Search

Manuela Thienel,1,&ast; Magda Haum,1,&ast; Sebastian Sadoni,2 Julia Novotny,1 Heidi L Estner,1 Stephanie Fichtner,1 Korbinian Lackermair1 1Department of Medicine I, Munich University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany; 2Department of Cardiac Surgery, Munich University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Korbinian Lackermair, Department of Medicine I, Munich University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany, Email Korbinian.lackermair@med.uni-muenchen.deBackground: The subcutaneous cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) has been shown to be a viable alternative to transvenous ICDs (TV-ICD) in all patients at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) but without pacing indication.Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of therapy with current S-ICD devices on quality of life (QoL) in comparison to patients with TV-ICD devices.Methods: In our single-centre study, 52 consecutive patients with S-ICD and 52 matched patients with TV-ICD were analysed. QoL has been assessed by a standardized questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L, modified). Additionally, clinical baseline and follow-up data were evaluated.Results: Two-thirds of the total study population reported restrictions in daily routine compared to their life before ICD implantation. A total of 27.7% of S-ICD patients stated to expect an improvement of QoL by deactivation or explantation of their defibrillator compared to only 6.4% of patients with TV-ICD (p=0.006), which was mainly caused by discomfort and pain from the S-ICD pocket (relevant discomfort and pain in 32.6% vs 11.5%; p< 0.01).Limitations: Main limitation of the study is that quality of life was assessed for one single time point only and time since implantation differed significantly between S-ICD and TV-ICD. Furthermore our collective is younger, and, due to the high proportion of patients without cardiomyopathy, the mean EF is better than usual ICD collective. The absence of heart failure in about the half of our patients might have relevant impact on our QoL analysis.Conclusion: A relevant proportion of S-ICD patients expects an improvement of QoL by explantation of the device. Of note, this impression was not driven by the fear of receiving shocks but mainly by discomfort and pain caused by the pulse generator.Keywords: subcutaneous cardioverter defibrillator, S-ICD, transvenous cardioverter defibrillator, quality of life

New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery is associated with increased rates of adverse events (including mortality and stroke). Its incidence after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is considered to be approximately 30%, and it is believed to be a transient condition. However, studies investigating POAF after CABG fail to provide appropriate data on incidence and arrhythmia patterns due to the use of intermittent rhythm detection strategies. These methods have a low sensitivity as compared with continuous monitoring. Subsequently, studies using these techniques most likely do not identify all patients with arrhythmia and do not adequately demonstrate the long-term incidence of arrhythmia, which in turn may affect its association with adverse events. The Characterization of Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Atrial Fibrillation Patterns (CABG-AF) study (German Clinical Trials Register Number: DRKS00018887) tests the hypothesis that the incidence of AF in the first 12 months after CABG is significantly underestimated. CABG-AF is an investigator-initiated multicenter, prospective, observational study in which 196 patients with no history of arrhythmia who underwent first-time CABG receive an insertable cardiac monitor for continuous postoperative rhythm monitoring. The primary end point of the study is any episode of AF within the first 12 months after surgery. Secondary end points include AF burden, AF density, and the ratio of silent to symptomatic AF episodes. End points will be investigated by automatic and patient-initiated data transfers from the implanted device, by telephone interview of patients, and by follow-up forms sent to patients by mail. The patients will be followed for a planned follow-up of 3 years. In conclusion, the CABG-AF study will provide information on the true incidence of AF after CABG and on the temporal patterns of the arrhythmia., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Anders Jeppsson discloses personal payments for advisory boards and/or presentations from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Werfen, LFB Biotechnologies, Boehringer-Ingelheim (Ingelheim, Germany), and Novo Nordisk that are unrelated to the present work. Sebastian Sadoni discloses having received payments for work as a proctor for Boston Scientific that are unrelated to the present work. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare. The graphical abstract and Figure 1 were created using Biorender.com., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) represents the diagnostic image modality of choice in several conditions. With an increasing number of patients requiring MRI for diagnostic purposes, the issue of safety in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) undergoing this imaging modality will play an ever more important role. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and device function following MRI in an unrestricted real-world cohort of patients with a wide array of cardiac devices., Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 1010 MRI studies conducted in adult patients (≥18 years) with an implanted CIED treated in the University Hospital of Munich (LMU) between July 2012 and March 2024. Patients with non-MR conditionally labeled leads, abandoned or epicardial leads, as well as lead fragments, were included for analysis., Results: Across a total of 1010 MRIs (920 total MR-conditional device generators) performed in patients with an implanted CIED, there were no deaths, reports of discomfort, palpitations, heating, or ventricular arrythmias in the 24 h following MRI. Only 2/1010 MRIs were followed by a reported atrial arrhythmia within 24 h, both in patients with an MR-conditional pacemaker (PM) device without an abandoned lead. No significant changes in device function following MRI from baseline were observed across all included CIEDs. Lastly, no instances of severe malfunction, such as generator failure, loss of capture, electrical reset, or inappropriate inhibition of pacing, were found in post-MRI interrogation reports across all MRI studies., Conclusions: Based on the analysis of 1010 MRIs undergone by patients with CIEDs, following standardized device interrogation, manufacturer-advised device programming, monitoring of vital function, and manufacturer-advised reprogramming, MRI can be performed safely and without adverse events or changes in device function.

Objectives: To analyze Heart Team decisions and outcomes following failure of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) prostheses. Methods: Patients undergoing re-operations following index SAVR (Redo-SAVR) and those undergoing valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) following SAVR were included in this study. Patients who underwent index SAVR and/or Redo-SAVR for endocarditis were excluded. Data are presented as medians and 25th-75th percentiles, or absolute numbers and percentages. Outcomes were analyzed in accordance to the VARC-3 criteria. Results: Between 01/2015 and 03/2021, 53 patients underwent Redo-SAVR, 103 patients ViV-TAVR. Mean EuroSCORE II was 5.7% (3.5-8.5) in the Redo-SAVR group and 9.2% (5.4-13.6) in the ViV group. In the Redo-SAVR group, 12 patients received aortic root enlargement (22.6%). Length of hospital and ICU stay was longer in the Redo-SAVR group ( p < 0.001; p < 0.001), PGmax and PGmean were lower in the Redo-SAVR group as compared to the ViV-TAVR group (18 mmHg (10-30) vs. 26 mmHg (19-38), p < 0.001) (9 mmHg (6-15) vs. 15 mmHg (9-21), p < 0.001). A higher rate of paravalvular leakage was seen in the ViV-TAVR group ( p = 0.013). VARC-3 Early Safety were comparable between the two populations ( p = 0.343). Survival at 1 year and 5 years was 82% and 36% in the ViV-TAVR cohort and 84% and 77% in the Redo-SAVR cohort. The variables were patient age (OR 1.061; [95% CI 1.020-1.104], p = 0.004), coronary heart disease (OR 2.648; [95% CI 1.160-6.048], p = 0.021), and chronic renal insufficiency (OR 2.711; [95% CI 1.160-6.048], p = 0.021) showed a significant correlation to ViV-TAVR. Conclusions: Heart Team decisions are crucial in the treatment of patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses and lead to a low mortality in both treatment paths thanks to patient-specific therapy planning. ViV-TAVR offers a treatment for elderly or intermediate-risk profile patients with comparable short-term mortality. However, this therapy is associated with increased pressure gradients and a high prevalence of paravalvular leakage. Redo-SAVR enables the surgical treatment of concomitant cardiac pathologies and allows anticipation for later VIV-TAVR by implanting the largest possible valve prostheses.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective and safe therapy for severe aortic stenosis. Rapid or fast pacing is required for implantation, which can be performed via a pre-existing cardiac implantable electric device (CIED). However, safety data on CIEDs for pacing in TAVR are missing., Objectives: The aim of this study was to elucidate procedural safety and feasibility of internal pacing with a CIED in TAVR., Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR with a CIED were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and complications according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria after TAVR were compared between both groups., Results: A total of 486 patients were included. Pacing was performed using a CIED in 150 patients and a transient pacemaker in 336 patients. No differences in technical success according to VARC-3 criteria or procedure duration occurred between the groups. The usage of transient pacers for pacing was associated with a significantly higher bleeding rate (bleeding type ≥2 according to VARC-3-criteria; 2.0% vs 13.1%; P < 0.01). Furthermore, impairment of the CIED appeared in 2.3% of patients after TAVR only in the group in which pacing was performed by a transient pacer, leading to surgical revision of the CIED in 1.3% of all patients when transient pacemakers were used., Conclusions: Internal pacing using a CIED is safe and feasible without differences of procedural time and technical success and might reduce bleeding rates. Furthermore, pacing using a CIED circumvents the risk of lead dislocation. Our data provide an urgent call for the use of a CIED for pacing during a TAVR procedure in general., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Drs Steffen, Deseive, and Lackermair have received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Residual and recurrent mitral regurgitation after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair are therapeutically challenging. In the present case report, we describe a simplified, transapical electrosurgical laceration and stabilization of clip procedure that represents an alternative and direct approach for electrosurgical laceration of mitral valve leaflets enabling transcatheter mitral valve replacement for recurrent mitral regurgitation after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair., Competing Interests: Dr Stolz has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Peterss has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, AstraZeneca, and CytoSorbents. Dr