Search

Durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Durva/Treme) combined immunotherapy is the first-line therapy recommended for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since sequential therapy is more effective in improving prognosis, tumor markers have been used as predictive biomarkers for response to systemic therapy. This study aimed to investigate the predictive ability of objective response (OR) by tumor markers for Durva/Treme therapy against HCC. In this multicenter study, 110 patients with HCC who received Durva/Treme therapy were retrospectively enrolled. The OR rate was 15.5%. To aid early decision-making regarding OR, we evaluated the predictors contributing to OR in two steps: before (first step) and 4 weeks after (second step) treatment induction. Changes in tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin [DCP]) from baseline to 4 weeks after treatment (ΔAFP/ΔDCP) were included as the input factors. In the first step, multivariable analysis identified only the baseline AFP level (odds ratio 3.497, p = 0.029) as a predictor of OR. Patients with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL had a significantly higher OR rate than those with < 400 ng/mL (28.2 vs. 8.5%, p = 0.011), and there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. When AFP/DCP response was defined as a ≥10% reduction from baseline, multivariable analysis showed that AFP response (odds ratio 6.023, p = 0.042) and DCP response (odds ratio 11.657, p = 0.006) were both independent predictors of OR in the second step. The PFS of patients with AFP or DCP response was significantly longer than that of patients without AFP or DCP response. The study demonstrated that the use of AFP and DCP can predict the OR of patients with HCC receiving Durva/Treme therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Lenvatinib and sorafenib are key therapeutic agents for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are no useful biomarkers for selecting molecular-targeted agents (MTAs). Skeletal muscle volume is associated with the clinical outcomes in these patients. We investigated the effects of lenvatinib and sorafenib on the skeletal muscles of patients with HCC. Methods: We evaluated the impact of skeletal muscle changes over a 3-month period for each MTA (n = 117; lenvatinib/sorafenib, 45/72). The skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was measured at the third lumbar vertebra. Furthermore, we evaluated the direct effect of each MTA on primary human skeletal muscle cells by estimating muscle protein synthesis using western blot analysis. Results: The median change in SMI was −0.7% (p = 0.959) and −5.9% (p < 0.001) for the lenvatinib and sorafenib groups, respectively. Sorafenib had a greater effect on skeletal muscle loss than lenvatinib (p < 0.001). Additionally, SMI significantly decreased in the sorafenib group regardless of initial skeletal muscle volume (p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed in the lenvatinib group. Sorafenib therapy (odds ratio [OR], 2.98; p = 0.023) and non-muscle depletion (OR, 3.31; p = 0.009) were associated with a decreased SMI. In vitro analysis showed that sorafenib negatively affected muscle synthesis compared to lenvatinib. Conclusions: Sorafenib may have a more negative effect on skeletal muscle than lenvatinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients with hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (viral HCC) are decreasing as hepatitis control improves, but those with non-viral-related HCC (non-viral HCC) are increasing in Japan. No established surveillance system exists for patients with non-viral HCC, so they are often diagnosed at an advanced stage. To address this, we performed this study. Methods: We collected serum samples from 516 participants (154 healthy subjects, 93 chronic liver disease [CLD] patients without HCC, and 269 HCC patients). Participants were divided into a control group comprising healthy subjects and patients with CLD and an HCC group. We evaluated serum methylated HOXA1 (m-HOXA1) copy numbers using modified combined restriction digital PCR (CORD) assay (1-step CORD assay). We assessed diagnostic performance of m-HOXA1 compared to HCC tumor markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) and created a novel index to improve HCC prediction. Results: Serum m-HOXA1 level was significantly higher in each HCC stage group versus the control group. Its sensitivity was 69.1% and specificity was 78.5% for diagnosing HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) of m-HOXA1 was superior to that of AFP and equal to that of DCP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed independent contributions of m-HOXA1, DCP, and AFP, in that order of strength, to diagnose HCC after adjustment for age and sex. We designated the predictive probability of HCC based on the regression model as the ASDAm-H1 (Age, Sex, DCP, AFP, and m-HOXA1) index. Its diagnostic accuracy was 0.96 by AUC with a sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 93.9%. Sensitivity was identical for viral and non-viral HCCs. When limited to early-stage HCC, sensitivity of the ASDAm-H1 index was 76.3%. Conclusions: We showed distinguished performance of the ASDAm-H1 index to detect viral and non-viral HCC, even at an early stage. This index might have potential as a non-viral HCC surveillance system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for unresectable intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but recurrence after TACE is common. The present phase 2, prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial, the TACTICS-L trial, investigated the efficacy and safety of TACE plus lenvatinib (LEN), a drug that more strongly promotes vascular normalization and has a better objective response rate (ORR) than sorafenib (jRCTs031180074). Methods: Participants were patients with HCC who had not previously received systemic therapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, or immunotherapy and who were ineligible for resection or percutaneous ablation therapy. LEN was to be administered 14–21 days before the first TACE, stopped 2 days before TACE, and resumed 3 days after TACE. Key inclusion criteria were unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh A liver function, 0–2 prior TACE sessions, tumor size ≤10 cm, number of tumors ≤10, and ECOG performance status 0–1. Key exclusion criteria were vascular invasion and extrahepatic spread. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECICL, and secondary endpoints were time to untreatable progression, ORR, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A total of 62 HCC patients were enrolled in this trial. The median age was 72 years, 77.4% of patients were men, and 95.2% had PS 0. The primary endpoint of median PFS was 28.0 months (90% confidence interval [CI] 25.1–31.0) after a minimum 24 months of follow-up. The secondary endpoint of median OS was not reached (90% CI 35.5 months–NR). LEN-TACE achieved a high response rate and high complete response (CR) rate (4 weeks after the first TACE: ORR 79.0%, CR rate 53.2%; best response: ORR 88.7%, CR rate 67.7%) by RECICL. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed that the characteristics of responders/nonresponders (ORR and CR rate) were similar and that LEN-TACE would be effective in all subgroups, including the population in whom TACE alone would be less likely to be curative (e.g., patients with the non-simple nodular type or a high tumor burden). The relative dose intensity of LEN before the first TACE was important for achieving higher CR rate/ORR by LEN-TACE. No new safety concerns were observed. Conclusion: The results of this trial provide encouraging evidence, supporting the efficacy and favorable safety profile of LEN-TACE in patients who are ineligible for locoregional therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of identifying candidates of portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) from general portal hypertension patients based on chest computed tomography (CT) results. Methods: One hundred and thirty patients with portal hypertension who had undergone interventional radiology therapies at our hospital between August 2011 and July 2021 were included, and preoperative clinical data were collected. Suspicious PoPH was defined as main pulmonary artery diameter (mPA‐D) ≥ 29 mm or the ratio of mPA‐D to ascending aorta diameter (mPA‐D/aAo‐D) ≥ 1.0, and probable PoPH as mPA‐D ≥ 33 mm based on the chest CT. Prevalence of suspicious and probable PoPH was evaluated, and the differences in clinical characteristics of each population were compared. Results: Overall, 29 (22.3%) and 5 (3.8%) patients were categorized as suspicious and probable PoPH, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed that female sex, higher shortest diameter of inferior vena cava, presence of portosystemic shunts ≥ 5 mm, and lower blood urea nitrogen levels were significantly associated with suspicious PoPH (p < 0.05). Multivariate analyses identified all four factors as significantly independent determinants of suspicious PoPH (p < 0.05). In addition, among the population of suspicious PoPH, there were significant differences in seven parameters, including total bilirubin levels and spleen volume between patients with and without probable PoPH (p < 0.05). However, no significant independent indicators of probable PoPH were found. Conclusions: CT‐based measurements of mPA‐D and mPA‐D/aAo‐D have the potential to screen patients with suspicious PoPH in clinical practice focused on portal hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) has been approved as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC), its outcomes in real-world clinical practice are unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dur/Tre treatment. This multicenter study was conducted between March 2023 and January 2024, and included 120 patients with u-HCC treated with Dur/Tre. Among the patients, 44 had no history of systemic treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), therapeutic response and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 15.8 and 53.3%, respectively. The median PFS was 3.9 months. The incidence rates of AEs of any grade and those grade 3 or higher were 83.3 and 36.7%, respectively. Liver injury was the most frequent AE of any grade and grade 3 or higher. Although there was no significant difference in ORR and PFS between the first and later line groups (ORR 15.8 vs. 15.7%, P=0.986; PFS 4.5 vs. 3.6 months, P=0.213), there was a significant difference in DCR between the two groups (65.8 vs. 45.9%, P=0.034). No significant differences were noted between the first- and later-line treatment groups regarding the incidence rate of AEs. Decision tree analysis revealed that poor liver function and advanced age were significant variables for discontinuation owing to AEs. In conclusion, Dur/Tre as first-line therapy had better disease control responses compared with later-line therapy; however, this regimen should be carefully administered to patients with deteriorating hepatic function or advanced age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]