Search

Background: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a common source of chronic low back pain. Published cohorts have reported favorable outcomes after SIJ fusion. We report the 12-month follow-up from SIJ fusion of the so far largest single-center and single-surgeon group., Methods: Over 15,000 outpatients were evaluated for chronic low back and leg pain, of whom 3,477 underwent SIJ blocks. 541 patients were stringently selected to undergo SIJ fusion with triangular titanium implants (TTI). 483 patients had a follow-up of 12 months. Patients were seen every 3 months and completed visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ratings., Results: Mean age of all patients was 61 years, and the majority (65%) were women. 44% had undergone prior lumbar fusion and 10% had a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) in place at the time of SIJ surgery. 26% underwent non-simultaneous bilateral SI joint fusion. At 12 months, the proportion of patients with clinically important improvements in pain (≥ 2 points) was very high (100%). The proportion with substantial improvement (≥ 4 points) was 98%. Similarly, improvement in ODI was high, with nearly 99% having an improvement of ≥ 15 points by month 12. The proportions of patients with VAS ≤ 2 or ODI ≤ 15 was also high (92.8% and 48.9%)., Conclusions: In our clinical practice, SIJ fusion with TTI produces significant improvement in pain and disability. The most important factor for achieving these clinical results may be the very stringent multistep selection of patients for surgery, which is described in detail, as well as the highly standardized and streamlined surgical procedure and the particular postoperative management., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethical approval Reference number of study 2024 − 1019 with the Ethics Committee of the Bavarian State Chamber of Physicians: According to § 15 of the professional code of physicians of Bavaria retrospective reviews of anonymized patient data do not require ethical approval. For such studies a written Informed Consent from study participants is not required. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the mechanical stability of a modified pedicle screw fixator and compare it with unilateral lumbopelvic fixation for treating sacroiliac joint disruption using finite element simulation technology., Methods: The digital model of a normal spine-pelvis-femur containing the main pelvic and lumbar ligaments was established based on computed tomography images. A sacroiliac joint disruption model was built and validated, which was stabilized with the models of a modified pedicle screw fixator or unilateral lumbopelvic fixation. A 400 N follower loading was applied to the lumbar vertebrae for the 2 fixation models to analyze displacement and stress distribution. In addition, the construct stiffness was calculated., Results: The peak amounts of sacral vertical displacement, horizontal displacement, posterior displacement, and overall displacement were 0.70 mm, 0.17 mm, 0.73 mm, and 0.88 mm, respectively, in the modified pedicle screw fixator model, which were less than those in the unilateral lumbopelvic fixation model (1.17 mm, 0.31 mm, 2.21 mm, and 2.29 mm, respectively). Compared with unilateral lumbopelvic fixation, the percentage decreases of the modified pedicle screw fixators were 40.2%, 45.2%, 67.0%, and 61.6%, respectively. The peak stress of the internal fixation and pelvis in the modified pedicle screw fixator model was 351.23 MPa and 39.91 MPa, which has 15.5% and 70.4% lower than in the unilateral lumbopelvic fixation model. The construct stiffness of the modified pedicle screw fixator (571 N/ mm) was 67% better than that of unilateral lumbopelvic fixation (342 N/mm)., Conclusion: The finite element simulation results showed that the modified pedicle screw fixator model demonstrated smaller sacral displacement, fewer stresses on the internal fixation and bone, and higher construct stiffness compared with the unilateral lumbopelvic fixation model. Thus, the modified pedicle screw fixator may provide biomechanical advantages over unilateral lumbopelvic fixation in the treatment of sacroiliac joint disruption.

Objective: To describe sacroiliac luxation stabilization in cats using two screws and to report clinical and radiographic short-term outcomes., Study Design: Retrospective clinical cohort study., Sample Population: Cats (n = 67) with sacroiliac luxation., Methods: Case records of cats presented for sacroiliac luxation stabilized using two screws per side affected, one lag and one positional, between 2014 and 2023 were reviewed. The percentage of sacral purchase (PoSP) for each screw, percentage of reduction (PoR), and pelvic canal width ratio (PCWR) were measured and calculated., Results: Eighty-two sacroiliac luxations were stabilized. Two 2.0 mm screws were used in 69 cases; two 2.4-mm screws in nine cases, and one 2.4 mm with one 2.0 mm screw in four cases. The mean PoSPs for lag and positional screws were 46% ± 12 and 31% ± 11, respectively. The median PoR was 89% (41 to 100). The mean PCWR was 1.23 ± 0.11. Clinical follow up was available for 42 cats with 53 sacroiliac luxations at a median of 87 days (36 to 2503). The full function was noted in 34 patients (81%). Screw failure occurred in five sacroiliac joints (4.7%), including loosening (n = 3), and breakage (n = 2) of the positional screws (n = 1). Pelvic canal diameter was maintained in all cases., Conclusion: Excellent functional and radiographic outcomes were obtained for cats with sacroiliac luxation stabilized with two sacroiliac screws., Clinical Significance: Feline sacroiliac luxation can be stabilized using two sacroiliac screws., (© 2024 American College of Veterinary Surgeons.)

Case: A 53-year-old man with bilateral sacroiliac (SI) fracture-dislocations underwent open reduction internal fixation with subsequent loss of fixation. Revision involved the placement of pelvic brim screws and robotic-assisted lumbopelvic fixation, resulting in minimal blood loss and soft-tissue injury. At 3-month follow-up, the patient had healed and was advanced to full weight-bearing status., Conclusion: Percutaneous SI screws and robotic-assisted spinopelvic fixation effectively managed bilateral SI fracture-dislocations, despite narrow osseous corridors, providing adequate stabilization while minimizing complications. The combination of these 2 techniques helped overcome anatomical limitations and reduced technical challenges, leading to a successful short-term outcome., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C360)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether multi-segment fusion or fusion-to-sacrum increases sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology compared with single-segment fusion or a non-fused sacrum., Methods: This study included 116 patients who underwent lumbar or lumbosacral fusion and were followed up for 2 years. The patients were classified into single-segment fusion (n = 46) and multi-segment fusion (more than two levels, n = 70) groups and then reclassified into the non-fused sacrum (n = 68) and fusion-to-sacrum groups (n = 48). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were used to evaluate radiographic parameters, and computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate SIJ degeneration. Low back pain (LBP) was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). Baseline and postoperative values were compared using a paired sample t-test., Results: LBP VAS scores significantly differed at 6 months (single-segment fusion, 3.04±1.88; multi-segment fusion, 4.83±2.33; P < 0.001) and 2 years postoperatively (single-segment fusion, 3.3±2.2; multi-segment fusion, 4.78±2.59; P = 0.094). There was no significant difference in SIJ degeneration, as assessed by CT scan, between the 2 surgical groups: 14 (30%) and 19 (27%) patients in the single-segment and multi-segment (P = 0.701) fusion groups, respectively. The LBP VAS scale showed comparable differences at 1 (non-fused sacrum, 3±2.18; fusion-to-sacrum, 3.74±2.28; P = 0.090) and 2 years postoperatively (non-fused sacrum, 3.29±2.01; fusion-to-sacrum, 4.66±2.71; P = 0.095). CT scan revealed that 18 (26%) and 15 (31%) patients in the non-fused sacrum and fusion-to-sacrum groups, respectively, developed SIJ arthritis; however, there was no significant intergroup difference (P = 0.574)., Conclusions: SIJ degeneration occurs independent of the number of fused segments or sacrum involvement., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Internal hemipelvectomy is a limb sparing procedure most commonly indicated for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors of the pelvis. Partial resection and pelvic reconstruction may be challenging for orthopedic oncologists due to late presentation, high tumor burden, and complex anatomy. Specifically, wide resection of tumors involving the periacetabular and sacroiliac (SI) regions may compromise adjacent vital neurovascular structures, impair wound healing, or limit functional recovery. We aimed to present a series of patients treated at our institution who underwent periacetabular internal hemipelvectomy (Type II) with or without sacral extension (Type IV) in combination with a systematic review to investigate postoperative complications, functional outcomes, and implant and patient survival following pelvic tumor resection via Type II hemipelvectomy with or without Type IV resection., Materials and Methods: A surgical registry of consecutive patients treated with internal hemipelvectomy for primary or secondary pelvic bone tumors at our institution since 1994 was retrospectively reviewed. All type II resection patients were stratified into two separate cohorts, based on whether or not periacetabular resection was extended beyond the SI joint to include the sacrum (Type IV), as per the Enneking and Dunham classification. Patient demographics, operative parameters, complications, and oncological outcomes were collected. Categorical and continuous variables were compared with Pearson's chi square or Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Literature review according to PRISMA guidelines queried studies pertaining to patient outcomes following periacetabular internal hemipelvectomy. The search strategy included combinations of the key words "internal hemipelvectomy", "pelvic reconstruction", "pelvic tumor", and "limb salvage". Pooled data was compared using Pearson's chi square. Statistical significance was established as p < 0.05., Results: A total of 76 patients were treated at our institution with internal hemipelvectomy for pelvic tumor resection, of whom 21 had periacetabular resection. Fifteen patients underwent Type II resection without Type IV involvement, whereas six patients had combined Type II/IV resection. There were no significant differences between groups in operative time, blood loss, complications, local recurrence, postoperative metastasis, or disease mortality. Systematic review yielded 69 studies comprising 929 patients who underwent internal hemipelvectomy with acetabular resection. Of these, 906 (97.5 %) had only Type II resection while 23 (2.5 %) had concomitant Type II/IV resection. While overall complication rates were comparable, Type II resection alone produced significantly fewer neurological complications when compared to Type II resection with sacral extension (3.9 % vs. 17.4 %, p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between rates of wound complications, infections, or construct failures. Local recurrence, postoperative metastasis, and survival outcomes were similar. Type II internal hemipelvectomy without Type IV resection on average produced higher postoperative MSTS functional scores than with Type IV resection., Conclusion: In our series, the two groups exhibited no differences. From the systematic review, operative parameters, local recurrence or systemic metastasis, implant survival, and disease mortality were comparable in patients undergoing Type II internal hemipelvectomy alone compared to patients undergoing some combination of Type II/IV resection. However, compound resections increased the risk of neurological complications and experienced poorer MSTS functional scores., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Spine fixation surgery affects the biomechanical environment in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), which may lead to the SIJ pain or degeneration after surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of the number and position of fixed segments on the SIJs and provide references for surgeons to plan fixation levels and enhance surgical outcomes., Methods: The intact lumbar-pelvis finite element (FE) models and 11 fixation FE models with different number and position of fixed segments were developed based on CT images. A 400N follower load and 10° range of motion (ROM) of the spine were applied to the superior endplate of L1 to simulate the flexion, extension, bending and torsion motion after surgery. The peak stress on the SIJs, lumbar intervertebral discs, screws and rods were calculated to evaluate the biomechanical effects of fixation procedures., Results: With the lowermost instrumented vertebra (LIV) of L5 or S1, the peak stress on SIJs increased with the number of fixed segments increasing. The flexion motion led to the greater von Mises stress on SIJ compared with other load conditions. Compared with the intact model, peak stress on all fixed intervertebral discs was reduced in the models with less than three fixed segments, and it increased in the models with more than three fixed segments. The stress on the SIJ was extremely high in the models with all segments from L1 to L5 fixed, including L1-L5, L1-S1 and L1-S2 fixation models. The stress on the segment adjacent to the fixed segments was significant higher compared to that in the intact model. The peak stress on rods and screws also increased with the number of fixed segments increasing in the flexion, extension and bending motion, and the bending and flexion motions led to the greater von Mises stress on SIJs., Conclusion: Short-term fixation (≤2 segments) did not increase the stress on the SIJs significantly, while long-term segment fixation (≥4 segments) led to greater stress on the SIJs especially when all the L1-L5 segments were fixed. Unfixed lumbar segments compensated the ROM loss of the fixed segments, and the preservation of lumbar spine mobility would reduce the risks of SIJ degeneration., (© 2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Incomplete sacroiliac joint injuries are often associated with external rotation and extension deformities on the injured hemipelvis. To appropriately correct this deformity, an oblique reduction force from caudal to cranial and lateral to medial is helpful. These injuries are often associated with traumatic disruption of the pubic symphysis. However, in injuries without traumatic disruption to the pubic symphysis, a two-pin oblique anterior external fixator can be used to obtain and maintain reduction of the sacroiliac joint, while percutaneous fixation is subsequently placed. Through a small case series and three specific patient examples, we demonstrate that the oblique anterior external fixator frame is a simple and effective strategy with the reduction and stabilization process of these multiplanar hemipelvis deformities., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.)

