Search

Background Ultrashort-echo-time (UTE) sequences have been developed to overcome technical limitations of pulmonary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recently, it has been shown that UTE sequences with breath-hold allow rapid image acquisition with sufficient image quality. However, patients with impaired respiration require alternative acquisition strategies while breathing freely. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of free-breathing three-dimensional (3D)-UTE sequences with different trajectories based on pulmonary imaging of immunocompromised patients. Material and Methods In a prospective study setting, two 3D-UTE sequences performed in free-breathing and exploiting non-Cartesian trajectories—one using a stack-of-spirals and the other exploiting a radial trajectory—were acquired at 3 T in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Two radiologists assessed the images regarding presence of pleural effusions and pulmonary infiltrations. Computed tomography (CT) was used as reference. Results A total of 28 datasets, each consisting of free-breathing 3D-UTE MRI with the two sequence techniques and a reference CT scan, were acquired in 20 patients. Interrater agreement was substantial for pulmonary infiltrations using both sequence techniques (κ = 0.77 − 0.78). Regarding pleural effusions, agreement was almost perfect in the stack-of-spirals (κ = 0.81) and moderate in the radial sequence (κ = 0.59). No significant differences in detectability of the assessed pulmonary pathologies were observed between both 3D-UTE sequence techniques ( P > 0.05), and their level of agreement was substantial throughout (κ = 0.62–0.81). Both techniques provided high sensitivities and specificities (79%–100%) for the detection of pulmonary infiltrations and pleural effusions compared to reference CT. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of the assessed 3D-UTE MRI sequences was similar. Both sequences enable the detection of typical inflammatory lung pathologies.

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)–targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) has already been applied to advanced blood cancers, such as multiple myeloma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We present a series of patients with advanced T-cell lymphoma (TCL) who were scheduled for CXCR4-directed therapy as a conditioning regimen, followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods: Four patients with advanced, heavily pretreated, and relapsed TCL (2 men, 2 women; median age, 50 y) without suitable alternative therapeutic options underwent CXCR4-directed PET and pretherapeutic dosimetry. We then conducted CXCR4-targeted RLT in combination with allogeneic (3/4, 75%) or autologous (1/4, 25%) HSCT. One patient also underwent radioimmunotherapy targeting CD66 to enhance therapeutic efficacy. We investigated safety, best response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Pretherapeutic dosimetry indicated lymphoma-absorbed doses of up to 33.2 Gy from CXCR4-targeted RLT. Except for 1 patient who developed tumor lysis syndrome along with transient grade 3 kidney failure, no acute toxicity, allergic reactions, or other adverse events were recorded during therapy. One patient developed septicemia and subsequently died 16 d after RLT, whereas engraftment was achieved in the remaining 3 patients (75%). During follow-up, a partial response was recorded in 1 of 3 patients (33.3%) and a complete metabolic response in the other two (66.7%, with 1 patient also receiving additional radioimmunotherapy). Median progression-free survival was 7 mo (range, 4–25 mo). After a median follow-up of 54 mo (range, 4–56 mo), 3 patients were still alive at the date of censoring. Conclusion: For advanced, heavily pretreated TCL, CXCR4-directed RLT may serve as an effective conditioning therapy before HSCT and can cause substantial antilymphoma activity, leading to a remarkable response in selected cases.

Histomorpholgy is one of the mainstays of acute Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) diagnosis. However, concerns about reproducibility and the most appropriate grading system question its usefulness. Our aim was to assess histomorphological parameters and previously reported grading systems for GvHD regarding reproducibility and validity. Moreover, we propose that sum scores, derived by combining separately scored morphological parameters into a total score, might provide a simplified but equally effective means to grade GvHD. A total of 123 colon biopsies were assessed across four pathologists for intestinal GvHD using a Round-Robin test and results were correlated with clinical findings. Interobserver reproducibility was high for histological parameters that were evaluated as indicators of acute GvHD. Published grading systems were moderately reproducible (ICC 0.679–0.769) while simplified sum scores, in comparison, showed better interrater reliability (ICC 0.818–0.896). All grading systems and sum scores were associated with clinical signs of GvHD and in part with therapy response and survival. However, they were not able to stratify patients according to the clinical severity of GvHD. In a hot-spot analysis 1 crypt apoptotic body (CAB) in 10 crypts was a reasonable cut-off value for minimal diagnostic criteria of GvHD. In conclusion, histology can contribute to the diagnosis of GvHD and is reproducible. Published grading systems are able to reflect clinical findings as are simplified sum scores, which showed improved reproducibility and might be easier to handle as they are based on adding up histological parameters rather than transferring histological findings into a separate grading system. Sum scores will have to be further tested in a prospective setting.

Immunogenetic association studies may give rise to new hypotheses on the immune surveillance of cancer. We hypothesized that certain combinations of Killer-cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor (KIR) and HLA genotypes may enhance Natural Killer (NK)-cell immunity against nascent acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and thereby lead to a skewed genotype distribution among patients. For this purpose, we analyzed KIR and HLA genotypes of 1767 German patients with AML and compared the results to data of 51 890 German volunteers who had registered with DKMS. Patient samples were retrieved from the Collaborative Biobank (CoBi) and the Biorepository of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL). All samples were genotyped with high-resolution amplicon-based next-generation sequencing. Owing to the large number of controls this study was very sensitive to detect an impact of KIR genotype. Knowledge on KIRs and their cognate HLA ligands allowed for testing of several hypotheses of NK-cell mediated endogenous leukemia surveillance. We did not find significant differences between the two cohorts regarding presence or absence of single KIR genes. When grouped by telomeric or centromeric gene content, the major haplotypes A/A, A/B, and B/B were equally distributed among patients and controls. Using information on KIRs and their HLA ligands, we further tested receptor-ligand models and summation models without revealing markedly significant differences between patients and controls, albeit we observed a trend pointing at a minor protective effect of a low number of inhibitory KIR/KIR-ligand pairs. The results suggest that the KIR/KIR-ligand genotype has no effect on the susceptibility for the development of de novo AML.