Hagl has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Köhler Chemie, and CytoSorbents. Dr Näbauer has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hausleiter has received research support and speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Concomitant moderate/severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is observed in 17-35% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and contributes to a worse prognosis. Studies analysing outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI with different MR aetiologies, including atrial functional MR (aFMR), are lacking., Aims: We aimed to analyse outcomes and changes in MR severity in patients with aFMR, ventricular functional (vFMR) and primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) following TAVI., Methods: We analysed all consecutive patients with at least moderate MR undergoing TAVI between January 2013 and December 2020 at the Munich University Hospital. Characterisation of MR aetiology was performed by detailed individual echocardiographic assessment. Three-year mortality, changes in MR severity and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at follow-up were assessed., Results: Out of 3,474 patients undergoing TAVI, 631 patients showed MR ≥2+ (172 with aFMR, 296 with vFMR, 163 with PMR). Procedural characteristics and endpoints were comparable between groups. The rate of MR improvement was 80.2% in aFMR patients, which was significantly higher compared to both other groups (vFMR: 69.4%; p=0.03; PMR: 40.8%; p<0.001). The estimated 3-year survival rates did not differ between aetiologies (p=0.57). However, MR persistence at follow-up was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.11; p=0.027), mainly driven by the PMR subgroup of patients. NYHA Class improved significantly in all groups. In patients with baseline MR ≥3+, the PMR aetiology was associated with the lowest MR improvement, the lowest survival rates and least symptomatic improvement., Conclusions: TAVI reduces MR severity and symptoms in patients with aFMR, vFMR and less-pronounced PMR. The presence of aFMR was associated with the greatest MR severity improvement.

Background: Implantable electronic cardiac devices (CIED) have emerged as an essential component in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure. Due to increased life expectancy, expanding indications and limited technical survival, an increasing number of revision procedures can be anticipated. Venous access site occlusion (VASO) is the main obstacle during revision surgery. In this retrospective study we evaluated the prevalence, predictive parameters and operative management of venous access site occlusion., Methods and Results: Between 01/2016 and 12/2020 304 patients underwent lead revision surgery of transvenous CIED in our department. Prevalence of VASO was 25.7% (n = 78), one patient was symptomatic. Independent predicting clinical parameters were male sex (2.86 (1.39-5.87), p < 0.01) and lead age (1.11 (1.05-1.18), p < 0.01)). Revision surgery despite VASO was successful in 97.4% (n = 76) without prolongation of the total surgery time or higher complication rates. Yet, lead extraction was possible in 92% of patients with VASO vs. 98.2% of patients without VASO (p 0.01)., Conclusion: VASO is a frequent condition in patients undergoing lead revision surgery, but successful revision is feasible in most cases without preceding lead extraction. However, the lower success rates of lead extractions may be prognostically relevant, especially for younger patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The data underlying this article will be shared anonymised on reasonable request to the corresponding author., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established, safe and effective therapy for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this study was to objectively quantify improvement of physical activity after TAVR, with consideration of different low-gradient AS subtypes., Methods and Results: All patients undergoing TAVR for severe AS were screened. Participants received a wearable activity tracker (Fitbit®) at hospital discharge following TAVR and 6 months thereafter. The difference of median daily steps was defined as surrogate outcome for physical activity. For analysis, patients were grouped into high-gradient (HG) AS (dPmean ≥40 mmHg), classical low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) AS (dPmean <40 mmHg, EF <50%), paradoxical LFLG-AS (dPmean <40 mmHg, EF ≥50%, SVi ≤35 ml/m2) and normal-flow low-gradient (NFLG) AS (dPmean <40 mmHg, EF ≥50%, SVi >35 ml/m2) according to mean transvalvular pressure gradient (dPmean), stroke volume index (SVi) and left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)., Results and Conclusions: The analysis is based