25 results on '"S. Litiere"'
Search Results
2. A transatlantic perspective on the integration of immuno-oncology prognostic and predictive biomarkers in innovative clinical trial design
- Author
-
Denis Lacombe, Stephen M. Hewitt, Roberto Salgado, S. Litiere, Sabine Tejpar, M. Thurin, B. Conley, T. Lively, Marie Morfouace, Vassilis Golfinopoulos, and Katherine Hartmann
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Medical Oncology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Dosing schedules ,Neoplasms ,Internal medicine ,Biomarkers, Tumor ,Animals ,Humans ,Medicine ,Predictive biomarker ,Response rate (survey) ,Clinical Trials as Topic ,business.industry ,Clinical study design ,Cancer ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Immune therapy ,Clinical trial ,030104 developmental biology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Potential biomarkers ,business - Abstract
Immuno-therapeutics aim to activate the body's own immune system against cancer and are one of the most promising cancer treatment strategies, but currently limited by a variable response rate. Biomarkers may help to distinguish those patients most likely to respond to therapy; they may also help guide clinical decision making for combination therapies, dosing schedules, and determining progression versus relapse. However, there is a need to confirm such biomarkers in preferably prospective clinical trials before they can be used in practice. Accordingly, it is essential that clinical trials for immuno-therapeutics incorporate biomarkers. Here, focusing on the specific setting of immune therapies, we discuss both the scientific and logistical hurdles to identifying potential biomarkers and testing them in clinical trials.
- Published
- 2018
3. Evolution in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) among advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with pazopanib within EORTC 62043/62072 trials
- Author
-
Nathan Touati, S. Litiere, Alessandro Gronchi, A. Le Cesne, Lorenzo D'Ambrosio, E. De Maio, Ingrid M.E. Desar, W.T.A. van der Graaf, Antoine Italiano, Stefan Sleijfer, and Paolo G. Casali
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pathology ,business.industry ,Soft tissue sarcoma ,Hematology ,medicine.disease ,Pazopanib ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio ,business ,medicine.drug - Published
- 2017
4. Early discontinuation of PD-1 blockade upon achieving a complete or partial response in patients with advanced melanoma: the multicentre prospective Safe Stop trial
- Author
-
E. E. A. P. Mulder, K. de Joode, S. Litière, A. J. ten Tije, K. P. M. Suijkerbuijk, M. J. Boers-Sonderen, G. A. P. Hospers, J. W. B. de Groot, A. J. M. van den Eertwegh, M. J. B. Aarts, D. Piersma, R. S. van Rijn, E. Kapiteijn, G. Vreugdenhil, F. W. P. J. van den Berkmortel, E. Oomen-de Hoop, M. G. Franken, B. Ryll, P. Rutkowski, S. Sleijfer, J. B. A. G. Haanen, and A. A. M. van der Veldt
- Subjects
Melanoma ,Advanced and metastatic ,PD-1 blockade ,Response (complete or partial) ,Health-related quality of life ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background The introduction of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockers (i.e. nivolumab and pembrolizumab) has significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced melanoma. However, the long treatment duration (i.e. two years or longer) has a high impact on patients and healthcare systems in terms of (severe) toxicity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), resource use, and healthcare costs. While durable tumour responses have been observed and PD-1 blockade is discontinued on an individual basis, no consensus has been reached on the optimal treatment duration. The objective of the Safe Stop trial is to evaluate whether early discontinuation of first-line PD-1 blockade is safe in patients with advanced and metastatic melanoma who achieve a radiological response. Methods The Safe Stop trial is a nationwide, multicentre, prospective, single-arm, interventional study in the Netherlands. A total of 200 patients with advanced and metastatic cutaneous melanoma and a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) v1.1 will be included to early discontinue first-line monotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. The primary objective is the rate of ongoing responses at 24 months after discontinuation of PD-1 blockade. Secondary objectives include best overall and duration of response, need and outcome of rechallenge with PD-1 blockade, and changes in (serious) adverse events and HRQoL. The impact of treatment discontinuation on healthcare resource use, productivity losses, and hours of informal care will also be assessed. Results will be compared to those from patients with CR or PR who completed 24 months of treatment with PD-1 blockade and had an ongoing response at treatment discontinuation. It is hypothesised that it is safe to early stop first-line nivolumab or pembrolizumab at confirmed tumour response while improving HRQoL and reducing costs. Discussion From a patient, healthcare, and economic perspective, shorter treatment duration is preferred and overtreatment should be prevented. If early discontinuation of first-line PD-1 blockade appears to be safe, early discontinuation of PD-1 blockade may be implemented as the standard of care in a selected group of patients. Trial registration The Safe Stop trial has been registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), Trial NL7293 (old NTR ID: 7502), https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7293 . Date of registration September 30, 2018.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. 3401 Absence of progression, not extent of remission defines prognosis in soft tissue sarcoma - an analysis of the EORTC 62012 study
- Author
-
Viktor Grünwald, Eva Wardelmann, S. Litiere, Alessandro Gronchi, Ian Judson, W.T.A. van der Graaf, Christina Messiou, R. Young, and L. Michela
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Oncology ,business.industry ,Soft tissue sarcoma ,medicine ,medicine.disease ,business - Published
- 2015
6. 3439 Prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcoma patients with lung metastases only receiving first-line chemotherapy. An exploratory, retrospective analysis on fifteen trials of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC-STBSG)
- Author
-
Ian Judson, Alessandro Gronchi, Stefan Sleijfer, Eva Wardelmann, Bernd Kasper, Lars H. Lindner, Antoine Italiano, W.T.A. van der Graaf, S. Litiere, Sandrine Marreaud, and Hans Gelderblom
- Subjects
Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Lung ,business.industry ,Soft tissue sarcoma ,Soft tissue ,Cancer ,Bone Sarcoma ,medicine.disease ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Retrospective analysis ,First line chemotherapy ,business - Published
- 2015
7. The challenge of running trials in advanced angiosarcoma: A systematic review of the literature from EORTC/STBSG to guide the development of angiosarcoma-specific trials.
