1. There’s an App for That: Development of an Application to Operationalize the Global Diet Quality Score
- Author
-
Teresa T. Fung, Liseteli Ndiyoi, Sabri Bromage, Mika Matsuzaki, Yanping Li, Shilpa N Bhupathiraju, Sachit Thapa, Armen Danielyan, Analí Castellanos-Gutiérrez, Alexandra L. Bellows, Sheila Isanaka, Wafaie W. Fawzi, Marieke Vossenaar, Joanne E Arsenault, Walter C. Willett, Erick Angulo, Carolina Batis, Mourad Moursi, Nick Birk, Megan Deitchler, and Yuna He
- Subjects
data collection ,Waist ,Population ,Nutritional Status ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Beverages ,Food group ,AcademicSubjects/MED00060 ,sensitivity analysis ,Statistics ,medicine ,Humans ,Noncommunicable Diseases ,education ,Mexico ,Mathematics ,education.field_of_study ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,Data collection ,Operationalization ,Anthropometry ,Diet Records ,Diet ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Food ,Mental Recall ,AcademicSubjects/SCI00960 ,operationalization ,Metric (unit) ,GDQS ,Diet, Healthy ,medicine.symptom ,application ,Weight gain ,Software ,Supplement - Abstract
Background The global diet quality score (GDQS) is a simple, standardized metric appropriate for population-based measurement of diet quality globally. Objectives We aimed to operationalize data collection by modifying the quantity of consumption cutoffs originally developed for the GDQS food groups and to statistically evaluate the performance of the operationalized GDQS relative to the original GDQS against nutrient adequacy and noncommunicable disease (NCD)-related outcomes. Methods The GDQS application uses a 24-h open-recall to collect a full list of all foods consumed during the previous day or night, and automatically classifies them into corresponding GDQS food group. Respondents use a set of 10 cubes in a range of predetermined sizes to determine if the quantity consumed per GDQS food group was below, or equal to or above food group-specific cutoffs established in grams. Because there is only a total of 10 cubes but as many as 54 cutoffs for the GDQS food groups, the operationalized cutoffs differ slightly from the original GDQS cutoffs. Results A secondary analysis using 5 cross-sectional datasets comparing the GDQS with the original and operationalized cutoffs showed that the operationalized GDQS remained strongly correlated with nutrient adequacy and was equally sensitive to anthropometric and other clinical measures of NCD risk. In a secondary analysis of a longitudinal cohort study of Mexican teachers, there were no differences between the 2 modalities with the beta coefficients per 1 SD change in the original and operationalized GDQS scores being nearly identical for weight gain (-0.37 and -0.36, respectively, P
- Published
- 2021