on 230 patients. The median daily step count was 4409 [IQR 2581-7487] after hospital discharge and 5326 [IQR 3045-8668] 6 months thereafter. Median difference of daily steps was ∆529 [IQR -702-2152]). Patients with HG-AS and paradoxical LFLG-AS showed a significant improvement of daily steps (∆951 [IQR -378-2323], p <0.001 and (∆1392 [IQR -609-4444], p = 0.02, respectively). Patients with classical LFLG-AS showed no statistically relevant improvement of daily steps (∆192 [IQR -687-770], p = 0.79). Patients with NFLG-AS showed a numerical decline in daily steps without statistical significance (∆-300 [IQR -1334-1406], p = 0.67). This first prospective study of this sample size shows significant improvement of physical activity after TAVR with an objective and reproducible method. This was mainly driven by an improvement in patients with HG-AS and paradoxical LFLG-AS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JS received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca. MO received speaker honoraria and travel compensations from Abbott Medical, AstraZeneca, Abiomed, Bayer vital, BIOTRONIK, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CytoSorbents, Daiichi Sankyo Germany, Edwards Lifesciences Services, and Sedana Medical. JH received research support Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. DB received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular. SD received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The study objective was to characterize different groups of low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) and determine short-term outcomes and long-term mortality according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) endpoint definitions., Background: Characteristics and outcomes of patients with LFLG AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are poorly understood., Methods: All patients undergoing TAVI at our center between 2013 and 2019 were screened. Patients were divided into three groups according to mean pressure gradient (dPmean), ejection fraction (LVEF), and stroke volume index (SVi): high gradient (HG) AS (dPmean ≥ 40 mmHg), classical LFLG (cLFLG) AS (dPmean < 40 mmHg, LVEF < 50%), and paradoxical LFLG (pLFLG) AS (dPmean < 40 mmHg, LVEF ≥ 50%, SVi ≤ 35 ml/m 2 )., Results: We included 1776 patients (956 HG, 447 cLFLG, and 373 pLFLG patients). Most baseline characteristics differed significantly. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was highest in cLFLG, followed by pLFLG and HG patients (5.0, 3.9 and 3.0, respectively, p < 0.01). Compared to HG patients, odds ratios for the short-term VARC-3 composite endpoints, technical failure (cLFLG, 0.76 [95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.36], pLFLG, 1.37 [0.79-2.31]) and device failure (cLFLG, 1.06 [0.74-1.49], pLFLG, 0.97 [0.66-1.41]) were similar, without relevant differences within LFLG patients. NYHA classes improved equally in all groups. Compared to HG, LFLG patients had a higher 3-year all-cause mortality (STS score-adjusted hazard ratios, cLFLG 2.16 [1.77-2.64], pLFLG 1.53 [1.22-193]), as well as cardiovascular mortality (cLFLG, 2.88 [2.15-3.84], pLFLG, 2.08 [1.50-2.87])., Conclusions: While 3-year mortality remains high after TAVI in LFLG compared to HG patients, symptoms improve in all subsets after TAVI., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Large-bore arteriotomy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) requires percutaneous vascular closure devices, but real-world data comparing different closure strategies are limited., Aims: We sought to compare a dual ProGlide strategy vs a combination of one ProGlide and one FemoSeal for vascular closure after TAVI., Methods: We retrospectively analysed 874 propensity score-matched patients undergoing TAVI at the Munich University Hospital from August 2018 to October 2020. From August 2018 to August 2019, a dual ProGlide strategy was used for vascular closure. From October 2019 to October 2020, a combination of one ProGlide and one FemoSeal was used. The primary endpoint was defined as access-related major vascular complications or bleeding ≥Type 2 according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria., Results: Patients in the dual ProGlide group (n=437) had a higher incidence of the primary endpoint than patients treated with one ProGlide and one FemoSeal (n=437; 11.4% vs 3.0%; p<0.001). Furthermore, they had a higher rate of closure device failure (2.7% vs 0.9%; p=0.044) and more often required unplanned surgery or endovascular treatment (3.9% vs 0.9%; p=0.004). The incidence of death did not differ significantly between groups (3.4% vs 1.6%; p=0.08)., Conclusions: A combined ProGlide and FemoSeal strategy might have the potential to reduce access-related vascular complications following TAVI.

Objectives : As surgical experience with infective endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement is scarce, this study compared the perioperative and short-term outcomes of patients suffering from endocarditis following surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Methods : Between January 2013 and December 2020, 468 consecutive patients were admitted to our center for surgery for IE. Among them, 98 were operated on for endocarditis following surgical aortic valve replacement and 22 for endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Results : The median EuroSCORE II (52.1 (40.6-62.0) v/s 45.4 (32.6-58.1), p = 0.207) and STS-PROM (1.8 (1.6-2.1) v/s 1.9 (1.4-2.2), p = 0.622) were comparable. Endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement accounted for 13.7% of the aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis between 2013 and 2015; this increased to 26.9% in the years 2019 and 2020.Concomitant procedures were performed in 35 patients (29.2%). The operative mortality was 26.5% in the endocarditis following surgical aortic valve replacement group and 9.1% in the endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement group ( p = 0.098). Upon follow-up, survival at 6 months was found to be 98% in the group with endocarditis following surgical aortic valve replacement and 89% in the group with endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement ( p = 0.081). Conclusions : Patients suffering from endocarditis following surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement present with comparable risk profiles and can be surgically treated with comparable results. Surgery as a curative option should not be rejected even in this intermediate-risk cohort.

Despite the rapid increase in experience and technological improvement, the incidence of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the self-expandable CoreValve Evolut valve remains high. Recently, a cusp-overlap view (COP) implantation technique has been proposed for TAVR with self-expandable valves offering an improved visualization during valve expansion compared to the three-cusp view (TCV). This study aims to systematically analyze procedural outcomes of TAVR patients treated with the CoreValve Evolut valve using a COP compared to TCV in a high-volume center. The primary endpoint was technical success according the 2021 VARC-3 criteria. A total of 122 consecutive patients (61 pts. TCV: April 2019 to November 2020; 61 pts. COP: December 2020 to October 2021) that underwent TAVR with the CoreValve Evolut prosthesis were included in this analysis. Although there was no difference in the primary endpoint technical success between TCV and COP patients (93.4% vs. 90.2%, OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.16, 2.4, p = 0.51), we observed a significantly lower risk for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) among COP patients (TCV: 27.9% vs. COP: 13.1%, OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.15, 0.97, p = 0.047). Implantation of the CoreValve Evolut prosthesis using the COP might help to reduce the rate of PPI following TAVR.

Background and Objectives : Mitral stenosis with extensive mitral annular calcification (MAC) remains surgically challenging in respect to clinical outcome. Prolonged surgery time with imminent ventricular rupture and systolic anterior motion can be considered as a complex of causal factors. The aim of our alternative hybrid approach was to reduce the risk of annual rupture and paravalvular leaks and to avoid obstruction of the outflow tract. A review of the current literature was also carried out. Materials and Methods: Six female patients (mean age 76 ± 9 years) with severe mitral valve stenosis and severely calcified annulus underwent an open implantation of an Edwards Sapien 3 prosthesis on cardiopulmonary bypass. Our hybrid approach involved resection of the anterior mitral leaflet, placement of anchor sutures and the deployment of a balloon expanded prosthesis under visual control. Concomitant procedures were carried out in three patients. Results: The mean duration of cross-clamping was 95 ± 31 min and cardiopulmonary bypass was 137 ± 60 min. The perioperative TEE showed in three patients an inconspicuous, heart valve-typical gradient on all implanted prostheses and a clinically irrelevant paravalvular leakage occurred in the anterior annulus. In the left ventricular outflow tract, mild to moderately elevated gradients were recorded. No adverse cerebrovascular events and pacemaker implantations were observed. All but one patient survived to discharge. Survival at one year was 83.3%. Conclusion s : This "off label" implantation of the Edwards Sapien 3 prosthesis may be considered as a suitable bail-out approach for patients at high-risk for mitral valve surgery or deemed inoperable due to extensive MAC.