Search

The presence of microalgae affects water quality and beneficial uses of surface freshwaters. Chitosan with proven potential for harvesting specific microalgae species from their culture medium to produce biofuels and bioproducts also appears promising for efficient removal of mixed microalgae species from surface freshwaters. The main focus of the present study was on removal of mixed microalgae species using chitosan as a coagulant to help improve water quality. Important operational parameters were optimized for economical microalgae removal. The microalgae cells, chlorophyll-a, total nitrogen, and total phosphorous removal efficiency were 82.06%, 89.90%, 69.32%, and 44.01%, respectively, at an optimum chitosan dose of 10 mg/L, pH 8, slow mixing time 7 min, slow mixing rate 30 rpm, and settling time of 15 min. The results show that chitosan coagulation efficiently removed mixed microalgae species from surface freshwater with significant improvement in water quality and recovery of algal biomass for other beneficial applications.

With realizing the potential of algal biomass as a good natural resource for the harnessing of valuable bioproducts, algal biomass production has gained a lot of interest in recent years. However, due to some limitations such as low harvesting efficiency, higher nutrient supply, and high water requirement, the production of algal biomass is uneconomical. Over the past several years, researchers are continuously working on growing algae as a biofilm for easy microalgae harvesting, concentration of algal biomass to a great extent, and requiring less quantity of water as compared to other microalgae cultivation methods. Most of the documented studies have been carried out on either use of algal biomass for tertiary treatment of wastewater or cultivation and harvesting of algal biomass for biofuel production. Limited research studies have documented other applications of the algal biofilm system. The present review paper summarizes the current knowledge on various factors affecting microalgae growth, development of algal biofilm, and operation of algal biofilm systems to help properly understand and optimize these factors for better economics, more positive environmental impacts, and successful potential applications of the attached growth systems. The important factors include the structure of algal biofilms, EPS matrix, supporting materials, nutrient availability, environmental conditions, and biofilm thickness and harvesting frequency. The potential applications such as wastewater treatment, CO2 sequestration, microalgae–microbial fuel cell, large-scale biomass production, and water quality improvement are also discussed.

Microalgae with wide range of commercial applications have attracted a lot of attention of the researchers in the last few decades. However, microalgae utilization is not economically sustainable due to high cost of harvesting. A wide range of solid - liquid separation techniques are available for microalgae harvesting. The techniques include coagulation and flocculation, flotation, centrifugation and filtration or a combination of various techniques. Despite the importance of harvesting to the economics and energy balance, there is no universal harvesting technique for microalgae. Therefore, this review focuses on assessing technical, economical and application potential of various harvesting techniques so as to allow selection of an appropriate technology for cost effectively harvesting of microalgae from their culture medium. Various harvesting and concentrating techniques of microalgae were reviewed to suggest order of suitability of the techniques for four main microalgae applications i.e biofuel, human and animal food, high valued products, and water quality restoration. For deciding the order of suitability, a comparative analysis of various harvesting techniques based on the six common criterions (i.e biomass quality, cost, biomass quantity, processing time, species specific and toxicity) has been done. Based on the order of various techniques vis-a-vis various criteria and preferred order of criteria for various applications, order of suitability of harvesting techniques for various applications has been decided. Among various harvesting techniques, coagulation and flocculation, centrifugation and filtration were found to be most suitable for considered applications. These techniques may be used alone or in combination for increasing the harvesting efficiency.

The effects of key nutrients iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), zinc (Zn), cobalt (Co), and their combinations were investigated on the total methanogenic activity (TMA) and total sulfidogenic activity (TSA) of biomass metabolizing synthetic sulfate laden organics (COD/SO42− ratio 3.5) in batch assays. In Phase I of the study, TMA and TSA were assessed twice for four feed changes in Cycle-I and Cycle-II. Nutrient combinations Fe–Co, Fe–Ni–Zn, Ni–Zn–Co and Zn have shown maximum TMA and/or TSA. Antagonistic effects of Ni on Co uptake by methane producing bacteria (MPB) and Zn uptake by sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) were observed. In Phase II study, sustainability of effects of nutrients for best combinations was assessed in long duration study involving 10 feed changes. Assays with Fe and Co supplementation have shown maximum stimulation of MPB and SRB.

The effect of molybdate, a sulfate analog, on the total methanogenic activity (TMA) and total sulfidogenic activity (TSA) of biomass metabolizing synthetic sucrose based substrate containing sulfate was investigated in batch assays. In Phase I of the study, TMA and TSA were assessed twice for four feed changes at a chemical oxygen demand to sulfate ( COD / SO 4 2 - ) ratio of 3.5. In Phase II, long-term experiments were conducted for 10–13 feed changes with varying chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration, sulfate concentration, COD / SO 4 2 - ratio, molybdate dose and biomass with different growth histories. Assays with 3 mM molybdate showed TSA inhibition over 85%. Dose dependency was observed for sulfate concentration, COD / SO 4 2 - ratio, and biomass history. The minimum concentration that gave over 93% TSA inhibition was 0.25 mM. However, intermediate concentrations of molybdate inhibited methane producing bacteria (MPB) activity. TMA stimulation was observed at 0.75–2.0 mM molybdate.