1. Machine learning evaluation of intensified conditioning on haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients
- Author
-
Tomoyasu Jo, Kosuke Inoue, Tomoaki Ueda, Makoto Iwasaki, Yu Akahoshi, Satoshi Nishiwaki, Hiroki Hatsusawa, Tetsuya Nishida, Naoyuki Uchida, Ayumu Ito, Masatsugu Tanaka, Satoru Takada, Toshiro Kawakita, Shuichi Ota, Yuta Katayama, Satoshi Takahashi, Makoto Onizuka, Yuta Hasegawa, Keisuke Kataoka, Yoshinobu Kanda, Takahiro Fukuda, Ken Tabuchi, Yoshiko Atsuta, and Yasuyuki Arai
- Subjects
Medicine - Abstract
Abstract Background The advantage of intensified myeloablative conditioning (MAC) over standard MAC has not been determined in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Methods To evaluate heterogeneous effects of intensified MAC among individuals, we analyzed the registry database of adult ALL patients between 2000 and 2021. After propensity score matching, we applied a machine-learning Bayesian causal forest algorithm to develop a prediction model of individualized treatment effect (ITE) of intensified MAC on reduction in overall mortality at 1 year after HSCT. Results Among 2440 propensity score-matched patients, our model shows heterogeneity in the association between intensified MAC and 1-year overall mortality. Individuals in the high-benefit group (n = 1220), defined as those with ITEs greater than the median, are more likely to be younger, male, and to have higher refined Disease Risk Index (rDRI), T-cell phenotype, and grafts from related donors than those in the low-benefit group (n = 1220). The high-benefit approach (applying intensified MAC to individuals in the high-benefit group) shows the largest reduction in overall mortality at 1 year (risk difference [95% confidence interval], +5.94 percentage points [0.88 to 10.51], p = 0.011). In contrast, the high-risk approach (targeting patients with high or very high rDRI) does not achieve statistical significance (risk difference [95% confidence interval], +3.85 percentage points [−1.11 to 7.90], p = 0.063). Conclusions These findings suggest that the high-benefit approach, targeting patients expected to benefit from intensified MAC, has the capacity to maximize HSCT effectiveness using intensified MAC.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF