Search

In this article, we investigate the cardinality of Grobner basis under various orderings. We identify a family of polynomials F and a criteria for the monomial orderings such that the reduced Grobner basis is double exponential in cardinality. We also show that the said criteria is satisfied by orderings such as lexicographic, degree lexicographic and weighted orderings., Comment: 18 pages,2 figures

This paper introduces deterministic weighted real-time one-counter automaton (DWROCA). A DWROCA is a deterministic real-time one-counter automaton whose transitions are assigned a weight from a field. Two DWROCAs are equivalent if every word accepted by one is accepted by the other with the same weight. DWROCA is a sub-class of weighted one-counter automata with counter-determinacy. It is known that the equivalence problem for this model is in P. This paper gives a simpler proof and a better polynomial-time algorithm for checking the equivalence of two DWROCAs., Comment: 14 pages, 4 figures

We study the languages recognized by well-structured transition systems (WSTS) with upward and downward compatibility. Our first result shows that every pair of disjoint WSTS languages is regularly separable: there is a regular language containing one of them while being disjoint from the other. As a consequence, if a language as well as its complement are both recognized by WSTS, then they are necessarily regular. Our second result shows that the languages recognized by deterministic WSTS form a strict subclass of the languages recognized by all WSTS: we give a non-deterministic WSTS language that we prove cannot be recognized by a deterministic WSTS. The proof relies on a novel characterization of the languages accepted by deterministic WSTS., Comment: This paper is the journal version of the CONCUR23 paper "Separability and Non-Determinizability of WSTS'', which can be found in the previous version of this arxiv document. It covers both papers about regular separability in WSTS: the CONCUR23 paper and its predecessor the CONCUR18 paper. As this version does not contain an appendix, please refer to the previous version for missing proofs

We introduce weighted one-deterministic-counter automata (ODCA). These are weighted one-counter automata (OCA) with the property of counter-determinacy, meaning that all paths labelled by a given word starting from the initial configuration have the same counter-effect. Weighted ODCAs are a strict extension of weighted visibly OCAs, which are weighted OCAs where the input alphabet determines the actions on the counter. We present a novel problem called the co-VS (complement to a vector space) reachability problem for weighted ODCAs over fields, which seeks to determine if there exists a run from a given configuration of a weighted ODCA to another configuration whose weight vector lies outside a given vector space. We establish two significant properties of witnesses for co-VS reachability: they satisfy a pseudo-pumping lemma, and the lexicographically minimal witness has a special form. It follows that the co-VS reachability problem is in P. These reachability problems help us to show that the equivalence problem of weighted ODCAs over fields is in P by adapting the equivalence proof of deterministic real-time OCAs by B\"ohm et al. This is a step towards resolving the open question of the equivalence problem of weighted OCAs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the regularity problem, the problem of checking whether an input weighted ODCA over a field is equivalent to some weighted automaton, is in P. Finally, we show that the covering and coverable equivalence problems for uninitialised weighted ODCAs are decidable in polynomial time. We also consider boolean ODCAs and show that the equivalence problem for (non-deterministic) boolean ODCAs is in PSPACE, whereas it is undecidable for (non-deterministic) boolean OCAs., Comment: 36 pages, 11 figures

We present a framework that provides deterministic consistency algorithms for given memory models. Such an algorithm checks whether the executions of a shared-memory concurrent program are consistent under the axioms defined by a model. For memory models like SC and TSO, checking consistency is NP-complete. Our framework shows, that despite the hardness, fast deterministic consistency algorithms can be obtained by employing tools from fine-grained complexity. The framework is based on a universal consistency problem which can be instantiated by different memory models. We construct an algorithm for the problem running in time O*(2^k), where k is the number of write accesses in the execution that is checked for consistency. Each instance of the framework then admits an O*(2^k)-time consistency algorithm. By applying the framework, we obtain corresponding consistency algorithms for SC, TSO, PSO, and RMO. Moreover, we show that the obtained algorithms for SC, TSO, and PSO are optimal in the fine-grained sense: there is no consistency algorithm for these running in time 2^o(k) unless the exponential time hypothesis fails.

We investigate the fine-grained complexity of liveness verification for leader contributor systems. These consist of a designated leader thread and an arbitrary number of identical contributor threads communicating via a shared memory. The liveness verification problem asks whether there is an infinite computation of the system in which the leader reaches a final state infinitely often. Like its reachability counterpart, the problem is known to be NP-complete. Our results show that, even from a fine-grained point of view, the complexities differ only by a polynomial factor. Liveness verification decomposes into reachability and cycle detection. We present a fixed point iteration solving the latter in polynomial time. For reachability, we reconsider the two standard parameterizations. When parameterized by the number of states of the leader L and the size of the data domain D, we show an (L + D)^O(L + D)-time algorithm. It improves on a previous algorithm, thereby settling an open problem. When parameterized by the number of states of the contributor C, we reuse an O*(2^C)-time algorithm. We show how to connect both algorithms with the cycle detection to obtain algorithms for liveness verification. The running times of the composed algorithms match those of reachability, proving that the fine-grained lower bounds for liveness verification are met.

We study liveness and model checking problems for broadcast networks, a system model of identical clients communicating via message passing. The first problem that we consider is Liveness Verification. It asks whether there is a computation such that one of the clients visits a final state infinitely often. The complexity of the problem has been open since 2010 when it was shown to be P-hard and solvable in EXPSPACE. We close the gap by a polynomial-time algorithm. The algorithm relies on a characterization of live computations in terms of paths in a suitable graph, combined with a fixed-point iteration to efficiently check the existence of such paths. The second problem is Fair Liveness Verification. It asks for a computation where all participating clients visit a final state infinitely often. We adjust the algorithm to also solve fair liveness in polynomial time. Both problems can be instrumented to answer model checking questions for broadcast networks against linear time temporal logic specifications. The first problem in this context is Fair Model Checking. It demands that for all computations of a broadcast network, all participating clients satisfy the specification. We solve the problem via the Vardi-Wolper construction and a reduction to Liveness Verification. The second problem is Sparse Model Checking. It asks whether each computation has a participating client that satisfies the specification. We reduce the problem to Fair Liveness Verification.

We study the witness-counting problem: given a set of vectors $V$ in the $d$-dimensional vector space over $\mathbb{F}_2$, a target vector $t$, and an integer $k$, count all ways to sum-up exactly $k$ different vectors from $V$ to reach $t$. The problem is well-known in coding theory and received considerable attention in complexity theory. Recently, it appeared in the context of hardware monitoring. Our contribution is an algorithm for witness counting that is optimal in the sense of fine-grained complexity. It runs in time $\mathcal{O}^*(2^d)$ with only a logarithmic dependence on $m=|V|$. The algorithm makes use of the Walsh-Hadamard transform to compute convolutions over $\mathbb{F}_2^d$. The transform, however, overcounts the solutions. Inspired by the inclusion-exclusion principle, we introduce correction terms. The correction leads to a recurrence that we show how to solve efficiently. The correction terms are obtained from equivalence relations over $\mathbb{F}_2^d$. We complement our upper bound with two lower bounds on the problem. The first relies on $\# ETH$ and prohibits an $2^{o(d)}$-time algorithm. The second bound states the non-existence of a polynomial kernel for the decision version of the problem.

We study the fine-grained complexity of Leader Contributor Reachability (LCR) and Bounded-Stage Reachability (BSR), two variants of the safety verification problem for shared memory concurrent programs. For both problems, the memory is a single variable over a finite data domain. Our contributions are new verification algorithms and lower bounds. The latter are based on the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), the problem Set Cover, and cross-compositions. LCR is the question whether a designated leader thread can reach an unsafe state when interacting with a certain number of equal contributor threads. We suggest two parameterizations: (1) By the size of the data domain D and the size of the leader L, and (2) by the size of the contributors C. We present algorithms for both cases. The key techniques are compact witnesses and dynamic programming. The algorithms run in O*((L(D+1))^(LD) * D^D) and O*(2^C) time, showing that both parameterizations are fixed-parameter tractable. We complement the upper bounds by (matching) lower bounds based on ETH and Set Cover. Moreover, we prove the absence of polynomial kernels. For BSR, we consider programs involving t different threads. We restrict the analysis to computations where the write permission changes s times between the threads. BSR asks whether a given configuration is reachable via such an s-stage computation. When parameterized by P, the maximum size of a thread, and t, the interesting observation is that the problem has a large number of difficult instances. Formally, we show that there is no polynomial kernel, no compression algorithm that reduces the size of the data domain D or the number of stages s to a polynomial dependence on P and t. This indicates that symbolic methods may be harder to find for this problem.

We investigate the languages recognized by well-structured transition systems (WSTS) with upward and downward compatibility. Our first result shows that, under very mild assumptions, every two disjoint WSTS languages are regular separable: There is a regular language containing one of them and being disjoint from the other. As a consequence, if a language as well as its complement are both recognized by WSTS, then they are necessarily regular. In particular, no subclass of WSTS languages beyond the regular languages is closed under complement. Our second result shows that for Petri nets, the complexity of the backwards coverability algorithm yields a bound on the size of the regular separator. We complement it by a lower bound construction.