Higher doses of cytarabine appear to improve long-term outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in particular for younger patients. To this end, the optimal dosage of single agent cytarabine in consolidation therapy remains elusive. Here, we assessed the impact of different dosages of cytarabine consolidation after 7 + 3 induction on outcome in a large real-world data set from the German Study Alliance Leukemia-Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SAL-AML) registry. Patients below 65 years of age, registered between April 2005 and September 2020, who attained complete remission after intensive induction and received at least one consolidation cycle with intermediate (IDAC) or high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) were selected. To account for differences in patient and disease characteristics between both groups, the average treatment effect was estimated by propensity score weighting. Six-hundred-forty-two patients received HiDAC consolidation with median dosage of median 17.6 (IQR, 16.5–18.0) g/m² for a median number of 3 cycles (IQR, 2–3), whereas 178 patients received IDAC consolidation with 5.9 (IQR, 5.7–8.6) g/m² for a median of 2 cycles (IQR, 1–3). Both groups differed significantly in some important characteristics (age, sex, cytogenetic risk group, ECOG performance status, disease status, HCT-CI, number of induction cycles). After propensity score weighting for differences in patient and disease characteristics, relapse-free survival after 2 years was comparable between HiDAC-treated (55.3%) and IDAC-treated (55.6%) patients. Moreover, no significant differences in overall survival were observed after 2 years (84.7 vs. 80.6%). Notably, more patients treated with IDAC received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in first remission (37.6 vs. 19.8%, p

Beyond being a key factor for tumor growth and metastasis in human cancer, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is also highly expressed by a number of immune cells, allowing for non-invasive read-out of inflammatory activity. With two recent studies reporting on prognostic implications of the spleen signal in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias, the aim of this study was to correlate splenic

ZusammenfassungDie konstitutive Aktivierung des JAK-STAT-Signalwegs ist charakteristisch für die Pathogenese der myeloproliferativen Neoplasien, speziell der primären Myelofibrose, der Polycythaemia vera und der essentiellen Thrombozythämie. Die Einführung von oral verfügbaren JAK-Inhibitoren in die Klinik brachte einen entscheidenden Fortschritt für die pharmakologische Behandlung der Myelofibrose und der Polycythaemia vera, wenngleich damit noch keine Heilung verbunden ist. Im Vordergrund steht die Verbesserung der Lebensqualität der meist älteren Patienten durch Kontrolle krankheitsbedingter konstitutioneller Symptome, Reduktion einer bestehenden Splenomegalie und Vermeidung insbesondere von thromboembolischen Folgekomplikationen. Darüber hinaus kann die Therapie von Myelofibrose-Patienten mit JAK-Inhibitoren jedoch auch deren Krankheitsverlauf verlangsamen und ihr Gesamtüberleben verlängern. Der bislang einzige in Europa zugelassene JAK-Inhibitor Ruxolitinib hemmt die Isoformen JAK1 und JAK2 und besitzt sowohl antiinflammatorisches als auch antiproliferatives Potenzial. Damit zeigt dieser Inhibitor überdies eine gute Wirkung in der Therapie der Graft-versus-Host-Erkrankung nach allogener hämatopoetischer Stammzelltransplantation. Mit Fedratinib, Pacritinib und Momelatinib befinden sich derzeit 3 weitere vielversprechende JAK-Inhibitoren mit etwas unterschiedlichen Wirkprofilen in der klinischen Phase III-Testung. Diese zeigen auch bei Patienten mit unwirksamer oder unverträglicher Vorbehandlung mit Ruxolitinib Wirksamkeit, sodass eine kontinuierliche Weiterentwicklung der entsprechenden Therapiestrategien abzusehen ist.

We used a rigorous PRoBE (prospective-specimen collection, retrospective-blinded-evaluation) study design to compare the ability of biomarkers of systemic inflammation and biomarkers of gastrointestinal (GI) tissue damage to predict response to corticosteroid treatment, the incidence of clinically severe disease, 6-month nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We prospectively collected serum samples of newly diagnosed GVHD patients (n = 730) from 19 centers, divided them into training (n = 352) and validation (n = 378) cohorts, and measured TNFR1, TIM3, IL6, ST2, and REG3α via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Performances of the 4 strongest algorithms from the training cohort (TNFR1 + TIM3, TNFR1 + ST2, TNFR1 + REG3α, and ST2 + REG3α) were evaluated in the validation cohort. The algorithm that included only biomarkers of systemic inflammation (TNFR1 + TIM3) had a significantly smaller area under the curve (AUC; 0.57) than the AUCs of algorithms that contained ≥1 GI damage biomarker (TNFR1 + ST2, 0.70; TNFR1 + REG3α, 0.73; ST2 + REG3α, 0.79; all P < .001). All 4 algorithms were able to predict short-term outcomes such as response to systemic corticosteroids and severe GVHD, but the inclusion of a GI damage biomarker was needed to predict long-term outcomes such as 6-month NRM and survival. The algorithm that included 2 GI damage biomarkers was the most accurate of the 4 algorithms for all endpoints.

Background: Trisomy 4 is a recurrent but rare cytogenetic abnormality reported in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The prognostic significance of this abnormality in AML patients is not clear. Prognosis of AML patients with trisomy 4 seems to be poor as compared to that of patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) may improve survival if applied early in first complete remission (CR). However, neither prospective clinical nor larger retrospective cohort studies are available to support these results from small series. Aims: To characterize AML patients with trisomy 4 and compare outcomes according to different treatment strategies. Methods: We retrospectively studied 123 AML patients with trisomy 4 (median age at diagnosis, 58 years; range, 16-76 years) treated between 2000 and 2019 within 2 large study groups. Standard statistical methods were applied. Results: Median white blood cell count at diagnosis was 4.8/nl (range, 0.4-255/nl) and platelets 46/nl (range, 2-330/nl). Type of AML was de novo in 97 (79%), secondary after myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm in 18 (15%), and therapy-related in 8 (6%) patients. Sixty-two (50%) patients were female. Cytogenetic analysis revealed trisomy 4 as the sole abnormality in 28 (23%), additional abnormalities in 95 (77%) patients, most frequently ≥3 (n=66) abnormalities, trisomy 8 (n=41), karyotypes characterized by trisomies only (n=21) and t(8;21) or inv(16) (CBF; n=10). A total of 98 patients (80%) had NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutation testing. Of those, 21 (21%) and 15 (15%) harbored NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations. Only 2 (3%) of 72 patients were CEBPA double mutated. Data on response to intensive anthracycline-based induction therapy were available in 117 patients. Early death rate was 5% (n=6). CR was achieved in 68% (n=79) with 22 (19%) requiring an intensive salvage treatment cycle. Notably, patients with trisomy 4 as sole abnormality had a CR rate of 89% (n=25/28). There was no difference in the CR rate in FLT3-ITD positive (n=10/15) as compared to FLT3 wild type (n=56/83) patients (67% each, P=0.99). Univariable analysis revealed trisomy 4 as sole abnormality (OR, 5.76; P=0.007) and NPM1 (OR, 12.08; P=0.02) as favorable factors. An allo-HCT was performed in 40 (34%) patients, of whom 19 patients were transplanted in first CR after induction therapy. Nine patients achieved CR after salvage chemotherapy and went on to allo-HCT; another 12 patients received allo-HCT with active disease. Type of donor was matched-related in 8, matched-unrelated in 30, and unknown in 2 of the 40 patients, respectively. Median follow-up of the intensively treated cohort was 73 months (95%-CI, 36-91 months). Five-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 31% (95%-CI, 23-42%) and 27% (95%-CI, 18-42%). OS rates were significantly higher in patients with CBF leukemia or patients with trisomy 4 as compared to all other abnormalities (Figure 1; P Conclusions: Clinically, patients with trisomy 4 are very heterogeneous in particular with respect to cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. In our cohort, patients with trisomy 4 as a sole abnormality had a high CR rate and favorable clinical outcome. In the total cohort, allo-HCT did not improve RFS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Haenel: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Crysandt: Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fransecky: Medac: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Martinez-Lopez: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Platzbecker: AbbVie: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Baldus: Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Müller-Tidow: Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding. Levis: Astellas and FujiFilm: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, FujiFilm, and Menarini: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Montesinos: Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Röllig: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schlenk: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Hexal: Honoraria; Neovio Biotech: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding.

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is an attractive target for cancer diagnosis and treatment, as it is overexpressed in many solid and hematological malignancies. This study investigated the feasibility of CXCR4-directed imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using 68Ga-Pentixafor to visualize and quantify disease involvement in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Methods: 12 patients with MPNs (n = 4 primary myelofibrosis, n = 6 essential thrombocythemia, n = 2 polycythemia vera) and 5 controls underwent 68Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT. Imaging findings were compared with immunohistochemical stainings, laboratory data and splenic volume. Results:68Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT was visually positive in 12/12 patients and CXCR4 target specificity could be confirmed by immunohistochemical staining. A significantly higher tracer uptake could be detected in the bone marrow of MPN patients (SUVmean 6.45±2.34 vs. 4.44±1.24). Dynamic changes of CXCR4 expression determined by 68Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT corresponded with treatment response. Conclusion:68Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT represents a novel diagnostic tool to non-invasively detect and quantify the extent of disease involvement in MPNs.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an attractive entity for the development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy because AML blasts are susceptible to T-cell–mediated elimination. Here, we introduce sialic acid–binding immunoglobulin-like lectin 6 (Siglec-6) as a novel target for CAR T cells in AML. We designed a Siglec-6–specific CAR with a targeting domain derived from the human monoclonal antibody JML-1. We found that Siglec-6 is commonly expressed on AML cell lines and primary AML blasts, including the subpopulation of AML stem cells. Treatment with Siglec-6 CAR T cells confers specific antileukemia reactivity that correlates with Siglec-6 expression in preclinical models, including induction of complete remission in a xenograft AML model in immunodeficient mice (NSG/U937). In addition, we confirmed Siglec-6 expression on transformed B cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and specific anti-CLL reactivity of Siglec-6 CAR T cells in vitro. Of particular interest, we found that Siglec-6 is not detectable on normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and that treatment with Siglec-6 CAR T cells does not affect their viability and lineage differentiation in colony-formation assays. These data suggest that Siglec-6 CAR T-cell therapy may be used to effectively treat AML without the need for subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In mature normal hematopoietic cells, we detected Siglec-6 in a proportion of memory (and naïve) B cells and basophilic granulocytes, suggesting the potential for limited on-target/off-tumor reactivity. The lack of expression of Siglec-6 on normal HSPCs is a key to differentiating it from other Siglec family members (eg, Siglec-3 [CD33]) and other CAR target antigens (eg, CD123) that are under investigation in AML, and it warrants the clinical investigation of Siglec-6 CAR T-cell therapy.

Recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) are at high risk for contracting infectious diseases with high morbidity and mortality. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral respiratory disease that can lead to severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome, with a potentially fatal outcome. In this retrospective study conducted on behalf of the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group, we aimed to analyze risk factors, disease course, and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients who underwent alloSCT. AlloSCT recipients who became infected with SARS-CoV-2 at German and Austrian transplant centers between February 2020 and July 2021 were included. Classification of COVID-19 severity into mild, moderate-severe, or critical disease and division of the course of the pandemic into 4 phases were done according to the German Robert Koch Institute. The main endpoint was overall mortality at the end of follow-up. We further analyzed the need for treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU) and the severity of disease. Risk factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses, and survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. The study cohort comprised 130 patients from 14 transplant centers, with a median age at diagnosis of COVID-19 of 59 years (range, 20 to 81 years) and a median interval between alloSCT and COVID-19 of 787 days (range, 19 to 8138 days). The most common underlying diseases were acute myeloid leukemia (45.4%) and lymphoma (10.8%). The majority of patients (84.9%) were infected in the later phases of the pandemic; 20.8% had moderate-severe disease, 12.3% had critical disease, and 19.2% were treated in an ICU. After a median follow-up of 127 days, overall mortality was 16.2%, 52.0% among patients treated in an ICU. Risk factors for mortality in multivariate analysis were active disease (odds ratio [OR], 4.46), infection with SARS-CoV-2 ≤365 days after alloSCT (OR, 5.60), age60 years (OR, 5.39), and ongoing immunosuppression with cyclosporine (OR, 8.55). Risk factors for developing moderate-severe or critical disease were concurrent immunosuppression (OR, 4.06) and age40 years (OR, 4.08). Patients after alloSCT exhibit a substantially increased mortality risk after COVID-19 infection compared with the normal population, without considerable improvement over the course of the pandemic. Risk factors include age, early infection post-alloSCT, and active immunosuppression. Further studies are needed to improve prevention and treatment in this high-risk patient group.

The chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), which is overexpressed in many solid and hematologic malignancies, can be targeted for radiopeptide therapy via the antagonist pentixather. The biokinetics and dosimetry of

Background Venetoclax (VEN)-based combination therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMA) has been approved for first-line treatment in patients ineligible for intensive treatment based on two randomized trials. There is some evidence for efficacy also in the in relapsed/ refractory setting (R/R), but comparative controlled data is lacking. Here, we report our experience of VEN-Azacitidine (AZA) in R/R AML salvage treatment and bridge to allogeneic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in fit patients compared to historical data from the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03188874). Design/Methods We analyzed all patients with R/R AML after initial intensive therapy, who started VEN-AZA salvage treatment at the University Hospital Heidelberg, between October 2018 and October 2020. Patients, who were bridged to allo-HCT were compared in a multivariable analysis to data of R/R AML patients from the SAL registry receiving an allo-HCT. Results: A total of 26 patients (median age 60 years, range 23 to 79) were included. All patients initially received intensive therapy, 16 patients (62%) had been refractory to intensive induction therapy with DA (daunorubicin, cytarabine) (11 patients)/ CPX-351 (2 patients) or to an intensive salvage therapy regime with HAM (2 patients)/ Cytarabin-Bortezomib (1 patient). Ten patients (38%) had morphologic (7 patients) or molecular relapse (3 patients) after intensive first line therapy. The distribution of AML according to WHO-2016 classification was n=10 recurrent genetic abnormalities (n= 7, mutated NPM1; n=1, biallelic CEBPA mutations; n=1, mutated RUNX1; n=1, CBFB-MYH11), n=10 AML with MRC, n=6 AML NOS. According to the 2017 ELN classification, 9 patients (34,5%) had low risk, 8 (31%) intermediate risk and 9 (34,5%) adverse risk disease. All patients received AZA 75mg/m² for 7 days combined with VEN 400mg/day after initial ramp up or a reduced dose of 100mg/day in case of co-medication with azoles in 28 days cycles. Best response was CR/CRi in 58% (n=15), PR in 23% (n=6) patients. Day 30-mortality was 0%, day 60-mortality was 4% (n=1). Allo-HCT was performed in 20 patients (77%). Pre-Allo-HCT remission status was CR/CRi in 11 (55%), PR in 4 (20%) patients and MLFS in 1 patient and 4 patients had active disease (n=3, relapse after achieving CR/CRi on VEN-AZA, n=1 refractory to VEN-AZA.). At the time of analysis 15 (75%) of the 20 bridged patients were alive and 11 (55%) are still in CR resulting in a median relapse-free survival in bridged patients of 406 days, whereas all patients not proceeding to allo-HCT died after a median of 139 days. In total, 63 patients with R/R AML were identified in the SAL-registry proceeding to allo-HCT with non VEN-based salvage attempt. Pre-Allo-HCT remission status was CR/CRi in 18 (28%), PR in 15 (24%), unknown in 13 patients (21%) and 17 (27%) patients had active disease (n=9 relapsed, n=8 refractory). Patients of the SAL registry were younger (median, 55 years; range, 22-75 years) and more patients were ELN-int (low risk, 32%, n=20; int, 52%, n=33, adv, 16%, n=10). Median follow-up in the VEN-AZA and the SAL cohorts were 1.4 years and 4.6 years, respectively. Cox-regression modeling of survival measured from the date of being refractory/relapsed revealed a non-significant effect of the cohorts favoring the VEN-AZA salvage therapy (HR, 0.87, p=0.73). However, stratified univariable survival analysis revealed in trend better survival (p=0.10) in the VEN-AZA compared to the SAL cohort with 77% (95%-CI, 62-95%) and 74% (95%-CI, 57-97%) as well as 84% (95%-CI, 76-94%) and 52% (95-CI, 41-68%) 1- and 2-years survival, respectively. Conclusion: Our data confirms the efficacy of VEN-AZA in patients with R/R AML and underlines its potential as an effective strategy for bridging to successful allo-HCT. Disclosures Unglaub: JazzPharma: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee. Schlenk: Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Neovio Biotech: Honoraria; Hexal: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria. Middeke: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Glycostem: Consultancy; UCB: Honoraria. Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Haenel: GSK: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Crysandt: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria. Fransecky: Medac: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Seggewiss-Bernhardt: Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ipsen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EusaPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker: AbbVie: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Baldus: Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Dreger: Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Müller-Tidow: Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding. Sauer: Takeda: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Matterhorn Biosciences AG: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: off-label use of Venetoclax-based combination therapy in relapsed or refractory AML

Personalized dosing of kinase inhibitors (KI) might be beneficial in oral anti-cancer therapy to overcome individual pharmacokinetic variability. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) has emerged as an attractive alternative compared to conventional invasive sampling methods enabling remote and frequent specimen collection. Therefore, an LC-MS/MS VAMS method was developed and validated to monitor drug exposure of ten KI from 20 µL dried capillary blood. The assay includes the KI cabozantinib, dabrafenib, nilotinib, and osimertinib with a calibration range of 6-1500 ng/mL and afatinib, axitinib, bosutinib, lenvatinib, ruxolitinib and trametinib within a range of 2-500 ng/mL. Using acetonitrile containing isotope labelled internal standards (IS) as solid-liquid extraction solvent, analytes and IS were detected by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) after electro-spray ionization (ESI) in positive ionization mode after chromatographic separation using a phenyl-hexyl column. The method was validated according to the FDA and EMA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation and in accordance with the guideline of the International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology for dried blood spot-based methods. The calibration model was linear and reproducible for all KI (R

We compared the feasibility of 4 cytomegalovirus (CMV)- and Aspergillus-reactive T-cell immunoassay protocols in allogenic stem cell transplant recipients. While enzyme-linked immunospot performed best overall, logistically advantageous whole blood–based assays performed comparably in patients with less severe lymphocytopenia. CMV-induced interferon-gamma responses correlated strongly across all protocols and showed high concordance with serology.

B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a target for various immunotherapies and a biomarker for tumor load in multiple myeloma (MM). We report a case of irreversible BCMA loss in a patient with MM who was enrolled in the KarMMa trial ( NCT03361748 ) and progressed after anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy. We identified selection of a clone with homozygous deletion of TNFRSF17 (BCMA) as the underlying mechanism of immune escape. Furthermore, we found heterozygous TNFRSF17 loss or monosomy 16 in 37 out of 168 patients with MM, including 28 out of 33 patients with hyperhaploid MM who had not been previously treated with BCMA-targeting therapies, suggesting that heterozygous TNFRSF17 deletion at baseline could theoretically be a risk factor for BCMA loss after immunotherapy. Biallelic loss of BCMA caused a patient with multiple myeloma to relapse after anti-BCMA CAR T cell treatment. Baseline heterozygous BCMA deletions might be a risk factor for this form of resistance.

A simple, rapid, cost-effective and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method with diode array detection was developed and validated for the quantification of letermovir, a compound approved for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in adult recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Sorafenib was used as internal standard. Samples were pre-treated by liquid–liquid extraction with tert-butyl methylether. Separation was achieved on a XTerra® RP18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 5 µm) at 30 °C using gradient elution with a mobile phase of 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate pH 7.9 (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile:20 mM ammonium bicarbonate (9:1 v/v) (mobile phase B). Samples were eluted at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min throughout the 20-min run. UV wavelength mode was used, letermovir and sorafenib were monitored at 260 nm. The calibration curve was linear in a concentration range of 25–5000 ng/mL with correlation coefficients ≥ 0.99. Intra-day and inter-day accuracy expressed as relative error were −11.4–20% and −7.96–10.62%, respectively. Precision expressed as coefficient of variation was 1.44–3.15% (intra-day) and 1.17–1.93% (inter-day). The method was successfully applied for analysis of 128 letermovir levels demonstrating its usefulness for letermovir monitoring in routine clinical practice.

Introduction The CD200/CD200 receptor (CD200R) axis is known to exert immunoregulatory effects in myeloid-derived cells and constitutes a putative immune checkpoint in hematological malignancies, in which CD200 expression is associated with poor prognosis. In multiple myeloma (MM), CD200 is expressed in the majority of patient-derived primary cells. However, its functional importance as well as the related downstream mechanism upon CD200 ligand binding to its CD200R on T cells are not well understood. In this study, we analyze the functional role of CD200 as a potential immune checkpoint in MM and decipher the mechanism of CD200-mediated immune escape. Methods Primary MM cells and MM cell lines were analyzed for CD200 surface expression by flow cytometry. To overexpress CD200 on non-expressing MM cell lines we used a Sleeping Beauty transposon vector system. CD200+/- MM cell lines L363, U266 and MM.1s were co-cultured with CD3/CD28-activated healthy donor T cells. T cell-mediated cytotoxicity in these co-cultures was assessed with flow cytometry and/or luciferase assay. Moreover, to analyze the effects of CD200R activation on downstream signaling pathways, activated T cells were treated with recombinant human CD200 (rhCD200) and/or anti-CD200 blocking antibody and subsequently, Western blotting was performed. Results Of n=120 primary MM samples (n=120) analyzed, CD200 protein expression could be detected in ca. 75 % of the cases. In contrast, all n=9 MM cell lines tested neither displayed surface nor cytoplasmic CD200 expression. Therefore, using a Sleeping Beauty transposon vector system we stably expressed CD200 on MM cell lines for further analyses. In the presence of CD200-expressing MM cells up to 50% decrease in CD3+ T cell-mediated cytotoxicity against MM cells was observed in flow cytometry and luciferase assay. Proliferation rates of MM cell lines remained unchanged regardless of the level of CD200 overexpression as determined by Alamar blue assays. In myeloid-derived cells, CD200R directly interacts with docking protein-2 (DOK2). In activated T cells, we observed DOK2 phosphorylation upon CD200 binding when treated with rhCD200 in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Applying an anti-CD200 blocking antibody, this effect could be reversed, thus revealing a possible mechanism for the observed attenuation of T cell function. Conclusion Our study shows that anti-MM cytotoxicity from primary healthy donor CD3+ T cells is attenuated by CD200 expression on MM cells. We also demonstrate that this inhibitory mechanism in CD3+ T cells is mediated via DOK2, providing a potential target for immunotherapeutic approaches in MM. Disclosures Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by a high relapse rate, indicating insufficient clearance of leukemia-initiating cells. Depending on genetic risk stratification, consolidating chemotherapy proves to significantly reduce the risk of relapse. In particular, in younger AML patients higher dosage of cytarabine appears to improve long-term outcome, while there is no apparent benefit of multiagent combination, compared to cytarabine monotherapy. However, to this end the optimal dosage of single agent cytarabine in consolidation therapy after 7+3 remission induction remains elusive. Methods: Here, we retrospectively assessed the impact of different dosages of cytarabine consolidation on outcome in a large real-world data set from the German Study Alliance Leukemia-Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SAL-AML) registry. Patients below 65 years of age, registered between April 2005 and September 2020 with non-acute promyelocytic leukemia, who attained complete remission after intensive induction and received at least one consolidation cycle with intermediate (IDAC) or high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) were selected. To account for differences in patient and disease characteristics between both groups, the average treatment effect was estimated by propensity score weighting. Results: 642 patients received HiDAC consolidation with a median dosage of 5794.88 (IQR, 4745.48-5971.56) mg/m 2/d with a median number of 3 cycles (IQR, 2-3), whereas 178 patients received IDAC consolidation with 1946.16 (IQR, 1869.51-2469.15) mg/m 2/d with a median of 2 cycles (IQR, 1-3). IDAC-treated patients showed in average a higher age (median (IQR) 58.5 (49-62) years vs. 50 (41-56) years) and more comorbidities with 43.8% having an HCT-CI score of 2-4, compared to 22.3% among HiDAC-treated patients. Alongside, significantly more secondary (5.1% vs. 3.1%) and therapy-related (12.4% vs. 4.1%) AML as well as more adverse (14.5% vs. 6.5%) and less favorable (40.6% vs. 56%) genetic risk features according to ELN 2017 risk classification were found among IDAC-treated patients. After propensity score weighting for differences in patient and disease characteristics, overall survival after 5 years was comparable between HiDAC-treated (71.1 %) and IDAC-treated (67.7%) patients. Moreover, no significant differences in relapse-free survival were observed after 5 years (47.4 vs. 45.2%). Notably, more patients treated with IDAC received allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission (37.6 vs. 19.8%) while significantly more HiDAC-treated patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapse (30.8 vs. 20.2%). Censoring for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission revealed no significant survival difference with regard to cytarabine dosage. Considering only ELN favorable risk AML patients, there was no difference in 5-years overall (80.5% vs. 83.9%) nor relapse-free (57.7% vs. 56.8%) survival. Of note, significantly more patients treated with HiDAC suffered from ≥3 CTCAE infectious complications (56.7 vs. 44.1%), which was more striking in patients above 50 years of age. The rate of other ≥3 CTCAE non-hematological toxicities and secondary malignancies was comparable in both treatment groups. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests no significant benefit of high dose cytarabine compared to intermediate dosages in consolidation for AML patients under 65 years of age, independent of ELN risk group. Disclosures Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Haenel: Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Brummendorf: Takepart Media: Honoraria; Repeat Diagnostics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers: Research Funding. Fransecky: Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Held: MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Acortech Biopharma: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Baldus: Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Mueller-Tidow: Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematologic malignancy that is treated in medically fit patients with intensive induction chemotherapy (IT) and postremission therapy to achieve a complete and long-term remission. The incidence of obesity in the general population is steadily increasing and has been identified as a major risk factor for all-cause mortality. Despite previous studies assessing the role of obesity in AML patients undergoing IT, there is an ongoing debate on the impact of obesity on patient outcome as well as the optimal dosing strategy in obese AML patients. We conducted a retrospective registry study assessing 1677 AML patients who were treated with IT for newly diagnosed AML. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) while event-free survival (EFS), the rate of first complete remission (CR1), relapse/refractory disease and non-relapse/refractory-related mortality (NRRrM), treatment-related toxicities, patient comorbidities and chemotherapy dosing strategies were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Obese patients (body mass index, BMI ≥ 30) displayed a significant inferior median OS (29.44 vs. 47.94 months, p = 0.015) without a significant difference in median EFS (7.8 vs. 9.89 months, p = 0.3) compared to non-obese patients (BMI < 30). The cumulative incidence (CI) of NRRrM was significantly increased in obese patients compared to non-obese patients while no differences could be observed regarding the CI of relapsed or refractory disease. Obesity was identified as an independent risk factor for death (HR 1.27, [95% CI 1.07-1.51], p = 0.005) in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. When the cohort was stratified by age (≥/< 60 years), the difference in OS as well as the significantly increased CI of NRRrM was only observed in patients ≥ 60 years. Notably, obese patients demonstrated higher rates of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities regardless of their age. No disparities for OS, EFS, CR1 rate or treatment-related toxicities were observed when the entire study population was stratified for the used dosing strategy (dose calculation using total body weight, idealized body weight, adjusted idealized body weight or capped at body surface area of 2 m 2). In conclusion, the present study identifies obesity as a major independent risk factor for worse overall survival and increased CI of non-relapse/refractory-related mortality in older (≥60 years) AML patients undergoing curative IT. These findings may be most likely attributed to obesity related comorbidities and not to dose adaption of chemotherapy in obese AML patients. Disclosures Schliemann: Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Haenel: Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Fransecky: Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Burchert: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Crysandt: Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Müller-Tidow: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Platzbecker: Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria. Baldus: Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria.