- Author
-
Dufresne A, Lindner LH, Striefler J, Kasper B, Van Houdt W, Litiere S, Marreaud S, Blay JY, D'Ambrosio L, and Stacchiotti S
- Subjects
- Humans, Immunotherapy methods, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Clinical Trials as Topic, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors therapeutic use, Hemangiosarcoma therapy, Hemangiosarcoma drug therapy, Hemangiosarcoma pathology
- Abstract
Introduction: While available systemic treatments have modest long term efficacy in advanced angiosarcoma, immunotherapy represents an interesting new therapeutic opportunity. To establish its benefit, it is required to conduct a clinical trial assessing its efficacy and toxicity compared to standard treatments., Material and Methods: This is a literature review from PubMed search., Results: Several systemic treatments (chemotherapy and TKI) are currently used in advanced angiosarcoma with ORR ranging from 12.5 to 68 % and PFS from 2 to 7 months. However, few randomized trials, mainly phase II, has been conducted to compare these treatments. While most centers propose doxorubicin containing regimens or paclitaxel in 1st or 2nd line, a high heterogeneity of regimens administered in this setting is observed even across sarcoma specialized centers with no consensual standard treatment. Encouraging signals of immunotherapy activity have been reported in angiosarcoma from several retrospective and phase II studies assessing anti-PD1 either alone or in combination with anti CTLA4 or TKI. Although cutaneous and head and neck location seems to benefit more from immunotherapy, response may be observed in any angiosarcoma subtype. In sarcoma in general and AS in particular, no biomarker has been clearly established to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy: high tumor mutational burden and presence of tertiary lymphoid structures are under assessment., Discussion: Even essential, developing a randomized clinical trial in AS struggles with the heterogeneity of the disease, the lack of consensual standard regimen, the uncertainty on optimal immunotherapy administration and the absence of established predictive biomarkers., Conclusion: International collaboration is essential to run randomized trial in advanced AS and asses the efficacy of immune therapy in this rare and heterogeneous disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Armelle Dufresne, Jana Striefler, Bernd Kasper, Saskia Litiere, Sandrine Marreaud: these authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. EORTC 2238 "De-Escalate": a pragmatic trial to revisit intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in the era of new androgen receptor pathway inhibitors.
- Author
-
Grisay G, Turco F, Litiere S, Fournier B, Patrikidou A, Gallardo E, McDermott R, Alanya A, Gillessen S, and Tombal B
- Abstract
The landscape of treating metastatic prostate cancer has evolved with the addition of Androgen Receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), significantly improving survival rates. However, prolonged use of these therapies introduces notable side effects, prompting a need to revisit intermittent treatment duration. The EORTC 2238 De-Escalate trial is a pragmatic trial seeking to reassess the role of intermittent therapy in patients undergoing maximal androgen blockade (MAB) for metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC), i.e., the combination of ADT with an ARPI, with the aims of reducing side effects, enhancing Quality of Life (QoL) and optimizing resource usage, while maintaining oncological benefits., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Grisay, Turco, Litiere, Fournier, Patrikidou, Gallardo, McDermott, Alanya, Gillessen and Tombal.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Attitudes of healthcare professionals and drug regulators about progression-free survival as endpoint in the advanced cancer setting.
- Author
-
Postmus D, Litiere S, Bogaerts J, Versluis J, Cornelissen JJ, and Pignatti F
- Subjects
- Humans, Progression-Free Survival, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Personnel, Delivery of Health Care, Disease-Free Survival, Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Purpose: To describe the attitudes of healthcare professionals and drug regulators about progression-free survival (PFS) as efficacy endpoint in clinical trials with patients with advanced cancer and to explore to what extent these attitudes influence the willingness to trade between PFS and toxicity., Methods: Cross-sectional survey with regulators from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and healthcare professionals (HCP) from the "Stichting Hemato-Oncologie voor Volwassenen Nederland" (HOVON) collaborative group and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Attitudes towards PFS were elicited using 5-point Likert items. The respondents' willingness to trade between PFS and grade 3 or 4 (G34) toxicity was assessed using the threshold technique and quantified in terms of their maximum acceptable risk (MAR)., Results: Responses were collected from 287 HCPs and 64 regulators with mainly clinical expertise. Attitudes towards PFS were often spread out in both groups and related to beliefs about PFS being a likely surrogate for clinical benefit, being an intrinsic benefit to be distinguished from OS, or on the importance given to OS. Being a regulator or holding stronger beliefs about PFS being a likely surrogate or an intrinsic benefit were associated with a higher MAR. Presence of a supportive trend in OS was stated as important but was not associated with MAR. There was agreement on the need to address bias in the adjudication of PFS and the need for improving communication to patients about meaning, strengths, and limitations of improvements in PFS., Conclusion: Attitudes towards PFS were spread out and were associated with individual differences in the willingness to trade between toxicity and PFS. There was agreement on the need to address bias in the adjudication of PFS and improving communication to patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. A CT-based radiomics classification model for the prediction of histological type and tumour grade in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RADSARC-R): a retrospective multicohort analysis.