During the first postoperative days following minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF), patients often report serious pain, which contributes to high utilization of painkillers and prevention of early mobilization. This prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial investigates the effectiveness of intraoperative SIJ infiltration with bupivacaine 0.50% versus placebo (NaCl 0.9%) in 42 patients in reducing postoperative pain after MISJF. The primary outcome was difference in pain between bupivacaine and placebo groups, assessed as fixed factor in a linear mixed model. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and length of hospital stay. We found that SIJ infiltration with bupivacaine did not affect postoperative pain scores in comparison with placebo, neither as group-effect (p = 0.68), nor dependent on time (group*time: p = 0.87). None of the secondary outcome parameters were affected in the postoperative period in comparison with placebo, including opioid consumption (p = 0.81). To conclude, intra-articular infiltration of the SIJ with bupivacaine at the end of MISJF surgery is not effective in reducing postoperative pain. Hence, we do not recommend routine use of intraoperative SIJ infiltration with analgesia in MISJF., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Case: A rarely reported complication with sacroiliac joint fusion (SJF) is an iatrogenic injury to the superior gluteal artery (SGA). This case series includes 3 cases which had a suspected injury to the SGA. Case 1 describes how hemostasis achieved with exploration of the wound followed by embolization by interventional radiology (IR). In Case 2, electrocautery, hemostatic agents, and pressure were used with success. Case 3 highlights the use of IR as the initial method for controlling bleeding., Conclusion: This report describes a rare complication during SJF and provides an algorithm to help guide surgeons in decision making., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C438)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is the largest diarthrodial joint in the human body and accounts for approximately 20% of all low back pain, which is commonly seen in patients with lumbosacral fusions. Despite this, SIJ dysfunction often poses a challenging diagnosis depending on clinical evaluation, imaging, and image-guided joint injection. SIJ fusion is an effective and safe method of treatment, with minimally invasive approaches fitting well within the armamentarium of interventional radiologists treating chronic pain and other musculoskeletal conditions. Contemporary technical approaches and clinical considerations are discussed., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Minimally invasive surgical techniques for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation have the potential to reduce risk and improve patient outcomes, but evidence remains limited. This interim analysis presents initial findings from an ongoing prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Catamaran System., Methods: The primary endpoint of success at 6 months was defined as a ≥20 mm improvement in SIJ pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), no neurologic worsening, absence of device-related serious adverse events (SAEs), and no surgical reintervention. Secondary endpoints included 6 month evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), patient satisfaction, and 12 month radiographic CT fusion, performed by an indpendent radiologist., Results: Thirty-three consecutive patients (mean age: 58.9 years; %-females: 76%; Body Mass Index: 30.5) were treated across six U.S. clinical sites. At the primary endpoint of 6 months, 80% of patients met the criteria for success, with no device-related SAEs and no surgical reintervention reported. VAS SIJ-Pain significantly decreased from preoperative levels (mean: 80.9 mm) to 6 months postoperatively (31.1 mm; p  < 0.001). Mean ODI scores also showed a significant improvement from preoperative values (51.9%) to 6 months postoperatively (29.6%, p  < 0.01). Patients reported high satisfaction rates throughout all follow-ups, with 93.3% of patients being satisfied at 6 months., Conclusion: In patients diagnosed with chronic SIJ pain, minimally invasive inferior-posterior delivery of the Catamaran implant was safe and effective in relieving pain and reducing disability.

Purpose: The sacral alar-iliac screw (SAIS) fixation technique has evolved from spinopelvic fixation which originated from S2AIS to sacroiliac joint fixation, with more reports regarding its application of S2AIS than S1AIS. However, there is a lack of comparative evidence to determine which technique is superior for sacroiliac joint fixation. This study aimed to determine which of the screws was superior in terms of implantation safety and biomechanical stability for sacroiliac joint fixation., Methods: CT data of 80 normal pelvises were analyzed to measure the insertable range, trajectory lengths and widths of both S1AIS and S2AIS on 3D reconstruction models. Φ 6.5 mm and 8.0 mm screws were implanted on the left and right sides of fifty 3D printed pelvic models respectively to observe for breach of screw implantation. Ten synthetic pelvis models were used to simulate type C Tile injuries, and divided into 2 groups with an anterior plate and posterior fixation using one S1AIS or S2AIS on each side. The stiffness and maximum load of the plated and fixated models were measured under vertical loading., Results: The trajectory lengths and widths of the S1AIS and S2AIS were similar (p > 0.05) and there was no breach for Φ 6.5 mm SAIS. However, both the insertable range and trajectory length on the sacral side of S2AIS (234.56 ± 10.06 mm 2 , 40.97 ± 2.81 mm) were significantly less, and the breach rate of the posterior lateral cortex of the Φ 8.0 mm S2AIS (46%) was significantly higher than the S1AIS (307.55 ± 10.42 mm 2 , 42.16 ± 3.06 mm, and 2%, p < 0.05). The stiffness and maximum load of S2AIS were less than S1AIS but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: S1AIS and S2AIS have similar screw trajectories and stability. However, S1AIS has a larger insertable range, less breach of the posterior lateral sacral cortex and longer trajectory length on the sacral side than S2AIS, which indicates S1AIS has higher implantation safety and a trend of better mechanical performance over S2AIS for sacroiliac joint fixation. Furthermore, S2AIS with an excessively large diameter should be used with caution for sacroiliac joint fixation., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Patients with low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction have an impaired quality of life, due to reported pain, disability and activity limitations. There is increasing evidence that minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF) results in improvement in pain, disability and quality of life in these patients. Some studies have reported improvements in daily physical activity following MISJF but based on bias-prone self-reports. Our aim was to provide objective data on daily physical activity in patients with SIJ dysfunction. Daily physical activity in daily life of participants was measured using a triaxial accelerometer for seven consecutive days, before surgery and 3 months after surgery. Recorded daily activities were the daily number of events and total time spent sitting or lying, standing, walking, cycling, high-activity and number of steps and sit-to-stand transfers. The quality of life was assessed by the validated Dutch EQ-5D-5 L-questionnaire. No statistical differences were observed between daily physical activity in patients with SIJ dysfunction before and 3 months after MISJF. As compared to matched controls, high-intensity physical activity was lower in both the pre- and postoperative period ( p  = 0.007) for patients with SIJ dysfunction. The quality of life improved significantly in patients after MSIJF, from 0.418 to 0.797 ( p  = 0.021) but did not reach the level of controls (1.000). Daily physical activity in patients with postpartum SIJ dysfunction does not improve 3 months following MISJF, while quality of life does improve significantly. The discrepancy between these two observations is food for new research.