Background In a recent phase-III trial CPX-351 (Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA), a liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin, has shown higher remission rates and longer overall survival (OS) in patients aged 60 to 75 years with AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) or therapy-related AML (t-AML) in comparison to conventional 7+3 regimen. Based on this CPX-351 has been approved in the USA 2017 and in Europe 2018 for adult patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML. Still, several issues such as age ( Design/Methods: For this retrospective analysis, we collected data on baseline characteristics, treatment details including allo-HCT and outcome from patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML, who were treated with CPX-351 according to the EMA label between 2018 and 2020 in 25 German centers participating in the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL), German Cooperative Transplant Study Group and the AML Study Group (AMLSG). Results: A total of 188 patients (median age 65 years, range 26 to 80) with t-AML (29%) or AML-MRC (70%) including 46 patients (24%) Conclusion: The results from this real-world analysis confirm CPX-351 as an efficient treatment for these high-risk AML patients bridging to facilitating allo-HCT in many patients with encouraging outcome after transplantation. Disclosures Röllig: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gaidzik: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Unglaub: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee; JazzPharma: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee. Thol: Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Haenel: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy. Vucinic: Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; MSD: Honoraria. Fransecky: Novartis: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Holtick: Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Kobbe: Celgene: Research Funding. Holderried: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Therakos: Other: Travel support; Janssen: Other: Travel support; Abbvie: Other: Travel support; Eurocept Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; Medac: Other: Travel support. Heuser: Astellas: Research Funding; Bayer AG: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BergenBio: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tolremo: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Sauer: Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Matterhorn Biosciences AG: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member. Goetze: Abbvie: Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios and Astex: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Helsinn: Honoraria; GEMoaB: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Berlin-Chemie: Honoraria; Oxford Biomedica: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Schetelig: Roche: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; BMS: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees . Germing: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: advisory activity, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Schroeder: JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding.

The chemokine receptor CXCR4, which is overexpressed in many solid and hematologic malignancies, can be targeted for radiopeptide therapy via the antagonist Pentixather®. Biokinetics and dosimetry of 177Lu-Pentixather and 90Y-Pentixather were analyzed. Methods: This retrospective study is a standardized reevaluation of data collected for treatment planning. Nineteen patients with complete sets of planar whole-body scans over at least four days and a single SPECT/CT after 200 MBq 177Lu-Pentixather were included. Kinetics were measured in the whole body, in tissues with activity retention, and in 10 individuals in the blood. Time-integrated activity coefficients and tissue absorbed doses were derived. Results: Increased uptake of Pentixather was observed in kidneys, liver, spleen, and bone marrow, inducing median (minimum-maximum) absorbed doses of 0.91 (0.38-3.47), 0.71 (0.39-1.17), 0.58 (0.34-2.26), and 0.47 (0.14-2.33) Gy per GBq 177Lu-Pentixather and 3.75 (1.48-12.2), 1.61 (1.14-2.97), 1.66 (0.97-6.69), and 1.06 (0.27-4.45) Gy per GBq 90Y-Pentixather, respectively. In most tissues, activity increased during the first day after the administration of 177Lu-Pentixather and afterwards decayed with mean effective half-lives of 41 ± 10 (range: 24-64) hours in kidneys and median half-lives of 109, 86, and 92 hours in liver, spleen, and bone marrow, respectively. Maximum uptake per kidney was 2.2% ± 1.0% (range: 0.6%-5.1%). In organs showing no specific uptake, absorbed doses exceeding 0.3 Gy per GBq 90Y-Pentixather are estimated for the urinary bladder and for tissues adjacent to accumulating organs such as the adrenal glands, bone surface, and gallbladder. Dose estimates for tumors and extramedullary lesions ranged from 1.5 to 18.2 Gy per GBq 90Y-Pentixather. Conclusion: In patients with hematologic neoplasms, absorbed doses calculated for bone marrow and extramedullary lesions are sufficient to be effective as an adjunct to high-dose chemotherapies prior to stem cell transplantation.

Background: Conventional CAR-T cells targeting CD123 in rrAML have achieved objective responses, but led to long-lasting myelosuppression due to expression of CD123 on progenitor cells. UniCAR-T-CD123 is a rapidly switchable two-component CAR-T therapy. An inert universal CAR-T cell (UniCAR-T) is combined with a CD123-specific soluble targeting module with a short half-life (TM123). By administering or withholding the continuous infusion of TM123, the UniCAR-T-cell can be rapidly switched on and off. Within the ongoing Phase IA study in rrAML, we investigated the expansion kinetics of UniCAR-T cells during TM123 administration in peripheral blood and bone marrow as well as cytokine profiles of treated patients. Methods: Prior to administration of autologous UniCAR-T cells, patients received a standard Flu/Cy lymphodepletion regimen at day -5 to -3. TM123 was administered as continuous infusion over 24 days starting at day 0. At day 1 a single dose of UniCAR-T cells was given. Dosing started with 1 x 108 UniCAR-T cells and 0.5 mg TM123 per day in patient 1. Patient 2 received the same TM123 dose and a UniCAR-T dose of 2.5 x 108 cells. Patient 3 received the same cell dose as patient 2 but a higher TM123 dose (1 mg/day). Pharmacokinetic of UniCAR-T and TM123 was determined from peripheral blood and bone marrow by droplet digital PCR and TM123-specific ELISA, respectively. Cytokine levels were measured by microfluidic immunoassay. Results: All 3 patients treated so far achieved an objective response, with one showing a PR and two a CRi. Treatment proved to be tolerable, no DLTs were observed to date and adverse events were mild. Grade 1 CRS (fever) was observed in 2 patients but subsided within 48 h after use of antipyretics. Myelosuppression was observed starting after lymphodepletion, which immediately recovered after TM123 withdrawal on day 24 in all patients, providing evidence for the rapid off-switch of UniCAR-T cells post TM123 administration. UniCAR-T cells expanded in all patients in peripheral blood and bone marrow comparable to data reported for conventional CD123 CAR-T products, and were so far detectable for up to 6 months after administration. Expansion kinetics were TM123-dependent. Patients showed periods of transient increase of IL-6, IFN-γ and TNF-α levels preceding peak expansion and decreasing after termination of TM123 administration. One patient showed additional coinciding momentary elevation of GM-CSF and IL-2. Conclusions: The initial clinical and translational results of UniCAR-T-CD123 represent, to our understanding, a first time evidence for a well-tolerated and effective rapidly switchable CAR-T product. Even though the number of patients treated so far is limited, the data obtained provide clinical proof-of-concept for the opportunity to abrogate side effects by withdrawal of TM123. Enrollment into the Phase IA study is ongoing. Citation Format: Armin Ehninger, Julia Riewaldt, Cordula Gründer, Kristin Franke, Maria Schreiber, Martin Wermke, Sabrina Kraus, Carla Kreissig, Jan Koedam, Michael Pehl, Gerhard Ehninger, Marc Cartellieri. Expansion kinetics and cytokine profiles of UniCAR-T-CD123, a rapidly switchable two-component CAR-T therapy, in patients with relapsed/refractory AML [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1506.

Hereditary spherocytosis (HS) is characterised by increased osmotic fragility and enhanced membrane loss of red blood cells (RBC) due to defective membrane protein complexes. In our diagnostic laboratory, we observed that pyruvate kinase (PK) activity in HS was merely slightly elevated with respect to the amount of reticulocytosis. In order to evaluate whether impaired PK activity is a feature of HS, we retrospectively analysed laboratory data sets from 172 unrelated patients with HS, hereditary elliptocytosis (HE), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) or PK deficiency, sickle cell or haemoglobin C disease, or β-thalassaemia minor. Results from linear regression analysis provided proof that PK activity decreases with rising reticulocyte counts in HS (R2 = 0·15; slope = 9·09) and, less significantly, in HE (R2 = 0·021; slope = 8·92) when compared with other haemolytic disorders (R2 ≥ 0·65; slopes ≥ 78·6). Reticulocyte-adjusted erythrocyte PK activity levels were significantly lower in HS and even declined with increasing reticulocytes (R2 = 0·48; slope = -9·74). In this report, we describe a novel association between HS and decreased PK activity that is apparently caused by loss of membrane-bound PK due to impaired structural integrity of the RBC membrane and may aggravate severity of haemolysis in HS.

Vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE) are an important cause of nosocomial infections, which are rapidly transmitted in hospitals. To identify possible transmission routes, we applied combined genomics and contact-network modeling to retrospectively evaluate routine VRE screening data generated by the infection control program of a hemato-oncology unit. Over 1 year, a total of 111 VRE isolates from 111 patients were collected by anal swabs in a tertiary care hospital in Southern Germany. All isolated VRE were whole-genome sequenced, followed by different in-depth bioinformatics analyses including genotyping and determination of phylogenetic relations, aiming to evaluate a standardized workflow. Patient movement data were used to overlay sequencing data to infer transmission events and strain dynamics over time. A predominant clone harboring vanB and exhibiting genotype ST117/CT469 (n = 67) was identified. Our comprehensive combined analyses suggested intra-hospital spread, especially of clone ST117/CT469, despite of extensive screening, single room placement, and contact isolation. A new interactive tool to visualize these complex data was designed. Furthermore, a patient-contact network-modeling approach was developed, which indicates both the periodic import of the clone into the hospital and its spread within the hospital due to patient movements. The analyzed spread of VRE was most likely due to placement of patients in the same room prior to positivity of screening. We successfully demonstrated the added value for this combined strategy to extract well-founded knowledge from interdisciplinary data sources. The combination of patient-contact modeling and high-resolution typing unraveled the transmission dynamics within the hospital department and, additionally, a constant VRE influx over time.

A variety of eukaryotes, in particular plants, do not contain the required number of tRNAs to support the translation of mitochondria-encoded genes and thus need to import tRNAs from the cytosol. This study identified two Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) proteins, Tric1 and Tric2 (for tRNA import component), which on simultaneous inactivation by T-DNA insertion lines displayed a severely delayed and chlorotic growth phenotype and significantly reduced tRNA import capacity into isolated mitochondria. The predicted tRNA-binding domain of Tric1 and Tric2, a sterile-α-motif at the C-terminal end of the protein, was required to restore tRNA uptake ability in mitochondria of complemented plants. The purified predicted tRNA-binding domain binds the T-arm of the tRNA for alanine with conserved lysine residues required for binding. T-DNA inactivation of both Tric proteins further resulted in an increase in the in vitro rate of in organello protein synthesis, which was mediated by a reorganization of the nuclear transcriptome, in particular of genes encoding a variety of proteins required for mitochondrial gene expression at both the transcriptional and translational levels. The characterization of Tric1/2 provides mechanistic insight into the process of tRNA import into mitochondria and supports the theory that the tRNA import pathway resulted from the repurposing of a preexisting protein import apparatus.

Introduction Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a genetically heterogeneous disease characterized by clonal expansion of immature myeloid progenitor cells in the bone marrow (BM). Mutations of the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene occur in approximately 30% of AML cases, with Internal Tandem Duplications (ITD) being the most common type of mutation. Several FLT3 specific inhibitors (TKI) have been developed such as quizartinib, crenolanib and midostaurin (recently approved for clinical use). Nevertheless FLT3-ITD is associated with unfavorable prognosis and patients develop drug resistance with the underlying mechanisms remaining largely unexplained. Recently, changes within the actin cytoskeleton were associated with drug resistance development in various cancers. FLT3-ITD mutations are associated with RAC1 activation. RAC1 belongs to the family of RHO GTPases and enhances the actin polymerization by inducing the expression of N-WASP or WAVE2 and ARP2/3 complex. Therefore, we investigated actin cytoskeleton rearrangements through RAC1 activation as a potential mechanism contributing to Midostaurin resistance in AML. Material and methods First, we developed two Midostaurin resistant AML cell lines (MID-RES, MV4-11 and MOLM-13). Single cell measurements of Cell Stiffnes, cell adhesion forces between tumor and HS5 stroma cells and Actin filaments were performed by Atomic Force Microscopy (FluidFM®) and SIM microscopy, respectively. RAC1 activation was measured by RAC1 activation kit provided by Cytoskeleton. FLT3 surface and intracellular expression was measured by Flow cytometry and western blot, respectively. Cell death was analyzed by Annexin/PI staining in flow cytometry. Results The MID-RES cell lines MV4-11/MOLM-13 showed higher FLT3 surface and intracellular expression compared to their MID sensitive parental cells. In line with our expectations, we observed RAC1 activation, as well as an up-regulation of actin polymerization positive regulators such as N-WASP, WAVE2, PFN1 and ARP2/3 complex and the inhibition of actin polymerization negative regulator P-ser3 CFL1 in MID-RES cells. FLT3 receptor knock down by siRNAs reversed the MID resistance and reduced RAC1 activation and actin polymerization inducers expression. Likewise, bioinformatic analysis from publicly available microarray expression data (E-MTAB-3444), confirmed positive correlation between actin polymerization inducers and FLT3 signaling expression in 178 FLT3-ITD (r=0,67) and 461 FLT3 WT(r= 0,57) de novoAML patients. RAC1 induced Actin polymerization positively correlates with actin filaments growth and cell stiffness, which was observed in our MID-RES cells, higher load of actin filaments and increased cell stiffness. The combination between RAC1 specific inhibitor, EHT1864 and Midostaurin synergistically induces cell death in MID-RES cells by arresting cell cycle in G0/G1 phase and activating apoptosis. Beside, this combination reduced the adhesion forces to stroma cells, decreased the expression of PFN1/N-WASP/ARP2 and consequently reduced drastically the number of actin filaments and cell stiffness in MID-RES cells. EHT1864 and Midostaurin (alone and in combination) were not toxic in PBMCs obtained from healthy donors. Interestingly, this combination increase >45 % cell death in cells obtained from refractory FLT3-mutated AML patient (this patient was relapsed (≥ 50% residual blasts in the bone marrow)under Chemotherapy+Midostaurin combination).The specific knock down of PFN1/N-WASP/ARP2 with siRNAs equally reversed the resistance to Midostaurin. Of note, RAC1 regulates the anti-apoptotic BCL2. Indeed, EHT1864 in combination with Midostaurin reduced anti-apoptotic family BCL2/MCL1 expression and increases the pro-apoptotic proteins BAX/PUMA. As expected, our MID-RES cells showed higher sensitivity to BCL2 inhibitor Venetoclax, than their parental cells. The combinations EHT1864+venetoclax, venetoclax+midostaurin and venetoclax+Midostaurin+EHT1864 synergistically induced cell death in MID-RES cells. Conclusion Actin polymerization inducers N-WASP, ARP2/3 complex and PFN1 may provide a valuable approach to overcome Midostaurin resistance in AML. Our data further suggest that the addition of BCL2 inhibition through EHT1864 and venetoclax could represent an interesting strategy to potentiate the activity of Midostaurin in FLT3 mutated AML. Disclosures Duell: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy.