Search

The purpose of this case-control study was to evaluate the impact of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer on surgical stress response and nutritional status. All 34 consecutive patients undergoing hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer at our surgical unit between 2008 and 2013 were retrospectively compared with 34 patients undergoing esophagectomy with open gastric tubulization (open), matched for neoadjuvant therapy, pathological stage, gender and age. Demographic data, tumor features and postoperative course (including quality of life and systemic inflammatory and nutritional status) were compared. Postoperative course was similar in terms of complication rate. Length of stay in intensive care unit was shorter in patients undergoing hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy ( P = 0.002). In the first postoperative day, patients undergoing hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy had lower C-reactive protein levels ( P = 0.001) and white cell blood count ( P = 0.05), and higher albumin serum level ( P = 0.001). In this group, albumin remained higher also at third ( P = 0.06) and seventh ( P = 0.008) postoperative day, and C-reactive protein resulted lower at third post day ( P = 0.04). Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy significantly improved the systemic inflammatory and catabolic response to surgical trauma, contributing to a shorter length of stay in intensive care unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) is an effective neoadjuvant treatment to avoid amputation in patients with locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS). We aimed to investigate whether STS histological type plays a role in predicting clinical outcomes., Methods: This study reports a retrospective analysis of 125 patients with limb threatening STS (liposarcoma, n = 41; malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, n = 20; leiomyosarcoma, n = 20; miscellany, n = 44), who underwent HILP from 1990 through 2015 at our institution. The following endpoints were evaluated: tumor response (assessed by radiological imaging and histology), limb sparing rate, local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: On average, overall (complete + partial) tumor response was significantly greater in patients affected with liposarcoma as compared to those with other histotypes (radiological response rate: 38/41, 92.7% vs 66/84, 78.6%, P-value: 0.048; mean histological necrosis: 83.6% vs 52.9%, P < 0.0001). Limb sparing rate was also higher among patients with liposarcoma as compared to other histotypes (39/41, 95.1% vs 62/84, 73.8%, P-value: 0.005). As regards survival, LPFS was similar across tumor types, whereas OS resulted significantly worse in patients with limb leiomyosarcoma (log-rank P-value: 0.009)., Conclusions: HILP is a very effective treatment modality for limb threatening STS. In our series, liposarcoma appears to be the histological type most sensitive to HILP in terms of tumor response and thus limb sparing, which might help clinicians in the patient selection process., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of esophagectomy for cancer on patients' occupational status., Methods: All 109 consecutive patients presenting with esophageal cancer to the Surgical Oncology Unit of the Veneto Institute of Oncology Padua (Italy) between November 1, 2009 and March 15, 2012, were included in the study. Information on occupational status at diagnosis and at 1 year after esophagectomy was retrieved. Health-related quality of life was evaluated at discharge after surgery using selected aspects of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Non parametric statistics were used., Results: Sixty-one patients (49.6%) were active workers at diagnosis and 50 of them (82.0%) underwent esophagectomy. Eighteen active workers (18/50, 36.0%) quit their job within one year from esophagectomy. They received jejunostomy more often than patients still working after surgery (50.0% vs. 18.8%, respectively; p = 0.03) and reported lower social functioning at discharge (mean ± SD 63.6 ± 16.4 vs. 80.2 ± 25.6 in others, p = 0.02). Multivariable analysis identified jejunostomy as independent predictor of job-quitting at 1 year after esophagectomy (p = 0.03; OR 4.75, 95% C.I. 1.11-20.39) but not social functioning at discharge (p = 0.21)., Conclusions: Patients should be informed that they may experience social and work disability due to cancer treatment and adequate interventions of return-to-work support should be provided. Adequate welfare strategy should be implemented for esophageal cancer survivors, enhancing their role competences and contributing to precision care medicine., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)