Search

Background: There is a need to reliably render urolithiasis patients completely stone free with minimal morbidity. We report on the initial safety and feasibility with steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) in a prospective study using basket extraction as a comparison. Materials and Methods: A pilot randomized controlled study was conducted comparing SURE with basket extraction postlaser lithotripsy. SURE is performed using the CVAC™ Aspiration System, a steerable catheter (with introducer). The safety and feasibility of steering CVAC throughout the collecting system under fluoroscopy and aspirating stone fragments as it was designed to do were evaluated. Fluoroscopy time, change in hemoglobin, adverse events through 30 days, total and proportion of stone volume removed at 1 day, intraoperative stone removal rate, and stone-free rate (SFR) at 30 days through CT were compared. Results: Seventeen patients were treated (n = 9 SURE, n = 8 Basket). Baseline demographics and stone parameters were not significantly different between groups. One adverse event occurred in each group (self-limiting ileus for SURE and urinary tract infection for Basket). No mucosal injury and no contrast extravasation were observed in either group. The CVAC catheter was steered throughout the collecting system and aspirated fragments. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time, procedure time, change in hemoglobin, or stone removal rate between groups. SURE removed more and a greater proportion of stone volume at day 1 vs baskets (202 mm3 vs 91 mm3, p

Introduction: We aim to share the experience of a single center in the management of eight cases of renal primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) which are uncommon, aggressive tumors. The objectives were to study the presentation of the disease, the treatment offered and its outcomes, and the comparison of the treatment with published literature. Methods: The single-center renal PNET data of all patients were retrospectively reviewed from 2011 to 2022. Renal PNET was seen in eight patients. Minimum follow-up period of 1 year was required. Results: Male-to-female ratio was 7:1. The mean age was 26.5 years. All were locally advanced tumors on presentation. One patient had an inferior vena cava thrombus, one patient had metastases on presentation, and two patients had tumor extending to paranephric space. The diagnosis was made by histopathology supported by immunohistochemistry showing CD99 positivity. All patients were treated with radical nephrectomy, followed by chemotherapy in all and radiotherapy in three patients. Two patients expired at 3% and 6 years after surgery, the remaining six are alive at a median follow-up period of 34.5 months. Conclusion: Renal PNET is an uncommon renal tumor which is aggressive and requires multimodal therapy for prolonged survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Byline: Niramya. Pathak, Pavan. Surwase, U. Karthik, Abhijit. Patil, Abhijit. Konnur, Shailesh. Soni, Abhishek. Singh, Arvind. Ganpule, Ravindra. Sabnis, Mahesh. Desai Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic is associated with secondary opportunistic fungal [...]

Objectives: Clinical T1 (cT1) renal mass treated surgically has a good prognosis, but there is an upstaging risk that potentially threatens oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). We aim to analyze and study the incidence, predictors, perioperative morbidity, and oncological outcomes of pT3a upstaging. Methodology: A retrospective study of 313 patients who underwent PN for cT1 renal mass at a single center from a single tertiary referral center between 2000 and 2021 was done. Demographic, perioperative, pathological, and outcome variables were reviewed. We compared these parameters between upstaged and non‐upstaged groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study preoperative variables associated with upstaging. Results: Nineteen patients were upstaged to pT3a. Making an incidence of 6.1%. Upstaged tumors were bigger (5.02 cm vs. 4.08 cm, p = 0.004), had higher clinical stage T1b (84.2 vs. 40.5%, p < 0.001), had more tumors which were central location (21 vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), had more endophytic and mesophytic tumors (15.8 vs. 5.8% and 52.6 vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001), and had higher R.E.N.A.L Nephrometry score (8.05 vs. 6, p < 0.001). Upstaged tumors had more operative times (227 vs. 203 min, p = 0.01), more postoperative complications (68.4 vs. 13.1%, p < 0.001), more major complications of Clavien Dindo Grade 3 and above (15.8 vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001). Age (OR 1.035, p = 0.034), Radiological tumor dimension (OR 1.578, p = 0.003), Radiological or Clinical stage (T1b) (9.19, p = 0.008), Higher Nephrometry score (Intermediate and High) (OR 6.184, p = 0.004) were preoperative predictors of upstaging. Oncological outcomes were comparable. Conclusion: Tumor upstaging was uncommon with more perioperative morbidity. Higher age, larger tumor size, higher tumor stage, and higher nephrometry scores were preoperative predictors of upstaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the dusting vs fragmentation modes with thulium fiber laser (TFL) in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for upper tract stones using the same fixed low-power settings in both the arms. The primary objective was to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) and secondary objectives were to compare mean operating times, hospital stay duration, complication rates, need for secondary procedures, and laser efficacy. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized trial, with patients having proximal ureteral or renal stones of 10–20 mm and planned for RIRS was done at a single institute. A total of 60 consecutively admitted patients with signed consent were included for randomization with 30 patients in each arm of dusting and fragmentation modes. Results: Median age in dusting and fragmentation arms of 41.5 and 45.5 years, median stone size of 10.45 and 12.25 mm, median stone volume of 351.6 and 490.7 mm3, and median stone density of 1263.5 HU in both arms with comparable hospital stay of median of 2 days in both arms. Lasing time was significantly lesser in the fragmentation group (20.5 minutes; interquartile range [IQR] 15.12–31.62) than in the dusting group (34.25 minutes, IQR 26.62–38.62, p < 0.001). Higher ablation speed for fragmentation mode (0.405 mm3/sec, IQR 0.337–0.635) than for dusting mode (0.17 mm3/sec, IQR 0.135–0.325, p < 0.001). SFRs and complication rates were comparable in both the arms. Conclusion: TFL in fragmentation mode has shorter lasing times and better laser efficacy than dusting mode with comparable minimal complications, SFRs, and hospital stay duration. Clinical Trial Registration number: CTRI050827. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Byline: Pavan. Surwase, Suhas. Lele, Ravindra. Sabnis, Arvind. Ganpule Pseudoaneurysm of corpora cavernosa is rare and its presentation as acute urinary retention has not been reported in the literature so [...]

Byline: Ravindra. Sabnis, Prashant. Mulawkar, Rohit. Joshi Introduction These guidelines have been drafted by the Urological Society of India benign prostatic hyperplasia/obstruction ((BPH//BPO) guidelines panel and address management of BPH/BPO. [...]