Search

Detecting covert channels among legitimate traffic represents a severe challenge due to the high heterogeneity of networks. Therefore, we propose an effective covert channel detection method, based on the analysis of DNS network data passively extracted from a network monitoring system. The framework is based on a machine learning module and on the extraction of specific anomaly indicators able to describe the problem at hand. The contribution of this paper is two-fold: (i) the machine learning models encompass network profiles tailored to the network users, and not to the single query events, hence allowing for the creation of behavioral profiles and spotting possible deviations from the normal baseline; (ii) models are created in an unsupervised mode, thus allowing for the identification of zero-days attacks and avoiding the requirement of signatures or heuristics for new variants. The proposed solution has been evaluated over a 15-day-long experimental session with the injection of traffic that covers the most relevant exfiltration and tunneling attacks: all the malicious variants were detected, while producing a low false-positive rate during the same period., Comment: This is a pre-print of an article published in the proceedings of 14th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software (MALWARE), 2019

In the last decade, the use of fast flux technique has become established as a common practice to organise botnets in Fast Flux Service Networks (FFSNs), which are platforms able to sustain illegal online services with very high availability. In this paper, we report on an effective fast flux detection algorithm based on the passive analysis of the Domain Name System (DNS) traffic of a corporate network. The proposed method is based on the near-real-time identification of different metrics that measure a wide range of fast flux key features; the metrics are combined via a simple but effective mathematical and data mining approach. The proposed solution has been evaluated in a one-month experiment over an enterprise network, with the injection of pcaps associated with different malware campaigns, that leverage FFSNs and cover a wide variety of attack scenarios. An in-depth analysis of a list of fast flux domains confirmed the reliability of the metrics used in the proposed algorithm and allowed for the identification of many IPs that turned out to be part of two notorious FFSNs, namely Dark Cloud and SandiFlux, to the description of which we therefore contribute. All the fast flux domains were detected with a very low false positive rate; a comparison of performance indicators with previous works show a remarkable improvement., Comment: This is a pre-print of an article published in the proceedings of 21st International Conference, ISC 2018, Guildford, UK, September 9-12, 2018. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99136-8_25