Search

Copyright of Journal of Shanghai University of Sport is the property of Editorial Department of Journal of Shanghai University of Sport and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Shanghai University of Sport is the property of Editorial Department of Journal of Shanghai University of Sport and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Retos: Nuevas Perspectivas de Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación is the property of Federacion Espanola de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educacion Fisica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The current research aims to identify mechanisms to reduce the phenomenon of sports naturalization in the Arab Republic of Egypt, by identifying the challenges of resorting to the phenomenon of sports naturalization in the Arab Republic of Egypt, and then arriving at mechanisms to reduce the phenomenon of sports naturalization in the Arab Republic of Egypt. The researcher used the descriptive approach, and the community The research consists of working leaders working in the Ministry of Youth and Sports with a minimum rank of general director, which are (head of the sports sector, head of the youth sector, permanent agent, heads of central administrations and public administrations), boards of directors and executive leadership of the Egyptian Olympic Committee, and some Olympic sports federations, which number ( 15) Olympic Sports Federation. The research sample was selected by random stratified method and consists of (219) individuals. The researcher used data collection tools, including an analysis of documents and records, and a questionnaire about mechanisms to reduce the phenomenon of sports naturalization in the Arab Republic of Egypt. The most important results were that the economic dimension and temptations Materialism is one of the most important reasons that lead to resorting to naturalization. Sports naturalization is also one of the most dangerous threats to global sports, and the exacerbation of this phenomenon will lead to the confinement of sports competition between the laws of the article and the financing of deals to purchase athletes to naturalize them. In addition, there is no article in the new sports law to combat sports naturalization, and the majority of different sports federations have not established unified controls to limit the naturalization of athletes, which has caused its spread. The researcher recommended setting a vision to correct the course of sports institutions and developing their working mechanisms to do their part to limit sports naturalization, and launching a fund to spend on champions and talents in individual sports to confront the phenomenon of naturalization of sports players, and adding an article to the new sports law to combat naturalization, and closing loopholes in sports laws, in addition to Expanding the establishment of schools for the gifted to detect talents early and prevent them from becoming naturalized talents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The institutional rules of International Sports Federations ("IFs") and the International Olympic Committee ("IOC") concerning nationality and its transfer therein are regulated by the Nottebohm safeguard, which requires the conferral of nationality under domestic laws to be consistent with international law for the conferral to be valid in the international legal sphere. The international sporting arenas qualify as international legal space, but the compatibility of naturalization laws with this legal space is regulated and enforced not by states, but by non-state entities, namely IFs and the IOC. These institutional rules possess a normative character because the pertinent stakeholders consent to them by contract, which in turn provides for the jurisdiction of internal quasi-judicial determination and ultimately gives rise to arbitral awards (as a form of ultimate appeal) to the Court of Arbitration for Sport ("CAS"). The key provision is Rule 41 of the Olympic Charter and its interpretative Bye-Laws, which provide that an athlete may switch sporting nationality provided that three years have elapsed from their last participation for the country they previously represented. This general rule may be supplemented by the institutional rules of IFs, the majority of which operate nationality review panels for this purpose. This Article selectively examines the rules and institutions of two IFs other than the IOC, namely the Fédération Internationale de Basketball (International Basketball Federation) ("FIBA") and the World Athletics Federation ("WAF"). Each struggle with different objectives and nationality transfers, chiefly naturalizations, gives rise to a number of problems and concerns that are resolved through the observance and enforcement of varying internal nationality rules. This Article suggests that a set of five questions sets the standard for a human rights impact assessment of all naturalizations in the sport domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2522-3380) is the property of Arab Journal of Sciences & Research Publishing (AJSRP) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article is devoted to the problems of implementing the right to judicial protection of the labor rights of athletes and coaches. It was right under international and Russian law and one of the most important elements of a person’s legal status. At the same time, the realization of the right to judicial protection in sport has its own characteristics, because athletes and coaches actually cannot choose the legal authority, that will consider the case. In this research judicial practice is analyzed, in which considered the issue of the possible application of sanctions to an athlete for appealing to a state court. The study concludes that, despite the presence in sport of its own special system of dispute resolution bodies, the application of sanctions for the use of one of the fundamental constitutional and labor rights does not find a reasonable justification.