- Author
-
Arthur A, Orton MR, Emsley R, Vit S, Kelly-Morland C, Strauss D, Lunn J, Doran S, Lmalem H, Nzokirantevye A, Litiere S, Bonvalot S, Haas R, Gronchi A, Van Gestel D, Ducassou A, Raut CP, Meeus P, Spalek M, Hatton M, Le Pechoux C, Thway K, Fisher C, Jones R, Huang PH, and Messiou C
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Adult, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Leiomyosarcoma pathology, Sarcoma pathology, Liposarcoma diagnostic imaging, Liposarcoma pathology, Soft Tissue Neoplasms pathology, Retroperitoneal Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background: Retroperitoneal sarcomas are tumours with a poor prognosis. Upfront characterisation of the tumour is difficult, and under-grading is common. Radiomics has the potential to non-invasively characterise the so-called radiological phenotype of tumours. We aimed to develop and independently validate a CT-based radiomics classification model for the prediction of histological type and grade in retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma., Methods: A retrospective discovery cohort was collated at our centre (Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK) and an independent validation cohort comprising patients recruited in the phase 3 STRASS study of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma. Patients aged older than 18 years with confirmed primary leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma proceeding to surgical resection with available contrast-enhanced CT scans were included. Using the discovery dataset, a CT-based radiomics workflow was developed, including manual delineation, sub-segmentation, feature extraction, and predictive model building. Separate probabilistic classifiers for the prediction of histological type and low versus intermediate or high grade tumour types were built and tested. Independent validation was then performed. The primary objective of the study was to develop radiomic classification models for the prediction of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma type and histological grade., Findings: 170 patients recruited between Oct 30, 2016, and Dec 23, 2020, were eligible in the discovery cohort and 89 patients recruited between Jan 18, 2012, and April 10, 2017, were eligible in the validation cohort. In the discovery cohort, the median age was 63 years (range 27-89), with 83 (49%) female and 87 (51%) male patients. In the validation cohort, median age was 59 years (range 33-77), with 46 (52%) female and 43 (48%) male patients. The highest performing model for the prediction of histological type had an area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 0·928 on validation, based on a feature set of radiomics and approximate radiomic volume fraction. The highest performing model for the prediction of histological grade had an AUROC of 0·882 on validation, based on a radiomics feature set., Interpretation: Our validated radiomics model can predict the histological type and grade of retroperitoneal sarcomas with excellent performance. This could have important implications for improving diagnosis and risk stratification in retroperitoneal sarcomas., Funding: Wellcome Trust, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group, the National Institutes for Health, and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AA reports funding from the Wellcome Trust paid to their institution. MRO, SD, and CM report funding paid to their institutions from the National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London. MRO reports funding from the Royal Marsden Cancer Charity to their institution. SD reports funding to their institution from Cancer Research UK. RH declares a previous role as the President of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (in 2021). AG reports grants from PharmaMar and Nanobiotic; consulting fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer, Lilly, PharmaMar, SpringWorks, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and honoraria from Deciphera. CPR reports royalties from UpTo Date. DVG reports grants from Elekta, IntraOp, and Orfit to their institution; consulting fees from Sanofi, Takeda, Novartis, and Merck; payment or honoraria from Elekta for lectures and support for attending meetings or travel; payment from Sanofi for expert testimony; and also declares a role in the Belgian College of Oncology and a research partnership with Elekta, Siemens, IntraOp and, MIM software, and a commercial partnership with Orfit, VisionRT, Philips, and Precisionxray. CLP reports payment from AstraZeneca to their institution for lectures; support for attending meetings and travel by Janseen and Ose Immunotherapeutics; and participation on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibbs and Varian. RJ reports grants from MSD and GSK and consulting fees from Adaptimmune, Astex, Athenex, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Blueprint, Clinigen, Eisai, Epizyme, Daichii, Deciphera, Immunedesign, Immunicum, Karma Oncology, Lilly, Merck, Mundipharma, PharmaMar, SpringWorks, Synox, Tracon, and UpTo Date. CM reports funding from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group to their institution; payment or honoraria from TeleMedicine Clinic academy and GE Healthcare; and support for meetings from International Cancer Imaging Society. CM also declares a role as trustee of the British Institution of Radiology and is a Fellow of the International Cancer Imaging Society. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) as a Biomarker of Tumour Response: Imaging-Pathology Correlation in Patients with Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer (EORTC 1423).
- Author
-
Jackson A, Pathak R, deSouza NM, Liu Y, Jacobs BKM, Litiere S, Urbanowicz-Nijaki M, Julie C, Chiti A, Theysohn J, Ayuso JR, Stroobants S, and Waterton JC
- Abstract
Background: Tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a putative pharmacodynamic/response biomarker but the relationship between drug-induced effects on the ADC and on the underlying pathology has not been adequately defined. Hypothesis: Changes in ADC during early chemotherapy reflect underlying histological markers of tumour response as measured by tumour regression grade (TRG). Methods: Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study. Baseline, 14 days, and pre-surgery MRI were performed per study protocol. Surgical resection was performed in 23 of the enrolled patients; imaging-pathological correlation was obtained from 39 lesions from 21 patients. Results: There was no evidence of correlation between TRG and ADC changes at day 14 (study primary endpoint), and no significant correlation with other ADC metrics. In scans acquired one week prior to surgery, there was no significant correlation between ADC metrics and percentage of viable tumour, percentage necrosis, percentage fibrosis, or Ki67 index. Conclusions: Our hypothesis was not supported by the data. The lack of meaningful correlation between change in ADC and TRG is a robust finding which is not explained by variability or small sample size. Change in ADC is not a proxy for TRG in metastatic colorectal cancer.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Preoperative Radiotherapy in Patients With Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: EORTC-62092 Trial (STRASS) Versus Off-trial (STREXIT) Results.
