Search

BackgroundStressful situations during intraoperative emergencies have negative impact on human cognitive functions. Consequently, task performance may decrease and patient safety may be compromised. Cognitive aids can counteract these effects and support anesthesiologists in their crisis management. The Professional Association of German Anesthesiologists set up a project to develop a comprehensive set of digital cognitive aids for intraoperative emergencies. A parallel development for several software platforms and stationary and mobile devices will accommodate the inhomogeneity of the information technology infrastructure within German anesthesia departments. ObjectiveThis paper aimed to provide a detailed overview of how the task of developing a digital cognitive aid for intraoperative crisis management in anesthesia was addressed that meets user requirements and is highly user-friendly. MethodsA user-centered design (UCD) process was conducted to identify, specify, and supplement the requirements for a digital cognitive aid. The study covered 4 aspects: analysis of the context of use, specification of user requirements, development of design solutions, and evaluation of design solutions. Three prototypes were developed and evaluated by end users of the application. Following each evaluation, the new requirements were prioritized and used for redesign. For the first and third prototype, the System Usability Scale (SUS) score was determined. The second prototype was evaluated with an extensive Web-based questionnaire. The evaluation of the third prototype included a think-aloud protocol. ResultsThe chosen methods enabled a comprehensive collection of requirements and helped to improve the design of the application. The first prototype achieved an average SUS score of 74 (SD 12), indicating good usability. The second prototype included the following main revisions: 2-column layout, initial selection of patient type (infant, adult, or parturient), 4 offered search options, and the option to check off completed action steps. Its evaluation identified the following major revision points: add quick selection for resuscitation checklists, design the top bar and tabs slightly larger, and add more pictograms to the text. The third prototype achieved an average SUS score of 77 (SD 15). The evaluation of the think-aloud protocol revealed a good intuitiveness of the application and identified a missing home button as the main issue. ConclusionsAnesthesiology—as an acute medical field—is particularly characterized by its high demands on decision making and action in dynamic, or time-critical situations. The integration of usability aspects is essential for everyday and emergency suitability. The UCD process allowed us to develop a prototypical digital cognitive aid, exhibiting high usability and user satisfaction in the demanding environment of anesthesiological emergencies. Both aspects are essential to increase the acceptance of the application in later stages. The study approach, combining different methods for determining user requirements, may be useful for other implementation projects in a highly demanding environment.

Preparations for anesthesiological management of patients build on preoperative patient self-reports concerning risk factors and comorbidities. In this setting, electronic documentation could facilitate innovative computerized functions, although patient-facing digital questionnaires require appropriate tools that patients can access effectively. To explore the feasibility of an electronic application for preoperative data acquisition directly from patients, a digital, tablet-based prototypical application has been developed within a user-centered design process in order to replace a previously used paper-based anamnesis sheet for perioperative risk evaluation. The implemented prototype has been extensively tested and iteratively improved to progressively provide an easy-to-use data entry function. To assess the suitability of this tool for everyday data acquisition by patients and physicians and to identify usability problems, the stepwise development process was accompanied by a heuristic evaluation as well as a thinkaloud evaluation, while another 56 participating patients completed a feedback sheet according to ISO 9241/10. The latter method detected additional usability problems that occurred during the use of the application, which contributed to iterative improvements of the prototype. Throughout the development process, 81 issues were identified and largely resolved. After these revisions of the prototype, the number of problems found per tester decreased from 4.75 to 0.96, while the overall rating increased to 6.14 out of 7 points (SD = 1.2). These improvements demonstrate the value and efficiency of such a user-centered design process and illustrate that a user-friendly patient-facing digital data entry can replace preoperative paper questionnaires for anesthesiological management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preparations for anesthesiological management of patients build on preoperative patient self-reports concerning risk factors and comorbidities. In this setting, electronic documentation could facilitate innovative computerized functions, although patient-facing digital questionnaires require appropriate tools that patients can access effectively. To explore the feasibility of an electronic application for preoperative data acquisition directly from patients, a digital, tablet-based prototypical application has been developed within a user-centered design process in order to replace a previously used paper-based anamnesis sheet for perioperative risk evaluation. The implemented prototype has been extensively tested and iteratively improved to progressively provide an easy-to-use data entry function. To assess the suitability of this tool for everyday data acquisition by patients and physicians and to identify usability problems, the stepwise development process was accompanied by a heuristic evaluation as well as a think-aloud evaluation, while another 56 participating patients completed a feedback sheet according to ISO 9241/10. The latter method detected additional usability problems that occurred during the use of the application, which contributed to iterative improvements of the prototype. Throughout the development process, 81 issues were identified and largely resolved. After these revisions of the prototype, the number of problems found per tester decreased from 4.75 to 0.96, while the overall rating increased to 6.14 out of 7 points (SD = 1.2). These improvements demonstrate the value and efficiency of such a user-centered design process and illustrate that a user-friendly patient-facing digital data entry can replace preoperative paper questionnaires for anesthesiological management.