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion has become increasingly prevalent and is described to reduce pain and improve function. In some patients, pain can recur several months after primary surgery. Lack of early implant osseointegration might be a cause of pain and hence an indication for revision surgery. Triangular titanium implants are the most documented implant for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. There is, however, no knowledge of how triangular titanium implants osseointegrate in humans and whether fusion is induced over the sacroiliac joint. During planned revision surgery due to recurrent pain, six triangular titanium implants were retrieved from six different patients at median 9 months from primary surgery. All six implants were scanned using microcomputed tomography. The presence or absence of bone in-growth, on-growth, and through-growth of the implants was evaluated as an indication of implant osseointegration. Three of six implants showed no or minor signs of osseointegration. Of the three remaining implants, one showed partial osseointegration and two implants showed high degrees of osseointegration. This study showed that triangular titanium implants can osseointegrate into host bone in humans. When osseointegration occurs, triangular titanium implants can give fusion across the sacroiliac joint., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.)

To determine the presence of a consistent osseous corridor from the lateral-posterior aspect of the anterior inferior iliac spine to the sacral wing that could be used for safe trans percutaneous screw fixation for pelvic fragility fractures of the iliac wing and fracture dislocations of the sacroiliac joint (FFP types IIIa and IIIb). Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained from 100 patients and imported to Mimics software for 3D reconstruction. Then, a cylinder was drawn to imitate the modified LC-II screw and adjusted to a maximum radius and length to obtain the feasible region. Thirteen parameters of the osseous corridor of the modified LC-II screw were measured. Differences between sex groups were compared, and significant statistical correlations were carefully studied to determine potentially important clinical relationships. The records of patients with FFP type IIIa and IIIb fragility fractures of the pelvis were extracted from our hospital. Patients who underwent modified LC-II screw fixation, LC-II screw fixation or reconstruction plate fixation were included. Patients' operative characteristics and complications were recorded at follow-up. Fracture reduction quality was assessed using the Matta standard. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Majeed grading system. The mean maximum diameters of the osseous corridors of the modified LC-II screw in males and females were 12.73 and 10.83 mm, respectively. The mean maximum lengths of the osseous corridors of the modified LC-II screw in males and females were 96.37 and 93.37 mm, respectively. In the treatment of patients with FFP IIIa and FFP IIIb fractures, the group of treatment by the modified LC-II screws fixation was shown significantly shorter operative time and fewer intraoperative blood loss in comparison to that by the reconstruction plates. In the present study, all the males and females had a complete osseous corridor of the modified LC-II screw. The clinical results of the patients who were treated with modified LC-II screw fixation suggest that the novel method has a good preliminary outcome., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Surgical fixation of pediatric pelvic ring injuries is gaining popularity to avoid the poor long-term outcomes of pelvic asymmetry. The surgical techniques and fixation choices depend on the individual injuries affecting the anterior and posterior pelvic ring areas. The immature bony pelvis of young children has anatomic differences including soft bones, elastic ligaments, and the presence of growth centers. Understanding the unique pediatric lesions with unstable pelvic fractures is essential for treatment decisions. Anterior lesions include pubic symphysis disruption through the pubic apophysis, single ramus fractures, pubic rami fractures through the triradiate cartilage, and/or the ischiopubic synchondrosis; ischiopubic ramus infolding injury; or the unstable superior and inferior quadrant lesions. Posterior pelvic lesions include iliac wing infolding and sacroiliac joint dislocation or transiliac (crescent) fracture/dislocations through the iliac apophysis growth plate. Pubic symphysis and sacroiliac disruptions are physeal injuries in children, and they have excellent healing potential. External fixation is an ideal choice for anterior ring fixation including bony and pubic symphysis injuries. Posterior lesions are mostly sacroiliac joint disruptions with iliac apophysis separation that can serve as a landmark for vertical displacement correction. Posterior lesions can be treated by percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation or open reduction techniques., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Chronic sacroiliitis has variable etiologies with numerous treatments of varying efficacy. In recent years, a novel posterior approach utilizing bone matrix has been developed although to date, there is limited data in the literature regarding efficacy and safety through this approach. Benefits described include reduced adverse outcomes and quicker recovery when compared to the lateral approach., Objective: The present investigation focused on sacroiliac joint fusion through the posterior approach and outcomes including disability, pain, and use of analgesics post-surgery., Study Design: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted evaluating safety and efficacy of sacroiliac fusion allograft implants (LinQ Implant System from PainTEQ; PsiF System from Omnia Medical)., Methods: A total of 72 posterior approach sacroiliac joint fusions were performed. Fifty-three individuals were enrolled and followed at LSU Health Shreveport as the sole investigational site between August 2020 and June 2024. Selected participant age ranged between 28 and 79 years, with a mean age of 53.4 years. The LinQ Implant System was the primary surgical hardware selected for implantation (83.0%), with the PsiF System chosen in the remaining cases., Outcome Measures: VAS Scores, disability changes, adverse outcomes, and analgesic use were compared after sacroiliac joint fusion via the posterior approach., Results: Mean VAS Scores for SIJ Pain Intensity significantly decreased by 3.6 cm from a baseline score of 9.5 cm by the Specified End (June 1st, 2024). In this regard, 65.4% of patients experienced a 20% or greater improvement in pain, 38.5% of patients experienced a 50% or greater improvement in pain, and 26.9% of patients experienced a 70% or greater improvement in pain.  Zero (0) procedure-related adverse events nor intra- or post-operative complications occurred throughout the duration of the investigation., Limitations: Retrospective nature of the study without a control group. Fifty-four percent (39 of 72) completed minimum one year follow up. Further, the withdrawal rate was 26%., Conclusion: The results of the present investigation demonstrated effective outcomes with minimal adverse effects and improvements in disability over a three-year period in the largest single center study to date involving posterior approach sacroiliac joint fusion.

Purpose: To introduce anterior peri-sacroiliac joint osteotomy (APSJO) through the lateral-rectus approach (LRA) for treating pelvic fracture malunion and nonunion, and to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and potential effectiveness., Methods: Data of 15 patients with pelvic fracture malunion and nonunion who underwent treatment by APSJO were selected and analyzed. The reduction quality was assessed using the Mears and Velyvis criteria, while the pre-operative and post-operative function was revealed by the Majeed scoring system. The British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system was recruited for the evaluation of lumbosacral plexus function., Results: The average operative duration was 264.00 ± 86.75 min, while the intra-operative blood loss was 2000 (600, 3000) mL. Anatomical reduction was complete in three cases, satisfactory in ten cases, and unsatisfactory in two cases. Among the seven patients with lumbosacral plexus injury, the pre-operative Majeed grades were good in two cases, fair in two cases, and poor in three cases, while the post-operative Majeed grades were excellent in three cases, good in three cases, and fair in one case. Muscle strength recovered to M5 in two cases, M4 in three cases, and showed no recovery in two cases. The pre-operative Majeed grades were good in five cases, fair in two cases, and poor in one case of the series without lumbosacral plexus injury, while the post-operative Majeed grades were excellent in seven cases and good in one case., Conclusion: APSJO through LRA may be a feasible strategy for treating pelvic fracture malunion and nonunion with promising application., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The optimal configuration for spinopelvic fixation during multilevel spine fusion surgery for adult spine deformity remains unclear. Postoperative sacroiliac (SI) joint pain, S2AI screw loosening and implant breakage could be related to continued motion of the SI joint with use of only a single point of fixation across the SI joint., Methods: Prospective, international, multicenter randomized controlled trial of 222 patients with adult spine deformity scheduled for multilevel (4 or more levels) spine fusion surgery with pelvic fixation. Subjects were randomized to sacroalar (S2) iliac (S2AI) screws alone for pelvic fixation or S2AI + triangular titanium implants placed cephalad to S2AI screws. Quad rod techniques were not allowed or used. Baseline spinal deformity measures were read by an independent radiologist. Site-reported perioperative adverse events were reviewed by a clinical events committee. Quality of life questionnaires and other clinical outcomes are in process with planned 2-year follow-up., Results: One hundred thirteen participants were assigned to S2AI and 109 to S2AI + titanium triangular implants (TTI). 35/222 (16%) of all subjects had a history of SI joint pain or were diagnosed with SI joint pain during preoperative workup. Three-month follow-up was available in all but 4 subjects. TTI placement was successful in 106 of 109 (98%) subjects assigned to TTI. In 2 cases, TTI could not be placed due to anatomical considerations. Three TTI ventral iliac breaches were observed, all of which were managed non-surgically. One TTI subject had a transverse sacral fracture and 1 TTI subject had malposition of the implant requiring removal., Conclusions: SI joint pain is common in patients with adult spinal deformity who are candidates for multilevel spine fusion surgery. Concurrent placement of TTI parallel to S2AI screws during multilevel spine fusion surgery is feasible and safe. Further follow-up will help to determine the clinical value of this approach to augment pelvic fixation., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study performed in a nationwide insurance claims database., Objective: To evaluate the duration and magnitude of post-operative opioid prescriptions after minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion (MIS SIJF) as compared to other common spine surgeries., Summary of Background Data: MIS SIJF has been reported to significantly improve quality of life and reduce pain. However, there is a paucity of reported data on post-operative opioid use in patients undergoing MIS SIJF for sacroiliac joint dysfunction., Methods: A nationwide insurance claims database was queried to identify 4,666 patients who underwent MIS SIJF. Patients were stratified by pre-operative opioid use: Opioid naïve, sporadic use, or chronic use were respectively defined as 0,1, or≥2 opioid prescriptions filled within 6 months prior to surgery. Duration of opioid use was defined by the time between MIS SIJF and last opioid prescription filled while magnitude of opioid use was determined by milligram morphine equivalents filled by 30 days post-operation. This opioid use data was compared to that of other common spine surgeries., Results: Patients undergoing MIS SIJF continued to fill opioid prescriptions 1-year post-operatively at significantly higher proportions than those undergoing other common spine procedures assessed by prior literature within each of the pre-operative opioid use cohorts (chronic: 73% vs. 49-62%; P <0.0001, sporadic: 39% vs. 23-28%; P <0.0001, opioid naïve: 22% vs. 15-18%; P <0.0001). Chronic users filled the highest opiate dosages during the 30-day post-operative period, filling on average 64.75 MME/d compared to 19.75 MME/d and 24.25 MME/d by the opioid naïve and sporadic users, respectively., Conclusion: After MIS SIJF, opioid naïve patients use fewer opioids and for a shorter period of time compared to patients with sporadic or chronic pre-operative opioid use. MIS SIJF may result in less effective pain reduction when compared to other common spine surgeries evaluated via identical methodology., Level of Evidence: 3., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: There is conflicting evidence regarding treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for long-lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. The primary aim of our cohort study was to investigate change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint surgery in daily practice in the Swedish Spine Registry. Secondary aims were to explore the proportion of patients reaching a patient acceptable symptom score (PASS) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for pain scores, physical function, and health-related quality of life outcomes; furthermore, to evaluate self-reported satisfaction, walking distance, and changes in proportions of patients on full sick leave/disability leave and report complications and reoperations., Methods: Data from the Swedish Spine Registry was collected for patients with first-time sacroiliac joint fusion, aged 21 to 70 years, with PROMs available preoperatively, at 1 or 2 years after last surgery. PROMs included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain, and EQ-VAS, in addition to demographic variables. We calculated mean change from pre- to postoperative and the proportion of patients achieving MCID and PASS., Results: 68 patients had available pre- and postoperative data, with a mean age of 45 years (range 25-70) and 59 (87%) were female. At follow-up the mean reduction was 2.3 NRS points (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.9; P < 0.001) for LBP and 14.8 points (CI 10.6-18.9; P < 0.001) for ODI. EQ-VAS improved by 22 points (CI 15.4-30.3, P < 0.001) at follow-up. Approximately half of the patients achieved MCID and PASS for pain (MCID NRS LBP: 38/65 [59%] and PASS NRS LBP: 32/66 [49%]) and physical function (MCID ODI: 27/67 [40%] and PASS ODI: 24/67 [36%]). The odds for increasing the patient's walking distance to over 1 km at follow-up were 3.5 (CI 1.8-7.0; P < 0.0001), and of getting off full sick leave or full disability leave was 0.57 (CI 0.4-0.8; P = 0.001). In the first 3 months after surgery 3 complications were reported, and in the follow-up period 2 reoperations., Conclusion: We found moderate treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion when applied in daily practice with moderate pain relief and small improvements in physical function.

Background: In acetabular fracture surgery, an infra-acetabular screw (IAS) is inserted from the anterior to the posterior column through the infra-acetabular corridor to stabilize both columns. Although the IAS is useful for increasing fixation strength, proper placement requires proficiency and often results in extraosseous screw penetration. The complex anatomy of the infra-acetabular corridor and difficult intraoperative detection of the ideal insertion point and angle make proper placement of the IAS challenging. This study aimed to detect the ideal insertion point and angle of the IAS based on anatomical landmarks that can be directly identified intraoperatively., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the pelvic CT of 50 adults who underwent serial slice CT imaging. The pelvic inlet plane (PIP), which contains the anterior border of both the sacroiliac joint and posterior superior edge of the pubic symphysis, was used as the reference plane for the pelvic coordinate system to simulate the ideal insertion of IAS. The distance from the posterior superior edge of the pubic symphysis to the ideal insertion point of the IAS (IAS distance) and the angle and length of the IAS that could be inserted from the ideal insertion point were measured., Results: The mean IAS distance was 61.0 ± 5.7 mm (57.6 ± 4.3 mm in men and 64.4 ± 4.9 mm in women). The mean angle between ideal IAS and yz-plane on the outlet view (α-angle) was 8.4 ± 6.6 ° (6.4 ± 5.6° in men and 10.5 ± 7.0° in women). The mean angle between ideal IAS and y-axis on the yz-plane (β-angle) was 86.5 ± 10.6 ° (86.0 ± 10.3° in men and 87.0 ± 10.9° in women). The length of IAS was 97.1 ± 4.7 mm in men and 89.2 ± 3.6 mm in women., Conclusion: The IAS ideal insertion point detected as a distance from the pubic symphysis may aid in the proper insertion of the IAS during surgery. The insertion angle was parallel or tilted 10 ° laterally to the longitudinal axis in the pelvic outlet plane and almost perpendicular to the PIP in the sagittal plane when inserted from the ideal insertion point., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that may have influenced the work reported in this study., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reconstruction of the pelvic ring after the resection of pelvic tumours involving the sacroiliac joint is challenging. Although pedicle screw and rod system reconstructions are commonly performed, failure at the early stage has been reported. Surgical procedures Reconstruction involving two or more strong anchor screws (iliac, ischial, and pubis screws) into the residual pelvis, connecting with at least two rods with minimal bending to the residual lumbosacral vertebra and contralateral pelvis. Methods: The above reconstruction was performed for six malignant bone and soft-tissue pelvic tumours requiring Enneking type I + IV resection. A double-barreled free non-vascularized fibular graft was used in all patients, except for one. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 51 months (range, 9 to 96 months), and peri-operative complications, implant failure within the follow-up period, and the clinical results of surgery were investigated. Results: The mean age of four females and two males at the initial surgery was 37.2 years. One patient developed a deep wound infection. Two patients died due to metastasis of the tumor. All patients were able to walk on their own within 12 weeks of surgery. There was no implant failure, except in two patients with contralateral lumbosacral rod fracture three and four years after surgery, for which one patient required rod replacement. Conclusions: The incidence of implant failure, particularly around the resection site, was low, which may be attributed to multiple periacetabular screws and rods with minimal bending. Our rigid reconstruction method enables the rapid resumption of walking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Computed tomography is considered the gold-standard imaging tool to evaluate spinal implant accuracy. However, there are no studies that evaluate the accuracy of robotic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) implant placement using CT to date. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of implant placement on CT between robotic and fluoroscopic navigation for SIJ fusion and the subsequent complications and clinical outcomes of suboptimally placed screws., Methods: A retrospective analysis of SIJ fusions utilizing either robotic or fluoroscopic guidance at a single institution was conducted from 2014 to 2023. Implant placement accuracy was evaluated on intra- or postoperative CT. Primary endpoints were SIJ screw placement accuracy and complications. Secondary endpoints were pain status at the first and second follow-ups and rates of 2-year revision surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests., Results: Sixty-nine patients who underwent 78 SIJ fusions were included, of which 63 were robotic and 15 were fluoroscopic. The mean age of the cohort at the time of surgery was 55.9 ± 14.2 years, and 35 patients (50.7%) were female. There were 135 robotically placed and 34 fluoroscopically placed implants. A significant difference was found in implant placement accuracy between robotic and fluoroscopic fusion (97.8% vs 76.5%, p < 0.001). When comparing optimal versus suboptimal implant placement, no difference was found in the presence of 30-day complications (p = 0.98). No intraoperative complications were present in this cohort. No difference was found in subjective pain status at the first (p = 0.69) and second (p = 0.45) follow-ups between optimal and suboptimal implant placement. No patients underwent 2-year revision surgery., Conclusions: Use of robotic navigation was significantly more accurate than the use of fluoroscopic navigation for SIJ implant placement. Complications overall were low and not different between optimally and suboptimally placed implants. Suboptimally placed implants did not differ in degree of subjective pain improvement or rates of revision surgery postoperatively.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of intraoperative slide rail CT combined with C-arm X-ray assistance and just C-arm for percutaneous screw in the treatment of pelvic posterior ring injury., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the patient data of 76 patients with posterior pelvic ring injury admitted to the Department of Orthopedic Trauma from December 2018 to February 2022. Among them, 39 patients in the CT group were treated with C-arm combined with slide rail CT-assisted inline fixation including 23 males and 16 females with an average age of (44.98±7.33) years old;and the other 37 patients in the C-arm group were treated with intraline fixation treatment under only C-arm fluoroscopy including 24 males and 13 females with an average age of (44.37±10.82) years old. Among them, 42 patients with anterior ring fractures were treated with percutaneous inferior iliac spines with internal fixation (INFIX) or suprapubic support screws to fix the anterior pelvic ring. Postoperative follow-up time, operation time, complications of the two groups were compared. Results of Matta reduction criteria, Majed efficacy evaluation, the CT grading and the rate of secondary surgical revision were compared., Results: The nailing time of (32.63±7.33) min in CT group was shorter than that of (52.95±10.64) min in C-arm group ( t =-9.739, P <0.05). The follow-up time between CT group (11.97±1.86) months and C-arm group (12.03±1.71) months were not statistically significant( P >0.05). The postoperative complication rates between two groups were not statistically significant ( χ 2 =0.159, P >0.05). Results of Matta reduction criteria ( Z =2.79, P <0.05), Majeed efficacy evaluation( Z =2.79, P <0.05), CT grading ( Z =2.83, P <0.05) in CT group were better than those in C-arm group( P <0.05); the secondary surgical revision rate in the CT group was significantly lower than that in the C-arm group ( χ 2 =5.641, P <0.05)., Conclusion: Compared with traditional C-arm fluoroscopy, intraoperative slide rail CT combined with C-arm assisted percutaneous sacroiliac joint screw placement surgery has the characteristics of short operation time, high accuracy and safety, and significant decrease in postoperative secondary revision rate, and is one of the effective methods for re-establishing the stability of the posterior ring of pelvic fracture.

