1. A comparison of homemade vascular access ultrasound phantom models for peripheral intravenous catheter insertion
- Author
-
Saami Zakaria, Lauren Ann Selame, Zachary Risler, Arthur Au, Rishi Kalwani, Kelly Goodsell, Daniel Mirsch, Liam P Hughes, Samuel Blake Kluger, Resa E. Lewiss, and Kelly Kehm
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Catheters ,Peripheral intravenous ,Vascular access ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Intensive care ,Catheterization, Peripheral ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Ultrasonography, Interventional ,Ultrasonography ,Catheter insertion ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Phantoms, Imaging ,business.industry ,Ultrasound ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Interventional radiology ,Peripheral ,Nephrology ,Surgery ,Radiology ,business ,Ultrasound phantom - Abstract
Background: Ultrasound (U/S) guided peripheral IV catheter (PIV) placement is often needed after unsuccessful traditional IV attempts. Commercial U/S PIV training phantoms are expensive and difficult to alter. Non-commercial phantoms have been described; however, there has been no comparison of these models. The primary objectives of this study were to compare the echogenic and haptic properties of various non-commercial phantoms. Secondary objectives were to characterize the cost and ease of making the phantoms. Methods: This prospective observational study trialed six unique phantom models: Amini Ballistics; Morrow Ballistics; University of California San Diego (UCSD) gelatin; Rippey Chicken; Nolting Spam; and Johnson Tofu. Total cost and creation time were noted. Emergency Ultrasound Fellowship trained physicians performed U/S guided PIV placement on each model to evaluate their resemblance to human tissue haptic and echogenicity properties, utility for training, and comparability to commercial phantoms (Likert scale 1–5; higher performance = 5). Results: The Rippey model scored highest for each primary objective with an aggregate score of 4.8/5. UCSD ranked second and Nolting last for all primary objectives, with aggregate scores 3.7/5 and 1.3/5 respectively. Cost of production ranged from $4.39 (Johnson) to $29.76 (UCSD). Creation times ranged from 10 min (Johnson) to 120 min (UCSD). Conclusion: In our study the Rippey model performed best and offered a mid-level cost and creation time. Non-commercial U/S phantoms may represent cost-effective and useful PIV practice tools. Future studies should investigate the utility of these phantoms in teaching U/S guided PIV to novices and compare non-commercial to commercial phantoms.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF