Search

Purpose: Selinexor is a novel XPO1 inhibitor which inhibits the export of tumor suppressor proteins and oncoprotein mRNAs, leading to cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells. While selinexor is currently FDA approved to treat multiple myeloma, compelling preclinical and early clinical studies reveal selinexor's efficacy in treating hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies, including sarcoma, gastric, bladder, prostate, breast, ovarian, skin, lung, and brain cancers. Current reviews of selinexor primarily highlight its use in hematologic malignancies; however, this review seeks to summarize the recent evidence of selinexor treatment in solid tumors. Methods: Pertinent literature searches in PubMed and the Karyopharm Therapeutics website for selinexor and non-hematologic malignancies preclinical and clinical trials. Results: This review provides evidence that selinexor is a promising agent used alone or in combination with other anticancer medications in non-hematologic malignancies. Conclusion: Further clinical investigation of selinexor treatment for solid malignancies is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Patients with RR DLBCL who have received ≥ 2 lines of therapy have limited treatment options and an expected overall survival (OS) of

Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral selective-inhibitor-of-nuclear-export, granted accelerated approval by FDA (2019) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We sought to quantitatively summarize the selinexor efficacy and safety in RRMM. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinicaltrial.gov, and google scholar, until May 2023, studies about selinexor use in RRMM. The outcome measures of interest were primarily efficacy outcomes, in addition to safety outcomes. Random-effect model analyses were performed, at statistical significance of P<0.05, using the RevMan software. Meta-analyses of eleven included clinical trials yielded a significant 56.21% overall clinical benefit, 46.91% overall response, 4.89% complete response, 23.41% very good partial response, 24.68% partial response, and 28.06% stable disease rates with selinexor. Due to safety reasons, selinexor caused significant increase in discontinuation rate, 16.80%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher efficacy with selinexor plus dexamethasone and proteasome inhibitor combinations than with selinexor alone. The multiple myeloma type, high cytogenetic risk, refractory state, and advanced disease state did not affect performance. Risk of selection, performance, and detection biases were unclear in the included trials. Selinexor led to significant positive responses with an acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients, despite higher rates of safety-related discontinuations. Selinexor-based combinations further enhanced response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with RR DLBCL who have received ≥ 2 lines of therapy have limited treatment options and an expected overall survival (OS) of < 6 months. The SADAL study evaluated single-agent oral selinexor in patients with RR DLBCL and demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.1% with median duration of response (DOR) of 9.3 months. The analyses described here evaluated a number of subpopulations in order to understand how response correlates with survival outcomes in order to identify patients who could most optimally benefit from selinexor treatment. Median age was 67 years; 44.8% of patients were ≥ 70 years of age. The median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI 6.2, 13.7) at a median follow-up of 14.8 months. The median OS was not reached in patients with a CR or PR, while patients who did not respond have a median OS of 4.9 months (p < 0.0001). Patients < 70 years had an OS of 11.1 months compared with 7.8 months in patients ≥ 70 years. Among patients with or without prior ASCT, the median OS was 10.9 and 7.8 months, respectively. Among patients with disease refractory to the most recent DLBCL treatment regimen, the median OS was 7.0 months compared with 11.1 months for disease not refractory to the most recent treatment. In a patient population in which survival is expected to be < 6 months, treatment with single-agent oral selinexor was associated with a median survival of 9 months. Increased median OS observed in patients responding to selinexor was consistent across subgroups regardless of age, prior ASCT therapy, or refractory status. Randomized studies of selinexor in combination with a variety of other anti-DLBCL agents are planned. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02227251) on August 28, 2014. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02227251. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Exportin-1 is a nuclear transport protein that is overexpressed in cancer cells and associated with inferior outcomes across a range of malignancies. Selinexor is a novel FDA-approved inhibitor of Exportin-1 (XPO1). Although significant research has focused on integration of selinexor into the treatment regimens of adult cancers, it is increasingly recognized that XPO1-directed therapy may be effective as part of management of childhood cancers. We therefore summarize the history of, and latest knowledge about, the function and therapeutic inhibition of XPO1 as it relates to childhood cancer pathogenesis and treatment. Overexpression of Exportin-1 (XPO1), a key regulator of nuclear-to-cytoplasmic transport, is associated with inferior patient outcomes across a range of adult malignancies. Targeting XPO1 with selinexor has demonstrated promising results in clinical trials, leading to FDA approval of its use for multiple relapsed/refractory cancers. However, XPO1 biology and selinexor sensitivity in childhood cancer is only recently being explored. In this review, we will focus on the differential biology of childhood and adult cancers as it relates to XPO1 and key cargo proteins. We will further explore the current state of pre-clinical and clinical development of XPO1 inhibitors in childhood cancers. Finally, we will outline potentially promising future therapeutic strategies for, as well as potential challenges to, integrating XPO1 inhibition to improve outcomes for children with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]