- Author
-
Callegaro D, Raut CP, Ajayi T, Strauss D, Bonvalot S, Ng D, Stoeckle E, Fairweather M, Rutkowski P, van Houdt WJ, Gelderblom H, Sangalli C, Hayes A, Honoré C, Gladdy RA, Fau M, Haas R, Tzanis D, Miah AB, Chung P, Baldini EH, Marreaud S, Litiere S, Swallow CJ, and Gronchi A
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Retroperitoneal Space, Proportional Hazards Models, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Sarcoma radiotherapy, Sarcoma surgery, Liposarcoma radiotherapy, Liposarcoma surgery, Retroperitoneal Neoplasms radiotherapy, Retroperitoneal Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on abdominal recurrence-free survival (ARFS) in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma treated in the EORTC-STBSG-62092 (STRASS) phase 3 randomized controlled trial (STRASS cohort) and off-trial (STREXIT cohort) and to pool STRASS and STREXIT data to test the hypothesis that RT improves ARFS in patients with liposarcoma., Background: The STRASS trial did not show any difference in ARFS between patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy+surgery (RT+S) versus surgery alone (S)., Methods: All consecutive adult patients not enrolled in STRASS and underwent curative-intent surgery for a primary retroperitoneal sarcoma with or without preoperative RT between 2012 and 2017 (STRASS recruiting period) among ten STRASS-recruiting centres formed the STREXIT cohort. The effect of RT in STREXIT was explored with a propensity score (PS)-matching analysis. Primary endpoint was ARFS defined as macroscopically incomplete resection or abdominal recurrence or death of any cause, whichever occurred first., Results: STRASS included 266 patients, STREXIT included 831 patients (727 after excluding patients who received preoperative chemotherapy, 202 after 1:1 PS-matching). The effect of RT on ARFS in STRASS and 1:1 PS-matched STREXIT cohorts, overall and in patients with liposarcoma, was similar. In the pooled cohort analysis, RT administration was associated with better ARFS in patients with liposarcoma [N=321, hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.89]. In particular, patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 dedifferentiated liposarcoma (G1-2 DDLPS, n=266) treated with RT+S had better ARFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97) while patients with G3 DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma had not. At the current follow-up, there was no association between RT and overall survival or distant metastases-free survival., Conclusions: In this study, preoperative RT was associated with better ARFS in patients with primary well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 DDLPS., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Meta-Analysis of the Test-Retest Repeatability of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Standardized Uptake Values: Implications for Assessment of Tumor Response.
- Author
-
Shankar LK, Huang E, Litiere S, Hoekstra OS, Schwartz L, Collette S, Boellaard R, Bogaerts J, Seymour L, and deVries EGE
- Subjects
- Humans, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods, Reproducibility of Results, Positron-Emission Tomography methods, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 metabolism, Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Neoplasms metabolism
- Abstract
Purpose: Currently, guidelines for PET with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) interpretation for assessment of therapy response in oncology primarily involve visual evaluation of FDG-PET/CT scans. However, quantitative measurements of the metabolic activity in tumors may be even more useful in evaluating response to treatment. Guidelines based on such measurements, including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Criteria and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors, have been proposed. However, more rigorous analysis of response criteria based on FDG-PET measurements is needed to adopt regular use in practice., Experimental Design: Well-defined boundaries of repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative measurements to discriminate noise from true signal changes are a needed initial step. An extension of the meta-analysis from de Langen and colleagues (2012) of the test-retest repeatability of quantitative FDG-PET measurements, including mean, maximum, and peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak, respectively), was performed. Data from 11 studies in the literature were used to estimate the relationship between the variance in test-retest measurements with uptake level and various study-level, patient-level, and lesion-level characteristics., Results: Test-retest repeatability of percentage fluctuations for all three types of SUV measurement (max, mean, and peak) improved with higher FDG uptake levels. Repeatability in all three SUV measurements varied for different lesion locations. Worse repeatability in SUVmean was also associated with higher tumor volumes., Conclusions: On the basis of these results, recommendations regarding SUV measurements for assessing minimal detectable changes based on repeatability and reproducibility are proposed. These should be applied to differentiate between response categories for a future set of FDG-PET-based criteria that assess clinically significant changes in tumor response., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Activity of Cabazitaxel in Metastatic or Inoperable Locally Advanced Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: A Phase 2 Study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG).
- Author
-
Sanfilippo R, Hayward RL, Musoro J, Benson C, Leahy MG, Brunello A, Blay JY, Steeghs N, Desar IME, Ali N, Hervieu A, Thway K, Marreaud S, Litiere S, and Kasper B
- Subjects
- Humans, Disease-Free Survival, Soft Tissue Neoplasms mortality, Sarcoma pathology, Bone Neoplasms, Osteosarcoma, Liposarcoma drug therapy
- Abstract
Importance: Treatment options for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) are limited. New drugs are required., Objective: To assess whether cabazitaxel demonstrated sufficient antitumor activity in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DDLPS to justify further investigation in a phase 3 setting., Design, Setting, and Participants: This international multicenter, open-label single-arm phase 2 trial was conducted at 10 institutions in 4 European countries from March 2015 to March 2019. Eligible patients had to have metastatic or locally advanced histologically proven DDLPS with evidence of disease progression within the past 6 months and had to have received no more than 1 previous line of chemotherapy., Interventions: After mandatory central review of tumor blocks, if the DDLPS diagnosis was confirmed, patients started treatment within 72 hours after registration. Cabazitaxel was administered at a dose of 25 mg/m2 IV infusion over 1 hour every 21 days until intolerance, progression, or withdrawal of consent., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 weeks per RECIST 1.1. Based on a Simon 2-stage design, at least 4 of 17 (stage 1) and 11 of 37 (stage 2) eligible and evaluable patients who were progression free at 12 weeks were needed. The final analysis report was completed on November 17, 2021., Results: Forty patients were registered, with 2 patients being ineligible. The number of cycles ranged from 1 to 30, with a median of 5; 26 patients (65%) received at least 4 cycles of cabazitaxel. Progression-free survival at 12 weeks was 55%, achieving the primary study end point. At a median follow-up of 21.6 months, median PFS was 6 months and median OS 21 months. Response rate (RR) was 8% with 1 clinical response (CR) and 2 partial responses (PR). Twenty-three (60.5%) patients had a stable disease (SD). Disease control (PR+SD) was achieved in 26 patients (68%)., Conclusions and Relevance: This nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trial met its primary end point, with 21 of 38 patients (55%) being progression free at 12 weeks. These results suggest important activity of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced DDLPS. The drug is worth being further studied in these tumors in a phase 3 setting.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. First-line chemotherapy in advanced intra-abdominal well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma: An EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group retrospective analysis.
