Search

Objective: Nasal airway surgery is often applied when treatment fails to relieve nasal obstruction. However, surgery that improves airflow does not always alleviate the symptoms of nasal obstruction. The perception of nasal breathing is likely more related to changes in mucosal temperature than the mechanical sensation of flow or pressure. This study aims to measure intranasal mucosal temperature pre-and post-surgery using endonasal thermal imaging, exploring its correlation with subjective nasal breathing and objective airflow measurements. Methods: A prospective study of adult patients with nasal obstruction managed with nasal airway surgery was performed. Intranasal mucosal temperatures were determined using the thermal endonasal image of the nasal passage produced by the infrared radiometric thermal camera (FILR VS290). A comparison was made between the mean values of mid-expiration (ExT) and mid-inspiration (InT) temperature data (internal nasal valve, nasal cavity, inferior turbinate, and overall airway [mean value]) and visual analog scale (VAS), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and nasal airway resistance (NAR) before and after surgery. Results: Seven patients (35.14 ± 16.45 years, 57.14% female) were included. All NOSE, VAS, and NAR improved after surgery (59.29 ± 10.89 vs 17.14 ± 14.64; P <.001, 64.50 ± 26.79 vs 18.57 ± 19.99; P <.001, 0.82 ± 0.48 vs 0.34 ± 0.11 Pa/cm3/s; P =.002, respectively). ExT, InT, and the difference between ExT and InT of three areas and overall airway were similar between pre-and post-surgery. No statistically significant correlations were found between intranasal mucosal temperature, VAS, NOSE, and NAR at pre-and post-surgery except for the difference between ExT and InT of overall airway and NOSE pre-operative (Pearson r = 0.57; 95% CI 0.06-1.09; P =.03). Conclusion: Endonasal thermal imaging can assess the intranasal mucosal temperature of a patient. However, more precise imaging of the nasal passages and data acquisition are required to establish mucosal temperature as an objective measure of nasal obstruction before and after nasal airway surgery in a clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate a referral‐based, tele‐otology service in rural and remote areas of the Northern Territory, Australia. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed of a tele‐otology service in 93 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities (2011 to 2019). Assessments included face‐to‐face examinations performed by Clinical Nurse Consultants and audiologists, and asynchronous reviews performed by otolaryngologists. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the likelihood of ear disease, adjusted for age and gender. Intra‐ and inter‐rater agreement was assessed between otolaryngologists. Results: A total of 3,950 patients were reviewed (6,838 encounters, 13,726 ear assessments). The median age of patients was 9.8 years (interquartile range: 7.2 years). Overall, 62.2% of patients were identified with ear disease and 62.5% identified with hearing loss. Substantial intra‐ and inter‐rater agreement in diagnosis was found between otolaryngologists (κ = 0.71 and κ = 0.78, respectively). The most common ear conditions identified were chronic otitis media (COM, 28.1%) and otitis media with effusion (OME, 16.5%). Topical or oral antibiotics were initiated in 14.1% of all encounters, most often for acute otitis media or COM. Surgery was recommended in 27.7% of all encounters, most often myringoplasty, adenoidectomy, and myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes. Conclusion: Tele‐otology is a critical component of an integrated approach to evaluating ear disease in Indigenous people living in rural and remote areas. The high prevalence of OME, COM, and surgical recommendations highlights the need for community engagement, regular follow‐up, and early interventions to prevent long‐term hearing loss. Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 134:5096–5102, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Sellar pathologies are frequently found on imaging performed to investigate headache. However, both headache and incidental sellar lesions are common. Hence, this study prospectively examined headache prevalence, phenotype, and severity in patients with sellar pathologies and the impact of transsphenoidal surgery on headache. Methods Patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of sellar lesions were consecutively recruited. At baseline, participants were defined as having headache or not and headache phenotype was characterized using validated questionnaires. Headache severity was assessed at baseline and 6 months postoperatively using the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) and Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS). Tumor characteristics were defined using radiological, histological, and endocrine factors. Primary outcomes included baseline headache prevalence and severity and headache severity change at 6 months postoperatively. Correlation between headache and radiological, histological, and endocrine characteristics was also of interest. Results Sixty participants (62% female, 47.1 ± 18.6 years) were recruited. Sixty-three percent possessed baseline headache. HIT-6 scores were higher in patients with primary headache risk factors, including younger age (R 2 = −0.417, p = 0.010), smoking history (63.31 ± 7.93 vs 54.44 ± 9.21, p = 0.0060), and family headache history (68.13 ± 7.01 vs 54.94 ± 9.11, p = 0.0030). Headaches were more common in patients with dural invasion (55.70 ± 12.14 vs 47.18 ± 10.15, p = 0.027) and sphenoid sinus invasion (58.87 ± 8.97 vs 51.29 ± 10.97, p = 0.007). Postoperative severity scores improved more with higher baseline headache severity (HIT-6: R 2 = −0.682, p < 0.001, MIDAS: R 2 = −0.880, p < 0.0010) and dural invasion (MIDAS: −53.00 ± 18.68 vs 12.00 ± 17.54, p = 0.0030). Conclusion Headaches in sellar disease are likely primary disorders triggered or exacerbated by sellar pathology. These may respond to surgery, particularly in patients with severe headache and dural invasion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]