DÍAZ BAQUERO, MARÍA JIMENA, HENAO CASTILLO, MARÍA CAMILA, DE LA PAZ JÁCOME SAMPER, MARÍA, SANZ, ANDRÉS JARAMILLO, MURILLO RENGIFO, DIANA JOSÉ, HURTADO, CAMILA OSORIO, RAMÍREZ CARRILLO, CLAUDIA BIBIANA, and VILLOTA GUSTIN, GUILLERMO ANDRÉS
This paper pretends to analyze the burden of proof of liability derived from the air transport agreement, both International (Montreal Convention 1999) and nationally (Commercial Code), on the understanding that there are certain situations where this could be reversed. This is because disproportionate and unbalanced facts presented in the daily practice of aeronautics. The writing has the method, a deductive research strategy, which is why we started from a general premise to reach a specific topic, "disproportionate or unbalanced situations in the development of air transport activity, which reverses the burden of the test."In conclusion, the paper proposes a reversal of the burden of proof in certain cases where the inconsistency is evident, according to the principle of judicial economy, so important in the legal traffic busy today. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]