- Author
-
Stacchiotti S, Van der Graaf WTA, Sanfilippo RG, Marreaud SI, Van Houdt WJ, Judson IR, Gronchi A, Gelderblom H, Litiere S, and Kasper B
- Subjects
- Adult, Antibiotics, Antineoplastic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Doxorubicin, Humans, Ifosfamide, Lipopolysaccharides therapeutic use, Retrospective Studies, Bone Neoplasms drug therapy, Liposarcoma drug therapy, Osteosarcoma drug therapy, Sarcoma pathology
- Abstract
Background: No prospective trial with anthracycline-based chemotherapy has individually assessed response in a well-differentiated (WD)/dedifferentiated (DD) liposarcoma patient cohort. We conducted a retrospective analysis of first-line chemotherapy in liposarcoma of intra-abdominal origin (IA-LPS) in patients who had entered the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) trials., Methods: We searched for all adult patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for advanced IA-LPS in the EORTC STBSG phase 2 and 3 trials from 1978. Treatment was aggregated into 5 groups: anthracycline alone, ifosfamide alone, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (D+IFO), doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/dacarbazine, and "other" (brostallicin, trabectedin). Response was assessed prospectively by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or World Health Organization criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were computed by Kaplan-Meier method., Results: A total of 109 patients with IA-LPS from 13 trials were identified (104 evaluable for response). Overall, there were 10/109 (9.2%) responders: 3/48 (6.3%) in the anthracycline alone group, 2/15 (13%) in the ifosfamide alone group, and 4/18 (22%) in the D+IFO group. At the 10-month median follow-up (interquartile range, 6-24), the median OS was 19 months (95% CI, 15-21) and median PFS 4 months (95% CI, 3-6). D+IFO achieved a not statistically significant longer median PFS (12 months) and median OS (31 months) than observed with other regimens. Univariate/multivariate analysis did not identify prognostic factors., Conclusions: Cytotoxic chemotherapy, in particular anthracycline alone, had marginal activity in advanced IA-LPS. Ifosfamide-containing regimens showed higher activity, although it was not statistically significant and in a small number of cases, with the combination of doxorubicin and ifosfamide appearing to be the more active regimen available in fit patients. This series provides a benchmark for future trials on new drugs in WD/DD liposarcoma., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Evaluation of the use and efficacy of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in angiosarcoma: a multicentre study.
- Author
-
Constantinidou A, Sauve N, Stacchiotti S, Blay JY, Vincenzi B, Grignani G, Rutkowski P, Guida M, Hindi N, Klein A, Thibaud V, Sufliarsky J, Desar I, Steeghs N, Litiere S, Gelderblom H, and Jones RL
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Hemangiosarcoma drug therapy, Sarcoma drug therapy
- Abstract
Introduction: Angiosarcomas constitute approximately 2% to 3% of all soft tissue sarcomas, are characterised by an aggressive clinical behaviour and poor outcome. Optimal management of localised angiosarcomas consists of complete surgical resection with or without radiation. However, due to the infiltrating nature of this disease, complete resection is often not possible. Despite optimal management, the outcome of patients with localised disease remains poor. The role of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in angiosarcomas remains undefined. The aim of this study is to document the outcome of patients treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and assess the feasibility of performing a prospective trial by evaluating the number of patients treated at sarcoma referral centres., Methods: A retrospective search within participating EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) sites for patients treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy was made. Patients treated between January 2007 and January 2016 were included., Results: A total of 15 institutions participated and 86 patients were evaluable, 43 were treated with neoadjuvant, 27 with adjuvant chemotherapy and 16 with both. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up from diagnosis was 4.6 years. Median overall survival (OS) was 4.9 years (2.9 N) and the percentage alive at 4 years was 57.9 (45.5 to 68.4). The median disease-free survival was 1.4 years (0.9 to 1.7) and the percentage disease-free at 4 years was 26.8% (17.9 to 36.5)., Conclusion: The outcome of angiosarcoma patients treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in this case series compares favourably with previously published data. Due to the aggressive nature of angiosarcoma, a prospective trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Activity and safety of the multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour after treatment with imatinib and sunitinib: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase II trial 1317 'CaboGIST'.
