6 results on '"S. Eiter"'
Search Results
2. A framework for region-based instrumentation of energy consumption of program executions
- Author
-
Vlad Nae, Simon Ostermann, Thomas S. Eiter, and Radu Prodan
- Subjects
Software ,Green computing ,business.industry ,Computer science ,Instrumentation ,Embedded system ,Interface (computing) ,Code (cryptography) ,Energy consumption ,Instrumentation (computer programming) ,business ,Energy (signal processing) ,Efficient energy use - Abstract
Energy efficiency has become a key issue in computer science related research and development over the last years. While most approaches focus either on hardware or on software, we propose a solution incorporating both hardware and software enabling the measurement the energy consumption of code segments executed on physical machines. Our novel approach to energy measurement and instrumentation allows for both state-of-the-art offline analysis, and innovative online measurements associated with the code being executed. We present our modular architecture which shields the users from in-depth knowledge of their energy measurement hardware, and allows the development of code for measurement and instrumentation independent of each instruments' proprietary interface. Finally, we propose an efficient method for increasing the accuracy of measurements for low sampling rate measurement devices.
- Published
- 2013
3. Measuring farmland biodiversity
- Author
-
Herzog, F., Jeanneret, P., Ammari, Y., Angelova, S., Arndorfer, M., Bailey, D., Balázs, K., Báldi, A., Bogers, M., Bunce, R. H. G., Choisis, J. P., Cuming, David, Dennis, P., Dyman, T., Eiter, S., Elek, Z., Falusi, E., Fjellstad, W., Frank, T., Friedel, J. K., Garchi, S., Geijzendorffer, I. R., Gomiero, T., Jerkovich, G., Jongman, R. H. G., Kainz, M., Kakudidi, E., Kelemen, E., Kölliker, R., Kwikiriza, N., Kovács Hostyánszki, A., Last, L., Lüscher, G., Moreno, G., Nkwiine, C., Opio, J., Oschatz, M. L., Paoletti, M. G., Penksza, K., Pointereau, P., Riedel, S., Sarthou, J. P., Schneider, M. K., Siebrecht, N., Sommaggio, D., Stoyanova, S., Szerencsits, E., Szalkovski, O., Stefano Targetti, Davide Viaggi, Wilkes Allemann, J., Wolfrum, S., Yashchenko, S., Zanetti, T., Dynamiques Forestières dans l'Espace Rural (DYNAFOR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-École nationale supérieure agronomique de Toulouse (ENSAT), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT), AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (AGIR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Austrian Ministry for Science and Research, European Project: 227161,EC:FP7:KBBE,FP7-KBBE-2008-2B,BIOBIO(2009), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Toulouse-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Unité Mixte de Recherche AGroécologie-Innovations-TeRritoires (AGIR), École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville (ENSFEA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - INRA (FRANCE), Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse - Toulouse INP (FRANCE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-École nationale supérieure agronomique de Toulouse [ENSAT]-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), F. Herzog, P. Jeanneret, Y. Ammari, S. Angelova, M. Arndorfer, D. Bailey, K. Baláz, A. Báldi, M. Boger, R.H.G. Bunce, J.-P. Choisis, D. Cuming, P. Dennis, T. Dyman, S. Eiter, Z. Elek, E. Falusi, W. Fjellstad, T. Frank, J.K. Friedel, S. Garchi, I.R. Geijzendorffer, T. Gomiero, G. Jerkovich, R.H.G. Jongman, M. Kainz, E. Kakudidi, E. Kelemen, R. Kölliker, N. Kwikiriza, A. Kovács-Hostyánszki, L. Last, G. Lüscher, G. Moreno, C. Nkwiine, J. Opio, M.-L. Oschatz, M.G. Paoletti, K. Penksza, P. Pointereau, S. Riedel, J.-P. Sarthou, M.K. Schneider, N. Siebrecht, D. Sommaggio, S. Stoyanova, E. Szerencsits, O. Szalkovski, S. Targetti, D. Viaggi, J. Wilkes-Allemann, S. Wolfrum, S. Yashchenko, T. Zanetti, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), and Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse - INPT (FRANCE)
- Subjects
Sciences et techniques de l'agriculture ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Biodiversité et Ecologie ,Indicateurs ,Vers de terre ,Abeilles ,[SDV.SA.AEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics ,Plantes ,Agriculture biologique ,Araignées ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences ,Habitats ,[SDV.SA.STA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Sciences and technics of agriculture ,biodiversity indicators ,Agriculture, économie et politique ,Biodiversité ,[SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology ,Pratiques agricoles - Abstract
International audience; About one-third of the world’s land surface is used for farming, a fact that bears important implications for biodiversity. In Europe, for instance, an estimated 50 percent of all wild species are reliant on agricultural habitats, while agricultural productivity often depends on the presence or absence of particular species. Despite this close coupling, surprisingly little is known about the status and evolution of farmland biodiversity. A team of European and African researchers, hoping to fill this gap in information, recently invented and piloted a new toolbox called the BioBio indicator set, which measures 23 different instances of biodiversity across a variety of farm types and scales in Europe. Applications were also tested in Tunisia, Ukraine, and Uganda, where they proved a feasible starting point for adaptation to the agricultural context of different countries.
- Published
- 2013
4. Mechanical Irritation in Vascularized Composite Tissue Allotransplantation Triggers Localized Skin Rejection.
- Author
-
Messner F, Fischer AC, Runggaldier E, Sprung S, Müller J, Eiter S, Gantschnigg A, Zelger B, Zelger B, Wolfram D, Öfner D, Hautz T, and Schneeberger S
- Subjects
- Allografts, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Graft Rejection diagnosis, Graft Rejection prevention & control, Graft Survival, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Male, Rats, Rats, Inbred BN, Rats, Inbred Lew, Skin pathology, Graft Rejection etiology, Hindlimb transplantation, Skin Transplantation methods, Stress, Mechanical, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation methods
- Abstract
Background: Mechanical and thermal stress has been observed to trigger skin rejection in hand-transplanted patients. This study aims to investigate this phenomenon., Methods: Syngeneic and allogeneic orthotopic hindlimb transplantations were performed using male rats (Brown Norway to Lewis). Using a specially designed device, standardized mechanical skin irritation at a force of 5 N was applied to the planta pedis of the transplanted limb for 10 days, 4 times daily for 10 minutes. Biopsies, taken on day 10 and after a 5-day observational period, were assessed for macroscopic alterations using a standardized scale, by histopathology and immunohistochemistry, and for inflammatory protein expression using Luminex technology., Results: Allogeneic animals displayed significant aggravated macroscopic skin alterations compared with naive (P < 0.0001) and syngeneic controls (P = 0.0023). Histopathology showed a trend toward higher rejection/inflammation grades in allogeneic animals compared with syngeneic controls. Minor skin alterations in syngeneic limbs recovered quickly; however, in allogeneic limbs, macroscopic skin alterations were significantly more pronounced (P < 0.0001) 5 days after irritation. Interleukin-1b and interferon-γ levels were upregulated in skin of allogeneic limbs., Conclusions: Mechanical skin irritation in vascularized composite allotransplantation can trigger localized skin inflammation consistent with rejection.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Farmland biodiversity and agricultural management on 237 farms in 13 European and two African regions.
- Author
-
Lüscher G, Ammari Y, Andriets A, Angelova S, Arndorfer M, Bailey D, Balázs K, Bogers M, Bunce RG, Choisis JP, Dennis P, Díaz M, Dyman T, Eiter S, Fjellstad W, Fraser M, Friedel JK, Garchi S, Geijzendorffer IR, Gomiero T, González-Bornay G, Guteva Y, Herzog F, Jeanneret P, Jongman RH, Kainz M, Kwikiriza N, López Díaz ML, Moreno G, Nicholas-Davies P, Nkwiine C, Opio J, Paoletti MG, Podmaniczky L, Pointereau P, Pulido F, Sarthou JP, Schneider MK, Sghaier T, Siebrecht N, Stoyanova S, Wolfrum S, Yashchenko S, Albrecht H, Báldi A, Belényesi M, Benhadi-Marin J, Blick T, Buholzer S, Centeri C, Choisis N, Cuendet G, De Lange HJ, Déjean S, Deltshev C, Díaz Cosín DJ, Dramstad W, Elek Z, Engan G, Evtushenko K, Falusi E, Finch OD, Frank T, Gavinelli F, Genoud D, Gillingham PK, Grónás V, Gutiérrez M, Häusler W, Heer X, Hübner T, Isaia M, Jerkovich G, Jesus JB, Kakudidi E, Kelemen E, Koncz N, Kovacs E, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Last L, Ljubomirov T, Mandery K, Mayr J, Mjelde A, Muster C, Nascimbene J, Neumayer J, Ødegaard F, Ortiz Sánchez FJ, Oschatz ML, Papaja-Hülsbergen S, Paschetta M, Pavett M, Pelosi C, Penksza K, Pommeresche R, Popov V, Radchenko V, Richner N, Riedel S, Scullion J, Sommaggio D, Szalkovszki O, Szerencsits E, Trigo D, Vale J, van Kats R, Vasilev A, Whittington AE, Wilkes-Allemann J, and Zanetti T
- Subjects
- Africa, Animals, Bees, Crops, Agricultural, Ecosystem, Environmental Monitoring, Europe, Agriculture methods, Biodiversity, Farms
- Abstract