Objective: To describe fluoroscopically-assisted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac-luxation (SIL) in cats and report radiographic results and long-term functional outcomes., Study Design: Retrospective clinical study., Animals: Eleven cats., Methods: Percutaneous fixation of 17 SILs in 11 cats was performed with 2.4 mm headless cannulated compression screws under fluoroscopic guidance. Luxation-reduction, screw placement and purchase within the sacral body, pelvic canal diameter ratio (PCDR) and hemipelvic canal width ratio (HCWR) were assessed on pre- and postoperative radiographs. Radiographic follow-up was performed to assess the same parameters when available. Long-term clinical outcome was evaluated with an owner questionnaire. Wilcoxon paired-test was performed for comparison., Results: Mean age and bodyweight of the cats were 3.3 ± 2.6 years and 4.0 ± 0.82 kg, respectively. Nine cats presented with concurrent pelvic injuries. Median luxation-reduction was 94.1% (IQR = 13.9) and median screw-purchase within the sacral body was 73.3% (IQR = 17.0) immediately postoperatively. One screw exited the sacral body caudally. Upon 7-week radiographic follow-up, luxation-reduction (88.3%, IQR = 20.1) and screw-purchase (70.7%, IQR = 12.8) had decreased compared to immediately postoperatively (p = .008 and p = .013 respectively). Screw migration was not observed. PCDR and HCWR measured on postoperative radiographs indicated successful restoration of the pelvic canal width. Owners reported an excellent long-term functional outcome (mean postoperative time: 19 ± 5 months)., Conclusion: Fluoroscopically-assisted closed reduction and fixation of feline SIL using 2.4 mm headless cannulated compression screws allowed good reduction and optimal screw purchase within the sacral body. An excellent functional outcome was reported., Clinical Significance: Minimally invasive reduction and fixation with headless compression screws should be considered in cats with SIL., (© 2024 The Authors. Veterinary Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Surgeons.)

Purpose of Review: To evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency neurotomy in managing sacroiliac joint pain utilizing a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies., Recent Findings: The prevalence of sacroiliac joint pain is estimated at around 25% of low back pain cases, and its diagnosis lacks a gold standard. Treatments include exercise therapy, injections, ablation, and fusion, with variable effectiveness. COVID-19 altered utilization patterns of interventions, including sacroiliac joint procedures, and the evidence for these interventions remains inconclusive. Recently, Medicare has issued its local coverage determinations (LCDs) in the United States, which provides noncoverage of sacroiliac joint radiofrequency neurotomy. Additionally, a recent systematic review of sacroiliac joint injections showed Level III or fair evidence. The sacroiliac joint, a critical axial joint linking the spine and pelvis, contributes to low back pain. Its complex innervation pattern varies among individuals. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction, causing pain and stiffness, arises from diverse factors.The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate radiofrequency neurotomy's effectiveness for sacroiliac joint pain management by applying rigorous methodology, considering both RCTs and observational studies. Despite methodological disparities, the evidence from this review, supported by changes in pain scores and functional improvement, suggests Level III evidence with fair recommendation for radiofrequency neurotomy as a treatment option. The review's strengths include its comprehensive approach and quality assessment. However, limitations persist, including variations in criteria and technical factors, underscoring the need for further high-quality studies in real-world scenarios., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion, to treat back pain caused by SIJ dysfunction, can employ open or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques and either cylindrical (screw-shaped) or triangular (wedge-shaped) implants. Fusion nonunion sometimes explains recurrent SIJ pain following fusion and occasionally requires hardware revision. MIS revision minimizes patient pain, infection, and disability, but due to the triangular implant size and form factor, implant removal can present challenges for MIS access during the explantation and achieving good bony purchase for reinstrumentation. Here, we report a prone single-position lateral MIS/posterior mini-open procedure for triangular-implant SIJ fusion revision., Methods: The patient is a 72-year-old female who underwent right SIJ fusion for lower back and leg pain sustained after a fall 2 years prior but experienced recurrent pain over the subsequent 2 years, with imaging findings of right SIJ peri-hardware lucencies and diagnostic injections confirming persistent right-sided sacroiliitis., Results: The patient underwent hardware removal using the lateral MIS incision with table-mounted tubular access and image-guided navigation to maintain exposure, plus simultaneous reinstrumentation using a navigated S2-alar-iliac screw and iliac bolt construct with connecting rod through the posterior mini-open incision made for the navigation reference frame spinous process clamp., Conclusions: The use of navigation and MIS access can significantly decrease the complexity of lateral hardware removal, and mini-open navigated screw-and-rod constructs offer reinstrumentation options accessible to surgeons unfamiliar with specialized posterior SIJ systems., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Obesity is increasing. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between obesity and adverse events after lumbar fusion. There is limited evidence on the effect of obesity on minimally invasive SI joint fusion (SIJF) outcomes., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of obesity on patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing SIJF surgery using triangular titanium implants (TTI)., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study based on four prospective clinical trials (INSITE [NCT01681004], SIFI [NCT01640353], iMIA [NCT01741025], and SALLY [NCT03122899])., Patient Sample: Adult patients ≥18 years of age who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion between 2012 and 2021., Outcome Measures: Visual analog scale (VAS Pain), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)., Methods: Participants were classified using the National Institutes of Health body mass index (BMI). Patients with a BMI of 30 to 39 with no significant comorbidity are considered obese, patients with a BMI of 35 to 39 with a significant comorbidity or a BMI of 40 or greater are considered morbidly obese. All subjects underwent either minimally invasive SIJ fusion with TTI or nonsurgical management (INSITE and iMIA studies only). All subjects completed SIJ pain scale scores (measured with a 100-point VAS) and disability scores (measured with ODI) at baseline and at scheduled visits to 24 months. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine the impact of BMI category on score changes., Results: In the SIJF group, mean SIJ pain improved at 24 months by 53.3 points (p<.0001). Over the 24-month follow-up period, BMI category did not impact mean improvement in SIJ pain scale score (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) p=.44). In the SIJF group, mean ODI at 24 months improved by 25.8 points (p<.0001). BMI category did not impact mean improvement in ODI (ANOVA p=.60). In the nonsurgical management (NSM) group, mean improvements in SIJ pain scale and ODI were clinically small (8.7 and 5.2 points, respectively) and not affected by BMI category (ANOVA p=.49 and .40)., Conclusion: This study demonstrates similar benefits and risks of minimally invasive SIJ fusion with TTI across all BMI categories. This analysis suggests that obese patients benefit from minimally invasive SIJ fusion and should not be denied this procedure based solely on elevated BMI., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To analyze the short-term and long-term efficacy of Osteoset artificial bone graft fusion mixed with rifampicin for injection in the treatment of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis., Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 70 patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint tuberculosis who were admitted and underwent surgical treatment in our orthopedics department between April 2014 and May 2020. The patients were divided into three groups based on the different bone graft materials used: autogenous bone graft group (25 cases), simple lesion removal group (18 cases), and drug-loaded calcium sulfate bone graft group (27 cases). General information and surgical details of the three groups were compared. Sacroiliac X-ray and CT scans were performed at regular intervals to record pre- and post-treatment erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, bone graft fusion rates at 6, 12, and 18 months post-surgery, Majeed score for functional evaluation, and postoperative complications., Results: There was no statistically significant difference in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and intraoperative pus removal volume among the three groups of patients (P > .05). Postoperatively, 70 patients were followed up, and the serum levels of ESR and CRP in all three groups of patients were significantly reduced at 3 months after surgery (P < .05). In the autogenous bone graft group, the bone graft fusion rates were 24.00% (6/25) at 6 months postoperatively, 76.00% (18/25) at 12 months, and 96.00% (24/25) at 18 months. In the simple lesion removal group, the bone graft fusion rates were 16.67% (3/18) at 6 months postoperatively, 27.78% (5/18) at 12 months, and 55.56% (10/18) at 18 months. In the drug-loaded calcium sulfate bone graft group, the bone graft fusion rates were 18.52% (5/27) at 6 months postoperatively, 55.56% (15/27) at 12 months, and 81.48% (22/27) at 18 months. In the autogenous bone graft group, the postoperative Majeed score averaged (91.47±4.13) points, with 13 cases rated as excellent and 10 cases rated as good, resulting in an excellent and good rate of 92.00% (23/25). The Majeed scores at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were (67.19±4.22) points, (80.28±5.83) points, and (91.47±4.13) points, respectively. Among them, there were 4 excellent and 3 good cases at 6 months postoperatively, with an excellent and good rate of 28.00% (7/25). At 12 months postoperatively, there were 8 excellent and 10 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 72.00% (18/25). At 18 months postoperatively, there were 13 excellent and 10 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 92.00% (23/25). In the simple lesion removal group, the Majeed scores at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were (59.17±3.95) points, (69.84±5.16) points, and (76.22±8.76) points, respectively. There were 2 excellent and 2 good cases at 6 months postoperatively, with an excellent and good rate of 22.22% (4/18). At 12 months postoperatively, there were 4 excellent and 3 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 38.89% (7/18). At 18 months postoperatively, there were 5 excellent and 5 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 55.56% (10/18). In the drug-loaded calcium sulfate bone graft group, the Majeed scores at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were (63.24±4.17) points, (77.39±5.50) points, and (86.64±7.03) points, respectively. There were 3 excellent and 3 good cases at 6 months postoperatively, with an excellent and good rate of 22.22% (6/27). At 12 months postoperatively, there were 9 excellent and 7 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 59.26% (16/27). At 18 months postoperatively, there were 10 excellent and 12 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 81.48% (22/27). The Majeed scores for all three groups of patients showed a significant increase in the three follow-up evaluations compared to pre-treatment (P < .05)., Conclusion: Drug-loaded Osteoset artificial bone graft fusion is a safe and effective method for treating bone defects after the debridement of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis lesions. It has fewer postoperative complications and achieves bone graft fusion in a shorter time compared to simple lesion removal methods.