- Author
-
Schöffski P, Mir O, Kasper B, Papai Z, Blay JY, Italiano A, Benson C, Kopeckova K, Ali N, Dileo P, LeCesne A, Menge F, Cousin S, Wardelmann E, Wozniak A, Marreaud S, Litiere S, Zaffaroni F, Nzokirantevye A, Vanden Bempt I, and Gelderblom H
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anilides administration & dosage, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms pathology, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors secondary, Humans, Imatinib Mesylate administration & dosage, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Pyridines administration & dosage, Sunitinib administration & dosage, Survival Rate, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm drug effects, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms drug therapy, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors drug therapy, Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Salvage Therapy
- Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is commonly treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but most patients ultimately develop secondary resistance. Cabozantinib, a multi-targeted TKI inhibitor, has activity in patient-derived GIST mouse xenograft models and can overcome compensatory MET signalling occurring on TKI treatment. European Organisation for Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1317 'CaboGIST' assessed the safety and activity of cabozantinib in patients with GIST who had progressed on imatinib and sunitinib., Methods: In this multi-center, open label, single arm phase II study, eligible GIST patients received oral cabozantinib (60 mg) once daily. Primary end-point was the progression-free survival rate at 12 weeks assessed by the local investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1·1. If at least 21 of the first 41 eligible and evaluable patients were progression-free at week 12, the activity of cabozantinib was sufficient to warrant further exploration according to the A'Hern one-stage study design., Findings: A total of 50 eligible patients started treatment between 02/2017 and 08/2018, including four (8%) still continuing cabozantinib at clinical cut-off (09/2019). The number of 3-weekly treatment cycles ranged from 1 to 30. Among the first 41 eligible and evaluable patients, 24 were progression-free at week 12 (58·5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 42·0-74·0%). Among all 50 patients, 30 were progression-free at week 12 (60%, 95% CI 45-74%). Seven patients achieved a partial response (14%, 95% CI 6-27%), and 34 had stable disease (68%, 95% CI 53-80%) as best response. Progression was seen in eight patients (16%, 95% CI 7-29%), and one was not evaluable. Disease control was achieved in 41 patients (82%, 95% CI 69-91%). Median progression-free survival was 5·5 months (95% CI 3·6-6·9). The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (76%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (60%), fatigue (50%), hypertension (42%), weight loss (40%) and oral mucositis (30%), with 32 (64%) patients requiring dose reductions, 27 (54%) having treatment interruptions and no cabozantinib-related deaths observed., Interpretation: EORTC 1317 met its primary end-point, with 24/41 patients being progression-free at week 12 of treatment. The objective response was 14% with an encouraging disease control rate of 82%. Results of this trial confirm preclinical findings and warrant further exploration of cabozantinib in GIST., Clinical Trial Numbers: EORTC 1317, NCT02216578, EudraCT 2014-000501-13., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Quality of surgery and surgical reporting for patients with primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours participating in the EORTC STBSG 62024 adjuvant imatinib study.
- Author
-
Hohenberger P, Bonvalot S, van Coevorden F, Rutkowski P, Stoeckle E, Olungu C, Litiere S, Wardelmann E, Gronchi A, and Casali P
- Subjects
- Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Combined Modality Therapy, Digestive System Surgical Procedures mortality, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms drug therapy, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms pathology, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors drug therapy, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors pathology, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local surgery, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Digestive System Surgical Procedures standards, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms surgery, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors surgery, Imatinib Mesylate therapeutic use, Postoperative Complications, Quality of Health Care, Quality of Life
- Abstract
Background: EORTC (European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer) 62024 is a phase III randomised trial evaluating adjuvant imatinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) and no evidence of residual disease after surgery in 908 patients from 11 countries participated. As surgical treatment aspects (tumour rupture and incomplete resection) contribute to the risk of recurrence, the data of primary surgery were reviewed., Methods: The surgical record, local pathology report and a surgical questionnaire on details of the operation had to be completed when patients entered the study. Surgeons from 5 countries, covering 8 languages, reviewed the full set of data being available from 793 patients (87.3%)., Results: A known GIST was the reason for surgery in only 58% of the cases, and 12% of the patients were treated as an emergency. The R0-resection rate was 87%. The extent of resection was local excision in 17%, segmental resection in 59%, full-organ resection in 11% and multivisceral resection in 11%, with lymphadenectomy performed in 24% of the patients. Shelling out of the tumour was performed in 9.7%, and the proportion of tumours removed in parts was higher in the endoscopy/laparoscopy group. The incidence of tumour rupture (representing M1) was 9%. The consistency between preoperative and intraoperative findings was 82%. The postoperative complication rate was 7.3%., Conclusion: The standardisation of surgery in this study was inferior. Given the review data, 18% of the patients should not have participated in the trial. Quality of surgery and improperly reported intraoperative details might influence the trial results. A detailed surgical questionnaire filled out by the surgeon is mandatory before entering the patient in an adjuvant trial in GIST., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. The impact of chemotherapy on survival of patients with extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma: revisiting the results of the EORTC-STBSG 62931 randomised trial.
- Author
-
Pasquali S, Pizzamiglio S, Touati N, Litiere S, Marreaud S, Kasper B, Gelderblom H, Stacchiotti S, Judson I, Dei Tos AP, Verderio P, Casali PG, Woll PJ, and Gronchi A
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Doxorubicin administration & dosage, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Ifosfamide administration & dosage, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Sarcoma drug therapy, Sarcoma pathology, Survival Rate, Young Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant mortality, Extremities pathology, Neoadjuvant Therapy mortality, Nomograms, Sarcoma mortality, Torso pathology
- Abstract
Background: This study was aimed at determining whether patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS), as identified using the nomogram Sarculator, benefitted from adjuvant chemotherapy in the EORTC-STBSG 62931 randomised controlled trial (RCT), which failed to detect an impact for adjuvant doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (Adj) over observation (Obs)., Methods: Patients with extremity and trunk wall STS in the EORTC-STBSG 62931 RCT were analysed (N = 290/351). Ten-year predicted probability of overall survival (pr-OS) was calculated using the prognostic nomogram Sarculator. Patients were grouped into three categories of predicted pr-OS: high (pr-OS>66%), intermediate (51
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. A transatlantic perspective on the integration of immuno-oncology prognostic and predictive biomarkers in innovative clinical trial design.
- Author
-
Morfouace M, Hewitt SM, Salgado R, Hartmann K, Litiere S, Tejpar S, Golfinopoulos V, Lively T, Thurin M, Conley B, and Lacombe D
- Subjects
- Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Medical Oncology methods, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor immunology, Neoplasms immunology, Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Immuno-therapeutics aim to activate the body's own immune system against cancer and are one of the most promising cancer treatment strategies, but currently limited by a variable response rate. Biomarkers may help to distinguish those patients most likely to respond to therapy; they may also help guide clinical decision making for combination therapies, dosing schedules, and determining progression versus relapse. However, there is a need to confirm such biomarkers in preferably prospective clinical trials before they can be used in practice. Accordingly, it is essential that clinical trials for immuno-therapeutics incorporate biomarkers. Here, focusing on the specific setting of immune therapies, we discuss both the scientific and logistical hurdles to identifying potential biomarkers and testing them in clinical trials., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Do patients whose tumor achieved a pathological response relapse at specific sites? A substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG-1-00 trial.
- Author
-
Aalders KC, Touati N, Tryfonidis K, Annonay M, Litiere S, Bergh J, Bodmer A, Cameron DA, and Bonnefoi HR
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Breast Neoplasms therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Neoplasm Grading, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neoplasm Staging, Odds Ratio, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology
- Abstract
Purpose: To determine the sites of first distant relapse in patients with or without pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients enrolled in the EORTC 10994/BIG-1-00 trial., Methods: We included patients enrolled in the EORTC 10994/BIG-1-00 trial who received at least one chemotherapy cycle before surgery and who had been diagnosed with a distant relapse. pCR was defined as no evidence of residual invasive cancer in the primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes with or without residual ductal carcinoma in situ. Site of first distant relapse was categorized as 'soft tissue,' 'visceral,' 'skeletal,' 'central nervous system (CNS),' and 'other.' The association between relapse site and achievement of pCR was assessed using multivariate logistic regression models for molecular subtypes classification and preceding locoregional recurrence., Results: The study included 383 (21%) eligible patients out of the 1856 randomized, of whom 28 (7%) had achieved pCR. Median follow-up was 5.4 years. Achievement of pCR was associated with a trend towards a decreased presentation of skeletal metastases [21% (pCR) vs. 50% (non-pCR), OR 0.32, adjusted p value = 0.071] and an increase in the proportion of patients with CNS metastases as first distant relapse site (21% vs. 9%, OR 2.39, adjusted p value = 0.183). Patients with pCR were more likely to present with only one relapse location category when compared to non-pCR (86% vs. 69%)., Conclusion: Patients that achieved a pCR appeared less likely to present with skeletal metastases and more frequently presented with CNS metastases as first site of distant relapse, even after adjustment for molecular subtypes.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Characterisation of multifocal breast cancer using the 70-gene signature in clinical low-risk patients enrolled in the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial.
- Author
-
Aalders KC, Kuijer A, Straver ME, Slaets L, Litiere S, Viale G, Van't Veer LJ, Glas AM, Delorenzi M, van Dalen T, Tryfonidis K, Piccart MJ, Cardoso F, and Rutgers EJ
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Distribution, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Breast Neoplasms therapy, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Gene Expression Profiling methods, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic genetics, Genome, Human, Humans, Lymphatic Metastasis, Mastectomy statistics & numerical data, Middle Aged, Receptor, ErbB-2 metabolism, Receptors, Estrogen metabolism, Receptors, Progesterone metabolism, Transcriptome genetics, Young Adult, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Genes, Neoplasm genetics
- Abstract
Background: In multifocal breast cancer, guidelines recommend basing adjuvant systemic treatment decisions on characteristics of the largest lesion, disregarding multifocality as an independent prognosticator. We assessed the association between multifocal disease and both the 70-gene signature (70-GS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in clinical low-risk breast cancer patients enrolled in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10041/BIG 03-04 Microarray In Node-negative and 1 to 3 positive lymph node Disease may Avoid ChemoTherapy (MINDACT) trial., Patients and Methods: The analysed population consisted of enrolled patients in the MINDACT trial with clinical low-risk disease, defined by a modified Adjuvant! Online cut-off for the 10-year risk of recurrent disease or death. Eligibility criteria of MINDACT dictate that patients with multifocal disease could be included if the different lesions had similar pathological characteristics. The presence of multifocal disease was deducted from the case report form (CRF)-question for sum of diameter for all invasive tumour foci. Clinicopathological characteristics and gene expression of patients with unifocal and multifocal (largest lesion) disease were compared. Subsequently, the association between multifocal disease and the 70-GS was evaluated as well as the association between multifocality and 5-year DMFS., Results: The study included 3090 clinical low-risk patients with unifocal and 238 patients with multifocal disease. Apart from a higher prevalence of lobular tumours (21.8% versus 10.8%, by local pathology), we did not observe differences in baseline characteristics between multifocal and unifocal tumours. Patients with multifocal tumours were more likely to be at high genomic risk as compared to patients with unifocal tumours (22.7% versus 17.3%, odds ratio [OR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.07, P = 0.038). We did not find a significant association between tumour focality and DMFS (97.1% for unifocal versus 96.9% for multifocal, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55, 95% CI 0.68-3.46, P = 0.172), nor a signal for a potential interaction between the prognostic effect of the 70-GS and focality of the tumour regarding DMFS., Conclusion: In the group of clinical low-risk MINDACT patients, multifocal tumours were more likely to have a high-risk 70-GS profile compared to unifocal tumours. We did not observe a significant interaction between multifocality and the 70-GS with respect to survival without distant metastasis in these patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Liquid biopsy-based clinical research in early breast cancer: The EORTC 90091-10093 Treat CTC trial.
- Author
-
Ignatiadis M, Rack B, Rothé F, Riethdorf S, Decraene C, Bonnefoi H, Dittrich C, Messina C, Beauvois M, Trapp E, Goulioti T, Tryfonidis K, Pantel K, Repollet M, Janni W, Piccart M, Sotiriou C, Litiere S, and Pierga JY
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Biomarkers, Tumor analysis, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm, Residual, Pilot Projects, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Trastuzumab therapeutic use, Biopsy methods, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating pathology
- Abstract
There is increasing evidence that breast cancer evolves over time under the selection pressure of systemic treatment. Today, treatment decisions in early breast cancer are based on primary tumour characteristics without considering the disease evolution. Chemoresistant micrometastatic disease is poorly characterised and thus it is not used in current clinical practice as a tool to personalise treatment approaches. The detection of chemoresistant circulating tumour cells (CTCs) has been shown to be associated with worse prognosis in early breast cancer. The ongoing Treat CTC trial is the first international, liquid biopsy-based trial evaluating the concept of targeting chemoresistant minimal residual disease: detection of CTCs following adjuvant chemotherapy (adjuvant cohort) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients who did not achieve pathological complete response (neoadjuvant cohort). This article presents the rational and design of this trial and the results of the pilot phase after 350 patients have been screened and provides insights that might provide information for future trials using the liquid biopsy approach as a tool towards precision medicine (NCT01548677)., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma: pooled analysis of two STBSG-EORTC phase III clinical trials.
- Author
-
Le Cesne A, Ouali M, Leahy MG, Santoro A, Hoekstra HJ, Hohenberger P, Van Coevorden F, Rutkowski P, Van Hoesel R, Verweij J, Bonvalot S, Steward WP, Gronchi A, Hogendoorn PCW, Litiere S, Marreaud S, Blay JY, and Van Der Graaf WTA
- Subjects
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Antibiotics, Antineoplastic therapeutic use, Doxorubicin therapeutic use, Sarcoma drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: The EORTC-STBSG coordinated two large trials of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Both studies failed to demonstrate any benefit on overall survival (OS). The aim of the analysis of these two trials was to identify subgroups of patients who may benefit from adjuvant CT., Patients and Methods: Individual patient data from two EORTC trials comparing doxorubicin-based CT to observation only in completely resected STS (large resection, R0/marginal resection, R1) were pooled. Prognostic factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Patient outcomes were subsequently compared between the two groups of patients according to each analyzed factor., Results: A total of 819 patients had been enrolled with a median follow-up of 8.2 years. Tumor size, high histological grade and R1 resection emerged as independent adverse prognostic factors for relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS. Adjuvant CT is an independent favorable prognostic factor for RFS but not for OS. A significant interaction between benefit of adjuvant CT and age, gender and R1 resection was observed for RFS and OS. Males and patients >40 years had a significantly better RFS in the treatment arms, while adjuvant CT was associated with a marginally worse OS in females and patients <40 years. Patients with R1 resection had a significantly better RFS and OS favoring adjuvant CT arms., Conclusion: Adjuvant CT is not associated with a better OS in young patients or in any pathology subgroup. Poor quality of initial surgery is the most important prognostic and predictive factor for utility of adjuvant CT in STS. Based on these data, we conclude that adjuvant CT for STS remains an investigational procedure and is not a routine standard of care., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Pazopanib in advanced desmoplastic small round cell tumours: a multi-institutional experience.
- Author
-
Frezza AM, Benson C, Judson IR, Litiere S, Marreaud S, Sleijfer S, Blay JY, Dewji R, Fisher C, van der Graaf W, and Hayward L
- Abstract
Background: We retrospectively reviewed data from nine pre-treated metastatic desmoplastic small round cell tumour (DSRCT) patients who received pazopanib., Patients and Methods: Three patients received pazopanib within the EORTC phase II 62043, three in the EORTC phase III 62072, and three in the context of UK named patient program., Results: Nine patients were retrieved from the databases, the median age was 30 years (range: 21-47), they were all males. All had received prior chemotherapy. At the time of treatment start, 4 patients (44%) had ECOG PS 0, 4 (44%) PS 1, 1 (11%) PS 2. Best response was partial response (PR) in 2/9 (22%) patients, stable disease (SD) in 5/9 (56%) and progressive disease (PD) in 2/9 (22%) with a clinical benefit rate (PR + SD > 12 weeks) of 78%. Median PFS and OS were 9.2 (95%CI: 0-23.2) and 15.4 (95%CI: 1.5-29.3) months respectively. With a median follow-up of 20 months, 2/9 (22%) patients are still alive, all progressed. The most common toxicities included neutropenia (G1-2 45%; G3-4 11%), anaemia (G1-2 45%), fatigue (G1-2 67%), diarrhoea (G1-2 45%; G3-4 11%), nausea (G1-2 45%), hypertension (G1-2 45%) and increase in liver enzymes (G1-2 34%; G3-4 11%). Three patients (34%) required a dose reduction. One of the patients discontinued treatment because of persistent increase in total bilirubin level, one due to patient's choice., Conclusion: In this series, pazopanib showed interesting activity in DSRCT patients who progressed after prior chemotherapy without major toxicity.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.