Farmland is a major land cover type in Europe and Africa and provides habitat for numerous species. The severe decline in farmland biodiversity of the last decades has been attributed to changes in farming practices, and organic and low-input farming are assumed to mitigate detrimental effects of agricultural intensification on biodiversity. Since the farm enterprise is the primary unit of agricultural decision making, management-related effects at the field scale need to be assessed at the farm level. Therefore, in this study, data were collected on habitat characteristics, vascular plant, earthworm, spider, and bee communities and on the corresponding agricultural management in 237 farms in 13 European and two African regions. In 15 environmental and agricultural homogeneous regions, 6-20 farms with the same farm type (e.g., arable crops, grassland, or specific permanent crops) were selected. If available, an equal number of organic and non-organic farms were randomly selected. Alternatively, farms were sampled along a gradient of management intensity. For all selected farms, the entire farmed area was mapped, which resulted in total in the mapping of 11 338 units attributed to 194 standardized habitat types, provided together with additional descriptors. On each farm, one site per available habitat type was randomly selected for species diversity investigations. Species were sampled on 2115 sites and identified to the species level by expert taxonomists. Species lists and abundance estimates are provided for each site and sampling date (one date for plants and earthworms, three dates for spiders and bees). In addition, farmers provided information about their management practices in face-to-face interviews following a standardized questionnaire. Farm management indicators for each farm are available (e.g., nitrogen input, pesticide applications, or energy input). Analyses revealed a positive effect of unproductive areas and a negative effect of intensive management on biodiversity. Communities of the four taxonomic groups strongly differed in their response to habitat characteristics, agricultural management, and regional circumstances. The data has potential for further insights into interactions of farmland biodiversity and agricultural management at site, farm, and regional scale., (© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Gains to species diversity in organically farmed fields are not propagated at the farm level.
- Author
-
Schneider MK, Lüscher G, Jeanneret P, Arndorfer M, Ammari Y, Bailey D, Balázs K, Báldi A, Choisis JP, Dennis P, Eiter S, Fjellstad W, Fraser MD, Frank T, Friedel JK, Garchi S, Geijzendorffer IR, Gomiero T, Gonzalez-Bornay G, Hector A, Jerkovich G, Jongman RH, Kakudidi E, Kainz M, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Moreno G, Nkwiine C, Opio J, Oschatz ML, Paoletti MG, Pointereau P, Pulido FJ, Sarthou JP, Siebrecht N, Sommaggio D, Turnbull LA, Wolfrum S, and Herzog F
- Subjects
- Animals, Bees classification, Environment, Oligochaeta classification, Plants classification, Spiders classification, Spiders growth & development, Bees growth & development, Biodiversity, Oligochaeta growth & development, Organic Agriculture
- Abstract
Organic farming is promoted to reduce environmental impacts of agriculture, but surprisingly little is known about its effects at the farm level, the primary unit of decision making. Here we report the effects of organic farming on species diversity at the field, farm and regional levels by sampling plants, earthworms, spiders and bees in 1470 fields of 205 randomly selected organic and nonorganic farms in twelve European and African regions. Species richness is, on average, 10.5% higher in organic than nonorganic production fields, with highest gains in intensive arable fields (around +45%). Gains to species richness are partly caused by higher organism abundance and are common in plants and bees but intermittent in earthworms and spiders. Average gains are marginal +4.6% at the farm and +3.1% at the regional level, even in intensive arable regions. Additional, targeted measures are therefore needed to fulfil the commitment of organic farming to benefit farmland biodiversity.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.