The study aimed to explore an extra-articular screw placement strategy in Stoppa approach. Radiographic data of patients who underwent pelvic computed tomography from January 2016 to June 2017 were imported into Materiaise's interactive medical image control system software for three-dimensional reconstruction. Superior and lower margins of acetabulum and ipsilateral pelvic brim could be observed simultaneously through inlet-obturator view. A horizontal line from superior acetabular margin intersected pelvic brim at point "A" and another vertical line from lower margin intersected pelvic brim at point "B" were drawn, respectively. Lengths form sacroiliac joint to "A" (a), "A" to "B" (b), and "B" to pubic symphysis (c) were measured. Patients were divided into four groups depending on gender and side difference of measured hemi-pelvis: male left, male right, female left, and female right. Lengths of adjacent holes (d) and spanning different holes (e) of different plates were also measured. Mean lengths of a, b, c in four groups were 40.94 ± 1.85 mm, 40.09 ± 1.93 mm, 41.78 ± 3.62 mm, and 39.77 ± 2.23 mm (P = 0.078); 40.65 ± 1.58 mm, 41.48 ± 1.64 mm, 40.40 ± 1.96 mm, and 40.66 ± 1.70 mm (P = 0.265); 57.03 ± 3.41 mm, 57.51 ± 3.71 mm, 57.84 ± 4.40 mm, and 59.84 ± 4.35 mm (P = 0.165), respectively. Mean d length of different plates was 12.23 mm. Average lengths spanning 1, 2, 3 and 4 holes were 19.33 mm, 31.58 mm, 43.80 mm, and 55.93 mm. Our data showed that zones a and c could be safely inserted three and four screws. Penetration into hip joint could be avoided when vacant 3-hole drilling was conducted in zone b. Fracture line in zone b could serve as a landmark for screw placement., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Osteosynthesis for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) diastasis using an iliosacral screw (ISS) and a trans-iliac-trans-sacral screw (TITSS) can be performed using a closed or an open method. However, no clear indication for open reduction has been established., Methods: Data on patients with unilateral traumatic SIJ diastasis who underwent ISS and TITSS fixation were retrospectively collected and separated into groups according to the reduction method: closed reduction group (C group) and open reduction group (O group). Demographic data and perioperative image assessments were compared between the groups. The critical distance of the SIJ was identified to elucidate the indication for open reduction of the diastatic SIJ., Results: Fifty-six patients met the inclusion criteria over a 3-year period. There was no significant difference in the reduction quality of pelvic ring injuries between the groups, according to Matta's and Lefaivre's criteria. The improvement in the SIJ distance was significantly greater in the O group than in the C group in the axial plane on multiplanar computed tomography (p = 0.021). This model predicted that a difference of > 3.71 mm between the injured and healthy SIJ was a recommended indication for open reduction, with an area under the curve of 0.791 (95% confidence interval 0.627-0.955, p = 0.004)., Conclusions: Open reduction for SIJ diastasis might achieve better reduction quality than does closed reduction in the axial plane in selected cases. When the difference between the injured and healthy SIJ was wider than 3.71 mm, open reduction was recommended for satisfactory radiological outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: This is a single-surgeon series that prospectively evaluates the results of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion for patients with SIJ dysfunction using hydroxyapatite-coated screws (HACSs) compared with titanium triangular dowels (TTDs)., Methods: A total of 113 patients underwent SIJ fusion surgery between 2013 and 2018 at the University Hospital Llandough to treat symptomatic SIJ dysfunction not responding to nonoperative measures. Of the 113 patients, 40 were treated with HACSs and 73 with TTDs. Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were collected preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively, including the 36-item short-form health survey, Oswestry disability index, EuroQol-5D-5L, and Majeed pelvic score. Patients with ongoing symptoms were followed up beyond the study period., Results: Of the 113 patients, 33 completed follow-up in the HACS group compared with 61 in the TTD group. Both groups had comparable preoperative PROMs; however, the postoperative PROMs were significantly better in the TTD group. Additionally, 21 patients (63%) in the HACS group had radiological evidence of screw lysis compared with 5 patients (9%) in the TTD group. A subgroup analysis revealed less significant improvement in PROMs for patients with screw lysis compared with those without. Four patients were offered further revision surgery., Conclusions: Minimally invasive SIJ fusion has been shown to have good clinical outcomes for select patients. However, our experience shows that HACSs are associated with a high rate of screw lysis and poorer patient outcomes compared with TTDs. Therefore, we recommend the use of TTDs instead of HACSs for SIJ fusion surgery., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide, with sacroiliac joint pain comprising up to 30% of cases of axial lower back pain. Conservative therapies provide only modest relief. Although placebo-controlled trials show efficacy for sacral lateral branch cooled radiofrequency ablation, there are no comparative effectiveness studies., Methods: In this randomized, multicenter comparative effectiveness study, 210 patients with clinically suspected sacroiliac joint pain who obtained short-term benefit from diagnostic sacroiliac joint injections and prognostic lateral branch blocks were randomly assigned to receive cooled radiofrequency ablation of the L5 dorsal ramus and S1-S3 lateral branches or standard medical management consisting of pharmacotherapy, injections and integrative therapies. The primary outcome measure was mean reduction in low back pain score on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included measures of quality of life and function., Results: 3 months post-treatment, the mean Numeric Rating Scale pain score for the cooled radiofrequency ablation group was 3.8±2.4 (mean reduction 2.5±2.5) compared with 5.9±1.7 (mean reduction 0.4±1.7) in the standard medical management group (p<0.0001). 52.3% of subjects in the cooled radiofrequency ablation group experienced > 2 points or 30% pain relief and were deemed responders versus 4.3% of standard medical management patients (p<0.0001). Comparable improvements favoring cooled radiofrequency ablation were noted in Oswestry Disability Index score (mean 29.7±15.2 vs 41.5+13.6; p<0.0001) and quality of life (mean EuroQoL-5 score 0.68±0.22 vs 0.47±0.29; p<0.0001)., Conclusions: In patients with sacroiliac joint pain, cooled radiofrequency ablation provided statistically superior improvements across the spectrum of patient outcomes compared with standard medical management., Trial Registration Number: NCT03601949., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors received institutional research funding. SPC, LKa, LKo, SL, DPB and MJD are consultants for Avanos (which makes radiofrequency equipment). Currently, SPC is the editorial board member of RAPM., (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a common, underrecognized source of low back pain. We evaluated outcomes in patients undergoing sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) using a novel, minimally invasive SIJF system emphasizing compressive forces across an aggressively debrided SIJ. We retrospectively reviewed data from a continuous set of patients presenting to a large, tertiary care hospital from September 2017 to August 2019. All patients received the novel SIJF device. Outcomes were assessed at 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures, plus radiographic evaluation of fusion status. Data from 75 patients were analyzed. At 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months, the ODI score improved by 10.5 points ( P =.002), 17.4 points ( P <.0001), and 23.6 points ( P <.0001), respectively, while the NRS score improved by 4.6 points ( P <.0001), 4.4 points ( P <.0001), and 4.6 points ( P <.0001), respectively. SANE scores indicated high levels of patient satisfaction (81.0%, 92.18%, and 89.2%, respectively). PROMIS physical function scores improved by 2.65 points, 3.30 points, and 3.63 points, respectively, while PROMIS mental health scores showed changes of -1.93 points, 1.57 points, and -0.47 points, respectively. A review of computed tomography scans demonstrated grade 3 fusion (complete) in 81% of cases at a mean of 371 days postoperatively. There was one revision case for a malpositioned implant. The use of a novel SIJF device emphasizing compressive forces provided early, durable improvements in patient-reported outcomes and extremely high patient satisfaction. [ Orthopedics . 2024;47(2):101-107.].

Introduction: As the utilization of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) continues to expand, a better understanding of postoperative outcomes is needed, particularly in young and active individuals. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of this procedure in an active duty military population by examining return-to-duty (RTD) rates., Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of the electronic medical record from a tertiary military medical center was performed for active duty service members undergoing SIJF from January 2013 to January 2019. The primary outcome measured was RTD at 6 months, with active duty status at 1 year, last follow-up, and revision surgery as secondary outcomes. Demographic and surgical variables recorded included patient age, gender, military rank, utilization of navigation, and implant type., Results: Sixteen service members met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 40.5 ± 6.7 years. The mean follow-up after surgery was 24 ± 15 months. Patients received either cylindrical (n = 6) or triangular (n = 10) implants placed with (n = 6) or without (n = 10) navigation. Within 6 months of surgery, 56% of patients were able to RTD. Patients undergoing navigation-assisted procedures were significantly more likely to RTD at 6 months (100% vs. 30%, P = .011) compared to those undergoing surgery performed with orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging. Compared to those with cylindrical implants, patients with triangular implants were also more likely to RTD at 6 months (80% vs. 17%, P = .035)., Conclusions: Following SIJF, a small majority of service members were able to return to full active duty status by 6 months. Further studies are needed to assess the potential benefits of navigation and implant selection, as our retrospective review noted differences in outcomes based on these variables., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2023. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

This study is designed to compare the extent of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration at total hip arthroplasty (THA) for two pathologies: osteoarthritis of the hip (OA) and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ON). We also assessed the prevalence of SIJ degeneration in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or degenerative scoliosis. A total of 138 hips from 138 patients (69 OA and 69 ON) were assessed in this study, including 66 hips affected by OA secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. The degenerative changes in the SIJ and lumbar spine were evaluated prior to THA using radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans, showing 9 instances of spondylolisthesis and 38 of degenerative scoliosis. The OA group exhibited longer duration from onset to surgery than the ON group. The OA group also included more cases with significant pelvic obliquity (3 degrees or more) and with significant increases in SIJ sclerosis and irregularities. Patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or degenerative scoliosis were significantly more likely to have SIJ irregularities. The prevalence of SIJ degeneration was higher in cases of THA for OA than for ON. This study also suggests the possibility of Hip-SIJ-Spine syndrome in THA patients with OA., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

» The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a common cause of low back pain and should be included in the differential diagnosis.» Nonoperative treatment of sacroiliac pain is always the first line of therapy; however, when it is unsuccessful and becomes chronic, then recurrent nonoperative treatment becomes expensive.» Surgical treatment is cost-effective in appropriately selected patients. High-quality clinical trials have demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement compared with nonsurgical management in appropriately selected patients.» Spinal fusion to the sacrum increases degeneration of the SIJ and frequency of SIJ pain., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B61)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Purpose: The sacroiliac (SI) joint is recognized as a source of low back pain in 15-30% of patients. Though randomized controlled trials have shown clinical improvement following SI joint fusion in 83.1% of patients, revision rates of 2.9% within 2 years have been reported. There is a paucity of literature reviewing this small yet significant population of patients requiring revision surgery., Methods: Following IRB approval, retrospective review of patients, who underwent a revision SI joint fusion from 2009 to 2021 was completed. Patient-reported outcomes were measured before and at each clinic visit after surgery with visual analoge scale (VAS) for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patient characteristics (chronic opiate use and prior lumbar fusion) and surgical factors (operative approach, type/number of implants and use of bone graft) were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with Paired t and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression determined if patients met the minimally clinical important differences (MCID) for VAS-back pain and ODI scores at 1 year., Results: Fifty-two patients (77% female) with an average age of 49.1 (SD ± 11.1) years met inclusion criteria. Forty-four had single sided revisions and eight bilateral revisions. At 1 year follow-up there was no significant improvement in VAS-Back (p = 0.06) or ODI (p = 0.06). Patients with chronic opioid use were 8.5 times less likely to achieve the MDC for ODI scores (OR 0.118, p = 0.029). There was no difference in outcomes when comparing the different surgical approaches (p = 0.41)., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates patients undergoing revision surgery have moderate improvement in low back pain, however, few have complete resolution of their symptoms. Specific patient factors, such as chronic opiate use and female sex may decrease the expected improvement in patient-reported outcomes following surgery. Failure to obtain relief may be due to incorrect indications, lack of biologic fusion and/or presence of co-pathologies. Further clinical examination and consistent long-term follow-up, clarify the role revision surgery plays in long-term patient outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Sacral alar-iliac screws (SAISs) have been used for sacroiliac joint and are superiority to traditional sacroiliac screws (SISs) in patients with low bone density. The aim of this study was to investigate the operation safety and biomechanical stability of the SIS, transsacral-transiliac screw (TSTIS), S1AIS and S2AIS in the treatment of sacroiliac joint in simulated models of low bone density., Methods: CT data from 80 normal pelvic structures were employed to measure the anatomical parameters, including the safety zones of the S1AIS and S2AIS at the insertion point and the trajectory lengths of the SIS, TSTIS, S1AIS and S2AIS. Sixteen synthetic pelvises with simulated osteoporotic bone structure were used to simulate type C Tile lesions and divided into 4 groups with an anterior plate and posterior fixation using one of the following: 1) one SIS on each side, 2) one TSTIS fixing both sides, 3) one S1AIS on each side, or 4) one S2AIS on each side. The stiffness and maximum load of the specimens were analyzed using a biomechanical machine under vertical loading., Results: The safety zone of S1AIS was larger than that of S2AIS (p < 0.05). The TSTIS had the largest trajectory length, followed by the S1AIS and S2AIS, and the SIS had the smallest trajectory length (p < 0.05). However, the lengths of the TSTIS (26.1 ± 1.7 mm) and SIS (27.8 ± 1.8 mm) trajectories on the short side (the iliac side) were smaller than those of S1AIS (40.4 ± 3.8 mm) and S2AIS (39.1 ± 3.8 mm), thus indicating significant differences (p < 0.05). The stiffness and maximum load of S1AIS and S2AIS were similar and the greatest, followed by TSTIS and SIS (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: The stability of S1AIS and S2AIS is similar, both stronger than that of SIS and TSTIS, which have shorter lengths of the screw trajectories on the ilium side. However, the safety zone of S2AIS at the insertion point is smaller than that of S1AIS. Therefore, considering both safety and stability, S1AIS is the preferred choice for fixation of sacroiliac joint dislocation in simulated models of low bone density., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion has become increasingly recognized as the utilization of lumbar fusion has grown. Despite the significant morbidity associated with this condition, uncertainty regarding its diagnosis and treatment remains. We aim to update the current knowledge of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of post-lumbar surgery SIJD., Methods: PRISMA guidelines were used to search the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, and OVID databases for literature published in the last 10 years. The ROBIS tool was utilized for risk of bias assessment. Statistical analyses were performed using the R foundation. A Fisher's exact test was performed to determine the risk of SIJD based on operative technique, gender, and symptom onset timeline. Odds ratios were reported with 95% confidence intervals. A p-value [Formula: see text] 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: Seventeen publications were included. The incidence of new onset SIJD was 7.0%. The mean age was 56 years, and the follow-up length was 30 months. SIJD was more common with fixed lumbar fusion vs floating fusion (OR = 1.48 [0.92, 2.37], p = 0.083), fusion of [Formula: see text] 3 segments (p < 0.05), and male gender increased incidence of SIJD (OR = 1.93 [1.27, 2.98], p = 0.001). Intra-articular injection decreased the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score by 75%, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) reduced the score by 90%. An open approach resulted in a 13% reduction in VAS score versus 68 and 29% for SIJ fixation using the iFuse and DIANA approaches, respectively., Conclusions: Lumbar fusion predisposes patients to SIJD, likely through manipulation of the SIJ's biomechanics. Definitive diagnosis of SIJD remains multifaceted and a newer modality such as SPECT/CT may find a future role. When conservative measures are ineffective, RFA and SIJ fixation using the iFuse System yield the greatest improvement VAS and ODI., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (MISIJ) fusion is a surgical option to relieve SIJ pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare MISIJ fusion with triangular titanium implants (TTI) to nonoperative management of SIJ dysfunction., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included prospective clinical trials that compared MISIJ fusion to nonoperative management in individuals with chronic low back pain attributed to SIJ dysfunction. We evaluated pain on visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, patient satisfaction, and adverse events., Results: A total of 8 articles representing 3 trials that enrolled 423 participants were deemed eligible. There was a significant reduction in pain score with MISIJ fusion compared with nonoperative management (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.03 to -1.39). Similarly, ODI scores (SMD -1.03, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.81), SF-36 PCS scores (SMD 1.01, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.19), SF-36 MCS scores (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.9), and patient satisfaction (odds ratio 6.87, 95% CI 3.73 to 12.64) were significantly improved with MISIJ fusion. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups with respect to adverse events (SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.23)., Conclusion: Our analysis showed that MISIJ fusion with TTI shows a clinically important and statistically significant improvement in pain, disability score, HRQoL, and patient satisfaction with a similar adverse event profile to nonoperative management in patients with chronic low back pain attributed to SIJ dysfunction., Competing Interests: Competing interests:: None declared., (© 2024 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Objective:  The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of safe positioning of double 2.3-mm headless cannulated self-compression screws (HCS) in a small dog cadaveric sacroiliac luxation model and to compare the static rotational biomechanical properties of fixation repaired using two different screw systems with a minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique: double 2.3-mm HCS and a single 3.5-mm standard cortical screw placed in a lag fashion., Study Design:  A unilateral small dog sacroiliac luxation model was stabilized using double 2.3-mm HCS ( n  = 11) or a single 3.5-mm cortical screw ( n  = 11). Radiographic and computed tomography (CT) imaging analyses and biomechanical testing of rotational force on the sacroiliac joint of both fixations were performed. The maximum load at failure and failure modes of each fixation were recorded and compared., Results:  Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous application of double HCS was safe in a unilateral sacroiliac luxation model in small dogs without violation of the vertebral and ventral sacral foramen. Furthermore, resistance to rotational force applied on fixation of the sacroiliac joint repaired with double 2.3-mm HCS estimated by maximum failure load was significantly higher than that of a single 3.5-mm cortical screw ( p  < 0.001)., Conclusion:  Although this was an experimental cadaveric study, based on our results, the use of smaller double HCS may be beneficial as an alternative to the conventional single lag screw for stabilization of sacroiliac luxation in small dogs., Competing Interests: None declared., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: Postoperative sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) is a common manifestation of failed back surgery syndrome after a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, there is currently no consensus on the risk factors for SIJP after PLIF., Objectives: We explored the effects of abdominal obesity and sagittal imbalance on SIJP after PLIF., Study Design: This is a prospective observational cohort study., Setting: This study occurred at the Department of Spinal Surgery at a hospital affiliated with a medical university., Methods: A total of 401 patients who underwent PLIF from June 2018 to June 2021 were enrolled in this study. 36 patients experienced postoperative SIJP. In contrast, a matched group comprised 72 non-SIJP patients. We used 1:2 propensity score matching to compare obesity features and sagittal spine parameters in the 2 groups. Inflammatory cytokines and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were measured in the SIJP group., Results: A total of 36 patients (8.98%) experienced SIJP during the follow-up. Compared with the non-SIJP group, patients with postoperative SIJP had a higher body mass index (BMI), greater abdominal obesity, a higher incidence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis greater than 10°, and a higher incidence of a sagittal vertical axis greater than 5 cm (P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for waist circumference was greater than that for BMI (0.762 vs. 0.650, P = 0.049). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk factors for SIJP were abdominal obesity, a pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis of greater than 10°, and a sagittal vertical axis greater than 5 cm (P < 0.05). In patients with SIJP, interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and VAS scores were higher in the abdominal obesity group than in the non-abdominal obesity group (P < 0.05)., Limitations: There was no uniform diagnosis of SIJP, so the incidence rate of SIJP might not be accurate., Conclusions: The significant predictors of SIJP were abdominal obesity and sagittal imbalance. Patients with abdominal obesity showed higher levels of inflammatory markers and pain intensity. More attention should be paid to body shape and the angle of correction of lumbar lordosis before lumbar surgery.

Background and Objectives: Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction constitutes a leading cause of pain and disability. Although surgical arthrodesis is traditionally performed under open approaches, the past decade has seen a rise in minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques and new federally approved devices for MIS approaches. In addition to neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons, proceduralists from nonsurgical specialties are performing MIS procedures for SI pathology. Here, we analyze trends in SI joint fusions performed by different provider groups, along with trends in the charges billed and reimbursement provided by Medicare., Methods: We review yearly Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary data from 2015 to 2020 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for all SI joint fusions. Patients were stratified as undergoing MIS or open procedures. Utilization was adjusted per million Medicare beneficiaries and weighted averages for charges and reimbursements were calculated, controlling for inflation. Reimbursement-to-charge (RCR) ratios were calculated, reflecting the proportion of provider billed amounts reimbursed by Medicare., Results: A total of 12 978 SI joint fusion procedures were performed, with the majority (76.5%) being MIS procedures. Most MIS procedures were performed by nonsurgical specialists (52.1%) while most open fusions were performed by spine surgeons (71%). Rapid growth in MIS procedures was noted for all specialty categories, along with an increased number of procedures offered in the outpatient setting and ambulatory surgical centers. The overall RCR increased over time and was ultimately similar between spine surgeons (RCR = 0.26) and nonsurgeon specialists (RCR = 0.27) performing MIS procedures., Conclusion: Substantial growth in MIS procedures for SI pathology has occurred in recent years in the Medicare population. This growth can largely be attributed to adoption by nonsurgical specialists, whose reimbursement and RCR increased for MIS procedures. Future studies are warranted to better understand the impact of these trends on patient outcomes and costs., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.)

Background: Considerations of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and its role in causing lower back and limb pain have taken a secondary role ever since Mixter and Barr's hallmark article in 1934 on the herniated nucleus pulposus. However, recent literature has highlighted the contribution of sacroiliac joint degeneration in the development of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), especially in patients undergoing lumbar or lumbosacral spinal fusion surgeries. Many reports have studied the anatomy, physiology, and clinical significance of the sacroiliac joint, but none have linked its dysfunction with other spinal deformities., Case Description: A 63-year-old female with a history of multiple complex instrumented spinal fusions presented to our institution with progressive leftward coronal imbalance despite successful arthrodesis from T3 through S1. She was initially treated with decompression and reimplantation, but adjacent segment disease at the SIJ led to laxity, distal failure, and a worsening coronal deformity. A mechanical fall after her decompression surgery led to a dramatically increased coronal imbalance, which was ultimately treated using Lenke's kickstand rod technique. At 3.5 years follow up, the patient's coronal balance remains stable., Conclusion: Few studies have related SIJ degeneration and laxity with spinal deformity. Our case describes SIJ degeneration that evolved to joint laxity, which ultimately produced a leftward coronal imbalance according to the adjacent segment disease mechanism. Additionally, we describe the use of a kickstand rod to effectively correct the coronal imbalance, reduce pain levels, promote SIJ arthrodesis, and prevent further SIJ-related issues without significant complications over 3 years post-operation.

Background: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a chronic painful condition responsible for up to 30% of back pain. Treatment modalities include physiotherapy, intraarticular analgesic injections, ablation techniques or SIJ fusion. The severity of SIJ dysfunction is commonly assessed via subjective pain or disability scales. Quantitative gait analysis offers an objective means of evaluating patients with SIJ dysfunction prior to its surgical treatment., Methods: Ten patients diagnosed with severe SIJ dysfunction were matched with 10 healthy controls. All individuals underwent quantitative 3D gait analysis using the Qualisys program and statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences in gait parameters between the two groups., Results: Two groups of data were obtained; angular parameters described by the Gait Profile Score (GPS) and spatiotemporal parameters described in standard SI units. Statistically significant differences were found between the patient and control group for parameters: overall GPS (P=0.049), hip abduction/adduction (P=0.017) and ankle plantar/dorsal flexion (P=0.003), stride length (P=0.002), step length (P=0.001), swing time (P=0.03) and initial double limb support (P=0.02)., Conclusions: This paper is the first to perform complex quantitative gait analysis of patients with SIJ dysfunction and to compare it with healthy individuals. These results can provide clinicians with baseline gait values for these patients to objectively quantify the extent of their disease.