We study the size and the complexity of computing finite state automata (FSA) representing and approximating the downward and the upward closure of Petri net languages with coverability as the acceptance condition. We show how to construct an FSA recognizing the upward closure of a Petri net language in doubly-exponential time, and therefore the size is at most doubly exponential. For downward closures, we prove that the size of the minimal automata can be non-primitive recursive. In the case of BPP nets, a well-known subclass of Petri nets, we show that an FSA accepting the downward/upward closure can be constructed in exponential time. Furthermore, we consider the problem of checking whether a simple regular language is included in the downward/upward closure of a Petri net/BPP net language. We show that this problem is EXPSPACE-complete (resp. NP-complete) in the case of Petri nets (resp. BPP nets). Finally, we show that it is decidable whether a Petri net language is upward/downward closed. To this end, we prove that one can decide whether a given regular language is a subset of a Petri net coverability language., Comment: The conference version of this paper has been published in the proceedings of the 42nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, MFCS 2017

Bounded context switching (BCS) is an under-approximate method for finding violations to safety properties in shared memory concurrent programs. Technically, BCS is a reachability problem that is known to be NP-complete. Our contribution is a parameterized analysis of BCS. The first result is an algorithm that solves BCS when parameterized by the number of context switches (cs) and the size of the memory (m) in O*(m^(cs)2^(cs)). This is achieved by creating instances of the easier problem Shuff which we solve via fast subset convolution. We also present a lower bound for BCS of the form m^o(cs / log(cs)), based on the exponential time hypothesis. Interestingly, closing the gap means settling a conjecture that has been open since FOCS'07. Further, we prove that BCS admits no polynomial kernel. Next, we introduce a measure, called scheduling dimension, that captures the complexity of schedules. We study BCS parameterized by the scheduling dimension (sdim) and show that it can be solved in O*((2m)^(4sdim)4^t)$, where t is the number of threads. We consider variants of the problem for which we obtain (matching) upper and lower bounds.

We study linear time model checking of collapsible higher-order pushdown systems (CPDS) of order 2 (manipulating stack of stacks) against MSO and PDL (propositional dynamic logic with converse and loop) enhanced with push/pop matching relations. To capture these linear time behaviours with matchings, we propose order-2 nested words. These graphs consist of a word structure augmented with two binary matching relations, one for each order of stack, which relate a push with matching pops (or collapse) on the respective stack. Due to the matching relations, satisfiability and model checking are undecidable. Hence we propose an under-approximation, bounding the number of times an order-1 push can be popped. With this under-approximation, which still allows unbounded stack height, we get decidability for satisfiability and model checking of both MSO and PDL. The problems are ExpTime-Complete for PDL.

We study the computational and descriptional complexity of the following transformation: Given a one-counter automaton (OCA) A, construct a nondeterministic finite automaton (NFA) B that recognizes an abstraction of the language L(A): its (1) downward closure, (2) upward closure, or (3) Parikh image. For the Parikh image over a fixed alphabet and for the upward and downward closures, we find polynomial-time algorithms that compute such an NFA. For the Parikh image with the alphabet as part of the input, we find a quasi-polynomial time algorithm and prove a completeness result: we construct a sequence of OCA that admits a polynomial-time algorithm iff there is one for all OCA. For all three abstractions, it was previously unknown if appropriate NFA of sub-exponential size exist.

We address the model checking problem for shared memory concurrent programs modeled as multi-pushdown systems. We consider here boolean programs with a finite number of threads and recursive procedures. It is well-known that the model checking problem is undecidable for this class of programs. In this paper, we investigate the decidability and the complexity of this problem under the assumption of bounded context-switching defined by Qadeer and Rehof, and of phase-boundedness proposed by La Torre et al. On the model checking of such systems against temporal logics and in particular branching time logics such as the modal $\mu$-calculus or CTL has received little attention. It is known that parity games, which are closely related to the modal $\mu$-calculus, are decidable for the class of bounded-phase systems (and hence for bounded-context switching as well), but with non-elementary complexity (Seth). A natural question is whether this high complexity is inevitable and what are the ways to get around it. This paper addresses these questions and unfortunately, and somewhat surprisingly, it shows that branching model checking for MPDSs is inherently an hard problem with no easy solution. We show that parity games on MPDS under phase-bounding restriction is non-elementary. Our main result shows that model checking a $k$ context bounded MPDS against a simple fragment of CTL, consisting of formulas that whose temporal operators come from the set ${\EF, \EX}$, has a non-elementary lower bound.