Copyright of Journal of Physical Education / Tiyu Xuekan is the property of Journal of Physical Education Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Physical Education / Tiyu Xuekan is the property of Journal of Physical Education Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Physical Education / Tiyu Xuekan is the property of Journal of Physical Education Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Ankara Haci Bayram Veli Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo is the property of Universidad Externado de Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Anbar University for Law & Political Sciences is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The intersection of sport and human rights has demonstrated that the actions of global sport mega-event franchise owners can now no longer be viewed as impervious to wider human rights considerations. In examining recent operational developments undertaken by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), as evidenced by their institutional embrace of international human rights standards, this article cautions against an uncritical acclaim of such developments. By drawing upon legal texts, the extant literature on the overlap of both sport and human rights law, and Foucault's governmentality theory, it argues that whilst the IOC's embrace of human rights remains a positive development, their ongoing application of the 'clean venue' principle on Olympic Host Cities remains problematic for two key reasons. It argues, first, that the 'clean venue' principle can be understood as a governmental technique that disciplines and controls Olympic spaces, and those who fall within the regulatory, legal, and operational reach of the principle itself, whilst preserving the existing political economy in which the Olympics are embedded within. Secondly, it argues that as an inescapable expression of the IOC's commercial and contractual control, the 'clean venue' principle raises additional human rights concerns which impact upon various rights such as freedom of assembly and expression and the rights of local communities within and around Olympic and 'non-Olympic' spaces. Ultimately, this article contends that while the IOC's recent operational developments are to be welcomed, much work remains to ensure that human rights law is more visibly foregrounded within the IOC's legal framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Maintaining an effective testing program is critical to the success and credibility of the anti-doping movement. However, a low detection ratio compared to the assumed real prevalence of sport doping has led some to question and criticize the effectiveness of the current testing system. In this perspective article, we review the results of the global testing program, discuss the purpose of testing, and compare benefits and limitations of performance indicators commonly used to evaluate testing efforts. We suggest that an effective testing program should distinguish between preventive testing and testing aimed at detecting the use of prohibited substances and prohibited methods. In case of preventive testing, the volume of the test program in terms of number of samples, tests and analyses is likely to be positively related to the extent of the deterrent effect achieved. However, there is a lack of literature on how the deterrent effect works in the practical context of doping testing. If the primary goal is to detect doping, the testing must be risk- and intelligence-based, and quality in test planning is more important than quantity in sample collection. The detection ratio can be a useful tool for evaluating the effectiveness of doping testing, but for the calculation one should take into account the number of athletes tested and not just the number of collected samples, as the former would provide a more precise measure of the tests' ability to detect doping among athletes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In order to study the characteristics and psychological characteristics of athletes' illegal and criminal behaviours, this paper puts forward a study on the disciplinary violations of High-performance sport athletes in China. This study used the methods of literature review and expert interviews to analyze the disciplinary violations of High-performance sport athletes in China. The results show that the disciplinary violations of High-performance sport athletes in China mainly include match fixing, false age, false gender, doping, violence, etc. The reasons for these disciplinary violations involve low education level, distorted ideological concepts, weak legal awareness, inadequate sports laws and regulations, and the impact of social misconduct. In response to the existing problems, some feasible suggestions have been put forward, including strengthening the construction of athletes' moral quality, strengthening the cultivation of legal awareness, strengthening the construction of sports legal system, and increasing the punishment for disciplinary violations. These suggestions are intended to lay a foundation for the rapid, stable, civilized and healthy development of High-performance sport in China. In summary, in order to solve the problem of illegal and criminal behaviour among athletes, it is necessary to play the guiding role of the Sports Law and improve the legal responsibility for doping violations; Expand the application of civil compensation, broaden the channels for athletes' relief, and encourage athletes to request compensation for infringement liability; Improve relevant administrative regulations and provide guarantees for inspections outside doping competitions; Strictly crack down on doping crimes and use criminal punishment to crack down on the doping crime circle. These measures will help solve the problem of athletes' crimes and promote the healthy development of High-performance sport. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Acta Iuris Stetinensis is the property of Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecinskiego / University of Szczecin Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article, original in nature, was devoted to the issue of awards and prizes for e-sports players. The motivational financial instruments in question are regulated in the Sports Law, specifically in Article 31. The author has attempted to solve the legal problem of finding an answer to the question of the legal possibility for municipalities to establish and finance prizes and awards for e-sports players under Article 31 of the Sports Law. Due to the singular and causal works in the field of e-sports funding, which do not address the issue of establishing and funding prizes and awards for e-sports players under Article 31 of the Sports Act, the elaboration of this issue within the framework of the article will, in the author's opinion, undoubtedly enrich the current literature on the subject. The introductory considerations focus on presenting the essence of the definition of sport and attempt to qualify e-sports as a sport under the Sports Act, which is significant for the possibility of local authorities establishing prizes and awards. The key views of the literature, judicial decisions, and the state of the law in this area were presented. Investigations in this area have led to the conclusion that, with a few reservations, it is possible to qualify e-sport as a sport. Subsequently, the focus was on the legal aspects concerning the possibility for municipalities to establish and finance prizes and awards for e-sports players. The problem concerning the understanding of competition under the Sports Act was resolved, and it was pointed out that e-sports players, despite the lack of a Polish e-sports association, can participate in sports competitions under the Sports Act. In addition, the problematic premise concerning the importance of a given sport for a local authority has been clarified. The final considerations in this area have allowed de lege ferenda postulates to be formulated. The analysis is based on legal norms and statements of doctrine and jurisprudence. The article contains considerations concerning the normative and dogmatic sphere as well as the sphere of law application by administrative courts. The research has a national character. In this article, the dogmatic-legal method has been applied, consisting of the analysis of legal regulations on the establishment and financing of awards and prizes for players of electronic sports. The subject matter discussed is divided into several main editorial units. The different parts correspond to the main outline of the problem and its relation to important scientific and practical issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Court of Justice's case law, stretching back fifty years, provides that sporting practices which fall within the scope of EU law may be applied on the condition that it is shown they are necessary to achieve legitimate objectives and that they comply with the demands of the test of proportionality. This admirable model of 'conditional autonomy' is in danger. On 21 December 2023, the Court changed its approach. It restricted the scope for arguments specific to sport to be advanced in defence of practices reviewed against the demands of EU competition law. The risk is that an interpretation of EU law 'from a competition standpoint' – as the Court put it on 21 December - in pending cases concerning the transfer system, the regulation of agents and club (re)location will prevent sport's (claimed) special features even being assessed as part of the legal analysis. This paper urges the Court not to wreck its excellent track record in the development of EU sports law. It should treat most choices about governance in sport as restrictions of competition by effect, not object. The intent is not to immunise them from review but rather to ensure that review stretches beyond Article 101(3) TFEU and is fully sensitive to the economic and sporting context in which governing bodies operate as regulators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Physical Education / Tiyu Xuekan is the property of Journal of Physical Education Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Physical Education / Tiyu Xuekan is the property of Journal of Physical Education Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The purpose of this study is to examine experiences female collegiate athletes encountered with Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) legislation. Ten collegiate female athletes across multiple divisions and geographic regions were interviewed for this study. Participants discussed various facets of their experiences with NIL, such as team dynamics and personal branding. The results of this study suggest differences in (1) their institutional educational processes for NIL, (2) their attitudes toward NIL, (3) shifts (or lack thereof) in their team's group cohesion and leadership, and (4) their experience with forming and managing their personal brand. This study adds to the current body of literature illuminating the ways in which NIL legislation has impacted team dynamics and athlete branding, an area of research previously unexplored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on recent developments in sports law through a survey of court decisions between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Topics include alternative dispute resolution in sports-related cases, the application of antitrust laws to professional and collegiate sports, and significant rulings affecting NCAA regulations and athlete compensation.

In the past, sports activity mainly served as a means of rehabilitation for persons with disabilities (PWDs), leading to sports’ organizational structures to be limited primarily to athletes with disabilities (AWDs). Today, given the professionalization of adaptive sports, sports activity may also be a source of income. This, however, brings implications for forming adequate organizational structures that ensure achievement of best sports results and integration. Integration of PWDs is a process aimed at including them in the community life of persons with disabilities and opening the circles of able-bodied persons to PWDs. Given the above, in 2010 the Sports Act started to move away from the discriminating division between sports for “the able-bodied” and for “persons with disabilities”. At the moment, AWDs are subject to the same regulations as other athletes and efforts are made to involve them in competitive sports on the same terms and within the same organizational structures. The aim of this study is to see if the adopted model of organizational structures in professional (Olympic and Paralympic) has significance for the sense of integration from the perspective of AWDs. To answer this question, provisions of the Sports Act that regulate the creation of Polish sports associations (PSAs) are analysed. Results of the analysis are juxtaposed with empirical research used for expert opinions for the Ministry of Sports and Tourism, which covered 613 Paralympic athletes. Sociological, including statistical, methods are used for the analysis of empirical research. The study employs the method of investigation of the law in force to analyse provisions of the Sports Act, relying on rulings of administrative courts and legislative materials. In the light of opinions of AWDs affiliated in PSAs dedicated to training both able-bodied athletes and AWDs, different opinions are observed on the sense of integration in sports when compared with opinions of AWDs affiliated in associations dedicated solely to training AWDs. Even though the Sports Act does not have a direct and literal proof for PSA’s integrational character, interpretation of provisions by administrative authorities and their application by courts suggests otherwise. Therefore, it can be concluded that legislative changes regarding the model of PSAs, which organizes competition for both able-bodied and AWDs brings positive results in terms of integration.

Copyright of Jurnalul Baroului Cluj is the property of Cluj Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi is the property of Justice Academy of Turkey and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Română de Drept al Afacerilor is the property of Wolters Kluwer Romania and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Retos: Nuevas Perspectivas de Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación is the property of Federacion Espanola de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educacion Fisica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

“Never look a gift horse in the mouth” is a well-known saying, yet the proverb might recently have gained new meaning. Just before the recent World Cup finals in dressage and show jumping in Riyad, there were reports about horses with blue tongues in the dressage sport. These non-human athletes did not get enough air, presumably due to overly tight bridles and excessive pressure applied by their riders. Currently, animal protection is not sufficiently harmonized and enforced in the EU, but there are reasons to be hopeful. The EU should take the lead and require member States to implement comprehensive animal protection systems.

The article is devoted to the problems of consideration of individual labor disputes of athletes and coaches in the jurisdictional bodies of sports federations and professional sports leagues. The current legislation provides for the possibility of creating bodies of pre-trial settlement of disputes in the field of physical culture and sports within the structure of all-Russian sports federations and professional leagues, which can consider individual labor disputes of athletes and coaches. At the same time, certain problems arise already at the stage of determining the jurisdiction of these bodies in terms of the possibility of considering individual labor disputes by them. Within the framework of this study, the problems related to the issues of the correlation of labor legislation and legislation on physical culture and sports, related to the procedure and conditions for the formation of jurisdictional bodies, the peculiarities of submitting a dispute for their consideration, and the observance of the principle of equality of the parties are identified. Proposals have been developed to improve the current legislation.

Copyright of Journal of Capital Institute of Physical Education is the property of Shoudu Tiyu Xueyuan and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The construction of Chinese sports arbitration system not only follows the development trend of international sports arbitration, but also reflects the characteristics of China, with notable domestic highlights such as parallelism between ex-official and independent operation, dynamic balance between efficiency and justice orientation, organic unity between sports autonomy and judicial intervention, dynamical interaction between voluntary and compulsory arbitration, and integrated promotion of domestic and foreign-related rule of law. However, there are also some shortcomings in Chinese sports arbitration, such as the independence of arbitration needs to be further improved, the scope of arbitration needs to be further clarified, the interface with other dispute resolution methods needs to be further strengthened, and the coordination with international sports arbitration needs to be further clarified. In order to promote the better implementation of sports arbitration in China, it is necessary to achieve the organizational independence and rule-making autonomy of Chinese sports arbitration institutions as soon as possible, assure the jurisdictional application of composite sports disputes, clarify the meaning of the clause "other disputes arising in the course of competitive sports activities", improve the relationship between sports arbitration and internal dispute resolution mechanisms of sports organizations and domestic courts, and also clarify the jurisdiction of international sports arbitration and whether specific disputes can be appealed to the court of international arbitration for sport. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Europarecht (05312485) is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Shanghai Physical Education Institute / Shanghai Tiyu Xueyuan Xuebao is the property of Shanghai Physical Education Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Belügyi Szemle / Academic Journal of Internal Affairs is the property of Ministry of Interior of Hungary and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This Note intersects labor, employment, and sports law by reexamining the 2015 National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Northwestern decision on the employee status of student-athletes in light of recent developments in sport and labor law jurisprudence. This Note critiques the rationale of the Northwestern decision under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and highlights pertinent Name Image and Likeness and NLRB jurisprudence that signify a shift in how the NLRB views this issue. It ultimately argues that student-athletes should be considered employees under Section 2(3) of the NLRA for purposes of collective bargaining with their respective universities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Physical Education / Tiyu Xuekan is the property of Journal of Physical Education Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Physical Education / Tiyu Xuekan is the property of Journal of Physical Education Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Vilnius University Open Series is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The second edition of the Handbook on International Sports Law, edited by James A.R. Nafziger and Ryan Gauthier, offers a comprehensive examination of the application of law to critical controversies in the sports industry, with a focus on Europe and North America. The book covers a wide range of topics, including gender-related discrimination, the impact of the pandemic on the 2020 Olympic Games, anti-competition laws in sports, and restrictions on college athlete compensation in the United States. The content is organized into three sections, covering dispute resolution, athlete eligibility and rights, and the role of commercial and labor law in the sports industry. While the book primarily focuses on Europe and North America, it provides valuable information for sport managers and is a leading authority on international sports law. [Extracted from the article]