-rank tests with Holm’s correction for multiplicity. Results Patients were grouped by dose schedule into one of three arms: Arm A (21-day cycle; capecitabine given at 1000 mg/m2 orally, twice daily on days 1–14 of 21-day cycle); Arm B (28-day cycle; capecitabine given at 1000 mg/m2 orally, twice daily on days 1–7 and 15–21 of 28-day cycle); and Arm C (changeover regimen where patients started on the 21-day cycle, but changed to a 28-day cycle for tolerability). No difference was found in TTF or OS for patients with MBC between those who received capecitabine on either standard dosing (Arm A) and those on a biweekly cycle (Arm B or C). Overall, 41% of patients required dose reduction. Conclusions Our single institution experience showed that alternate dosing of capecitabine (biweekly, 28-day cycle) may be a reasonable alternative to standard 21-day cycle with similar efficacy and fewer dose reductions.

PURPOSE: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used in cancer patients to manage treatment-related gastrointestinal symptoms and to prevent damage to the gastric mucosal lining during treatment. However, PPI use may contribute to cognitive problems. To compare PPI-users and non-users, breast cancer survivors reported cognitive problems in three studies. METHODS: In Study 1, breast cancer survivors (N=209; n=173 non-users, n=36 PPI-users; stages 0-IIIC) rated their cognitive function on the Kohli scale prior to cancer treatment, as well as one and two years later. In Study 2, women (N=200; n=169 non-users, n=31 PPI-users, stages 0-IIIa, M=11 months post-treatment) rated their cognitive function on the Kohli scale and BCPT checklist at three visits over a six-month period. In Study 3, participants (N=142; n=121 non-users, n=21 PPI-users; stages I-IIIa, M=4 years post-treatment) rated their cognitive function on the Kohli scale, BCPT checklist, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy cognitive scale (FACT-cog). RESULTS: In Study 1, PPI-users reported more severe concentration problems (p=0.039) but not memory problems (p=0.17) than non-users. In Study 2, PPI-users reported more severe concentration problems (p=0.022) than non-users, but not memory problems or symptoms on the BCPT (ps=0.11). Study 3’s PPI-users reported more severe memory problems (p=0.002), poorer overall cognitive function (p=0.006), lower quality of life related to cognitive problems (p=0.005), greater perceived cognitive impairment (p=0.013), and poorer cognitive abilities (p=0.046), but not more severe concentration problems (p=0.16), compared to non-users. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: PPI use may impair breast cancer survivors’ memory, concentration, and quality of life.

Purpose Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody–drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38 via a proprietary hydrolyzable linker. In the ASCENT study, SG improved survival versus single-agent treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in pre-treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Hormone/HER2 receptor changes are common, particularly at relapse/metastasis. This subanalysis assessed outcomes in patients who did/did not have TNBC at initial diagnosis, before enrollment. Methods TNBC diagnosis was only required at study entry. Patients with mTNBC refractory/relapsing after ≥ 2 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to receive SG or TPC. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients without brain metastases. Results Overall, 70/235 (30%) and 76/233 (33%) patients who received SG and TPC, respectively, did not have TNBC at initial diagnosis. Clinical benefit with SG versus TPC was observed in this subset. Median PFS was 4.6 versus 2.3 months (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.32–0.72), median overall survival was 12.4 versus 6.7 months (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.30–0.64), and objective response rate (ORR) was 31% versus 4%; those who also received prior CDK4/6 inhibitors had ORRs of 21% versus 5%. Efficacy and safety for patients with TNBC at initial diagnosis were generally similar to those who did not present with TNBC at initial diagnosis. Conclusion Patients without TNBC at initial diagnosis had improved clinical outcomes and a manageable safety profile with SG, supporting SG as a treatment option for mTNBC regardless of subtype at initial diagnosis. Subtype reassessment in advanced breast cancer allows for optimal treatment. Clinical trial registration number NCT02574455, registered October 12, 2015.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) in premenopausal hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer (BC) improves survival. Adherence to adjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa) remains a challenge and is associated with toxicities and inconvenient parenteral administration. The goal of this study was to describe real-world adherence patterns and patient preferences surrounding adjuvant GnRHa. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of premenopausal women with non-metastatic HR positive BC from January 2000 to December 2017; participants received adjuvant monthly goserelin or leuprolide at The Ohio State University. Data collected included demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and OFS adherence/side effects. We defined non-adherence as discontinuation of GnRHa within 3 years for a reason other than switching to an alternate OFS, delay > 7 days from a dose, or a missed dose. Chi-square tests assessed associations between clinical characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 325 patients met eligibility. Of these, 119 (37%) patients were non-adherent to GnRHa; 137 (42%) underwent elective bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy after initial GnRHa. Those opting for surgery reported significantly more hot flashes (74% vs 48%, p < 0.001), arthralgias (46% vs 30%, p = 0.003), and vaginal dryness (37% vs 21%, p = 0.001) compared with patients remaining on GnRHa. CONCLUSION: Non-adherence to adjuvant GnRHa occurred in over a third of patients and almost half the patients initiating GnRHa underwent subsequent surgical ablation. These high frequencies highlight real-world patterns of OFS. Additionally, treatment toxicities may impact personal preference of OFS modality. Personalized practices to target predictors of adjuvant GnRHa non-adherence are critical to optimize symptoms, adherence, and survivorship.

Background: The pivotal phase III ASCENT trial demonstrated improved survival outcomes associated with sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an anti-trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (anti-Trop-2) antibody-drug conjugate linked with the topoisomerase-inhibitor SN-38, over single-agent chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). This prespecified, exploratory biomarker analysis from the ASCENT trial evaluates the association between tumor Trop-2 expression and germline BRCA1/2 mutation status with clinical outcomes. Patients and methods: Patients with mTNBC refractory to or progressing after two or more prior chemotherapies, with one or more in the metastatic setting, were randomized to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenously days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Biopsy or surgical specimens were collected at study entry to determine Trop-2 expression level using a validated immunohistochemistry assay and histochemical scoring. Germline BRCA1/2 mutation status was collected at baseline. Results: Of 468 assessable patients, 290 had Trop-2 expression data [64% (n = 151 SG) versus 60% (n = 139 TPC)] and 292 had known BRCA1/2 mutation status [63% (n = 149 SG) versus 61% (n = 143 TPC)]. Median progression-free survival in SG- versus TPC-treated patients was 6.9, 5.6, and 2.7 months versus 2.5, 2.2, and 1.6 months for high, medium, and low Trop-2 expression, respectively. Median overall survival (14.2, 14.9, and 9.3 months versus 6.9, 6.9, and 7.6 months) and objective response rates (44%, 38%, and 22% versus 1%, 11%, and 6%) were numerically higher with SG versus TPC in patients with high, medium, and low Trop-2 expression, respectively. Efficacy outcomes were numerically higher with SG versus TPC in patients with and without germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Conclusions: SG benefits patients with previously treated mTNBC expressing high/medium Trop-2 compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy and regardless of germline BRCA1/2 mutation status. The small number of patients with low Trop-2 expression precludes definitive conclusions on the benefit of SG in this subgroup., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Alpelisib is a α-selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor approved for treatment of postmenopausal women, and men, with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2–), PIK3CA-mutated, advanced breast cancer (ABC). Hyperglycemia is a common, on-target adverse effect that impairs treatment efficacy and increases the rate of treatment delays, dose reductions, and discontinuation. Currently, there are no clear guidelines on how to manage hyperglycemia due to alpelisib when metformin is not effective. In this case series, we review 3 subjects with ABC that developed hyperglycemia during alpelisib-fulvestrant therapy and were successfully managed with dietary and pharmacologic interventions. These cases provide anecdotal evidence to support the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and very low carbohydrate diets to minimize hyperglycemia during alpelisib therapy.